Jump to content

Iraq War: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Rmt2m (talk | contribs)
dang how many editors does it take to get you to stop inserting your POV into the article?
Big cleanup and NPOV-ing; see Talk
Line 9: Line 9:
|place= [[Iraq]]
|place= [[Iraq]]
|territory=
|territory=
|casus=allegations [[Saddam Hussein]] was harboring [[weapons of mass destruction]] and had ties to [[Al Qaeda]]
|casus=allegations [[Saddam Hussein]] was harboring [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|weapons of mass destruction]] and had ties to [[Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda|al-Qaeda]]
|result= Conflict ongoing
|result= Conflict ongoing
* Overthrow of Hussein government and [[capture of Saddam Hussein]].
* Overthrow of Hussein government and [[capture of Saddam Hussein]].
Line 34: Line 34:
==War rationale==
==War rationale==
{{main|Rationale for the Iraq War}}
{{main|Rationale for the Iraq War}}
According to critics, the rationale for the invasion presented by American and British leaders has changed several times, most notably after the [[September 11, 2001 attacks|9/11 terrorist attacks]].
According to critics, the rationale for the invasion presented by American and British leaders has changed several times.


===War Rationale Post 1991 Gulf War===
===Events following the 1991 Gulf War===
{{further|[[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction]], [[Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002]], [[Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda]], [[Public relations preparations for 2003 invasion of Iraq]], [[Iraq disarmament crisis]], and [[Iraq disarmament crisis timeline 2001-2003]], [[Operation Iraqi Freedom documents]], [[War on Terrorism]]}}
{{further|[[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction]], [[Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002]], [[Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda]], [[Public relations preparations for 2003 invasion of Iraq]], [[Iraq disarmament crisis]], and [[Iraq disarmament crisis timeline 2001-2003]], [[Operation Iraqi Freedom documents]], [[War on Terrorism]]}}


After the [[1991]] [[Gulf War]], UN Resolutions were passed to impose [[Iraq sanctions|sanctions]] on the regime of Saddam Hussein until it was verified that their [[Weapons of Mass Destruction]] were destroyed. Starting in the aftermath of the war and continuing until [[1998]], UNSCOM inspected Iraq, locating and destroying large quantities of chemical agents, nuclear related equipment and other prohibited materials.<ref name="chronologyframe">[http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm Chronology of main events]. United Nations. December 1999.</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Inspecting Iraq - High Noon in Baghdad |publisher=CNN |date=1998 |url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1998/iraq/9803/weapon.search/video}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title= What UNSCOM Achieved: Analysis |publisher=PBS Frontline |date=Unavailable |url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/unscom/experts/achieved.html}}</ref> Conflict between Iraq and the UN developed during [[1998]], however, which led to the withdrawal of the UN and the authorization of [[Operation Desert Fox|a bombing campaign]] by the [[Clinton administration]] to "degrade Saddam's capacity to develop and deliver weapons of mass destruction, and to degrade his ability to threaten his neighbors".<ref>{{cite news|title=Transcript: President Clinton explains Iraq strike |publisher=CNN |date=[[1998-12-16]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq attacked in 'Operation Desert Fox' |publisher=CNN |date=[[1998-12-16]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/meast/9812/16/iraq.strike.03/}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Desert Fox |publisher=BBC |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/middle_east/02/iraq_events/html/desert_fox.stm}}</ref>
After the [[1991]] [[Gulf War]], then-[[United States Secretary of Defense]] [[Dick Cheney]] reported that "Saddam Hussein's offensive military capability, his capacity to threaten his neighbors, has been virtually eliminated." Yet there was still much concern over Iraq's [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|weapons programs]], so [[United Nations]] Resolutions were passed to impose [[Iraq sanctions|sanctions]] on the regime of Saddam Hussein until it was verified that its [[weapons of mass destruction]] were destroyed. Starting in the aftermath of the war and continuing until [[1998]], UNSCOM inspected Iraq, locating and destroying large quantities of chemical agents, nuclear-related equipment and other prohibited materials.<ref name="chronologyframe">[http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/Chronology/chronologyframe.htm Chronology of main events]. United Nations. December 1999.</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Inspecting Iraq - High Noon in Baghdad |publisher=CNN |date=1998 |url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/1998/iraq/9803/weapon.search/video}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title= What UNSCOM Achieved: Analysis |publisher=PBS Frontline |date=Unavailable |url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/unscom/experts/achieved.html}}</ref> Conflict between Iraq and the UN developed during [[1998]], however, which led to the withdrawal of the UN and the authorization of [[Operation Desert Fox|a bombing campaign]] by the [[Clinton administration]] to "degrade Saddam's capacity to develop and deliver weapons of mass destruction, and to degrade his ability to threaten his neighbors".<ref>{{cite news|title=Transcript: President Clinton explains Iraq strike |publisher=CNN |date=[[1998-12-16]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq attacked in 'Operation Desert Fox' |publisher=CNN |date=[[1998-12-16]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/meast/9812/16/iraq.strike.03/}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Desert Fox |publisher=BBC |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/middle_east/02/iraq_events/html/desert_fox.stm}}</ref>


Furthermore, in November 1998, at the urging of President [[Bill Clinton]], the U.S. House of Representatives and the US Senate passed the "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998," <ref>{{cite web | url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.4655.ENR: | title=Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 | publisher=The Library of Congress | accessdate=2006-08-29]}}</ref> which "declare[d] that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime from power in Iraq and to replace it with a democratic government." President Clinton signed this bill into law. It also stated in, Section 8, that "Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise speak to the use of United States Armed Forces..." <ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 |publisher=IraqWatch.Org |url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Legislation/ILA.htm}}</ref>
Furthermore, in November 1998, at the urging of President [[Bill Clinton]], the U.S. House of Representatives and the US Senate passed the "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998," <ref>{{cite web | url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.4655.ENR: | title=Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 | publisher=The Library of Congress | accessdate=2006-08-29]}}</ref> which "declare[d] that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime from power in Iraq and to replace it with a democratic government." President Clinton signed this bill into law. It also stated that "nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise speak to the use of United States Armed Forces," instead calling for support of Iraqi opposition groups. <ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 |publisher=IraqWatch.Org |url=http://www.iraqwatch.org/government/US/Legislation/ILA.htm}}</ref>


From April, [[1991]] and the formation of [[UNSCOM]], Iraq had been under ongoing pressure by the [[United Nations]] to declare and destroy its biological and chemical weapons. In total the UN had passed 13 resolutions calling for complete access of UNSCOM and [[IAEA]] officials to locate and destroy all weapons of mass destruction.<ref name="chronologyframe"/>
From April [[1991]] and the formation of [[UNSCOM]], Iraq had been under ongoing pressure by the [[United Nations]] to declare and destroy its biological and chemical weapons. In total the UN had passed 13 resolutions calling for complete access of UNSCOM and [[International Atomic Energy Agency|IAEA]] officials to locate and destroy all weapons of mass destruction.<ref name="chronologyframe"/>


Claire Short claims that in July 2002, UK government ministers were warned that Britain was committed to participating in a U.S. invasion of Iraq, and a further allegation was that “the decision by Blair’s government to participate in the U.S. invasion of Iraq bypassed proper government procedures and ignored opposition to the war from Britain’s intelligence quarters.“{{fact}}. [[Tony Blair]] had agreed to back military action to oust [[Saddam Hussein]] with an [[September Dossier|assessment]] regarding [[WMD]], at a summit at President [[George W. Bush]]'s Texas ranch. Also, present at the meeting, were [[Geoff Hoon]], then British defence secretary, [[Jack Straw]], then British [[foreign secretary]], and Sir [[Richard Dearlove]], then chief of [[MI6]].
Claire Short claims that in July 2002, UK government ministers were warned that Britain was committed to participating in a U.S. invasion of Iraq, and a further allegation was that “the decision by Blair’s government to participate in the U.S. invasion of Iraq bypassed proper government procedures and ignored opposition to the war from Britain’s intelligence quarters.“<ref>{{cite web|title=Claire Short|url=http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/entity.jsp?entity=claire_short}}</ref>fact}}. [[Tony Blair]] had agreed to back military action to oust [[Saddam Hussein]] with an [[September Dossier|assessment]] regarding WMD, at a summit at President [[George W. Bush]]'s Texas ranch. Also present at the meeting, were [[Geoff Hoon]], then-British defence secretary, [[Jack Straw]], then-British [[foreign secretary]], and Sir [[Richard Dearlove]], then-chief of [[MI6]].


Beginning in September, [[2002]], an [[Iraq disarmament crisis]] emerged due to claims that [[Iraq]] did not fully comply with previous UN resolutions.<ref>{{cite news|title=President's Remarks at the United Nations General Assembly |publisher=Whitehouse |date= [[2002-09-12]] |url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020912-1.html}}</ref>
Beginning in September, [[2002]], an [[Iraq disarmament crisis]] emerged due to assertions that "Saddam Hussein's regime is a grave and gathering danger" and that Iraq possessed and was developing large stockpiles of [[weapons of mass destruction]] in violation of UN sanctions.<ref>{{cite news|title=President's Remarks at the United Nations General Assembly |publisher=Whitehouse |date= [[2002-09-12]] |url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020912-1.html}}</ref>


On [[October 16]], [[2002]] an [[Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002]] was passed in the United States House of Congress. In November, [[2002]], [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441|UN Security Council Resolution 1441]] was passed unanimously demanding that Iraq comply with its disarmament obligations as well as previous resolutions on human rights, terrorism and prisoners of war. Iraq agreed to the resolution and [[UNMOVIC]] began inspections on [[November 18]], [[2002]], replacing UNSCOM which had previously been in charge of monitoring Iraq since [[April 3]], [[1991]].<ref name="chronologyframe"/><ref>{{cite news|title=UNMOVIC:Basic facts |publisher=United Nations: UNMOVIC |url=http://www.unmovic.org}}</ref> Four months later on [[March 7]], [[2003]], head of the inspectors, [[Hans Blix]] made his last presentation to the [[U.N.]] describing Iraq's cooperation in resolving outstanding issues as "active or even proactive," he went on to state "these initiatives three to four months into the new resolution cannot be said to constitute immediate cooperation."<ref name="transcript.blix">{{cite news|title=Transcript of Blix's U.N. presentation |publisher=CNN |date=[[2003-03-07]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/07/sprj.irq.un.transcript.blix/}}</ref>
On [[October 16]], [[2002]] an [[Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002]] was passed in the United States House of Congress. In November, [[2002]], [[United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441|UN Security Council Resolution 1441]] was passed unanimously demanding that Iraq comply with its disarmament obligations as well as previous resolutions on human rights, terrorism and prisoners of war. Iraq agreed to the resolution and [[UNMOVIC]] began inspections on [[November 18]], [[2002]], replacing UNSCOM which had previously been in charge of monitoring Iraq since [[April 3]], [[1991]].<ref name="chronologyframe"/><ref>{{cite news|title=UNMOVIC:Basic facts |publisher=United Nations: UNMOVIC |url=http://www.unmovic.org}}</ref> Four months later on [[March 7]], [[2003]], chief inspector [[Hans Blix]] made his last presentation to the [[U.N.]] describing Iraq's cooperation in resolving outstanding issues as "active or even proactive," although "these initiatives three to four months into the new resolution cannot be said to constitute immediate cooperation."<ref name="transcript.blix">{{cite news|title=Transcript of Blix's U.N. presentation |publisher=CNN |date=[[2003-03-07]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/07/sprj.irq.un.transcript.blix/}}</ref>


After failed attempts to get a [[United Nations Security Council]] resolution supporting military action against Iraq that would enforced the many previous violated resolutions against Iraq and Saddam Hussein given over more than a decade, the United States unilaterally delivered an [[ultimatum]] on [[March 17]], [[2003]], demanding that [[Saddam Hussein]] leave Iraq within 48 hours.<ref>{{cite news|title=President Says Saddam Hussein Must Leave Iraq Within 48 Hours |publisher=Whitehouse |date=[[2003-03-17]] |url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030317-7.html}}</ref> On [[March 18]], [[2003]] the U.S. announced the formation of the "[[Coalition of the willing]]".<ref>{{cite news|title=US names 'coalition of the willing' |publisher=BBC |date=[[2003-03-18]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2862343.stm}}</ref><ref name="transcript.blix"/><ref>{{cite news|title=Bush: Iraq is playing 'wilful charade' |publisher=CNN |date=[[2003-03-07]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/06/sprj.irq.main/index.html}}</ref> On [[March 20]], [[2003]] the [[2003 Invasion of Iraq]] began, led by the United States and the [[United Kingdom]], and the "Coalition of the Willing".<ref>{{cite news|title=President Bush Addresses the Nation |publisher=Whitehouse |date=[[2003-03-19]] |url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030319-17.html}}</ref>
After failed attempts to get a [[United Nations Security Council]] resolution supporting military action against Iraq, the United States unilaterally delivered an [[ultimatum]] on [[March 17]], [[2003]], demanding that [[Saddam Hussein]] leave Iraq within 48 hours.<ref>{{cite news|title=President Says Saddam Hussein Must Leave Iraq Within 48 Hours |publisher=Whitehouse |date=[[2003-03-17]] |url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030317-7.html}}</ref> On [[March 18]], [[2003]] the U.S. announced the formation of the "[[Coalition of the willing]]".<ref>{{cite news|title=US names 'coalition of the willing' |publisher=BBC |date=[[2003-03-18]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2862343.stm}}</ref><ref name="transcript.blix"/><ref>{{cite news|title=Bush: Iraq is playing 'wilful charade' |publisher=CNN |date=[[2003-03-07]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/06/sprj.irq.main/index.html}}</ref> On [[March 20]], [[2003]] the [[2003 Invasion of Iraq]] began, led by the United States and the [[United Kingdom]], and the "Coalition of the Willing".<ref>{{cite news|title=U.S. launches cruise missiles at Saddam |publisher=CNN |date=[[2003-03-20]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/19/sprj.irq.main/}}</ref>


===War Rationale Post September 11, 2001 ===
=== War Rationale Post September 11, 2001 ===
Reasons for the invasion and occupation as stated by the United States in 2002 before the Iraq invasion are controversial, and have varied over time. The first calls for war on Iraq came from the [[Project for the New American Century]] (PNAC), and the [[American Enterprise Institute]], with arguments based largely on the alleged threat that Saddam posed to American interests in the region, and the project of American influence into the next century. These reasons were not those given by the Bush administration of the United States and have never been recognized by the government.
Reasons for the invasion and occupation are controversial, and have varied over time. The first calls for invasion of Iraq came from the [[Project for the New American Century]] (PNAC), and the [[American Enterprise Institute]], with arguments based largely on the alleged threat that Saddam posed to American interests in the region, and the project of American influence into the next century. These reasons were not those given by the Bush administration of the United States and have never been recognized by the government.


Beginning with a speech to the [[United Nations General Assembly]] on [[September 12]], [[2002]] President [[George W. Bush]] began a public campaign to convince the world that Saddam Hussein was violating both the commitments he had made at the end of the [[Gulf War|First Gulf War]] and which prior UN resolutions dealt with: [[weapons of mass destruction]], human rights, Kuwaiti prisoners of war, terrorism, long range [[SCUD]] missiles, the U.N. [[Oil-for-Food Programme]] and allowing UN inspectors to return to Iraq after their removal in 1998.<ref>{{cite news|title=President Bush's address to the United Nations |publisher=CNN |date=[[2002-09-12]] |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/09/12/bush.transcript/}}</ref> Despite repeated claims by President Bush to the contrary, continuing even recently,<ref>{{cite news|title=President Reaffirms Strong Position on Liberia |publisher=Whitehouse |date=[[2003-07-14]] |url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030714-3.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Bush Uranium Lie Is Tip of the Iceberg |publisher=FAIR.Org |date=[[2003-07-18]] |url=http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1841}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Bush Trims a Tale |publisher=Consortium News.Com |date=[[2004-09-23]] |url=http://www.consortiumnews.com/2004/092304.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=OpEd:Saddam chose to deny inspectors |publisher=Salon.Com |date=[[2006-03-31]] |url=http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2006/03/31/bush_lies/index.html}}</ref> Iraq agreed to allow inspectors back into the country on [[September 17]], [[2002]].<ref>{{cite news|title=UN inspectors begin Iraq mission |publisher=BBC |date=[[2002-11-18]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2488189.stm}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq agrees to weapons inspections |publisher=CNN |date=[[2002-09-17]] |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/09/16/iraq.un.letter/}}</ref> Inspections began after the passage of U.N. Resolution 1441 on [[November 18]], [[2002]].<ref>{{cite news|title=Timeline: Iraq weapons inspections |publisher=BBC |date=[[2002-11-18]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2167933.stm}}</ref>. Bush and his cabinet repeatedly linked the Hussein government to the 9/11 attacks on the basis of an alleged meeting in Prague in April 2001 involving an Iraqi intelligence agent and other evidence.<ref name="Mylroie">Mylroie, Laurie, [http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13323 "The Saddam-9/11 Link Confirmed"], FrontPageMagazine.com, [[May 11]], [[2004]]</ref>. Both a Senate Select Committee and the 9/11 Commission failed to uncover convincing evidence of such a link.<ref>United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiaccuracy.pdf. Retrieved [[10 September]] [[2006]]. </ref><ref>United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiinc.pdf. Retrieved [[10 September]], [[2006]]. </ref><ref> Section 10.3, ''The 9/11 Commission Report'' (2004). http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch10.htm. Retrieved [[10 September]] [[2006]]. </ref>
Beginning with a speech to the [[United Nations General Assembly]] on [[September 12]], [[2002]] President [[George W. Bush]] began a public campaign to convince the world that Saddam Hussein was violating both the commitments he had made at the end of the [[Gulf War|First Gulf War]] and which prior UN resolutions dealt with: [[weapons of mass destruction]], human rights, Kuwaiti prisoners of war, terrorism, long range [[SCUD]] missiles, the U.N. [[Oil-for-Food Programme]] and allowing UN inspectors to return to Iraq after their removal in 1998.<ref>{{cite news|title=President Bush's address to the United Nations |publisher=CNN |date=[[2002-09-12]] |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/09/12/bush.transcript/}}</ref> Despite repeated claims by President Bush to the contrary, continuing even recently,<ref>{{cite news|title=President Reaffirms Strong Position on Liberia |publisher=Whitehouse |date=[[2003-07-14]] |url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030714-3.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Bush Uranium Lie Is Tip of the Iceberg |publisher=FAIR.Org |date=[[2003-07-18]] |url=http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1841}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Bush Trims a Tale |publisher=Consortium News.Com |date=[[2004-09-23]] |url=http://www.consortiumnews.com/2004/092304.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=OpEd:Saddam chose to deny inspectors |publisher=Salon.Com |date=[[2006-03-31]] |url=http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2006/03/31/bush_lies/index.html}}</ref> Iraq agreed to allow inspectors back into the country on [[September 17]], [[2002]].<ref>{{cite news|title=UN inspectors begin Iraq mission |publisher=BBC |date=[[2002-11-18]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2488189.stm}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq agrees to weapons inspections |publisher=CNN |date=[[2002-09-17]] |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/09/16/iraq.un.letter/}}</ref> Inspections began after the passage of U.N. Resolution 1441 on [[November 18]], [[2002]].<ref>{{cite news|title=Timeline: Iraq weapons inspections |publisher=BBC |date=[[2002-11-18]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2167933.stm}}</ref>. Bush and his cabinet repeatedly linked the Hussein government to the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]] on the basis of an alleged meeting in Prague in April 2001 involving an Iraqi intelligence agent and other evidence.<ref name="Mylroie">Mylroie, Laurie, [http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13323 "The Saddam-9/11 Link Confirmed"], FrontPageMagazine.com, [[May 11]], [[2004]]</ref>. Both a Senate Select Committee and the 9/11 Commission failed to uncover convincing evidence of such a link.<ref>United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiaccuracy.pdf. Retrieved [[10 September]] [[2006]].</ref><ref>United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiinc.pdf. Retrieved [[10 September]], [[2006]]. </ref><ref> Section 10.3, ''The 9/11 Commission Report'' (2004). http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch10.htm. Retrieved [[10 September]] [[2006]]. </ref>


[[Image:Powell-anthrax-vial.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Colin Powell]] holding a model vial of [[anthrax]] while giving a presentation to the [[United Nations Security Council]]. He later referred to this speech as a "painful" "blot" on his record.<ref>[http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Politics/story?id=1105979&page=1 "Colin Powell on Iraq, Race, and Hurricane Relief", ABC News</ref>]]
[[Image:Powell-anthrax-vial.jpg|thumb|300px|[[Colin Powell]] holding a model vial of [[anthrax]] while giving a presentation to the [[United Nations Security Council]]. He later referred to this speech as "painful," saying it was a "blot" on his record.<ref>[http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Politics/story?id=1105979&page=1 "Colin Powell on Iraq, Race, and Hurricane Relief", ABC News</ref>]]


On [[October 10]], [[2002]] the 107th Congress of the United States passed HJ Res 114 titled "Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002." Among the reasons noted in the Congressional resolution authorizing force were, Iraq's non-compliance with U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441,<ref>{{cite news|title=Text of U.N. resolution on Iraq |publisher=CNN |date=[[2002-11-08]] |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/11/08/resolution.text/}}</ref> aid to terrorists (PALF),<ref>{{cite news|title=Saddam Pays 35K for Palestinian Bombers |publisher=Fox News |date=[[2002-03-26]] |url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,48822,00.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Saddam dispenses blood money to win Palestinian hearts |publisher=The Age |date=[[2002-03-26]] |url=http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/03/25/1017004765036.html}}</ref> a 1993 assassination attempt on former President [[George H. W. Bush]] (George W. Bush's father)<ref>{{cite news|title=U.S. Strikes Iraq for Plot to Kill Bush |publisher=Washington Post |date=[[1993-06-27]] |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/iraq/timeline/062793.htm}}</ref> and the Emir of Kuwait, in addition to violations of the no-fly zones.<ref>{{cite news|title=U.S.: Coalition aircraft strike Iraqi artillery site |publisher=CNN |date=[[2003-01-26]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/01/25/sprj.irq.airstrike/index.html}}</ref>
On [[October 10]], [[2002]] the 107th Congress of the United States passed HJ Res 114 titled "Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002." Among the reasons noted in the Congressional resolution authorizing force were Iraq's non-compliance with U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441,<ref>{{cite news|title=Text of U.N. resolution on Iraq |publisher=CNN |date=[[2002-11-08]] |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/11/08/resolution.text/}}</ref> aid to terrorists (PALF),<ref>{{cite news|title=Saddam Pays 35K for Palestinian Bombers |publisher=Fox News |date=[[2002-03-26]] |url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,48822,00.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Saddam dispenses blood money to win Palestinian hearts |publisher=The Age |date=[[2002-03-26]] |url=http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/03/25/1017004765036.html}}</ref> a 1993 assassination attempt on former President [[George H. W. Bush]] (George W. Bush's father)<ref>{{cite news|title=U.S. Strikes Iraq for Plot to Kill Bush |publisher=Washington Post |date=[[1993-06-27]] |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/iraq/timeline/062793.htm}}</ref> and the Emir of Kuwait, in addition to violations of the no-fly zones.<ref>{{cite news|title=U.S.: Coalition aircraft strike Iraqi artillery site |publisher=CNN |date=[[2003-01-26]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/01/25/sprj.irq.airstrike/index.html}}</ref>


In a January 27, [[2003]] report to the U.N., chief inspector Hans Blix, while noting Iraqi cooperation with regards to prompt access to inspection sites, stated "...Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance, not even today, of the disarmament which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace." The reasons for this include a failure to account for quantities of [[VX (nerve agent)|VX nerve agent]] and [[anthrax]] and also the inability of the U.N. to interview Iraqi scientists outside the country.<ref>{{cite news|title=Transcript of Blix's remarks |publisher=CNN |date=[[2003-01-27]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/01/27/sprj.irq.transcript.blix/index.html}}</ref> As late as June 2003, Hans Blix stated that it would be "no surprise" if WMD were found in Iraq. [http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/06/06/sprj.irq.blix.wmd/index.html] Later, however, Hans Blix was sceptical of the motivation for the invasion of Iraq. <ref>{{cite news|title=Profile: Hans Blix |publisher=BBC |date=[[2004-02-08]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2268819.stm}}</ref>
In his January 27, [[2003]] report to the U.N., chief inspector Hans Blix, while noting Iraqi cooperation with regards to prompt access to inspection sites, stated "...Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance, not even today, of the disarmament which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace." The reasons for this include a failure to account for quantities of [[VX (nerve agent)|VX nerve agent]] and [[anthrax]] and also the inability of the U.N. to interview Iraqi scientists outside the country.<ref>{{cite news|title=Transcript of Blix's remarks |publisher=CNN |date=[[2003-01-27]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/01/27/sprj.irq.transcript.blix/index.html}}</ref> As late as June 2003, Hans Blix stated that although his team had found no evidence of WMD, "I don't exclude that they can find things. ... I don't think I'd be surprised if they found it." [http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/europe/06/06/sprj.irq.blix.wmd/index.html] Later, however, Hans Blix was sceptical of the motivation for the invasion of Iraq. <ref>{{cite news|title=Profile: Hans Blix |publisher=BBC |date=[[2004-02-08]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2268819.stm}}</ref>


On [[February 5]], [[2003]] [[Colin Powell]] attempted to convince the [[The UN Security Council and the Iraq war|UN Security Council]] of the threat Saddam Hussein's regime posed.<ref>{{cite news|title=Remarks to the United Nations Security Council |publisher=United States Department of State |date=[[2003-02-05]] |url=http://www.state.gov/secretary/former/powell/remarks/2003/17300.htm}}</ref> The [[George W. Bush administration|Bush administration]] also claimed that [[Iraq ties to al Qaeda|Iraq had ties to al Qaeda]] and other terrorists organizations, including the Palestinian Arab Liberation Front (PALF), [[Hamas|HAMAS]], [[Islamic Jihad]], and [[Hezbollah]].<ref>{{cite news|title=Palestinians get Saddam funds |publisher=BBC |date=[[2003-03-13]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2846365.stm}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=White House spells out case against Iraq |publisher=CNN |date=[[2002-09-12]] |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/09/12/iraq.report/index.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Bush stands by al Qaeda, Saddam link |publisher=CNN |date=[[2004-06-15]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/06/15/bush.alqaeda/}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Al Qaeda-Hussein Link Is Dismissed |publisher=Washington Post |date=[[2004-06-17]] |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A47812-2004Jun16.html}}</ref> Bush administration officials also claimed that Iraq was reconstituting their development of nuclear weapons.<ref>{{cite news|title=Top Bush officials push case against Saddam |publisher=CNN |date=[[2002-09-08]] |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/09/08/iraq.debate/}}</ref> Powell later expressed regret that the evidence for his claims, while they "reflected the collective judgment, the sound judgment of the intelligence community" the sourcing was "inaccurate and wrong and in some cases, deliberately misleading." <ref> Powell, Colin. Quoted in transcript for ''Meet the Press'', May 16, 2004. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4992558/ Retrieved 17 Sep 2006. </ref> <ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/08/AR2006090800777.html</ref>
On [[February 5]], [[2003]] [[Colin Powell]] attempted to convince the [[The UN Security Council and the Iraq war|UN Security Council]] that Saddam Hussein's regime posed a significant and timely threat to international security.<ref>{{cite news|title=Remarks to the United Nations Security Council |publisher=United States Department of State |date=[[2003-02-05]] |url=http://www.state.gov/secretary/former/powell/remarks/2003/17300.htm}}</ref> The [[George W. Bush administration|Bush administration]] also claimed that Iraq was [[Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda|allied]] with al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations, including the Palestinian Arab Liberation Front (PALF), [[Hamas]], [[Islamic Jihad]], and [[Hezbollah]].<ref>{{cite news|title=Palestinians get Saddam funds |publisher=BBC |date=[[2003-03-13]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2846365.stm}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=White House spells out case against Iraq |publisher=CNN |date=[[2002-09-12]] |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/09/12/iraq.report/index.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Bush stands by al Qaeda, Saddam link |publisher=CNN |date=[[2004-06-15]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/06/15/bush.alqaeda/}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Al Qaeda-Hussein Link Is Dismissed |publisher=Washington Post |date=[[2004-06-17]] |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A47812-2004Jun16.html}}</ref> Bush administration officials also claimed that Iraq was developing nuclear weapons.<ref>{{cite news|title=Top Bush officials push case against Saddam |publisher=CNN |date=[[2002-09-08]] |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/09/08/iraq.debate/}}</ref> Powell later expressed regret that the evidence for his claims, while they "reflected the collective judgment, the sound judgment of the intelligence community" the sourcing was "inaccurate and wrong and in some cases, deliberately misleading." <ref> Powell, Colin. Quoted in transcript for ''Meet the Press'', May 16, 2004. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4992558/ Retrieved 17 Sep 2006. </ref> <ref>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/08/AR2006090800777.html</ref>


===Criticisms of the rationale for the Iraq war===
===Criticisms of the rationale for the Iraq war===
Line 70: Line 70:
{{seealso|Opposition to the Iraq War|Legitimacy of the 2003 invasion of Iraq|Protests against the Iraq war|Views on the 2003 invasion of Iraq|}}
{{seealso|Opposition to the Iraq War|Legitimacy of the 2003 invasion of Iraq|Protests against the Iraq war|Views on the 2003 invasion of Iraq|}}
Despite these efforts to sway public opinion, the invasion of Iraq was seen by many as a violation of [[international law]], breaking the [[UN Charter]] (see [[Legitimacy of the 2003 invasion of Iraq]]).<ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq war illegal, says Annan |publisher=BBC |date=[[2004-09-16]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3661134.stm}}</ref>
Despite these efforts to sway public opinion, the invasion of Iraq was seen by many as a violation of [[international law]], breaking the [[UN Charter]] (see [[Legitimacy of the 2003 invasion of Iraq]]).<ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq war illegal, says Annan |publisher=BBC |date=[[2004-09-16]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3661134.stm}}</ref>
especially since the U.S. failed to secure U.N. support for an invasion of Iraq. In 41 countries the majority of the populace did not support an invasion of Iraq without U.N. sanction and half said an invasion should not occur under any circumstances,<ref name="gallup Iraq survey 2003">[http://www.gallup-international.com/download/GIA%20press%20release%20Iraq%20Survey%202003.pdf Iraq Survey 2003]. Gallup International. </ref> except in the U.S. where 73 percent of [[United States|Americans]] supported an invasion.<ref name="gallup Iraq survey 2003"/> To build international support the [[United States]] formed a "Coalition of the Willing" with [[U.K.]], [[Italy]] and several other countries despite a majority of citizens in these countries opposing the invasion.<ref name="gallup Iraq survey 2003"/> Massive protests on the war have occurred in the U.S. and elsewhere.<ref>{{cite news|title=Cities jammed in worldwide protest of war in Iraq |publisher=CNN |date=[[2003-02-16]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/15/sprj.irq.protests.main}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title='Million' march against Iraq war |publisher=BBC |date=[[2003-02-16]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2765041.stm}}</ref><ref>[http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/content_pages/record.asp?recordid=54365 Largest Anti-War Rally]. Guinness Book of World Records.</ref> At the time of the invasion UNMOVIC inspectors were ordered out by the United Nations. The inspectors requested more time as they were unable to account for the destruction of all proscribed items in the four months since inspections had resumed.<ref>{{cite news|title=Blix wants months - and Straw offers 10 days |publisher=The Guardian |date= [[2003-03-07]] |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,909793,00.html}}</ref><ref name="transcript.blix"/>
especially since the U.S. failed to secure U.N. support for an invasion of Iraq. In 41 countries the majority of the populace did not support an invasion of Iraq without U.N. sanction and half said an invasion should not occur under any circumstances.<ref name="gallup Iraq survey 2003">[http://www.gallup-international.com/download/GIA%20press%20release%20Iraq%20Survey%202003.pdf Iraq Survey 2003]. Gallup International. </ref> In the U.S., 73 percent of [[United States|Americans]] supported an invasion.<ref name="gallup Iraq survey 2003"/> To build international support the United States formed a "Coalition of the Willing" with [[United Kingdom]], [[Italy]] and several other countries despite a majority of citizens in these countries opposing the invasion.<ref name="gallup Iraq survey 2003"/> Massive protests on the war have occurred in the U.S. and elsewhere.<ref>{{cite news|title=Cities jammed in worldwide protest of war in Iraq |publisher=CNN |date=[[2003-02-16]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/02/15/sprj.irq.protests.main}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title='Million' march against Iraq war |publisher=BBC |date=[[2003-02-16]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2765041.stm}}</ref><ref>[http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/content_pages/record.asp?recordid=54365 Largest Anti-War Rally]. Guinness Book of World Records.</ref> At the time of the invasion [[UNMOVIC]] inspectors were ordered out by the United Nations. The inspectors requested more time because "disarmament, and at any rate verification, cannot be instant."<ref>{{cite news|title=Blix wants months - and Straw offers 10 days |publisher=The Guardian |date= [[2003-03-07]] |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,909793,00.html}}</ref><ref name="transcript.blix"/>


Following the disputed invasion, no stockpiles of [[weapons of mass destruction]] were found, although about 500 chemical munitions from Iraq's [[Iran-Iraq war]]-era chemical weapons, mostly degraded, were collected from around the country.<ref>{{cite news|title=New report offers no evidence that Iraq stockpiled WMD|publisher=Mercury News |date= [[2006-06-22]] |url=http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/14879499.htm}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Sarin, Mustard Gas Discovered Separately in Iraq |publisher=Fox News |date= [[2004-05-17]] |url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Hundreds of chemical weapons found in Iraq |publisher=Breitbart |date= [[2006-06-22]] |url=http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/060622055545.07o4imol.html}}</ref> [[David Kelly|The Kelly Affair]] highlighted a possible attempt by the British government to cover-up fabrications in British intelligence, the exposure of which would have undermined the Prime Minister's original rationale for involvement in the war. The U.S. [[Senate Select Committee on Intelligence]] found no substantiating evidence for reputed links between Iraq and Al Qaeda.<ref>United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiaccuracy.pdf. Retrieved Sep. 10, 2006. </ref><ref>United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiinc.pdf. Retrieved Sep. 10, 2006.</ref> President George W. Bush has since admitted that "much of the intelligence turned out to be wrong".<ref>{{cite news|title=Bush takes responsibility for invasion intelligence |publisher=CNN |date= [[2005-12-14]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/14/bush.iraq/index.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Transcript of Bush speech |publisher=CNN |date=[[2005-12-14]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/14/bush.transcript/index.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Bush admits Iraq intelligence was wrong |publisher=The Guardian |date=[[2005-12-14]] |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1667412,00.html}}</ref>
Following the disputed invasion, no stockpiles of [[weapons of mass destruction]] were found, although about 500 abandoned chemical munitions, mostly degraded, remaining from Iraq's [[Iran-Iraq war]]-era chemical weapons, were collected from around the country.<ref>{{cite news|title=New report offers no evidence that Iraq stockpiled WMD|publisher=Mercury News |date= [[2006-06-22]] |url=http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/14879499.htm}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Sarin, Mustard Gas Discovered Separately in Iraq |publisher=Fox News |date= [[2004-05-17]] |url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Hundreds of chemical weapons found in Iraq |publisher=Breitbart |date= [[2006-06-22]] |url=http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/06/22/060622055545.07o4imol.html}}</ref> [[David Kelly|The Kelly Affair]] highlighted a possible attempt by the British government to cover-up fabrications in British intelligence, the exposure of which would have undermined the [[Tony Blair|Prime Minister's]] original rationale for involvement in the war. The U.S. [[Senate Select Committee on Intelligence]] found no substantial evidence for reputed links between Iraq and al-Qaeda.<ref>United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiaccuracy.pdf. Retrieved Sep. 10, 2006. </ref><ref>United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiinc.pdf. Retrieved Sep. 10, 2006.</ref> President George W. Bush has since admitted that "much of the intelligence turned out to be wrong".<ref>{{cite news|title=Bush takes responsibility for invasion intelligence |publisher=CNN |date= [[2005-12-14]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/14/bush.iraq/index.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Transcript of Bush speech |publisher=CNN |date=[[2005-12-14]] |url=http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/14/bush.transcript/index.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Bush admits Iraq intelligence was wrong |publisher=The Guardian |date=[[2005-12-14]] |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1667412,00.html}}</ref>


Although evidence of WMD was searched for by the Iraq Survey Group, their Final Report of September 2004, stated "While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force against it should WMD be discovered."<ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq Survey Group Final Report |publisher=GlobalSecurity.Org|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/isg-final-report_vol3_cw_key-findings.htm}}</ref> In the March 2005 Addendum to the Report, the Special Advisor furthermore went on to state that "ISG assesses that Iraq and Coalition Forces will continue to discover small numbers of
Although evidence of WMD was searched for by the Iraq Survey Group, their final report of September 2004 stated, "While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force against it should WMD be discovered."<ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq Survey Group Final Report |publisher=GlobalSecurity.Org|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/isg-final-report_vol3_cw_key-findings.htm}}</ref> In the March 2005 Addendum to the Report, the Special Advisor furthermore went on to state that "ISG assesses that Iraq and Coalition Forces will continue to discover small numbers of
degraded chemical weapons, which the former Regime mislaid or improperly destroyed prior
degraded chemical weapons, which the former Regime mislaid or improperly destroyed prior
to 1991. ISG believes the bulk of these weapons were likely abandoned, forgotten and lost during the Iran-Iraq war because tens of thousands of CW munitions were forward deployed along frequently and rapidly shifting battlefronts."<ref>{{cite news|title=Addendums to the Comprehensive Report |publisher=GlobalSecurity.Org |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2005/isg-addendums_mar2005.pdf}}</ref> (For comparison, the U.S. Department of Defense itself was famously unable in 1998 to report the whereabouts of "56 airplanes, 32 tanks and 36 Javelin command launch units".)<ref>{{cite news|title=Government’s financial systems fall flat |publisher=Government Computer News |date=[[2000-06-24]]|url=http://www.gcn.com/print/vol19_no20a/2482-1.html}}</ref>
to 1991. ISG believes the bulk of these weapons were likely abandoned, forgotten and lost during the Iran-Iraq war because tens of thousands of CW munitions were forward deployed along frequently and rapidly shifting battlefronts."<ref>{{cite news|title=Addendums to the Comprehensive Report |publisher=GlobalSecurity.Org |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2005/isg-addendums_mar2005.pdf}}</ref> (For comparison, the U.S. Department of Defense itself was famously unable in 1998 to report the whereabouts of "56 airplanes, 32 tanks and 36 Javelin command launch units".)<ref>{{cite news|title=Government’s financial systems fall flat |publisher=Government Computer News |date=[[2000-06-24]]|url=http://www.gcn.com/print/vol19_no20a/2482-1.html}}</ref>
Line 82: Line 82:
In Europe the [[peace movement]] was very strong.<ref>{{cite news|title=Millions march against war |publisher=Boston.Com |date=[[2003-02-16]] |url=http://www.boston.com/news/packages/iraq/globe_stories/021603_marches.htm}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=No reason to rest |publisher=Al-Ahram Weekly |date=[[2004-04-08]] to [[2004-04-14]] |url=http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2004/685/re1.htm}}</ref> Ten NATO member countries did not join the coalition with the U.S., and their leaders made public statements in opposition to the invasion of Iraq.{{fact}} Public perceptions of the U.S. changed dramatically as a consequence of the invasion.<ref>{{cite news|title=America's Image Further Erodes, Europeans Want Weaker Ties |publisher=The Pew Research Center |date=[[2003-03-18]]|url=http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=175}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=A Year After Iraq War: Mistrust of America in Europe Ever Higher, Muslim Anger Persists|publisher=The Pew Research Center |date=[[2004-03-16]]|url=http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=206}}</ref> Especially in [[Germany]], where three quarters of the population were opposed to the war.<ref>{{cite news|title=Analysis: Germany finds a voice |publisher=BBC |date=[[2003-02-03]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2720317.stm}}</ref>
In Europe the [[peace movement]] was very strong.<ref>{{cite news|title=Millions march against war |publisher=Boston.Com |date=[[2003-02-16]] |url=http://www.boston.com/news/packages/iraq/globe_stories/021603_marches.htm}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=No reason to rest |publisher=Al-Ahram Weekly |date=[[2004-04-08]] to [[2004-04-14]] |url=http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2004/685/re1.htm}}</ref> Ten NATO member countries did not join the coalition with the U.S., and their leaders made public statements in opposition to the invasion of Iraq.{{fact}} Public perceptions of the U.S. changed dramatically as a consequence of the invasion.<ref>{{cite news|title=America's Image Further Erodes, Europeans Want Weaker Ties |publisher=The Pew Research Center |date=[[2003-03-18]]|url=http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=175}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=A Year After Iraq War: Mistrust of America in Europe Ever Higher, Muslim Anger Persists|publisher=The Pew Research Center |date=[[2004-03-16]]|url=http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=206}}</ref> Especially in [[Germany]], where three quarters of the population were opposed to the war.<ref>{{cite news|title=Analysis: Germany finds a voice |publisher=BBC |date=[[2003-02-03]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2720317.stm}}</ref>


Other possible U.S. objectives, denied by the U.S. government but acknowledged by Retired U.S. General Jay Garner, included the establishment of permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq as a way of projecting power (creating a credible threat of U.S. military intervention) to the oil-rich Gulf region and the Middle East generally. Jay Garner, who was in charge of planning and administering post-war reconstruction in Iraq, explained that the U.S. occupation of Iraq was comparable to the Philippine model: "Look back on the Philippines around the turn of the 20th century: they were a coaling station for the navy, and that allowed us to keep a great presence in the Pacific. That's what Iraq is for the next few decades: our coaling station that gives us great presence in the Middle East";<ref>{{cite news|title=Bush Lies Uncovered |publisher=AlterNet |date=[[2004-02-23]] |url=http://www.alternet.org/story/17923/}}</ref> (See also [[Philippine-American War]]). Its noted retired U.S. General Jay Garner was replaced by Paul Bremer after reports came out of his position in SY Coleman, a division of defense contractor L-3 Communications specializing in missile- defense systems. It was believed his role in the company was in contention with his role in Iraq.<ref>{{cite news|title=General reverses his role |publisher=The San Francisco Chronicle |date=[[2003-02-26]] |url=http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/02/26/BU48310.DTL}}</ref> The House Appropriations Committee, said of the report accompanying the emergency spending legislation was "of a magnitude normally associated with permanent bases."<ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq bases spur questions over US plans |publisher=BBC |date=[[2006-03-30]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4834032.stm}}</ref>
Other possible U.S. objectives, denied by the U.S. government but acknowledged by retired U.S. General Jay Garner, included the establishment of permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq as a way of projecting power (creating a credible threat of U.S. military intervention) to the oil-rich Gulf region and the Middle East generally. Jay Garner, who was in charge of planning and administering post-war reconstruction in Iraq, explained that the U.S. occupation of Iraq was comparable to the [[Philippine]] model: "Look back on the Philippines around the turn of the 20th century: they were a coaling station for the navy, and that allowed us to keep a great presence in the Pacific. That's what Iraq is for the next few decades: our coaling station that gives us great presence in the Middle East";<ref>{{cite news|title=Bush Lies Uncovered |publisher=AlterNet |date=[[2004-02-23]] |url=http://www.alternet.org/story/17923/}}</ref> (See also [[Philippine-American War]]). Garner was replaced by Paul Bremer after reports came out of his position in SY Coleman, a division of defense contractor L-3 Communications specializing in missile-defense systems. It was believed his role in the company was in contention with his role in Iraq.<ref>{{cite news|title=General reverses his role |publisher=The San Francisco Chronicle |date=[[2003-02-26]] |url=http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/02/26/BU48310.DTL}}</ref> The House Appropriations Committee said the report accompanying the emergency spending legislation was "of a magnitude normally associated with permanent bases."<ref>{{cite news|title=Iraq bases spur questions over US plans |publisher=BBC |date=[[2006-03-30]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4834032.stm}}</ref>


However, the U.S. House of Representatives voted in [[2006]] to not fund any permanent bases in [[Iraq]].<ref>{{cite news|title=The Will of the People’s House Is Clear: No Permanent Bases in Iraq |publisher=U.S. House of Representatives: Tom Allen Homepage |url=http://tomallen.house.gov/article.asp?id=647}}</ref>
However, the U.S. House of Representatives voted in [[2006]] to not fund any permanent bases in [[Iraq]].<ref>{{cite news|title=The Will of the People’s House Is Clear: No Permanent Bases in Iraq |publisher=U.S. House of Representatives: Tom Allen Homepage |url=http://tomallen.house.gov/article.asp?id=647}}</ref>
Line 100: Line 100:
{{main|2003 invasion of Iraq}}
{{main|2003 invasion of Iraq}}


The '''2003 invasion of Iraq''', the second Gulf war was termed "Operation Iraqi Freedom" by the US administration, began on [[March 19]]. They cooperated with Kurdish forces in the north which numbered upwards of 50,000.{{cn}} Other nations also participated in part of a coalition force to help with the operation by providing equipment, services and security as well special forces. The 2003 Iraq invasion marked the beginning of what is commonly referred to as the Iraq War.
The '''2003 invasion of Iraq''', the second Gulf war was termed "Operation Iraqi Freedom" by the US administration, and began on [[March 19]]. They cooperated with Kurdish forces in the north which numbered upwards of 50,000.{{cn}} Other nations also participated in part of a coalition force to help with the operation by providing equipment, services and security as well special forces. The 2003 Iraq invasion marked the beginning of what is commonly referred to as the Iraq War.


===Troop Deployment===
===Troop Deployment===
Line 109: Line 109:
On [[May 1]], [[2003]], President Bush made a dramatic visit to the [[aircraft carrier]] [[U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln]] while the ship was a few miles west of [[San Diego, California|San Diego]]. The Lincoln was on its way home to [[Everett, Washington]] from a long deployment which had included service in the [[Persian Gulf]]. The visit climaxed at sunset with his now-legendary "[[Mission Accomplished]]" speech. This nationally-televised speech was delivered before the [[sailors]] and [[airmen]] on the [[flight deck]]. Bush essentially declared victory at this time (even though, admittedly, [[Saddam Hussein]] was still at large and significant pockets of resistance remained plus more resistance would form for years to come.)
On [[May 1]], [[2003]], President Bush made a dramatic visit to the [[aircraft carrier]] [[U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln]] while the ship was a few miles west of [[San Diego, California|San Diego]]. The Lincoln was on its way home to [[Everett, Washington]] from a long deployment which had included service in the [[Persian Gulf]]. The visit climaxed at sunset with his now-legendary "[[Mission Accomplished]]" speech. This nationally-televised speech was delivered before the [[sailors]] and [[airmen]] on the [[flight deck]]. Bush essentially declared victory at this time (even though, admittedly, [[Saddam Hussein]] was still at large and significant pockets of resistance remained plus more resistance would form for years to come.)


In May of 2003, after the defeat of Iraq's conventional forces, the coalition military noticed a gradually increasing flurry of attacks on the multinational troops in various regions, such as the "[[Sunni Triangle]]". In the initial chaos after the fall of the Iraqi government, there was massive looting of infrastructure including; government buildings, official residences, museums, banks, and military depots. According to the Pentagon, 250,000 tons (of 650,000 tons total) of ordnance was looted, providing a significant source of ammunition for the Iraqi insurgency. The hundreds of weapons caches already created by the conventional Iraqi army and Republican Guard further strengthened these looted supplies for the insurgents.
In May of 2003, after the defeat of Iraq's conventional forces, the coalition military noticed a gradually increasing flurry of attacks on the multinational troops in various regions, such as the "[[Sunni Triangle]]". In the initial chaos after the fall of the Iraqi government, there was massive looting of infrastructure, including government buildings, official residences, museums, banks, and military depots. According to [[The Pentagon]], 250,000 tons (of 650,000 tons total) of ordnance was looted, providing a significant source of ammunition for the [[Iraqi insurgency]]. The hundreds of weapons caches already created by the conventional Iraqi army and Republican Guard further strengthened these looted supplies for the insurgents.


At first the resistance stemmed from [[fedayeen]] and Saddam Hussein or Ba'ath loyalists, but soon religious radicals and Iraqis angered by the occupation contributed to the insurgency. In late 2004, foreign fighters from around the Middle East as well as al-Qaeda operatives led by [[Abu Musab al-Zarqawi]] would help to fund and coordinate the insurgency. The insurgents are generally known to the Coalition forces as Anti-Iraqi Forces or AIF.
At first the resistance stemmed from [[fedayeen]] and loyalists of Saddam Hussein or the [[Ba'ath Party]],{{fact}} but soon religious radicals and Iraqis angered by the occupation contributed to the insurgency. In late 2004, foreign fighters from around the Middle East as well as [[Al-Qaeda in Iraq]] (a group that is separate from [[al-Qaeda]] but which changed its name for propaganda purposes), led by [[Abu Musab al-Zarqawi]] would help to drive the insurgency. The insurgents are generally known to the Coalition forces as "Anti-Iraqi Forces."


The initial [[Iraqi insurgency|insurgency in Iraq]] was concentrated in, but not limited to, an area referred to by Western media and the occupying forces as the ''Sunni triangle''. This location includes Baghdad.<ref>{{cite news|title=Operation Iraqi Freedom Maps |publisher=GlobalSecurity.Org |date=Unavailable |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraqi_freedom-ops-maps.htm}}</ref> The three provinces that had the highest number of attacks were Baghdad, Anbar, and Salah Ad Din--these provinces account for 35% of the population. This resistance has been described as a type of [[guerrilla warfare]]. Insurgent tactics include mortars, [[suicide bombers]], [[improvised explosive devices]], roadside bombs, small arms fire, and RPGs, as well as sabotage against the oil, water, and electrical infrastructure.
The initial [[Iraqi insurgency|insurgency in Iraq]] was concentrated in, but not limited to, an area referred to by Western media and the occupying forces as the ''Sunni triangle''. This location includes Baghdad.<ref>{{cite news|title=Operation Iraqi Freedom Maps |publisher=GlobalSecurity.Org |date=Unavailable |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraqi_freedom-ops-maps.htm}}</ref> The three provinces that had the highest number of attacks were Baghdad, Anbar, and Salah Ad Din--these provinces account for 35% of the population. This resistance has been described as a type of [[guerrilla warfare]]. Insurgent tactics include mortars, [[suicide bombers]], [[improvised explosive devices]], roadside bombs, small arms fire, and RPGs, as well as sabotage against the oil, water, and electrical infrastructure.
Line 118: Line 118:
{{main|Post-invasion Iraq, 2003–2006}}
{{main|Post-invasion Iraq, 2003–2006}}


The ''[[post-invasion Iraq, 2003–2006|post-invasion environment]]'' began after the Hussein regime had been overthrown. It centers on Coalition and U.N. efforts to establish a [[democratic]] state capable of defending itself,<ref name=Soriano>{{cite news|title=Poll: Iraqis out of patience |publisher=USA Today |date=[[2004-04-30]] |url=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/1/13/232154.shtml}}</ref> versus various insurgent demands that the foreign forces leave the country.
The ''[[post-invasion Iraq, 2003–2006|post-invasion environment]]'' began after the Hussein regime had been overthrown. It centers on Coalition and U.N. efforts to establish a stable [[democracy|democratic]] state capable of defending itself<ref name=Soriano>{{cite news|title=Poll: Iraqis out of patience |publisher=USA Today |date=[[2004-04-30]] |url=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/1/13/232154.shtml}}</ref> and holding itself together<ref>{{cite news|title=Gloom descends on Iraqi leaders as civil war looms|url=http://today.reuters.co.uk/misc/PrinterFriendlyPopup.aspx?type=reutersEdge&storyID=2006-07-21T131602Z_01_NOA147743_RTRUKOC_0_FEATURE-IRAQ.xml}}</ref> and overcoming insurgent attacks and internal divisions.


Coalition military forces launched several operations around Tigris River peninsula and in the Sunni Triangle. A series of similar operations were launched throughout the summer in the Sunni Triangle. Toward the end of 2003, the intensity and pace of insurgent attacks began to increase. A sharp surge in guerrilla attacks ushered in an insurgent effort that was termed the "[[Ramadan Offensive]]", as it coincided with the beginning of the Muslim holy month of [[Ramadan]]. Coalition forces brought to bear the use of air power for the first time since the end of the war.
Coalition military forces launched several operations around Tigris River peninsula and in the Sunni Triangle. A series of similar operations were launched throughout the summer in the Sunni Triangle. Toward the end of 2003, the intensity and pace of insurgent attacks began to increase. A sharp surge in guerrilla attacks ushered in an insurgent effort that was termed the "[[Ramadan Offensive]]", as it coincided with the beginning of the Muslim holy month of [[Ramadan]]. Coalition forces brought to bear the use of air power for the first time since the end of the invasion.


Suspected ambush sites and mortar launching positions struck from the air and with artillery fire. Surveillance of major routes, patrols, and raids on suspected insurgents were stepped up. In addition, two villages, including Saddam’s birthplace of al-Auja and the small town of Abu Hishma were wrapped in barbed wire and carefully monitored. On [[July 22]], [[2003]], during a raid by the U.S. [[101st Airborne Division]] and soldiers from [[Task Force 20]], Saddam Hussein's sons ([[Uday Hussein|Uday]] and [[Qusay Hussein|Qusay]]) and one of his grandsons were killed.
Suspected ambush sites and mortar launching positions struck from the air and with artillery fire. Surveillance of major routes, patrols, and raids on suspected insurgents were stepped up. In addition, two villages, including Saddam’s birthplace of al-Auja and the small town of Abu Hishma were wrapped in barbed wire and carefully monitored. On [[July 22]], [[2003]], during a raid by the U.S. [[101st Airborne Division]] and soldiers from [[Task Force 20]], Saddam Hussein's sons ([[Uday Hussein|Uday]] and [[Qusay Hussein|Qusay]]) and one of his grandsons were killed.
Line 168: Line 168:
===Late 2003===
===Late 2003===
[[Image:Baghdadbox.png|thumb|right|350px|US Army in Baghdad.]]
[[Image:Baghdadbox.png|thumb|right|350px|US Army in Baghdad.]]
With the capture of Saddam and a drop in the number of insurgent attacks (an average of 18 a day), some concluded the multinational forces were prevailing in the fight against the insurgency. With the weather growing cooler, United States forces were able to operate in full armor which reduced their casualty rate. The provisional government began training a security force intended to defend critical infrastructure, and the United States promised over $20 billion in reconstruction money in the form of credit against Iraq's future oil revenues. Of this, less than half a billion dollars had been spent in 10 months after it had been promised. Oil revenues were also claimed to be used for rebuilding schools and for work on the electrical and refining infrastructure.
With the capture of Saddam and a drop in the number of insurgent attacks (an average of 18 a day), some concluded the multinational forces were prevailing in the fight against the insurgency. With the weather growing cooler, Coalition forces were able to operate in full armor which reduced their casualty rate. The provisional government began training a security force intended to defend critical infrastructure, and the United States promised over $20 billion in reconstruction money in the form of credit against Iraq's future oil revenues. Of this, less than half a billion dollars had been spent in 10 months after it had been promised. Oil revenues were also used for rebuilding schools and for work on the electrical and refining infrastructure.


However, the failure to restore basic services to above pre-war levels, where over a decade of sanctions, bombing, corruption, and decaying infrastructure had left major cities functioning at much-reduced levels, also contributed to local anger at the IPA government headed by an executive council. On [[July 2]] [[2003]], President Bush declared that American troops would remain in Iraq in spite of the attacks, challenging the opponents with "My answer is, bring 'em on," a line the President later expressed misgivings about having used. <ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/1/13/232154.shtml | title=President Regrets 'Bring 'Em On' | publisher=NewsMax.com Wires |date=[[2005-01-14]] | accessdate=2006-09-01}}</ref> In the summer of 2003, the multinational forces focused on hunting down the remaining leaders of the former regime, culminating in the shooting deaths of Saddam's two sons in July. In all, over 300 top leaders of the former regime were killed or captured, as well as numerous lesser functionaries and military personnel.
However, the failure to restore basic services to above pre-war levels, where over a decade of sanctions, bombing, corruption, and decaying infrastructure had left major cities functioning at much-reduced levels, also contributed to local anger at the IPA government headed by an executive council. On [[July 2]] [[2003]], President Bush declared that American troops would remain in Iraq in spite of the attacks, challenging the insurgents with "My answer is, bring 'em on," a line the President later expressed misgivings about having used. <ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/1/13/232154.shtml | title=President Regrets 'Bring 'Em On' | publisher=NewsMax.com Wires |date=[[2005-01-14]] | accessdate=2006-09-01}}</ref> In the summer of 2003, the multinational forces focused on hunting down the remaining leaders of the former regime, culminating in the shooting deaths of Saddam's two sons in July. In all, over 300 top leaders of the former regime were killed or captured, as well as numerous lesser functionaries and military personnel.


Shortly after the capture of Saddam, elements left out of the [[Coalition Provisional Authority]] began to agitate for elections and the formation of a [[Iraqi Interim Government]]. Most prominent among these was the Shia cleric [[Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani|Ali al-Sistani]]. More insurgents stepped up their activities. The two most turbulent centers were the area around Fallujah and the poor Shia sections of cities from Baghdad to Basra in the south.
Shortly after the capture of Saddam, elements left out of the [[Coalition Provisional Authority]] began to agitate for elections and the formation of an [[Iraqi Interim Government]]. Most prominent among these was the [[Shia Islam|Shia]] cleric [[Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani|Ali al-Sistani]]. More insurgents stepped up their activities. The two most turbulent centers were the area around Fallujah and the poor Shia sections of cities from Baghdad to Basra in the south.
{{col-begin}}
{{col-begin}}
{{col-break}}
{{col-break}}
Line 212: Line 212:
{{col-end}}
{{col-end}}


The coalition and the Coalition Provisional Authority decided to face the growing insurgency with a pair of assaults: one on [[Fallujah]], the center of the "Mohammed's Army of Al-Ansar", and another on [[Najaf]], home of an important mosque that had become the focal point for the [[Mahdi Army]] and its activities. Just before the [[US occupation of Fallujah|attack on Fallujah]], four [[private military contractor]]s, working for [[Blackwater USA]], were [[ambush]]ed and their corpses [[Mutilation|mutilate]]d by a large crowd, receiving a great deal of media attention. The attention elicited a violent reaction from Donald Rumsfeld who then ordered LtGen Conway to immediately attack Fallujah at the earliest opportunity.
The coalition and the Coalition Provisional Authority decided to face the growing insurgency with a pair of assaults: one on [[Fallujah]], the center of the "Mohammed's Army of Al-Ansar", and another on [[Najaf]], home of an important mosque that had become the focal point for the [[Mahdi Army]] and its activities. Just before the [[US occupation of Fallujah|attack on Fallujah]], four [[private military contractor]]s, working for [[Blackwater USA]], were [[ambush]]ed and their corpses [[Mutilation|mutilate]]d by a large crowd, receiving a great deal of media attention. The attention elicited a violent reaction from Donald Rumsfeld who then ordered Lt. General Conway to attack Fallujah at the earliest opportunity.


After this incident, the [[1st Marine Expeditionary Force]] began plans to re-establish a coalition presence in Fallujah. On April 4, the [[Operation Vigilant Resolve|multinational forces began assaults to clear Fallujah of insurgents]]. On April 9, the multinational force allowed more than 70,000 women, children and elderly residents to leave the besieged city, reportedly also allowing males of military age to leave. Meanwhile, insurgents were taking advantage of the lull in combat to prepare defenses for a second assault. On April 10, the military declared a unilateral truce to allow for humanitarian supplies to enter Fallujah. Troops pulled back to the outskirts of the city; local leaders reciprocated the ceasefire, although lower-level intense fighting on both sides continued.
After this incident, the [[1st Marine Expeditionary Force]] began plans to re-establish a coalition presence in Fallujah. On April 4, the [[Operation Vigilant Resolve|multinational forces began assaults to clear Fallujah of insurgents]]. On April 9, the multinational force allowed more than 70,000 women, children and elderly residents to leave the besieged city, reportedly also allowing males of military age to leave. Meanwhile, insurgents were taking advantage of the lull in combat to prepare defenses for a second assault. On April 10, the military declared a unilateral truce to allow for humanitarian supplies to enter Fallujah. Troops pulled back to the outskirts of the city; local leaders reciprocated the ceasefire, although lower-level intense fighting on both sides continued.


The usage by the U.S. of [[white phosphorus (weapon)|white phosphorus]] in Fallujah attracted controversy. In the documentary "Fallujah: The Hidden Massacre", aired on the Italian state television network RAI, a former soldier testified "I saw the burned bodies of women and children. The phosphorus explodes and forms a plume. Who ever is within a 150 metre radius has no hope."<ref>{{cite news|title=Did the US military use chemical weapons in Iraq? |publisher=The Christian Science Monitor |date=[[2005-11-08]] |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1108/dailyUpdate.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Fallujah: The Hidden Massacre" on the U.S. Use of Napalm-Like White Phosphorus Bombs |publisher=DemocracyNow.Org |date=[[2005-11-08]] |url=http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/08/1516227}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/inchiesta/video/fallujah_ING.wmv| title=fallujah_ING| publisher=Rainews24.rai.it| format=WMV}}</ref> The US State department first dismissed such claims,<ref>{{cite news|title=Did the U.S. Use "Illegal" Weapons in Fallujah? |publisher=U.S. Department of State |date=[[2004-11-12]] |url=http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive_Index/Illegal_Weapons_in_Fallujah.html}}</ref> but was later corrected in other reports. Lt Col Barry Venable stated to BBC, "it is an incendiary weapon and may be used against enemy combatants." According to Protocol III of Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, white phosphorus can be used, but only against enemy combatants and not civilians.<ref>{{cite news|title=US used white phosphorus in Iraq |publisher=BBC |date=[[2005-11-16]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4440664.stm}}</ref> The Independent later reported that "there remain widespread reports of civilians suffering extensive burn injuries. While US commanders insist they always strive to avoid civilian casualties, the story of the battle of Fallujah highlights the intrinsic difficulty of such an endeavour."<ref>{{cite news|title=The Fog of War: White Phosphorus, Fallujah and Some Burning Questions |publisher=CommonDreams.Org |date=[[2005-11-15]] |url=http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1115-03.htm}}</ref>
The usage by the U.S. of [[white phosphorus (weapon)|white phosphorus]] in Fallujah attracted controversy. In the documentary "Fallujah: The Hidden Massacre", aired on the Italian state television network RAI, a former soldier testified "I saw the burned bodies of women and children. The phosphorus explodes and forms a plume. Who ever is within a 150 metre radius has no hope."<ref>{{cite news|title=Did the US military use chemical weapons in Iraq? |publisher=The Christian Science Monitor |date=[[2005-11-08]] |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1108/dailyUpdate.html}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Fallujah: The Hidden Massacre" on the U.S. Use of Napalm-Like White Phosphorus Bombs |publisher=DemocracyNow.Org |date=[[2005-11-08]] |url=http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/08/1516227}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.rainews24.rai.it/ran24/inchiesta/video/fallujah_ING.wmv| title=fallujah_ING| publisher=Rainews24.rai.it| format=WMV}}</ref> The US State department first dismissed such claims,<ref>{{cite news|title=Did the U.S. Use "Illegal" Weapons in Fallujah? |publisher=U.S. Department of State |date=[[2004-11-12]] |url=http://usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive_Index/Illegal_Weapons_in_Fallujah.html}}</ref> but was later corrected in other reports. Lt Col Barry Venable stated to the BBC, "it is an incendiary weapon and may be used against enemy combatants." According to Protocol III of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, white phosphorus can be used, but only against enemy combatants and not civilians.<ref>{{cite news|title=US used white phosphorus in Iraq |publisher=BBC |date=[[2005-11-16]] |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4440664.stm}}</ref> ''The Independent'' later reported that "there remain widespread reports of civilians suffering extensive burn injuries. While US commanders insist they always strive to avoid civilian casualties, the story of the battle of Fallujah highlights the intrinsic difficulty of such an endeavour."<ref>{{cite news|title=The Fog of War: White Phosphorus, Fallujah and Some Burning Questions |publisher=CommonDreams.Org |date=[[2005-11-15]] |url=http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1115-03.htm}}</ref>


When the Iraqi Governing Council protested against the US assault to retake Fallujah [[Operation Vigilant Resolve]], the US military halted its efforts. In the April battle for Fallujah, Coalition troops killed about 600 insurgents and a number of civilians, while 40 Americans died and hundreds were wounded in a fierce battle. The Marines were ordered to stand-down and cordon off the city, maintaining a perimeter around Fallujah. A compromise was reached in order to ensure security within Fallujah itself by creating the local "[[Fallujah Brigade]]". While the Marines attacking had clear superiority in ground firepower and air support, LtGen Conway decided to accept a truce and a deal which put a former Baathist general in complete charge of the town's security. The Fallujah Brigade's responsibility was to secure Fallujah and put a stop to insurgent mortar attacks on the nearby U.S. Marine bases. This compromise soon fell apart and insurgent attacks returned, causing Marine commanders to begin preparations for a second attack in the coming fall. By the end of the spring uprising, the cities of Fallujah, Samarra, Baquba, and Ramadi had been left under guerrilla control with coalition patrols in the cities at a minimum.{{fact}}
When the Iraqi Governing Council protested against the US assault to retake Fallujah, the US military halted its efforts. In the April battle for Fallujah, Coalition troops killed about 600 insurgents and a number of civilians, while 40 Americans died and hundreds were wounded in a fierce battle. The Marines were ordered to stand-down and cordon off the city, maintaining a perimeter around Fallujah. A compromise was reached in order to ensure security within Fallujah itself by creating the local "[[Fallujah Brigade]]". While the Marines attacking had a clear advantage in ground firepower and air support, LtGen Conway decided to accept a truce and a deal which put a former Baathist general in complete charge of the town's security. The Fallujah Brigade's responsibility was to secure Fallujah and put a stop to insurgent mortar attacks on the nearby U.S. Marine bases. This compromise soon fell apart and insurgent attacks returned, causing Marine commanders to begin preparations for a second attack in the coming fall. By the end of the spring uprising, the cities of Fallujah, Samarra, Baquba, and Ramadi had been left under guerrilla control with coalition patrols in the cities at a minimum.{{fact}}


=== Early-mid 2004 &ndash; the Shi'ite south ===
=== Early-mid 2004 &ndash; the Shi'ite south ===
Meanwhile, the fighting continued in the Shiite south, and Italian and Polish forces were having increasing difficulties retaining control over [[Nasiriya]] and [[Najaf]]. United States marines were then shifted there to put down the overt rebellion and proceeded to rout Sadr's Shiite Militia. In all, April, May and early June saw more fighting. Over the next three months, the multinanational forces took back the southern cities. Also, various insurgent leaders entered into negotiations with the provisional government to lay down arms and enter the political process.
Meanwhile, the fighting continued in the Shiite south, and Italian and Polish forces were having increasing difficulties retaining control over [[Nasiriya]] and [[Najaf]]. United States Marines were then shifted there to put down the overt rebellion and proceeded to rout [[Muqtada al-Sadr]]'s Shiite militia. In all, April, May and early June saw more fighting. Over the next three months, the multinational forces took back the southern cities. Also, various insurgent leaders entered into negotiations with the provisional government to lay down arms and enter the political process.
{{col-begin}}
{{col-begin}}
{{col-break}}
{{col-break}}
Line 259: Line 259:
:''Main article: [[Iraqi insurgency#Iraqi coalition counter-insurgency operations|Iraqi coalition counter-insurgency operations]]
:''Main article: [[Iraqi insurgency#Iraqi coalition counter-insurgency operations|Iraqi coalition counter-insurgency operations]]


Toward the end of June 2004, the [[Coalition Provisional Authority]] transferred the "[[sovereignty]]" of Iraq to a caretaker government, whose first act was to begin the trial of Saddam Hussein. However, fighting continued in the form of an insurgent [[rebellion]] against the new sovereignty, with some parts composed of non-Iraqi [[Islam|Muslim]] [[militant]] groups like [[al Qaeda]]. The new government began the process of moving towards open elections, though the insurgency and the lack of cohesion within the government itself, has lead to delays. Militia leader [[Muqtada al-Sadr]] took control of Najaf and, after negotiations broke down, the government asked the United States for help dislodging him. Through the months of July and August, a series of skirmishes in and around Najaf culminated with the [[Imam Ali Mosque]] itself under siege, only to have a peace deal brokered by [[Grand Ayatollah]] [[Sistani]] in late August. The new Iraq Grain Board has started to import [[wheat]] from [[Australia Wheat Board]] which had been long banned and disgraced by [[Hussein]].<ref>{{cite news|title=Australian wheat export to Iraq resumes |publisher=The Sydney Morning Herald |date=[[2006-07-06]] |url=http://www.smh.com.au/news/Business/Australian-wheat-export-to-Iraq-resumes/2006/07/06/1152158274556.html}}</ref>
Toward the end of June 2004, the [[Coalition Provisional Authority]] transferred the "[[sovereignty]]" of Iraq to a caretaker government, whose first act was to begin the trial of Saddam Hussein. However, fighting continued in the form of the [[Iraqi insurgency]]. The new government began the process of moving towards open elections, though the insurgency and the lack of cohesion within the government itself, has led to delays. Militia leader [[Muqtada al-Sadr]] took control of [[Najaf]] and, after negotiations broke down, the government asked the United States for help dislodging him. Through the months of July and August, a series of skirmishes in and around Najaf culminated with the [[Imam Ali Mosque]] itself under siege, only to have a peace deal brokered by [[Grand Ayatollah]] [[Sistani]] in late August. The new Iraq Grain Board has started to import [[wheat]] from [[Australia Wheat Board]] which had been long banned by [[Saddam Hussein]].<ref>{{cite news|title=Australian wheat export to Iraq resumes |publisher=The Sydney Morning Herald |date=[[2006-07-06]] |url=http://www.smh.com.au/news/Business/Australian-wheat-export-to-Iraq-resumes/2006/07/06/1152158274556.html}}</ref>


==2005==
==2005==
===Iraqi elections and aftermath===
===Iraqi elections and aftermath===
{{main|Iraqi legislative election, 2005}}
{{main|Iraqi legislative election, 2005}}
On [[31 January]], an [[Iraqi legislative election, 2005|election]] for a government to draft a permanent constitution took place. Although some violence and lack of widespread Sunni Arab participation marred the event, most of the eligible Kurd and Shia populace participated. On [[4 February]], [[Paul Wolfowitz]] announced that 15,000 U.S. troops whose tours of duty had been extended in order to provide election security would be pulled out of Iraq by the next month. <ref>"''[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4235787.stm U.S. to pull out 15,000 from Iraq]; The U.S. is to withdraw about 15,000 troops from Iraq from next month, the deputy defence secretary has announced''". BBC News, [[4 February]] [[2005]].</ref>February, March and April proved to be relatively peaceful months compared to the carnage of November and January, with insurgent attacks averaging 30 a day from the average 70.
On [[January 31]], an [[Iraqi legislative election, 2005|election]] for a government to draft a permanent constitution took place. Although some violence and lack of widespread Sunni Arab participation marred the event, most of the eligible Kurd and Shia populace participated. On [[February 4]], [[Paul Wolfowitz]] announced that 15,000 U.S. troops whose tours of duty had been extended in order to provide election security would be pulled out of Iraq by the next month. <ref>"''[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4235787.stm U.S. to pull out 15,000 from Iraq]; The U.S. is to withdraw about 15,000 troops from Iraq from next month, the deputy defence secretary has announced''". BBC News, [[4 February]] [[2005]].</ref>February, March and April proved to be relatively peaceful months compared to the carnage of November and January, with insurgent attacks averaging 30 a day from the prior average of 70.


Hopes for a quick end to an insurgency and a withdrawal of U.S. troops were dashed at the advent of May, Iraq's bloodiest month since the invasion of U.S. forces in March and April of 2003. Suicide bombers, believed to be mainly disheartened Iraqi Sunni Arabs, Syrians and Saudis, tore through Iraq. Their targets were often Shia gatherings or civilian concentrations mainly of Shias. As a result, over 700 Iraqi civilians died in that month, as well as 79 U.S. soldiers.
Hopes for a quick end to an insurgency and a withdrawal of U.S. troops were dashed at the advent of May, Iraq's bloodiest month since the invasion by U.S. forces in March and April of 2003. Suicide bombers, believed to be mainly disheartened Iraqi Sunni Arabs, Syrians and Saudis, tore through Iraq. Their targets were often Shia gatherings or civilian concentrations mainly of Shias. As a result, over 700 Iraqi civilians died in that month, as well as 79 U.S. soldiers.


During early and mid-May, the U.S. also launched [[Operation Matador]], an assault by around 1,000 Marines in the ungoverned region of western Iraq. Its goal was the closing of suspected insurgent supply routes of volunteers and material from [[Syria]], and with the fight they received their assumption proved correct. Fighters armed with [[flak jacket]]s (unseen in the insurgency by this time) and sporting sophisticated tactics met the Marines, eventually inflicting 30 U.S. casualties by the operation's end, and suffering 125 casualties themselves. The Marines succeeded, recapturing the whole region and even fighting insurgents all the way to the Syrian border, where they were forced to stop (Syrian residents living near the border heard the American bombs very clearly during the operation). The vast majority of these armed and trained insurgents quickly dispersed before the U.S. could bring the full force of its firepower on them, as it did in Fallujah.
During early and mid-May, the U.S. also launched [[Operation Matador]], an assault by around 1,000 Marines in the ungoverned region of western Iraq. Its goal was the closing of suspected insurgent supply routes of volunteers and material from [[Syria]], and with the fight they received their assumption proved correct. Fighters armed with [[flak jacket]]s (unseen in the insurgency before this time) and using sophisticated tactics met the Marines, eventually inflicting 30 U.S. casualties by the operation's end, and suffering 125 casualties themselves. The Marines succeeded, recapturing the whole region and even fighting insurgents all the way to the Syrian border, where they were forced to stop (Syrian residents living near the border heard the American bombs very clearly during the operation). The vast majority of these armed and trained insurgents quickly dispersed before the U.S. could bring the full force of its firepower on them, as it did in Fallujah.


===Announcements and renewed fighting===
===Announcements and renewed fighting===
Line 274: Line 274:


==2006==
==2006==
The beginning of that year was marked by government creation talks and continuous anti-coalition and attacks on mainly Shia civilians.
The beginning of 2006 was marked by government creation talks, growing sectarian violence, and continuous anti-coalition attacks.


=== Al-Askari shrine bombing and Sunni-Shia fighting ===
=== Al-Askari shrine bombing and Sunni-Shia fighting ===
Line 281: Line 281:
On [[February 22]] [[2006]], at 6:55 a.m. local time (0355 UTC) two bombs were set off by five to seven men dressed as personnel of the Iraqi Special forces who entered the [[Al Askari Mosque]] during the morning. Explosions occurred at the mosque, effectively destroying its golden dome and severely damaging the mosque. Several men, one wearing a military uniform, had earlier entered the mosque, tied up the guards there and set explosives, resulting in the blast.
On [[February 22]] [[2006]], at 6:55 a.m. local time (0355 UTC) two bombs were set off by five to seven men dressed as personnel of the Iraqi Special forces who entered the [[Al Askari Mosque]] during the morning. Explosions occurred at the mosque, effectively destroying its golden dome and severely damaging the mosque. Several men, one wearing a military uniform, had earlier entered the mosque, tied up the guards there and set explosives, resulting in the blast.
[[Image:Iraqattacksasofjuly2006.JPG|550px|right| Attacks against Iraqi National and Coalition forces as of July 2006 (Data from Government Accountability Office report product no. GAO-06-1094t)]]
[[Image:Iraqattacksasofjuly2006.JPG|550px|right| Attacks against Iraqi National and Coalition forces as of July 2006 (Data from Government Accountability Office report product no. GAO-06-1094t)]]
Shiites across Iraq expressed their anger by destroying Sunni mosques and killing dozens. Religious leaders of both sides called for calm amid fears this can erupt into a long-awaited Sunni-Shia ''civil war'' in Iraq.
Shiites across Iraq expressed their anger by destroying Sunni mosques and killing dozens. Religious leaders of both sides called for calm amid fears this could erupt into a long-feared Sunni-Shia civil war in Iraq.


On March 2nd the director of the Baghdad morgue fled Iraq explaining,
On March 2 the director of the Baghdad morgue fled Iraq explaining,
"7,000 people have been killed by death squads in recent months." [http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1721366,00.html] The Boston Globe reported that around eight times the number of Iraqis killed by terrorist bombings during March 2006 were killed by sectarian death squads during the same period. A total of 1,313 were killed by sectarian militias while 173 were killed by suicide bombings.[http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2006/04/02/iraq_militias_wave_of_death/] The [[LA Times]] later reported that about 3,800 Iraqis were killed by sectarian violence in Baghdad alone during the first three months of 2006.[http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-civilians7may07,0,1349034.story] During April 2006, morgue numbers show that 1,091 Baghdad residents were killed by sectarian executions.[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4756911.stm]
"7,000 people have been killed by death squads in recent months." [http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1721366,00.html] The Boston Globe reported that around eight times the number of Iraqis killed by terrorist bombings during March 2006 were killed by sectarian death squads during the same period. A total of 1,313 were killed by sectarian militias while 173 were killed by suicide bombings.[http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2006/04/02/iraq_militias_wave_of_death/] The [[LA Times]] later reported that about 3,800 Iraqis were killed by sectarian violence in Baghdad alone during the first three months of 2006.[http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-civilians7may07,0,1349034.story] During April 2006, morgue numbers showed that 1,091 Baghdad residents were killed by sectarian executions.[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4756911.stm]
Insurgencies, frequent [[terrorism|terrorist attacks]] and sectarian violence lead to harsh criticism of US Iraq policy and fears of a failing state and [[civil war]]. The concerns were expressed by several US [[think tanks]] [http://www.brookings.edu/fp/saban/analysis/20060215_iraqreport.htm] [http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=17724&prog=zgp&proj=zme] [http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?l=1&id=3980] [http://www.boell.de/downloads/demokratiefoerderung/dobbins_americas_role.pdf] as well as the US ambassador to Iraq, [[Zalmay Khalilzad]]. [http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&hn=30700]
Insurgencies, frequent [[terrorism|terrorist attacks]] and sectarian violence led to harsh criticism of US Iraq policy and fears of a failing state and [[civil war]]. The concerns were expressed by several US [[think tanks]] [http://www.brookings.edu/fp/saban/analysis/20060215_iraqreport.htm] [http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=17724&prog=zgp&proj=zme] [http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?l=1&id=3980] [http://www.boell.de/downloads/demokratiefoerderung/dobbins_americas_role.pdf] as well as the US ambassador to Iraq, [[Zalmay Khalilzad]]. [http://www.zaman.com/?bl=international&alt=&hn=30700]


In early 2006, a handful of high ranking retired generals begin to demand Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld's resignation due in part to the aforementioned chaos that resulted from his management of the war.
In early 2006, a handful of high-ranking retired generals began to demand [[United States Secretary of Defense]] [[Donald Rumsfeld]]'s resignation due in part to the aforementioned chaos that resulted from his management of the war.


In September 2006, ''The Washington Post'' reported that the commander of the Marine forces in Iraq filed "an unusual secret report" concluding that the prospects for securing the Anbar province are dim, and that there is almost nothing the U.S. military can do to improve the political and social situation there.<ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/10/AR2006091001204.html "Situation Called Dire in West Iraq"], ''The Washington Post''</ref>
In September 2006, ''The Washington Post'' reported that the commander of the Marine forces in Iraq filed "an unusual secret report" concluding that the prospects for securing the Anbar province are dim, and that there is almost nothing the U.S. military can do to improve the political and social situation there.<ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/10/AR2006091001204.html "Situation Called Dire in West Iraq"], ''The Washington Post''</ref>


In the [[Failed States Index]] compiled by the American [[Foreign Policy]] magazine and the [[Fund for Peace]] think-tank, Iraq was rated to be world's fourth most failed state in 2006. The list was topped by [[Sudan]]. <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4964444.stm "Sudan tops 'failed states index'"],''BBC News''</ref> <ref>
Iraq was listed fourth on the 2006 [[Failed States Index]] compiled by the American [[Foreign Policy]] magazine and the [[Fund for Peace]] think-tank. The list was topped by [[Sudan]]. <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4964444.stm "Sudan tops 'failed states index'"],''BBC News''</ref> <ref>
[http://www.fundforpeace.org/programs/fsi/fsindex.php "FfP: Failed States Index"], ''The Fund for Peace''</ref>
[http://www.fundforpeace.org/programs/fsi/fsindex.php "FfP: Failed States Index"], ''The Fund for Peace''</ref>


Line 299: Line 299:


When the ruling Ba'ath party organization disintegrated after the fall of the Iraqi government, elements of the secret police and Republican Guard formed guerrilla units, since some had simply gone home rather than openly fight the multinational forces. Many of these smaller units formed the center of the initial anti-coalition insurgency, based primarily around the cities of [[Mosul]], [[Tikrit]] and Fallujah.
When the ruling Ba'ath party organization disintegrated after the fall of the Iraqi government, elements of the secret police and Republican Guard formed guerrilla units, since some had simply gone home rather than openly fight the multinational forces. Many of these smaller units formed the center of the initial anti-coalition insurgency, based primarily around the cities of [[Mosul]], [[Tikrit]] and Fallujah.

The militants and guerrilla units favored attacking unarmored vehicles and avoiding major battles. The early Iraqi insurgency was concentrated in, but not limited to, an area referred to by the Western media and the occupying forces as the [[Sunni triangle]] which includes Baghdad.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraqi_freedom-ops-maps.htm | title=Operation Iraqi Freedom Maps | publisher=GlobalSecurity.org | accessdate=2006-09-01}}</ref>
The militants and guerrilla units favored attacking unarmored vehicles and avoiding major battles. The early Iraqi insurgency was concentrated in, but not limited to, an area referred to by the Western media and the occupying forces as the [[Sunni triangle]] which includes Baghdad.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iraqi_freedom-ops-maps.htm | title=Operation Iraqi Freedom Maps | publisher=GlobalSecurity.org | accessdate=2006-09-01}}</ref>


By the fall of 2003, these [[insurgent|anti-occupation]] groups began using typical guerrilla tactics; such as ambushes, bombings, kidnappings, and [[improvised explosive device]]s. Other tactics included mortars, suicide bombers, roadside bombs, small arms fire, and RPGs, as well as [[sabotage]] against the oil, water, and electrical infrastructure. The insurgents primarily targeted civilians and secondarily checkpoints and coalition forces. The civilian death log reveals that a large majority of the deaths were by car bombs, booby traps, throat slitting, beheading and other techniques that are known to be associated with insurgents. These [[Irregular military|irregular force]]s favored attacking unarmored or lightly armored [[Humvee]] vehicles, the U.S. military's primary transport vehicle. In November 2003, some of these forces successfully attacked U.S. rotary aircraft with [[SAM-7]] missiles bought on the global black market. Insurgent groups such as the [[al-Abud Network]] have even attempted to constitute their own chemical weapons programs, attempting to weaponize traditional mortar rounds with [[ricin]] and [[Sulfur mustard|mustard toxin]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.npr.org/documents/2004/cia_wmd/vol3.pdf|publisher=Central Intelligence Agency|title=Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD.}}</ref>
By the fall of 2003, these insurgent groups began using typical guerrilla tactics such as ambushes, bombings, kidnappings, and [[improvised explosive device]]s. Other tactics included mortars, suicide bombers, roadside bombs, small arms fire, and RPGs, as well as [[sabotage]] against the oil, water, and electrical infrastructure. The insurgents primarily targeted civilians and secondarily checkpoints and coalition forces. The civilian death log reveals that a large majority of the deaths were by car bombs, booby traps, throat slitting, beheading and other techniques that are known to be associated with insurgents.{{fact}} These [[Irregular military|irregular force]]s favored attacking unarmored or lightly armored [[Humvee]] vehicles, the U.S. military's primary transport vehicle. In November 2003, some of these forces successfully attacked U.S. rotary aircraft with [[SAM-7]] missiles bought on the global black market. Insurgent groups such as the [[al-Abud Network]] have even attempted to constitute their own chemical weapons programs, attempting to weaponize traditional mortar rounds with [[ricin]] and [[Sulfur mustard|mustard toxin]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.npr.org/documents/2004/cia_wmd/vol3.pdf|publisher=Central Intelligence Agency|title=Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD.}}</ref>


[[Image:iraq1.png|thumb|350px|Civilian deaths attributable to insurgent or military action in Iraq between January 1, 2003 and July 20, 2006 (Data from IraqBodyCount.org)]]
[[Image:iraq1.png|thumb|350px|Civilian deaths attributable to insurgent or military action in Iraq between January 1, 2003 and July 20, 2006 (Data from IraqBodyCount.org)]]
Line 307: Line 308:
There is evidence that some guerrilla groups are organized, perhaps by the fedayeen and other Saddam Hussein or Ba'ath loyalists, religious radicals, Iraqis angered by the occupation, and foreign fighters.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=guerrilla30&date=20030630|title=Iraqi attacks could signal wide revolt|publisher=The Seattle Times|date=[[2003-06-30]]}}</ref> On [[February 23]], [[2005]] Al-Iraqiya TV (Iraq) aired transcripts of confessions by Syrian intelligence officer Anas Ahmad Al-Issa and Iraqi insurgent Shihab Al-Sab'awi concerning their booby-trap operations, explosions, kidnappings, assassinations, and details of beheading training in Syria. <ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=571|publisher=Al-Iraqiya TV (Iraq)|title=Syrian Intelligence Officer and Top Iraqi Terrorist Reveal Beheading Training in Syria (Short Version) |date=[[2005-02-23]]}}</ref> The insurgents are known by the Coalition military (especially in the United States armed forces) as ''Anti-Iraqi Forces'' (AIF).<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.google.com/search?num=25&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=&as_sitesearch=.mil&as_q=Anti-Iraqi%20Forces | title=Anti-Iraqi Forces site:.mil| publisher=Google Search}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.google.com/search?q=%22anti-iraqi+forces%22+site:mod.uk&hl=en&lr=&as_qdr=all&filter=0| title="anti-iraqi forces" site:mod.uk| publisher=Google Search}}</ref>
There is evidence that some guerrilla groups are organized, perhaps by the fedayeen and other Saddam Hussein or Ba'ath loyalists, religious radicals, Iraqis angered by the occupation, and foreign fighters.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=guerrilla30&date=20030630|title=Iraqi attacks could signal wide revolt|publisher=The Seattle Times|date=[[2003-06-30]]}}</ref> On [[February 23]], [[2005]] Al-Iraqiya TV (Iraq) aired transcripts of confessions by Syrian intelligence officer Anas Ahmad Al-Issa and Iraqi insurgent Shihab Al-Sab'awi concerning their booby-trap operations, explosions, kidnappings, assassinations, and details of beheading training in Syria. <ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=571|publisher=Al-Iraqiya TV (Iraq)|title=Syrian Intelligence Officer and Top Iraqi Terrorist Reveal Beheading Training in Syria (Short Version) |date=[[2005-02-23]]}}</ref> The insurgents are known by the Coalition military (especially in the United States armed forces) as ''Anti-Iraqi Forces'' (AIF).<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.google.com/search?num=25&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=&as_sitesearch=.mil&as_q=Anti-Iraqi%20Forces | title=Anti-Iraqi Forces site:.mil| publisher=Google Search}}</ref><ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.google.com/search?q=%22anti-iraqi+forces%22+site:mod.uk&hl=en&lr=&as_qdr=all&filter=0| title="anti-iraqi forces" site:mod.uk| publisher=Google Search}}</ref>


A 2005 Human Rights Watch report analysed the insurgency in Iraq and highlighted, "The groups that are most responsible for the abuse, namely al-Qaeda in Iraq, Ansar al-Sunna and the Islamic Army in Iraq, have all targeted civilians for abductions and executions. The first two groups have repeatedly boasted about massive car bombs and suicide bombs in mosques, markets, bus stations and other civilian areas. Such acts are war crimes and in some cases may constitute crimes against humanity, which are defined as serious crimes committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population."<ref name="Human Rights Watch">{{cite web | url=http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2005/10/03/iraq11804.htm |title=Iraq: Insurgent Groups Responsible for War Crimes | publisher=Human Rights News | date=[[2005-10-03]] | accessdate=2006-08-29}}</ref>
A 2005 [[Human Rights Watch]] report analysed the insurgency in Iraq and highlighted, "The groups that are most responsible for the abuse, namely [[al-Qaeda in Iraq]], Ansar al-Sunna and the Islamic Army in Iraq, have all targeted civilians for abductions and executions. The first two groups have repeatedly boasted about massive car bombs and suicide bombs in mosques, markets, bus stations and other civilian areas. Such acts are war crimes and in some cases may constitute crimes against humanity, which are defined as serious crimes committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population."<ref name="Human Rights Watch">{{cite web | url=http://www.hrw.org/english/docs/2005/10/03/iraq11804.htm |title=Iraq: Insurgent Groups Responsible for War Crimes | publisher=Human Rights News | date=[[2005-10-03]] | accessdate=2006-08-29}}</ref>


[[Abu Musab al-Zarqawi]] was killed on [[June 7]] [[2006]] in the town of Baquba, north of Baghdad, when U.S. warplanes dropped 2, 500-pound bombs on his isolated safe house.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1201981,00.html|title=How They Got Zarqawi: The Manhunt That Snared Him|publisher=Time|date=[[2006-06-08]]|author=Tony Karon}}</ref> President George W. Bush said the killing was "a severe blow to al-Qaida and it is a significant victory in the war on terror" but cautioned: "We have tough days ahead of us in Iraq that will require the continuing patience of the American people."<ref name="al-zarqawi-airstrike_x">{{cite news|url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-06-08-al-zarqawi-airstrike_x.htm|title=U.S. airstrike kills Iraq terror chief Zarqawi|publisher=USA Today|date=[[2006-06-22]]|author=Bill Nichols|co-author=Matt Kelley}}</ref> His death corresponded with no decrease in the level of violence.
[[Abu Musab al-Zarqawi]] was killed on [[June 7]] [[2006]] in the town of Baquba, north of Baghdad, when U.S. warplanes dropped two 500-pound bombs on his isolated safe house.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1201981,00.html|title=How They Got Zarqawi: The Manhunt That Snared Him|publisher=Time|date=[[2006-06-08]]|author=Tony Karon}}</ref> President George W. Bush said the killing was "a severe blow to al-Qaida and it is a significant victory in the war on terror" but cautioned: "We have tough days ahead of us in Iraq that will require the continuing patience of the American people."<ref name="al-zarqawi-airstrike_x">{{cite news|url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-06-08-al-zarqawi-airstrike_x.htm|title=U.S. airstrike kills Iraq terror chief Zarqawi|publisher=USA Today|date=[[2006-06-22]]|author=Bill Nichols|co-author=Matt Kelley}}</ref> His death corresponded with no decrease in the level of violence.


[[Al-Qaida in Iraq]] vowed to continue its "[[holy war]]," according to a statement posted on a Web site announcing: "We want to give you the joyous news of the martyrdom of the mujahed sheik Abu Musab al-Zarqawi."<ref name="al-zarqawi-airstrike_x"/> With over 1,600 Iraqi deaths in the month of June, the highest monthly total since the [[Al Askari Mosque]] bombing, the death of Zarqawi appears to have had little impact on the violence in Iraq.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://msnbc.msn.com/id/13715637/|title=Bodies flood morgue despite Zarqawi’s death|publisher=MSNBC|date=[[2006-07-05]]}}</ref>
[[Al-Qaeda in Iraq]] vowed to continue its "[[holy war]]," according to a statement posted on a Web site announcing: "We want to give you the joyous news of the martyrdom of the mujahed sheik Abu Musab al-Zarqawi."<ref name="al-zarqawi-airstrike_x"/> With over 1,600 Iraqi deaths in the month of June, the highest monthly total since the [[Al Askari Mosque]] bombing, the death of Zarqawi appears to have had little impact on the violence in Iraq.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://msnbc.msn.com/id/13715637/|title=Bodies flood morgue despite Zarqawi’s death|publisher=MSNBC|date=[[2006-07-05]]}}</ref>


:''see also: [[History of Iraqi insurgency]], [[Sectarian violence in Iraq]]'', ''[[Private militias in Iraq]]''
:''see also: [[History of Iraqi insurgency]], [[Sectarian violence in Iraq]]'', ''[[Private militias in Iraq]]''
Line 347: Line 348:


==Vigils to Honor 2000 soldiers killed in Iraq==
==Vigils to Honor 2000 soldiers killed in Iraq==
[[Image:Set355_06.jpg|thumb|right|350px|Vigils to Honor 2,000 Killed in Iraq by lighting 2000 + 1 candles]]
[[Image:Set355_06.jpg|thumb|right|350px|Vigils to Honor 2,000 U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq by lighting 2,001 candles]]
On Wednesday evening [[October 26]] [[2005]], 1,354 candlelight vigils were held in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to remember and honor the fallen U.S. soldiers of the Iraq War. Some honored the fallen soldiers by lighting one candle for each soldier killed, including one more candle for a soldier that was killed that day bringing the total to 2001.<ref> {{cite web | url=http://political.moveon.org/iraqvigils/ | title=Vigils to Honor 2,000 Killed in Iraq | publisher=Moveon.org |accessdate=2006-08-29}}</ref> It took close to an hour to read all the names of the fallen men and women of the United States killed in this war.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.ips-dc.org/iraq/statement2000.htm | title=IPS Statement on 2000 U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq | publisher=Institute for Policy Studies | author=Phyllis Bennis | coauthors=Erik Leaver and the IPS Iraq Task Force | date=[[2005-10-25]] | accessdate=2006-08-29}}</ref>
On Wednesday evening [[October 26]] [[2005]], 1,354 candlelight vigils were held in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to remember and honor the fallen U.S. soldiers of the Iraq War. Some honored the fallen soldiers by lighting one candle for each soldier killed, including one more candle for a soldier that was killed that day bringing the total to 2001.<ref> {{cite web | url=http://political.moveon.org/iraqvigils/ | title=Vigils to Honor 2,000 Killed in Iraq | publisher=Moveon.org |accessdate=2006-08-29}}</ref> It took close to an hour to read all the names of the fallen men and women of the United States killed in this war.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.ips-dc.org/iraq/statement2000.htm | title=IPS Statement on 2000 U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq | publisher=Institute for Policy Studies | author=Phyllis Bennis | coauthors=Erik Leaver and the IPS Iraq Task Force | date=[[2005-10-25]] | accessdate=2006-08-29}}</ref>


==Financial costs==
==Financial costs==
===Dollar figures===
===Dollar figures===
As of September 29, 2006, over $379 [[1000000000 (number)|billion]] has been allocated by the US Congress for the Iraqi war.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Defense-Spending.html?hp&ex=1159588800&en=73dffaa3995d31e7&ei=5094&partner=homepage |title=Senate, 100-0, Approves Budget for Pentagon | publisher=New York Times | date=[[2006-09-29]] | accessdate=2006-09-29}}</ref> The direct costs of the war and occupation have not been included in the regular defense spending request (with the exception of FY 2007); instead, President Bush has submitted emergency spending bills to Congress to cover those costs. <ref>{{cite web | url=http://zfacts.com/p/272.html | title=Congressional Reports: Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan since 9/11 | publisher=zFacts.org | date=[[2006-04-24]] | accessdate=2006-08-15}}</ref> The current rate of U.S. expenditure in Iraq is approx. $6.4 billion a month. <ref>{{cite web| url=http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB114178357697392103-TjKUdWN4qoenDbAFbOI8Ywp2O_M_20070308.html?mod=blogs |title=LU.S. Annual War Spending Grows | publisher=Wall Street Journal | date=[[2006-03-08]] | accessdate=2006-03-08}}</ref>
As of September 29, 2006, over $379 [[1000000000 (number)|billion]] has been allocated by the US Congress for the Iraqi war.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Defense-Spending.html?hp&ex=1159588800&en=73dffaa3995d31e7&ei=5094&partner=homepage |title=Senate, 100-0, Approves Budget for Pentagon | publisher=New York Times | date=[[2006-09-29]] | accessdate=2006-09-29}}</ref> The direct costs of the war and occupation have not been included in the regular defense spending request (with the exception of FY 2007); instead, President Bush has submitted emergency spending bills to Congress to cover those costs. <ref>{{cite web | url=http://zfacts.com/p/272.html | title=Congressional Reports: Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan since 9/11 | publisher=zFacts.org | date=[[2006-04-24]] | accessdate=2006-08-15}}</ref> The current rate of U.S. expenditure in Iraq is approximately $6.4 billion a month. <ref>{{cite web| url=http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB114178357697392103-TjKUdWN4qoenDbAFbOI8Ywp2O_M_20070308.html?mod=blogs |title=LU.S. Annual War Spending Grows | publisher=Wall Street Journal | date=[[2006-03-08]] | accessdate=2006-03-08}}</ref>


As of March 2006, approximately £4.5 billion has been spent by the United Kingdom in Iraq. All of this money has come from a government fund called the "Special Reserve" which has a current allocation of £6.44 billion.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.iraqanalysis.org/publications/235 | title=The Rising Costs of the Iraq War (March 2006) | publisher=IraqAnalysis.org | date=[[2006-03-22]] | accessdate=2006-08-15}}</ref>
As of March 2006, approximately £4.5 billion had been spent by the United Kingdom in Iraq. All of this money has come from a government fund called the "Special Reserve" which has a current allocation of £6.44 billion.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.iraqanalysis.org/publications/235 | title=The Rising Costs of the Iraq War (March 2006) | publisher=IraqAnalysis.org | date=[[2006-03-22]] | accessdate=2006-08-15}}</ref>


It is not known how much more money has been spent by other members of the coalition; however, the US's share of the cost is by far the largest.
It is not known how much more money has been spent by other members of the coalition; however, the US's share of the cost is by far the largest.
Line 362: Line 363:
===U.S. equipment losses===
===U.S. equipment losses===
In addition to the human casualties suffered in the war, the U.S. has also lost a number of pieces of military equipment. This total includes those vehicles lost in non-combat related accidents -
In addition to the human casualties suffered in the war, the U.S. has also lost a number of pieces of military equipment. This total includes those vehicles lost in non-combat related accidents -
numbers are an approximation. Recently, the Army has said that the cost of replacing its depleted equipment has tripled.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13563055/ |title=Army’s Iraq, Afghanistan equipment costs triple | publisher=MSNBC | date=[[2006-06-27]] | accessdate=2006-08-15}}</ref>
numbers are an approximation. Recently, the Army has said that the cost of replacing its equipment has tripled.<ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13563055/ |title=Army’s Iraq, Afghanistan equipment costs triple | publisher=MSNBC | date=[[2006-06-27]] | accessdate=2006-08-15}}</ref>


'''Combat losses: Land equipment'''<ref name="lexington 773">{{cite web | url=http://www.lexingtoninstitute.org/docs/773.pdf | title=Army Equipment After Iraq | publisher=Center for American Progress | author=Loren B. Thompson | coauthors=Lawrence J. Korb, Caroline P. Wadhams | accessdate=2006-08-15}}</ref>
'''Combat losses: Land equipment'''<ref name="lexington 773">{{cite web | url=http://www.lexingtoninstitute.org/docs/773.pdf | title=Army Equipment After Iraq | publisher=Center for American Progress | author=Loren B. Thompson | coauthors=Lawrence J. Korb, Caroline P. Wadhams | accessdate=2006-08-15}}</ref>

Revision as of 07:31, 5 October 2006

For other uses, see Iraq war (disambiguation).
Iraq War
Part of U.S. "War on Terrorism"[1]
File:Iraqwarimage.jpg
An Iraqi Army unit prepares to board a UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter for a counterinsurgency mission in Baghdad.
DateMarch 20, 2003 to Present
Location
Result

Conflict ongoing

Belligerents
Ba'athist Iraq
Ba'ath Loyalists
Al-Qaeda in Iraq
Mahdi Army
Other insurgent groups and militias
United States United States
United Kingdom United Kingdom
Australia Australia
Template:Country data flagcountry
Iraq New Iraqi Army
Kurdish forces
Multinational forces in Iraq
Commanders and leaders
Saddam HusseinFile:White flag icon.jpg
Abu Musab al-Zarqawi
Moqtada al-Sadr
Abu Ayyub al-Masri
Mujahideen Shura Council
Tommy Franks
Jay Garner
L. Paul Bremer
Ricardo S. Sanchez
George Casey
Strength
375,000+ initial (figure only includes regular Iraqi forces) 263,000 coalition, 50,000 Kurdish fighters (peak)
Casualties and losses
Iraqi military dead(Saddam-era): 4,900-6,375[4]

Insurgents dead or jailed : 67,000+[5]

Total combatants dead or jailed due to war: 72,000 - 100,000[5]:
Coalition dead[inc. 2,732 US, 119 UK, 117 other, 428+ contractors]: 3,396

Iraqi Security Forces dead(post-Saddam era): 6,167

Coalition Wounded in action [inc. 19,910 U.S., 800+ UK, 3,963+ contractors]: 24,673[6] [7]
Civilian dead due directly to war (includes only deaths officially reported[1]).: 43,546 to 48,343 [8]

Total deaths of civilian and non-civilians due to war [over the previous year before the war]:
98,000 (95% CI 8,000 - 194,000)[9]

The Iraq War (2003 to the present), also known alternatively as the Second or Third Gulf War (and by the U.S. military as Operation Iraqi Freedom), is a military engagement encompassing the invasion and occupation of Saddam Hussein's Ba'athist Iraq by a U.S.-led coalition, ongoing asymmetric warfare between an insurgency and coalition troops plus the New Iraqi Army (pictured at right), as well as escalating violence between the country's Shia and Sunni populations. In the midst of the fighting between the insurgency and the coalition troops, sectarian violence has erupted between the majority Shia and the minority Sunni. The causes and consequences of the war remain the subject of controversy.[10][11][12]

War rationale

According to critics, the rationale for the invasion presented by American and British leaders has changed several times.

Events following the 1991 Gulf War

After the 1991 Gulf War, then-United States Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney reported that "Saddam Hussein's offensive military capability, his capacity to threaten his neighbors, has been virtually eliminated." Yet there was still much concern over Iraq's weapons programs, so United Nations Resolutions were passed to impose sanctions on the regime of Saddam Hussein until it was verified that its weapons of mass destruction were destroyed. Starting in the aftermath of the war and continuing until 1998, UNSCOM inspected Iraq, locating and destroying large quantities of chemical agents, nuclear-related equipment and other prohibited materials.[13][14][15] Conflict between Iraq and the UN developed during 1998, however, which led to the withdrawal of the UN and the authorization of a bombing campaign by the Clinton administration to "degrade Saddam's capacity to develop and deliver weapons of mass destruction, and to degrade his ability to threaten his neighbors".[16][17][18]

Furthermore, in November 1998, at the urging of President Bill Clinton, the U.S. House of Representatives and the US Senate passed the "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998," [19] which "declare[d] that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime from power in Iraq and to replace it with a democratic government." President Clinton signed this bill into law. It also stated that "nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise speak to the use of United States Armed Forces," instead calling for support of Iraqi opposition groups. [20]

From April 1991 and the formation of UNSCOM, Iraq had been under ongoing pressure by the United Nations to declare and destroy its biological and chemical weapons. In total the UN had passed 13 resolutions calling for complete access of UNSCOM and IAEA officials to locate and destroy all weapons of mass destruction.[13]

Claire Short claims that in July 2002, UK government ministers were warned that Britain was committed to participating in a U.S. invasion of Iraq, and a further allegation was that “the decision by Blair’s government to participate in the U.S. invasion of Iraq bypassed proper government procedures and ignored opposition to the war from Britain’s intelligence quarters.“[21]fact}}. Tony Blair had agreed to back military action to oust Saddam Hussein with an assessment regarding WMD, at a summit at President George W. Bush's Texas ranch. Also present at the meeting, were Geoff Hoon, then-British defence secretary, Jack Straw, then-British foreign secretary, and Sir Richard Dearlove, then-chief of MI6.

Beginning in September, 2002, an Iraq disarmament crisis emerged due to assertions that "Saddam Hussein's regime is a grave and gathering danger" and that Iraq possessed and was developing large stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction in violation of UN sanctions.[22]

On October 16, 2002 an Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 was passed in the United States House of Congress. In November, 2002, UN Security Council Resolution 1441 was passed unanimously demanding that Iraq comply with its disarmament obligations as well as previous resolutions on human rights, terrorism and prisoners of war. Iraq agreed to the resolution and UNMOVIC began inspections on November 18, 2002, replacing UNSCOM which had previously been in charge of monitoring Iraq since April 3, 1991.[13][23] Four months later on March 7, 2003, chief inspector Hans Blix made his last presentation to the U.N. describing Iraq's cooperation in resolving outstanding issues as "active or even proactive," although "these initiatives three to four months into the new resolution cannot be said to constitute immediate cooperation."[24]

After failed attempts to get a United Nations Security Council resolution supporting military action against Iraq, the United States unilaterally delivered an ultimatum on March 17, 2003, demanding that Saddam Hussein leave Iraq within 48 hours.[25] On March 18, 2003 the U.S. announced the formation of the "Coalition of the willing".[26][24][27] On March 20, 2003 the 2003 Invasion of Iraq began, led by the United States and the United Kingdom, and the "Coalition of the Willing".[28]

War Rationale Post September 11, 2001

Reasons for the invasion and occupation are controversial, and have varied over time. The first calls for invasion of Iraq came from the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), and the American Enterprise Institute, with arguments based largely on the alleged threat that Saddam posed to American interests in the region, and the project of American influence into the next century. These reasons were not those given by the Bush administration of the United States and have never been recognized by the government.

Beginning with a speech to the United Nations General Assembly on September 12, 2002 President George W. Bush began a public campaign to convince the world that Saddam Hussein was violating both the commitments he had made at the end of the First Gulf War and which prior UN resolutions dealt with: weapons of mass destruction, human rights, Kuwaiti prisoners of war, terrorism, long range SCUD missiles, the U.N. Oil-for-Food Programme and allowing UN inspectors to return to Iraq after their removal in 1998.[29] Despite repeated claims by President Bush to the contrary, continuing even recently,[30][31][32][33] Iraq agreed to allow inspectors back into the country on September 17, 2002.[34][35] Inspections began after the passage of U.N. Resolution 1441 on November 18, 2002.[36]. Bush and his cabinet repeatedly linked the Hussein government to the September 11, 2001 attacks on the basis of an alleged meeting in Prague in April 2001 involving an Iraqi intelligence agent and other evidence.[37]. Both a Senate Select Committee and the 9/11 Commission failed to uncover convincing evidence of such a link.[38][39][40]

Colin Powell holding a model vial of anthrax while giving a presentation to the United Nations Security Council. He later referred to this speech as "painful," saying it was a "blot" on his record.[41]

On October 10, 2002 the 107th Congress of the United States passed HJ Res 114 titled "Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002." Among the reasons noted in the Congressional resolution authorizing force were Iraq's non-compliance with U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441,[42] aid to terrorists (PALF),[43][44] a 1993 assassination attempt on former President George H. W. Bush (George W. Bush's father)[45] and the Emir of Kuwait, in addition to violations of the no-fly zones.[46]

In his January 27, 2003 report to the U.N., chief inspector Hans Blix, while noting Iraqi cooperation with regards to prompt access to inspection sites, stated "...Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance, not even today, of the disarmament which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace." The reasons for this include a failure to account for quantities of VX nerve agent and anthrax and also the inability of the U.N. to interview Iraqi scientists outside the country.[47] As late as June 2003, Hans Blix stated that although his team had found no evidence of WMD, "I don't exclude that they can find things. ... I don't think I'd be surprised if they found it." [2] Later, however, Hans Blix was sceptical of the motivation for the invasion of Iraq. [48]

On February 5, 2003 Colin Powell attempted to convince the UN Security Council that Saddam Hussein's regime posed a significant and timely threat to international security.[49] The Bush administration also claimed that Iraq was allied with al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations, including the Palestinian Arab Liberation Front (PALF), Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Hezbollah.[50][51][52][53] Bush administration officials also claimed that Iraq was developing nuclear weapons.[54] Powell later expressed regret that the evidence for his claims, while they "reflected the collective judgment, the sound judgment of the intelligence community" the sourcing was "inaccurate and wrong and in some cases, deliberately misleading." [55] [56]

Criticisms of the rationale for the Iraq war

Despite these efforts to sway public opinion, the invasion of Iraq was seen by many as a violation of international law, breaking the UN Charter (see Legitimacy of the 2003 invasion of Iraq).[57] especially since the U.S. failed to secure U.N. support for an invasion of Iraq. In 41 countries the majority of the populace did not support an invasion of Iraq without U.N. sanction and half said an invasion should not occur under any circumstances.[58] In the U.S., 73 percent of Americans supported an invasion.[58] To build international support the United States formed a "Coalition of the Willing" with United Kingdom, Italy and several other countries despite a majority of citizens in these countries opposing the invasion.[58] Massive protests on the war have occurred in the U.S. and elsewhere.[59][60][61] At the time of the invasion UNMOVIC inspectors were ordered out by the United Nations. The inspectors requested more time because "disarmament, and at any rate verification, cannot be instant."[62][24]

Following the disputed invasion, no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction were found, although about 500 abandoned chemical munitions, mostly degraded, remaining from Iraq's Iran-Iraq war-era chemical weapons, were collected from around the country.[63][64][65] The Kelly Affair highlighted a possible attempt by the British government to cover-up fabrications in British intelligence, the exposure of which would have undermined the Prime Minister's original rationale for involvement in the war. The U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence found no substantial evidence for reputed links between Iraq and al-Qaeda.[66][67] President George W. Bush has since admitted that "much of the intelligence turned out to be wrong".[68][69][70]

Although evidence of WMD was searched for by the Iraq Survey Group, their final report of September 2004 stated, "While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad’s desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force against it should WMD be discovered."[71] In the March 2005 Addendum to the Report, the Special Advisor furthermore went on to state that "ISG assesses that Iraq and Coalition Forces will continue to discover small numbers of degraded chemical weapons, which the former Regime mislaid or improperly destroyed prior to 1991. ISG believes the bulk of these weapons were likely abandoned, forgotten and lost during the Iran-Iraq war because tens of thousands of CW munitions were forward deployed along frequently and rapidly shifting battlefronts."[72] (For comparison, the U.S. Department of Defense itself was famously unable in 1998 to report the whereabouts of "56 airplanes, 32 tanks and 36 Javelin command launch units".)[73]

According to opinion polls, the war was unpopular from the outset, and in nearly all Coalition countries it was widely viewed as counterproductive, improper, or even illegal; only since summer 2005 has this been the majority case in the United States.[58][74]

In Europe the peace movement was very strong.[75][76] Ten NATO member countries did not join the coalition with the U.S., and their leaders made public statements in opposition to the invasion of Iraq.[citation needed] Public perceptions of the U.S. changed dramatically as a consequence of the invasion.[77][78] Especially in Germany, where three quarters of the population were opposed to the war.[79]

Other possible U.S. objectives, denied by the U.S. government but acknowledged by retired U.S. General Jay Garner, included the establishment of permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq as a way of projecting power (creating a credible threat of U.S. military intervention) to the oil-rich Gulf region and the Middle East generally. Jay Garner, who was in charge of planning and administering post-war reconstruction in Iraq, explained that the U.S. occupation of Iraq was comparable to the Philippine model: "Look back on the Philippines around the turn of the 20th century: they were a coaling station for the navy, and that allowed us to keep a great presence in the Pacific. That's what Iraq is for the next few decades: our coaling station that gives us great presence in the Middle East";[80] (See also Philippine-American War). Garner was replaced by Paul Bremer after reports came out of his position in SY Coleman, a division of defense contractor L-3 Communications specializing in missile-defense systems. It was believed his role in the company was in contention with his role in Iraq.[81] The House Appropriations Committee said the report accompanying the emergency spending legislation was "of a magnitude normally associated with permanent bases."[82]

However, the U.S. House of Representatives voted in 2006 to not fund any permanent bases in Iraq.[83]

Ironically, at the 61st meeting of the United Nations General Assembly Bush stated that "Freedom, by its nature, cannot be imposed — it must be chosen."[84]

2003

Prior to invasion

No-fly zone detail

Prior to invasion, the United States and other coalition forces involved in the 1991 Persian Gulf War had been engaged in a low-level conflict with Iraq, by enforcing the two Iraqi no-fly zones in the north and the south of the country. Iraqi air-defense installations repeatedly targeted American and British air patrols and were often engaged by the coalition aircraft shortly afterwards. In mid-2002, the U.S. initiated Operation Southern Focus as a change to its response strategy, by increasing the overall number of missions and selecting targets throughout the no-fly zones in order to disrupt the military command structure in Iraq.

The weight of bombs dropped increased from none in March 2002 and 0.3 in April 2002 to between 8 and 14 tons per month in May-August, reaching a pre-war peak of 54.6 tons in September - prior to Congress' 11 October authorization of the invasion. In retaliation for the Iraqi's now-daily air defense attacks on coalition aircraft, the September attacks included a 5 September 100-aircraft attack on the main air defence site in western Iraq. According to an editorial by Michael Smith for the The New Statesman, this was "Located at the furthest extreme of the southern no-fly zone, far away from the areas that needed to be patrolled to prevent attacks on the Shias; it was destroyed not because it was a threat to the patrols, but to allow allied special forces operating from Jordan to enter Iraq undetected."[85] US military personnel stationed at Southern Watch headquarters during this time, recall that this attack, on this particular Iraqi air defense unit, was taken solely in reaction to Iraq's continued attack on coalition aircraft operating in compliance with the UN-mandated overflights of the Iraq "no-fly" zone.

Invasion

The 2003 invasion of Iraq, the second Gulf war was termed "Operation Iraqi Freedom" by the US administration, and began on March 19. They cooperated with Kurdish forces in the north which numbered upwards of 50,000.[citation needed] Other nations also participated in part of a coalition force to help with the operation by providing equipment, services and security as well special forces. The 2003 Iraq invasion marked the beginning of what is commonly referred to as the Iraq War.

Troop Deployment

Template:Operation Iraqi Freedom Troop Deployment

Post-invasion, early and mid 2003

Map of the Sunni Triangle

On May 1, 2003, President Bush made a dramatic visit to the aircraft carrier U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln while the ship was a few miles west of San Diego. The Lincoln was on its way home to Everett, Washington from a long deployment which had included service in the Persian Gulf. The visit climaxed at sunset with his now-legendary "Mission Accomplished" speech. This nationally-televised speech was delivered before the sailors and airmen on the flight deck. Bush essentially declared victory at this time (even though, admittedly, Saddam Hussein was still at large and significant pockets of resistance remained plus more resistance would form for years to come.)

In May of 2003, after the defeat of Iraq's conventional forces, the coalition military noticed a gradually increasing flurry of attacks on the multinational troops in various regions, such as the "Sunni Triangle". In the initial chaos after the fall of the Iraqi government, there was massive looting of infrastructure, including government buildings, official residences, museums, banks, and military depots. According to The Pentagon, 250,000 tons (of 650,000 tons total) of ordnance was looted, providing a significant source of ammunition for the Iraqi insurgency. The hundreds of weapons caches already created by the conventional Iraqi army and Republican Guard further strengthened these looted supplies for the insurgents.

At first the resistance stemmed from fedayeen and loyalists of Saddam Hussein or the Ba'ath Party,[citation needed] but soon religious radicals and Iraqis angered by the occupation contributed to the insurgency. In late 2004, foreign fighters from around the Middle East as well as Al-Qaeda in Iraq (a group that is separate from al-Qaeda but which changed its name for propaganda purposes), led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi would help to drive the insurgency. The insurgents are generally known to the Coalition forces as "Anti-Iraqi Forces."

The initial insurgency in Iraq was concentrated in, but not limited to, an area referred to by Western media and the occupying forces as the Sunni triangle. This location includes Baghdad.[86] The three provinces that had the highest number of attacks were Baghdad, Anbar, and Salah Ad Din--these provinces account for 35% of the population. This resistance has been described as a type of guerrilla warfare. Insurgent tactics include mortars, suicide bombers, improvised explosive devices, roadside bombs, small arms fire, and RPGs, as well as sabotage against the oil, water, and electrical infrastructure.

American soldier and an Iraqi child

The post-invasion environment began after the Hussein regime had been overthrown. It centers on Coalition and U.N. efforts to establish a stable democratic state capable of defending itself[87] and holding itself together[88] and overcoming insurgent attacks and internal divisions.

Coalition military forces launched several operations around Tigris River peninsula and in the Sunni Triangle. A series of similar operations were launched throughout the summer in the Sunni Triangle. Toward the end of 2003, the intensity and pace of insurgent attacks began to increase. A sharp surge in guerrilla attacks ushered in an insurgent effort that was termed the "Ramadan Offensive", as it coincided with the beginning of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. Coalition forces brought to bear the use of air power for the first time since the end of the invasion.

Suspected ambush sites and mortar launching positions struck from the air and with artillery fire. Surveillance of major routes, patrols, and raids on suspected insurgents were stepped up. In addition, two villages, including Saddam’s birthplace of al-Auja and the small town of Abu Hishma were wrapped in barbed wire and carefully monitored. On July 22, 2003, during a raid by the U.S. 101st Airborne Division and soldiers from Task Force 20, Saddam Hussein's sons (Uday and Qusay) and one of his grandsons were killed.

In the wave of intelligence information fueling the raids on remaining Ba'ath Party members connected to insurgency, Saddam Hussein himself was captured on December 13 2003 on a farm near Tikrit. The operation was conducted by the U.S. Army's 4th Infantry Division and members of Task Force 121.

Late 2003

File:Baghdadbox.png
US Army in Baghdad.

With the capture of Saddam and a drop in the number of insurgent attacks (an average of 18 a day), some concluded the multinational forces were prevailing in the fight against the insurgency. With the weather growing cooler, Coalition forces were able to operate in full armor which reduced their casualty rate. The provisional government began training a security force intended to defend critical infrastructure, and the United States promised over $20 billion in reconstruction money in the form of credit against Iraq's future oil revenues. Of this, less than half a billion dollars had been spent in 10 months after it had been promised. Oil revenues were also used for rebuilding schools and for work on the electrical and refining infrastructure.

However, the failure to restore basic services to above pre-war levels, where over a decade of sanctions, bombing, corruption, and decaying infrastructure had left major cities functioning at much-reduced levels, also contributed to local anger at the IPA government headed by an executive council. On July 2 2003, President Bush declared that American troops would remain in Iraq in spite of the attacks, challenging the insurgents with "My answer is, bring 'em on," a line the President later expressed misgivings about having used. [89] In the summer of 2003, the multinational forces focused on hunting down the remaining leaders of the former regime, culminating in the shooting deaths of Saddam's two sons in July. In all, over 300 top leaders of the former regime were killed or captured, as well as numerous lesser functionaries and military personnel.

Shortly after the capture of Saddam, elements left out of the Coalition Provisional Authority began to agitate for elections and the formation of an Iraqi Interim Government. Most prominent among these was the Shia cleric Ali al-Sistani. More insurgents stepped up their activities. The two most turbulent centers were the area around Fallujah and the poor Shia sections of cities from Baghdad to Basra in the south.

2004

Early-mid 2004 – increased insurgent activity and Fallujah

The start of 2004 was marked by a relative lull in violence. Insurgent forces reorganized during this time, studying the multinational forces' tactics and planning a renewed offensive. Guerrilla attacks were less intense.

Insurgent activity soon increased, however, as hundreds of Iraqi civilians and police were killed over the next few months in a series of massive bombings. One hypothesis for these increased bombings is that the relevance of Saddam Hussein and his followers was diminishing in direct proportion to the influence of radical Islamists, both foreign and Iraqi. An organized Sunni insurgency, with deep roots and both nationalist and Islamist motivations, was becoming more powerful throughout Iraq. The Mahdi Army also began launching attacks on coalition targets in an attempt to seize control from Iraqi security forces. The southern and central portions of Iraq were beginning to erupt in urban guerrilla combat as multinational forces attempted to keep control and prepared for a counteroffensive.

The coalition and the Coalition Provisional Authority decided to face the growing insurgency with a pair of assaults: one on Fallujah, the center of the "Mohammed's Army of Al-Ansar", and another on Najaf, home of an important mosque that had become the focal point for the Mahdi Army and its activities. Just before the attack on Fallujah, four private military contractors, working for Blackwater USA, were ambushed and their corpses mutilated by a large crowd, receiving a great deal of media attention. The attention elicited a violent reaction from Donald Rumsfeld who then ordered Lt. General Conway to attack Fallujah at the earliest opportunity.

After this incident, the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force began plans to re-establish a coalition presence in Fallujah. On April 4, the multinational forces began assaults to clear Fallujah of insurgents. On April 9, the multinational force allowed more than 70,000 women, children and elderly residents to leave the besieged city, reportedly also allowing males of military age to leave. Meanwhile, insurgents were taking advantage of the lull in combat to prepare defenses for a second assault. On April 10, the military declared a unilateral truce to allow for humanitarian supplies to enter Fallujah. Troops pulled back to the outskirts of the city; local leaders reciprocated the ceasefire, although lower-level intense fighting on both sides continued.

The usage by the U.S. of white phosphorus in Fallujah attracted controversy. In the documentary "Fallujah: The Hidden Massacre", aired on the Italian state television network RAI, a former soldier testified "I saw the burned bodies of women and children. The phosphorus explodes and forms a plume. Who ever is within a 150 metre radius has no hope."[90][91][92] The US State department first dismissed such claims,[93] but was later corrected in other reports. Lt Col Barry Venable stated to the BBC, "it is an incendiary weapon and may be used against enemy combatants." According to Protocol III of the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, white phosphorus can be used, but only against enemy combatants and not civilians.[94] The Independent later reported that "there remain widespread reports of civilians suffering extensive burn injuries. While US commanders insist they always strive to avoid civilian casualties, the story of the battle of Fallujah highlights the intrinsic difficulty of such an endeavour."[95]

When the Iraqi Governing Council protested against the US assault to retake Fallujah, the US military halted its efforts. In the April battle for Fallujah, Coalition troops killed about 600 insurgents and a number of civilians, while 40 Americans died and hundreds were wounded in a fierce battle. The Marines were ordered to stand-down and cordon off the city, maintaining a perimeter around Fallujah. A compromise was reached in order to ensure security within Fallujah itself by creating the local "Fallujah Brigade". While the Marines attacking had a clear advantage in ground firepower and air support, LtGen Conway decided to accept a truce and a deal which put a former Baathist general in complete charge of the town's security. The Fallujah Brigade's responsibility was to secure Fallujah and put a stop to insurgent mortar attacks on the nearby U.S. Marine bases. This compromise soon fell apart and insurgent attacks returned, causing Marine commanders to begin preparations for a second attack in the coming fall. By the end of the spring uprising, the cities of Fallujah, Samarra, Baquba, and Ramadi had been left under guerrilla control with coalition patrols in the cities at a minimum.[citation needed]

Early-mid 2004 – the Shi'ite south

Meanwhile, the fighting continued in the Shiite south, and Italian and Polish forces were having increasing difficulties retaining control over Nasiriya and Najaf. United States Marines were then shifted there to put down the overt rebellion and proceeded to rout Muqtada al-Sadr's Shiite militia. In all, April, May and early June saw more fighting. Over the next three months, the multinational forces took back the southern cities. Also, various insurgent leaders entered into negotiations with the provisional government to lay down arms and enter the political process.

The new Iraqi government

Main article: Iraqi coalition counter-insurgency operations

Toward the end of June 2004, the Coalition Provisional Authority transferred the "sovereignty" of Iraq to a caretaker government, whose first act was to begin the trial of Saddam Hussein. However, fighting continued in the form of the Iraqi insurgency. The new government began the process of moving towards open elections, though the insurgency and the lack of cohesion within the government itself, has led to delays. Militia leader Muqtada al-Sadr took control of Najaf and, after negotiations broke down, the government asked the United States for help dislodging him. Through the months of July and August, a series of skirmishes in and around Najaf culminated with the Imam Ali Mosque itself under siege, only to have a peace deal brokered by Grand Ayatollah Sistani in late August. The new Iraq Grain Board has started to import wheat from Australia Wheat Board which had been long banned by Saddam Hussein.[96]

2005

Iraqi elections and aftermath

On January 31, an election for a government to draft a permanent constitution took place. Although some violence and lack of widespread Sunni Arab participation marred the event, most of the eligible Kurd and Shia populace participated. On February 4, Paul Wolfowitz announced that 15,000 U.S. troops whose tours of duty had been extended in order to provide election security would be pulled out of Iraq by the next month. [97]February, March and April proved to be relatively peaceful months compared to the carnage of November and January, with insurgent attacks averaging 30 a day from the prior average of 70.

Hopes for a quick end to an insurgency and a withdrawal of U.S. troops were dashed at the advent of May, Iraq's bloodiest month since the invasion by U.S. forces in March and April of 2003. Suicide bombers, believed to be mainly disheartened Iraqi Sunni Arabs, Syrians and Saudis, tore through Iraq. Their targets were often Shia gatherings or civilian concentrations mainly of Shias. As a result, over 700 Iraqi civilians died in that month, as well as 79 U.S. soldiers.

During early and mid-May, the U.S. also launched Operation Matador, an assault by around 1,000 Marines in the ungoverned region of western Iraq. Its goal was the closing of suspected insurgent supply routes of volunteers and material from Syria, and with the fight they received their assumption proved correct. Fighters armed with flak jackets (unseen in the insurgency before this time) and using sophisticated tactics met the Marines, eventually inflicting 30 U.S. casualties by the operation's end, and suffering 125 casualties themselves. The Marines succeeded, recapturing the whole region and even fighting insurgents all the way to the Syrian border, where they were forced to stop (Syrian residents living near the border heard the American bombs very clearly during the operation). The vast majority of these armed and trained insurgents quickly dispersed before the U.S. could bring the full force of its firepower on them, as it did in Fallujah.

Announcements and renewed fighting

On August 14, 2005 the Washington Post[98] quoted one anonymous U.S. senior official expressing that "the United States no longer expects to see a model new democracy, a self-supporting oil industry or a society in which the majority of people are free from serious security or economic challenges... 'What we expected to achieve was never realistic given the timetable or what unfolded on the ground'". On September 22, 2005, Prince Saud al-Faisal, the Saudi foreign minister, said that he had warned the Bush administration in recent days that Iraq was hurtling toward disintegration, and that the election planned for December was unlikely to make any difference. [99] U. S. officials immediately made statements rejecting this view [100].

2006

The beginning of 2006 was marked by government creation talks, growing sectarian violence, and continuous anti-coalition attacks.

Al-Askari shrine bombing and Sunni-Shia fighting

See Al Askari Mosque bombing

On February 22 2006, at 6:55 a.m. local time (0355 UTC) two bombs were set off by five to seven men dressed as personnel of the Iraqi Special forces who entered the Al Askari Mosque during the morning. Explosions occurred at the mosque, effectively destroying its golden dome and severely damaging the mosque. Several men, one wearing a military uniform, had earlier entered the mosque, tied up the guards there and set explosives, resulting in the blast.

Attacks against Iraqi National and Coalition forces as of July 2006 (Data from Government Accountability Office report product no. GAO-06-1094t)
Attacks against Iraqi National and Coalition forces as of July 2006 (Data from Government Accountability Office report product no. GAO-06-1094t)

Shiites across Iraq expressed their anger by destroying Sunni mosques and killing dozens. Religious leaders of both sides called for calm amid fears this could erupt into a long-feared Sunni-Shia civil war in Iraq.

On March 2 the director of the Baghdad morgue fled Iraq explaining, "7,000 people have been killed by death squads in recent months." [3] The Boston Globe reported that around eight times the number of Iraqis killed by terrorist bombings during March 2006 were killed by sectarian death squads during the same period. A total of 1,313 were killed by sectarian militias while 173 were killed by suicide bombings.[4] The LA Times later reported that about 3,800 Iraqis were killed by sectarian violence in Baghdad alone during the first three months of 2006.[5] During April 2006, morgue numbers showed that 1,091 Baghdad residents were killed by sectarian executions.[6] Insurgencies, frequent terrorist attacks and sectarian violence led to harsh criticism of US Iraq policy and fears of a failing state and civil war. The concerns were expressed by several US think tanks [7] [8] [9] [10] as well as the US ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad. [11]

In early 2006, a handful of high-ranking retired generals began to demand United States Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's resignation due in part to the aforementioned chaos that resulted from his management of the war.

In September 2006, The Washington Post reported that the commander of the Marine forces in Iraq filed "an unusual secret report" concluding that the prospects for securing the Anbar province are dim, and that there is almost nothing the U.S. military can do to improve the political and social situation there.[101]

Iraq was listed fourth on the 2006 Failed States Index compiled by the American Foreign Policy magazine and the Fund for Peace think-tank. The list was topped by Sudan. [102] [103]

Iraqi insurgency

When the ruling Ba'ath party organization disintegrated after the fall of the Iraqi government, elements of the secret police and Republican Guard formed guerrilla units, since some had simply gone home rather than openly fight the multinational forces. Many of these smaller units formed the center of the initial anti-coalition insurgency, based primarily around the cities of Mosul, Tikrit and Fallujah.

The militants and guerrilla units favored attacking unarmored vehicles and avoiding major battles. The early Iraqi insurgency was concentrated in, but not limited to, an area referred to by the Western media and the occupying forces as the Sunni triangle which includes Baghdad.[104]

By the fall of 2003, these insurgent groups began using typical guerrilla tactics such as ambushes, bombings, kidnappings, and improvised explosive devices. Other tactics included mortars, suicide bombers, roadside bombs, small arms fire, and RPGs, as well as sabotage against the oil, water, and electrical infrastructure. The insurgents primarily targeted civilians and secondarily checkpoints and coalition forces. The civilian death log reveals that a large majority of the deaths were by car bombs, booby traps, throat slitting, beheading and other techniques that are known to be associated with insurgents.[citation needed] These irregular forces favored attacking unarmored or lightly armored Humvee vehicles, the U.S. military's primary transport vehicle. In November 2003, some of these forces successfully attacked U.S. rotary aircraft with SAM-7 missiles bought on the global black market. Insurgent groups such as the al-Abud Network have even attempted to constitute their own chemical weapons programs, attempting to weaponize traditional mortar rounds with ricin and mustard toxin.[105]

Civilian deaths attributable to insurgent or military action in Iraq between January 1, 2003 and July 20, 2006 (Data from IraqBodyCount.org)

There is evidence that some guerrilla groups are organized, perhaps by the fedayeen and other Saddam Hussein or Ba'ath loyalists, religious radicals, Iraqis angered by the occupation, and foreign fighters.[106] On February 23, 2005 Al-Iraqiya TV (Iraq) aired transcripts of confessions by Syrian intelligence officer Anas Ahmad Al-Issa and Iraqi insurgent Shihab Al-Sab'awi concerning their booby-trap operations, explosions, kidnappings, assassinations, and details of beheading training in Syria. [107] The insurgents are known by the Coalition military (especially in the United States armed forces) as Anti-Iraqi Forces (AIF).[108][109]

A 2005 Human Rights Watch report analysed the insurgency in Iraq and highlighted, "The groups that are most responsible for the abuse, namely al-Qaeda in Iraq, Ansar al-Sunna and the Islamic Army in Iraq, have all targeted civilians for abductions and executions. The first two groups have repeatedly boasted about massive car bombs and suicide bombs in mosques, markets, bus stations and other civilian areas. Such acts are war crimes and in some cases may constitute crimes against humanity, which are defined as serious crimes committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population."[110]

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was killed on June 7 2006 in the town of Baquba, north of Baghdad, when U.S. warplanes dropped two 500-pound bombs on his isolated safe house.[111] President George W. Bush said the killing was "a severe blow to al-Qaida and it is a significant victory in the war on terror" but cautioned: "We have tough days ahead of us in Iraq that will require the continuing patience of the American people."[112] His death corresponded with no decrease in the level of violence.

Al-Qaeda in Iraq vowed to continue its "holy war," according to a statement posted on a Web site announcing: "We want to give you the joyous news of the martyrdom of the mujahed sheik Abu Musab al-Zarqawi."[112] With over 1,600 Iraqi deaths in the month of June, the highest monthly total since the Al Askari Mosque bombing, the death of Zarqawi appears to have had little impact on the violence in Iraq.[113]

see also: History of Iraqi insurgency, Sectarian violence in Iraq, Private militias in Iraq

Human rights abuses

Spc. Charles Graner poses over Manadel al-Jamadi's corpse.

Throughout the entire Iraq war there have been numerous human rights abuses on all sides of the conflict.

U.S. Armed Forces

WARNING: These links have graphic content depicting a decapitation; some of the most publicized abuses include:

Insurgent forces

The regular Iraqi insurgents and other groups such as the Sunni Islamic militant groups Al-Qaeda in Iraq and Ansar al-Islam are responsible for numerous abuses and killings, including:

  • Killing over 12,000 Iraqis over the period of January 2005 - June 2006, according to Iraqi Interior Minister Bayan Jabr, giving the first official count for the largest category of victims of bombings, ambushes and other increasingly deadly attacks. [115] The insurgents have also conducted numerous suicide attacks on the Iraqi civilian population, mostly targeting the majority Shia community, such as the Attack on the Shia district of Sadr City, Baghdad, on 02/07/2006 which claimed at least 66 lives.[116][117] An October 2005 report from Human Rights Watch examines the range of civilian attacks and their purported justification.[110]
  • The bombing of the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad in August 2003 which killed the top U.N. representative in Iraq and 21 other UN staff members. [118]
  • The February 2006 bombing of the al-Askari Mosque, destroying one of the holiest Shiite shrines, killing over 165 worshippers and igniting sectarian strife and reprisal killings. [119]
  • Beheading several diplomats: two Algerian diplomatic envoys Ali Belaroussi and Azzedine Belkadi,[120] Egyptian diplomatic envoy al-Sherif, [121] and four Russian diplomats. [122]
  • The publicized murders of several non-military persons including; construction contractor Eugene Armstrong, supply contractor Jack Hensley, translator Kim Sun-il, supply contractor Kenneth Bigley, Bulgarian truck drivers Ivaylo Kepov and Georgi Lazov[123], Shosei Koda, Italian Fabrizio Quattrocchi, charity worker Margaret Hassan, reconstruction engineer Nick Berg, Italian photographer, 52 year old Salvatore Santoro[124] and Iraqi supply worker Seif Adnan Kanaan. Most of these civilians were subjected to brutal torture and/or beheading.
  • Torture or murder of members of the New Iraqi Army,[125] and assassination of civilians associated with the Coalition Provisional Authority, such as Fern Holland, or the Iraqi Governing Council, such as Aqila al-Hashimi and Ezzedine Salim, or other foreign civilians, such as those from Kenya.[126]

Iraqi government

Other abuses have been blamed on the new Iraqi government, including:

  • The widespread use of torture by Iraqi security forces.[127]
  • Shiite-run death squads run out of the Interior Ministry that are accused of committing numerous massacres of Sunni Arabs[128] and the police collusion with militias in Iraq have compounded the problems.

Vigils to Honor 2000 soldiers killed in Iraq

Vigils to Honor 2,000 U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq by lighting 2,001 candles

On Wednesday evening October 26 2005, 1,354 candlelight vigils were held in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to remember and honor the fallen U.S. soldiers of the Iraq War. Some honored the fallen soldiers by lighting one candle for each soldier killed, including one more candle for a soldier that was killed that day bringing the total to 2001.[129] It took close to an hour to read all the names of the fallen men and women of the United States killed in this war.[130]

Financial costs

Dollar figures

As of September 29, 2006, over $379 billion has been allocated by the US Congress for the Iraqi war.[131] The direct costs of the war and occupation have not been included in the regular defense spending request (with the exception of FY 2007); instead, President Bush has submitted emergency spending bills to Congress to cover those costs. [132] The current rate of U.S. expenditure in Iraq is approximately $6.4 billion a month. [133]

As of March 2006, approximately £4.5 billion had been spent by the United Kingdom in Iraq. All of this money has come from a government fund called the "Special Reserve" which has a current allocation of £6.44 billion.[134]

It is not known how much more money has been spent by other members of the coalition; however, the US's share of the cost is by far the largest.

Joseph Stiglitz, former chief economist of the World Bank has suggested the total costs of the Iraq War on the US economy will be $1 trillion in a conservative scenario and could top $2 trillion in a moderate one.[135] Additionally, the extended combat and equipment loss have placed a severe financial strain on the U.S Army, causing the elimination of non-essential expenses such as travel and civilian hiring.[136] [137] The CIA World Factbook lists a 2005 estimate of U.S. military expenditure as 4.06% of GDP (the 26th position in a listing of 167 countries). The Congressional Research Service recently estimated weekly spending at almost $2 billion per week, and that total expenditures have now topped $1 trillion.[138] The Office of Management and Budget's pie chart shows that the discretionary defense spending is 20% of government outlays[139]

U.S. equipment losses

In addition to the human casualties suffered in the war, the U.S. has also lost a number of pieces of military equipment. This total includes those vehicles lost in non-combat related accidents - numbers are an approximation. Recently, the Army has said that the cost of replacing its equipment has tripled.[140]

Combat losses: Land equipment[141]

Combat losses: Air equipment[141]

References

  1. ^ "President Discusses Global War on Terror at Kansas State University". Whitehouse. 2006-01-23. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. ^ "Sectarian divisions change Baghdad's image". MSNBC. 2006-07-03. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. ^ MSNBC - Widespread damage to Iraqi infrastructure
  4. ^ FACTBOX: Military and civilian deaths in Iraq Reuters 2 October 2006
  5. ^ a b "Iraq Index" (PDF). The Brookings Institution. 2006-08-07. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  6. ^ "Toll of British wounded in Iraq war reaches 800". Times Online. 2006-01-18. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  7. ^ "Civilian contractors in Iraq dying at faster rate as insurgency grows". McClatchy Washington Bureau. 2005-11-01. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. ^ "Iraq Body Count: War dead figures". BBC. 2006-09-24. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  9. ^ "Lancet Mortality Study" (PDF). Lancet. 2004-09-29. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  10. ^ "Subject Directory:Iraq War". The Nation.
  11. ^ "The Iraq War: Three Years". Global Security. 2006-03-12. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  12. ^ "Cameron backs Blair on Iraq war". BBC. 2006-06-26. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  13. ^ a b c Chronology of main events. United Nations. December 1999.
  14. ^ "Inspecting Iraq - High Noon in Baghdad". CNN. 1998.
  15. ^ "What UNSCOM Achieved: Analysis". PBS Frontline. Unavailable. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  16. ^ "Transcript: President Clinton explains Iraq strike". CNN. 1998-12-16. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  17. ^ "Iraq attacked in 'Operation Desert Fox'". CNN. 1998-12-16. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  18. ^ "Desert Fox". BBC.
  19. ^ "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998". The Library of Congress. Retrieved 2006-08-29]. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  20. ^ "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998". IraqWatch.Org.
  21. ^ "Claire Short".
  22. ^ "President's Remarks at the United Nations General Assembly". Whitehouse. 2002-09-12. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  23. ^ "UNMOVIC:Basic facts". United Nations: UNMOVIC.
  24. ^ a b c "Transcript of Blix's U.N. presentation". CNN. 2003-03-07. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  25. ^ "President Says Saddam Hussein Must Leave Iraq Within 48 Hours". Whitehouse. 2003-03-17. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  26. ^ "US names 'coalition of the willing'". BBC. 2003-03-18. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  27. ^ "Bush: Iraq is playing 'wilful charade'". CNN. 2003-03-07. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  28. ^ "U.S. launches cruise missiles at Saddam". CNN. 2003-03-20. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  29. ^ "President Bush's address to the United Nations". CNN. 2002-09-12. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  30. ^ "President Reaffirms Strong Position on Liberia". Whitehouse. 2003-07-14. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  31. ^ "Bush Uranium Lie Is Tip of the Iceberg". FAIR.Org. 2003-07-18. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  32. ^ "Bush Trims a Tale". Consortium News.Com. 2004-09-23. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  33. ^ "OpEd:Saddam chose to deny inspectors". Salon.Com. 2006-03-31. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  34. ^ "UN inspectors begin Iraq mission". BBC. 2002-11-18. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  35. ^ "Iraq agrees to weapons inspections". CNN. 2002-09-17. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  36. ^ "Timeline: Iraq weapons inspections". BBC. 2002-11-18. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  37. ^ Mylroie, Laurie, "The Saddam-9/11 Link Confirmed", FrontPageMagazine.com, May 11, 2004
  38. ^ United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiaccuracy.pdf. Retrieved 10 September 2006.
  39. ^ United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiinc.pdf. Retrieved 10 September, 2006.
  40. ^ Section 10.3, The 9/11 Commission Report (2004). http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch10.htm. Retrieved 10 September 2006.
  41. ^ [http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Politics/story?id=1105979&page=1 "Colin Powell on Iraq, Race, and Hurricane Relief", ABC News
  42. ^ "Text of U.N. resolution on Iraq". CNN. 2002-11-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  43. ^ "Saddam Pays 35K for Palestinian Bombers". Fox News. 2002-03-26. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  44. ^ "Saddam dispenses blood money to win Palestinian hearts". The Age. 2002-03-26. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  45. ^ "U.S. Strikes Iraq for Plot to Kill Bush". Washington Post. 1993-06-27. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  46. ^ "U.S.: Coalition aircraft strike Iraqi artillery site". CNN. 2003-01-26. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  47. ^ "Transcript of Blix's remarks". CNN. 2003-01-27. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  48. ^ "Profile: Hans Blix". BBC. 2004-02-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  49. ^ "Remarks to the United Nations Security Council". United States Department of State. 2003-02-05. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  50. ^ "Palestinians get Saddam funds". BBC. 2003-03-13. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  51. ^ "White House spells out case against Iraq". CNN. 2002-09-12. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  52. ^ "Bush stands by al Qaeda, Saddam link". CNN. 2004-06-15. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  53. ^ "Al Qaeda-Hussein Link Is Dismissed". Washington Post. 2004-06-17. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  54. ^ "Top Bush officials push case against Saddam". CNN. 2002-09-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  55. ^ Powell, Colin. Quoted in transcript for Meet the Press, May 16, 2004. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4992558/ Retrieved 17 Sep 2006.
  56. ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/08/AR2006090800777.html
  57. ^ "Iraq war illegal, says Annan". BBC. 2004-09-16. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  58. ^ a b c d Iraq Survey 2003. Gallup International.
  59. ^ "Cities jammed in worldwide protest of war in Iraq". CNN. 2003-02-16. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  60. ^ "'Million' march against Iraq war". BBC. 2003-02-16. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  61. ^ Largest Anti-War Rally. Guinness Book of World Records.
  62. ^ "Blix wants months - and Straw offers 10 days". The Guardian. 2003-03-07. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  63. ^ "New report offers no evidence that Iraq stockpiled WMD". Mercury News. 2006-06-22. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  64. ^ "Sarin, Mustard Gas Discovered Separately in Iraq". Fox News. 2004-05-17. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  65. ^ "Hundreds of chemical weapons found in Iraq". Breitbart. 2006-06-22. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  66. ^ United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiaccuracy.pdf. Retrieved Sep. 10, 2006.
  67. ^ United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiinc.pdf. Retrieved Sep. 10, 2006.
  68. ^ "Bush takes responsibility for invasion intelligence". CNN. 2005-12-14. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  69. ^ "Transcript of Bush speech". CNN. 2005-12-14. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  70. ^ "Bush admits Iraq intelligence was wrong". The Guardian. 2005-12-14. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  71. ^ "Iraq Survey Group Final Report". GlobalSecurity.Org.
  72. ^ "Addendums to the Comprehensive Report" (PDF). GlobalSecurity.Org.
  73. ^ "Government's financial systems fall flat". Government Computer News. 2000-06-24. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  74. ^ Post War Iraq Poll. Gallup International. 2003-05-13
  75. ^ "Millions march against war". Boston.Com. 2003-02-16. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  76. ^ "No reason to rest". Al-Ahram Weekly. 2004-04-08 to 2004-04-14. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  77. ^ "America's Image Further Erodes, Europeans Want Weaker Ties". The Pew Research Center. 2003-03-18. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  78. ^ "A Year After Iraq War: Mistrust of America in Europe Ever Higher, Muslim Anger Persists". The Pew Research Center. 2004-03-16. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  79. ^ "Analysis: Germany finds a voice". BBC. 2003-02-03. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  80. ^ "Bush Lies Uncovered". AlterNet. 2004-02-23. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  81. ^ "General reverses his role". The San Francisco Chronicle. 2003-02-26. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  82. ^ "Iraq bases spur questions over US plans". BBC. 2006-03-30. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  83. ^ "The Will of the People's House Is Clear: No Permanent Bases in Iraq". U.S. House of Representatives: Tom Allen Homepage.
  84. ^ whitehouse.gov
  85. ^ "The war before the war". News Statesman. 2005-05-30. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  86. ^ "Operation Iraqi Freedom Maps". GlobalSecurity.Org. Unavailable. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  87. ^ "Poll: Iraqis out of patience". USA Today. 2004-04-30. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  88. ^ "Gloom descends on Iraqi leaders as civil war looms".
  89. ^ "President Regrets 'Bring 'Em On'". NewsMax.com Wires. 2005-01-14. Retrieved 2006-09-01. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  90. ^ "Did the US military use chemical weapons in Iraq?". The Christian Science Monitor. 2005-11-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  91. ^ "Fallujah: The Hidden Massacre" on the U.S. Use of Napalm-Like White Phosphorus Bombs". DemocracyNow.Org. 2005-11-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  92. ^ "fallujah_ING" (WMV). Rainews24.rai.it.
  93. ^ "Did the U.S. Use "Illegal" Weapons in Fallujah?". U.S. Department of State. 2004-11-12. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  94. ^ "US used white phosphorus in Iraq". BBC. 2005-11-16. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  95. ^ "The Fog of War: White Phosphorus, Fallujah and Some Burning Questions". CommonDreams.Org. 2005-11-15. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  96. ^ "Australian wheat export to Iraq resumes". The Sydney Morning Herald. 2006-07-06. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  97. ^ "U.S. to pull out 15,000 from Iraq; The U.S. is to withdraw about 15,000 troops from Iraq from next month, the deputy defence secretary has announced". BBC News, 4 February 2005.
  98. ^ Wright, Robin, and Ellen Knickmeyer, "U.S. Lowers Sights On What Can Be Achieved in Iraq; Administration Is Shedding 'Unreality' That Dominated Invasion, Official Says". Washington Post, August 14 2005.
  99. ^ MacAskill, Ewen, Country is hurtling towards disintegration, Saudis warn". Guardian, September 24 2005.
  100. ^ Pleming, Sue, "U.S. rejects Saudi view Iraq near disintegration". Reuters, 23 September 2005.
  101. ^ "Situation Called Dire in West Iraq", The Washington Post
  102. ^ "Sudan tops 'failed states index'",BBC News
  103. ^ "FfP: Failed States Index", The Fund for Peace
  104. ^ "Operation Iraqi Freedom Maps". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 2006-09-01.
  105. ^ "Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD" (PDF). Central Intelligence Agency.
  106. ^ "Iraqi attacks could signal wide revolt". The Seattle Times. 2003-06-30. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  107. ^ "Syrian Intelligence Officer and Top Iraqi Terrorist Reveal Beheading Training in Syria (Short Version)". Al-Iraqiya TV (Iraq). 2005-02-23. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  108. ^ "Anti-Iraqi Forces site:.mil". Google Search.
  109. ^ ""anti-iraqi forces" site:mod.uk". Google Search.
  110. ^ a b "Iraq: Insurgent Groups Responsible for War Crimes". Human Rights News. 2005-10-03. Retrieved 2006-08-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  111. ^ Tony Karon (2006-06-08). "How They Got Zarqawi: The Manhunt That Snared Him". Time. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  112. ^ a b Bill Nichols (2006-06-22). "U.S. airstrike kills Iraq terror chief Zarqawi". USA Today. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |co-author= ignored (help)
  113. ^ "Bodies flood morgue despite Zarqawi's death". MSNBC. 2006-07-05. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  114. ^ Neil Mackay (2004-03-14). "Iraq: The Wedding Party Massacre". Sunday Herald. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  115. ^ Ellen Knickmeyer (2005-06-03). "Iraq Puts Civilian Toll at 12,000". The Washington Post. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  116. ^ Paul McGeough (2005-02-02). "Handicapped boy who was made into a bomb". The Sydney Morning Herald. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  117. ^ "Iraq bombing toll rises". The Age. 2006-07-02. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  118. ^ "Who are the Iraq Insurgents?". NewsHour with Jim Lehrer. 2006-06-12. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  119. ^ Alex Rodriguez. Iraqi shrine blast suspect caught. The Chicago Tribune. June 29, 2006.
  120. ^ "Kidnappers Kill Algerian Diplomats". Free Internet Press. 2005-07-27. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  121. ^ "Captors kill Egypt envoy to Iraq". BBC News. 2005-07-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  122. ^ "Russian diplomat deaths confirmed". BBC News. 2006-06-26. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  123. ^ "Insurgents kill Bulgarian hostage: Al-Jazeera". CBC News. 2004-07-14. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  124. ^ "Foreign hostages in Iraq". CBC News. 2006-06-22. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  125. ^ Sabrina Tavernise (2005-06-19). "Iraqis Found in Torture House Tell of Brutality of Insurgents". The New York Times. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  126. ^ "Iraq kidnappings stun Kenya press". BBC News. 2004-07-23. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  127. ^ "Iraq: Torture Continues at Hands of New Government". Human Rights News. 2005-01-25. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  128. ^ Dexter Filkins (2005-11-29). "Sunnis Accuse Iraqi Military of Kidnappings and Slayings". The New York Times. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  129. ^ "Vigils to Honor 2,000 Killed in Iraq". Moveon.org. Retrieved 2006-08-29.
  130. ^ Phyllis Bennis (2005-10-25). "IPS Statement on 2000 U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq". Institute for Policy Studies. Retrieved 2006-08-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  131. ^ "Senate, 100-0, Approves Budget for Pentagon". New York Times. 2006-09-29. Retrieved 2006-09-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  132. ^ "Congressional Reports: Cost of Iraq, Afghanistan since 9/11". zFacts.org. 2006-04-24. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  133. ^ "LU.S. Annual War Spending Grows". Wall Street Journal. 2006-03-08. Retrieved 2006-03-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  134. ^ "The Rising Costs of the Iraq War (March 2006)". IraqAnalysis.org. 2006-03-22. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  135. ^ Linda Bilmes (2006). "THE ECONOMIC COSTS OF THE IRAQ WAR: AN APPRAISAL THREE YEARS AFTER THE BEGINNING OF THE CONFLICT" (PDF). National Bureau of Research. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |Month= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  136. ^ "Strapped for money, Army extends cutbacks on spending". USA Today. 2006-07-20. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  137. ^ Michael Hirsh (2006-07-21). "End of Days?". Newsweek. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  138. ^ "Cost of Iraq war nearly $2b a week". Boston Globe. 2006-09-28. Retrieved 2006-09-28. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  139. ^ 2006 Mid-session reviewpage 8
  140. ^ "Army's Iraq, Afghanistan equipment costs triple". MSNBC. 2006-06-27. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  141. ^ a b Loren B. Thompson. "Army Equipment After Iraq" (PDF). Center for American Progress. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  142. ^ Maj Karl C. Rohr (2006-03-21). "The Fog of War". Marine Corps Gazette. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  143. ^ Roxana Tiron (January 2006). "Marine Vehicle Upgrades Reflect Combat Demands". National Defense Magazine. Retrieved 2006-08-15.
  144. ^ Harold Kennedy (April 2006). "Marines Struggle to Begin Rebuilding Force in '07". National Defense Magazine. Retrieved 2006-08-15.
  145. ^ Pauline Jelinek (2005-08-03). "Marines in Iraq Killed in Amphibious Truck". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  146. ^ "Two Airmen Missing After F-15 Fighter Lost Over Iraq". FOXNews. 2003-04-08. Retrieved 2006-08-15. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

See also

External articles

Media Echo
  • Tatham, Steve (2006), 'Losing Arab Hearts & Minds: The Coalition, Al-Jazeera & Muslim Public Opinion' Hurst & Co (London) Published 1 Jan 06