Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
1 IP & 2 users left. rm 68.190.153.14 (blocked for a fortnight by 5 albert square (AO ACB)).
Line 33: Line 33:
:::::::: This isn't a content dispute. This is one person adding unsourced information and ignoring warnings about it, and multiple people reverting him. Plain as day. [[Special:Contributions/101.182.29.49|101.182.29.49]] ([[User talk:101.182.29.49|talk]]) 07:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
:::::::: This isn't a content dispute. This is one person adding unsourced information and ignoring warnings about it, and multiple people reverting him. Plain as day. [[Special:Contributions/101.182.29.49|101.182.29.49]] ([[User talk:101.182.29.49|talk]]) 07:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
:::::::::{{AIV|nv}} Plus you haven't correctly warned them anyway [[User:5 albert square|5 albert square]] ([[User talk:5 albert square|talk]]) 08:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
:::::::::{{AIV|nv}} Plus you haven't correctly warned them anyway [[User:5 albert square|5 albert square]] ([[User talk:5 albert square|talk]]) 08:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
:::::::::: The edits are hoaxes. That's vandalism and he's just done it again. Point taken though about the proper warning and I'll do that now. [[Special:Contributions/101.182.29.49|101.182.29.49]] ([[User talk:101.182.29.49|talk]]) 09:37, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
* {{IPVandal|71.56.226.182}} This user was automatically reported by huggle, please verify their contributions carefully, it may be a false positive [[User:Darylgolden|<b style="color:#FA0">Darylgolden</b>]]<sup>([[User talk:Darylgolden|<b style="color:#F00">talk</b>]])</sup> <span style="font-size: 70%;">Ping when replying</span> 05:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
* {{IPVandal|71.56.226.182}} This user was automatically reported by huggle, please verify their contributions carefully, it may be a false positive [[User:Darylgolden|<b style="color:#FA0">Darylgolden</b>]]<sup>([[User talk:Darylgolden|<b style="color:#F00">talk</b>]])</sup> <span style="font-size: 70%;">Ping when replying</span> 05:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
* {{Vandal|X96lee15}} This user is repeatedly removing the death summary information from the [[John Saunders (journalist)]] page. Please help this user to understand that a brief summary of information about the death of a person who has a Wiki page is included in the heading, with more detailed information below. Thank you. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.13.138.185|68.13.138.185]] ([[User talk:68.13.138.185#top|talk]]) 05:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* {{Vandal|X96lee15}} This user is repeatedly removing the death summary information from the [[John Saunders (journalist)]] page. Please help this user to understand that a brief summary of information about the death of a person who has a Wiki page is included in the heading, with more detailed information below. Thank you. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.13.138.185|68.13.138.185]] ([[User talk:68.13.138.185#top|talk]]) 05:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 09:37, 1 January 2017

    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 21:36 on 7 October 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    Reports

    User-reported

    Some possible background on this: another user's comments on IP Shenme (talk) 02:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Have responded to that note there. Report stands. 101.182.29.49 (talk) 06:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Additional - user persisted again here 101.182.29.49 (talk) 06:10, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Take this report to WP:ANI, that is the correct noticeboard for these sorts of things, not WP:AIV. I will say that it had looked like this dispute was coming to a close here when an agreement was supposedly made, but it looks like they're still some unresolved issues here... 2601:1C0:104:14A3:89B3:5260:77CA:20A0 (talk) 06:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Persistently adding unsourced information (eg Hoaxes) after being warned is vandalism. This report stays here. 101.182.29.49 (talk) 06:31, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Alright, that's fine; but you're much more likely to come to a resolution there then you are here. More admins are watching WP:ANI (I presume) and it's much easier to have a discussion about these problems there then it is here. More complicated issues that are not necessarily "obvious vandalism" are dealt with at WP:ANI (and no, this is not "obvious vandalism", this is a content dispute between you and some other editors). That is why this report is being ignored by admins, while other users reported here have already been blocked. Also, if this report sits here for much longer, then it will be removed by an admin as unactionable. I'm just trying to help move this whole ordeal along, since nothing appears to be happening here and WP:ANI appears/seems to be the only viable solution. 2601:1C0:10E:7B49:38AC:736E:76E1:6082 (talk) 06:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    This isn't a content dispute. This is one person adding unsourced information and ignoring warnings about it, and multiple people reverting him. Plain as day. 101.182.29.49 (talk) 07:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Plus you haven't correctly warned them anyway 5 albert square (talk) 08:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    The edits are hoaxes. That's vandalism and he's just done it again. Point taken though about the proper warning and I'll do that now. 101.182.29.49 (talk) 09:37, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. GFOLEY FOUR!05:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree I think this report was a preemptive strike. It seems like this is about to become a WP:BOOMERANG situation. 68.13.138.185 has been adding unsourced info regularly, despite being warned by other editors. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 07:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]