Jump to content

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Reporting Maria-Yulia. (TW)
Line 23: Line 23:
:{{UAA|nb}}. The user seems to be editing constructively. &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 23:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
:{{UAA|nb}}. The user seems to be editing constructively. &ndash;[[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] [[User talk:Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''T'''ropical</sup></font>]] [[Special:contributions/Juliancolton|<font color="#66666"><sup>'''C'''yclone</sup></font>]] 23:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=Thebeaners}} Seems to be a well-known racial slur. The single edit the user has made isn't making it easy to assume good faith. <sup><small>[[User:Law|<font color="black">'''Law'''</font>]]</small></sup><sub><small> [[User talk:Law|<font color="black">shoot!</font>]]</small></sub> 00:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=Thebeaners}} Seems to be a well-known racial slur. The single edit the user has made isn't making it easy to assume good faith. <sup><small>[[User:Law|<font color="black">'''Law'''</font>]]</small></sup><sub><small> [[User talk:Law|<font color="black">shoot!</font>]]</small></sub> 00:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
:I'll admit that the edit appears to be the epitome of vandalism, however, this is not a username issue in my opinion. [[User:Wisdom89|'''<font color="#660000">Wisdom89</font>''']] <sub>([[User_talk:Wisdom89|<small><sub><font color="#17001E">T</font></sub></small>]] / [[Special:Contributions/Wisdom89|<small><sup><font color="#17001E">C</font></sup></small>]])</sub> 00:54, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:54, 6 November 2008

    Usernames for administrator attention

    This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.

    1. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
    2. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
    3. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
    4. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
    5. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
    6. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
    7. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
    This page was last updated at 11:31 on 20 August 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.


    User-reported

    I'm only worried if he starts promoting toga parties. TNX-Man 22:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait until the user edits. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:39, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait until the user edits. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:04, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Discussing with user.— Ѕandahl 22:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    nb. The user seems to be editing constructively. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I'll admit that the edit appears to be the epitome of vandalism, however, this is not a username issue in my opinion. Wisdom89 (T / C) 00:54, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]