Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 16:23 on 4 August 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Alerts

Bot-reported

• Ahamedhjewadh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:49, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
• 2001:2042:301e:fd00:3581:decd:6636:7f6e (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 3 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user blanking articles, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
• 176.89.126.84 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 766 (Alt-right labeling, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
• 2.26.221.231 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:53, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
• 82.28.134.55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• Faustian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) User Faustian is in serious violation of several edit rules on the Blue Army (Poland) page such as "Edit Warring", "POV", "Stating seriously contested assertions as facts" and most of all "Harassment" by restricting other users who disagree with him, and then posting the disputed material anyways. He was warned by other editors such as Volunteer Marek in the "Discussion" page that his edits are seriously flawed, and when myself tried to revert them he simply restricted my access. I ask urgently to have this person restricted and have the page reverted back to an earlier edit until the disputed material can be looked over. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xiiiiix (talk • contribs) 00:53, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:08, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

• 203.97.51.16 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - vandalism on Butter chicken after final warning, vandalism only account, has deleted last warning. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:41, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

• Note: User is in the category: IP addresses used for vandalism. HBC AIV helperbot7 (talk) 01:41, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

• 178.73.223.99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) IP hoping vandal who doesn't seem to give up. See history of National dish and look for IP 178... who received several warnings and is quite aware of that what they do is intentional vandalism. Rangeblock or longterm semi protection of article seems to be the only solution. TMCk (talk) 01:43, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

• Faustian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)Please note that the edits included in the most recent version by Faustian were deemed as POV by other users see. Note form the discussion page...

Quote for the Discussion page: but, Faustian, both these sources are problematic, at least for the purposes that you seem to indent to use them for. The first one specifically says that it is referring to perceptions. It even says "What is important here is not facts themselves but the way in which they have been seen and remembered". This does not at all support the inclusion of the text you propose. The way you seem to want to put it into the article is actually quite misleading and bordering on straight up POV pushing done via out-of-context citation. Yes, you have "Jews remember it..." in there but you are still misrepresenting the gist, and purpose of that quote. Likewise the second source is a PRIMARY source and in fact it only mentions Haller's army in passing. You can't use this. Volunteer Marek 04:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

...and when I tried to revert them Faustian had my IP address restricted. How do you not consider this vandalism and harassment? He had me restricted last night, then when I used my different IP he had that restricted also. Please advise? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xiiiiix (talk • contribs) 01:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Please read WP:NOTVAND. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 01:23, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

• Well in this case please un-restrict my access since I was blocked for simply trying to revert claims that have been deemed as POV by myself and other users... My IP 76.118.227.161 address. I think that arbitrary blocking of access by blocking my IP and then putting a lock on the page is a form of wiki terrorism and harrasment!