User talk:Cirt

AFD/T • T-7 • T-8 • T-2 • Relisted • AFDO • WP:DELSORT: Sexuality and gender, Pornography, Law, Internet • AFD tool links • WP:DRV • WP:MFD • AIV • RFUB • UAA/CAT • RFPP • PER • CSD • AB • FAR • FAC urgents • TFAR • RSN • BLPN • FTN • GAN Topic lists • Article alerts: Sexology and sexuality • LGBT studies • Feminism • Pornography Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report Significa liberdade 72 0 0 100 Open 22:18, 21 September 2024 6 days no report

Other neat portal ideas for longer term

• Longer term ideas to think about from other portals:

1. Events section, like: "On this day" e.g., Biography, United States; "Selected anniversaries" e.g., War; "Calendar" at Holidays. Interesting idea of "Month selected anniversaries", at Oregon.
2. Model intro with some rotating images, after Portal:Oregon, Portal:Indiana, Portal:Iceland/Intro and Portal:Philosophy of science/Intro.
3. Revamp DYK sections w/ free-use images, model after Portal:Criminal justice and Portal:Oregon.
4. Portal palettes at User:RichardF/Palettes/Portals. Comparable color schemes can be developed from the various hue lists at User:RichardF/Palettes. Also see Portal:Box-header.
5. If there are a lot of categories, then categories section to 2 columns, like in Portal:Indiana.

   Also take some time to check out style/formatting at Portal:Indiana Cirt (talk)

6. Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Main Page Featured Portal drive
7. Portal:Freedom of speech

Note to self - tools and templates

• MakeRef
• Reflinks
• Citation tool for Google Books
• Citation tool for DOIs
• Tools, part 1: References, external links, categories and size
• User:Edward/Find link

independent reliable secondary sources

• User:Citation bot/use

• {{findsources}}

Refs inside scroll box

<div class="reflist4" style="height: 200px; overflow: auto; padding: 3px; border: 1px solid #ababab">{{reflist|2}}</div>

Cite templates

<ref>{{cite book| last =  | first =  | authorlink =  | coauthors =  | title =  | publisher =  | year =  | location =  | page =  | url =  | doi =  | id =    | isbn = }}</ref>

<ref>{{cite news| last =  | first =  | coauthors =  | title =  | work =  | language =  | publisher =  | page =  | date =  | url =  | accessdate =  }}</ref>

<ref>{{cite journal|last =| first=| authorlink=| coauthors=|title=|journal=|volume=|issue=|page=|publisher=|location = | date = | url = | doi = | id = | accessdate = }}</ref>

<ref>{{cite web| last =  | first =  | authorlink =  | coauthors =  | title =  | work =  | publisher =  | date =  | url =  | format =  | doi =  | accessdate =  }}</ref>

Citation model

The Simpsons (season 3)

Body text in-cite

<ref name="REFNAME">[[#LASTNAME|LASTNAME]], p. PAGENUMBER</ref>

References section

(reference template from WP:CIT)

*<cite id=LASTNAME>REFERENCE</cite>

Different model

• Template:Citation
• Template:Harvnb
• Example: <ref name="REFNAME">{{Harvnb|LAST|YEAR|p=PAGENUMBER}}</ref>

See models at The General in His Labyrinth and Mario Vargas Llosa.

More info. Cirt (talk)

More at Wikipedia:Harvard citation template examples.

And Template talk:Harvard citation no brackets.

Cirt (talk)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Fæ

A request for comments has been opened on administrator User:Fæ. You are being notified due to your prior participation in ANI, RfA, or RfC discussions regarding this user. Thank you, MadmanBot (talk) 20:11, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. — Cirt (talk) 09:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

What

...is this. Tireless worker, get to closing those noms =S ResMar 01:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, been out of town lately, will take a look soon. — Cirt (talk) 08:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

...and do take a look at this, too. ResMar 21:43, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Okay will do. — Cirt (talk) 04:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Note to self, don't archive. — Cirt (talk) 04:32, 11 February 3012 (UTC)

Non-Neutral Point of View

Today, I was speaking with a man who is a practitioner of sungazing. He told me to look up information about it on the internet, and specifically to look for Hira Ratan Manek. I tried to use Wikipedia to find more information about this. I first looked at the sungazing page, but it had no information about any of what the man had told me. I then used Google to find Hira Ratan Manek's web site, as well as a recently-deleted Wikipedia page about him. I returned to Wikipedia and searched for his name and found a section on Inedia, which itself did not link back to sungazing, which is really what he's talking about. So I decided to make a few edits. I linked sungazing to inedia, and I put in a cross-reference to Hira Ratan Manek. This is good practice because it allows the easier access of similar information by Wikipedia users. I shouldn't have had to leave the site to find the information I needed when it was already here.

It is my contention that your deletion of the redirect does not constitute NPOV, but rather an example of the victors writing the history books. Sungazing has been practiced for millenia around the world and is still practiced in many cultures, just not those that spend a lot of time on Wikipedia. On the other hand, lots of Wikipedians have easy access to Western medical research, which is of course incredibly biased by the fact that western medicine is quite distinct from many of the modern cultures that practice sungazing. There is in fact a lot of information available about sungazing; it even used to be on the page. But it was deleted by the aforementioned victors, because it didn't stack up to western medicine. What the victors forgot was that this is an apples to oranges comparison: western medicine and sungazing are discussed in different traditions. The proponents of sungazing do not use statistics and controls, nor do they publish in journals, but they do write and publish material in their own manner. But they do not all experience vision loss, which seems to be guaranteed according to western science. We must be very careful of our bias.

--Guypersonson (talk) 08:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Feel free to make an editorial decision about that, or speak to a current admin. — Cirt (talk) 16:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Joe job

It has recently come to my attention that I was joe jobbed on Wikinews, and that you facilitated this joe job without question by accepting the initial query and running a checkuser at the request of the complainant. You also alleged in your response that the use of multiple accounts was indistinguishable from myself and should be blocked on sight. I'm afraid that your response as an administrator and checkuser in this regard is entirely unacceptable. Since I am prevented from responding there, I'm hoping that my response here will be satisfactory. Now, either one of the following three things are correct: 1) a user was trying to pretend to be me by creating and editing in a similar style, or 2) a user was trying to pretend to be me in order to justify a check user and by guilt by association, make it seem like I had violated the block, or 3) it was me. Based on the fact that I live in Hawaii and only edit (excepting island hotspots) from two IP ranges (home and cell), number 3 is unlikely, since I don't have access to a mobile phone or IP in Europe. Number 1 is also unlikely, but not impossible, as someone might think they are "helping" by disrupting Wikinews. Which leaves 2, which appears to me as very likely, as this kind of editing behavior would directly lead to a checkuser and associating my account with malfeasance, of which there has been none to date. Unfortunately, I am inclined to think that your conclusion was biased, based on our past interaction at Talk:Mau Piailug/GA1 and my support for the removal of your administrative tools on Wikipedia and/or your topic ban on controversial topics. Interestingly, or should I say, coincidentally, several of the administrators directly involved in this dispute, actively edit from European ISPs. It would be easy for them to associate my account with malfeasance and request a checkuser simply by creating a new account and editing in a similar style. This is a classic joe job, and one that seems, on the face of it, to have links to Wikinews itself. Viriditas (talk) 02:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry but as you appear to not be able to use your talk page on Wikinews, the venue for you to communicate is not here, but rather through the Wikinews OTRS queue. — Cirt (talk) 04:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

You want me to ask Wikinews to investigate itself? I don't think so, as you're probably responsible for answering the queue. Fox, henhouse, etc. No, this requires the assistance of a neutral ombudsman, as it appears that the integrity of the Wikinews community has been compromised. Intentionally associating users with joe job accounts is unconscionable. Viriditas (talk) 04:40, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Please note: From the very start of the check I'd noted I conferred with other Checkusers on this issue, and noted so, on wiki, diff. — Cirt (talk) 04:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

You associated me with a joe job account that neither belongs to me nor reflects my contributions in any manner, and quite clearly, edits from Europe and uses British English. I'm an American, and I edit from Hawaii. If this isn't making sense to you, then feel free to ask questions, but arguing from authority or saying you were only following orders isn't an acceptable use of the tools and displays a lack of good judgement on your part. Viriditas (talk) 05:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

You appear to be confusing associations I made with the named accounts with each other at n:Wikinews:Requests_for_CheckUser#Nauseous_green, with yourself. Actually, if you look closer, I made zero statements of the sort. — Cirt (talk) 05:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I haven't confused anything. You performed the CU based on a poorly constructed joe job attempt that was created to justify the CU in the first place. You know for a fact that the CU exonerated me, but you refused to confirm or deny, leaving the suspicion open. Further, the CU should not have been run in the first place, as this was quite clearly an amateurish fishing expedition for personal data that you allowed to occur. Viriditas (talk) 06:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

If you think there was a privacy violation, you can refer the matter to the m:Ombudsman commission at cu-ombuds-llists.wikimedia.org. If you think there was a m:Checkuser policy violation, you can seek out help from the Wikinews Arbitration Committee. — Cirt (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Cirt, you ran a checkuser on my account based on an obvoius joe job that had zero relation to me, and cannot be connected to me in any way, shape or form. However, you and others over at Wikinews refuse to acknowledge this and continue to claim it is me. I can easily prove it is not and I'm not even a checkuser:

1. "193.62.43.202" is a vandalism-only account, having engaged in vandalism and homophobic edits.[1] I've never done either of those things, ever. 193.62.43.202 also used the js button to repeatedly submit unauthorized reviews and to submit unauthorized publication of news articles.[2] I've never submitted any Wikinews article for review more than once, nor have I ever used the js button.
2. "Free Web Defence" engaged in the exact same behavior as 193.62.43.202. This is behavior that I've never once demonstrated on any wiki at anytime. Please also note the use of British English. I'm an American, and I spell "defense" with an s not a c.
3. "Fkjsdnkjfndsjfsd" does not appear to bear any relationship to "193.62.43.202", nor to "Free Web Defence", nor to myself, nor can I understand why it is even under discussion.
4. "77.28.104.213" appears to be "Fkjsdnkjfndsjfsd". No relation to myself in any way.

So, Cirt, on what evidence did you run this checkuser? And since you found no connection at all between myself and these other accounts, why are you and others still maintaining that they are me? It really sounds like you are abusing the tools and smearing innocent users like myself. I don't think anyone with admin rights or CU tools should be allowed to do that, and this has nothing to do with me. I would be saying the same thing about anyone that was being smeared like this. Please escalate this to the highest level, as I want it resolved immediately. I'm not asking that you lose your admin rights on Wikinews as you did here, I'm asking that you take the necessary steps to resolve this in a fair and just manner. If you can't do the right thing, say so, and I'll try and contact the Foundation. Viriditas (talk) 09:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment: Cirt is a most professional CheckUser, and you obviously "lack clue" regarding the privilege and it's use. You are speculating, Viriditas, that he actually checked your account. Given you well-warranted permanent ban from Wikinews, the logical checks to carry out would be the accounts raised, and the ranges they edited from [Because, we'd lack recent history on your assigned IPs]. Since these turned up open/hacked proxies, it would be pointless to check your account — unless there were grounds to suspect you had made use of proxies in the past.

You proved the point already on Wikinews: You don't know how to write a news article; you can't comprehend a wiki holding a "snapshot" of what was known at the time; and, you're prone to throwing the toys out your pram if people do not bend to your will.

You should take a degree of satisfaction from your failed efforts on Wikinews provoking a joe-job (if indeed it was such).

You need to admit that the RfCU was legitimate, that the use of CheckUser was legitimate, and that the "no clear evidence" response is acceptable. If not, then you're setting yourself up for the self-same treatment here, on Wikipedia — should you end up in a dispute and someone employs similar smear-tactics. In short: You owe Cirt an apology. I'd go further and say you owe the entire Wikinews community one over your dismissal of our arbcom's ability to function impartially, but I know that is not likely to be forthcoming. --Brian McNeil /^talk 19:57, 14 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian McNeil (talk • contribs)

On the contrary, there is incontrovertible evidence posted directly above your reply that shows there is no way these other accounts could be linked to me, either on a technical or on a behaviorial basis. This is obvious to anyone with a "clue". You've become so blinded by your personal disputes with other editors that you've become unable to execute your duties with a calm, rational demeanor. You appear to be more interested in propagating false allegations and inventing fantasies than in looking at the hard evidence. I don't really see how you can continue to function as an admin on Wikinews, but then again, Wikinews is entirely dysfunctional and operates as a walled garden at this point. It appears to be suffering from the same endemic problems as Meta. I would love to help fix the problem, Brian, but you're going to first need to accept that I'm here to help. Viriditas (talk) 21:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Dear Cirt: Could you please review the decision on the page for 'Getamungstit'

Dear Cirt

There used to be a page for the student magazine Getamungstit. The magazine went defunct, but is now archived in the National Library of Australia and I would be grateful if you could restore the page so I can add the story of how the magazine ended and how people can now access it through the archives of the National Library of Australia.

I hope I have done this the right way.

Yours sincerely

Kathryn Young

---

(that's the closest I cam come to four wiggly lines)

youngk@bigpond.net.au

http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/4668395 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.165.4.220 (talk) 11:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I'd suggest you create an account. Then, you can work on a proposed draft version, in a subpage of your user page. — Cirt (talk) 11:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Explanation?

I'm in WTF mode on this one: [3]. Care to illuminate me? Carrite (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Everyone can use a Welcome. It can't hurt for users to be aware of the major policies. Sometimes when I warn vandals, I even welcome them, then give them a warning. That way, they are aware of the specific policies, and the individual one they violated, and may choose to stop, and contribute in a constructive manner at a later point in time, and have the "Welcome" links to important policy pages, to refer back to. :) — Cirt (talk) 19:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I am unconvinced. This looks like a very poor decision, at a minimum, and evidence of collaboration, at a maximum. But done's done and I've probably said too much already. Carrite (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: For example, even Template:Uw-vandalism1 tells the user to read the welcome page. ;) — Cirt (talk) 19:41, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

If I may comment, this doesn't look nefarious at all. Cirt probably saw the user lacked a welcome message and he decided to add one. However, this vandal hasn't been active for two years, so I can also understand how Carrite finds it odd and questions its purpose. One thing that concerns me is the user name. Viriditas (talk) 06:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Reckless Love

Hello Cirt. I'm contacting you about Reckless Love because you closed an AfD on it and deleted it on 18 May 2010. The present article on the same topic was (re?-)created on 1 November 2010. On 8 December 2011, the article was tagged for suspected copyvio, but it appears that the tagger may not have added it to the copyvio investigations page, and the tag is just sitting there.

I am quite bemused as to what has happened and what should happen now, not knowing whether the article should be re-deleted, put up for copyvio investigation, or what else. Please could you take the matter up or, if you prefer, tell me what I can most usefully do? Best regards, --Stfg (talk) 19:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I'll defer to your judgment about what you think is best, or that of an admin. — Cirt (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I've launched the copyvio investigation at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 February 15, describing the key points of the history and suggesting it might benefit from admin attention. --Stfg (talk) 14:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Fascinating case

• United States v. The Progressive

Now this is a most fascinating legal case! — Cirt (talk) 03:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

• • I'm willing to give you a hand with improving it. I'm not a lawyer though. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
    • I very much look forward to see this! Two very talented wikipedians who writes about a very interesting topic. It can only result in a really great article! Valerie Duval (talk) 09:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
      • Thank you, yes, I'll try to get to it soon. ;) — Cirt (talk) 13:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Gotta flesh this out a bit more with secondary sources. — Cirt (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Good reference for use on article, United States v. The Progressive

• United States v. The Progressive
  • Kennedy, Caroline (1991). In Our Defense: The Bill of Rights in Action. Avon Books. pp. 37–55. ISBN 0-380-71720-4. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

Good reference for this article. — Cirt (talk) 18:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Note to self - Main Page Featured portal drive

• Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Main Page Featured Portal drive

Convenient link again. ;) — Cirt (talk) 04:57, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Category:Freedom of speech - Crosswiki Sister Link project coordination

• Commons:Category:Freedom of speech

• I've added a Sister Links template to Commons:Category:Freedom of speech, as a way of coordinating Crosswiki sister Wikimedia projects together along the topic. If anyone knows of any other Sister Wiki site links in other languages, and/or other websites, that aren't yet included, please feel free to suggest them at Commons:Category talk:Freedom of speech.

• I'd be most appreciated to anyone interested in this topic who'd like to help out!

Thanks for your time, — Cirt (talk) 09:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Nominate A Tale of a Tub for GA status

Whatever happened to the proposal to nominate A Tale of a Tub for GA status? I don't know anything about GA nominations, and it is clear from this talk page that you do, so please tell me about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dthomsen8 (talk • contribs)

Feel free to do so yourself, it'd be an interesting process. — Cirt (talk) 17:24, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Yellow Bird

You may be familiar w/Swedish company Yellow Bird, which controls the rights to Steig Larsson's books, producing the Swedish films and negotiating w/Sony on the English productions, notably "The Girl With The Dragon Tatoo" of late. YB has an article which will likely get a lot of traffic about now, and seems to be about 3 years out-of-date. Maybe you could make mention on the right talk page: I can't edit them unless there is already a topic/thread begun, as here. Rags69.171.178.23 (talk) 18:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry I haven't done research in that area yet. — Cirt (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Andrew Biersack

Hi, there's a request at Talk:Andrew Biersack for this article to be recreated and you were the deleting admin. Tra (Talk) 16:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

I'll defer to judgment of an admin about that, or perhaps you can post to talk pages of related wikiprojects. — Cirt (talk) 16:30, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 09:39, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

ILGLaw

Hi, you voted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender & Intersex Law Association. We looked for sources and I posted a review of each of the sources which were found. The sources do not seem to be enough to pass GNG. Would you care to comment or to change your vote? Dingo1729 (talk) 06:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

New article on film director Oliver Blackburn

• Oliver Blackburn

I've created this new article. If you've got additional input for secondary sources, please feel free to suggest them at the article's talk page, I'd really appreciate it. :) Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 07:44, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Next steps for Freedom of speech portal

1. Portal:Freedom of speech/Selected quote = do some more research, add some more quotes here up to forty (40), possibly more.
2. Portal:Freedom of speech/Selected anniversaries = flesh this out and add some more dates for later intervening ten (10) months.
3. After above is done, do another look-through, and then submit for portal peer review.

— Cirt (talk) 08:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Portal:Arts for featured portal consideration

• Portal:Arts

I've nominated Portal:Arts for featured portal candidacy, discussion is at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Arts. Thank you for your time, — Cirt (talk) 20:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Olly Blackburn

I was just doing my normal daily routine of looking at all the new living biographies...

I did remove stuff on the talk page. The archive and the talk header aren't needed yet. If there are alot of talk messages, then you add them. I also removed WikiProject British TV shows as it generally doesn't include people. I removed WikiProject Media and WikiProject Journalism. He wasn't a journalist and he didn't fit the criteria of Media... of course the last two were my personal opinion, so I may wrong again, as usual. Bgwhite (talk) 06:54, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

New article on music composer François-Eudes Chanfrault

• François-Eudes Chanfrault

I've created this new article. If you've got additional input for secondary sources, please feel free to suggest them at the article's talk page, I'd really appreciate it. :) Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 06:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the interwiki link at François-Eudes Chanfrault to fr:François-Eudes Chanfrault! Much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 18:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

you're welcome. I'm the same same personne who is translating your article. Louxema - 兔Talk with me on my French talk page - Angers 23:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Cirt. You have new messages at Freshacconci's talk page.
Message added 00:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

freshacconci talktalk 00:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

GA reviewing article Gwen Cooper

• Gwen Cooper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Talk:Gwen Cooper/GA1

Note: I will review this article. — Cirt (talk) 07:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

In the midst of a few read-throughs and copyedits prior to actual GA Review sweep of article text itself. — Cirt (talk) 16:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Possible interesting FAC candidate to read and review

• S&M (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/S&M (song)/archive6

— Cirt (talk) 07:14, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

FAC was closed, could maybe leave some suggestions at article's talk page. — Cirt (talk) 16:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Interesting article at peer review to read and review

• R v Peacock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Wikipedia:Peer review/R v Peacock/archive1

— Cirt (talk) 07:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Appears that peer review was closed on this one, could leave some suggestions at article's talk page perhaps. — Cirt (talk) 16:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Xplico restore

The Xplico Wikipedia page was deleted in the 2008, now the Xplico project is more popular and some Wikipedia pages have a reference about Xplico:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netsniff-ng

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_packet_analyzers

Xplico has more users and more features that Justniffer ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justniffer ) and it is officially used in BackTrack, Security Onion, DEFT-Linux and BackBox.

Is the time to restore the Xplico's Wikipedia page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.2.17.249 (talk) 11:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry you'll have to ask an admin about that, or post to the talk page of a related WP:WikiProject or two. — Cirt (talk) 19:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

New article on British actress Sian Breckin

• Sian Breckin

I've created this new article. If you've got additional input for secondary sources, please feel free to suggest them at the article's talk page, I'd really appreciate it. :) Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 23:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

A Free Ride

• A Free Ride (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/A Free Ride/archive1

This looks like an interesting read. — Cirt (talk) 18:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Gwen Cooper

Just posted a few edits I had running — a few grammar points; reduced reliance on in-universe material in characterisation sections and a bit of paring down of wordy sentences. I had also noticed that a couple of the websites that were referenced had been removed and replaced with a new website, I removed one reference and found an alternative source for the other. Sorry if this disrupts any open review. Let me know what you think — Eshlare (talk) 10:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Okay will try to take another revisit to it soon. — Cirt (talk) 12:46, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

jonas raskolnikov christiansen

somebody has closed the wikipedia page about jonas raskolnikoc christiansen, why? the man just died of cancer and was a black metal legend, there is also several unreleased bands, and music, made from the man before he died, yet to be released. this page should really be opened again, so that it can be updated as time goes by? please help? I just dig this mans music.

yours