Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 21:09 on 20 June 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

User-reported

• Spongebobrocks77 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Portal:Science: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. The totally disruptive vandalism edit on Portal:Science clearly shows this to be an obvious vandal and troll only user account. Needs to be indefinitely blocked before another incident of vandalism and trolling occurs again. TheGeneralUser (talk) 19:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) he hadn't edited since may.Greg Heffley 19:54, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

I know that Gregory Heffley, but those user accounts whose sole purpose is disruptive vandalism and trolling only can be blocked at any time once known. And they have no positive contributions whatsoever. A block is necessary to prevent further disruption to Wikipedia. TheGeneralUser (talk) 20:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Conceded; but he has only the one vandal edit, and that was last month. a block after next vandalism would be reasonable. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:03, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

• 173.55.155.6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Brand New: vandalism after final warning. Constant vandalism, vandalizing Brand New and adding ridiculous genres like "gothic rock" along with removing content. He does this every day. GunMetal Angel 22:13, 19 June 2012 (UTC)