List of open-source mobile phones: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m →Notes: WP:CHECKWIKI error fixes using AWB (9500) |
Robert Ham (talk | contribs) →Notes: Stoopid bot |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Notes == |
== Notes == |
||
[[Android (operating system)|Android]]-based devices do not appear on this list because of the heavy use of proprietary components, particularly drivers and applications |
[[Android (operating system)|Android]]-based devices do not appear on this list because of the heavy use of proprietary components, particularly drivers and applications.<ref>[[Android (operating system)#Licensing]] "drivers and firmware vital for the proper functioning of Android devices are usually proprietary"</ref> |
||
⚫ | <ref name="stallman2011">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/sep/19/android-free-software-stallman|publisher=The Guardian |title=Is Android really free software? – Google's smartphone code is often described as 'open' or 'free' – but when examined by the Free Software Foundation, it starts to look like something different|first=Richard |last=Stallman |date=2011-09-19|accessdate=2012-09-09|quote=''the software of Android versions 1 and 2 was mostly developed by Google; Google released it under the Apache 2.0 license, which is a lax free software license without copyleft. ... The version of Linux included in Android is not entirely free software, since it contains non-free "binary blobs"... Android is very different from the GNU/Linux operating system because it contains very little of GNU.''}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/android-and-users-freedom.html|title=Android and Users' Freedom – Support the Free Your Android campaign|first=Richard|last=Stallman |publisher=gnu.org |quote=''Even though the Android phones of today are considerably less bad than Apple or Windows smartphones, they cannot be said to respect your freedom.'' |date=2012-08-05 |accessdate=2012-09-09}}</ref> |
||
<ref>[[Android (operating system)#Licensing]] "drivers and firmware vital for the proper functioning of Android devices are usually proprietary"</ref> |
|||
⚫ | <ref name="stallman2011">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/sep/19/android-free-software-stallman|publisher=The Guardian |title=Is Android really free software? – Google's smartphone code is often described as 'open' or 'free' – but when examined by the Free Software Foundation, it starts to look like something different|first=Richard |last=Stallman |date=2011-09-19|accessdate=2012-09-09|quote=''the software of Android versions 1 and 2 was mostly developed by Google; Google released it under the Apache 2.0 license, which is a lax free software license without copyleft. ... The version of Linux included in Android is not entirely free software, since it contains non-free "binary blobs"... Android is very different from the GNU/Linux operating system because it contains very little of GNU.''}}</ref> |
||
.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/android-and-users-freedom.html|title=Android and Users' Freedom – Support the Free Your Android campaign|first=Richard|last=Stallman |publisher=gnu.org |quote=''Even though the Android phones of today are considerably less bad than Apple or Windows smartphones, they cannot be said to respect your freedom.'' |date=2012-08-05 |accessdate=2012-09-09}}</ref> |
|||
[[WebOS]] was initially available only under a proprietary license but the source code was later released under a free license by HP. |
[[WebOS]] was initially available only under a proprietary license but the source code was later released under a free license by HP. |
Revision as of 18:12, 27 September 2013
This is a list of mobile phones with open source operating systems.
Notes
Android-based devices do not appear on this list because of the heavy use of proprietary components, particularly drivers and applications.[1] [2][3]
WebOS was initially available only under a proprietary license but the source code was later released under a free license by HP.
All mobile phones have proprietary baseband (GSM module) firmware.[4]
List
Organization | Model | Mobile operating system | QWERTY (hardware) keyboard | Release date | Current state |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nokia | N900 | Maemo 5 (Fremantle) | Yes | 2009 | Discontinued |
Nokia | N950 (available to developers only) | MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan | Yes | 2011 | Discontinued |
Nokia | N9 | MeeGo 1.2 Harmattan | No | 2011 | Discontinued |
OpenMoko | Neo 1973 (code name GTA01) | Openmoko Linux, Qtopia (both Linux-based) | No | 2007, July 9 | Discontinued |
OpenMoko | Neo FreeRunner (code name GTA02) | Openmoko Linux, Qt Extended, Debian, SHR (Stable Hybrid Release), Android, Gentoo (all Linux-based), Inferno | No | 2008, June 24 | Discontinued |
Golden Delicious, GmbH | GTA04 | QtMoko, Debian, SHR (Stable Hybrid Release), Android | No | 2012, Q2 | Waiting for expressions of interest |
Aava mobile | Developer phone (available to developers only) | MeeGo | No | 2011 | Discontinued |
Tizen Association | Developer phone (available to developers only) | Tizen | No | 2013 | Discontinued |
HP | Palm Pre, Palm Pre Plus, Palm Pixi, Palm Pixi Plus, Pre 2, Pre 3, Veer, HP TouchPad supported devices full list | webOS | No | 2009-2012 | Discontinued |
GeeksPhone | Keon | Firefox OS | No | 2013, 23 April | Unknown |
GeeksPhone | Peak | Firefox OS | No | 2013, 23 April | Unknown |
GeeksPhone | Peak+ | Firefox OS | No | In development | |
ZTE | Open | Firefox OS | No | 2013, July | Available |
Jolla | Jolla mobile phone, logical successor of Nokia N9 | Sailfish OS | No | 2013, Q4 (Expected) | In development |
References
- ^ Android (operating system)#Licensing "drivers and firmware vital for the proper functioning of Android devices are usually proprietary"
- ^ Stallman, Richard (2011-09-19). "Is Android really free software? – Google's smartphone code is often described as 'open' or 'free' – but when examined by the Free Software Foundation, it starts to look like something different". The Guardian. Retrieved 2012-09-09.
the software of Android versions 1 and 2 was mostly developed by Google; Google released it under the Apache 2.0 license, which is a lax free software license without copyleft. ... The version of Linux included in Android is not entirely free software, since it contains non-free "binary blobs"... Android is very different from the GNU/Linux operating system because it contains very little of GNU.
- ^ Stallman, Richard (2012-08-05). "Android and Users' Freedom – Support the Free Your Android campaign". gnu.org. Retrieved 2012-09-09.
Even though the Android phones of today are considerably less bad than Apple or Windows smartphones, they cannot be said to respect your freedom.
- ^ Welte, Harald (2010-02-05). "OsmocomBB Project Rationale". Retrieved 2013-09-26.
Every mobile device that is connected to a cellular network runs some kind of baseband processor with highly proprietary and closed-source firmware.
See also
- FSO, Free smartphone org project: modern service-based middleware platform for Linux-based embedded systems, obeys "No strings attached" principle among others
- Greenphone
- TuxPhone
- Mobile device (mobile platform)
- OsmocomBB