Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Scientizzle (talk | contribs)
rv edits by 24.161.19.178
Line 7: Line 7:
==Outstanding Requests==
==Outstanding Requests==
<!-- Insert new request subpages immediately below this line, above older requests -->
<!-- Insert new request subpages immediately below this line, above older requests -->
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/RPH}}
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ravi5099}}
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ravi5099}}



Revision as of 07:34, 20 June 2006


    Read this first


    This is the place to request sockpuppet checks and other investigations requiring access to the Checkuser privilege. Possible alternatives are listed below.


    Requests likely to be accepted

    Code Situation Solution, requirements
    A Blatant attack or vandalism accounts, need IP block Submit new section at #Requests for IP check, below
    B Evading blocks, bans and remedies issued by arbitration committee Submit case subpage, including link to closed arb case
    C Ongoing, serious pattern vandalism with many incidents Submit case subpage, including diffs
    D Vote fraud, closed vote, fraud affects outcome Submit case subpage, including link to closed vote
    E 3RR violation using sockpuppets Submit case subpage, including diffs of violation
    F Evading blocks, bans and remedies issued by community Submit case subpage, including link to evidence of remedy
    G Does not fit above, but you believe check needed Submit case subpage, briefly summarize and justify

    Requests likely to be rejected

    Situation Solution
    Obvious, disruptive sock puppet Block, no checkuser needed
    Disruptive "throwaway" account used only for a few edits Block, no checkuser needed
    Checkuser on yourself to "prove your innocence" Such requests are rarely accepted, please do not ask
    Related to ongoing arbitration case Request checkuser on the arbitration case pages
    Vote fraud, ongoing vote Wait until vote closes before listing, or post at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets
    Vote fraud, closed vote, did not affect outcome List at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets
    Other disruption of articles List at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets
    Open proxy, IP address already known List at Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
    You want access to the checkuser tool yourself Contact the Arbitration Committee, but such access is granted rarely


    When submitting a request

    • If submitting a new case subpage, use the inputbox below; if adding to an existing case subpage, see WP:RFCU/P#Repeat requests.
    • Choose the code letter that best fits your request. Provide evidence such as diff links as required or requested. Note that some code letters inherently require specific evidence.
    • When listing suspected accounts or IP addresses, use the {{checkuser}} or {{checkip}} templates. Please do not use this template in a section header.
    • You may add your request to the top of the #Outstanding requests section, by adding {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/CASENAMEHERE}}. If you do not, clerks should check for pages in Category:Checkuser requests to be listed and will do this for you.
    • Sign your request.


    After submitting a request


    Privacy violation?

    Indicators and templates   (v  · e)
    These indicators are used by Checkusers, SPI clerks and other patrolling users, to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments.
    Case decisions:
     IP blocked  {{IPblock}}  Tagged  {{Stagged}}
     Blocked but awaiting tags  {{Sblock}}  Not possible  {{Impossible}}
     Blocked and tagged  {{Blockedandtagged}}  Blocked without tags  {{Blockedwithouttags}}
     No tags  {{No tags}}  Blocked and tagged. Closing.  {{Blockedtaggedclosing}}
    Information:
     Additional information needed  {{MoreInfo}}  Deferred  {{Deferred}}
    information Note:  {{TakeNote}}  In progress  {{Inprogress}}
    Clerk actions:
     Clerk assistance requested:  {{Clerk Request}}  Clerk note:  {{Clerk-Note}}
     Delisted  {{Delisted}}  Relisted  {{Relisted}}
     Clerk declined  {{Decline}}  Clerk endorsed  {{Endorse}}
    Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention  {{Selfendorse}} CheckUser requested  {{CURequest}}
    Specific to CheckUser:
     Confirmed  {{Confirmed}} Red X Unrelated  {{Unrelated}}
     Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). no No comment with respect to IP address(es).  {{Confirmed-nc}}
     Technically indistinguishable  {{Technically indistinguishable}}
     Likely  {{Likely}}  Unlikely  {{Unlikely}}
     Possible  {{Possible}}  Inconclusive  {{Inconclusive}}
    no Declined  {{Declined}} no Unnecessary  {{Unnecessary}}
     Stale (too old)  {{StaleIP}} no No comment  {{Nocomment}}
    crystal ball CheckUser is not a crystal ball  {{Crystalball}} fish CheckUser is not for fishing  {{Fishing}}
     CheckUser is not magic pixie dust  {{Pixiedust}} magic eight ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says:  {{8ball}}
     Endorsed by a checkuser  {{Cu-endorsed}}  Check declined by a checkuser  {{Cudecline}}
     Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely)  {{possilikely}}



    Note: Individuals making requests must check back regularly. The role of checkusers is to report findings; it is the responsibility of the individual making the request to see that appropriate action is taken.

    Outstanding Requests

    Clerk Attention Required

    Declined requests










    Completed requests



    Clever curmudgeon

    Clever curmudgeon (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) was blocked on 14th June for 1 month. This was the fifth block of this user. On 15th June, the account Bromyne (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki) was created. The first two edits of Bromyne were to User talk:Iodyne, a user that Clever curmudgeon knew, and conversed with frequently on each other's user talk pages. Since then, Bromyne has demonstrating similar behaviour to that of Clever curmudgeon, including (but not limited to)...

    • Conversing with Iodyne on User talk:Iodyne. Curmudgeon/Bromyne posts a message on Iodyne's talk page, and Iodyne responds on theirs. (Curmudgeon: [1] [2], Bromyne: [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Iodyne&diff=prev&oldid=58961847)
    • Curmudgeon once remarked that he would get popups to revert people if they reverted his actions [4]. Bromyne, a new user, suddenly gets popups as well, seemingly from nowhere [5]
    • Both users edit, and seem interested in, pornography related articles.
    • Iodyne once added an image of me onto Curmudgeon's userpage saying it was him, waiting for a "bowl of black dicks". [6]. Curmudgeon subsequently referred to me as "dark lord of the black dicks" [7]. Bromyne has recently said that anyone that opposes his reason to keep the article George R. Binks (an article created by Iodyne, that Clever curmudgeon took an interest in) then they need a bowl of "black dicks" [8]

    More evidence is available if required. I would like this checkuser to be performed to establish if Clever curmudgeon is indeed Bromyne, so that Bromyne can be blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of curmudgeon and curmudgeon's block extended for block evasion. Lord Deskana I VALUE YOUR OPINIONS 22:15, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
    Subsequent requests related to this user should be made below, in a new section.


    If you are creating a new request about this user, don't forget to edit this section and add
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser}}
    The previous request (shown above), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (it will still appear here).

    </noinclude>