Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

"WP:RVAN" redirects here. For information on how to respond to vandalism, see Wikipedia:Vandalism § How to respond to vandalism.

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 05:55 on 15 September 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

Bot-reported

• ShyAndroid (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1311 (LTA 1311, details). Note: Please see the comment(s) at the top of filter 1311 before taking any action. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

  False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Fairly certain after reviewing the filter criteria, but if anyone else wants to give this a second set of eyes, please go ahead. Best, Spencer^T•C 03:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

• 190.245.170.203 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• Iantoz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Most edits have been to refspam TechPurge into articles, even after multiple warnings. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:27, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
• Logan.gentry (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)link-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splug — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexbacho (talk • contribs) 16:23, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

This page is for reporting users, not pages. The page is already tagged for speedy deletion, there's nothing more you need to do.

Oxfordwang (talk) 16:24, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Declined. Not the right pace to report a page. Amortias (T)(C) 17:17, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

• 207.112.110.126 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Lauren Toyota (diff): vandalism after final warning. Repeated removal of sourced content on a BLP in spite of multiple warnings (by an IP geolocating to the area where the subject lives, so there's probably a COI involved...). Thomas.W ^talk 18:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
• 24.43.106.70 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. Amanda Smalls 19:10, 24 October 2014 (UTC)