Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 01:48 on 18 August 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

User-reported

• Lysvincent (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Persistant addition of unsourced content to music articles, numerous warnings. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
• 184.88.215.95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Repeated vandalism of the same article, despite warnings. 69.165.196.103 (talk) 01:49, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. User only got one warning, issued approx. three minutes ago. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

• 79.52.184.240 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On The King of Comedy (1983 film): vandalism after final warning. Repeated addition of improperly cited material in the lede section of this article; refuses to discuss or respond to messages or warnings. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 03:15, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
• 64.72.87.98 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism. See also edit filter log. 172.58.41.93 (talk) 03:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

• Note: User is in the category: Shared IP addresses from educational institutions. HBC AIV helperbot11 (talk) 03:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Yeah, no, not at all. Not vandalism: appear to be good-faith edits, even if The ed17 didn't like them. I don't know what I'm supposed to see in the filter log. Drmies (talk) 03:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

My bad, I interpreted these edits as unexplained content removal. I thought that there were more edits than just those, too. But I guess not... 172.58.41.93 (talk) 03:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

• Annieistrash (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Even the username is intended as an attack. 2601:188:1:AEA0:9C72:D001:B02E:25B8 (talk) 06:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)