Christ myth theory

For discussion of Jesus in a comparative mythological and religious context, see Jesus in comparative mythology. For the body of myths associated with Christianity, see Christian mythology. For the scholarly study of the life of Jesus, see Historical Jesus. For analysis of information supporting the historical existence of Jesus, see Historicity of Jesus and Sources for the historicity of Jesus.

For the debate over the validity of stories in the New Testament, see Historical reliability of the Gospels.

Christ myth theory
The Resurrection of Christ by Noel Coypel (1700)—some mythicists see this as a case of a dying-and-rising god.
Description	Jesus of Nazareth never existed; or if he did, he had virtually nothing to do with the founding of Christianity and the accounts in the gospels.
Early proponents	Thomas Paine (1737-1809) Charles François Dupuis (1742–1809) Constantin-François Volney (1757–1820) Richard Carlile (1790–1843) Bruno Bauer (1809–1882) Edwin Johnson (1842–1901) Dutch Radical School (1880–1950) Albert Kalthoff (1850–1906) W. B. Smith (1850–1934) J. M. Robertson (1856–1933) Thomas Whittaker (1856–1935) Arthur Drews (1865–1935) Paul-Louis Couchoud (1879–1959) Alvin Boyd Kuhn (1880–1963)
Modern proponents	G. A. Wells, Tom Harpur, Michael Martin, Thomas L. Thompson, Thomas L. Brodie, Robert M. Price, Richard Carrier, Earl Doherty, Raphael Lataster
Subjects	Historical Jesus, Early Christianity, Ancient history

The Christ myth theory (also known as the Jesus myth theory, Jesus mythicism, mythicism, or Jesus ahistoricity theory) is the proposition that Christianity started with the belief in a new deity, named Jesus, "who was later historicized" in the Gospels, which are "essentially allegory and fiction." Alternatively in "simpler terms" — given by Bart Ehrman — "the historical Jesus did not exist. Or if he did, he had virtually nothing to do with the founding of Christianity."

In modern scholarship, the Christ Myth Theory is a fringe theory not supported by any tenured specialists in biblical criticism or cognate disciplines. The Christ myth theory contradicts the mainstream historical view, which is that while the gospels include many mythical or legendary elements, these are religious elaborations added to the biography of a historical Jesus who did live in 1st-century Roman Palestine, was baptized by John the Baptist and was crucified by the order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate.

Overview

The main arguments from the mythicists are the lack of biographical information on Jesus from early Christian and other sources, the so-called argument from silence; and the mythical and allegorical nature of the Christ of Paul and the Jesus of the Gospels. Most Christ mythicists agree that the evidence for the existence of a historical Jesus Christ is weak at best, pointing at a series of perceived peculiarities in the sources which they regard as untrustworthy for a historical account, and noting the reliance on Jewish writings and the similarities of early Christianity and the Christ figure with the mystery religions of the Greco-Roman world:

• The Pauline epistles are dismissed because, aside from a few passages which may have been interpolations, they contain no references to an earthly Jesus who lived in the flesh. There is a complete absence of any detailed biographical information such as might be expected if Jesus had been a contemporary of Paul. Therefore, he is probably writing about either a mythical entity, a celestial deity, or "a savior figure patterned after similar figures within ancient mystery religions" —named Jesus.
• The Gospels are not historical records, but theological writings, which are based on a variety of sources and influences, including Old Testamentical writings, Greek stoic philosophy, and the exegetical methods of Philo. The Gospels weave together various Jesus-traditions, most notably "ideas very important in the Jewish Wisdom literature" and the "supernatural personage" of Paul's epistles, and may be regarded as myth or legendary fiction which have imposed "a fictitious historical narrative" on this "mythical cosmic savior figure."
• Christianity arose in the Greco-Roman world of the first and second century CE, synthesizing Jewish and Greek philosophy. Early Christianity shared common philosophical and religious ideas with other religions of the time, including the ideas of personified aspects of God, and of a dying-and-arising savior deity.
• No independent eyewitness accounts survive, in spite of the fact that many authors were writing at that time. Early second-century Roman accounts contain very little evidence, and may depend on Christian sources.
• Christianity originated from a Jewish sect in a milieu where some Jews practised a form of proto-gnosticism — seeking salvation by revealed gnosis — via a mediator between God and humans, i.e. an intermediary variously known as one like a son of man, the divine logos, etc.. And that from the cultus of Paul, a divergent form of this salvation theology was later promoted for non-Jews.

Some mythicists hold — in terms given by Robert M. Price — the "Jesus agnosticism" viewpoint, while others go further and hold the "Jesus atheism" viewpoint. Some scholars have made the case that there are a number of plausible "Jesuses" that could have existed, but that there can be no certainty as to which Jesus was the historical Jesus. Others have said that Jesus may have lived far earlier, in a dimly remembered remote past. A number of writers adduce various arguments to show that Christianity has syncretistic or mythical roots. As such, the historical Jesus should not be regarded as the founder of the religion, even if he did exist.

The origins of Christianity

Research questions

The origins of Christianity, and the historical Jesus and the historicity of Jesus, are a matter of longstanding debates in theological and historical research. Within a few years after the proposed death of Jesus in c. 33 CE, already before Paul started preaching, a number of proto-Christian communities seem to have been in existence. A central question is how these communities developed, and what their original convictions were. A wide range of beliefs and ideas can be found in early Christianity, including adoptionism, docetism and gnosticism, which were deemed heretical by the proto-orthodox Church.

While orthodox Christian theology and dogmas view Jesus as the incarnation of God/Christ on earth, mainstream scholarship views Jesus as a real person who was subsequently deified. Mythicists take yet another approach, presuming a widespread set of Jewish ideas on personified aspects of God, which were subsequently historicised when proto-Christianity spread among non-Jewish converts. Mythicists have been criticised for not explaining the rapid rise of early Christianity.

Christ myth theory

According to modern proponents of the Christ myth theory, Christianity started with the belief in a new deity called Jesus, "a spiritual, mythical figure," who was derived from Jewish writings, and shows Greek influences and similarities with Pagan saviour deities. Elements of the "Christ myth," and its cultus, can be found in the Pauline epistles, for example the Christ hymn of Phil. 2:6-11. This new deity was fleshed out in the Gospels, which added a narrative framework and Cynic-like teachings, and eventually came to be perceived as a historical biography. According to Wells et al., these sayings may come from a real person, of whom close to nothing can be known.

While proponents like Couchoud, Wells, Doherty and Price are concerned with the origins of Christianity, the perception of and debate about the CMT has increasingly turned to the simpler question whether Jesus existed or not. And consequently with some scholars proposing a more moderate position.

Arguments

The main arguments from the mythicists are the lack of biographical information on Jesus from early Christian and non-Christian sources, the socalled argument from silence, and the mythical and allegorical nature of the Christ of Paul and the Jesus of the Gospels. They further note that the Gospels are a composite of various strands of thought, and note the similarities of early Christianity and the Christ figure with contemporary mystery religions.

Pauline epistles

A 3rd century fragment of Paul's letter to the Romans

The seven undisputed Pauline epistles considered by scholarly consensus to be genuine epistles are generally dated to 50–60 AD (i.e. approximately twenty to thirty years after the generally accepted time period for the death of Jesus, around 30–36 AD), and are the earliest surviving Christian texts that may include information about Jesus.

Mythicists' view

Christ myth theorists generally reject the usefulness of these letters. Willem Christiaan van Manen of the Dutch school of radical criticism noted various anachronisms in the Pauline Epistles. He claimed that they could not have been written in their final form earlier than the 2nd century. He noted that the Marcionite school was the first to publish the epistles, and that Marcion used them as justification for his gnostic and docetic views that Jesus' incarnation was not in a physical body. Van Manen also studied Marcion's version of Galatians in contrast to the canonical version, and argued that the canonical version was a later revision which de-emphasized the Gnostic aspects.

G. A. Wells criticized the infrequency of the reference to Jesus in the Pauline letters. He says there is no information in them about Jesus's parents, place of birth, teachings, trial, nor crucifixion. Wells also argues that Paul and the other epistle writers—the earliest Christian writers—do not provide any support for the idea that Jesus lived early in the 1st century. For Paul, Jesus may have existed many decades, if not centuries, before. According to Wells the earliest strata of the New Testament literature presented Jesus as "a basically supernatural personage only obscurely on Earth as a man at some unspecified period in the past". In The Jesus Myth, Wells argues that two Jesus narratives fused into one: Paul's mythical Jesus and a minimally historical Jesus whose teachings were preserved in the Q document, a hypothetical common source for the gospels of Matthew and Luke.

Robert M. Price wrote that "the historical Jesus problem replicates itself in the case of Paul" and that the epistles have the same limitations as the Gospels as historical evidence. He sees the epistles as a compilation of fragments, possibly with a Gnostic core. And he contends that Marcion (c.85–c.160) was responsible for much of the Pauline corpus or even wrote the letters himself, while criticizing the circumstantial ad hominem fallacy of fellow Christ Myth theorists holding the mid-first-century dating of the epistles (e.g. Galatians is conventionally dated c. 53 AD) for their own apologetical reasons. Price argues that passages such as Galatians 1:18-20, Galatians 4:4, and 1 Corinthians 15:3-11 are late Catholic interpolations, and that 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 was unlikely to have been written by a Jewish person.

Richard Carrier argues that Paul is actually writing about a celestial deity named Jesus. He notes that there is little if any concrete information about Christ's earthly life in the Pauline epistles, even though Jesus is mentioned over three hundred times. According to Carrier, the genuine Pauline epistles show that the Apostle Peter and the Apostle Paul believed in a visionary or dream Jesus, based on a pesher of Septuagint verses Zechariah 6 and 3, Daniel 9, and Isaiah 52-53. Carrier further argues that according to Paul (Phil. 2. 7), Christ "came 'in the likeness of men' (homoiomati anthropon) and was found 'in a form like a man' (schemati euretheis hos anthropos) and (in Rom. 8.3) that he was only sent 'in the likeness of sinful flesh' (en homoiomati sarkos hamartias). This is a doctrine of a preexistent being assuming a human body, but not being fully transformed into a man, just looking like one..."

Mainstream view

Modern biblical scholarship also notes that Paul has relatively little to say on the biographical information of Jesus. However, most scholars view the Pauline letters as essential elements in the study of the historical Jesus. The Pauline letters at times refer to creeds, or confessions of faith, that predate their writings. For instance, 1 Corinthians 15:11 refers to others before Paul who preached the creed. These Pre-Pauline creeds date to within a few years of Jesus' death, and developed within the Christian community in Jerusalem. Scholars generally view these as indications that the existence and death of Jesus was part of Christian tradition a few years after his death and over a decade before the writing of the Pauline epistles. James Dunn states that 1 Corinthians 15:3 indicates that in the 30s Paul was taught about the death of Jesus a few years earlier.

Eddy and Boyd present a summary of information about Jesus' earthly life presented in the Pauline epistles. For example, in Galatians 1:19, Paul refers to the "Lord's brother" who was alive at the time of Paul; another that 1 Corinthians 15:3-8 refers to those who had interacted with Jesus as Paul's contemporaries; and in 1 Thessalonians 2:14-16 Paul refers to the Jews "who both killed the Lord Jesus" and "drove out us" as the same people, indicating that the death of Jesus was within the same time frame as the persecution of Paul. Gregory A. Boyd and Paul Rhodes Eddy doubt that Paul viewed Jesus similar to the savior deities found in ancient mystery religions.

Two more elements in the Pauline letters that pertain to the existence of Jesus and his being a Jew include Galatians 4:4 which states that he was "born of a woman" and Romans 1:3 that he was "born under the law".

The Gospels

Main article: The Gospels

Dating and authorship

According to mythicists, the Gospels are not eye-witness accounts, but later accounts which were not written by Jesus' disciples. According to Richard Carrier, "The Gospels cannot really be dated, nor are the real authors known. Their names were assigned early, but not early enough for us to be confident they were accurately known. It is based on speculation that Mark was the first, written between AD 60 and 70, Matthew second, between AD 70 and 80, Luke (and Acts) third, between AD 80 and 90, and John last, between AD 90 and 100."

Modern biblical scholarship also places the dates for most of the gospels decades after the death of Jesus c. 30 AD, but within the latter half of the first century. Dr. Charles E. Hill, a Professor of New Testament and Early Christianity at Reformed Theological Seminary, agrees with myth proponents that the canonical gospels were not written by Jesus's disciples, but believes they were written by immediate or near immediate successors and quickly accepted by the majority of the Church.

Genre

Any study of the gospels must first determine the genre under which they fall, in order to interpret them correctly, since genre "is a key convention guiding both the composition and the interpretation of writings". The gospels authors may have intended to write novels, myths, histories, or biographies, which are different genres, and have a tremendous impact on how they ought to be interpreted. Among contemporary scholars there is consensus that the gospels are a type of ancient biography, though Rudolf Bultmann notes that the gospel authors had no interest in history or in a historical Jesus, and Robert Price notes that Robert M. Fowler, Frank Kermode, and Randel Helms demonstrate that the gospels are a fictional composition, while Michael Vines notes that the gospel of Mark may have aspects similar to a Jewish novel. Some myth proponents suggest that some parts of the New Testament were meant to appeal to Gentiles as familiar allegories rather than history.

Jewish sources

Some myth proponents note that some stories in the New Testament seem to try to reinforce Old Testament prophecies and repeat stories about figures like Elijah, Elisha, Moses and Joshua in order to appeal to Jewish converts. Robert Price notes that almost all the Gospel-stories have parallels in Old Testamentical and other traditions, concluding that the Gospels are no independent sources for a historical Jesus, but "legend and myth, fiction and redaction."

Arguments drawing comparisons between the New and Old Testaments have traditionally been made by Christian theologians in defense of their teachings, but without doubting a historical Jesus.

Greek influences

In Christ and the Caesars (1877), Bruno Bauer suggested that Christianity was a synthesis of the Stoicism of Seneca the Younger, Greek Neo-Platonism, and the Jewish theology of Philo as developed by pro-Roman Jews such as Josephus. This new religion was in need of a founder, and created its Christ. In a review of Bauer's work, Robert M. Price notes that Bauer's basic stance regarding the Stoic tone and the fictional nature of the Gospels are still repeated in contemporary scholarship.

Fusion of characters

The Gospels may be regarded as myth or legendary fiction which have imposed "a fictitious historical narrative" on a "mythical cosmic savior figure." According to Wells a minimally historical Jesus existed, whose teachings were preserved in the Q document. According to Wells, the Gospels weave together two Jesus narratives, namely Paul's mythical Jesus and the Galilean preacher of the Q document. Doherty disagrees with Wells regarding this teacher of the Q-document, arguing that he was an allegoral character who personified Wisdom, and came to be regarded as the founder of the Q-community. According to Doherty, Q's Jesus and Paul's Christ were combined in the Gospel of Mark by a predominantly gentile community.

According to Doherty, the Jesus of Paul was a divine Son of God, existing in a spiritual realm where he was crucified and resurrected. This mythological Jesus was based on exegesis of the Old Testament and mystical visions of a risen Jesus. Robert M. Price argues that the Gospels are a type of legendary fiction, and that the story of Jesus portrayed in the Gospels fits the mythic hero archetype.

Judeo-Greco-Roman background and similarities

See also: Origins of Christianity and Gnosticism

Judeo-Greco-Roman background

With the conquests of Alexander the Great, the Greek culture and language spread throughout the eastern Mediterranean world, influencing the already existing cultures there. The conquest of Rome of this area added to the cultural diversity, but also to a sense of alienation and pessimism. A rich diversity of religious and philosophical ideas was available, and Judaism was held in high regard by non-Jews, for its monotheistic ideas and its high moral standards. Yet, monotheism was also offered by Greek philosophy, especially Platonism, with its high God and the intermediairy Logos. According to Doherty, "out of this rich soil of ideas arose Christianity, a product of both Jewish and Greek philosophy," echoing Bruno Bauer, who argued that Christianity was a synthesis of Stoicism, Greek Neo-Platonism, and Jewish thought.

Early Christian diversity

Early Christianity was wildly diverse, with proto-orthodoxy and "heretical" views like Gnosticism alongside each other. According to Doherty, the rapid growth of early Christian communities, and the great variety of ideas cannot be explained by a single missionary effort, but points to parallel developments, which arose at various places, and competed for support. Paul's arguments against rival apostles also point to this diversity. Doherty further notes that Yeshua ("Jesus") is a generic name, meaning "Yahweh saves," and refers to the concept of Divine salvation, which could apply to any kind of saving entity or wisdom.

Similarities to Jewish celestial Jesus

According to Carrier, originally "Jesus was the name of a celestial being, subordinate to God." According to Carrier, "This 'Jesus' would most likely have been the same archangel identified by Philo of Alexandria as already extant in Jewish theology." Philo knew this figure by all of the attributes Paul already knew Jesus by: the firstborn son of God (Epistle to the Romans 8:29), the celestial 'image of God' (Second Epistle to the Corinthians 4:4), and God’s agent of creation (First Epistle to the Corinthians 8:6). He was also God’s celestial high priest (Heb. 2:17, 4:14, etc.) and God’s 'Logos.' And Philo says this being was identified as the figure named 'Jesus' in the Book of Zechariah.

Other scholars have also noted the extent and significance of Jewish belief in a chief angel acting as a heavenly mediator during the Second Temple period, as well as the similarities between Jesus and this chief celestial angel.

Similarities to Logos and Wisdom

A somewhat similar idea to the Greek Logos was found in Judaism, where Wisdom, a personified part of God, brought knowledge of God and the Law. Similar idea were also developed in other cultures and religions. According to Wells, the historical Jesus was derived from this Wisdom traditions, the personification of an eternal aspect of God, who came to visit human beings. Doherty notes that the concept of a spiritual Christ was the result of common philosophical and religious ideas of the first and second century CE, in which the idea of an intermediary force between God and the world were common. Doherty further notes that divine inspiration was a common concept.

Separately from mythicism, scholar of ancient religious studies Peter Schäfer contends that Philo's Logos was likely derived from his understanding of the "postbiblical Wisdom literature, in particular the Wisdom of Solomon." And Professor of New Testament at Loyola University, Urban C. von Wahlde notes that the Wisdom literature and the philosophical writings of Philo may furnish "the background to the Logos of the Johannine Prologue."

Similarities with mystery religions

The Christ of Paul shares similarities with the Greco-Roman mystery cults. Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy explicitly argue that Jesus was a deity, akin to the mystery cults. while Dorothy Murdock argues that the Christ myth draws heavily on the Egyptian story of Osiris and Horus. According to Robert Price, the story of Jesus portrayed in the Gospels is akin to the mythic hero archetype. The "mythic hero archetype" is present in many cultures who often have miraculous conceptions or virgin births heralded by wise men and marked by a star, are tempted by or fight evil forces, die on a hill, appear after death, and then ascend to heaven.

However, Christian theologians have also cited the mythic hero archetype as a defense of Christian teaching while completely affirming a historical Jesus. Secular academics have also pointed out that the teachings of Jesus marked "a radical departure from all the conventions by which heroes had been defined." Many mainstream biblical scholars respond that most of these parallels are either coincidences or without historical basis and/or that these parallels do not prove that a Jesus figure did not live.

No independent eyewitness accounts

Lack of surviving historic records

Myth proponents claim there is significance in the lack of surviving historic records about Jesus of Nazareth from any non-Jewish author until the second century, adding that Jesus left no writings or other archaeological evidence. Using the argument from silence, they note that Jewish philosopher Philo of Alexandria did not mention Jesus when he wrote about the cruelty of Pontius Pilate around 40 CE.

Mainstream biblical scholars point out that much of the writings of antiquity have been lost and that there was little written about any Jew or Christian in this period. Ehrman points out that we do not have archaeological or textual evidence for the existence of most people in the ancient world; even famous people like Pontius Pilate, whom the Myth Theorists agree to have existed. Robert Hutchinson notes that this is also true of Flavius Josephus, despite "a personal favorite of the Roman Emperor Vespasian." Hutchinson quotes Ehrman, who notes that Josephus is never mentioned in 1st century Greek and Roman sources, despite being "a personal friend of the emperor." According to Classical historian and popular author Michael Grant, if the same criterium is applied to others, "we can reject the existence of a mass of pagan personages whose reality as historical figures is never questioned."

Josephus and Tacitus

Yet, there are three Non-Christian sources which are typically used to study and establish the historicity of Jesus — two mentions in Josephus, and one mention in the Roman source Tacitus. Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews, written around 93–94 AD, includes two references to the biblical Jesus in Books 18 and 20. Myth proponents argue that the Testimonium Flavianum may have been a partial interpolation or forgery by Christian apologist Eusebius in the fourth century or by others. Some myth proponents also speculate that when Josephus called James the "brother" of Jesus of Nazareth in the Antiquities, he was referring to another Jesus, to a mythic Christ that had already been historicized, or to fraternal brotherhood rather than a literal sibling. This is dismissed by some in mainstream academia on the grounds that there is no evidence of a supposed "Jerusalem brotherhood".

Roman historian Tacitus referred to 'Christus' and his execution by Pontius Pilate in his Annals (written c. AD 116), book 15, chapter 44. Christ Myth theory supporters such as G. A. Wells and Carrier contend that sources such as Tacitus and others were written decades after the supposed events, include no independent traditions that relate to Jesus and hence can provide no confirmation of historical facts about him.

18–19th centuries proponents

Volney and Dupuis

French historian Constantin-François Volney, one of the earliest myth theorists

The beginnings of the formal denial of the existence of Jesus can be traced to late 18th-century France, and the works of Constantin François Chassebœuf de Volney and Charles-François Dupuis. Volney and Dupuis argued that Christianity was an amalgamation of various ancient mythologies and that Jesus was a totally mythical character.

Dupuis argued that ancient rituals in Syria, Egypt and Persia had influenced the Christian story which was allegorized as the histories of solar deities, such as Sol Invictus. He said that the resurrection of Jesus was an allegory for the growth of the sun's strength in the sign of Aries at the spring equinox.

Volney argued that Abraham and Sarah were derived from Brahma and his wife Saraswati, and that Christ was related to Krishna. Volney made use of a draft version of Dupuis' work, but at times differed from him, e.g. in arguing that the gospel stories were not intentionally created, but were compiled organically.

Volney's perspective became associated with the ideas of the French Revolution, which hindered the acceptance of these views in England. Despite this, his work gathered significant following among British and American radical thinkers during the 19th century.

Strauss

German Prof. David Strauss.

In 1835, German theologian David Friedrich Strauss published his extremely controversial The Life of Jesus, Critically Examined (Das Leben Jesu). While not denying that Jesus existed, he did argue that the miracles in the New Testament were mythical retellings of normal events as supernatural happenings. According to Strauss, the early church developed these miracle stories to present Jesus as a fulfillment of Jewish prophecies of what the Messiah would be like. This rationalist perspective was in direct opposition to the supernaturalist view that the bible was accurate both historically and spiritually.

The book caused an uproar across Europe. Anthony Ashley-Cooper, 7th Earl of Shaftesbury called it "the most pestilential book ever vomited out of the jaws of hell," and Strauss' appointment as chair of theology at the University of Zürich caused such controversy that the authorities offered him a pension before he had a chance to start his duties.

Bauer

German Prof. Bruno Bauer.

German Bruno Bauer, who taught at the University of Bonn, took Strauss' arguments further and became the first author to systematically argue that Jesus did not exist.

Beginning in 1841, in his Criticism of the Gospel History of the Synoptics, Bauer argued that Jesus was primarily a literary figure. However, he left open the question of whether a historical Jesus existed at all. Finally, in his Criticism of the Pauline Epistles (1850-1852) and in A Critique of the Gospels and a History of their Origin (1850–1851), Bauer argued that Jesus had not existed. Bauer's work was heavily criticized at the time; in 1839 he was removed from his position at the University of Bonn, and his work did not have much impact on future myth theorists.

Higgins and Graves

In his two-volume, 867-page book Anacalypsis (1836), English gentleman Godfrey Higgins said that "the mythos of the Hindus, the mythos of the Jews and the mythos of the Greeks are all at bottom the same; and ... are contrivances under the appearance of histories to perpetuate doctrines," and that Christian editors “either from roguery or folly, corrupted them all.” In his 1875 book The World's Sixteen Crucified Saviors, American Kersey Graves said that many demigods from different countries shared similar stories, traits or quotes as Jesus. Graves used Higgins as the main source for his arguments. The validity of the claims in the book have been greatly criticized by Christ myth proponents like Richard Carrier and largely dismissed by biblical scholars.

Massey

Starting in the 1870s, English poet and author Gerald Massey became interested in Egyptology and reportedly taught himself Egyptian hieroglyphics at the British Museum. In 1883, he published The Natural Genesis where he asserted parallels between Jesus and the Egyptian god Horus. His other major work, Ancient Egypt: The Light of the World, was published shortly before his death in 1907. His assertions have influenced various later writers such as Alvin Boyd Kuhn and Tom Harpur. Despite criticisms from Stanley Porter and Ward Gasque, Massey's theories regarding Egyptian etymologies for certain scriptures are supported by noted contemporary Egyptologists.

Radical Dutch school and others

In the 1870s and 1880s, a group of scholars associated with the University of Amsterdam, known in German scholarship as the Radical Dutch school, rejected the authenticity of the Pauline epistles, and took a generally negative view of the Bible's historical value. Abraham Dirk Loman argued in 1881 that all New Testament writings belonged to the 2nd century, and doubted that Jesus was a historical figure, but later said the core of the gospels was genuine.

Additional early Christ myth proponents included Swiss skeptic Rudolf Steck, English historian Edwin Johnson, English radical Rev. Robert Taylor, and his associate Richard Carlile.

Early 20th century proponents

During the early 20th century, several writers published arguments against Jesus' historicity, often drawing on the work of liberal theologians, who tended to deny any value to sources for Jesus outside the New Testament, and limited their attention to Mark and the hypothetical Q source. They also made use of the growing field of religious history which found sources for Christian ideas in Greek and Oriental mystery cults, rather than Judaism. Joseph Klausner wrote that biblical scholars "tried their hardest to find in the historic Jesus something which is not Judaism; but in his actual history they have found nothing of this whatever, since this history is reduced almost to zero. It is therefore no wonder that at the beginning of this century there has been a revival of the eighteenth and nineteenth century view that Jesus never existed."

The work of social anthropologist Sir James George Frazer has had an influence on various myth theorists, although Frazer himself believed that Jesus existed. In 1890 he published the first edition of The Golden Bough which attempted to define the shared elements of religious belief. This work became the basis of many later authors who argued that the story of Jesus was a fiction created by Christians. After a number of people claimed that he was a myth theorist, in the 1913 expanded edition of The Golden Bough Frazer expressly stated that his theory assumed a historical Jesus.

In 1900, Scottish MP John Mackinnon Robertson argued that Jesus never existed but was an invention by a first-century messianic cult. In Robertson's view, religious groups invent new gods to fit the needs of the society of the time. Robertson argued that a solar deity symbolized by the lamb and the ram had long been worshiped by an Israelite cult of Joshua and that this cult had then invented a new messianic figure, Jesus of Nazareth. Robertson argued that a possible source for the Christian myth may have been the Talmudic story of the executed Jesus Pandera which dates to 100 BCE. Robertson considered the letters of Paul the earliest surviving Christian writings, but viewed them as primarily concerned with theology and morality, rather than historical details. He viewed references to the twelve apostles and the institution of the Eucharist as stories that must have developed later among gentile believers who were converted by Jewish evangelists like Paul.

The English school master George Robert Stowe Mead argued in 1903 that Jesus had existed, but that he had lived in 100 BCE. Mead based his argument on the Talmud, which pointed to Jesus being crucified c. 100 BCE. In Mead's view, this would mean that the Christian gospels are mythical. Tom Harpur has compared Mead's impact on myth theory to that of Bruno Bauer and Arthur Drews.

In 1909, school teacher John Eleazer Remsburg published The Christ, which made a distinction between a possible historical Jesus ("Jesus of Nazareth") and the Jesus of the Gospels ("Jesus of Bethlehem"). Remsburg's thought that there was good reason to believe that the historical Jesus existed, but that the "Christ of Christianity" was a mythological creation. Remsburg compiled a list of 42 names of "writers who lived and wrote during the time, or within a century after the time" who Remsburg felt should have written about Jesus if the Gospels account was reasonably accurate but who did not.

German Prof. Arthur Drews.

Also in 1909, German philosophy professor Christian Heinrich Arthur Drews wrote The Christ Myth to argue that Christianity had been a Jewish Gnostic cult that spread by appropriating aspects of Greek philosophy and life-death-rebirth deities. In his later books The Witnesses to the Historicity of Jesus (1912) and The Denial of the Historicity of Jesus in Past and Present (1926), Drews reviewed the biblical scholarship of his time as well as the work of other myth theorists, attempting to show that everything reported about the historical Jesus had a mythical character. Drews met with criticism from Nikolai Berdyaev who claimed that Drews was an anti-Semite who argued against the historical existence of Jesus for the sake of Aryanism. Drews took part in a series of public debates with theologians and historians who opposed his arguments.

Drews' work found fertile soil in the Soviet Union, where Marxist–Leninist atheism was the official doctrine of the state. Soviet leader Lenin argued that it was imperative in the struggle against religious obscurantists to form a union with people like Drews. Several editions of Drews' The Christ Myth were published in the Soviet Union from the early 1920s onwards, and his arguments were included in school and university textbooks. Public meetings asking "Did Christ live?" were organized, during which party operatives debated with clergymen.

In 1927, British philosopher Bertrand Russell stated in his lecture Why I Am Not a Christian that "historically it is quite doubtful that Jesus existed, and if he did we do not know anything about him, so that I am not concerned with the historical question, which is a very difficult one", though Russell did nothing to further develop the idea.

Church of Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard was convinced that Jesus never existed, stating that Christianity evolved from the "R6 Implant": "The man on the cross. There was no Christ! The Roman Catholic Church, through watching the dramatizations of people picked up some little fragments of R6."

Modern proponents

Paul-Louis Couchoud

Drews influenced French philosopher Paul-Louis Couchoud, who published in the 1920s and 1930s but was a predecessor for contemporary mythicists. According to Couchoud, Christianity started with the belief in a new deity, named Jesus, and argued that Jesus is not a "myth," but a "religious conception." He further argued that it is impossible to assume that Jews would have deified a mere man, and that Jesus was a new deity, not a person who was deified.

Robert Price mentions Couchoud's comment on the Christ Hymn, one of the relics of the Christ cults to which Paul converted. Couchoud noted that in this hymn the name "Jesus" was given to the Christ after his torturous death, implying that there cannot have been a ministry by a teacher called Jesus.

George Albert Wells

English professor of German George Albert Wells (1926-2017) had a profound impact on the Christ myth theory, according to New Testament scholar Graham Stanton. British theologian Kenneth Grayston advised Christians to acknowledge the difficulties raised by Wells.

In his early work, including Did Jesus Exist? (1975), Wells argued that the Gospels were written decades after Jesus's death by Christians who were theologically motivated, but had no personal knowledge of him. Therefore, he concluded that a rational person should believe the gospels only if they are independently confirmed. Atheist philosopher and scholar Michael Martin supported his thesis, claiming: "Jesus is not placed in a historical context and the biographical details of his life are left unsuspected...a strong prima facie case challenging the historicity of Jesus can be constructed". He adds, in his book 'The Case Against Christianity' "Well's argument against the historicity [of Jesus] is sound".

Later, Wells concluded that a historical Jesus figure did exist. His Jesus was a Galilean preacher, whose teachings were preserved in the Q document, a hypothetical common source for the gospels of Matthew and Luke. However, he continued to insist that Biblical Jesus did not exist. He argued that stories such as the virgin birth, the crucifixion around A.D. 30 under Pilate, and the resurrection, should be regarded as legendary.

Biblical scholar Robert Van Voorst said that with this argument Wells had performed an about-face. However, other scholars continue to note Wells as a mythicist.

In his 2009 book Cutting Jesus Down to Size, Wells clarified that he believes the Gospels represent the fusion of two originally independent streams: a Galilean preaching tradition, and the supernatural personage of Paul's early epistles. However, he says that both figures owe much of their substance to ideas from the Jewish wisdom literature.

Earl Doherty

Canadian writer Earl Doherty (b.1941) was introduced to the Christ myth theme by a lecture by Wells in the 1970s. Doherty follows the lead of Wells, but disagrees on the historicity of Jesus, arguing that "everything in Paul points to a belief in an entirely divine Son who "lived" and acted in the spiritual realm, in the same mythical setting in which all the other savior deities of the day were seen to operate." According to Doherty, Paul's Christ originated as a myth derived from Middle Platonism with some influence from Jewish mysticism, and belief in a historical Jesus emerged only among Christian communities in the 2nd century. Paul and other writers of the earliest existing proto-Christian documents did not believe in Jesus as a person who was incarnated on Earth in a historical setting; rather, they believed in Jesus as a heavenly being who suffered his sacrificial death in the lower spheres of heaven, where he was crucified by demons and then was subsequently resurrected by God. This mythological Jesus was not based on a historical Jesus, but rather on an exegesis of the Old Testament in the context of Jewish-Hellenistic religious syncretism, and what the early authors believed to be mystical visions of a risen Jesus.

According to Doherty, the nucleus of the "historical Jesus" of the Gospels can be found in the Jesus-movement which wrote the Q source. According to Doherty the Q-authors may have regarded themselves as "spokespersons for the Wisdom of God," with Jesus being the embodiment of this Wisdom, who was added in the latest phase of the development of Q. Q then started to take the form of a "foundation document," in response to a concurring sect who saw John the Baptist as its founder. Eventually, Q's Jesus and Paul's Christ were combined in the Gospel of Mark by a predominantly gentile community. In time, the gospel-narrative of this embodiment of Wisdom became interpreted as the literal history of the life of Jesus.

Robert M. Price

American New Testament scholar Robert M. Price.

American New Testament scholar and former Baptist pastor Robert McNair Price (b.1954) was a fellow of the Jesus Seminar, a group of writers and scholars who study the historicity of Jesus and who argue that the Christian image of Christ is a theological construct into which traces of Jesus of Nazareth have been woven. He was also a member of the Jesus Project.

Price believes that Christianity is a historicized synthesis of mainly Egyptian, Jewish, and Greek mythologies. Price maintains that there are three key points for the traditional Christ myth theory:

• There is no mention of a miracle-working Jesus in secular sources.
• The epistles, written earlier than the gospels, provide no evidence of a recent historical Jesus; all that can be taken from the epistles, Price argues, is that a Jesus Christ, son of God, lived in a heavenly realm, there died as a sacrifice for human sin, was raised by God and enthroned in heaven.
• The Jesus narrative is paralleled in Middle Eastern myths about dying and rising gods; Price names Baal, Osiris, Attis, Adonis, and Dumuzi/Tammuz as examples, all of which, he writes, survived into the Hellenistic and Roman periods and thereby influenced early Christianity. Price alleges that Christian apologists have tried to minimize these parallels.

Price questioned the historicity of Jesus in a series of books, including Deconstructing Jesus (2000), The Incredible Shrinking Son of Man (2003), Jesus Is Dead (2007), and The Christ-Myth Theory and Its Problems (2012), as well as in contributions to The Historical Jesus: Five Views (2009), in which he acknowledges that he stands against the majority view of scholars, but cautions against attempting to settle the issue by appeal to the majority.

In Deconstructing Jesus Price points out that "the Jesus Christ of the New Testament is a composite figure," out of which a broad variety of historical Jesuses can be reconstructed, any one of which may have been the real Jesus, but not all of them together. According to Price, various Jesus images flowed together at the origin of Christianity, some of them possibly based on myth, some of them possibly based on "a historical Jesus the Nazorean." Price admits uncertainty in this regard, writing in conclusion that "There may have been a real figure there, but there is simply no longer any way of being sure."

Citing accounts that have Jesus being crucified under Alexander Jannaeus (83 BCE) or in his 50s by Herod Agrippa I under the rule of Claudius Caesar (41–54 CE). Price argues that these "varying dates are the residue of various attempts to anchor an originally mythic or legendary Jesus in more or less recent history."

Thomas L. Thompson

Thomas L. Thompson (b.1939), Professor emeritus of theology at the University of Copenhagen, is a leading biblical minimalist of the Old Testament. In his 2007 book The Messiah Myth: The Near Eastern Roots of Jesus and David, Thompson argues that the biblical accounts of both King David and Jesus of Nazareth are mythical in nature and based on Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Babylonian, and Greek and Roman literature. For example, he argues that the resurrection of Jesus is taken directly from the story of the dying and rising god, Dionysus. Thompson however, does not draw a final conclusion on the historicity or ahistoricity of Jesus, but argued that any historical person would be very different from the Christ (or messiah) identified in the Gospel of Mark.

Thompson coedited the contributions from a diverse range of scholars in the 2012 book Is This Not the Carpenter?: The Question of the Historicity of the Figure of Jesus. Writing in the introduction, "The essays collected in this volume have a modest purpose. Neither establishing the historicity of a historical Jesus nor possessing an adequate warrant for dismissing it, our purpose is to clarify our engagement with critical historical and exegetical methods."

In a 2012 online article, Thompson defended his qualifications to address New Testament issues. He rejected the label of "mythicist", and reiterated his position that the issue of Jesus' existence cannot be determined one way or the other.

Thomas L. Brodie

In 2012, the Irish Dominican priest and theologian Thomas L. Brodie (b.1943,) holding a PhD from the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Rome and a co-founder and former director of the Dominican Biblical Institute in Limerick, published Beyond the Quest for the Historical Jesus: Memoir of a Discovery. In this book, Brodie, who previously had published academic works on the Hebrew prophets, argued that the gospels are essentially a rewriting of the stories of Elijah and Elisha when viewed as a unified account in the Books of Kings. This view lead Brodie to the conclusion that Jesus is mythical. Brodie's argument builds on his previous work, in which he stated that rather than being separate and fragmented, the stories of Elijah and Elisha are united and that 1 Kings 16:29–2 Kings 13:25 is a natural extension of 1 Kings 17–2 Kings 8 which have a coherence not generally observed by other biblical scholars. Brodie then views the Elijah–Elisha story as the underlying model for the gospel narratives.

In response to Brodie's publication of his view that Jesus was mythical, the Dominican order banned him from writing and lecturing, although he was allowed to stay on as a brother of the Irish Province, which continued to care for him. "There is an unjustifiable jump between methodology and conclusion" in Brodie's book, according to Gerard Norton, and "are not soundly based on scholarship." They are, according to Norton, "a memoir of a series of significant moments or events" in Brodie's life that reinforced "his core conviction" that neither Jesus nor Paul of Tarsus were historical.

Richard Carrier

American historian Richard Carrier.

Atheist activist Richard Carrier (b.1969) reviewed Earl Doherty's work on the origination of Jesus, and eventually concluded that the evidence actually favored the core Doherty thesis. According to Carrier, many studies by mainstream scholars have shown that the current consensus of a historical Jesus is based on invalid methods.

Carrier argues in his book On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt, that there is insufficient Bayesian probability, that is evidence, to believe in the existence of Jesus. Furthermore, he argues that the Jesus figure was probably originally known only through private revelations and hidden messages in scripture which were then crafted into a historical figure, to communicate the claims of the gospels allegorically. These allegories then started to be believed as fact during the struggle for control of the Christian churches of the first century. He argues that the probability of Jesus' existence is somewhere in the range from 1/3 to 1/12000 depending on the estimates used for the computation.

His methodology was reviewed by Aviezer Tucker, a prior advocate of using Bayesian techniques in history. Tucker expressed some sympathy for Carrier's view of the Gospels, stating: "The problem with the Synoptic Gospels as evidence for a historical Jesus from a Bayesian perspective is that the evidence that coheres does not seem to be independent, whereas the evidence that is independent does not seem to cohere." However, Tucker argued that historians have been able to use theories about the transmission and preservation of information to identify reliable parts of the Gospels. He said that "Carrier is too dismissive of such methods because he is focused on hypotheses about the historical Jesus rather than on the best explanations of the evidence."

Other modern proponents

British academic John M. Allegro

In his books The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross (1970) and The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Christian Myth (1979), the British archaeologist and philologist John M. Allegro advanced the theory that stories of early Christianity originated in a shamanistic Essene clandestine cult centered around the use of hallucinogenic mushrooms. He also argued that the story of Jesus was based on the crucifixion of the Teacher of Righteousness in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Allegro's theory was criticised sharply by Welsh historian Philip Jenkins who wrote that Allegro relied on texts that did not exist in quite the form he was citing them. Based on this and many other negative reactions to the book, Allegro's publisher later apologized for issuing the book and Allegro was forced to resign his academic post.

Canadian author Tom Harpur (photo by Hugh Wesley)

Influenced by Massey and Higgins, Alvin Boyd Kuhn (1880–1963) argued an Egyptian etymology to the Bible, that the gospels were symbolic rather than historic, and that church leaders started to misinterpret the New Testament in the third century. Author and ordained priest Tom Harpur dedicated his 2004 book The Pagan Christ to Kuhn, suggesting that Kuhn has not received the attention he deserves since many of his works were self-published. Building on Kuhn's work, Harpur listed similarities among the stories of Jesus, Horus, Mithras, Buddha and others. According to Harpur, in the second or third centuries, the early church created the fictional impression of a literal and historic Jesus and then used forgery and violence to cover up the evidence. Harpur's book received a great deal of criticism, including a response book, Unmasking the Pagan Christ: An Evangelical Response to the Cosmic Christ Idea. Fellow mythicist Robert M. Price also wrote a negative review, saying that he did not agree that the Egyptian parallels were as forceful as Harpur thought. Harpur published a sequel, Water Into Wine, in 2007.

In his 2017 book Décadence French writer and philosopher Michel Onfray argued for the Christ myth theory, Onfrey based his hypothesis on the fact that, other than in the New Testament, Jesus is barely mentioned in accounts of the period.

The Christ myth theory enjoyed brief popularity in the Soviet Union, where it was supported by Sergey Kovalev, Alexander Kazhdan, Abram Ranovich, Nikolai Rumyantsev, and Robert Vipper. Later, however, several scholars, including Kazhdan, retracted their views about mythical Jesus and by the end of the 1980s Iosif Kryvelev remained as virtually the only proponent of Christ myth theory in Soviet academia.

Scholarly reception

Main article: Historicity of Jesus

In modern scholarship, the Christ Myth Theory is a fringe theory, and finds virtually no support from scholars.

Existence of Jesus

See also: Sources for the historicity of Jesus

The Christ myth theory contradicts the mainstream historical view, which is that while the gospels include many mythical or legendary elements, these are religious elaborations added to the biography of a historical Jesus who did live in 1st-century Roman Palestine, who was baptized by John the Baptist and crucified by the order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate. The existence of Jesus and his crucifixion by the Romans is attested to by secular sources. Bart D. Ehrman states that Jesus "certainly existed, as virtually every competent scholar of antiquity, Christian or non-Christian, agrees," and that the existence of Jesus and his crucifixion by the Romans is attested to by a wide range of sources including Josephus and Tacitus. While scholars differ on the historicity of specific episodes described in the Biblical accounts of Jesus, the baptism and the crucifixion are two events in the life of Jesus which are subject to "almost universal assent." According to Alanna Nobbs,

While historical and theological debates remain about the actions and significance of this figure, his fame as a teacher, and his crucifixion under the Roman prefect Pontius Pilate, may be described as historically certain.

Josephus and Tacitus

There are three non-Christian sources which are typically used to study and establish the historicity of Jesus—two mentions in Josephus and one mention in the Roman source Tacitus. According to John Dominic Crossan,

That [Jesus] was crucified is as sure as anything historical can ever be, since both Josephus and Tacitus [...] agree with the Christian accounts on at least that basic fact.

Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews, written around 93–94 AD, includes two references to the biblical Jesus in Books 18 and 20. The general scholarly view is that while the longer passage, known as the Testimonium Flavianum, is most likely not authentic in its entirety, it is broadly agreed upon that it originally consisted of an authentic nucleus, which was then subject to Christian interpolation or forgery. Of the other mention in Josephus, Josephus scholar Louis H. Feldman has stated that "few have doubted the genuineness" of Josephus' reference to Jesus in Antiquities 20, 9, 1 and it is only disputed by a small number of scholars.

Roman historian Tacitus referred to 'Christus' and his execution by Pontius Pilate in his Annals (written c. AD 116), book 15, chapter 44. The very negative tone of Tacitus' comments on Christians make most experts believe that the passage is extremely unlikely to have been forged by a Christian scribe. The Tacitus reference is now widely accepted as an independent confirmation of Christ's crucifixion, although some scholars question the historical value of the passage on various grounds.

Nevertheless, it has been argued that "the only thing New Testament scholars seem to agree on is Jesus’ historical existence."

Lack of support for mythicism

According to New Testament scholar Bart D. Ehrman, most people who study the historical period of Jesus believe that he did exist, and do not write in support of the Christ myth theory.

Maurice Casey, theologian and scholar of New Testament and early Christianity, stated that the belief among professors that Jesus existed is generally completely certain. According to Casey, the view that Jesus did not exist is "the view of extremists" and "demonstrably false", and "professional scholars generally regard it as having been settled in serious scholarship long ago".

In his 1977 book Jesus: An Historian's Review of the Gospels, classical historian and popular author Michael Grant concluded that "modern critical methods fail to support the Christ-myth theory." In support of this, he quoted Roderic Dunkerley's 1957 opinion that the Christ-myth theory has "again and again been answered and annihilated by first-rank scholars." At the same time he also quoted Otto Betz's 1968 opinion that in recent years "no serious scholar has ventured to postulate the non-historicity of Jesus — or at any rate very few, and they have not succeeded in disposing of the much stronger, indeed very abundant, evidence to the contrary." In the same book, he also wrote:

If we apply to the New Testament, as we should, the same sort of criteria as we should apply to other ancient writings containing historical material, we can no more reject Jesus' existence than we can reject the existence of a mass of pagan personages whose reality as historical figures is never questioned.

Graeme Clarke, Emeritus Professor of Classical (Ancient) History and Archaeology at Australian National University has stated "Frankly, I know of no ancient historian or biblical historian who would have a twinge of doubt about the existence of a Jesus Christ - the documentary evidence is simply overwhelming."

R. Joseph Hoffmann, who had created the Jesus Project, which included both mythicists and historicists to investigate the historicity of Jesus, wrote that an adherent to the Christ myth theory asked to set up a separate section of the project for those committed to the theory. Hoffmann felt that to be committed to mythicism signaled a lack of necessary skepticism. He noted that most members of the project did not reach the mythicist conclusion.

Questioning the competence of proponents

Critics of the Christ myth theory question the competence of its supporters. According to Ehrman,

Few of these mythicists are actually scholars trained in ancient history, religion, biblical studies or any cognate field, let alone in the ancient languages generally thought to matter for those who want to say something with any degree of authority about a Jewish teacher who (allegedly) lived in first-century Palestine.

In a response, Thompson questioned the polemical nature of this qualification, pointing at his own academic standing and expertise. According to Thompson, Ehrman "has attributed to my book arguments and principles which I had never presented, certainly not that Jesus had never existed." Thompson questions Ehrman's qualifications in regard to Old Testamentical writings and research, and his competenece to recognize the problems involved in "reiterated narrative" and "the historicity of a literary figure," stating that Ehrman had "thoroughly [...] misunderstood [...] the very issue of the historicity of the New Testament figure of Jesus."

Maurice Casey has criticized the Mythicists, pointing out their complete ignorance of how modern critical scholarship actually works. He also criticizes Mythicists for their frequent assumption that all modern scholars of religion are Protestant fundamentalists of the American variety, insisting that this assumption is not only totally inaccurate, but also exemplary of the Mythicists' misconceptions about the ideas and attitudes of mainstream scholars.

Questioning the mainstream view appears to have consequences for one's job perspectives. According to Casey, Thompson's early work, which "successfully refuted the attempts of Albright and others to defend the historicity of the most ancient parts of biblical literature history," has "negatively affected his future job prospects." Ehrman also notes that "mythicist" views would prevent one from getting employment in a religious studies department:

These views are so extreme and so unconvincing to 99.99 percent of the real experts that anyone holding them is as likely to get a teaching job in an established department of religion as a six-day creationist is likely to land on in a bona fide department of biology.

Popular reception

According to Derek Murphy, the documentaries The God Who Wasn't There (2005) and Zeitgeist (2007) raised interest for the Christ myth theory with a larger audience, and gave the topic a large coverage on the internet. A 2015 survey by the Church of England suggests that 22 percent of people in England do not believe Jesus was a real person. According to Ehrman, mythicism has a growing appeal "because these deniers of Jesus are at the same time denouncers of religion."

Documentaries

Since 2005, several English-language documentaries have focused, at least in part, on the Christ myth theory:

• The God Who Wasn't There directed by Brian Flemming and featuring Richard Carrier and Robert M. Price (2005)
• The Pagan Christ produced by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and featuring Tom Harpur (2007)
• Zeitgeist: The Movie directed by Peter Joseph (2007)
• The Hidden Story of Jesus produced by Channel 4 and featuring Robert Beckford (2007)
• Religulous directed by Larry Charles and featuring Bill Maher (2008)
• Caesar's Messiah by Joseph Atwill (2013)

See also

Christian

• Bible conspiracy theory
• Christian mythology
• Christology
• Criticism of the Bible
• Criticism of Christianity
• Criticism of Jesus
• Gnosticism
• Historical background of the New Testament
• Historical reliability of the Gospels
• Historicity of the Bible
• Josephus on Jesus
• List of messiah claimants
• Origins of Christianity
• Quest for the historical Jesus
• Sources for the historicity of Jesus
• Tacitus on Christ

Non-Christian

• Myth of Er (Plato)
• Zen Narratives
• Flower Sermon

Sources

• Allegro, John M. The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross. Hodder & Stoughton, 1970.
• Allegro, John M. The Dead Sea Scrolls & the Christian Myth. Prometheus 1992, first published 1979.
• Avalos, Hector. The End of Biblical Studies. Prometheus, 2007.
• Arvidsson, Stefan. Aryan Idols: Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science. University of Chicago Press, 2006.
• Bader, Christopher, et al. American Piety in the 21st Century. Baylor Institute for Studies of Religion, 2006.
• Barker, Dan. Godless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists. Ulysses, 2008.
• Barnett, Paul. Jesus and the Logic of History. InterVarsity, 2001.
• Barnett, Paul. Messiah Jesus – the evidence of history. InterVarsity, 2009.
• Barrett, David V. "The Gospel According to Bart", Fortean Times issue 221, 2007.
• Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses. Eerdmans, 2006.
• Beilby, James K. and Eddy, Paul Rhodes. "The Quest for the Historical Jesus," in James K. Beilby and Paul Rhodes Eddy (eds.). The Historical Jesus: Five Views. Intervarsity, 2009.
• Bennett, Clinton. In Search of Jesus: Insider and Outsider Images. Continuum, 2001.
• Berdyaev, Nikolai. "The Scientific Discipline of Religion and Christian Apologetics," Put, volume 6, 1927.
• Bevan, Edwyn R. The History of Christianity in the Light of Modern Knowledge. Blackie & Son, 1929.
• Bevan, Edwyn R. Hellenism And Christianity. G. Allen & Unwin, 1930.
• Blomberg, Craig L. "Gospels (Historical Reliability)" in Joel B. Green, Scot McKnight, & I. Howard Marshall (eds.) Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels. InterVarsity, 1992.
• Bolland, G. J. P. J. De Evangelische Jozua, 1907.
• Bornkamm, Günther. Jesus of Nazareth. Fortress, 1995, first published 1959.
• Brandon, S. G. F. "The Ritual Perpetuation of the Past", Numen, volume 6, issue 1, 1959.
• Breen, Tom. The Messiah Formerly Known as Jesus. Baylor University Press, 2008.
• Bromiley, Geoffrey W. (ed.) "Jesus Christ," The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia. Eerdmans, 1982.
• Bruce, F. F. Paul and Jesus SPCK, 1977.
• Brunner, Emil. The Mediator: A Study of the Central Doctrine of the Christian Faith. Lutterworth, 2002, first published 1934.
• Burkert, Walter. Ancient Mystery Cults. Harvard University Press, 1989.
• Cadbury, Henry J. The Eclipse of the Historical Jesus. Pendle Hill, 1964.
• Bushby, Tony, The Bible Fraud, The Pacific Group, 2001.
• Case, Shirley Jackson. "The Historicity of Jesus: An Estimate of the Negative Argument", The American Journal of Theology, volume 15, issue 1, 1911.
• Casey, Maurice, Jesus: Evidence and Argument or Mythicist Myths?, Bloomsbury T&T Clark, 2014.
• Centre for Public Christianity. "New survey finds over half of Australians think Jesus rose from the dead", 2009, Retrieved 2010-08-04.
• Charlesworth, James H. Jesus and Archaeology. Erdmans, 2006.
• Communication Research. Theos: Easter Survey, February 2008, Retrieved 2010-08-03.
• Conybeare, Frederick Cornwallis. "The Historical Christ, or, An investigation of the views of Mr. J.M. Robertson, Dr. A. Drews, and Prof. W.B. Smith", Watts & Co, 1914.
• Costa, Tony. "Review of Jesus is Dead", Review of Biblical Literature, 2009.
• Cutner, Herbert Jesus—God, Man or Myth : An Examination of the Evidence. Book Tree, 2000, first published 1950.
• Dawkins, Richard. The God Delusion. Houghton Mifflin, 2006.
• Dickson, John. Jesus: A Short Life. Lion Hudson, 2008.
• Dickson, John. "Facts and friction of Easter", The Sydney Morning Herald, March 21, 2008.
• Doherty, Earl (1995a), The Jesus Puzzle. Main Articles: Preamble
• Doherty, Earl (1995c), The Jesus Puzzle. Main Articles: Part Two: Who was Christ Jesus?
• Doherty, Earl (1995d), The Jesus Puzzle. Main Articles: Part Three: The Evolution of Jesus of Nazareth
• Doherty, Earl (1997), "The Jesus Puzzle: Pieces in a Puzzle of Christian Origins", Journal of Higher Criticism, 4 (2)
• Doherty, Earl (2009), Jesus: Neither God Nor Man - The Case for a Mythical Jesus, Age of Reason Publications, ISBN 978-0-9689259-2-8
• Drews, Arthur. Die Christusmythe. Eugen Diederichs, 1910, published in English as The Christ Myth, Prometheus, 1910.
• Dunn, James D. G. "Myth" in Joel B. Green, Scot McKnight, & I. Howard Marshall (ed.) Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels. InterVarsity, 1992.
• Dunn, James D. G. The Christ and the Spirit. Eerdmans, 1998.
• Dunn, James D. G. Jesus Remembered. Eerdmans, 2003.
• Dunn, James D. G. "Response to Robert M. Price" in James K. Beilby & Paul Rhodes Eddy. The Historical Jesus: Five Views. InterVarsity, 2009.
• Dunn, James D. G. "Response to Robert M. Price" in James K. Beilby & Paul Rhodes Eddy. The Historical Jesus: Five Views. InterVarsity, 2009.
• Dupuis, Charles François. The Origin of All Religious Worship. Kessinger, 2007, first published 1794.
• Durant, Will. Christ and Caesar. Simon & Schuster, 1972.
• Eddy, Paul R. and Boyd, Gregory A. The Jesus Legend. Baker Academic, 2007.
• Ehrman, Bart. Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why. 2007.
• Ehrman, Bart. Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them). 2010.
• Ehrman, Bart (2012), Did Jesus Exist? The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth, HarperOne
• Engels, Friedrich. "Bruno Bauer and Early Christianity", Der Sozialdemokrat, May 1882.
• Evans, Craig A. "Life-of-Jesus Research and the Eclipse of Mythology", Theological Studies, volume 54, 1993.
• Evans, Craig A. Fabricating Jesus. InterVarsity, 2008, p. 220–221.
• Evans, Henry Ridgely. The Napoleon Myth. Open Court, 1995.
• Feldman, Louis H. "Josephus" in David Noel Freedman (ed.) Anchor Bible Dictionary. Doubleday, 1992.
• Fiensy, David A. New Testament Introduction. College Press, 1995.
• Forbes, Chris. "Zeitgeist: Time to Discard the Christian Story?", Center for Public Christianity, 2009, Retrieved 2010-08-04.
• Forsyth, P. T. The Person and Place of Jesus Christ Wipf & Stock, 1996.
• Frazer, James. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. Macmillan, 1919.
• France, R. T. The Evidence for Jesus. InterVarsity, 1986.
• Fredriksen, Paula. From Jesus to Christ. Yale University Press, 2000.
• Freke, Timothy; Gandy, Peter (1999). The Jesus Mysteries. Thorsons. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Gerrish, Brian A. "Jesus, Myth, and History: Troeltsch's Stand in the 'Christ-Myth' Debate", The Journal of Religion, volume 55, issue 1, 1975.
• Goguel, Maurice. Jesus the Nazarene: Myth or History?. T. Fisher Unwin, 1926.
• Goguel, Maurice. "Recent French Discussion of the Historical Existence of Jesus Christ," Harvard Theological Review, volume 19, issue 2, 1926, pp. 115–142.
• Graham, Lloyd M., Deceptions and Myths of the Bible, Citadel Press, 1975.
• Grant, Michael. Jesus: An Historian's Review of the Gospels. Scribner, 1995; first published 1977.
• Haber, Edyth C. "The Mythic Bulgakov: 'The Master and Margarita' and Arthur Drews's 'The Christ Myth'", Slavic & East European Journal, volume 43, issue 2, 1999.

Habermas, Gary; Licona, Michael (2004). The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus. Kregel Publications. ISBN 9780825494109. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

• Harris, Sam. The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason. W. W. Norton, 2005.
• Harris, Sam. Letter to a Christian Nation: A Challenge to Faith. Bantam, 2007.
• Henry, Carl F.H. God, Revelation, and Authority. Crossway, 1999.
• Hitchens, Christopher. God Is Not Great. Twelve Books, 2007.
• Hoffmann, R. Joseph. "Maurice Goguel and the 'Myth Theory' of Christian Origins" in Maurice Goguel. Jesus the Nazarene: Myth or History? Prometheus, 2006.
• Horbury, William. "The New Testament" in Ernest Nicholson (ed.) A century of Theological and Religious Studies in Britain. Oxford University Press, 2003.
• Jacoby, Douglas A. Compelling Evidence For God and the Bible. Harvest House Publishers, 2010.
• Johnson, Edwin. The Antiqua mater: A Study of Christian Origins. Trübner, 1887.
• Kratz, Peter. The Whole Rosenberg Story Again? Berliner Institut für Faschismus-Forschung und Antifaschistische Aktion, 1999.
• Klausner, Joseph. Jesus of Nazareth. Bloch, 1989; first published 1925.
• Köstenberger, Andreas J. Encountering John. Baker Academic, 1999.
• Langenbach, Christian G. "Freireligiöse und Nationalsozialismus", | Humanismus Aktuell, volume 20, 2007.
• Le Beau, Bryan F. The Atheist: Madalyn Murray O'Hair. New York University Press, 2005.
• Machen, John Gresham. "History and Faith", The Princeton Theological Review, volume 13, issue 3, 1915.
• Macquarrie, John. The Scope of Demythologizing: Bultmann and His Critics. SCM, 1960.
• Mangasarian, Mangasar Magurditch The Truth About Jesus — Is He a Myth? Chicago: Independent Religious Society, 1909.
• Mangasarian, Mangasar Magurditch The Bible Unveiled. Chicago: Independent Religious Society [Rationalist], 1911.
• Marshall, Ian Howard. I Believe in the Historical Jesus. Regent College Publishing, 2004.
• Martin, Michael. The Case Against Christianity. Temple University Press, 1993.
• McClymond, Michael James. Familiar Stranger. Eerdmans, 2004.
• Mettinger, Tryggve N. D. The Riddle of Resurrection. Almqvist & Wiksell, 2001.
• Metzger, Bruce M. "Book review of Rim i rannee Khristianstvo by R. Yu. Vipper". Journal of Biblical Literature, volume 75, issue 3, 1956.
• Metzger, Bruce M. Historical and Literary Studies, Pagan, Jewish, and Christian. Brill 1968.
• Meynell, Hugo A. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Bernard Lonergan. University of Toronto Press, 1991.
• Miller, Lisa and Scelfo, Julie. "Who Was Jesus? Pope Benedict's Answer", Newsweek, May 21, 2007.
• Moggach, Douglas. The Philosophy and Politics of Bruno Bauer. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
• Murphy, Derek (2011), Jesus Potter Harry Christ (PDF), holyblasphemy press
• Nikiforov, Vladimir. "Russian Christianity" in Leslie Houlden (ed.) Jesus in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO, 2003.
• Norman, Asher, Twenty Six Reasons Why Jews Don't Believe in Jesus, Black, White, and Read Publishing, 2007.
• O'Dwyer, Davin. "Zeitgeist: The Nonsense", The Irish Times, August 25, 2007.
• O'Neil, Tom. "Expect 'Religulous' and Bill Maher to Raise Oscars Hell", The Los Angeles Times, August 20, 2008.
• Pérès, Jean-Baptiste. "Grand Erratum: The Non-Existence of Napoleon Proved" in Henry Ridgely Evans. The Napoleon Myth. Open Court, 1827.
• Peris, Daniel. Storming the Heavens. Cornell University Press, 1998.
• Perrin, Nicholas. Lost in Transmission?. Thomas Nelson, 2007.
• Pfleiderer, Otto. The Development of Theology in Germany Since Kant and Its Progress in Great Britain Since 1825. Swan Soennenschein, 1893.
• Porter, Stanley E. and Bedard, Stephen J. Unmasking the Pagan Christ. Clements, 2006.
• Powell, Mark Allan (1998). Jesus as a Figure in History. Westminster John Knox. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Price, Robert M. "Of Myth and Men", Free Inquiry magazine, Volume 20, Number 1, Retrieved 2010-08-04.
• Price, Robert M. and Craig, William Lane. "The Craig-Price Debate: Did Jesus Rise From the Dead?", at Ohio State University, The Veritas Forum, 1999.
• Price, Robert M. Deconstructing Jesus. Prometheus, 2000.
• Price, Robert M. (2003). Incredible Shrinking Son of Man: How Reliable Is the Gospel Tradition?. Prometheus Books, Publishers. ISBN 978-1-61592-028-0. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Price, Robert M. "Jesus at the Vanishing Point" in James K. Beilby & Paul Rhodes Eddy (eds.) The Historical Jesus: Five Views. InterVarsity, 2009.
• Price, Robert M. "Book review of "Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection", 2009, Retrieved 2010-08-04.
• Price, Robert M. (2011). The Christ-Myth Theory and Its Problems. American Atheist Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Puskas, Charles B. and Crump, David. An Introduction to the Gospels and Acts. Eerdmans, 2008.
• Richards, George W. Beyond Fundamentalism and Modernism. Scribner, 1934.
• Robertson, John M. A Short History of Christianity. Watts, 1902.
• Robertson, John M. Pagan Christs. Watts, 1903.
• Russell, Bertrand. Why I Am Not a Christian and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects. Touchstone, 1967.
• Schweitzer, Albert (2001) [1913]. The Quest of the Historical Jesus. Fortress. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Segal, Alan F. "Jesus and the Gospel—What Really Happened?", Slate, December 21, 2005.
• Sloyan, Gerard Stephen. The Crucifixion of Jesus: History, Myth, Faith. Fortress, 1995.
• Smith, Mark S. The Ugaritic Baal Cycle. Brill, 1994.
• Solmsen, Friedrich. "George A. Wells on Christmas in Early New Testament Criticism", Journal of the History of Ideas, volume 31, issue 2, 1970.
• Soukup, Elise "Imaginary Friend?", Newsweek, June 26, 2005.
• Stanton, Graham (2002). The Gospels and Jesus. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780191501029. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Stark, Rodney. Discovering God. HarperOne, 2007.
• Stark, Rodney. What Americans Really Believe. Baylor University Press, 2008.
• Stenger, Victor J. God: The Failed Hypothesis. Prometheus, 2007.
• Thompson, Thomas L. The Messiah Myth: The Near Eastern Roots of Jesus and David. Basic Books, 2005.
• Thompson, Thomas L.; Verenna, Thomas S., eds. (2012), "Is this Not the Carpenter?": The Question of the Historicity of the Figure of Jesus, Equinox, ISBN 978-1-84553-986-3
• Taylor, Robert Syntagma of the Evidences of the Christian Religion. Richard Carlile, 1828.
• Taylor, Robert The Diegesis; Being a Discovery of the Origin, Evidences, and Early History of Christianity. Richard Carlile, 1829.
• The New York Times. "Abolition of History", May 14, 1904.
• The New York Times. "Jesus Never Lived, Asserts Prof. Drews", February 6, 1910.
• Theissen, Gerd; Merz, Annette (1998). The historical Jesus: a comprehensive guide. Minneapolis: Fortress Press. ISBN 978-0-8006-3122-2. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Thrower, James. Marxist-Leninist "Scientific Atheism" and the Study of Religion and Atheism. Walter de Gruyter, 1983.
• Ulansey, David. The Origins of the Mithraic Mysteries. Oxford University Press, 1991.
• Voorst, Robert E. Van (2000). Jesus Outside the New Testament. Eerdmans. ISBN 9780802843685. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Voorst, Robert E. Van (2003). "Nonexistence Hypothesis". In Holden, James Leslie (ed.). Jesus in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia, Vol. 2: K-Z. ABC-CLIO. pp. 658–660. {{cite encyclopedia}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
• Volney, Constantin-François. The Ruins, or, Meditation on the Revolutions of Empires and the Law of Nature, Davis, 1796.[
• Waite, Charles B., History of the Christian Religion to the Year Two Hundred. Kessinger, 2003.
• Walsh, George. The Role of Religion in History. Transaction, 1998.
• Warfield, Benjamin B. "Book review of The Witnesses to the Historicity of Jesus by Arthur Drews"], The Princeton Theological Review, volume 11, issue 2, 1913. |
• Weaver, Walter P. (1999). The Historical Jesus in the Twentieth Century, 1900–1950. Trinity. ISBN 9781563382802. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

Wells, G. A. (1969). "Stages of New Testament Criticism". Journal of the History of Ideas. 30 (2). JSTOR 2708429. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

• Wells, G. A. (1971). The Jesus of the Early Christians. Pemberton. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Wells, G. A. (1975). Did Jesus Exist?. Prometheus. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Wells, G. A. (1982). The Historical Evidence for Jesus. Prometheus. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Wells, G. A. Who Was Jesus? A Critique of the New Testament Record. Open Court, 1989
• Wells, G. A. The Jesus Legend. Open Court, 1996.
• Wells, G. A. (1999), The Jesus Myth, Open Court
• Wells, G.A. (2004). Can We Trust the New Testament?: Thoughts on the Reliability of Early Christian Testimony. Open Court. ISBN 9780812695670. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Wells, G. A. "Jesus, Historicity of." in The New Encyclopedia of Unbelief, ed. T. Flynn. Prometheus, 2007.
• Wells, G. A. "A Reply to J. P. Holding's 'Shattering' of My Views on Jesus and an Examination of the Early Pagan and Jewish References to Jesus", The Secular Web, 2000, Retrieved 2010-08-03.
• Wells, G. A. (2009). Cutting Jesus Down to Size: What Higher Criticism Has Achieved and Where It Leaves Christianity. Open Court. ISBN 978-0-8126-9656-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
• Whately, Richard. Historic Doubts Relative to Napoleon Buonaparte, Warren F. Draper, 1874; first published 1819.
• Wheless, Joseph. Forgery In Christianity. Knopf, 1930.
• White, L. Michael. From Jesus to Christianity. HarperCollins, 2004.
• Wood, Herbert George. Christianity and the Nature of History. Cambridge University Press, 1934.
• Wright, N. T. "Jesus' Self Understanding," in Davies, Stephen T. et al. The Incarnation. Oxford University Press, 2004.
• Yamauchi, Edwin M. "Easter: Myth, Hallucination, or History?", Christianity Today, March 15 and 29, 1974.
• Zwartz, Barney. "Australians not so sceptical about Jesus, survey finds", The Age, April 7, 2009.

Further reading

Proponents

• George Albert Wells (1975), Did Jesus Exist?
• Earl Doherty (1999), The Jesus Puzzle; republished (2009) as Jesus: Neither God nor Man—The Case for a Mythical Jesus; online versions
• Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy (1999), The Jesus Mysteries: Was the "Original Jesus" a Pagan God?
• Robert M. Price (2003), The Incredible Shrinking Son of Man
• Robert M. Price (2012), The Christ-Myth Theory and Its Problems
• David Fitzgerald (2010), Nailed: 10 Christian Myths That Show Jesus Never Existed At All
• Thompson, Thomas L.; Verenna, Thomas S., eds. (2012), "Is this Not the Carpenter?": The Question of the Historicity of the Figure of Jesus, Equinox, ISBN 978-1-84553-986-3
• Richard Carrier (2014), On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt
• Raphael Lataster (2015), Jesus Did Not Exist. A Debate Among Atheists

Critics

• James Patrick Holding (2008), Shattering the Christ Myth. Did Jesus Not Exist?
• Ehrman, Bart (2012), Did Jesus Exist? The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth, HarperCollins, USA, ISBN 978-0-06-220460-8
• Maurice Casey (2014), Jesus: Evidence and Argument Or Mythicist Myths?

External links

• Religious Tolerance General outline of range of views on Jesus from classical Christian to Jesus a mere man and Jesus entirely mythical
• Vridar, WHO’s WHO: Mythicists and Mythicist Agnostics
• Demolishing the historicity of Jesus – A History List of Contemporary and Early proponents of Christ Myth Theory.