Neo-libertarianism: Difference between revisions
Omnipaedista (talk | contribs) grammar fix |
add more recent sources |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Overview == |
== Overview == |
||
Neo-libertarianism has its roots at least as far back as 1980 when it was first described by James Sterba of the [[University of Notre Dame]]. Sterba observed that libertarianism advocates for a government that does no more than protection against force, fraud, theft, enforcement of contracts, and other "[[negative liberties]]," |
Neo-libertarianism has its roots at least as far back as 1980 when it was first described by James Sterba of the [[University of Notre Dame]]. Sterba observed that libertarianism advocates for a government that does no more than protection against force, fraud, theft, enforcement of contracts, and other "[[negative liberties]]," as contrasted with "positive liberties" by [[Isaiah Berlin]] <ref>{{cite web |title=Positive and Negative Liberty |url=https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberty-positive-negative/ |website=plato.stanford.edu |accessdate=12 October 2018}}</ref>. He contrasted this with the older libertarian ideal of a "[[night watchman state]]," or "[[minarchism]]." Sterba held that it is "obviously impossible for everyone in society to be guaranteed complete liberty as defined by this ideal: after all, people's actual wants as well as their conceivable wants can come into serious conflict. ... it is also impossible for everyone in society to be completely free from the interference of other persons."<ref>James Sterba, ''Justice: Alternative Political Perspectives'', Wadsworth, Inc., 1980, p. 175 {{ISBN|0-534-00762-7}}.</ref> In 2013, he wrote, "I shall show that moral commitment to an ideal of "negative" liberty, which does not lead to a night-watchman state, but instead requires sufficient government to provide each person in society with the relatively high minimum of liberty that persons using [[John Rawls|Rawls]]' [[Original position|decision procedure]] would select. The political program actually justified by an ideal of negative liberty I shall call ''Neo-Libertarianism''."<ref>James Sterba, ''The Pursuit of Justice'', Rowman & Littlefield, 2013, p. 52.</ref></blockquote> |
||
===Modern incarnations=== |
|||
The concept of neo-libertarianism gained a small following in the mid-2000s <ref name=reason>{{cite web |authorlink=Charles Paul Freund |first=Charles Paul |last=Freund |title=You Know You're Neolibertarian If... |work=Reason |date=April 2005 |url=http://reason.com/blog/2005/04/01/you-know-youre-neolibertarian |accessdate=12 October 2018}}</ref> among commentators who distinguished themselves from neoconservatives by their support for [[Individual and group rights|individual liberties]]<ref>{{cite web |authorlink=Dale Franks |first=Dale |last=Franks |title=Bryan Pick's Suggestions for the GOP |work=QandO |date=November 2012 |url=http://www.qando.net/2012/11/10/bryan-picks-suggestions-for-the-gop/ |accessdate=12 October 2018}}</ref> and from libertarians by their support for [[Interventionism (politics)|interventionism]]<ref name=reason/>. |
|||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
Revision as of 20:24, 12 October 2018
 | The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. (September 2015) |
| This article is part of a series on |
| Libertarianism in the United States |
|---|
 |
Neo-libertarianism is a political and social philosophy that is a combination of libertarian principles with modern liberal principles.
Overview
Neo-libertarianism has its roots at least as far back as 1980 when it was first described by James Sterba of the University of Notre Dame. Sterba observed that libertarianism advocates for a government that does no more than protection against force, fraud, theft, enforcement of contracts, and other "negative liberties," as contrasted with "positive liberties" by Isaiah Berlin [1]. He contrasted this with the older libertarian ideal of a "night watchman state," or "minarchism." Sterba held that it is "obviously impossible for everyone in society to be guaranteed complete liberty as defined by this ideal: after all, people's actual wants as well as their conceivable wants can come into serious conflict. ... it is also impossible for everyone in society to be completely free from the interference of other persons."[2] In 2013, he wrote, "I shall show that moral commitment to an ideal of "negative" liberty, which does not lead to a night-watchman state, but instead requires sufficient government to provide each person in society with the relatively high minimum of liberty that persons using Rawls' decision procedure would select. The political program actually justified by an ideal of negative liberty I shall call Neo-Libertarianism."[3]
Modern incarnations
The concept of neo-libertarianism gained a small following in the mid-2000s [4] among commentators who distinguished themselves from neoconservatives by their support for individual liberties[5] and from libertarians by their support for interventionism[4].
See also
- Beltway libertarianism
- Bleeding-heart libertarianism
- Fusionism
- Left-libertarianism
- Neoliberalism
- Paleolibertarianism
References
- ^ "Positive and Negative Liberty". plato.stanford.edu. Retrieved 12 October 2018.
- ^ James Sterba, Justice: Alternative Political Perspectives, Wadsworth, Inc., 1980, p. 175 ISBN 0-534-00762-7.
- ^ James Sterba, The Pursuit of Justice, Rowman & Littlefield, 2013, p. 52.
- ^ a b Freund, Charles Paul (April 2005). "You Know You're Neolibertarian If..." Reason. Retrieved 12 October 2018.
- ^ Franks, Dale (November 2012). "Bryan Pick's Suggestions for the GOP". QandO. Retrieved 12 October 2018.
