Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 05:29 on 30 June 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

Bot-reported

• Rj Satwinder Singh Rajpal (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:07, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• Pixelninja2000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – clearly WP:NOTHERE 2700/2800 edits are bad page moves and all to their sandbox in violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST. Praxidicae (talk) 16:30, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. -- ferret (talk) 16:33, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

• 2A00:23C6:ED81:4900:9573:E847:C294:73D9 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) constant reverts and changes with intent to discredit Max Lu. Warnings given concerning WP:NPA but to no avail. Seems like some people are holding grudges against the vice chancellor. Asking administrator to revert article back to original version dated [ 07:19, 20 June 2019‎ ] and impose protection on the page, i.e., temporarily disable any edits for 6 months. 2405:800:9030:2C47:4099:1E25:C4CA:9695 (talk) 16:43, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Not seeing anything, and user has no warnings on talk page. -- ferret (talk) 16:50, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

@Ferret: Did you check the talk page of Max Lu and also its edit history? It is clear to me they are trying to blow up the controversy information. But this article is about the person, not about the university of surrey controversy. They are spamming the page with controversy content which I felt should be in a separate article. 2405:800:9030:2C47:4099:1E25:C4CA:9695 (talk) 16:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)