Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Grsjst (talk | contribs) at 19:37, 20 November 2011 (→CHORUS+: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as CSD G6), or in articles for deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

wyandotte art fair

significance -Jimbob1122 (talk) 23:52, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This event was deleted due to promotion. this page was not put on wikipedia for any promotional purpose. It is significant to the area of detroit and southeast michigan, due to the fact that it is the largest art fair of its kind in the area and is 51 years old. Many communities really this site for information for many subjects and events. so we think this would be a great spot to put information on the fair here about the history and what types art is celebrated here.

Thank you for your consideration,

James Roberts

 Not done The article was deleted because it had two edits: one was to create it, the second was by the same person who then completely blanked it. The article itself was unreferenced (other than its own website, which does not count), showed not signs of notability ... in other words, did not meet Wikipedia requirements. If you wish to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT of something that might pass our requirements for en encylopedia article, then please feel free to try (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:04, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


And if Jimbob is referring to Wyandotte art fair · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions], that article was deleted as blatant spam. On reviewing the deleted text, it is also a copyright violation, so it will not be restored. —C.Fred (talk) 03:18, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pyromania.ogg, File:DiaryOfAnUnbornChild.ogg

Can I have my amusing little files back please for my own personal enjoyemnt? Willothewisp (talk) 11:34, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

capital cup national undergraduate mooting tournament

This event is completely non-profit and is notable because it is among the first of its kind in Canada since it's not for professional law students. The article isn't "advertising" anything... it's informative and is meant as a reference point for people interested in mooting in general. It has also been reviewed by two other users who've helped with adding links etc. to make it fit Wikipedia's standards. -EricOntario (talk) 08:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The author of this article has clearly a conflict of interest in this, seeing his personal attack on User talk:Night of the Big Wind#Capital Cup Speedy Deletion [redacted link to linkedin page]. Secondly, the tournament had only one edition yet. Thirdly, the tournament has only 68 hits on internet (was 107), including fora, the own website, facebook, linkedin and twitter. And 0 (zero) hits on Google News. Completely not notable and worth the speedy deletion for being an advertisement. Night of the Big Wind talk 09:14, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign reformation movement

The page was deleted for not stating it's importance WHEN The page actually stated its importance as being a page on a group that has a heavy influence in the Occupy Detroit Movement. Even when another and I contested the deletion stating it's importance, the page was still deleted. It made me susceptible that no one had actually read the page or the talk page. I understand if the page were put up for speedy deletion just to see if Those that have put effort into creating it would defend it, but we were deleted for an invalid purpose. Please put the page back up so society can understand the group's goals and intentions. -Mudeater101 (talk) 19:36, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia isn't a soapbox for you to announce your great cause. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to preach out as if Wikipedia were a "soapbox", I posted the page so people could understand the group. If you suspect it to be written in a biased way, then suggest where I should edit the page, not automatically delete the page. Mudeater101 (talk) 06:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Addante

This page was deleted without discussion and the user (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pastor_Theo) who deleted it's account has been blocked (reason: This account is a sock puppet of Ecoleetage and has been blocked indefinitely.) Frank Addante is a well-known blogger (www.FounderBlog.com), inventor of early Internet and advertising technologies, patent holder, prominent figure/speaker/thought leader in online advertising technology, E&Y Entrepreneur of the Year and a case study written by Harvard is now part of the Harvard Business School's standard curriculum (http://hbr.org/product/frank-addante-serial-entrepreneur/an/809046-PDF-ENG) and is regularly quoted in publications such as Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Forbes, etc.}} This page was deleted without discussion and the user (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pastor_Theo) who deleted it's account has been blocked (reason: This account is a sock puppet of Ecoleetage and has been blocked indefinitely.)

Frank Addante is a well-known blogger (www.FounderBlog.com), inventor of early Internet and advertising technologies, patent holder, prominent figure/speaker/thought leader in online advertising technology, E&Y Entrepreneur of the Year and a case study written by Harvard is now part of the Harvard Business School's standard curriculum (http://hbr.org/product/frank-addante-serial-entrepreneur/an/809046-PDF-ENG) and is regularly quoted in publications such as Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Forbes, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.254.42.158 (talk • contribs)

  •  Not done The current status of the deleting admin means zero in the case of deletions. First, this deletion occurred more than 2 years ago. Second, the article was horrifically self-promotional. A registered user would be fine creating a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, trying to meet Wikipedia requirements, but they should have it reviewed before making it a live article. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:11, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ricky Little

He played for Partick Thistle in the First Division, and is captain of Scotland's oldest club - http://www.ptfc.co.uk/team/ricky_little -Salty1984 (talk) 02:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Pablo Camacho

The article was deleted on February with the reason "Expired PROD, concern was: Is being the first person of a given nationality to be born in the Antarctic notable?", I not only feel that the subject is notable, but also reason given did not cite any guidelines or supply a proper excuse, I feel I could improve the article and expand upon it if it could be moved into my userspace for reconstruction, I have potential references, User:Phoenix B 1of3/Juan Pablo Camacho would be my preferred location. -– Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 02:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie Fontana

We can substatiate ALL information in the Melanie Fontana biography that was WRONGLY removed for "unsighted" sources??

Please repost. Questions? Write (Redacted)

Melanie Fontana management 70.188.174.198 (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed Request - please use {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request).. To top it off there are two concerns that must be addresses: #1) conflict of interest...and #2) the biographies of living persons requires valid, third part references for any biography of a living person, and none of the references in the article met that requirement. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:54, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bay Windows

Please userfy this page so that I can determine whether it may be improved sufficiently to be reinstated, thanks. -AV3000 (talk) 14:04, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:AV3000/Bay Windows. Salvio Let's talk about it! 18:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:English Roman Catholic Religious Sisters

This was deleted after some discussion, but it followed a discussion which focused only on the English, of which so far there was only one entry. The categorization of that article is now incorrect, and was based on "general knowledge". Would any other field accept such reasoning? Additionally, there are other national categorizations of Religious Sisters by nationality. Are the English to be the gap in this representation? Daniel the Monk (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: The existence or absence of Article X CAN NOT justify Article Y. Also, note that REFUND will not override the consensus of a deletion discussion; you need to go to WP:Deletion review instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 20:23, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scenario testing

CopyVio is backward. As an editor of the page over several revisions I can guarantee that http://www.testinginterviewquestions.com/interview/10052/ copied the page and not the other way around. Look at the edit history. The external website added it 7/31/2006. -Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:34, 13 November 2011 (UTC

Done You're right about the time stamps but the tag also mentioned "Software Testing: Principles and Practice" page 118. Restored so any doubts can be sorted out.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:index.jpeg

reasoning -Mjh1998 (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 20:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not done Has still no licensing info and is now redundant to File:Wokinghighschool.jpg on Commons with OTRS pending, so deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:01, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maria, Hapsbourg (1965- )

Please undelete this article, and/or send me a copy for my notes. This is a bio of a private person who is a descendant of the Louis line of France and the Hapsbourg, and the title falls to her. If nothing else, I would like a copy of the posting; I didn't print it out. I will deal with this somewhere else. Thanks -24.67.147.67 (talk) 23:01, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 03:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It was Maria, Hapsbourg (1965- ), deleted as result of AFD. Peter E. James (talk) 03:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, still not quite; the deleted article includes the title. In any case, Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 04:07, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pat Pedraza

Please undelete as the information is all still current and active -76.95.117.89 (talk) 02:07, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: Article was deleted via stickyprod. You need to provide sources before an undeletion request will be entertained. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 03:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Articles using divbox template

Deleted because it was empty (C1 speedy), however it is populated by Template:Divbox when there is misuse of the template to assist in cleanup. From the template documentation: "This template will automatically add inappropriate uses to category:articles using divbox template for cleanup." I'm guessing there's probably a template or category for such categories as this one that was not applied to protect it form mistaken deletion (It's been a while since I've been really active). I came across this, figured it was a mistake, so here is the undeletion request. Cheers. -Ned Scott 05:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - all set. You may have been thinking of {{emptycat}} :) Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie Fontana (2nd)

reasoning -70.188.174.198 (talk) 17:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know of ANY conflicts of interest in the Wiki posted biography of Melanie Fontana We are turning this over to others to take care of for her. PLEASE repost or send on to us a screen shot of the page so we can review what you are referring to.

thank you.

Janis Fontana manager 70.188.174.198 (talk) 17:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. Also, I can identify the conflict of interest: You're her manager, and thus you have a stake in whether or not she does well. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:53, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can some admin please e-mail this person (jfontana57@cox.net or melfontanamusic@yahoo.com) a copy of the deleted text. I don't have the ability to do this. And yes, the IP has admitted to a COI on my talk page. Skier Dude (talk) 02:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Meet The Browns (TV Series)

I've gotten permission from the company tbs to use the image but the image uploading page was too complicated and i didn't know where to click when you have permission to use an image. -Shadd21 (talk) 22:46, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This image is licensed under a non-free license & has a valid Fair Use Rationale. There is no "permission" necessary. Skier Dude (talk) 02:31, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Black (cartoonist)

Adam Black is the cartoonist that did KISS 4K for Gene Simmons, currently does Locus, has an international release coming out in April, his second. His fans have made several pages for him but they get deleted. I am representing him now. He is culturally relevant, and agin his 'Freak A Holic' based on Greg Broussard's (The Egyptian Lover) Freak A Holic song from the 80's. Greg has a page. What does one have to do to have legitimacy. I see people that have done far less who have current pages. Can you please reconsider allowing his article to be published? -67.61.58.140 (talk) 01:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! There has not been a page under the name Adam Black (cartoonist). Is there some other title that it could be? Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I know that three seperate pages have been set up, all deleted by editors for some reason. I was just going to make another one but I saw this forum, so I'm trying this first. Should I just make another page?

Red Foundry

It does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, as was listed as the reason for its deletion. I would like to request a review of the page to contest the speedy deletion claim. If the Wikipedia community determines that the deletion was not incorrect or in error, please send me a copy of the page in its most recent un-deleted form. Thank you. -Bkedzorski (talk) 03:18, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fracture (fanzine)

This article was deleted with the reason "It's an old article, but is the subject notable?". I would suggest that it is notable since Fracture Fanzine was the largest punk fanzine the UK has ever produced and was particular dominant during the late 1990s and early 2000s, producing 25 issues with a distribution of over 5000 for each issue. It is listed in the article titled 'Punk zine' amongst other notable punk fanzines of the past 30 years. It is also referenced in the article 'Fanzine' as a significant fanzine in the early 2000s -Remains (talk) 05:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 13:50, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hadouken (software)

interested in information about this software, can think of no reason this should have been deleted, it is linked to from 'Comparison of BitTorrent clients' -71.59.251.26 (talk) 12:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Security Now

I think this page was deleted at some point, and replaced (maybe by accident in the process the AfD mentioned on the page?). There's links to it in various summaries of edits in the main article, and I'm quite sure I've been on that Talk-page in the past. I don't know what happened, but it seems the page was accidentally deleted. If so, can it please be restored? -DanielPharos (talk) 15:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the quick response! I've restored the content to former glory, thanks again! --DanielPharos (talk) 16:05, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

yubbe

i don't know but i think some one deleted it for envy reasons... i didn't violated copy right or anything else. it was simple page talking about a town in Somalia - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jingo11 (talk • contribs)

File:Julius seelye bixler colby.png

the content was non-free and the explanation was clear - the person pictured is dead. -Nickline4 (talk) 21:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ASK SURREALISM KOMBAT

WARNING: you did not submit your request correctly!

You need to replace the "PageName" parameter of the template with the name of the page that you would like restored, spelled correctly, with proper case. Please click the "[edit]" link to the right, and replace the contents of this section with:

{{subst:refund|The name of the requested page|your reasoning for asking to undelete it}}

article based on a real surrealist and visual artist -Artsurrexpress (talk) 22:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan Gallagher

Article was first created on November 14, 2010, but was deleted. It has now been re-created and I request that its edit history also be restored. -Dolovis (talk) 04:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: The first three revisions were deleted as G8 (copyright violation) so they're not going to be restored. The last 7 appear to be a fight over the redirect, no substance. I'm not seeing that there's really anything worthwhile restoring in those 7 prior revisions. Is there something specific that needs to be restored?Skier Dude (talk) 05:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at the public logs, the article was created on November 14, 2010. I apologize if I am mistaken on this point and it was only a redirect. Dolovis (talk) 05:30, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not done No problem :) nothing worthwhile to restore... Skier Dude (talk) 05:23, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New York Angels

The article is a straightforward, factual article that had been uncontroversially in place and edited for several years -Yorker (talk) 07:25, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, also, can another admin take a good look prodder's contribs and especially his user page. I'm about to leave for work. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:04, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

50/50 Twin

According to WP:Proposed deletion this article must be undeleted automatically on request. Article was deleted by PROD on 12 May 2008. Although first article may have been written too early in his career, this artist has now released 6 albums. Whether or not he has now achieved sufficient notability should be decided through AfD. -Ei1sos (talk) 20:29, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Ericsson-Zenith

"Request of subject" is not a valid reason to delete this article. -140.221.233.180 (talk) 21:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ground level

Thanks to the assist of Wiki contributors, I am happy to keep the page now, as it reflects the appropriate look / read of a wiki page - please cancel my deletion request - thank you, HoloGraphica Nov 18, 2011 -HoloGraphica (talk) 06:39, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - AFD was withdrawn and closed. GB fan 12:39, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Selena Gomez in Cyrillic

Considered as multilingual name in Cyrillic. This was used in Russian, Ukrainian, Belarusian, Bulgarian, and the Turkic and Mongolic languages of Russia, and in Mongolian. -Namiin Azhar (talk) 12:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Alternate. This would likely to transliterate. -Namiin Azhar (talk) 12:27, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 September 30#ເຊລີນ້າ ໂກເມຊ, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Taelus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. GB fan 12:33, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nfur

This redirect was deleted per G6 without any reasoning given as to why it fits said criterion. The deleting admin is currently not active, so I can't ask them personally. I could undelete it myself but since I created it, I don't want to use the tools in this case. Regards SoWhy 12:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC) -SoWhy 12:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 17:06, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Bittner

I created the new article Eric R. Bittner today and then noticed the deletion of Eric Bittner-article in December 2005. Since then, he has published a book on quantum dynamics, thereby passing the notability criterion. I suggest to restore the "Eric Bittner" article as history-only, and to replace it with a redirect to the new article "Eric R. Bittner". -Chris Howard (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem from my side if that conforms better to the rules. Had just thought that it would be more respectful to the original editors to re-create the history of that earlier version. In any case, no, I have not used anything from the old one (and it is not available to me). --Chris Howard (talk) 19:13, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The admin who had closed the AFD discussion is currently inactive, and as there is no need to raise it to the level of a WP:DRV, I take back the request for undeletion. I have created it afresh as redirect now. --Chris Howard (talk) 06:16, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leroy Ryals

It was deleted because of a lack of source, I added in a source to make it legitimate. -Poseya67 (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Buffy articles for userfication

I would like to request that content which I worked a lot on, which has since been deleted for reasons mainly of notability is userfied with full links to historical edits to my talk page. I hope to use some of the most notable and useful material from within these old articles for trans-wiking to the Buffy wikia.

Pages are not accessible, but likely are to administrators?:

Also there are now redirects at some articles that were previously much bigger article but the history is not accessible to me, could these also be userfied with original content no longer seen in the 'history'?

Please let me know if this is possible? I can be reached at my talk page Paxomen (talk) 04:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

-AR-

Why has the my page been taken down the page is very important as this is a new band. that has had a high demand for information about the band -Robdeboer (talk) 13:13, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Wikipedia is not a billboard. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:13, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Australian_Intervarsity_Choral_Societies_Association

Article has been restored as a redirect, and restoration of the talk page is needed to present the AfD history. -Unscintillating (talk) 01:17, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Skier Dude (talk) 01:27, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Burning Sensation in Throat

The article is fully reliable as the content of this article can be found in any Internal Medicine book -Ciclone (talk) 01:29, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You could have removed the prod tag from the article yourself. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:01, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3

I dont know if i fixed the image or not(im not that good at editing) is it still a candidate for delectation? -Shadd21 (talk) 05:49, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The tag no longer applies, but the reason for use in the rationale is inadequate. Why do we need a screenshot in the article, please explain. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:04, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because i was replacing an image that was already in the article Shadd21 (talk) 14:26, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brain Drain versus Brain Circulation

I have checked the links provided, but they deal with medical aspects of the brain, not the social scientific aspect of brain drain versus brain circulation. These are two completely different issues. The only available discussion of the topic on the Internet is a commentary I made on an Internet discussion forum. -141.156.199.216 (talk) 15:32, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CHORUS+

I'd like to improve the article, but it was deleted before i had the chance. Please sent me a copy, so i can edit it in my user space -Grsjst (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=461642807"