Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Appearance
Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. |
---|
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important!
|
This page was last updated at 04:49 on 15 June 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
Reports
Bot-reported
User-reported
- 72.152.174.76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) IP user apparently been vandalizing or adding original research on articles. I've warned the individual regarding Birds of Prey (comics). NeoBatfreak (talk) 22:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- 81.106.105.165 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On 28 Days Later (diff): vandalism after final warning. AldezD (talk) 22:25, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- 98.25.41.17 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) single-purpose IP user who has only arrived to spam articles with a certain unsourced and out-of-context quote, got reverted multiple times. Is the warning I left on the talk page enough for now? XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 02:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. You did a very good job of writing the warning, though. But it would probably warrant more than just the one in the case of this sort of behavior. - Vianello (Talk) 05:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. Needs multiple warnings before action is taken? Understandable. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- IPs generally do, at least. Precedent for most users is they need an unambiguous final warning before action's taken. In my experience this can be relaxed a little with unambiguous vandalism-only accounts, but usually users get more than one warning unless they're doing something really flagrant. Thanks! - Vianello (Talk) 05:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Good to know, just thought I'd bring attention to this IP. Keep a watch. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:37, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- IPs generally do, at least. Precedent for most users is they need an unambiguous final warning before action's taken. In my experience this can be relaxed a little with unambiguous vandalism-only accounts, but usually users get more than one warning unless they're doing something really flagrant. Thanks! - Vianello (Talk) 05:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. Needs multiple warnings before action is taken? Understandable. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. You did a very good job of writing the warning, though. But it would probably warrant more than just the one in the case of this sort of behavior. - Vianello (Talk) 05:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- 115.188.134.4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Ryan Nelsen (diff): vandalism after final warning. CardinalDan (talk) 07:38, 1 April 2014 (UTC)