Jump to content

User talk:Xtremedood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Раціональне анархіст (talk | contribs) at 22:00, 8 May 2015 (→Mughal–Maratha Wars). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Xtremedood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 03:37, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hey, I noticed your extensive edits on various Persian Sufi-related articles. I am just wondering, are you at all possibly from Iran yourself? I am fascinated by much of Persian / Iranian culture, and I would like to learn more about it however I can. RezaFarhad (talk) 19:11, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shahab al-Din Abu Hafs Umar Suhrawardi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DRN

There is a discussion on the DRN about the edits at Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Alaih-e-Salam. Please comment with your viewsFreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hafez

I guess I removed a reference that should have stayed in Hafez. Sorry about that. I'd just like to remind you that it is customary to leave a brief edit summary before you save your edit. Happy editing! CorinneSD (talk) 01:01, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Battle articles being wrongly edited

are you okay or not Do you not know about battle of Sirhind,battle of sarsa etc. See fateh burj it commemorates the victory of Sikhs over sirhind and defeat of Mughal army .why you are editing inappropriate information  ? Are you a communal person you not even know history and you just keep editing false information. Check the sources then you will realize your mistakes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ak107839 (talk • contribs) 15:54, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, this user got blocked for disruptive editing. Seems the IP address is now doing the same thing to the same pages, I'm now watching those pages too, so will help remove these bad edits. Hopefully this craziness will go away. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Heads up; Ak107839 and Aradhyasharma are sockpuppets of indef blocked Amanharleen, which are all now indef blocked. Richard Harvey (talk) 12:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Purandar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mughal, Purandar and Jai Singh
Battle of Chaksana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mughal and Bharatpur
Battle of Khelna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mughal and Asad Khan
Battle of Lalsot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mughal and Tunga
Battle of Raigarh (1689) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mughal and Rajaram
First Battle of Katwa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mughal and Hooghly
Siege of Gingee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Mughal and Rajaram
Battle of Bhupalgarh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mughal
Battle of Burdwan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mughal
Battle of Kalyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mughal
Battle of Satara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mughal
Battle of Torna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mughal
Second Battle of Katwa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mughal
Siege of Jinji (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mughal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

If you do not stop your vandalism now, you will be dragged to an administrator and your ip will be blocked. Ghatus (talk) 10:32, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully administration is wise enough to see the immense biases in the Maratha-related articles here. They are filled with little more than Hindutva propaganda. Xtremedood (talk) 03:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, you are destroying the entire articles. Almost blanking the whole pages. Deleting all the references. Not improving at all. There is talk page. Discuss every point there. I am just undoing your blanking of Wiki pages.Ghatus (talk) 05:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is not blanking. It is the removal of unsourced, biased, and incorrect materials, which happens to make up the majority of many of these articles. Xtremedood (talk) 17:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Favonian (talk) 18:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Template:Z33[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Saunshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malabar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Invite

A Barnstar!
Please participate
There's a voting going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. We need more participation. The issues can't remain without a resolution. Please, check it out. Closure of the discussion has started. (refresh) Please, hurry. 78.149.193.255 (talk) 16:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-Pakistani War of 1971

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning Kansas Bear, however I have reviewed the edits and I believe that I was only at 2 reverts (please correct me if I am wrong). I made my initial changes on April 11, at around 11:15-11:30. However the first revert was done by Ghatus, on 06:45, 13 April 2015‎. I reverted for the first time on 04:30, 13 April 2015‎ ‎ and the second time on 07:09, 13 April 2015‎, which makes for a total of two reverts. Ghatus on the other hand reverted 3 times (with me) and more with other users. Xtremedood (talk) 02:53, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN/I

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 11:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of WP:ARE

Don't forget to check WP:ARE. There is a complaint about you. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 22:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 20 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of converts to Islam from Christianity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Dutch, Portugese, Murat Reis and Ottoman
List of converts to Islam from Hinduism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Indian
List of former Buddhists (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tibetan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 23 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New

Excuse me sir. Good afternoon I want to say that you are editing irrelevant information about the Second Battle of Anandpur .I 'll suggest you to go through the article first . Shah439 (talk) 06:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shah439, go to the talk page, I have set up a discussion where you may add any relevant information. If you have proof state it. What you are doing seemingly amounts to vandalism. Xtremedood (talk) 07:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Editing at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 4 May 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 13:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of converts to Islam from Christianity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Irish and Scottish
Battle of Jalalabad (1710) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Jalal Khan
Battle of Jammu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mughal
Dhul-Nun al-Misri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Egyptian
Siege of Sirhind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Wazir Khan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation accepted

The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Editing at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Editing at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.

As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear.

For the Mediation Committee, User:TransporterMan (talk) 15:48, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Canvassing

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:43, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Xtremedood, please do read WP:CANVASSING. Perhaps you can rectify the situation by notifying other editors to make a balanced collection as shows in the guidelines. Otherwise, the votes of the editors you have canvassed will be discounted. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Editing at Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of converts to Christianity from Islam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ottoman
Sufism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Britain

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mughal–Maratha Wars

Please start a formal move request if you want to change the title of the page. Abecedare (talk) 15:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 8, 2015

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Editor assuming he gets to vote in his own AfD nomination. Thank you. Pax 22:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at List of converts to Islam from Hinduism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Delibzr (talk) 02:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Xtremedood&oldid=661474419"