Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Appearance
Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here. |
---|
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important!
|
This page was last updated at 05:48 on 1 September 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
Reports
- 69.5.108.210 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- 171.234.8.154 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:53, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- 74.248.184.86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Re-posting. persistent addition of unsourced content to multiple articles, using many IPs, of which this is the most recent. I'm inclined to continue re-posting as long as the user edits in this manner, whatever accounts they use. 2601:188:1:AEA0:587E:8905:7942:88F3 (talk) 04:33, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Well, there's probably a reason that an admin isn't taking action (likely because it isn't obvious vandalism) ANI is thataway... 172.58.40.242 (talk) 04:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- I suppose you're right. I tried this at ANI months ago, to no avail. So funk it. Feel free to remove the report. The inability or unwillingness to monitor such activity is a flaw of the project. But my takeaway is that our guidelines re: sourced content are less than meaningless. 2601:188:1:AEA0:587E:8905:7942:88F3 (talk) 04:39, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- If they're using multiple IP's than a block wouldn't necessarily rectify the issue, since they could "easily" switch to another one. Maybe WP:RFPP for some of the articles? 172.58.40.242 (talk) 04:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- I suppose you're right. I tried this at ANI months ago, to no avail. So funk it. Feel free to remove the report. The inability or unwillingness to monitor such activity is a flaw of the project. But my takeaway is that our guidelines re: sourced content are less than meaningless. 2601:188:1:AEA0:587E:8905:7942:88F3 (talk) 04:39, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Well, there's probably a reason that an admin isn't taking action (likely because it isn't obvious vandalism) ANI is thataway... 172.58.40.242 (talk) 04:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)