Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 21:35 on 15 November 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

Bot-reported

• 206.188.241.40 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 30 five times in the last 5 minutes (Large deletion from article by new editors, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:28, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Editor does show competence issues. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:12, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

• 50.81.237.112 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:51, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

  False positive. Edits are not vandalism.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• Souvik saha actor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Repeatedly recreates the article Cine kolkata / Cine Kolkata. He is the operator of this business [1] [2]. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

• Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 14:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

• Sreejith Sudhakar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Log history of repeated advertising despite last warning. SwisterTwister talk 15:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
• Jakob9999 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Creating joke/hoax pages after final warning. NOTHERE at the very least. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 17:12, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
• Khosla2020 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account; account is being used only for promotional purposes. 1 vandalism edit to Battletoads, talking about himself. First man to beat it? Srsly?

  1 self-promotion edit to a page about himself. uKER (talk) 18:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

• Peterpens (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) after being blocked at de-wiki for massive COI he came over to you to spread his COI here. I would recommend to show him the door. Pentachlorphenol (talk) 19:12, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. While it may be POV-pushing, I don't see where it's clear vandalism. Thus, I don't think this is the board to handle it. —C.Fred (talk) 19:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

• 2600:8807:C085:CF00:F058:ED88:E0F2:1C6C (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Reverting edits without cause.