Jump to content

User talk:Starship.paint

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 71.224.251.239 (talk) at 20:39, 17 April 2019 (→‎Spygate: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Mkdw/Wikibreak

WP:FOUR

Yeah, I'd be interested in going for that. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) #GG (talk) 10:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm free. One question: how do I get involved in the creation stage, since that apparently is the easiest bit to screw up in this thing? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) #GG (talk) 07:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) #GG (talk) 08:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I copied the expansion thing from WP:FOUR#Collaborations just to be sure that I got in on the article creation stage. It can go now. But yeah, the article's starting to look pretty good. I'm with you on the J.R. hook, sounds like the way to go. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) #GG (talk) 11:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not really familiar with the DYK process, so could you explain the QPQ thing? How would you provide it if I nominated the article? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 01:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't reviewed anyone so how could I nominate the article? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 01:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you have the QPQ, shouldn't you just make the nomination and say it's a co-nomination/co-creation just so we don't get shot down instantly when they see that I don't have a QPQ. You also know how these DYKs actually work. I've gotten all my previous DYK credits without making any nominations myself or taking any part in any of the discussions. I'll jump in when they have any questions or comments about the DYK. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 09:30, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The name is mentioned for example here (盟友タッグ) and here. It can be incorporated into the article once we start writing the storylines/event sections. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'll be concentrating on the storylines and aftermath sections as I feel those are my strong suit. Are we doing all sections in the next part and not "saving" them for the final part? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 03:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've written the first version of the storylines section. You're a veteran of this good article thing, so I'm all for you making any edits or voicing any concerns about the section. Same with pictures, I added two, but these can be moved around when you're done with the event section and know which ones you want to use there. I've tried to keep the Japanese sources to an absolute minimun, using them only when I couldn't find the same info in English. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 16:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I was actually thinking about cutting all the title matches apart from the IWGP Tag Team Championship and IWGP Heavyweight Championship, since those have absolutely no storyline behind them at all, just some challenges, and since the section's name is "storylines". How do you feel about that? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 13:45, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There's not much I could add to the other title match storylines. Omega made his first after signing a contract, had no prior storyline with Taguchi, did not earn his title shot anywhere. Taguchi for the past months had been involved a separate feud with Suzuki-gun. Ishii had no interaction with Makabe, who came out of nowhere to challenge for the title, having been involved in the Bullet Club storyline the past months. Ibushi also came out of nowhere to challenge Nakamura. He had just become a heavyweight, before getting injured and this was his return match. The IWGP Jr. Tag title is just an afterthought, it's always the same three/four teams in the title match with no real storylines ever. Bullet Club, meanwhile, is one of THE acts in NJPW, while absolutely not because of Yujiro, Fale or Jarrett, but I thought Jarrett's involvement in the match would justify this. The Suzuki-gun storyline also explains Pro Wrestling Noah's involvement and led to the whole Noah invasion storyline, which is one of the year's biggest puroresu storylines. The Naito/Styles thing should go, since I added that just to cover all the matches. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 14:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing that struck me was the "Out of Time" name for one of the Time Splitters' move. I can't find it in the sources (they mention moonsault/neckbreaker combo) and the move's actual name is "Outatime", presumably after the license plate of the DeLorean from Back to the Future. Other than that minor thing, it looks good to me. I'm also pretty much done with aftermath section. There's some bits I could add, most notably about Alex Koslov, but don't want to make it too long. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 12:03, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We could remove Suzuki-gun and/or Bullet Club from the storylines section if you want to, but I would wait for the actual FA review to see how they feel about its length. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 17:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 12:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If that's what it takes, then I guess that's how it's gotta go. Although I'd prefer to get it done as soon as possible, I'm in no particular hurry. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 09:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I noticed that yesterday. I checked a few links on the Internet Archive and they seem to be there for the most part. I'll archive the ones on my watchlist later today. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 07:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If by "MITB 2011" you mean Wrestle Kingdom 9, then yes. I'm good to go. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 12:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I just wanted to let you know that today's featured article is Money in the Bank (2011)! Congratulations and keep up the good work! Thanks! Ikhtiar H (talk) 12:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've been busy outside of Wiki lately so I missed seeing the article finally become a FA. About time, congrats! I'd give you another barnstar but I've already given you two!LM2000 (talk) 00:39, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers! InedibleHulk (talk) 12:44, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
I don't think so, but thanks. It's back in the article now. Somebody moved it aside for a TAKA Michinoku pic. Shouldn't happen twice. InedibleHulk (talk) 12:58, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
No, that's alright, too. Will probably have an RfC in the near-enough future. If you have an opinion on the matter, you could share it then. InedibleHulk (talk) 12:54, July 11, 2015 (UTC)
Like Cena, its time is now. But also like Cena, feel free to boo or cheer. "People Power", and all that. InedibleHulk (talk) 16:33, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Black Lives Matter

Template:Black Lives Matter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:03, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Triplemania XXII

First of all, thank you for your work on the Triplemania article I am glad to see someone else work on the Lucha articles, maybe in return I should work on a Japanese wrestling article after I am done with my Triplemania work ;-) I found something that could help give you a little detail for the event section if you need it - http://www.luchalibreaaa.com/eventos-magnos/triplemania/item/1659-noche-de-leyenda-en-triplemanía-xxii.html - it's the official AAA event recap, which yes is a primary source but it is not like anything in there is contentious, I figured it may just give you a few more details to work with.  MPJ -Fiesta Triplemania  03:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @MPJ-DK: - I'm almost done with the article, all that is left is to trawl through Medio Tiempo. I can't expand the Reception section more unless Medio Tiempo produces something, though. Plus the Gladiators website is dead. starship.paint ~ KO 02:31, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Cena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Five Knuckle Shuffle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IWGP

You left a message on my talk page months ago about tag reigns. I've been away because of college. I don't remember replying to you so I came by to drop you a line. --WillC 01:55, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for my first ever barnstar! - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 04:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestle Kingdom 9

  • @Miniapolis: - thank you so much for your extensive copyedit. Your hard work is greatly appreciated. Although, I have a dispute with the removal of the nicknames of moves in the Event section. As such, most of the moves only have their technical names remaining (like kick-brainbuster combination losing the Chasing the Dragon name). Are you strongly opposed to these nicknames? Because fans who watch will definitely be more familiar with move nicknames (called by commentators) than technical names which are not always mentioned. starship.paint ~ KO 13:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection

Can you redirect each event on WWE Insurrextion and thanks Mostafa Elsherbini (talk) 23:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mostafa Elsherbini (talk • contribs) 13:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template

Hi. I need a favor. I had a dicussion in the Template:WWE Personnel and the template was fully protected. However, it was protected a wrong version. I need to open a request, but it's to hard for me (languaje skills, too complex) Can you open the request? User:Wrabbjr902 put all injuried wrestlers as unassigned and some Main Roster wrestlers as NXT wrestlers. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had no choice but protect "the wrong version". But whatever is on the template should be backed up by sources found at List of WWE personnel. --wL<speak·check> 04:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

Sorry about not reviewing wrestle kingdom. It slipped my mind. If you re-nominate it I certainly will be the first to review it.--WillC 15:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me!

User:Wrabbjr902 has vandalized Template:WWE personnel on more than one occasion and has violated the 3RR rule. I've already reverted it twice and I even said I wasn't going to edit war with him, but he wants to anyway. He's already been warned by other users, but he blanks his talk page as a response. Can you please help me? -Keith Okamoto (talk) 05:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was Mikeymike2001 but I changed it. Thanks for helping. -Keith Okamoto (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fernandez-Gil

There is no need to hide any of his filmography JMichael22 (talk) 20:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

His IMDB shows all the episodes for the show a source shouldn't be needed for each one JMichael22 (talk) 00:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Never happened before

I've always wondered if this would happen but I never expected it too. Long time ago, about 6 years I think, I found out how to make a personal signature. I went through alot of versions, with colors, links, phrases (Joe's gonna kill you), etc. I finally settled on WillC since my name is William Chaudoin and I liked the idea of WillC since it sounds like "We'll See". Sounded sarcastic to me. Then one day about 4 years ago I think I ran across another user, User:WillC. I always wondered if his account and my signature would get confused and not until now has that occurred. To answer your question, I didn't write that article and I've never done a bio. Only non-wrestling articles I ever considered expanding was Transformers: Beast Wars, Disturbed (band) albums, Punisher related items, and TNA Impact! (video game) (though wrestling it is a game primarily). You may consult him, he/she may be of help.--WillC 05:46, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like User:Gloss did Josh Hutcherson. They do good work, I think they reviewed one of my GANs one time. Helpful person all the times I've dealt with them. Not sure how you thought I did it though.--WillC 05:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It is fine with me. I just figured you got me confused with him. I kept thinking one day someone is going to mix the two of us up.--WillC 05:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You got a FB or something?--WillC 08:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Luis Fernandez-Gil

Gatoclass (talk) 19:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Award 4 U

Vjmlhds (talk) 00:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:John Morrison 2010.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Morrison 2010.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Funk

Hi. I'm sorry to disturb you again. It's about user Funkatastic. Do you think he has bad behavior and makes personnal atacks? Every time I talk into the tal page, looks like he's attacking me or mocking my opinion. He only says I gave my opinion without arguments. I gave my arguments and he says I'm not cooperating to find a consensus. I'm very burned with him. What do you recomend me?--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Carson

Hi, I see you've been active on the Carson article. I'd appreciate your help/advice re: the large credibility section I added. Lahaun (talk) 03:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. At least for the time being, Carson is no longer a surgeon or even a very well paid self-promoter, he's a presidential candidate and, as such, his credibility is of significant importance. And, more than any other 2016 candidate, Carson's appeal to voters is based largely on his personal narrative, his life story as told by him. If that story is false, his viability as a candidate and self-promoter collapses. The fact that Carson is receiving fast and furious media attention about mostly nothing other than his credibility reinforces the notion that his credibility is key to his overall biography. If he withdraws as a candidate, then, maybe the article can be revised, but until then, I think his credibility warrants a level 2 section. Lahaun (talk) 18:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for The Shield (professional wrestling)

An article that you have been involved in editing—The Shield (professional wrestling) —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Heytherehowsitgoin (talk) 00:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw you on the talk page for The Shield (professional wrestling) and ask for your support to merge Roman Reigns and Dean Ambrose to The Shield (professional wrestling). You can see my reason at the section on the talk page. Heytherehowsitgoin (talk) 00:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ultima Lucha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

Thanks for the support. I should be reviewing Wrestle Kingdom tonight. I think I have some extra time finally.--WillC 00:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You got a facebook or something?--WillC 23:06, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Yuletide

Happy Yuletide!

Merry Yuletide to you! (And a happy new year!)

Rhoark (talk) 00:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Shield

So, hello Starship (can I call you just Starship?). I see that you're semi-retired but there seems to be a conflict with the page about the pro wrestling group the Shield again (I know), and it would be great to see you weight-in in the talk page.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 02:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That IP user reverted your edit.--Keith Okamoto (talk) 04:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for keeping The Shield (professional wrestling) article in tact. I, along with you and others are reverting many edits that are obviously incorrect about the current state of the members of the group. Thank you. Heytherehowsitgoin (talk) 06:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Big Show and Kane.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Big Show and Kane.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:48, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RE

Hi. Thank you so much. Happy new year too :) BTW, I'll like you see this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtbtXhXWm5Y :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Reigns 2016

The Persona and reception section of Roman Reigns is too much extensive. I would prefer only keeping the persona contents and omitting the public reactions. If the abated information appears to be very less, the whole section should be removed. What are your thought regarding that? Currently, I am working on it to be a good article (I had read the criteria). Thanks. Ikhtiar H (talk) 07:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Ikhtiar H: - I disagree with omitting the public reactions ... the rejection of a top babyface by the audience definitely should be included. Others have raised the idea of merging the section into the History section, which can be considered... starship.paint ~ KO 10:06, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

semi-retired LOL

Yea so you are only spending time harassing me? Let's just start now... try to take this one down...

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Photograph_of_paper_rendering_of_Donald_Drumpf.jpg

--Potguru (talk) 06:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Tay (bot) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! RezonansowyakaRezy (talk | contribs) 14:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tay (bot) has been nominated for Did You Know

March 2016

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Tay (bot) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! RezonansowyakaRezy (talk | contribs) 18:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tay (bot)

On 8 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tay (bot), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that within a day of the release of the Microsoft chatterbot Tay on Twitter, it was taken offline because it started making inflammatory tweets? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tay (bot). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Two years ago ...
ultimate warrior
... you were recipient
no. 826 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

... and four! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:35, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

... and five! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again

No, that's not from the printed Observer. That's actually a quote from Meltzer from the May 2 Wrestling Observer Radio. You can listen to it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_S89nawI5vM (55 minutes in). リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 09:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really that well versed in the ins and outs of FA reviewing. I've never done it before, but I could look around if I see anything where I could give pointers especially if they're offering a review-for-review. Anyway, I'm ready for another go at the WK9 FA. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 10:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. Let's hope third time's the charm. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 06:09, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reigns' reception

Hi Paint. I have a question. Do you think the Reigns reception it's a little bit long? I mean, the section is long as his WWE career. I feel is overdetailed. What do you think? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think the section looks much better. Thanks :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Emma and Dana Brooke

However the sources already said with Dana Brooke or Emma, how is managing consider for you?TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 9:48, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

  • @TheBellaTwins1445: - when members of tag teams or stables (two or more active wrestlers) support each other at ringside, it might not be managing. Ambrose ringside when Rollins and Reigns wrestled. Kalisto ringside when Sin Cara wrestled. Barrett ringside when the rest of the League wrestled. In these controversial cases, the higher standard of a source saying "Dana is the manager of Emma" or "Emma is managing Dana" is needed in the sources. Just because Emma is at ringside at NXT TakeOver: Respect does not make her a manager. Just because Dana comes out with Emma on an episode of NXT and stays at ringside does not make her a manager either unless the source says so. starship.paint ~ KO 02:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Primo & Epico

This page was moved again. Can you have it moved back, please? - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 04:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page was put back again. Can you put it back to Primo & Epico? - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 23:05, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nicknames

Hi, Paint. I have a question. I saw you thanked my edition at Rhodes article, removing strange nicknames. I'll be honest, I'm really piss. Every time, I see a new "nickname" in the nicknames section, just because the wrestler or the commentarist called him one way or another. For example, AJ Styles, The Georgia Pitbull, The Blue Collar wrestler, A mastermind at innovative attacks... We're pretty fuck with Heyman and Wyatt promos. Do we have any method to include nicknames, not youtube videos? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's all good

No reason to be sorry for reverting my edit. If I'm wrong I'm wrong it's all good. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 16:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Starship.paint. You have new messages at MediaKill13's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SMS Körös, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scuttle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article for deletion

I could use your input on this matter View AfD Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 06:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Check this out

So check this out I just reported user Danratedrko cause he has been warned Numerous times on his talk page by myself and others in the past month. Yet continues to remove content he doesn't like with no real reason to remove, personally attacks users who change or revert his removals, and is now edit Waring with me. Judging from his contribution history he has been attacking users all aver the place for months. I cant change anything back he has screwed up on Wrestlemania 32 now cause Im on my 2nd revert on each of his changes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WrestleMania_32&diff=726853260&oldid=726804531

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WrestleMania_32&diff=726853482&oldid=726853260

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WrestleMania_32&diff=726853650&oldid=726853482

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WrestleMania_32&diff=726854164&oldid=726854143

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WrestleMania_32&diff=726854516&oldid=726854357

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Danratedrko

Admin it was reported to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:JamesBWatson/Open#User_edit_waring.2C_removing_content_and_personal_attacks

Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 22:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Im back and...................

Couldnt stay away lol.............Anyways I am already past my 3rd revert on List of WWE_World Heavyweight Champions IPS and new users keep chaging the name on it and I cant do anything about it, pretty sure there are no sources to back up the changes. WWE.com shows WWE World Heavywieght Championship. Pretty sure im gonna get a ban after changing back it so many times. Admin locked it down for a few days and reverted it back. I let the admin know I broke the rule and if i need to be blocked i wont fight it. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 04:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think we might......

I think we might have to get an admin involved in the Mr mcmahon deal.Shinkazamaturi keeps changing it even after a 3 to 1 vote for it to stay Vince not Mr, thoughts?? Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 05:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Admin already saw what he said and did, they said he changes it again he's blocked.Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 05:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think acknowledgement would be good. But not changing it everywhere. I don't know anymore getting kinda to the point where I just need to step away from all of this Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 17:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chris "WarMachineWildThing" is wrong. He also badly change the shield's accomplishment. For example, Adding WWE world title, Intercontinental title, Money in the Bank and Royal Rumble winning.--Shinkazamaturi (talk) 03:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wasnt gonna reply to this as I'm taking a break from WIKI at the moment but since it's a lie..... First off Ummmmm I never added any of those accomplishments to The Shield article NOT ONE, Which now makes you a liar and a troublemaker,Now I have in the past reverted edits which removed them from the article but that was before I noticed the memo on the article about nothing being added prior to Nov 2012 and After June 2014 after Starship pointed it out, then I removed them anytime they were added back and helped explain the memo better on the article so it was less confusing which I was thanked for by Starship, but I never added any of them to the article, others added them. As a matter of fact I removed the NXT title off of the article because I misread it to which I reverted myself and put it back. There is NOT one history log for The Shield that would show I EVER added any of the accomplishments you just accused me of adding to that article,they were added by others. So once again YOUR WRONG. Secondly you were not pinged by either Starship or I on this convo which means you are borderline WP: Harassment, Are you trying to get blocked or banned? Knock it off all your doing is making things worse for yourself and this is going to get you into nothing but trouble,LET IT GO,MOVE ON! Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 06:12, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

quite right

You are quite right, without the source review it would not have passed for FA yet, and I thanked him. Still not sure why people don't use google translate or other browser translators for foreign languages - there seems to be an aversion to those, which confuses me as I use them all the time and they're like 99% reliable.  MPJ-DK  11:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Might wanna check this out

Not sure why it was ever nominated in the first place. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 WWE draft Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 02:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Starship, I've greatly missed your precision-style takedowns in discussions. It was great to see that again in the IC title discussion.LM2000 (talk) 23:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WWE roster

Hi. Can you help us? Since the Draft, Vjmlhds and I have different opinions (again) about the WWE Roster article. He want to change the format, I prefer to use the old one. Can you give us your opinion at the talk page? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrestle Kingdom 9

Hi -- sorry to see that Wrestle Kingdom 9 failed for lack of reviews again. I'll keep an eye on it and if you renominate I'll be glad to support again. Best of luck. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 08:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Mike Christie: - thank you for support. I'll ping you when it's up again. Cheers! starship.paint ~ KO 13:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hi Starship, re. this, we normally only waive the two-week rule when noms have received little or no commentary. OTOH I realise that for the last few weeks of its life this one was in a similar situation and there were no outstanding issues when it stalled. So okay, go for it, but suggest leave it till after the weekend as we usually clear a few from the FAC list just before the start of a new week, and if you're notifying previous reviews it's up again you may as well do that at the start. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you are about to have another FA.--WillC 06:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like our little 15-month project is finally over. Now all that's missing is our WP:FOUR recognition. You gonna get the ball rolling for that? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 20:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TMSTFPWRS

re Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Archive 93#The Magical Search Tool For Pro Wrestling Reliable Sources

That links to http://www.google.com/search?q=%22insert+search+target+here%22+site:f4wonline.com+OR+site:pwtorch.com+OR+site:slam.canoe.ca+OR+site:pwinsider.com+OR+site:wrestleview.com+OR+site:baltimoresun.com+OR+site:independent.co.uk+OR+site:www.pwi-online.com

I am wondering if it would be possible for us to code this as a template that users might conveniently link to on their userpages (I would like to) if they would like to do a search for references which they could use to support material without generating objections.

I believe there is a way we could code this based on template:google and in the source code have an aesthetic alphabetized list of anything at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources#Official promotion websites or Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources#Websites proven reliable so that we could easily do a visual comparison of the sites in the template and the sites on the sources page to make sure all of them are listed.

For example as a start from what you listed:

  1. baltimoresun.com
  2. canoe.ca
  3. f4wonline.com
  4. independent.co.uk
  5. pwi-online.com
  6. pwinsider.com
  7. pwtorch.com
  8. wrestleview.com

TBA I notice:

  1. cagematch.net
  2. impactwrestling.com
  3. miami-herald.com
  4. prowrestling.net
  5. rohwrestling.com
  6. rollingstone.com
  7. skysports.com
  8. thehistoryofwwe.com
  9. wwe.com

I don't know if it's possible to site: for http://grantland.com/contributors/the-masked-man to limit to David Shoemaker's works in a search though. Actually that apparently redirects to http://grantland.com/contributors/david-shoemaker/ now. His latest article http://grantland.com/the-triangle/wwe-john-cena-next-babyface-roman-reigns-dean-ambrose-cesaro-alberto-del-rio-seth-rollins-hell-in-a-cell-raw/ makes me think if we had to include a URL it ought to be grantland.com/the-triangle/ which I figure is the name of his column there. Ranze (talk) 03:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Starship.paint. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remember what I said all those months ago?

Yeah, it didn't happen. [1] Sigh, c'est la vie. Banedon (talk) 08:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13Talk (sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Wrestle Kingdom 9 for TFA

This is to let you know that the Wrestle Kingdom 9 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 4 January 2017. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 4, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at San Bernardino, California. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You simply renamed the link to the 2015 shooting to "North Park Elementary School shooting". pretty silly to edit war when you are dead wrong. It isn't even a debatable fact. You made a quite proper link to the 2015 San Bernardino attack appear as if it was a link to the North Park Elementary School shooting. and then edit warred over it. John from Idegon (talk) 23:09, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Wrestle Kingdom 9. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:47, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:47, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:4

Yeah, it sure took a while, but we finally have it. And we were the first ones to do it jointly, so that's pretty cool. REEEEEbbon Salminen(talk) 11:09, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You too. REEEEEbbon Salminen(talk) 04:32, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41466116. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş

Hi! Thank you very much for your efforts and patience to improve the article Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş. It wouldn't reach this quality level without your continuous work. CeeGee 06:38, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jason Chee (para-athlete)

On 7 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jason Chee (para-athlete), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jason Chee won a gold medal in table tennis despite losing both his legs, his left arm, one right finger, and his right eye? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jason Chee (para-athlete). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jason Chee (para-athlete)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:04, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ottoman Empire

Thanks for your edits on Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş. Would you be interested in working on more Ottoman Empire related articles in the future?--The Man No With Name (talk) 04:46, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Muhamad Ridhwan

Hello! Your submission of Muhamad Ridhwan at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Makeandtoss (talk) 15:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Muhamad Ridhwan

On 11 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Muhamad Ridhwan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "The Chosen Wan" is the first Singaporean to hold a world title in professional boxing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Muhamad Ridhwan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Muhamad Ridhwan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In the Moor(e)s

I did a bunch of edits to the Roy Moore article simultaneously with yourself. I didn't even realize were were both doing it and am amazed that we didn't step on each other's toes while we were working away. Thanks for your efforts in cleaning it up. Articles like these rapidly grow "organically" and sometimes virtually explode with edits. Please take a look at what I've done, if you have time and you think my edits could stand improvement. I added some material from a few weeks ago that hadn't made it into the article, and tried to move the growing mass of material about the girls from the lede to the appropriate section. You don't seem all that "retired," but it's all relative, I guess. Activist (talk) 10:29, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Activist: - seeing your contributions I see you mean the main article, not the allegations one. I have barely edited anything on Moore outside of the allegations. Those other things are not within my interest right now because I have exams to study for (and I am not American). For your edits, most seem fine on the surface (I won't check what the sources said). My main concern is the writing "Moore had pursued and/or sexually assaulted numerous teenage girls as young as 14". Because pursuing 16 year olds is legal, even if immoral - and IIRC only one woman was below 14 16. I am cautious that this statement (for those not reading carefully) paints a worse picture than what is alleged like "pursued numerous 14 year olds" or "sexually assaulted numerous 14 year olds" or "sexually assaulted numerous teenage girls" starship.paint ~ KO 11:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I did mean the main article. I hadn't even looked at the allegations-only article until I saw that you mentioned it. I'm not aware of any allegations (so far) that Moore had approached or assaulted any girl under 14. The other teens I'm aware of have been 16 through 19. The oldest complaining was the 28 y/o at his law office. His wife was 24 when they married and he was 38. After the first two women disclosed his advances or assaults, I expected more "alleged" victims to quickly "come out of the woodwork," much in the manner of what happened to Harvey Weinstein or Kevin Spacey, or Arnold Schwarzenegger when he was running for governor of California. Also, Moore has been called a "pedophile." That's not a term that would be correctly used for a sexual attraction on the part of an adult to a girl who has reached puberty. That doesn't mean he's not one, just that no such allegations and confirmations have yet been aired. The encounter with the 14-year-old, as described, was a sexual assault by Alabama state law. He is said to have groped her over her underwear, feeling her breasts and genitals, allegedly. He also is alleged to have tried to place her hand over his genitals but she said she pulled away. Lastly, I used the term "numerous" because the major concern is about his past relationships with teenagers and hardly a day goes by when another woman steps forward to add to the charges, so I figured that would be a more durable description than a precise quantification. Is English your first language? If not, you're remarkably competent in it. Lastly, your clarifying the language about Byrne was very helpful. Byrne indeed claimed that he, himself, was a creationist, and the text was ambiguous before your edit. Activist (talk) 11:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Activist: - yeah English is my first language. I made a mistake in my own post above regarding the age. One below 16, who was 14. My other concerns remain as above. There was only one under 16 but a poor reading of "Moore had pursued and/or sexually assaulted numerous teenage girls as young as 14". may produce thoughts of many 14 year olds. I have no doubt that the sentence is factually correct - I just think that readers with a poorer grasp of English may think the accusations are worse than they already are (are there multiple 14-year olds? were they all sexually assaulted?). Just an issue with the phrasing. No comment on 'pedophile' - never came to my mind, not saying he is one. starship.paint ~ KO 14:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Suggest The allegations collectively portrayed Moore as having pursued numerous teenage girls and sexually assaulting some of them, of which one was as young as 14. There were also similar allegations made by women in their 20s. starship.paint ~ KO 14:35, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If another editor hasn't already done so, I'll make the change, since if you do so you would be restricted from making another revert within 24 hours. I wasn't thinking about the confusion that might come with respect to someone for whom English is not their first language. Thanks so much for the input. Activist (talk) 20:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The lede paragraph in question had been changed by another editor before I wrote the above. I modified the sentences in question within the spirit of, and along the lines you suggested, though not verbatim. On television today, Moore's actions have been characterized as "pedophilia." At this point, I think that's a semantic overreach. Thanks again for your helpful input. 23:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
I should have read the Talk page before I first edited, though there was no harm done. There was prior discussion about the issues we raised. Some nitwit reverted my edits to the lede. He (?) thought that it needed a specific number of victims, though that's changing like the tab on a taxicab meter as it's constantly rolling over. He thought it was also only about sexual assaults on teenagers as if those over 19 didn't really count. Ugh! Another insisted on adding Moore's long time defense attorney's ludicrous claim that the yearbook dedication was forged. This sort of thing generates feelings of futility. I'll take a look at what hash the article may be now. Thanks. Activist (talk) 18:39, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Epico and Hunico for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Epico and Hunico is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epico and Hunico until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.User talk:Feedback12:23, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Starship.paint. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Starship.paint|'''starship''']][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|'''.paint ~''']] '''<span style="border:2px solid black">[[User talk:Starship.paint|<font style="color:white;background:black;">KO</font>]]</span>''' : starship.paint ~ KO

to

[[User:Starship.paint|'''starship''']][[Special:Contributions/Starship.paint|'''.paint ~''']] '''<span style="border:2px solid black">[[User talk:Starship.paint|<span style="color:white;background:black;">KO</span>]]</span>''' : starship.paint ~ KO

—Anomalocaris (talk) 05:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:55, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Diva Dirt - Is It Reliable?

There is a discussion currently ongoing in which we are trying to reach a consensus if Diva Dirt is reliable. You can view the discussion here. There has only been a couple of people who have responded. We need a wider input from more people. You're response is needed and appreciated. Thanks. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 21:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 12:39, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Template:Z33[reply]

With this edit you have violated the page restrictions referenced above, which are in force at article Melania Trump. Please edit carefully going forward. — JFG talk 16:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is akin to an "enforced BRD" rule. Often used on hot controversial topics. — JFG talk 20:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update on the Last Jedi stuff

Just letting you know the text was implemented (version 3), and that there is currently another RfC. At the moment, it doesn't seem that editors are interested in the latest RfC. And at the draft page, we are discussing how to preserve the draft. Anyway, at the article talk page, I remember you noting that you were busy, and I see that you haven't edited in a few days. So I'm updating you on the happenings. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the Trump presidency, 2018 Q1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doug Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Presidency of Donald Trump, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "publish changes" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. SMP0328. (talk) 03:18, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33

Hi. In addition to the refreshed BLP warning and the Post-1932 American Politics warning recently added by Coffee... Please stop edit warring at Dana Loesch. We've discussed the matter and it isn't resolved, so at this point if you insist on including that content in the article I'd suggest that you pursue dispute resolution. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:41, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March for Our Lives

We were editing March for Our Lives at the same time. When I clicked Save, Wikipedia accepted my version, but it may have stomped on edits you had just made. It would be easier (for me, anyway) for you to make your edits again than for me to patch them in. Sorry for the inconvenience. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:33, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spygate (conspiracy theory), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Hayden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spygate

Hey, there! It looks like you did a wonderful job of expanding the Spygate article that I tried to create but that got reverted into a disambiguation page. At least the article actually exists! Also, did you do a copy-and-paste when you first created the new article? I don't see my username in the history anywhere, but the first version of the article is definitely the one that I started. I've asked for a history merge to swing these together, though I've no idea how an admin will handle it. Anyhow, just wanted to say "Nice job!" The piece needed to be written, because the public is looking for it everywhere. Well done. A loose noose (talk) 14:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spygate (conspiracy theory), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Speaker of the House of Representatives (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mike Huckabee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Spygate (conspiracy theory)

Hello! Your submission of Spygate (conspiracy theory) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:04, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Presidency of Donald Trump

Hello. Your edit at Presidency of Donald Trump seems to partly restore, without obtaining consensus on the talk page, your similar edit that was challenged, hence violating page restrictions.

Please self-revert. Politrukki (talk) 15:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Add"

I've noticed that you are using the vague edit summary of "add" in most of your recent article edits. Could you please take a few extra seconds per edit to write a few words about what you're adding? ~Awilley (talk) 13:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd briefly specify what you are adding, it would be easier for your fellow editors to understand what happened to an article, just from its history, without reading every diff. — JFG talk 05:00, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed: many thanks! — JFG talk 09:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aung San Suu Kyi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Jamal Khashoggi

 You are invited to join the discussion at Jamal Khashoggi. Looks like you Forgot to declare these refs here. Please declare or remove that as it is causing ref errors at Assassination of Jamal Khashoggi and [Jamal Khashoggi]] DBigXrayᗙ 08:53, 20 October 2018 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

Neville of WWE is no more, and hes using is old known PAC Name

@Powderkegg: @203.106.221.220: @PlayPus2: @Crawnax: @GeicoHen:@Ribbon Salminen:@HughMorris15: @Liljosheeyaaaa: Nevile is no more in WWE and he went back using his old known Pac Ring Name. Support the PAGE Move Request

Move Request > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Neville_(wrestler)#Requested_move_13_November_2018

Colton Meltzer (talk) 01:25, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Starship.paint. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict

Yes sorry, I wasn't aware of the edit conflict. That was not intentional. --denny vrandečić (talk) 03:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meatpuppetry

It may not be that particular reddit page you posted, but I do not doubt that there is some forum somewhere that is behind this activity. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:50, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • When I filed this for oversight, I had a feeling but no evidence. You found paydirt. Now I feel confident calling out some accounts publicly. I'll need you to chime in though. You'll get pinged. Great work. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:33, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Muboshgu: - I've got more. Did you see my post at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Donald_Trump#Recent_possible_meatpuppetry_by_/r/the_donald See links 7/8/9/10 starship.paint ~ KO 04:41, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Starship.paint, no, I hadn't seen that yet. They sure have been an active bunch. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:44, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Many have watched as wikipedia has morphed into the largest purveyor of fake history the world has ever known. So very few have noticed, even fewer have cared. A Big Thank You for bringing the truth to light. -moe/Canada Moefuzz (talk) 06:41, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Moefuzz - thanks, although I’m not sure you would have given me this barnstar had you known how much of the Spygate article was written by me. Still, I am committed to reflect the reporting of reliable sources on the matter - if reliable sources give alternate definitions, we need to discuss how to include them. starship.paint ~ KO 01:05, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:27, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Muboshgu: - thank you for granting me this, and thank you for your effort in monitoring my contributions. I acknowledge that this is only for reverting vandalism, and I've tested it out. Frankly, I hope I won't have to use it. I guess we'll see if that it really the case XD starship.paint ~ KO 10:27, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spygate

The NY Times article is an op-ed of her original article-breaking the news that Trump was being spied(it is a synonym for counter intelligence) upon by the federal government. That is the start of Spygate. First step-Trump is crazy no one is wiretapping him! Second step-oh yes he is being wiretapped for his own good. To Trump now explicitly accusing Strozk and Page and hundreds of others of treason-that's not related to Spygate!

Having been here since day 10-seeing the mass exodus of editors-I get it. Left wing cabal encyclopedia. Even by those standards-The Spygate page is embarrassing.

The goalposts went from "no one is spying on Trump" to unless Obama is convicted of treason, Spygate is a hoax. BTW I noticed 99% of you edits were during what most people consider the work week. You may want to hide that better.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Starship.paint&oldid=892933669"