User talk:JBsupreme

Welcome to my talk page!

Welcome to my talk page. Please respect Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. PLEASE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE, NOT THE TOP. Thank you.

---

Welcome...

Welcome!

Hello, JBsupreme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

• Help
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Bash Kash (talk) 20:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Stellar evolution

I was wondering how come you removed my edit even though it was correct I said that a nebula is also know as a stellar nursury how is that not true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Little billy 123 (talk • contribs) 23:45, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

DJ WARRIOR

Um, actually there are many references throughout the entry, can you read? or do you just take an atto-second to look at something and say 'nope! delete'. Useless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Journaldiction (talk • contribs) 21:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Rick ross (rapper)

On the Rick Ross (rapper) page you changed the links at the bottom back after i had edited them?. The so called official rick ross trilla website is not anything related to rick ross any more its been used for advertising for a while now.--Front2back (talk) 18:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

You are correct and I have fixed that link. JBsupreme (talk) 20:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

noble dru & phashara pages

please advise on the corrections that should be made to prevent the pages from being marked for deletion. Kirkout (talk) 16:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Lil Wayne

Stop deleting the facts about gillie and lil wayne. I dont know if your mad that its true or what but i think people deserve to know the truth. So stop changing it. I am not taking sides, i just believe people need to know the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smokingintherain56 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

GZA

It'll expire later today. If the idiots start up again, I'll put it to semi. DS (talk) 17:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Michael Potts: AfD dialogue

Please revisit Michael Potts article (of which I am the principal author). Contrary to the assertion that Google News features only one link to "michael potts" +"rocky mountain institute," I have provided a link showing that in fact, there are eight links. For example, I have just added to the article, under External Links, a Denver Post interview with Michael Potts on March 31, 2007, in which he speaks about his personal and business philosophies. Thank you for your time. I do appreciate your help in strengthening this article.Jhutson64 (talk) 15:44, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Software

Hello JBsupreme. You have been invited to join WikiProject Software, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the Software-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of project members. You may also wish to add {{User WikiProject Software}} to your userpage and {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Software/Announcement-u}} to the top of your talk page with the heading ==WikiProject Software Announcement==. If you know someone who might be interested, please pass this message onto others by pasting this code into their talk page {{Software invite|~~~~}} with the following heading == WikiProject Software ==. Thanks, Tyw7, formerly Troop350 (Talk ● Contributions) 09:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Spider Loc & Young Buck controversy

Hey boss, what is the issue you have with the Spider Loc and Young Buck controversy that you keep deleting the entire paragraph after numerous users have updated and added content to it? Are you not recognizing the beef as factual? Check out Spider Loc's homepage or MySpace page or any one of a thousand websites (including MTV) that have covered the controversy. I think at the very least, there needs to be a section for this controversy considering Spider has released several diss tracks on mixtapes and has confirmed that the primary diss track "Lean On Me" will be appear on his next album. I wont re-edit the page until I hear back from you, but please consider the addition as I think it adds a lot to the page. Thanks. (209.87.194.21 (talk) 14:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC))

It just needs a cite from a reliable publication, see WP:RS - otherwise it falls under original research which is generally not permitted, especially so for WP:BLP articles. JBsupreme (talk) 19:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Whut up homie?

Why did you delete my information on the butterfly? Rob was not the "lead" in the story, plus you deleted the info on his kids, why? I take it you are a Juggalo, right? Then you sjould know how important that story is. I have been a down with ICP for 12+ years and know there history, matter of fact I am sitting here with Joes book in front of me. I am goin to go ahead and put back my stuff you deleted. MCL.

Butterfly

I went ahead and put the chapters up on the Behind the paint link, wich the first chapter is the citation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 1WickedClown (talk • contribs) 02:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Joseph Bruce

I understand your edits. Thanks for your patience. But there is a problem with the user 1WickedClown. He seems not to listen, and even became angry with me when I tried to explain that he is writing information that is not necessary. I'm not sure what to do with him. It seems he does not care to even listen to the rules. Maybe you can do something? Juggalobrink (talk) 04:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

There isn't much I can do, other than try to explain it the same way you did. He appears to be a newly registered editor and does not understand how Wikipedia operates yet. JBsupreme (talk) 04:49, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Well thank you anyway. Juggalobrink (talk) 04:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

That means F.T.F.O--1WickedClown (talk) 09:23, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:TABOO

Hi. Interested in your thoughts on this. Peter Damian (talk) 18:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC).

Jake Gyllenhaal

Hey,

I noticed you recently reverted someone on Jake Gyllenhaal and asked them to cite their sources. I thought you might like to know that the info is already in the article, well sourced and well written. :) Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your excellent job with reverting vandalism and challenging unsourced information in the Travis McCoy article, I hereby award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Keep up the great work! Royalbroil 14:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree with you about requiring strong sources for any information in the article. The article is a magnet for vandalism and unsourced speculation, and just reverting the vandalism / speculation has put it in my 5 most edited articles. We need to keep being aggressive in removing all unsourced additions to the article to keep the article in compliance with WP:BLP. You've been doing a great job! Royalbroil 14:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Cavlan

Greetings, JB. You !voted to delete the article on Michael Cavlan due to absence of "evidence of non-trivial coverage by multiple, reliable publications". After a few minutes of research, I found such coverage and added it to the article; would you care to revisit your comment? Thanks, Skomorokh 23:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

A little confusion

Hi there, I noticed you removed an artist's entire discography besides albums, as you did in this edit. If you read Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD/Discography, it states: Pages on performers should have discography sections. These should be subdivided into albums and singles, or other simple systems as needed. Because Tyga's discography is small, it is appropriate to have the subsections of singles, guest appearances, and so on. Removing something per a talk page, in this case Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians, is incorrect. Just thought I'd point it out. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 05:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

No I would have to disagree with you on your point of guest appearances and would be willing to discuss that with you on a more appropriate talk page, such as the relevant article talk page or the WikiProject talk page. JBsupreme (talk) 00:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Possible Socks of Jkliajmi on Template:Regions_of_the_world

There are two IPs within range of eachother that keep making the same edits as this banned user (78.146.17.244, 78.146.70.120). I am suspecting that they are the same as Jkliajmi. What should be done to check?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Regions_of_the_world&action=history

Thegreyanomaly (talk) 20:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Leon Jackson

Since you've given the IP a "blatant vandal" warning, I can block it after the next vandalism. Thanks for letting me know. ... discospinster _talk 01:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

OK it's blocked. ... discospinster _talk 01:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

My bad

--Blehfu (talk) 05:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Original Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For endorsing many of my never-ending prods. Thanks for the support! DiverseMentality(Discuss it) 01:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

AFD spam

Could you please take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink's fifth studio album. I have added (the newly released) confirmed release date and I have expanded the article and added sources. If you still feel the article needs to be deleted, no problem. However I would be grateful if you'd take a look. Regards, --Cameron* 16:47, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I did not see this sooner I've been signed off for the weekend. If there is something I missed could you please present it to deletion review? I cannot do much more since I am not an admin. JBsupreme (talk) 04:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

One Be Lo

I have requested here that User Hoponpop explain what he/she/it means by stating that the article Fails to meet criteria for a music article on the talk page. If you can provide an explanation to help others improve the page, I encourage you to do so. --DerRichter (talk) 07:03, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

I still have received no response from you, JBsupreme, or hoponpop59 about the reasoning here- was it a mistake that you seconded it for deletion? Thanks --DerRichter (talk) 19:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi JB

Thanks for the nice welcome back message. Let me know if I can assist you with anything, and I will try. Happy editing! Dave --David Shankbone 15:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy db-repost

Hi JB. Just double-checking that I was not missing something with this... The latest AfD was "no consensus", was it not? Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

...that is correct, sorry about that. Never mind.  :-/ JBsupreme (talk) 03:30, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Lupe Fiasco

Hiya JB! You recently undid some edits to the article on Lupe Fiasco. For the majority what you did was right (like the Influece section, that was just ridiculous), but along with it you also took out some minor constructive edits. I've incorporated your edits into my latest revision. Kind regards, --Soetermans | is listening | what he'd do now? 14:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

RFC: Clarifying "notable single"

As a frequent contributor to articles related to music, you are invited to review this RfC and comment, if you see fit! Best regards, --Winger84 (talk) 18:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Edit summaries for PROD nominations

Just a friendly reminder to use an edit summary when proposing deletion for an article. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{prod}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Daddy X page

i want to thank you for deleting all the information on his page. i think there where just to much personal information on his page that people don't need to know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfpachomie (talk • contribs) 18:34, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Jha Jha

You might want to check out the other members of The Diplomats as well. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 00:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

• Try DRV. I have no idea how Jha Jha was kept either. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 02:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD setups

Hi JB. I've mentioned this to you several times before, but I will remind you again. Please be sure to follow all the steps at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion when you nominate an article. I fixed this one for you. Thanks. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

CSD Taggings

Hello, when marking pages for speedy deletion, please be sure to use proper criteria. "uploader has a NASTY HISTORY of uploading images with FAKE LICENSES!!!" is not a valid reason to delete something and could constitute a personal attack. If you notice a user is repeatedly uploading images without copyright information, give them a warning to inform them of the situation, and contact an administrator if the situation continues. For more information on how to tag these photos, please see WP:IFD. Thank you. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:25, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

I suggest you check their upload history first. I would also counter that it damn well is a valid reason to speedy delete something. If you don't like it, sorry. JBsupreme (talk) 02:26, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

PeanutButterWiki Deletion Vote

Hi. I noticed you voted for the deletion of the PeanutButterWiki article, claiming that there were "hundreds of other wiki farms just like it", but I'm not sure you'd find this statement to be true if you had researched it. I would challenge you two find one that hosts more private wikis (over 300,000 are hosted at PBwiki) and as far as we're aware, only one provider (WetPaint) hosts more wikis (we host ~600,000 wikis, WetPaint just crossed 1m last month). We're prominently cited in a Newsweek article this week alone and have been dozens of major press publications. So I'd like to ask you to please ensure that votes you place for articles for deletion contain factually correct statements. And yes, I am the founder and chairman of PBwiki, Inc. Dweekly (talk) 08:06, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your message! JBsupreme (talk) 08:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Misuse of associated acts

The only way this can be done is manually, unfortunately. I doubt there can be a bot delicate enough to know who belongs in the associated acts section. Just abide by the template and clear out the section whenever it needs to be. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 05:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Lackthereof

Re: Proding of Lackthereof - you might as well grab all of that band's albums while you are at it. They are listed among the articles that link to the Lackthereof article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lackthereof

You didn't provide a reason in this deletion discussion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 11:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Yeah -- my internet dropped before I could provide rationale and add it to the daily page.  :-/ JBsupreme (talk) 14:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Lady Luck (rapper)

Could you check out the AfD on this you started? The article has been improved. Thanks, Hobit (talk) 03:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Prods

Howdy. FYI, if an article is tagged with {{prod}} and it is then contested, you aren't supposed the tag the article with {{prod}} a 2nd time.--Rockfang (talk) 05:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm aware of that. Can you please tell me where I made this mistake? I will list it on AFD as appropriate. Thanks! JBsupreme (talk) 06:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Here and then again here.--Rockfang (talk) 07:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD protocol

Hi JBsupreme. When you nominate an article for AfD, it is important that you follow the steps at WP:Afd#How to list pages for deletion. You did not provide the necessary summary for ILLmacuLate, so I have taken care of that with a dummy edit here. I note that this is now the fifth time I have come to your page asking you to follow those instructions, and I have not been the only one. I am asking you once again: please follow the protocols of our deletion policies if you wish to continue to nominate articles for Prod or AfD. Thank you. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Thalía

Dear JBsupreme,

You deleted a section that I added to this article, could you please give a reason for it? I just wrote down what many people think and say, something that I think belongs to the truth. Now I've put it back, but if you think you can delete it, but please give a reason. Thank you. --El Mexicano (talk) 10:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Citing references/sources for the Thalia Biography and Artistic Career

Rocksky (talk) 21:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)RockskyRocksky (talk) 21:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Hello JBsupreme,

I have given many references or sources for both the Biography and Artistic Career section of Thalia page. See sources below the page. Thank you.

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the false block added to my userpage. DiverseMentality^(Boo!) 21:00, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page

JBSupreme -- as it says, thanks for reverting Lopezmexican's bizarre "you have been blocked" addition to my user page. No clue why he chose me... -- dcclark (talk) 21:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Deletion?

Hello JBSupreme, I am new to the whole wikipedia website and would like to know why is my article in the process of being deleted and is there anything I can do to prevent it from being deleted. All the information and citations are very valid and from well credited sources. (HipHopDoc (talk) 18:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC))

Layzie Bone

Hello. I am providing a WP:3O on Layzie Bone. Please do not make any edits for today. Contrary to stated belief on the talk page; I have been able to vastly expand the article, with correct verification and reliable sources. The person is clearly notable and passes WP:MUSIC. I agree that the article was poorly written, but have significantly improved it to meet our guidelines here at Wikipedia. Please do not continue to engage in edit warring on this article, I'll have it in place within two hours. Thank you, have a nice day! fr33kman -s- 18:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I am now finished with the article. It clearly meets WP:N and passes WP:V. Please be constructive and expand the article rather than impose you WP:POV on it. If you simply revert it or redirect it without seeking community consensus, you will be reported immediately. Thank you and Happy Editing! :-) fr33kman -s- 21:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Layzie Bone. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Consensus is how Wikipedia works, make your case on the talk page, don't just unilaterally redirect when you know it is controversial please. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Chaundon

Hello, JBsupreme ... I'd like a 2nd opinion on this article:

• Chaundon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The PROD-2 was contested ... do you think it's worth the hassle of an AfD?

Happy Editing! — 72.75.82.202 (talk · contribs) _{20:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC)}

 Done … article has been rescued by Some Other Editors. :-) — 72.75.82.202 (talk) 21:40, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

User:Tylerdotcom13

Given that all of the stuff had taken place today within a 2 hour period, I tended to give the benefit of the doubt. I've watched the user page, and if there's one more warning after the 48 hours, I'll make it permanent. Thanks for keepin' an eye out :) SkierRMH (talk) 07:16, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

My dog

Well,since he was a Beagle,and was sad being cooped up in our apartment,we gave him to a hunter.In fact,he's going hunting today :D --Fireaxe888 (talk) 09:24, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD

Since you've taken an interest in gang articles, I was wondering if you'd take a look at this AfD? [[1]] Niteshift36 (talk) 13:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Re. Proposed deletion of Bossman

I have deprodded this. firstly, the prod was invalid since the article has survived a previous AfD (as noted on the article's talk page). An allmusic bio and other coverage was easy to find. Please take the effort to look for sources to determine notability and improve articles before trying to delete them. Thanks.--Michig (talk) 19:05, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Edit summary usage

JBsupreme, you need to start using edit summaries; you barely ever use them at all. This is especially important when you are nominating articles for deletion, such as here, just now; it is time-consuming and annoying to have to check every single one of your edits to see what you've done, especially since you tend to make large-scale changes in one edits; large trims or additions of PRODs or AfDs. I realize that you'll probably just remove this message as you have all the others, but your lack of edit summary usage of any kind, even just to say "trim" or "AfD", is testing the patience of many members of the community. Thanks. GlassCobra 16:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm trying to make it a habit to mention the article is pending deletion, if I overlook this please feel free to add a null edit summary on my behalf and point it out to me when I forget. Thanks. JBsupreme (talk) 23:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Improperly sourced edits

Am I within my right to remove improperly sourced edits from a BLP-related article? I formally stated my objection on the talk page of the offending article, and explained in detail to the offending user (JJJ999) why his changes violate WP:VERIFY and WP:NPOV. Following a request for comment, a neutral editor (DGG) also voiced concern that the material is improperly sourced. User JJJ999 seems to beleive that editors are not allowed to undo his changes, and that they must correct the offending material for him instead, even though I believe it is low quality and beyond repair. Dynablaster (talk) 17:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Without looking at the article in question, the answer in general is a resounding yes. The burden of proof is on whoever added (or restored) the unsourced edits. JBsupreme (talk) 04:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Yo Majesty

Please check out my work on Yo Majesty. I think it's heavily cited enough now that I removed the references needed template. Hope you agree.--Larrybob (talk) 20:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Agree. JBsupreme (talk) 03:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Criminal organizations list

First thing's first, good work cleaning up that article, getting rid of some of the more pointless stuff on there (wannabe gangbangers trying to rep their "set"). I have to say though I disagree with your removal of the Piromalli 'ndrina (a sourced article) and some of the yakuza clans. Dojin-kai and Goto-gumi are both sourced (I haven't bothered to check the rest, if they aren't sourced I'm sure they can be). Nicknackrussian (talk) 15:21, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Feel free to restore anything that is sourced, although I did not see the sources you're referring to when I was cleaning them up. JBsupreme (talk) 17:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

I've restored the Piromalli 'ndrina (since it was already extensively referenced in-article) and yakuza articles, about half or so of which I've managed to provide in-article references for. The other half, well that's work for another day. Give me a shout if you disagree. Nicknackrussian (talk) 23:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

$100

No bet Dlohcierekim 07:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

LOL JBsupreme (talk) 07:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

The sock block

Hm, this does appear to be a bit off IMO. First off, there is not a whole lot (behavioral wise) to link any of the accounts to JBsupreme. And second, I am not even sure why they were blocked in the first place. None of them have any prior blocks, are indef blocked accounts, and they all see to be well intentioned. I am going to leave a note for the blocking admin, and try and contact the CheckUser in this case. Please bear with us. Tiptoety ^talk 05:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I confirm Rlevse's CheckUser results. However, I don't believe there's any evidence of abusive sockpuppetry here. This does appear a bit strange, though. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 07:06, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

JBsupreme, do you have anyone else (wife/kids/roommates) in your household that also edits on Wikipedia? You need to provide strong evidences because your IP returns 4 other accounts, which is a lot of accounts under same IP for a single household unless you're living in university's residence. I shall review my decision when you present your evidences. And if you do get unblocked, you should make an advance declaration on each user page in the same household, per WP:SHARE OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 13:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

←I am very disappointed in the way this was handled. For starters myself and Nishkid both have stated that there really is no evidence of abusive sockpuppetry and yet this account remains blocked. I know plenty of administrators and users who have created multiple sock-accounts in good faith, and choose not to use them disruptively. Just because a user has sock accounts does not mean they have violated the sockpuppetry policy. Second, I am disapointed that the blocking admin reviewed and declined the unblock request which clearly violates the appeal policy. Ohana, I wish to avoid any unnecessary drama so I ask that you please unblock the account, with a rather forgiving unblock summary so that this does not mess up anything in the future for this user. (Also per WP:SOCK, users do not have to disclose sock accounts if they are operating in good faith, it is only recommended.) Tiptoety ^talk 15:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Declination rejected. Reviewing one's own blocks is flagrant administrative misconduct from both the lens of community norms and policy; this was an obvious error that needed immediate rectification. There is no abusive sockpuppetry going on here, if any, and it is patently unfair to hold a good editor's privileges hostage until they reveal details about their living situation. To JBsupreme: this sequence of edits is quite strange... if you are in fact Urgblame, be aware that you've been nailed and that breaching experiments such as reverting your own unconstructive edits are unwelcome. I've unblocked you already, so happy editing and stay out of trouble. :-) east718 // talk // email // 17:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Looks like a good course of action to me. Tiptoety ^talk 19:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Unless there is something I've missed. I concur with the unblock, at least of this account. This looks like a productive, contributing editor to me. If abusive sockpuppetry was afoot, hopefully some learning has occurred, and we won't see a repeat. If a block is needed, I would suggest discussion at WP:AN/I before implementing it. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 19:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I didn't initiated the RFCU myself. Someone else was also supicious about JBsupreme's behaviour. Furthermore, if he created these accounts in good faith, there's no harm done in disclosing and nothing to hide, right? He still hasn't answered why the IPs are related. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 19:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I actually initiated the RCU because of what looked like tagteaming on the Bowler hat article by JBsupreme and a mysterious user:NajiimP who appeared out of nowhere to support JB's deletionism. Turns out both had muliple accounts, but no connection between them. I didn't see any sock-abuse either in JB's case (just a bunch of add alternate and little-used accounts) and so didn't request any action. I see that NajiimP has been nailed for 3-sock editing of a single article, and that's just as well, because I think he's been around WP even more than all his accounts and edits-together, suggest. JBsupreme appears a good-faith editor, albeit one who has an infuriating habit of making large deletions with in-your-face edit summaries. I'm glad to see his unblock and hope he goes on to contribute here at little less boldly when it comes to deletions, and with a little more use of article TALK pages. (hint). And JB, my apologies. To some extent if you were experimenting with alternate or ill-remembered accounts, or somebody else was with your computer, you sort of got caught in the crossfire. SBHarris 01:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Than k you. JBsupreme (talk) 06:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to have been unclear

When I wrote this I should have been more clear in that it was 37 strong and cogent opinions toward keeping and 30 strong and cogent opinions toward deletion. Not a vote. An effort at reaching consensus. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Gangland (TV series)

I reverted your unexplained edit to Gangland (TV series) the result of which was simply to mess up the table. Also in reviewing your edit history, you have a habit of not using the edit summary, making many of your edit very suspect. Please note that unexplained edits with no apparent reason can be reverted as vandalism. It would greatly help other editors to understand what you are doing if you made use of the edit summary to explain why you are deleting a link or any other edit that is not self evident as to why the edit is being made. Thank you Dbiel ^(Talk) 19:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Jak3m

I warned him about this specifically ... he hasn't been blocked in over a year and despite all the image notices, he hasn't been formally warned as policy requires. If he does it after this, he can be blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 01:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Unsourced dates of birth

Hi JBsupreme. Regarding this edit: Unsourced dates of birth are typically not removed from BLPs unless there is some reason to believe they are incorrect. Was there a reason in this case? Or it could be that there is something in WP:BLP that I am missing or understanding differently. Thanks in advance for any clarification. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 17:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

If you have a source please reinstate it. I've seen many instances where we are perpetuating wrong dates of birth and this makes Wikipedia look unreliable. This problem specifically affects hip-hop biographies to a greater degree. Hope that helps you. JBsupreme (talk) 18:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, yes it does. I had not realized that this had been a problem with hip-hop biographies. IMDB lists Rocsi's date of birth as agreeing with Wikipedia, but IMDB is not a reliable source. I've just found a 2005 article in the Chicago Tribune which says, "she refuses to give her exact age", so it's probably best to leave it out of her biography here. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 18:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Masters of Destruction

FYI, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masters of Destruction (2nd nomination). ·:· Will Beback ·:· 00:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, left a note. JBsupreme (talk) 05:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Cum shot

Just wondering why you removed the topics in the 'See also' section? They are closely linked.

Horoshi1820 (talk) 17:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

I explained why in my edit summary. If they are closely linked then you can link to them within the body of the article using prose and wiki links. JBsupreme (talk) 17:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Question

(removed non-free image which was disruptively uploaded to commons)

what was disruptive about uploading this image to commons?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lil_Wayne.jpg

Ohthislife (talk) 06:21, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

fake licensing dude. JBsupreme (talk) 06:30, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

I am the author. I own the copyright. What is fake about this? Ohthislife (talk) 07:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for confirming this with OTRS helpdesk. JBsupreme (talk) 21:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Will be kind enough to place it back up please? Ohthislife (talk) 01:41, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

List of fictional governments

For your attention, a recent AFD you were involved in has gone up for a deletion review here. Ryan4314 (talk) 21:10, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

		Merry Christmas!
		DiverseMentality is wishing you a Merry Christmas! Hope you have a great Christmas day and a happy holiday season. Stay safe! DiverseMentality 08:39, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Rojas (2nd nomination)

My apologies. I assumed that a proposed deletion would count as a previous nomination, and therefore I used the afd2 template. Thank you for adjusting. Delaque (talk) 08:59, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

You got it. JBsupreme (talk) 22:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Article on Miss Pooja

Hi, Thanks for keeping an eye on this article. You reverted my contribution to this article, by saying that these contain unreliable sources. Please reconsider it, as i added the content and links by carefully searching the info and strongly feel that these were reliable sources. If you feel this is not the case, Please tell me how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources. Quality check 15:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Yaki Kadafi

Deleting blatantly unsourced content is good and all, however, you might wanna get in the habit of removing following categories too. I have saved you the bother this time, but I won't always be sorting through categories. Is it possible that you've done this "mistake" on other articles? Please reply on your talk page, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

You are the yin to my yang. JBsupreme (talk) 22:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

You mean that in a good way? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

I think so!  :) JBsupreme (talk) 04:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

~

lindsay lohan

what about the already existing screenshots of lohan in parent trap and antother world Anywhere But Home (talk) 16:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

and what about christian bale's article......he has a picture of him in the movie Equilibrium.....and anothe one in the movie The Machinist .......and he is a living person......why is it ok for his article and not for lohans.......Anywhere But Home (talk) 16:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

if u dont reply i have no choice but to revert........Anywhere But Home (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

congratulations on your second block this month JBsupreme (talk) 05:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

deletes

were you implying at the Jackley Budden afd that for the dozen or so other articles today & yesterday where I've said delete, that you want to keep them? (smile)DGG (talk) 22:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for Bezgovo cvrtje

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Bezgovo cvrtje. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

debby gibson

why did you take off the link for videos? all the websites has ads and affiliated links. Its very disrespecting to the small website owners. You start a website put any content and promote it then you will know the pain. No we don't do that we just destroy the other website by deleting the external links for no reason and help the greedy corporate world. If you want to remove that link you should delete all the website that has ads and any other affiliate links. Debby Gibson is not popular like Britney spears . so im trying to spread the word for the artists i like. and you guys keep deleting if they are not popular. there is cnn.com, imbd.com and many other links that has ads. why don't you remove them? so wiki runs this website with their own money? they get donations from other websites. Where do they get these donations? from all of us its a team work we are like a family. so don't delete the link. its extremely unfair. If you invest some money and run something then you will know what it feel likes and what a business is. Ediing something on wiki that you may have no idea is not appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jag666 (talk • contribs) 13:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

WP:EL JBsupreme (talk) 14:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

spam??

How can you say its spam? you allow webpages that has cookies ans steel your information. Its very ridiculous. I didn't do anything that to get blocked. In case if you want to do it tell them to block me. People don't come to your site. You don't have genuine reason to remove the links i posted. You can put myspace, youtube , IMDB and many sites. Im telling you one more time everyone runs their websites with affliate ads. No one runs with their own money. Im a promoter for indie artists and many artists know me. don't let teh bad word spread that your going against small websites and indie artists. They will come and complaint on your editors .

Jag666 (talk) 17:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Anne Frank

Are you not supposed to wikilink terms that are part of quotes? I still don't know everything. Belasted (talk) 20:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Bushwick Bill

The interview was conducted in Hazlehurst, MS and is not posted on the internet. What do I need to do in order to have this published. The information brings up to date the biographical information of the artist. TraceySoup —Preceding unsigned comment added by Traceysoup (talk • contribs) 02:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Well it needs to be published somewhere, otherwise it isn't really verifiable. Can you read WP:RS for me and make your best judgement on whether the source you're referring to is actually "reliable" ? JBsupreme (talk) 07:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kawran_Bazar

Would you please reconsider based on addition of references and content? --Ragib (talk) 18:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Cake decorating

Hi JB. I see you did some cleaning up on this article. For the content removed in this edit [2] though, I didn't understand how the change improved the article. The content needs better citations, but seem to be pretty valuable. Am I missing something? ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes you're missing sources which corroborate what is being written! Fix that please, if you can. We can't keep unverifiable content around forever, sorry. JBsupreme (talk) 06:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Did you try looking for sources? You might try Google News and Google Books. Those are two good places to find citations. ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes I did. I did not find sources that specifically corroborated this content. Did you? JBsupreme (talk) 16:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Back to the Future: The Ride

Please do not remove images, especially images of the attraction's exterior, without explanation. If you have a problem with the image, please begin a discussion on the talk page for the article before reverting it.--Snowman Guy (talk) 16:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

You already have a message on your talk page. You are violating copyright and our fair use policy. Stop doing that. Stat. JBsupreme (talk) 16:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

No, my message concerned the potential deletion of the image, yet images on articles (even tagged ones) should not been removed unlkess a valid reason is given on the talk page. Once the image is deleted, it will be safe to delte it from the article seeing how there is no longer an image there.

Also, you may have violated Wikipedia:Civility with multiple editors in that you have been impolite to them. Please do not breach this.--Snowman Guy (talk) 16:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Stop stealing images. Thanks. "The website is down" doesn't mean we have permission to violate their copyright. JBsupreme (talk) 16:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but the ride which the image displays has been closed for two years, and cannot be replaced with a free variant.--Snowman Guy (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

In response to your edit summary comment, it is not an opinion; read this article: http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/03/america/NA-GEN-US-Theme-Park-Ride.php --Snowman Guy (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Les Henderson

An article that you have been involved in editing, Les Henderson, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Henderson (2nd nomination). Thank you. --WeatherFug (talk) 23:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Rand Paul

Rand Paul has been overhauled. This may affect your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rand Paul. This message is being copied to 8 people. JJB 07:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alésia Glidewell

Please expand your nomination reasoning per my comments on the AFD. On second thought they seem a bit harshly worded, but I'm confident your skin is thick enough to take it. Apologies anyway. I'll be happy to retract the comment once the issue has been resolved. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries

I won't belabor a point that has, I see, been made before, but I am compelled to note that even if one doesn't care to use edit summaries generally, he should at least use them when affixing an XfD template to a page (see, e.g., Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion). 68.249.0.104 (talk) 20:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article United Bamboo Gang has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. - Kingpin13 (talk) 08:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

sock

Hey JB. re: this. You have anything in lines of a discussion, consensus, policy, RfC or anything that would somehow equate dab to self-reference? I looked and didn't see anything, but if you're familiar with how and why a disambiguation would be a self-reference I'd like to read up on that. Not trying to argue at all here .. just curious. — Ched :  ?  16:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes I do. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SELFREF#Community_and_website_feature_references -- Hope this helps, its a fairly old rule of thumb. Think of it in terms of derivative works. It is a good idea to avoid wiki-linking beyond article namespace within an article. I am just one person though so if you want broader input perhaps bring it up on the Village Pump or Admin Noticeboard? JBsupreme (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

I thank you sir. (assumed gender .. lol). I'll read through that, seems like a good start. I asked JHunterJ for input too, he seems to be pretty active in the dab area. I'm not really looking to start any major discussion on it, just kind of looking around and trying to get a feel for what is and isn't right for dab. Appreciate your time, and have a good day/night ;) — Ched :  ?  17:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

WP:ANI

There is currently a thread on WP:ANI concerning your edit summaries found here. — Σxplicit 20:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries again

JBsupreme, the rough consensus at the thread on ANI is that your edit summaries are still not acceptable. They've improved considerably in the past month or so, but they're still laced with gratuitous profanity [3] [4] in some cases explicitly directed at others [5] [6] [7], even if not directly describing them, as was problematic before. Really the problem is not profanity per se as much as it is incivility, but the former contributes to the latter.

Given the tepid response of admins at ANI, I hesitate to say that you'll be blocked if this issue continues at its current level. So, my suggestions are two-fold. First, despite the messages above, not using any edit summaries would be the lesser of two evils (it's rarely disruptive to leave it blank, although it's a bit discourteous). If you can't resist cursing in edit summaries or typing them aggressively in all caps, then just don't use them! If you can write them more neutrally, then all the better. Second, if you need page protection, go to WP:RFPP to request it. That will work better than asking for it in edit summaries.

Something that went unsaid at ANI is that many of your edits (including those at issue) are enforcing the WP:BLP policy. That is hugely important and we need all the help we can get with BLPs. I understand that the poor sourcing and intentional defamation can be frustrating to deal with. I encourage you to work with others on the BLP Noticeboard or to contact me directly on my talk page to get some help with difficult BLPs. A helping hand, especially one with admin tools, could make it easier.--chaser - t 05:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Andy Samberg article

Why do you have keep deleting the impressions section of the Andy Samberg article? It is useful information that is properly cited, and an impressions list are fixtures of other SNL cast members' pages, such as Bill Hader and Darrell Hammond Nobody else has any problem with that addition, and I would note that there are numerous complaints of your unnecessary deletion of articles and sections of articles in this talk page. And quoting from WP: Other stuff exists article in response to your last reason for deletion,

In an article's deletion debate, an editor unfamiliar with guidelines may vote to keep an article solely because articles similar to it exist. Another contributor may respond simply by saying that just because other stuff exists does not mean that the article in question should be kept. While perhaps a legitimate response, the automatic dismissal of such a statement is just as lacking in rationale and thus the second user has provided no reason to delete the article.

Angry, Purplebackpack89 (talk) 20:57, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

You are adding tons of unsourced trivia. Your WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument holds no water. I cannot stress this enough. It is a list of trivia. It does not use prose. It does not cite THIRD PARTY PUBLICATIONS which would show evidence of its specific notability. It is original research. Get it? Good. JBsupreme (talk) 20:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

P.S. Please stop confusing Wikipedia as a fansite. It is not intended to be one. JBsupreme (talk) 21:00, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

If my WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS holds no water, neither does your WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, per my quote. I would note that it does cite a source. Your attack borders on vandalism. And where did anything about fan pages come up? Purplebackpack89 (talk) 21:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Wait a minute...you just deleted the Bill Hader impressions--something NOBODY ELSE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD had a problem with--just to deflate my argument. You are using Wikipedia as your own personal power tripPurplebackpack89 (talk) 21:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Wrong. You are using Wikipedia as a fansite and a dumping grounds for trivial data. Stop it. Please. JBsupreme (talk) 21:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

A) I didn't put the Bill Hader impressions there, only the Samberg one, which I see you deleted again without the edit summaries everybody on your talk page begs you to write B) You act like you're God. You're not. The Hader impressions page had been there for months, then you go around deleting and ruining stuff for EVERYBODY ON WIKIPEDIA. I feel like reporting you. I know I'm a snark, but you've peeved me Purplebackpack89 (talk) 06:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Dude. Why do have this feeling you are stalking my every move? By the way, I would note that I am not the only one displeased by your deletions Purplebackpack89 (talk) 03:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Try not to make personal attacks which violate WP:NPA policy and I won't have to remove them. Its unfortunate that some people are displeased with my "deletions" as you put it, but fanboys and fangirls are inevitably bound to be displeased when trivial and unsourced information is removed against their wishes. I think I've over-explained this situation to you in several different forums by now. Feel free to respond to any one of them. JBsupreme (talk) 03:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Dude, it's like you check those articles every five minutes. And this is hypocritical; you've accused me of being a fanboy 5-6xPurplebackpack89 (talk) 06:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Paul "Coy" Allen

I just did a bit of an overhaul on this article. I don't have the time or desire to work on it any further, but I improved the tone and style of the article. Cleaned it up quite a bit. I thought that, perhaps, considering your areas of focus, you may be interested in working on this article, getting the information referenced and balancing the tone. If not, disregard this. لennavecia 20:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Necro

Why do you keep on un-doing my contributions to the Necro page? The acting info is all true as its listed on Necro aka Ron Braunstein's myspace page, go check: www.myspace.com/ronbraunstein1 maybe you didnt know, now you know, he acts now, and he has been making announcments to the fans about it through myspace as far as the touring, its evident he is on Rock The Bells, go check their website their is 100 articles stating Necro is on the tour, and if you check youtube, their is proof of Necro performing all over the world, in every country so I dont understand why you are editing what I added can you please stop because you are wasting my precious time everytime you do that thank you Knowledgeofself777 (talk) 05:02, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

This guy has a history of deleting large portions of articles for inexplicable reasons, as numerous talk posts point out. You should report him for this. I did Purplebackpack89 (talk) 18:10, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Myspace should never be used as a source in this encyclopedia. Full stop. JBsupreme (talk) 03:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Who are you to decide that myspace should never be used as a source? I happen to know that it's Necro aka Ron Braunstein's page, and the info is correct You seem to be a on a power control kick, but you should really stay away from Necro's page, because you have nothing to contribute, all you do is erase things, get a life man I am gonna keep un-doing what you keep messing with, so if you wanna play that game fine but I have a right to add relevant information as much as you, not that you add anything, you just mess with other people's add ons, stop being annoying PLEASE! Knowledgeofself777 (talk) 06:00, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

He's right as far as WP:SELFPUB goes. But I haven't looked at the article, so Knowledgeofself777 should not take that as any kind of endorsement of whatever he's doing. Oh, and repeatedly undoing somebody's removal of negative unsourced material is the fastest way to earn yourself a 3RR block. I'll come back and look at this tomorrow when I have more time. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.--chaser - t 02:23, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

[8]. Cheers.--chaser - t 21:55, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

FYI

Hello, JBsupreme. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. PhilKnight (talk) 18:49, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. I know I have been curt in the past, but beyond that I think this is a matter which may need some sort of dispute resolution, as mentioned on the noticeboard. What steps should I take if that is indeed necessary? JBsupreme (talk) 01:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Blog?

Can you read the non-English portions of http://dactrung.net/baiviet/noidung.aspx?BaiID=4bQIsJnb4X9da02SdaBlKw%3d%3d ? --Ronz (talk) 01:42, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Invisible pink unicorn

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Invisible_Pink_Unicorn&action=history I just thought it was strange to have an external links label, with no external links. I went through the history, and found there used to be quite a few. So I just had a quick look through the links. They seemed fairly relevant, so I copy and pasted them back in. That's all. -OOPSIE- (talk) 05:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:911ct supporters

Template:911ct supporters has been nominated for deletion by Ice Cold Beer. As this TfD nomination includes objections to the same list of people that is currently in use in Template:911ct, I am inviting you to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. (I am sending this message to you as a current or former editor of Alex Jones (radio host), following the guideline on multiple messages.) Regards —  Cs32en  08:47, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

There may be hope for us yet

Check out this discussion. Why it even got closed is bizarre, but the AFD is going again. Cheers.--chaser (talk) 03:46, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Stop adding people to Muslim categories

Ok, I understand. But can I keep categorizing if there are any reliable sources to claim this? DaDopeboy (talk) 20:30, 6 May 2009 (JST)

Ok. I appreciate your announcement. DaDopeboy (talk) 1:17, 7 May 2009 (JST)

Protection and vandalism reports

Again, this isn't going to get the article semi-protected. Ask for protection at WP:RFPP and ask to get vandals blocked at WP:AIV. That'll be faster and cause less stress.--chaser (talk) 16:11, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Your Edit Summary on Knowledgeofself777

I realize that it is frustrating having any of your userspace vandalized as mine has been vandalized before, but I just wanted to comment that your edit summary on Knowledgeofself777 made me laugh out loud and for that I thank you. :) Cheers, --ThoseStarsBurnLikeDiamonds stargaze 07:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks ThoseStarsBurnLikeDiamonds, its a little frustrating when someone doesn't get the message and keeps reinserting WP:BLP violations. I haven't had that much to drink tonight so I'm doing my best to hold back and maintain.  :-/ JBsupreme (talk) 07:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Understandable, but you're doing a good job. Just keep on truckin' and enjoy this glass of whisky!  :) Cheers, --ThoseStarsBurnLikeDiamonds stargaze 07:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

ANI

Hello, JBsupreme. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi there. Regarding Khia's "My Neck, My Back"...

Hello. So I just saw that you reverted my last edit to the "Early Controversy" section, as my edit deleted the unreferenced section tag you added and instead I replaced it with a source. The source I replaced your tag with simply redirected to the charts section of the article. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm assuming the reason why you added the tag to begin with is because none of the chart positions in that section were sourced? However they are sourced, just not in that section, but rather, in the chart section itself. If you were adding the 'unreferenced section' tag because of another part of that section, it's best to add a "" tag to the content in question instead. Thanks. Percxyz (Call me Percy, it's easier) 19:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

No it is not best to add a fact tag. I'm not sure where you ever heard that. Jimbo Wales disagrees. JBsupreme (talk) 19:55, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Also, why are you citing a diff? Do not cite another Wikipedia article as a source, and definitely do not cite a diff. If you have a valid source for something, just cite the actual source. JBsupreme (talk) 19:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

No no, I didn't cite another article, nor did I cite a diff. I cited the charts section within the same article. I figured that since you felt the need to add an unreferenced section tag, I'd take it out and, instead of re-adding the sources from the charts section, add one source that leads to the chart section itself. Either way, I ended up citing the chart positions within the Early Controversy (now Backgrond) section without citing the article itself, so I hope that clears it up. Percxyz (Call me Percy, it's easier) 21:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

That's more like it, thanks Percyxz. JBsupreme (talk) 23:22, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Dwele

I was wondering if I can quote the artist himself on his birthday without you deleting it. Thanks skiguy06880 15:45, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

In short, no you cannot. JBsupreme (talk) 16:43, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

By the way, celebrities/musicians/actors lie about their age all the time. So do the people who handle their publicity, for various reasons. Please find and cite a trusted and reliable source (in the form of an unrelated third party publication) or don't mention it at all. JBsupreme (talk) 16:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Necro (rapper)

I've protected the article indefinitely to end the edit war. Please discuss any disputes on the article's talk page. I realize Knowledgeofself has been less than cooperative, but I will take that into account if he doesn't attempt to amicably resolve this. Oh, and please let me know if you see any outstanding BLP issues on the page. I will remove them quickly or you can drop a note at ANI.--chaser (talk) 12:49, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

FYI

Deletion of Bilateral relation pages despite ongoing merging effort Ed Fitzgerald _{t / c} 08:30, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Maravilla

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Maravilla. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maravilla (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:41, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Maino

Did you delete most of the information on the Maino page because it was sourced mostly by his personal site? I did this mainly because of the fact that there are not many other "reliable sources of information". I do realize that this does not excuse the article from meeting the wikipedia standards, but perhaps you could contact me with some possible reliable information sources that I could extract data from. Any help is appreciated. DroKIDCASH (talk) 01:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)DroKIDCASH

Steppin: The Movie

I just did a quick copyedit at the article. While it still needs to be adequately sourced, I think with respects, a withdrawal may be in order to allow it to further be improved. The cast alone shows its gonna get coverage, as it was finally released only 8 days ago. I was able to cite it being the both the directorial debut and last film for Michael Taliferro. It might be best to see where this one goes. Maybe? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

OTOH, I also added my opinion over at the AFD, with a very different conclusion. There's no proof this film was ever actually released. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 03:55, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

IP

I unblocked the IP 73.93.78.209 because amid all the vandalism there was a single sincere and productive editor who was trying hard. The unblock let him register an account, and I hope he will become an asset to Wikipedia. I will be happy to schoolblock the IP now that that's done: there's no need to shout. It's a useful reminder that IP blocks can prevent both the good and the bad from editing. Acroterion _(talk) 22:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

I particularly like the edit summary the 99% left us earlier today: "EXCUSE ME I'M A GENEOUS." You can't make that stuff up. Acroterion _(talk) 22:25, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

:-) JBsupreme (talk) 22:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Red Bull Cola

"Lets be careful with what we add to the Red Bull Cola article. Every report I've read so far (and yes, I've read them all quite thoroughly) seems to contradict itself or say that the ingredients used by Red Bull are de-cocainized. There is no WP:DEADLINE here so lets wait until this has been fact checked by another reliable agency before we go around proclaiming Red Bull has cocaine in it, trace amounts or not. There are legal issues here at stake and there is no reason to intentionally cause harm to the reputation of Red Bull or put Wikipedia in any type of danger. Is there? JBsupreme (talk) 00:49, 28 May 2009 (UTC)"

Every article I've read says .4 microns. I don't care about the Red Bull corporation. They won't sue us for reporting a fact, just like they haven't sued any major news corporations. Do you know how I know there's cocaine in it? It's being banned for having cocaine in it.

The information stays up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PÆonU (talk • contribs) 01:01, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

And yet it is still on the shelves right this very minute everywhere else. LOL. You should not be allowed to edit Wikipedia. JBsupreme (talk) 04:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

I have blocked KiddFann

I noticed his most recent funky edit and decided to check out his contributions. Every one of them is some sort of date-changing or number-changing vandalism except for a few that are a slightly different kind of vandalism (e.g. to Hallmark Channel). Thanks for your vigilant vandal-fighting. --Richard (talk) 01:04, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

West Coast hip hop

Sorry about the West Coast hip hop edit. I just noticed that the previous version which had numerous amounts of information had been replaced by 3 sentences. Can we get some more information on the West Coast page including stylistic attributes including origins and ties to East Coast? Thanks. Gobberpooper (talk) 04:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

We sure can! But we need to cite sources for any content we add. WP:CITE Wikipedia has a strict policy which prohibits original research WP:NOR. So long as it is verifiable through a reliable third party publication, lets go ahead! JBsupreme (talk) 06:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

A favour?

Could you possibly help me? I can't revert an edit on the Bill Verna article due to WP:3RR. I noticed that you saw what I saw about reliable publications. Look at the history and you'll see what I mean. And look out. The user who is reverting me has a habit of issuing arbitrary warnings first (which I've taken to ANI just FYI). TaintedZebra (talk) 06:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)