Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→User-reported: as legit as {{u|Bishzilla}} |
→User-reported: nope |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*{{user-uaa|1=MPantsTempAccount}} – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Possibly impersonating {{u|MjolnirPants}}? I see no proof that this is a legit sock. <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:copperplate gothic;">[[User:Chris troutman|<span style="color:#345">Chris Troutman</span>]] ([[User talk:Chris troutman|<span style="color:#345">talk</span>]])</span></span> 13:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
*{{user-uaa|1=MPantsTempAccount}} – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Possibly impersonating {{u|MjolnirPants}}? I see no proof that this is a legit sock. <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:copperplate gothic;">[[User:Chris troutman|<span style="color:#345">Chris Troutman</span>]] ([[User talk:Chris troutman|<span style="color:#345">talk</span>]])</span></span> 13:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
*:@[[User:Chris troutman|Chris troutman]], not even with [[Special:Diff/1180804659|this]] for legit sock evidence? [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 14:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
*:@[[User:Chris troutman|Chris troutman]], not even with [[Special:Diff/1180804659|this]] for legit sock evidence? [[User:Robertsky|– robertsky]] ([[User talk:Robertsky|talk]]) 14:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
||
*:{{replyto|Robertsky}} Everything posted there is publicly available and perhaps a clever ploy by an impersonator. MjolnirPants said on his userpage that he scrambled his password, but that's no reason to assume that this new editor is the same person. if MjolnirPants cannot return to his old account, and he try a fresh start. <span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:copperplate gothic;">[[User:Chris troutman|<span style="color:#345">Chris Troutman</span>]] ([[User talk:Chris troutman|<span style="color:#345">talk</span>]])</span></span> 14:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*:I have every reason to believe it's as legit as {{u|Bishzilla}}. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 14:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC). |
*:I have every reason to believe it's as legit as {{u|Bishzilla}}. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|tålk]] 14:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC). |
Revision as of 14:09, 17 April 2024
UAA navigation: |
Usernames for administrator attention |
---|
This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.
|
Note: Patrollers may wish to monitor usernames flagged by filters 54, 148 and 149; private filters 102, 354, 499, 579; and this recent changes filter tag.
This page was last updated at 00:47 on 15 May 2024 (UTC).
if it is out of date.
- ~editor-of-editsandeiting (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Esqueer (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- This username matched "queer" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note on file the use of the word "queer" is not necessarily offensive please consider the context -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abkazia&SouthOssetia&Artsakh (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- MPantsTempAccount (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Possibly impersonating MjolnirPants? I see no proof that this is a legit sock. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Chris troutman, not even with this for legit sock evidence? – robertsky (talk) 14:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Robertsky: Everything posted there is publicly available and perhaps a clever ploy by an impersonator. MjolnirPants said on his userpage that he scrambled his password, but that's no reason to assume that this new editor is the same person. if MjolnirPants cannot return to his old account, and he try a fresh start. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have every reason to believe it's as legit as Bishzilla. Bishonen | tålk 14:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC).