From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the royal dynasty. For the Rajput clan to which this dynasty belonged, see Chandel (Rajput clan).
Chandelas of Jejakabhukti
9th century CE–13th century CE
Map of Asia in 1200 CE. Chandela kingdom is shown in central India.
Capital Khajuraho
Languages Sanskrit
Religion Hinduism
Government Monarchy
 •  c. 831-845 CE Nannuka
 •  c. 1288-1311 CE Hammiravarman
Historical era Classical India
 •  Established 9th century CE
 •  Disestablished 13th century CE
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Delhi Sultanate
Today part of  India

The Chandelas of Jejakabhukti were a Rajput dynasty in Central India. They ruled much of the Bundelkhand region (then called Jejakabhukti) between the 9th and the 13th centuries.

The Chandelas initially ruled as feudatories of the Gurjara-Pratiharas of Kanyakubja (Kannauj). The 10th century Chandela ruler Yashovarman became practically independent, although he continued to acknowledge the Pratihara suzerainty. By the time of his successor Dhanga, the Chandelas had become a sovereign power. Their power rose and decline as they fought battles with the neighbouring dynasties, especially the Paramaras of Malwa and the Kalachuris of Tripuri. From the 11th century onwards, the Chandelas faced raids by the northern Muslim dynasties, including the Ghaznavids and the Ghurids. The Chandela power effectively ended around the beginning of the 13th century, following Chahamana and Ghurid invasions.

The Chandelas are well known for their art and architecture, most notably for the temples at their original capital Khajuraho. They also commissioned a number of temples, water bodies, palaces and forts at other places, including their strongholds of Ajaigarh, Kalinjar and their later capital Mahoba.


The Chandelas are included in the list of 36 Rajput clans in multiple texts, including Varna Ratnakara, Prithviraj Raso and Kumarapala-charita. Like other Rajput dynasties, their origin is obscured by mythical legends.[1]

The epigraphic records of the dynasty, as well as texts such as Balabhadra-vilasa and Prabodha-chandrodaya, claim that the Chandelas belonged to the legendary Lunar dynasty (Chandravansha). Balabhadra-vilasa also names Atri among their ancestors. A Khajuraho inscription describes the Chandela king Dhanga as a member of the Vrishni clan of the Yadavas (who also claimed to be part of the Lunar dynasty).[1]

The legend of Hemavati explains the Lunar ancestry of the Chandelas as follows: Chandravarma was born to Hemavati, daughter of priest (Raj Purohit) Hemraj of Raja Indrajit, the Gaharwar raja of Benares. She was embraced by Moon (som) and Chandra Varma was born to her, she was asked to do the Bhanda Yagnya to wipe the disgrace as she had not married Chandra. He blessed the son with Philosophers stone and taught him Politics. The boy was talented and sharp and brave, at 16 he killed his first Tiger. He was made king of Mahotsava Nagar (Mahoba) and his progeny, called Chandelas ruled there for eternity.[2]

However, the official records of the Chandelas do not mention Hemavati. R. K. Dikshit dismisses such legends as "bardic inventions and imaginations".[3]

According to one theory, the Chandelas were of tribal origin, affiliated to the Gonds. They worshipped Maniya, a tribal goddess, whose temples are located at Mahoba and Maniyagadh.[4]


Early rulers[edit]

The Chandelas were originally vassals of the Gurjara-Pratiharas.[5] Nannuka (r. c. 831-845 CE), the founder of the dynasty, was the ruler of a small kingdom centered around Khajuraho.[6]:22

According to the Chandela inscriptions, Nannuka's successor Vakpati defeated several enemies.[7] Vakpati's sons Jayashakti (Jeja) and Vijayashakti (Vija) consolidated the Chandela power.[8] According to a Mahoba inscription, the Chandela territory was named "Jejakabhukti" after the Jayashakti.[9] Vijayashakti's successor Rahila is credited with several military victories in eulogistic inscriptions.[10] Rahila's son Harsha played an important role in restoring the rule of the Pratihara king Mahipala, possibly after a Rashtrakuta invasion or after Mahiapala's conflict with his step-brother Bhoja II.[11]

Rise as a sovereign power[edit]

Harsha's son Yashovarman (r. c. 925-950 CE) continued to acknowledge the Pratihara suzerainty, but became practically independent.[12] He conquered the important fortress of Kalanjara.[13] A 953-954 CE Khajuraho inscription credits him with several other military successes, including against Gaudas (identified with the Palas), the Khasas, the Chedis (the Kalachuris of Tripuri), the Kosalas (possibly the Somavamshis), the Mithila (possibly a small tributary ruler), Malavas (identified with the Paramaras), the Kurus, the Kashmiris and the Gurjaras.[14] These claims appear to be exaggerated, as similar claims of extensive conquests in northern India are also found in the records of the other contemporary kings such as the Kalachuri king Yuva-Raja and the Rashtrakuta king Krishna III.[15] Yashovarman's reign marked the beginning of the famous Chandela-era art and architecture. He commissioned the Lakshmana Temple at Khajuraho.[13]

Unlike the earlier Chandela inscriptions, the records of Yashovarman's successor Dhanga (r. c. 950-999 CE) do not mention any Pratihara overlord. This indicates that Dhanga formally established the Chandela sovereignty.[16] A Khajuraho inscription claims that the rulers of Kosala, Kratha (part of Vidarbha region), Kuntala, and Simhala listened humbly to the commands of Dhanga's officers. It also claims that the wives of the kings of Andhra, Anga, Kanchi and Raḍha resided in his prisons as a result of his success in wars. These appear to be eulogistic exaggerations by a court poet, but suggest that Dhanga did undertake extensive military campaigns.[17][18] Like his predecessor, Dhanga also commissioned a magnificent temple at Khajuraho, which is identified as the Vishvanatha Temple.[19]

Dhanga's successor Ganda appears to have retained the territory he inherited.[20] His son Vidyadhara killed the Pratihara king of Kannauj (possibly Rajyapala) for fleeing his capital instead of fighting the Ghaznavid invader Mahmud of Ghazni.[21][22] Mahmud later invaded Vidyadhara's kingdom; according to the Muslim invaders, this conflict ended with Vidyadhara paying tribute to Mahmud.[23] Vidyadhara is noted for having commissioned the Kandariya Mahadeva Temple.[24]

The Chandela art and architecture reached its zenith during this period. The Lakshmana Temple (c. 930–950 CE), the Vishvanatha Temple (c. 999-1002 CE) and the Kandariya Mahadeva Temple (c. 1030 CE) were constructed during the reigns of Yashovarman, Dhanga and Vidyadhara respectively. These Nagara-style temples are representative of the most fully developed style at Khajuraho.[25]


A 20th century artist's imagination of Kirtivarman Chandela visiting a Khajuraho temple

By the end of Vidyadhara's reign, the Ghaznavid invasions had weakened the Chandela kingdom. Taking advantage of this, the Kalachuri king Gangeya-deva conquered eastern parts of the kingdom.[26] Chandela inscriptions suggest that Vidyadhara's successor Vijayapala (r. c. 1035-1050 CE) defeated Gangeya in a battle.[27] However, the Chandela power started declining during the Vijayapala's reign.[28] The Kachchhapaghatas of Gwalior probably gave up their allegiance to the Chandelas during this period.[29]

Vijayapala's elder son Devavavarman was subjugated by Gangeya's son Lakshmi-Karna.[30] His younger brother Kirttivarman resurrected the Chandela power by defeating Lakshmi-Karna.[31] Kirtivarman's son Sallakshanavarman achieved military successes against the Paramaras and the Kalachuris, possibly by raiding their territories. A Mau inscription suggests that he also conducted successful campaigns in the Antarvedi region (the Ganga-Yamuna doab).[32] His son Jayavarman was of religious temperament and abdicated the throne after being tired of governance.[33]

Jayavarman appears to have died heirless, as he was succeeded by his uncle Prithvivarman, the younger son of Kirttivarman.[34] The Chandela inscriptions do not ascribe any military achievements to him; it appears that he was focused on maintaining the existing Chandela territories without adopting an aggressive expansionist policy.[35]


By the time Prithvivarman's son Madanavarman (r. c. 1128–1165 CE) ascended the throne, the neighbouring Kalachuri and Paramara kingdoms had been weakened by enemy invasions. Taking advantage of this situation, Madanavarman defeated the Kalachuri king Gaya-Karna, and possibly annexed the northern part of the Baghelkhand region.[36] However, the Chandelas lost this territory to Gaya-Karna's successor Narasimha.[37] Madanavarman also captured the territory on the western periphery of the Paramara kingdom, around Bhilsa (Vidisha). This probably happened during the reign of the Paramara king Yashovarman or his son Jayavarman.[38][39] Once again, the Chandelas could not retain the newly annexed territory for long, and the region was recaptured by Yashovarman's son Lakshmivarman.[37]

Jayasimha Siddharaja, the Chaulukya king of Gujarat, also invaded the Paramara territory, which was located between the Chandela and the Chaulukya kingdoms. This brought him in conflict with Madanavarman. The result of this conflict appears to have been inconclusive, as records of both the kingdoms claim victory.[40] A Kalanjara inscription suggests that Madanavarman defeated Jayasimha. On the other hand, the various chronicles of Gujarat claim that Jayasimha either defeated Madanavarman or extracted a tribute from him.[41] Madanavarman maintained friendly relations with his northern neighbours, the Gahadavalas.[42]

Madanavarman's son Yashovarman II either did not rule, or ruled for a very short time. Madanavarman's grandson Paramardi-deva was the last powerful Chandela king.[43]

Final decline[edit]

Paramardi (reigned c. 1165-1203 CE) ascended the Chandela throne at a young age. While the early years of his reign were peaceful, around 1182-1183 CE, the Chahamana ruler Prithviraj Chauhan invaded the Chandela kingdom. According to the medieval legendary ballads, Prithviraj's army lost its way after a surprise attack by Turkic forces, and unknowingly camped at the Chandela capital Mahoba. This led to a brief conflict between the Chandelas and the Chauhans, before Prithviraj left for Delhi. Sometime later, Prithviraj invaded the Chandela kingdom and sacked Mahoba. Paramardi cowardly took shelter in the Kalanjara fort. The Chandela force, led by Alha, Udal and other generals, was defeated in this battle. According to the various ballads, Paramardi either committed suicide out of shame or retired to Gaya.[44]

Prithviraj Chauhan's raid of Mahoba is corroborated by his Madanpur stone inscriptions. However, there are several instances of historical inaccuracies in the bardic legends. For example, it is known that Paramardi did not retire or die immediately after the Chauhan victory. He restored the Chandela power, and ruled as a sovereign until around 1202-1203 CE, when the Delhi Sultanate invaded the Chandela kingdom.[45] According to Taj-ul-Maasir, a chronicle of the Delhi Sultanate, Paramardi surrendered to the Delhi Sultan. He promised to pay tribute to the Sultan, but died before he could keep this promise. His dewan offered some resistance to the invading forces, but was ultimately subdued. The 16th century historian Firishta states that Paramardi was assassinated by his own minister, who disagreed with the king's decision to surrender to the Delhi forces.[46]

The Chandela power did not fully recover from their defeat against the Delhi Sultanate. Paramardi was succeeded by Trailokyavarman, Viravarman and Bhojavarman. The next ruler Hammiravarman (r. c. 1288-1311 CE) did not use the imperial title Maharajadhiraja, which indicates that the Chandela king had a lower status by his time. The Chandela power continued to decline because of the rising Muslim influence, as well as the rise of other local dynasties, such as the Bundelas, the Baghelas and the Khangars.[47]

Hammiravarman was succeeded by Viravarman II, whose titles do not indicate a high political status.[48][49] One minor branch of the family continued ruling Kalanjara: its ruler was killed by Sher Shah Suri's army in 1545 CE. Another minor branch ruled at Mahoba: one of its princesses married into the Gond royal family of Mandla. Some other ruling families also claimed Chandela descent (see Chandel).[50]

Art and architecture[edit]

The Chandelas are well known for their art and architecture. They commissioned a number of temples, water bodies, palaces and forts at various places. The most famous example of their cultural achievements are the Hindu and Jain temples at Khajuraho. Three other important Chandela strongholds were Jayapura-Durga (modern Ajaigarh), Kalanjara (modern Kalinjar) and Mahotsava-Nagara (modern Mahoba).[51]

Other smaller Chandela sites include Chandpur, Deogarh, Dudahi, Kakadeo and Madanpur.[51]

List of rulers[edit]

Chandela is located in India
Chandela territory, as indicated by the find spots of inscriptions issued during the Chandela reign[52]

Based on epigraphic records, the historians have come up with the following list of Chandela rulers of Jejākabhukti (IAST names in brackets):[53][54]


  1. ^ a b R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 3.
  2. ^ 'Origin of the Chandellas', in J.N. Asopa, Origin of the Rajputs (Delhi- Varanasi-Calcutta, 1976), pp. 208
  3. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 4.
  4. ^ Ali Javid and Tabassum Javeed (2008). World Heritage Monuments and Related Edifices in India. 1. Algora. p. 44. ISBN 9780875864822. 
  5. ^ Radhey Shyam Chaurasia, History of Ancient India: Earliest Times to 1000 A. D.
  6. ^ Sen, S.N., 2013, A Textbook of Medieval Indian History, Delhi: Primus Books, ISBN 9789380607344
  7. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, pp. 27-28.
  8. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, p. 30.
  9. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 28.
  10. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, pp. 30-31.
  11. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, pp. 32-35.
  12. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, pp. 36-37.
  13. ^ a b Sushil Kumar Sullerey 2004, p. 24.
  14. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, p. 42-51.
  15. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 42.
  16. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, p. 57.
  17. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 56.
  18. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, pp. 61-65.
  19. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 69.
  20. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, pp. 72.
  21. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, pp. 72-73.
  22. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 72.
  23. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, pp. 81-82.
  24. ^ Sushil Kumar Sullerey 2004, p. 26.
  25. ^ James C. Harle (1994). The Art and Architecture of the Indian Subcontinent. Yale University Press. p. 234. 
  26. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, pp. 89-90.
  27. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, p. 88.
  28. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 101.
  29. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, p. 90.
  30. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, p. 91.
  31. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, p. 94.
  32. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 120-121.
  33. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 126.
  34. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, pp. 110-111.
  35. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, p. 111.
  36. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 132.
  37. ^ a b R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 135.
  38. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, pp. 130-132.
  39. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, p. 112-113.
  40. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 133.
  41. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, pp. 133-134.
  42. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 132-133.
  43. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 130.
  44. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, pp. 120-123.
  45. ^ Sisirkumar Mitra 1977, pp. 123-126.
  46. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 148.
  47. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 179.
  48. ^ a b Jackson 2003, p. 199.
  49. ^ Misra 2003, p. 11.
  50. ^ Thapar 2013, p. 572.
  51. ^ a b Sushil Kumar Sullerey 2004, p. 17.
  52. ^ Harihar Vitthal Trivedi 1991, pp. 335-552.
  53. ^ R. K. Dikshit 1976, p. 25.
  54. ^ Sushil Kumar Sullerey 2004, p. 25.


External links[edit]