User:Pecopteris/AFD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
User:Pecopteris User_Talk:Pecopteris User:Pecopteris/To_Do User:Pecopteris/Info User:Pecopteris/AFD User:Pecopteris/ControlPanel
User page Talk Page To Do List INFO AFD Control Panel
Checkuser pages
Requests: UnlistedIP checkOn hold
Archives: MainOlderIP checksUnsorted
Clerk pages
Clerk OverviewNoticeboardProcedures
Shortcut
This page can be quickly accessed through:
WP:RFCU/C/P

Google books Wikipedia article traffic statistics Find sources: "AFD" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · Wikipedia library WP:NWP:CLSWP:LISTWP:RS

Guide to deletion
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.

Purge server cache

Rafael Serrano (cyclist)[edit]

Rafael Serrano (cyclist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rafael Serrano (cyclist)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Subject—a cyclist—doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria at WP:NCYCLING. For general notability, the only published sources I can find fall under WP:ROUTINE. —  Rebbing  talk  16:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Kieran Cassidy[edit]

Kieran Cassidy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kieran Cassidy" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Per WP:PERPETRATOR, no indication of notability outside of the crime he committed, for which coverage was not long-lasting. The crime itself is now covered in Vehicle matching scam, created by same WP:SPA. Prod contested by anonymous editor. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 15:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 15:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 15:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

13 (Armstrong novel)[edit]

13 (Armstrong novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "13 (Armstrong novel)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable book. No claim to notability provided in article; no references, either. References to substantiate notability aren't forthcoming, so I don't think this meets WP:NBOOK. Mikeblas (talk) 15:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

University of International Innovations[edit]

University of International Innovations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "University of International Innovations" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Near as I can tell, this is not an accredited learning institution. I declined Speedy A7, as educational institutions do not qualify, I find no reliable sources discussing the topic, much less anything that says it is other than a self-made learning course. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Delete: entirely without notability, indeed only 11 google results (including a Speedy deletion on Wikia), none of them of any substance. And since it's not a real university, can't see why it shouldn't be speedied here too. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

List of international goals scored by Mirko Vučinić[edit]

List of international goals scored by Mirko Vučinić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of international goals scored by Mirko Vučinić" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG. Besides, he has only scored 17 goals. C. Ronaldo Aveiro (talk) 15:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Hira Thind[edit]

Hira Thind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Hira Thind" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Contested prod. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. None of the sources provided in the article are reliable sources that are independent of the subject. My search for additional sources came up empty. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 15:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete I also looked around and couldn't find anything on this actor. Not-notable enough even to list what they were in in the article it appears as well. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:12, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Roger Joseph Manning, Jr.[edit]

Roger Joseph Manning, Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Roger Joseph Manning, Jr." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Ten-year-old BLP without reliable sources. An AllMusic biography exists, but beyond that I have been unable to find more than passing mentions. The content is promotional. I had turned the page into a redirect to Jellyfish (band), which already provides ample information on Manning and apparently is the project he is best known for, but that was reverted without improvement. Bringing it here for a discussion per WP:BLAR. Huon (talk) 14:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  14:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Musicians-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  14:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  14:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Jennifer Grossman[edit]

Jennifer Grossman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jennifer Grossman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No indication of notability. Of the given references, one is by Grossman herself, two are speaker respectively author bios, one talks about fitness workout in the workplace and uses Grossman as a rather random example, and the last is a local newspaper. The tone is unduly promotional, borderline G11, and would need a complete rewrite even if Grossman were notable in the first place. Huon (talk) 13:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  14:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Agree: The history of content additions reveals probable edits by the subject herself whose career is neither notable nor currently developing, as she appears from a web search to be unemployed and inactive since 2013. Recent edits by different floating IPv6 addresses and the new user, Usuariodesconocidodiverso, all exclusively on the subject herself, are self-aggrandizing, WP:PEA, WP:PLUG and WP:COISELF. Recommend for speedy deletion. --Zefr (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  14:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Linux Lite[edit]

Linux Lite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Linux Lite" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The topic of this article lacks notability as it fails WP:PRODUCT. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:34, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 13:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Anthony Appleyard, CSD G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

PP MUKUNDAN[edit]

PP MUKUNDAN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "PP MUKUNDAN" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Unsourced BLP Zamaster4536 (talk) 08:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 13:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Moynahan syndrome[edit]

Moynahan syndrome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Moynahan syndrome" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Completing nomination on behalf of an IP editor, whose rationale (below) is copied from the article talk page. I make no recommendation - but if the subject doesn't actually exist, then deletion may be warranted. Of course, if it does exist but is a different thing, then that's where we need to reference and copy edit and make the article accurate. A redirect may also be appropriate, if there is an article for whatever disease that is sometimes referred to by this title. So, now that I've muddied the waters enough - have at. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 13:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

"Moynahan Syndrome" is a misnomer. The "New Syndrome" as identified by the symptoms of patient "LW" described by Dr. EJ Moynahan FRCP (Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians) in Proc R Soc Med. 1962 November; 55(11): 959–960: Multiple Symmetrical Moles, with Psychic and Somatic Infantilism and Genital Hypoplasia: First Male Case of a New Syndrome, was never defined as "Moynahan Syndrome" nor was it ever referenced as such. Ref here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1896920/. References from whonamedit.com and Andrews' Diseases of the Skin: clinical Dermatology to this article, mimic the same symptoms identified by the Proc R Soc Med. 1962 November; 55(11): 959–960 journal publication but also inaccurately reflect this as "Moynahan Syndrome". 70.196.193.31 (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Technopark, Kollam[edit]

Technopark, Kollam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Technopark, Kollam" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Completely lacking independent sources - fails GNG.  Philg88 talk 13:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 talk 13:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  14:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk  14:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Maša Vujadinović[edit]

Maša Vujadinović (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Maša Vujadinović" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Suspected self-promotion, non-notable child singer Sideshow Bob 10:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Comment Suspected self-promotion, @Sideshow Bob:? Both Maša Vujadinović and Lejla Vulić were created by the same user Jjj1238. I pretty much doubt self-promotion falls into it here. Not unless Maša, Lejla, and the Wikipedian Jjj1238 are all the same person. And with a 2-year age gap between the two child singers, then I think it is highly unlikely they are all the same person. Wes Mouse  13:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Lejla Vulić[edit]

Lejla Vulić (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lejla Vulić" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Suspected self-promotion, absolutely non-notable child singer Sideshow Bob 10:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Comment Suspected self-promotion, @Sideshow Bob:? Both Maša Vujadinović and Lejla Vulić were created by the same user Jjj1238. I pretty much doubt self-promotion falls into it here. Not unless Maša, Lejla, and the Wikipedian Jjj1238 are all the same person. And with a 2-year age gap between the two child singers, then I think it is highly unlikely they are all the same person. Wes Mouse  13:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Well someone ought go on and merge them already, since the existence of separate articles is utterly unnecessary and the tag has been there for almost a year. I couldn't care less about the subject, but I'm sure that the articles do not meet notability guidelines. Sideshow Bob 13:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Well where does the burden lie? If you had noticed the merge proposal, then you could have easily carried out that merge, rather than submit a wasted AfD. And haven't we forgotten that there is a real world beyond Wikipedia, and that there is no deadline. It was already discussed in August 2015 following a debate with another Junior Eurovision (JESC) singer, and the outcome was that any JESC artist that did not place in the top 3 of the final should be should have its brief bio information written in the respect country in Junior Eurovision article, per point 9 of WP:MUSICBIO. This would also prevent the wasting of time sumbiting WP:AfDs, WP:SPEEDY, and WP:NOTREPOSITORY. Which is clearly noted at Talk:Montenegro in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2014#Merger proposal. Wes Mouse  14:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Victorian Polo Club[edit]

Victorian Polo Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Victorian Polo Club" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

"One of the oldest polo clubs in Australia" is not sufficient claim to notability, and none of the sources cited are reliable and independent of the source. The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Rurika Kasuga[edit]

Rurika Kasuga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rurika Kasuga" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Manga artist only notable work for English Wikipedia is Fancy Lala, of which she only did a manga adaptation (not the original work), so recommend redirect to that. ANN only shows one role. [1] MADB only shows a bunch of one volume manga none of which are that notable. [2] AngusWOOF (barksniff) 08:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 08:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 08:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 08:31, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Ariane Bellamar[edit]

Ariane Bellamar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ariane Bellamar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Article created by COI editor. DePRODded by another possible COI editor. PROD reason still stands: " No evidence of any notability. Scant coverage and what there is comes from tabloids (see WP:BLPSOURCES). Does not meet WP:BIO." Hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 07:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

I recently added articles published by the LA Times, Forbes, NY Post, IMDB, USA Today, Daily Mail, Variety, Salt Lake Tribune, San Diego Tribune, Fox 5 News, and I have even more if necessary. Could you please let me know why this article is being reviewed for deletion due to a 'lack of credible sources'? Thank you. Tan (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep - I think the references meet the WP:RS threshold and WP:GNG. KagunduWanna Chat? 12:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment – I have removed all of the IMDb refs. What's left are a slew of references to a single domestic battery circumstance, and little else. This is looking like it might be a WP:BIO1E situation. In terms of a "body" of work, I don't think she passes WP:NACTOR, as her roles all seem to be "bit parts". --IJBall (contribstalk) 14:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Shrek is love Shrek is life[edit]

Shrek is love Shrek is life (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Shrek is love Shrek is life" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable meme. I can't find reliable sources. —teb728 t c 07:16, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Tokyogirl79 - I declined the speedy deletion since it was at least significant enough to have some content written somewhere, but it doesn't demonstrate notability and more fits into an overall internet portrayal of Shrek. (Why am I spending my time on Wikipedia writing about Shrek?) Appable (talk) 14:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

The Book of Maggie[edit]

The Book of Maggie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The Book of Maggie" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Unnotable play. No indication of notability via the references provided. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment: I don't really consider Broadway World to be a RS myself, but I know that it is used on Wikipedia. (My hesitation comes from the fact that they sell tickets and have job postings.) Assuming that BW is a reliable source, there would be a review and an interview, which would be helpful. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Clay Garner[edit]

Clay Garner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Clay Garner" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:MUSIC. -download 05:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:25, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete at best, questionably enough for the applicable notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Rollercoaster World[edit]

Rollercoaster World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Rollercoaster World" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This is a completely non-notable RollerCoaster Tycoon copycat. Gamerankings and MobyGames found no reliable reviews and/or articles talking about this game, and Google searches proved likewise. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 01:26, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm indifferent to Delete or Keep but there are articles on the game and also not a "copycat" of RollerCoaster Tycoon... it's is part of the Tycoon franchise. Mobygames Link IGN link and there are more... Pmedema (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • I think you've might've been misled here. The MobyGames link is a self-released user review and the IGN link reviews a different game that could be also considered similar to Rollercoaster Tycoon, Theme Park Roller Coaster. Also, where is the evidence that saids Rollercoaster World is officially a part of the Rollercoaster Tycoon series and not a rip-off of it? edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī😎 23:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

PSHDL[edit]

PSHDL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "PSHDL" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The topic of this article, a hardware description language (HDL) called Plain & Simple Hardware Description Language (PSHDL), fails WP:GNG. It is an educational/hobbyist HDL with no meaningful acceptance. As far as I am able to determine, it is not supported by common, real-world, third-party electronic design automation (EDA) software; and there is no evidence that it has much use in tertiary-level education, academic and industrial research, or industry.

A search for this HDL at the IEEE Xplore Digital Library returns one paper ("A web based tool for teaching hardware design based on the plain simple hardware description language"), which appears to be written by the creator of this HDL, or by a person closely associated with the effort behind this HDL. It was presented at the Global Engineering Education Conference, which suggests the impact of this HDL is negligible since the premier conference for HDLs is the Design Automation Conference. The paper itself has not been cited by any other works.

A Google Scholar search returned no results for the full-name and 14 results for "PSHDL", all of which were false-positives. A Google Books and News search returned no results for either name. A Google Web search returned no results in the first 100 results that could be deemed to be independent and reliable secondary or tertiary sources (which are required to establish notability per WP:GNG). AZ1199 (talk) 04:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete I could find no evidence of notability through independent reliable sources, just the single primary source. Kudos go to the nom for a careful description of their investigation into the topic and its notability. --Mark viking (talk) 06:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Enders Analysis[edit]

Enders Analysis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Enders Analysis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This article seems to be purely promotional, probably written by a non-neutral party. The first three sources are primary sources (the company's own website). Many of the other sources are not coverage OF the company, but just trivial mentions. No independent sources are listed, nor could I find any. Fails Wikipedia:Notability Mb66w (talk) 04:43, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 13:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete as none of this suggests better applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Saravah Soul[edit]

Saravah Soul (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Saravah Soul" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I can find no evidence of notability using Wikipedia:Notability (music). I've looked and can't see any detail suggesting this is a notable group. 🍺 Antiqueight chat 04:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spirit Ethanol (talk) 12:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spirit Ethanol (talk) 12:48, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete as not enough solidly convincing signs of the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 21:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Louis Leeman[edit]

Louis Leeman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Louis Leeman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Doesn't appear to be notable. Slightly promotional language. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • delete blatant advert. Created by a single purpose editor of the same name. LibStar (talk) 13:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - this is speedy delete material. KagunduWanna Chat? 12:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Agricultural theme park[edit]

Agricultural theme park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Agricultural theme park" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

There is not enough reliable sources directly covering the article. FiendYT 02:59, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. utcursch | talk 03:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment Afd should be listed in the Agriculture deletion discussions.--DThomsen8 (talk) 12:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete as pure self promotion by use of a term that has not gained currency, acquired meaning, or spurred emulation. Note, however, that a handful of promoters have called their projects "agricultural theme parks" one in California [3] in 1998; another in Costa Rica [4], one being promoted in Korea now [5]. Note also that Farm museums exist, as do U-Pick and Pick-Your-Own (PYO) Farms, many with playgrounds and picnic tables, but they are not this (nor is Knott's Berry Farm.) In sum, Agricultural theme parks may catch on, just, it hasn't yet.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Eesti tippmodell (cycle 4)[edit]

Eesti tippmodell (cycle 4) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Eesti tippmodell (cycle 4)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This individual season of a country specific version of this television show fails notability guidelines. Safiel (talk) 02:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep. The season is just as important as other seasons from NTM series. It also features more references than most of modelling reality-based TV shows. --SkySmileLo (talk) 16:02, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep. This discussion shouldn't be held and the activities of the user who started it really needs to stop his habbit of deleting articles for certain TV shows. Shameless (talk) 21:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment Keep your comments focused on the merits of the article. I suggest you give a valid reason for keeping the article and refrain from criticizing other editors or commenting on their motives. Comment on the encyclopedia, NOT the editors. Safiel (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

William Edward Fraser[edit]

William Edward Fraser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "William Edward Fraser" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Not yet notable per WP:Politician or WP:BIO. Independent candidate, not yet elected to any office, with no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources, just the small amount of local coverage that any candidate for national office would receive. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 06:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 06:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 06:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - these are admirable goals, but he's not even certain to be on the ballot. Blythwood (talk) 06:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • In regards to sources being local, one of the articles is by a national source (Independent Voter Network). In terms of him being a "fringe candidate," an attempt at changing the status quo in a race that is very closely watched by the media should be notable due to the very unique and non-traditional jab at the two-party system. Vote4fraser (talk) 06:32, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
"A politician who has received 'significant press coverage' has been written about, in depth, independently in multiple news feature articles, by journalists." ... Two articles featuring him were cited. Vote4fraser (talk) 06:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Anil Pratap Singh[edit]

Anil Pratap Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Anil Pratap Singh" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The individual doesn't appear to have been elected to, or held, any political office Uhooep (talk) 06:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Chittoor Road[edit]

Chittoor Road (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chittoor Road" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

WP:Unreferenced, WP:OR Vin09(talk) 06:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Keep. Tag it for unreferenced. It seems to be a major and historical road, and is in India. There are lots of articles covering much less significant roads in the U.S. There's no dispute suggested by nom about whether the road exists and is historic and major. It is notable. --doncram 08:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 12:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Kadaltheerathu[edit]

Kadaltheerathu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kadaltheerathu" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This article makes no claim to notability, and a web search turns up nothing that would suggest this film is notable. Therefore, I propose its deletion. —♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 01:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
alts:
year:(Find sources: "Kadal Theerathu (1988)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
type:(Find sources: "KadalTheerathu Movie" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
English title:(Find sources: "On the Seashore (1988 film)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
director:(Find sources: "T. Rajeevnath, KadalTheerathu" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
star:(Find sources: "Gopalakrishnan, KadalTheerathu" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
star:(Find sources: "Amir Abbas, KadalTheerathu" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
WP:INDAFD: "Kadal Theerathu" "T. Rajeevnath" "Gopalakrishnan" "Amir Abbas"
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

ActivePython[edit]

ActivePython (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "ActivePython" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I found no significant coverage for this software per WP:N. SL93 (talk) 01:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. FallingGravity (talk) 02:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep The term "ActivePython" (in quotes) gets 194 hits on books.google.com. I haven't checked every single hit, but it appears most or all of them are genuinely about this software package. scholar.google.com gives 113 hits. Looks to me like WP:RS covering this topic exists. SJK (talk) 07:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Draft and userfy at best for now unless it can be better improved before this AfD closes as the current article is still questionable. SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep. Clearly notable per the Google Books and Scholar searches spoon-fed by the nomination process. The whole point of Wikipedia is that articles get improved when they are visible to the general public rather than hidden in draft or user space. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 22:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep - I can find some reliable trade references to this, although it isn't a a major development tool. It does seem about consistent with entries for other similar products. Shritwod (talk) 09:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Merge to either CPython or ActiveState. I checked the GBooks mentions and most are in passing; some of them are just the main program's startup banner, printed. At some point down the list, GBooks just produces Python books, even with the search string in quotes, that don't seem to even mention ActivePython. The GScholar results aren't much better, and largely overlap with the GBooks ones. This product has good rep, but little in-depth coverage, so it would deserve mention in a list of prepackaged CPythons, but not a separate article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Mobile leisure[edit]

Mobile leisure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mobile leisure" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This topic is already covered in multiple articles, including:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Mike Vaughn[edit]

Mike Vaughn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mike Vaughn" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) As far as his voice acting roles, he had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Doesn't pass actor notability guidelines. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 02:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. czar 02:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete as certainly questionable for WP:CREATIVE, unlikely any solid better coverage. SwisterTwister talk 05:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment – I'm surprised. I would have thought the voice of the killer in Scream (TV series) would have gotten some coverage, but I'm not finding anything. I'm not quite ready to vote "delete", but I can't find anything that would lead me away from this being a proper candidate for deletion. --IJBall (contribstalk) 04:06, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spirit Ethanol (talk) 12:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment His numerous Mario voicings seem to be reuse of the same audio recorded in October 2009: http://www.mariowiki.com/Mike_Vaughn. There is a source here, however Cloverleaf Radio isn't very notable in itself. I had a hard time finding any news or articles either. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 12:39, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

F. R. Carrick Institute[edit]

F. R. Carrick Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "F. R. Carrick Institute" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Subject lacks notability, and the page is currently just an ad for the institute. Search for secondary sources resulted in only fluff pieces or blogs criticizing individual researchers. Page could be merged with Frederick Carrick, but it suffers from the same problems. The Institute is listed on the Clinical neuropsychology page as a "US university" which it isn't, as far as I can tell. Of two references, one is a broken link, and it led to the Institute's own page. - Tim D. Williamson yak-yak 03:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. - Tim D. Williamson yak-yak 03:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Ori Calif[edit]

Ori Calif (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ori Calif" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This lawyer made the news for demolishing a historic pub, but that's not enough to satisfy WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete - The subject is covered in reliable sources but mainly for his involvement in "demolishing a pub", which falls under WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP1E. Meatsgains (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 03:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Category 4[edit]

Category 4 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Category 4" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

We are told specifically not to build dabs from partial title matches because the reader is better served by search results. Nothing is known as only 'Category 4' so there is nothing to disambiguate Legacypac (talk) 14:40, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

See policy WP:NAMELIST where I'm referring to "Do not add a link that merely contains part of the page title, or a link that includes the page title in a longer proper name, where there is no significant risk of confusion or reference."' If you follow that policy we have empty dabs here. Legacypac (talk) 18:23, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
It can be used as a reference, as explained by Elf, below. Category 4 is a classification, a valid way of naming articles - for example Category:Disability sport classifications where many of the article titles are just the classifications - it's just that the longer titles used in the disambiguation page are more precise. Peter James (talk) 21:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Delete - hard to imagine anyone is going to be looking for information on this basis, and there must be an enormous number of topics it could apply to. JMWt (talk) 16:52, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
I've fixed the Cat 4 cable article to say "Catrgory 4 cable..." To match how the other Cat X cable articles start out. Not understanding what you mean about links for hurricanes. Legacypac (talk) 17:17, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep If I go to the search page and search for "category 4", all I get are links to templates and to lists of hurricanes or to specific hurricanes (not to the article that describes category 4 hurricanes, even) and finally to track gauges. Doesn't mention cables at all. I've been in the computer world for a long time, and the number of times that someone has said, "you need category 4" (or sometimes category 4 connector or category 4 ethernet or category 4 wire or various others) makes me certain that others will want to search on that. That's *my* first thought when I hear "category 4". Currently, "category 4 connector" gives me nothing useful, "category 4 ethernet" brings up the Ethernet page at the top of the list, which doesn't discuss categories. "category 4 hurricane" does take me to the correct spot, but "category 4 storm" is not helpful at all, asks whether i really mean "category 4 story". So, if we get rid of this, it makes searches less helpful, not better serving users, and there's no one "category 4 xxx" to which we could redirect and then have a DAB statement at the top that lists all other possible cat 4s. I think that these DABs make Wikipedia better. And I'd guess that people are likely to put in just "category 4", not the whole phrase. I'd vote for adding things to all these Category x dab pages to make them even longer lists, not for getting rid of this. Elf | Talk 17:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:54, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:36, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep – these are not "partial title matches". When referring to different contexts, "Category #" is often used standalone. sst(conjugate) 08:57, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Keep. As LegacyPac notes, the Category 5 dab page includes two items specifically named "Category 5", one being an album i think, and is fully "proper" as a dab page. There probably do exist things named exactly "Category 1" or "Category One", and 2 and 3 and 4, which haven't yet been found. These all are useful, good. And handling alternate spellings and very common usages of the imperfect match type is a service. --doncram 09:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

San Bernardino mayoral election, 2017[edit]

San Bernardino mayoral election, 2017 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "San Bernardino mayoral election, 2017" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Unsourced and non-notable as of yet, if ever. Regards, James(talk/contribs) 00:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 00:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 00:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • KEEP San Bernardino is actually well known, it is the anchor of the 13th largest metropolitan area in the United States, larger than San Diego Melanie. Can the article be expanded upon? Yes. If SB is deleted so should the Atlanta one. James is always looking to delete SB articles instead of helping to expand them. House1090 (talk) 07:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete. Note the Atlanta one includes references and has multiple declared candidates. --doncram 09:05, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Redirect to List of mayors of San Bernardino, California. Per WP:CRYSTAL. This article was created with a seeming promotional tone for the incumbent's re-election more than a year and a half in the future. As to the above comment about the 2015 attacks in San Bernardino, that is a different issue not relevant to this. — Maile (talk) 14:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

YTView[edit]

YTView (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "YTView" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This article does cite a number of reliable sources that devote space to this website, but they were most likely written on behalf of the PR person for this website who also is probably responsible for this article. Antrocent (♫♬) 00:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 00:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Comment: Sorry but I do not have any link with the subject, I have been getting information for weeks now, though about doing a WP:DRAFT but decided to post as an article directly since it has reliable sources. Accusing of WP:COI I find it very insulting. OGfromtheGut (talk) 01:22, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete for now at best as this is still questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - Wikipedia is not a company directory. Merely being (allegedly) connected with something notable does not infer notability. Shritwod (talk) 09:54, 12 February 2016 (UTC)