User:Pecopteris/AFD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
User:Pecopteris User_Talk:Pecopteris User:Pecopteris/To_Do User:Pecopteris/Info User:Pecopteris/AFD User:Pecopteris/ControlPanel
User page Talk Page To Do List INFO AFD Control Panel
Checkuser pages
Requests: UnlistedIP checkOn hold
Archives: MainOlderIP checksUnsorted
Clerk pages
Clerk OverviewNoticeboardProcedures
Shortcut
This page can be quickly accessed through:
WP:RFCU/C/P

Google books Wikipedia article traffic statistics ‹See Tfm› Find sources: "AFD" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR · free images · wikipedia library WP:NWP:CLSWP:LISTWP:RS

Guide to deletion
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.

Purge server cache

Contents

KalyeSerye[edit]

KalyeSerye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "KalyeSerye" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No references, no indication of significance. There is already a well-written description of this show at Eat Bulaga!#Juan for All, All for Juan: Bayanihan of d' Pipol, but the creator of this article has rejected the redirect. ubiquity (talk) 17:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Ben Fankhauser[edit]

Ben Fankhauser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Ben Fankhauser" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No evidence of any notability here. Playbills, college reports and supporting cast. Nothing substantial and no substantial refs despite the long list. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk   17:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

De Haan's Bus & Coach[edit]

De Haan's Bus & Coach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "De Haan's Bus & Coach" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Notability? Robvanvee 17:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

NAASCU Season 15[edit]

NAASCU Season 15 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "NAASCU Season 15" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Does not appear that individual seasons of this athletic association are notable. Safiel (talk) 17:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Peter J Park[edit]

Peter J Park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Peter J Park" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Claim to fame is being a city planning director. No third-party reliable source coverage to indicate how individual meets WP:BIO notability guidelines. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

KENSRI School[edit]

KENSRI School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "KENSRI School" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No indicator of significance of the school, no real information about the school except for its being in India. The rest of the article is all promotional and has no real information content - it just consists of what the school allegedly believes and is unsourced. Upjav (talk) 16:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Comment - the page's creator also created an article for Kensri School in 2008 that was speedily deleted. Upjav (talk) 16:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Lady Amelia Windsor[edit]

Lady Amelia Windsor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Lady Amelia Windsor" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable person in the line of succession to the British throne. She is so far in the line of succession that it is highly unlikely she will ever get the throne. On her own, the person in question has failed to garner any notability in her own right. Re5x (talk) 16:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Steven Aguzzi[edit]

Steven Aguzzi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Steven Aguzzi" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No non-trivial coverage in third-party reliable sources to support WP:GNG, nor is there any evidence of WP:PROF notability. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

World Junior Wrestling Championships[edit]

World Junior Wrestling Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "World Junior Wrestling Championships" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Poorly-sourced article about an amateur sporting event. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NOTSTATS. - MrX 16:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because if the main article is deleted than the individual year pages would also need to go.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

2008 World Junior Wrestling Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2009 World Junior Wrestling Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
2015 World Junior Wrestling Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Comment Although the nomination may be correct it is a little fast - the main article and 2015 are clearly a work in progress and they may yet have better sources added and some prose that will take it beyond a collection of stats.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

2015 World Cadet Wrestling Championships[edit]

2015 World Cadet Wrestling Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "2015 World Cadet Wrestling Championships" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Poorly-sourced article about an amateur sporting event. Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:NOTSTATS. - MrX 15:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I'll add the World Cadet Wrestling Championships without endorsing the deletion (or keeping) since there is an obvious relation between them. The Junior has its own deletion discussion where I will add the related ones.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

World Cadet Wrestling Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Comment: These articles look suspiciously like the work of Mauricio80.- MrX 16:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment Although the nomination may be correct it is a little fast - the articles are clearly a work in progress and they may yet have better sources added and some prose that will take it beyond a collection of stats.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Fortunately, the article creator has seven days to add sources before the articles will be deleted. - MrX 16:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Exactly - not all is lost by the early nomination - just that I would have thought a little time would have been better. My own vote will wait a few days.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

hello every body , help to expand and not delet , thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarayuna (talkcontribs) 17:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Jan Terri[edit]

Jan Terri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Jan Terri" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No evidence of notability. Article is entirely self-sourced. Jacona (talk) 14:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Richard Goodall Gallery[edit]

Richard Goodall Gallery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Richard Goodall Gallery" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This seems to me to be an essentially promotional article about a non-notable commercial gallery. It's covered with "citation needed" and "unrefereneced" tags, most of the existing references are about the people exhibited rather than the place, so I believe WP:NOTINHERITED applies, many of the listed people shown are redlinked, and most importantly my search threw up little other than the gallery's own site or blogs. TheLongTone (talk) 14:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Anapsytics[edit]

Anapsytics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Anapsytics" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable neologism. Fails WP:GNG. - MrX 14:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete A Google search for this term on the web shows only this Wikipedia article as a result. A search in Google books and Google Scholar shows no hits. The entire article reads like an ad for some HR company's new improved screening process. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Mimi Craven[edit]

Mimi Craven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Craven Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Mimi Craven" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable actress. Mimi Craven had small roles in just three movies — the most recent of which was 23 years ago. She was only married to director Wes Craven for three years, and in any event, notability is not inherited. Why someone with just three minor-role credits in 1982, 1984 and 1992 has a Wikipedia page is beyond me. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR. - MrX 16:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Chetti Thanabalasingam[edit]

Chetti Thanabalasingam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Chetti Thanabalasingam" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non notable person fails WP:Biography ,General notability guideline and is not inherited by his association to ), Velupillai Prabhakaran . Mylai roja (talk) 13:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Ausindex[edit]

Ausindex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Ausindex" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No reference Aero Slicer 13:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

More significantly, it is a WP:copyright violation from http://www.ssbcrack.com/2015/08/all-you-need-to-know-about-ausindex.html so I have tagged it for speedy deletion on those grounds. - David Biddulph (talk) 14:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Fingerling (finger accessory)[edit]

Fingerling (finger accessory) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Fingerling (finger accessory)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Hardly seems notable. This has gone from one reference to zero references, as the one source that apparently made a mention is now a dead link. Even with that, it is unclear whether this is a product or merely a brand for a product. bd2412 T 13:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Marziah Karch[edit]

Marziah Karch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Marziah Karch" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Article lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. There has been no significant improvement in the sourcing since the previous AFD. Whpq (talk) 13:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Ramón H. Dovalina[edit]

Ramón H. Dovalina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Ramón H. Dovalina" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Former president of a local community college. Notability is not encyclopedic, although locally notable. While this article has many references, the ones that pass WP:RS are local papers. The balance are passing mentions or should not be used at all (intelius, findagrave, classmates.com) ScrpIronIV 13:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Bhinder[edit]

Bhinder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Bhinder" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:GNG. Has been prodded twice. No point in redirecting to Jat people, as an anon did recently. Sitush (talk) 12:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Radio Entreolas[edit]

Radio Entreolas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Radio Entreolas" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

It is not possible to independently establish the notability of the radio station serving a small-town (pop.13000). Sources used are a mention in a local newspaper from the same town and a link to a pdf listing the the radio as "admissible" to state subsidies. The local newspaper, El Marino (not to confuse with the defunct newspaper of the same name), mentions the radio station frequently but is it enough? In small community of 13000 poeple (Pichilemu) there can be plenty of cross-references, but zooming out to a regional or national level references are practically non-existent. Sietecolores (talk) 11:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC) Sietecolores (talk) 11:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 12:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep The radio passes notability guidelines. I suggest you withdraw this biased nomination, and stop this behavior. If you nominate just one more Pichilemu-related article, I will report you to the administrators' noticeboard for disrupting the project Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 13:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Dhoka The mystery[edit]

Dhoka The mystery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Dhoka The mystery" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Wikipedia is not a directory of student projects. I dream of horses (T) @ 11:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 11:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 11:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - I was about to nominate this for deletion myself. Either way, despite its claim to notability as the first animated student film produced in the Maldives, I couldn't actually find reliable coverage that confirmed this. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - lack of WP:RS. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 14:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Launch pad = SHAR (Sriharikota high altitude range)[edit]

Article ([{{fullurl:{{{1}}}|action=edit}} edit] | [[Talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] | [{{fullurl:{{{1}}}|action=history}} history] | [{{fullurl:{{{1}}}|action=protect}} protect] | [{{fullurl:{{{1}}}|action=delete}} delete] | [{{fullurl:Special:Whatlinkshere/{{{1}}}|limit=999}} links] | [{{fullurl:{{{1}}}|action=watch}} watch] | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "AFD" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Launch pads are not necessarily notable. Eat me, I'm a red bean (discusscontribs) 11:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

William Albert Clark[edit]

William Albert Clark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "William Albert Clark" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I am not sure if this article meets GNG. A Google search found a few mentions, but they may not be sufficient to establish notability. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 11:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Lady Madcap[edit]

Lady Madcap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Lady Madcap" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I'm not entirely sure if this play is notable. I dream of horses (T) @ 10:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @ 10:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Maybe this musical is not super important, but it originates the text used by Malcolm McLaren on his album Waltz Darling. I've not found anywhere that information, and it seems interesting. Ingene (talk) 11:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
I think we should keep the article. This work was not in the Florodora league (another Rubens show) but collectively our series on Edwardian musical comedies, both major and minor, constitutes an important body of encyclopaedic knowledge. The creators of this piece are all highly notable in their fields, and in my view any work by them is ipso facto notable. Tim riley talk 12:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Danang Pradana Dieva[edit]

Danang Pradana Dieva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Danang Pradana Dieva" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No real sources about them found, fails WP:NMUSIC. PROD removed from an IP with no explanation. Mdann52 (talk) 10:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Coach (2016 TV series)[edit]

Coach (2016 TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Coach (2016 TV series)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Television project in development that is uncertain to ever enter production; standalone article fails WP:CRYSTAL, and this show's development process is not notable. Section at Coach (TV series) discussing proposed continuation is suitable. -- Wikipedical (talk) 09:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Devyal caste[edit]

Devyal caste (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Devyal caste" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I simply could not find any mentions of this caste anywhere online. I even suspect that it's a hoax. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Marilyn R. (Lynn) McDonald[edit]

Marilyn R. (Lynn) McDonald (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Marilyn R. (Lynn) McDonald" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I'm not sure if this can be improved as my searches found no good results with this and this being the best results. It also seems there's no good move target aside from her son's article Ben Wikler. It seems several of the editors aren't very active aside from DGG (which removed the speedy and I know this subject interests him) and also notifying author Paulbaker55. Summarily, there's simply nothing to suggest improvement and nothing to suggest FAST is notable enough for its own article. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

DJ Mog[edit]

DJ Mog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "DJ Mog" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The one song with Sarah Lynn was probably the most notable and at least most noticeable but I'm not sure if there's much for better notability; my searches here, here, here, here (this is also found in browser) and some searches at a few other Irish news sources found nothing particularly good. There's also not a good move target, it was started by the record label and edits have not been significantly good so I hope this AfD can get some attention. Pinging past editors Beetstra and Joe Decker. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment - If it seems like the only notable thing that he can be connected to is the "Somewhere" song, then I suppose the information about him that's actually cited (not much given the state of the 'DJ Mog' article right now) can be merged onto the song's page and a redirect could be set up. I'm not sure, though. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 12:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children[edit]

American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This may be notable but I'm not entirely sure as my searches found nothing outstandingly good here, here, here, here and here. Pinging the only still active user and probably interested editor Comatmebro. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was

Purohit-Blaivas Staging System[edit]

Speedy deleted without prejudice per - Orangemoody long term abuse PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Purohit-Blaivas Staging System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Purohit-Blaivas Staging System" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No sources for it on pubmed. Also written by a sock. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Jaquel Pitts[edit]

Jaquel Pitts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Jaquel Pitts" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

WP:GNG. Looks more like an advert than an article about an encyclopedic subject. Googling shows references on Twitter, Youtube etc, but not much else. DexDor (talk) 05:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

The British Irish Ulster Forum[edit]

The British Irish Ulster Forum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "The British Irish Ulster Forum" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No evidence that this is a notable forum. Website is currently dead. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Marie Odee Johnson[edit]

Marie Odee Johnson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Marie Odee Johnson" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I'm not sure being one of the last surviving female veterans from WWI and being among one of the first as a Yeoman (F) is a sufficient combination for notability. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Konrad Fuchs[edit]

Konrad Fuchs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Konrad Fuchs" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I'm not sure the combination of oldest living Catholic priest in Europe, second oldest German man and one of the last WWI veterans is a combination that makes someone notable. There is a VIAF identifier which I don't think changes things and it seems like the German version refers to other people. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete Need more info "Oldest living priest in Europe ... Germany's second-oldest man ... one of the last German First World War veterans." None of this equals notability. However, in general anyone with a full obit in the NYT is presumed notable -- is there any similar presumption for a Telegraph obit (which has just been added)? Apologies for my ignorance of British newspapers, pinging Martinevans123 for advice. EEng (talk) 04:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 15:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 15:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 15:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

The One Tax Plan[edit]

The One Tax Plan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "The One Tax Plan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No external references to plan spearheaded by organization also with no external references. Westroopnerd (talk) 03:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

  • More detail and external references added. I will have to scan the original article and add it as a PDF. Can't find electronic version of the Paper from Oct 2008 but have the hard copy. I appreciate the feedback and can add more detail and references if needed. I believe that this should be a Tax-stub so that was added as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnJLund (talkcontribs) 03:40, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Thinks, I appreciate the information...makes sense. Lynn B. Moore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.169.168.139 (talk) 15:58, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete (draft & userfy if needed) as unless it can be improved, there's nothing to improve this interesting yet insufficiently sourced article and my searches found nothing good. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Santiago rugby club[edit]

Santiago rugby club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Santiago rugby club" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This team is not important, no sources are provided, and the article is one sentence long. Charlie the Pig (talk) 05:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete Speedy delete even. No claim of notability.--Savonneux (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:02, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Bribie Island Warrigals[edit]

Bribie Island Warrigals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Bribie Island Warrigals" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable rugby league team. Charlie the Pig (talk) 03:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Kasun Hewage[edit]

Kasun Hewage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Kasun Hewage" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The subject is an Associate Professor. Not notable under WP:PROF or WP:GNG. A series of general references provided which mention the subject in passing but do not establish notability.Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Association for Scottish Public Affairs[edit]

Association for Scottish Public Affairs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Association for Scottish Public Affairs" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable group with zero evidence of good coverage with the best results from my searches here and here. SwisterTwister talk 02:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Lakshman Galagedara[edit]

Lakshman Galagedara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Lakshman Galagedara" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The subject is an Associate Professor. Not notable under WP:PROF or WP:GNG. A series of general references provided which mention the subject in passing but do not establish notability.Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Found no reliable secondary sources to indicate notability. ABF99 (talk) 04:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Kanishka Marasinghe[edit]

Kanishka Marasinghe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Kanishka Marasinghe" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The subject is an Associate Professor. Not notable under WP:PROF or WP:GNG. A series of general references provided which mention the subject in passing but do not establish notability.Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete -Found no independent sources that could establish notability. ABF99 (talk) 04:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:35, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Satoko Kiyuduki[edit]

Satoko Kiyuduki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Satoko Kiyuduki" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Internet searches yield nothing in the way of notability for this person. They have an ANN page with three listed works and some mentions. One of their manga obtained an Oricon ranking, but if anything, it is the manga which may be notable and not the author via WP:ITSA. KirtZJ (talk) 02:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your research and your request for deletion, which has given me the opportunity to find more sources. First I'd like to note that both of her manga that have been translated into English, as well as the anime adaptation of one of them have all independently ranked on Oricon:
She also had an exhibit in Yokohama of original drawings for her GA manga that received some coverage in Japanese [1][2]. Kuro won a "Great Graphic Novels for Teens" award in English. [3]
Oricon does not cover console games (that I'm aware of), where she's also done notable work. In English, Siliconera and IGN have mentioned her work as a major component of Dept. Heaven titles[4][5][6][7], and Famitsu has done the same in Japanese[8][9] as well as covering the game adaptation of her GA manga.[10] Also, while it's a first party source, she was repeatedly included in interviews with the directors of the games she worked on due to the importance of her contribution to the visual identity of the games (links are to an unofficial translation since the originals aren't online).[11][12][13]
I agree that if only her manga were notable it'd make sense to not have an independent article, but since her work in manga and games are mostly separate and stand on their own I think it's appropriate to have an article for her as a creator. I think the sources here make a case for notability, but if you think not please tell me. (and sorry for not rounding them up earlier, looking at other manga artists I saw several with a single ANN reference unchallenged and thought that was enough.) --Polm23 (talk) 06:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

John Harris (wide receiver)[edit]

John Harris (wide receiver) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "John Harris (wide receiver)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

fails WP:NGRIDIRON and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 02:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

*Delete Not seeing anything beyond routine coverage (signings, stats, etc.). Does not pass WP:GNG, WP:NCOLLATH, or WP:NGRIDIRON. ~ RobTalk 13:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Zazaro TV[edit]

Zazaro TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Zazaro TV" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Unable to find sources why this is significant or important. The web URL provided in the original edit no longer works (another link is zazaro.com, and here it is from several years ago), and there's a Youtube channel, likely not enough. TheGGoose (talk) 23:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Be&D[edit]

Be&D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Be&D" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

It may've been associated with notables but I'm finding anything to suggest improvement including better sourcing, with the best results here, here, here and here. Pinging past editors @Meatsgains, Mean as custard, and Hmains:. SwisterTwister talk 23:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

BC Biomedical Laboratories Ltd.[edit]

BC Biomedical Laboratories Ltd. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "BC Biomedical Laboratories Ltd." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I'm not entirely sure if this is fully notable and my searches found nothing better with the best results here, here and here. There's aso no obviously good move target with the two links being List of companies of Canada and former employee Arun Garg. SwisterTwister talk 23:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:33, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:34, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Speciality (album). I don't usually close AFDs I !vote in but there's absolutely no point dragging this on for the next entire week, Overall consensus is to redirect. (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 03:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Sanctuary (Nami Tamaki song)[edit]


Sanctuary (Nami Tamaki song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Sanctuary (Nami Tamaki song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. Richhoncho (talk) 23:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. It was not in the article (so this is a good-faith nom), but the song charted for five weeks, reaching #12. I've added that to the article, with reference. TJRC (talk) 21:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Calathan (talk) 21:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Speciality (album). All the singles related to that one can be housed there where the album reached number one, and has a greater chance of getting background information on the single. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 00:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Speciality (album) per Angus - I'm not entirely sure whether charting on Oricon is all that notable ?, But either way considering it's a 2006 song it's had plenty of time to be improved so meh makes sense to redirect ,–Davey2010Talk 01:26, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Speciality (album). Given the total absence of any third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage, the article fails the notability criteria outlined at WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. --DAJF (talk) 03:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Chris Jones (filmmaker)[edit]

Chris Jones (filmmaker) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Chris Jones (filmmaker)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Not notable enough for Wikipedia and cannot find many sources to support his relevance/notability for Wikipedia. Possibly written by the subject himself. Sheroddy (talk) 23:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Heather Beck[edit]

Heather Beck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Heather Beck" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Long-time troubled article from January 2007 with no significant improvement since and my searches found nothing better than indie blogs with browser searches. IMDb claims she's won a few awards but I'm seeing anything to weigh that. Pinging the only still active tagger and therefore presumably interested Mandarax. SwisterTwister talk 22:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete She has published ebooks, although not with major publishers. Her Amazon.com bio [16] reads a lot like the Wikipedia page. But until some reliable media outlets about her up (or she wins the Man Booker prize) this should be deleted.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Adirondack Children's Troupe[edit]

Adirondack Children's Troupe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Adirondack Children's Troupe" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Local children's theatre group that seems to be closed now (www.adirondackchildrenstroupe.org, no other contact details obviously available) and my searches found no better results than this and this. With no signs of improvement, there's nothing to suggest keeping. Notifying the only still active user and therefore presumbaly interested, Achowat. SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Delete - No references, no indication of nobility. It's been a bad article since I tagged it four years ago, and it's still not worthwhile. Achowat (talk) 21:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Andrew McMaster (songwriter)[edit]

Andrew McMaster (songwriter) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Andrew McMaster (songwriter)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Provided sources are insufficient, sheetmusic.com, discogs, youtube do not show how this artist meets WP:MUSIC. A redirect to the band page might be more appropriate but even then I'm not sure this is anyone more important then a competent professional. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 22:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Please note that the wiki article, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Using_sheet_music_sources, was used for referencing the sheet music at sheetmusic.com. Also, references for the actual printed sheet music were included for the two UK top 20 songs for which McMaster was both the sole composer and lyricist, which would appear to satisfy the general notability criteria when allied with his other writing credits with Ducks Deluxe, James Dewar and Anita Harris. The Discogs references were included as they show actual pictures of the vinyl labels, which show the songwriter's name and confirm the printed info about the writer provided by Discogs. The sole YouTube reference is only used to verify McMaster's first single, which if considered a weak reference could certainly be removed. Genspeak (talk) 23:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

You are aware that was a proposal and not a passed guideline? Hell in a Bucket (talk) 02:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

As far as I can see, it still is a proposal but the talk consensus does seem to favour it. Genspeak (talk) 07:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep - for full disclosure, I'm the editor who approved this article for the mainspace through the AfC process. WP:COMPOSER states as its first criteria: "Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition." McMasters has at least 2 works which meet this criteria, "Airport" and "Dancing the Night Away". And there are two others who might be notable: "Forget About You" and "Tenement Steps". Discogs establishes his relationship to two of the notable songs, and BMI is pretty authoritative. Onel5969 TT me 22:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Ambarrukmo Plaza[edit]

Ambarrukmo Plaza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Ambarrukmo Plaza" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Disputed PROD on a mall because of size. Can't find any reliable sources(fails WP:GNG). The official site[17] indicates a different size than the article of only 45,000 m2. Me5000 (talk) 21:32, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete: non-notable shopping mall. Quis separabit? 22:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Akmerkez[edit]

Akmerkez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Akmerkez" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Disputed PROD on a mall because of the size. Can't find any reliable sources(fails WP:GNG) and after some searching the best I could find was this[18] indicating that the size mentioned is actually the total area and the total gross leasable area is only 357,846 square feet. Me5000 (talk) 21:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Now (The Carpenters song)[edit]

Now (The Carpenters song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Now (The Carpenters song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. Richhoncho (talk) 19:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep or merge to Voice of the Heart where the single is also discussed. This is part of a collection and Wikipedia has a complete book on The Carpenters, so keeping a redirect is important here. This was a very significant group, handle with care. I looked around for references, but it is impossible to search for the term "Now". --Cheers-- 009o9 (talk) 22:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:46, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Talkcyprus[edit]

Talkcyprus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Talkcyprus" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Internet forum that lacks notability or indications of importance. It seems it shut down between the article's creation date and today. TheGGoose (talk) 18:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 19:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

One Way V.A.[edit]

One Way V.A. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "One Way V.A." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Article lacks sources that indicate notability. Couldn't find any details of it at all elsewhere, but I might not call it a hoax yet. TheGGoose (talk) 18:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete I can't find anything to establish notability. Me5000 (talk) 15:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

List of American and Canadian cities by minor professional sports franchises[edit]

List of American and Canadian cities by minor professional sports franchises (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "List of American and Canadian cities by minor professional sports franchises" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

1)It was created years ago by an account that has not been active since 2012.
2)A better page with more guidelines has been created at List of minor sports teams in the United States by city and is actually listed by the census metro areas it is linked to (i.e., San Jose is part of the San Francisco Bay Area on the official census).
3)Is named US and Canada, yet there are no Canadian cities listed.
4)The page is very outdated and does not specify how minor a minor league team should be (there are at least 100 minor league baseball teams if you count AZ leagues and college summer leagues and independent leagues).
5)It has been orphaned since its creation with no attempts at integration, the above mentioned page has been created since then and is slightly better (only a bit). Yosemiter (talk) 02:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Herald of Galactus[edit]

Herald of Galactus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Herald of Galactus" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

We already have specific articles for those characters. The cronology and nature of their work with Galactus can be simply described in that article, Galactus. Note that this isn't an actual supergroup but a role of a character. It's like having an article "leader of the Avengers" or "Captain of the USS Enterprise" Cambalachero (talk) 01:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep - Let this page stay. The page was originally created to list the full details of the entire group, it's known membership, and the group's appearance in different media appearance. --Rtkat3 (talk) 02:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep or merge back into Galactus where it was for a couple of years. BOZ (talk) 15:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:G5. (article deleted by Sphilbrick(Talk)) Ashenai (talk) 15:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Young Conservatives[edit]

Young Conservatives (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Young Conservatives" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete per WP:G5. Creator is sock of indeffed user Kbabej. -- WV 01:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy delete (added tag accordingly). WP:G5 is a speedy deletion criterion, and only very minor edits were added by other users. --Ashenai (talk) 03:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure what protocol is, but this appears to be a valid disambiguation page, regardless of who created it. If deleted it would have to be recreated in substantially the same form. That seems a bit silly. olderwiser 13:11, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Young Conservatives (website)[edit]

Young Conservatives (website) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Young Conservatives (website)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete per WP:G5 -- creator is a sock account of indeffed user Kbabej. -- WV 01:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:07, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete The question of the blocked article creator does not mean that the article/topic fails notability. My problem with the article is that this new article is purportedly about "an American conservative political website", but the handful of reliable, secondary sources in the article are about a couple of rap songs produced by the two prep school boys who started the website, (the videos are apparently hosted on the website). The website may be notable, I have not idea. If some young conservative or Good Samaritan finds reliable secondary sources supporting notability as a "conservative political website" flag me. Because I can imagine a WP:HEYYMAN situation here. It's just, I'm not seeing one.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Mónica Hernández[edit]

Mónica Hernández (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Mónica Hernández" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non notable judoka. Has never competed at a world championship or Olympics, lost her only 2 matches at the Pan-Am Games, and is currently ranked only 67th[19]. She also lacks the significant coverage required by GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 17:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Actually she didn't qualify for the Pan-Am games. The results you mentioned are from this year's Pam Am championships (which had only 7 competitors in her division). It's easy to get those two confused. Papaursa (talk) 02:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 21:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete I think her inability to qualify for the Pan-Am games, world championships, or Olympics explains her ranking. An article in the local paper is not enough to show she meets WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 02:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete As above. Did not compete at the highest level. The 67th ranking is telling.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep: passes WP:GNG with significant coverage here, here, and here. Vrac (talk) 15:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Keep Per above. And while the Central American and Caribbean Games may be her most important competition to date, it garners significant coverage in the region, as it is the third most important multi-sport event for the participating countries after the Olympics and the Pan American Games. With that said, I would've normally agreed to her deletion had she simply just competed and nothing more, but she obtained a couple of medals. And by the way, she did qualify for the Pan American Games this year in Toronto, but a last minute injury prevented her from attending. It is explained here. Just saying. -- Lancini87 (talk) 21:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Kenichi Mochizuki[edit]

Kenichi Mochizuki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Kenichi Mochizuki" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I checked ANN and GamePlaza Haruka. While the actor has a bunch of roles, they are all supporting or guest roles, so it is not clear what role he is most famous for to meet WP:ENT. JA wikipedia does not have any useful information to beef up the article. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 01:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Bethany K. Scanlon[edit]

Bethany K. Scanlon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Bethany K. Scanlon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:BASIC with no secondary sources, just links to her profile pages on Amazon and LibraryThing. No suggestion that Scanlon meets any criteria of WP:NAUTHOR. McGeddon (talk) 17:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 19:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Kalle Sauerland[edit]

Kalle Sauerland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Kalle Sauerland" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Subject was previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nisse Sauerland. The coverage is not enough to meet GNG. It consists of passing mentions and him promoting his fighters. Notability is not obtained simply by doing your job, even if it's relatively high profile.Mdtemp (talk) 17:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete: previously deleted and recreated without significant improvement to establish notability. Quis separabit? 18:57, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 21:32, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep; I don't consider this and this as "passing mentions". Other sources include this, this and this (as well as this one in Polish), which I admit are minor but do indicate a trend that he is notable in his field of work, apart from passing WP:GNG. The previous AfD discussion referred to above actually pertains to his brother's article. In any case, I was convinced I improved upon the previous article by including more substantial referencing, which I feel is being ignored this time around. Thank you, CesareAngelotti (talk) 23:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
He, along with his father, was discussed at the previous AfD. The father is notable, the kids were not. Even the article you cite doesn't really mention him until near the end--after general discussions of boxing and his father's accomplishments. The only coverage coverage seems to be about the Super Six tournament which involved 6 promoters and an agreement between his father's company and Showtime. At most that's WP:BLP1E or merits a redirect to his father's page.Mdtemp (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Michael Kuhr[edit]

Michael Kuhr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Michael Kuhr" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

None of the kickboxing claims have sources and I was not able to find independent sources to confirm them. If he was champion of all those professional organizations, he's definitely notable as a kickboxer. The other sources appear to be more passing mentions because his agency was involved in the investigation of the poker tournament robbery.Mdtemp (talk) 16:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Only snippet view is available, but this German-language book from 1992 (some kind of "year in review" type of publication by the official government archive of Berlin) refers to Kuhr defending a kickboxing title against a fighter named Bogdan Sawicki in that city that year. These two German-language periodicals (Zitty and Focus) also appear to refer to him as a kickboxing champion, though again, only snippet view is available. I can't verify those specific titles, but he does seem to be a notable figure, who's receiving significant coverage in German-language sources in his role as a celebrity bodyguard Die Welt, B.Z., Klatsch & Tratsch, etc. As such, I'd lean toward Keep. -208.81.148.195 (talk) 17:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
The problem is that the source doesn't say what organization's title he won. There are dozens of small organizations whose titles do not confer notability. Papaursa (talk) 02:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 21:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep I have added a source to the article supporting the claim he won significant pro kickboxing titles. Papaursa (talk) 02:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:56, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Nusrat Faria Mazhar[edit]

Nusrat Faria Mazhar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Nusrat Faria Mazhar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

WP:TOOSOON. Acted in some commercials and signed in the MoU for two films which have not been released yet. Most of the sources are not reliable, some are WP:INTERVIEWs and some just passing mentions. Arr4 (talk) 16:31, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Probably delete for now as, although I can't speak well here with the non-English sources, my own and searches and looking at the currently listed give no impression of better notability so we'll wait for it to happen (there's also no move target). SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 00:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Skills for Change[edit]

Skills for Change (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Skills for Change" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Deleted as expired PROD. I restored it per an email objecting to the deletion, but there is not much evidence of notability so bringing to AfD for full discussion. Rlendog (talk) 16:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Comment - Here is an article about them [26]. Looked for more but the rest were quick mentions or announcements. I will check some archives when I have access later in the day.--TTTommy111 (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete: promotional. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:42, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Gateway Center (Brooklyn)[edit]

Gateway Center (Brooklyn) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Gateway Center (Brooklyn)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non notable mall fails WP:GNG Me5000 (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete: as non-notable shopping mall. Quis separabit? 17:32, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Edgewater Commons[edit]

Edgewater Commons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Edgewater Commons" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non notable mall fails WP:GNG Me5000 (talk) 16:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:33, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom by date of death[edit]

List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom by date of death (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom by date of death" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Same concerns apply as the recent decision to delete List of Prime Ministers of the United Kingdom by date of birth, namely cruftiness and OR. Chrism would like to hear from you 13:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment So I see that you don't contest the claim that this is listcruft... --Randykitty (talk) 15:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment It isn't listcruft. Boy Named Stu (talk) 15:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep, doesn't seem like cruft to me, either. -208.81.148.195 (talk) 17:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:15, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:41, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep Once again my argument is the same in this as it is the other debates on British PMs. Highly notable topics do not qualify as WP:LISTCRUFT. Halftime Hero (talk) 04:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Static (Huntress album)[edit]

Static (Huntress album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Static (Huntress album)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Not notable. Future album lacking coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment. It's out in a few weeks. Their last album received about enough coverage to be considered notable, so it would seem that there's a good chance that this one will too. Personally I'd leave it until a couple of weeks after release and deal with it if there's no coverage by that point. --Michig (talk) 07:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Overall consensus is to Keep for now, If sources don't improvement then I guess Merging would the next best option but we'll see how it goes (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 01:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

As If (album)[edit]

As If (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "As If (album)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Not released until October - insufficient coverage in reliable sources to justify article now - WP:TOOSOON ukexpat (talk) 12:28, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:18, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Possible Keep. This early interview from the magazine Spin is majorly about the album, and a lot of reviews from independent sources should be published once the LP is released. 和DITOREtails
  • Keep. Enough coverage already to keep it at least for 6 or 7 weeks until it has been released. In addition to the SPIN article above there's FACT, DIY, Pitchfork, Glasswerk. If it didn't get any more coverage than that when it's released, then we would possibly be looking at a merge to the band, but let's face it, that isn't going to happen. --Michig (talk) 07:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Kishor Satya[edit]

Kishor Satya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Kishor Satya" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete. Fails WP:ENT. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 12:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete: fails notability, GNG. Quis separabit? 22:56, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep demonstrably meets both WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER, specifically point one of the latter, which says: "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." According to this source, which he is the subject of, he has played the lead in four tv serials. He gets a feature piece here in The Hindu, which covers WP:GNG. This source mentions him getting best actor at the Asianet awards. This source mentions him as one of the co-stars in another serial. Other mentions in passing like this suggest someone who's notable and I strongly suspect that there would be more in foreign language sources. Valenciano (talk) 00:02, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Ang Iglesia Metodista sa Pilipinas[edit]

Ang Iglesia Metodista sa Pilipinas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Ang Iglesia Metodista sa Pilipinas" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, relies too much on primary sources and original research (which includes citations that are mostly prescriptive/dogmatic rather than descriptive of the subject matter). In addition, based on the talk page, its primary editors have a close personal involvement to the subject of the article (Fails Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and qualifies as WP:PROMOTION).

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • K°eep. The denomination's founding was reported in the US.[27] StAnselm (talk) 04:05, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep: but must be cleaned up of any POV/OR (which I will work on). It essentially describes a denomination which exists in the Philippines and has no other immediately related-articles. Quis separabit? 17:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Limbo (Kylie Minogue song)[edit]

Limbo (Kylie Minogue song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Limbo (Kylie Minogue song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NSONGS totally. No independent coverage in third party reliable sources, no chart performance, no independent live coverage, performances, academic discussions etc. All that is present in the name of third party sources are the some reviews of album, and a bunch of CD single and 7" single liner notes. This should be deleted or at best as a plausible redirect to the album article. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 08:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:11, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 10:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. Enough information and reliable sources discussing the song that probably wouldn't all fit on the album article. Also, I doubt reasoning of "no chart performance" is a good-enough reason for an article to be deleted. Other alternatives would be to redirect or merge to the album article. 和DITOREtails 05:53, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Impossible Princess, concur that it fails WP:NSONGS. Discussion in sources is generally limited to a brief mention in larger pieces that are about the album as a whole. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC).
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:30, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Jump (Kylie Minogue song)[edit]

Jump (Kylie Minogue song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Jump (Kylie Minogue song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NSONGS totally. No independent coverage in third party reliable sources, no chart performance, no independent live coverage, performances, academic discussions etc. This should be deleted or at best as a plausible redirect to the album article. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 08:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:17, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 10:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I Don't Need Anyone[edit]

I Don't Need Anyone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "I Don't Need Anyone" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NSONGS totally. No independent coverage in third party reliable sources, no chart performance, no independent live coverage, performances, academic discussions etc. Also there are original research claims in the article about the song being a promotional single. This should be deleted or at best as a plausible redirect to the album article. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 08:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 10:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Too Far (Kylie Minogue song)[edit]

Too Far (Kylie Minogue song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Too Far (Kylie Minogue song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NSONGS totally. No independent coverage in third party reliable sources, no chart performance, no independent live coverage, performances, academic discussions etc. This should be deleted or at best as a plausible redirect to the album article. Another point, even most of the content regarding the background corresponds to the album article only. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 08:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - appearing on multiple Kylie Greatest Hits albums, being almost a single but pulled at the last minute and featuring coverage in reliable sources (although not all the ones currently in the article are, citing the sleeve notes of the Impossible Princess is fine, unless you somehow believe they were made up and full of untruths) is good enough for me. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:52, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 10:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Adaptive coordinate descent[edit]

Adaptive coordinate descent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Adaptive coordinate descent" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable. The main paper about this method has been cited a mere 13 times according to GScholar. The content of the article was previously removed from the article Coordinate descent because it was deemed promotional.

PROD contested by an anonymous editor. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I am the original author of the method and article. My comment was: "The article explains the concept of performing coordinate descent with an adaptive coordinate system with support of a few illustrations. Citations index is a weak argument. It would be better to extend the description of old and new relevant approaches." I would be glad to know your arguments to support article deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.70.22.235 (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

The academic article or the wikipedia article?--Savonneux (talk) 11:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:26, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. The Pavlov paper describes the method in reasonable depth [28] and is independent of what the nominator calls "the main paper" as far as I know. It would just scrape through the notability requirement on that alone, but I note that Pavlov predates (2006) "the main paper" (2011) so that is clearly not the original source of the method, hence is likely independent of the original source also, and hence also counts towards notability. I also note that there are several mentions in gbooks results and that a paper by Tasadduq et al. describes the method as "well-known". Having said that, it is a truly awful encyclopaedia article as it completely fails to give any context to the general reader of what the article is actually about. However, such failings are not grounds for deletion here. SpinningSpark 11:52, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
    • @Spinningspark: Pavlov's Algorithm 1 and Loshchilov's Algorithm 3 look entirely different, solve different problems, and Loshchilov doesn't cite Pavlov at all. These appear to be distinct algorithms that just happen to have the same name. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 21:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
      • I don't pretend to understand this material, but to my mind any algorithm that repeatedly changes coordinates in order to converge on a desired result can sensibly be called adaptive coordinate descent. It does not matter that an entirely different algorithm is being used to solve an entirely different problem. The article currently makes no coherent attempt to define its own scope. Until it does, I think I am entitled to assume the widest scope possible. That combined with several book sources and papers (Theodoridis, Glasmachers and Dogan. Hlupic, Tasadduq et al.) directly referencing Loshchilov in the context of adaptive coordinate descent scrapes it through notability for me. SpinningSpark 15:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Conflict of interest? Original research? - must be provided on the talk page of the article. The article can still remain part of the encyclopedia if it is written from a neutral point of view but no one can promote their own research by creating an article about it.
Comment - the article creator's username implies a close connection to this topic and article. His/her edit history suggests that the creation of the account may have been for the purpose of creating this article.
  Bfpage |leave a message  20:32, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 10:19, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Abordo[edit]

Abordo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Abordo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No assertion of adequate notability. Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails general notability guidelines and WP:NALBUM. JbhTalk 14:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 19:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 10:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Umeka Shōji[edit]

Umeka Shōji (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Umeka Shōji" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable voice actor. Only found one news article announcing her role in World Trigger and it was for some supporting characters. She is also supposedly a singer but none of her works have been listed on her Oricon profile. Too soon to have a Wikipedia article. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:19, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your input. I've confirmed Deception IV and Tokimeki Memorial 4 from their websites. The God Eater ones I'm not sure since they have like 10 different voices for the main character. And Samurai Warriors is a massive ensemble cast which makes it difficult to figure out. Based on the Deception IV and Tokimeki Memorial 4, is that good enough to pass WP:ENT? AngusWOOF (barksniff) 13:48, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
I've confirmed Samurai Warriors ensemble roles. Takenaka Hanbei looks like a major character for Samurai Warriors 3 at least by newly introduced characters (still 40 of them total, but she voices 2 of the newer ones). AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:15, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: Japan is better than the US about covering voice actors, but it's still possible for someone to voice some major characters without actually gaining a ton of coverage. The big thing we should be looking at are the roles: were they major characters in a notable game/film/show? If it's a show, how many episodes were they in? If these are major characters or characters with a lot of screen time, then that'd be something to show notability. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: Game Plaza Haruka's Voice actor database shows her in a bunch of media. Is that enough to show she is notable? [29] AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:16, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 10:18, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Godzilla vs. Frankenstein[edit]

Godzilla vs. Frankenstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Godzilla vs. Frankenstein" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The film never materialized beyond a concept. Fails WP:NFF. Koala15 (talk) 20:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Alliterated:(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Furankenshutain tai Gojira" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
Studio:(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Toho Film Studios, Godzilla vs. Frankenstein" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
began screenplay:(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Shinichi Sekizawa, Godzilla vs. Frankenstein" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
completed it:(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Takeshi Kimura, Godzilla vs. Frankenstein" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
  • Keep in some manner. Perhaps merge and redirect somewhere. I am finding through searches that, even if never made, the topic of this abandoned film has the level of commentary and analysis to meet our basic inclusion criteria, but I am in quandary as to whether or not it merits a separate article or of we should be discussing just where else and how much of this could be merged somewhere for a redirect. I am thinking it could be spoken of in detail at Godzilla (franchise). Thoughts? Schmidt, Michael Q. 07:40, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 10:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

MatchMove[edit]

MatchMove (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "MatchMove" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

WP:CORP has a couple mentions in press releases and the like, for example: [30]. The real thing though is that one cannot find any kind of WP:RS information to add to the article if one wanted to outside of a basic description of what they do (some sort of prepaid cards).

I did remove a bunch of links to advertising for the company before nominating this, for transparencies sake. Savonneux (talk) 09:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Dansk Jernbane[edit]

Dansk Jernbane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Dansk Jernbane" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

I'm not Danish so I hope we can get some insight into this possibly non-notable company that has existed since July 2006 (basically the same content) and, at best, this could be mentoned at CFL's article (the Dansk article was moved to CFL Cargo here as well). To the best of my abilities, I searched for sources and found nothing good. Notifying tagger Davey2010. SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Indeed it seems this translates to Danish Railway as other articles have the word "jernbane" as well. SwisterTwister talk 20:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
So we're a bit fucked source wise Face-grin.svg, Would be nice if a Danish person showed up lol. –Davey2010Talk 20:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Move to CFL Cargo Denmark - Not gonna lie the whole naming thing is a tad confusing but there we go, Seems better to Move instead of merging to I guess an irrelevant article, Can't be bothered to fiddle with all the above so take this as my final answer lol. –Davey2010Talk 02:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: If kept it should be moved to CFL Cargo Denmark, as the company got a new name in 2006/07. Same owner then and now (directly or indirecly, not totally clear to me presently): CFL, hence the name which in Danish is CFL Cargo Danmark ApS (ApS=Ltd/LLC). If you want to search for sources on the pre-2007 name include ApS and in quotes: "Dansk Jernbane ApS". Otherwise you could very well end up with a great deal of confusion with Danske Statsbaner. I'm not overly impressed with the hits we get. Leaving out the ApS "Dansk Jernbane" is challenging as you will get hits on dansk jernbane which is simply "Danish railway" and not a proper noun. I'll try to look into it later. Did this help? -- Sam Sailor Talk! 23:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

BPI Energy[edit]

BPI Energy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "BPI Energy" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The first AfD was keep (but standards have changed since then) and sure it has sources and I could've let this pass by but my searches found nothing good to suggest better improvement (mostly for Building Performance Institute (BPI). I'm not sure how much activity they've had with their bankruptcy but, again, I found nothing to suggest much good and they seem to no longer be listed at the stock exchanges. Finally, emphasizing their low profile, this article has literally not been edited since August 2011 much less significantly. Pinging the only still active user Eastmain. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. Once notable, always notable. The litigation with Drummond Company was commented on by two different lawyers at Lexology. Google News isn't very helpful, though. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 04:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Lisa Moren Bromma[edit]

Lisa Moren Bromma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Lisa Moren Bromma" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

As unfortunately, my searches found no better sources with the best results here, here and here. The article may seem acceptable in a way (especially compared to other articles) but there's nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Narmadeeya Brahmins[edit]

Narmadeeya Brahmins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Narmadeeya Brahmins" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Although this may be because sources are not accessible, I found nothing to suggest improvement to this article from July 2007 with the best results here (which has a little information but not much) and, in any case, this would be best mentioned elsewhere. SwisterTwister talk 05:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Isabel Gallardo[edit]

Isabel Gallardo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Isabel Gallardo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable person. She is mentioned in the cited source only once, in the appendix, which is simply a list of several hundred names that appeared in the Venona Cables. The sum total of what the source says about her is as follows: "Chilean, married to the American Lorren Hay, a Marine captain. Worked for the KGB on projects involving Chile." This is very far from the level of coverage in RS that is required to make someone notable: it is a passing mention, not significant coverage in a reliable source. I'm unable to find any other coverage of her in a reliable source. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Fyddlestix (talk) 05:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 05:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 05:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 05:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Chile-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 05:10, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete: Does not appear to meet WP:BIO or any other relevant criteria. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Haruna Rei[edit]

Haruna Rei (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Haruna Rei" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "玲はる名" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

A relatively young tanka poet who has published some poems and been mentioned in a few blogs, but no significant independent RS on her. The book mentioned in the article is self-published, as is her Blue Train magazine. The text of the article itself is taken word for word from the Amazon author description [37], and thus could be a candidate for speedy deletion as advertising. I think it fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:GNG, but the poetry community in Japan is rather rarefied, so perhaps an expert opinion is necessary. Michitaro (talk) 04:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:47, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete, subject to change to "neutral" if new evidence of notability comes to light. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

The New Climate Economy Report[edit]

The New Climate Economy Report (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "The New Climate Economy Report" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This article appears to be nothing more than a facsimile of the subject itself, parroting the content of each section of the document under identical section titles. 67.14.236.50 (talk) 04:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:55, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. Even if this were a notable document, which I don't think it is, there is nothing here which should be in the resulting article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Kent Matthes[edit]

Kent Matthes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Kent Matthes" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable minor league baseball player. Wizardman 02:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·C) 03:26, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable.--Yankees10 01:28, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Pop-fly to first base as far as notability goes: Fails WP:BASEBALL/N, no evidence of meeting other notability criteria. "Yer out!" davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Heli Attack 3[edit]

Heli Attack 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Heli Attack 3" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search (Gamezone hit was a repackaged press release and the other stuff was just listings and PR). JIG review is a paragraph long and the rest are unreliable sources. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. – czar 02:20, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 07:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - I agree that notability hasn't been clearly established. The links in the articles right now seem to go to unreliable sources. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 06:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

BajeYout[edit]

BajeYout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "BajeYout" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

My searches found nothing good at all and the best thing I found was this and it's worth mentioning the website is now closed so all signs seem to suggest this magazine closed (no significant edits since starting in March 2007 and it's orphaned). Notifying author CaribDigita. SwisterTwister talk 02:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Vietnamese Constitutional Monarchist League[edit]

Vietnamese Constitutional Monarchist League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Vietnamese Constitutional Monarchist League" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

This organization is not in any way affiliated with the Vietnamese Monarchy movement. It has no sources, and was created by the same user who created the (also non-sourced) article about this organization's president Nguyễn Phúc Bửu Chánh, believed to be an impostor who sells "titles" for money. This article is only a front for that business. There's reading about it here, here, and here. Cagepanes (talk) 00:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Cagepanes (talk) 01:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cagepanes (talk) 01:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Cagepanes (talk) 01:05, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment to the nominator, Cagepanes: If you believe the page is purely promotional, please consider adding the appropriate cleanup tags, or rewriting the article. Doing so may affect the outcome of this AFD. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Added the tags just now. Good suggestion. --Cagepanes (talk) 03:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Laureen Harper[edit]

Laureen Harper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Laureen Harper" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Not sure why there is an article on this person. Other than her marriage to Stephen Harper she meets none of the standard WP:Notability requirements. Recommend Delete or Redirect to the Stephen Harper article. Suttungr (talk) 01:09, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Bates family[edit]

Bates family (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Bates family" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Reality TV star with little notability in his own right, perhaps only as part of his family. Not enough specific notability to warrant many external references. Westroopnerd (talk) 00:09, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment The linked article is on the family as a whole, not on any individual in the family. So the argument does not make sense.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Judith Hunt (consultant)[edit]

Judith Hunt (consultant) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Judith Hunt (consultant)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Simply not notable for Wikipedia Sheroddy (talk) 22:44, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Comment. Something seems to have gone wrong here - I wanted to nominate the article about Judith Hunt (consultant) for deletion, not Judith Hunt (illustrator). Could somebody please help me change this as the Cyberbot has nominated the wrong article?--Sheroddy (talk) 23:05, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

@Sheroddy: I think I've fixed it, the links now go to the correct article. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 23:59, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

John LaMotta[edit]

John LaMotta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "John LaMotta" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete: as non-notable actor. Quis separabit? 00:55, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete or redirect to ALF (as it seems it was his best work) and my searches definitely found nothing to suggest independent notability here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 06:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Kitty Swink[edit]

Kitty Swink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Kitty Swink" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete: non-notable actress. Quis separabit? 00:51, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Moe Scharff[edit]

Moe Scharff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Moe Scharff" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Inadequately sourced biography. The only source that I could find was this. Fails WP:BASIC. - MrX 01:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Result was Keep based on the strength of the argument. I wasn't convinced merely by several citations in a low-/mid-circulation newspaper, but this particular national honor makes it almost certain that additional reliable sources exist. The strength of the arguments in the previous AFD only confirms this decision. I will move the page to Jean-Paul Cara after closing this AFD. (non-admin closure) davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 03:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Jean Paul Cara[edit]

Jean Paul Cara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Jean Paul Cara" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Delete: as still insufficiently notable since last nomination. Quis separabit? 00:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Michael Brin Prize in Dynamical Systems[edit]

Michael Brin Prize in Dynamical Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Michael Brin Prize in Dynamical Systems" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Brin Prize" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No indication that the award itself satisfies WP:GNG. Based on the references given and my own search for additional sources, the only coverage appears to be listings of who won the award in a single journal. There appears to be no in-depth coverage of the award itself. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 00:16, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment. Somewhat more coverage turns up using the shorter search string "Brin Prize", visible in the "Find sources" links above. This includes assorted papers reviewing the works of the various award winners. Whether that's enough to keep the article remains for discussion. --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:48, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:49, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. At this point we have plenty of sourcing (more than usual for a mathematical award) in the form of what looks like an entire special issue of a journal (or at least several articles in a single issue) written by other mathematicians and celebrating the mathematical accomplishments that led to the selection of each prizewinner. I don't see any merit in the nominator's attempts to view this coverage as being not about the award itself. I also find it suggestive that Avila's prize was followed in such quick succession by the Fields Medal and that the Guardian article about the 2014 Fields Medal winners found the Brin Prize to be significant enough to list among Avila's past honors. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:05, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Med Standard[edit]

Med Standard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Med Standard" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable startup company recycling medical equipment. Don't be confused by the extreme number of Google hits - Google hits all kinds of "... Med standard" stuff, which has nothing to do with the company. Current sources are blogs, PR websites and a family TV channel - all of them without active URLs. GermanJoe (talk) 00:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete On top of being created by a now blocked sock, references to very dodgy sources, fails Google test. Obviously not notable under WP:GNG. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
    • The article's main content was added by a non-sock (SPA), and the company name is difficult to search - thus the AfD. But I agree of course: without new credible claims of notability this article should be deleted as soon as possible. 2 Goggle searches have failed so far. GermanJoe (talk) 11:21, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete No need to keep this here, as it is on here with questionable grounds. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 15:40, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Zonia Mejia[edit]

Zonia Mejia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Zonia Mejia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG and lacks Reliable third party sources .Is a upcoming Actress a case of WP:TOOSOON. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Maybe delete instead of redirecting to the show as, although I found results such as this, this is vulnerable to BLP issues and there's not much for an article yet. SwisterTwister talk 07:25, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Zang Qianqian[edit]

Zang Qianqian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Zang Qianqian" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Unremarkable underage athlete. Fails WP:NHSPHSATH. Not enough third party coverage to be notable. Maybe once she is gets out of the U18 league, this might change. The Undead Never Die (talk) 00:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are on the same team; and they all fall under the same notability status:

Zhang Yuqian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Qian Jingwen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Li Yingying (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The Undead Never Die (talk) 00:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Ulf Herman[edit]

Ulf Herman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Ulf Herman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

not notable, no sources to verify RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 20:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. --Non-Dropframe talk 20:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. --Non-Dropframe talk 20:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. --Non-Dropframe talk 20:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep - Competed at the fully professional level of his sport. Was part of a major stable in the third biggest promotion in the United States at the peak of its popularity. GaryColemanFan (talk) 14:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
    • Nice proof. No extensive coverage of any of this, mind. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 18:49, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete i think "fully professional" is misleading. There is no amateur version unless you count backyard feds. No really notable achievements as far as i can see. MPJ-US  20:45, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • I did not actually remember his time in ECW, reading through the section he won one' match, a singles match on a house show over a tag team guy. Even his PPV "participation" consisted of him being ringside during someone else's match. So he was in ECW, but ECW was never so big that working for them on a regular basis is enough to establish notability, it's not even close to WWE, more like Ring of Honor. MPJ-US  08:43, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 13:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Unless he was extremely marginal in the group another idea could be to either merge of redirect to The Full Blooded Italians.--174.91.187.234 (talk) 22:39, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 15:29, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Prime Advantage Corporation[edit]

Prime Advantage Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Prime Advantage Corporation" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Trivial awards, refs are PR. No notability. DGG ( talk ) 03:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 07:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 07:51, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment There are some sources that look pretty good,[43][44] but they are primarily about the org's surveys. CorporateM (Talk) 02:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment The resources are solid, including the awards. Perspective on the awards being trivial comes from a librarian, not a professional that understands the manufacturing and supply chain markets. Only four of the 12 references are connected to the company's benchmarked surveys. (Talk) 03:28, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Uncertain as my searches found virtually nothing but the article albeit not entirely good is acceptable I suppose. I'd like to hear from other users to better form my vote. SwisterTwister talk 05:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 13:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete: -- blatant business promotionalism. Quis separabit? 17:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep: -- this page can be improved, but is a worthy example of a Group Purchasing Organization. GPOs are very popular in insurance and manufacturing. Also noteworthy because it is founded by and run by a woman in a male-dominated industry. The founder and her career are referenced in General Managers in Action[1], 1992, by Harvard Professor Frank Aguilar. She is also noted in the book Managing Corporate Ethics[2], also by Frank Aguilar and published in 1994 by Oxford University Press, and in Lessons in Leadership by Charles Bernstein, 1993. In 1987, Harvard Business School published a case study on O'Sullivan and her management challenges at Groen (which is still in use at business schools across the US). GPOsAreReal]] 17:17, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Aguilar, Frank (April 30, 1992). General Managers in Action: Policies and Strategies (Second ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 186, 489-490, 504. ISBN 0195073673. 
  2. ^ Aguilar, Francis (May 12, 1994). Managing Corporate Ethics: Learning from America's Ethical Companies How to Supercharge Business Performance (First Printing edition ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 11. 
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 15:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 08:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Annansi Clothing Co.[edit]

Annansi Clothing Co. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Annansi Clothing Co." – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Non-notable company and my searches found no marginally good evidence of coverage with the best here and here. It seems the author had a habit of not adding many good references (made several articles but not many good sources with them) and I'm not seeing any new evidence of better sources. Sure the article at least has sources and is neatly written but what I can't get past is no additional coverage and there's no good move target. SwisterTwister talk 01:18, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89(T·E·C) 02:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Technically, should be deleted, but see comments - I can't remember what brought me to the article now - I think I came across it in Ghanaian Fashion Designers category while housekeeping List of fashion designers and I think I was trying to find SOME sort of sourcing to make it less instantly non-deletable. The major problem with articles of this type is that African press is not always readily accessible online - I've run into trouble with other African fashion designers where they clearly seem to be notable in their country and recognised, but the sourcing is simply not readily accessible online - it means that sometimes you can barely tell the difference between a notable designer and someone trying to big up a non-notable. The fact that Kofi G. Annan has managed to get his marketing/social media techniques written about in a book about the subject is quite significant; and the further reading links to a significant essay he wrote along similar lines. For an African fashion designer, that sort of online availability of information is pretty amazing. But yes, the problem is that the (very little) of what else is out there is press releases, and there is also an issue that African fashion design is really underrepresented on Wikipedia. But technically, it should be deleted - although with no prejudice against recreation once further sourcing becomes available. Trouble is, this is something that sounds like it ought to pass notability, but there are next to no acceptable AND readily accessible sources. Mabalu (talk) 11:10, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete . A good part of the firms's work and exhibitions have been in the US, so if there are no sources for this either, there's no basis for keeping this article. (If Annan is notable, there could be an article on him) DGG ( talk ) 19:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 13:26, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 15:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Saera (software)[edit]

Saera (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Saera (software)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

No evidence for notability. Creating editor (who deprodded it) describes it on talk page as a "very young project in early stage of development". Appears to be WP:TOOSOON. PamD 08:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep This is vote against deletion of Saera article.
Saera intelligent personal assistant is open source what is significant fact as determines way, style, path, speed of development and no marketing activities but sharing information among users in communities. That was what I was meaning with "very young project in early stage of development", but after 4 of development and serving 4 operating systems it is nothing to be WP:TOOSOON.
Saera is of the same kind as Siri for iOS and Cortana for Windows. Because it is open source it has got no huge money in huge marketing departaments to advertise it, hence sources are limited now to mentioned in the article. Yet still it is notable as this is one of widely known intelligent personall asistant for main and of worldwide range OSes, and this is the only one for Linux MeeGo family which means it is significant for users of MeeGo, Sailfish, Maemo, Nemo systems. It is not any accidental file selector or irrelevant library but personal intelligent assistant with AI elements which still is (and note well: and will be during several years or even decades) under development. Hence used "young stage of development" is used in context of open source development but not context of WP:TOOSOON. A time ago the same situation and similar discussion (and also PROD nomination) was about Jolla and Sailfish OS or Jolla Tablet.
Saera (inteligent persona; assistant) ought to be treated in the same way as Siri or Cortana, hence deleting it is not any acceptable compromise. Resources available for open source project supporters or members or enthusiast and time of development of the Saera determines it is not yet as developed as Siri or Cortana ATM, but it is also not WP:TOOSOON already. Those projects, Siri and Cortana, are financed by 2 of the richest corporations all over the World, while Saera by open community only. Deleting Saera would be a discrimination of project developed according to open source standards in favour to collecting in Wikipedia only articles about and related with rich corporations. That would be discrimination because of owned money what would be unequal treating. The article has not been created in early 2011 but in 2015 after 4 years of development and after reached established position of Saera among users. However it doesn't have all features known from Siri or Cortana yet, it is still the same kind of IT tech, and still under development. Saera is functional, ready to use and available for interested in. Verifiable sources has been mentioned, even when there are not many of them still.
Don't delete Saera (intelligent personal assistant).Ocexyz (talk) 19:32, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete: have found no independent sources to show notability. Fails WP:GNG and moreover the essay WP:NSOFT. BethNaught (talk) 08:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Incorrect, the independent source link is #4 Noori, Sepehr James. "Personal Assistant on Jolla and Sailfish OS". http://www.jollausers.com. JollaUsers. Retrieved 10 August 2015. And published a half a year ago, before PROD. Mentioned above policy is fulfilled/complied. Ocexyz (talk) 12:10, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
That link is not in-depth and moreover is to encourage people to donate. Still not enough for notability. BethNaught (talk) 12:21, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 13:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep: This is vote against deletion of Saera article. Deletion or moving the article to elsewhere will disable maintining and developing this article. This also would disable other, then me, contributors to improve it. WP:IAR.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ocexyz (talkcontribs)
NB This editor has already !voted above.
No two keeps please.. Regards—JAaron95 Talk 15:15, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 15:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Chinese black monday[edit]

Chinese black monday (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Chinese black monday" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Can see no reason (as yet) for this to exist as an article separate from 2015 Chinese stock market crash, in my opinion a story with a long way to go. There may well be blacker Mondays or indeed Wednesdays ahead. Black Monday is merely the headline created by a very unimaginative sub-editor, which is why I do not think this worthy of a redirect. TheLongTone (talk) 12:54, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Re-name Black Monday 2015 Chinese state media is calling it "Black Monday". International commentators starting to call it Black Monday as hundreds of billions of notable dollars go down toilet. Suggest name change discussion more appropriate than deletion. Guru Noel (talk) 18:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC) 18:08, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Probably Renamed Simply as Black Monday or Merged with Chinese Stock Market Crash I dont know put it could Renamed as Black Monday that right now that also effect outside of China as well, However its only create Positive effect on Oil to decreased prices for short time? 2606:A000:85E7:4E00:6DC0:1FC6:C31:B6E7 (talk) 19:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOTNEWS - worth a paragraph in the existing article 2015 Chinese stock market crash, but no more than that. We don't create an article every time a stock market somewhere drops or rises by a few percent points. -Zanhe (talk) 08:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Hang fire for now This may not even be the worst day. The article is premature, but we have articles on such days on Wall Street, so likely we will eventually have one on this day. User:Fred Bauder Talk 08:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Hang fire for now - its too early to tell whether the event is notable. Review after two weeks. Then most likely then merge with Chinese Stock Market Crash 2015.Jonpatterns (talk) 09:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete per Zanhe. 61.3.106.89 (talk) 10:14, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment They call it Stormy Monday, but Tuesday's just as bad. Wednesday's worse.... I can't really see the point of a standalone article: this day is so obviouisly part of a larger story that a standalone would have to include much material from 2015 Chinese stock market crash to make any sense. As for Black Monday....Clichegate.TheLongTone (talk) 13:07, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect to 2015 Chinese stock market crash: Currently serves as a content fork. There isn't a reason to have separate pages when the later events can be placed in an article subsection. --benlisquareTCE 11:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Hang fire for now per Fred Bauder and Jonpatterns. Notability (or lack thereof) of the subject would be clearer in 2-3 weeks. --Joshua Issac (talk) 15:09, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: Are the Chinese Government now trying to censor bad news on Wikipedia by stealth?! -- Urquhartnite (talk) 23:48, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
    • Not in any substantial way, however this particular subject is a good example of one that might be, as panic is not a good thing; press coverage is muted in China, by government directive. User:Fred Bauder Talk 16:28, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:54, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Merge to 2015 Chinese stock market crash , this is an unnecessary fork. --Tom (LT) (talk) 04:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep and I would support expansion into how it impacted global markets... considering how the DJIA lost over 1000 points in 3 days and then kept falling for several days after that, this is more than just China's bad day. MPS (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
  • @MPS: There's already an article, 2015 stock market selloff, about the global selloff (which has more info about Black Monday than the stub we're discussing). And there is 2015 Chinese stock market crash about the Chinese crash; both articles are relatively well developed. We don't need a third article about the same event. -Zanhe (talk) 19:32, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Order of a polynomial[edit]

Order of a polynomial (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Order of a polynomial" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

The title is usurpatory, as it has several common meanings, none corresponding to the content of the article. This cannot be solved by moving the article, because of the multiple issues listed in the talk page: the concept is not well defined. The only possible definition that fits the examples is not a property of the polynomial, but of an auxiliary basis. The article refers to a unique source, which is a book about splines, a different subject. It seems that the article is a WP:OR tentative to generalize the well defined notion of "order of of a spline interpolation", which is based on a misunderstanding of this notion. In any case, the article content is either WP:OR or non-notable, and, thus, cannot be saved for making an encyclopedic article. D.Lazard (talk) 10:02, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Comment In spline theory, the order of a spline is a well-defined concept; it is the number of knots needed to define a spline. I think this was de Boor's use of the term. In the more general case of polynomials, order is sometimes used as a synonym for degree. There is also the multiplicative order of a polynomial. Given the different uses of the term, it may be better to turn this into a disambiguation page. --Mark viking (talk) 17:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. Incoherent, and apparently OR. There might be several notions of the "order of a polynomial", but they are not what is described in this article. --Sammy1339 (talk) 02:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete. A disambiguation page for this title makes sense, but I do not know what to do with the contents of this page. A delete seems to be the cleanest way to make room for a proper page. Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 17:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep. I don't use mathematics professionally, but enjoy playing about. The term 'order of a polynomial' was familiar to me from high-school maths 20 years ago, and seemed to more or less match the definition given in the article; I understand from the discussion above that this should be referred to as the 'degree', but acknowledging the difference in use around the world is worthwhile. I note that Wolfram uses order of a polynomial in the same sense that this page intends. So, I'm argue for retaining it.Klbrain (talk) 22:07, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment. Look a little more closely at this page. In the example given, a degree one polynomial has order n, thus degree and order are not being used as synonyms contrary to what Wolfram is saying. The fact that the article led you astray speaks against keeping it.Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Tanvir Ahmed Khan[edit]

Tanvir Ahmed Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(‹See Tfm› Find sources: "Tanvir Ahmed Khan" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · highbeam · JSTOR)

Granted, there's always a possibility of non-accessible sources but my searches simply found nothing better with searches at Books, News, browser, highbeam, thefreelibrary (I only found this which appears to be related to this one), The Hindu, Times of India, NDTV, DNA, Hindustan Times, Zee News and Indian Express. Without a single good source and move target as an alternative to deletion, there's not much to suggest keeping (you would've at least expected something close to good coverage). Pinging probably the only interested editor (BLPPRODer) Joe Decker. SwisterTwister talk 00:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:15, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Suraj Pancholi[edit]

The person in the biography is not notable or contributed significantly in any nature. He had only appeared in one film and that is yet to be released. He is not known for any other significant coverage in media. I am nominating this article for deleting according to wiki policy on biographies. Wikipedia:ANYBIO

Rajkancherla (talk) 00:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete - The subject does not meets the notability criteria for WP:NACTOR and it appears to be the case of WP:TOOSOON. Even the leading section of the article is pointing towards inherited notability. — CutestPenguinHangout 13:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)