User talk:KingOpti101

Welcome

Hello, KingOpti101, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 16:30, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

blue background portraits

Hey, I've been reverting your edits that have "updated" the high quality flag portraits of U.S. Representatives to low-quality blue background portraits. Please don't change the portrait shown in the infobox unless a new high-quality one comes out. Thanks. MB298 (talk) 18:49, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:14, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:45, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia bios are not the place to list unsourced achievements, per WP:RESUME. Also, your copy editing isn't acceptable yet. "Prefile", not "Profile", was correct. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:45, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary sources

Hi, you need to use secondary reliable sources for the content that you're adhering. You need to do this to demonstrate WP:DUE and for appropriate context provided by WP:RS. We don't list every single bill that someone voted for/against and then just link to vote tallies. If a vote/position by a politician has been covered by secondary RS (e.g. NY Times, Washington Post), then it can be added. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:47, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pls stop adding empty 'TENURE' sub-sections to all articles

There is absolute no need for empty 'tenure' sub-sections in those articles. Stop it immediately. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 16:01, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Please don't add unsourced political parties to United States Attorneys. Marquardtika (talk) 20:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ron Johnson and Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please discuss on talk page; don't revert without even an edit summary explaining your reasons. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:04, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mary Gay Scanlon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glenn Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind using spell check?

This article: 2020 Republican Party presidential primaries is littered with spelling errors. Please use spell check in the future. David O. Johnson (talk) 01:12, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Two things

1. what was this? and 2. please WRITE EDIT SUMMARIES. Drmies (talk) 17:16, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

House Democratic Caucus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Washington and Georgia

Republican Party (United States) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kevin McCarthy and Gary Palmer

Democratic Party (United States) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael Blake

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You do not seem to understand to which extent your unexplained edits are disruptive, which is very unfortunate. It is entirely possible that you are doing good things, but I really can't tell. Drmies (talk) 23:06, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Toa Nidhiki05, what do you make of all this? You reverted on Republican Party (United States), though you didn't explain why--and I wonder what other recent editors on that article, like Acroterion and SeminarianJohn, think of the edits by this editor. Drmies (talk) 23:08, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The changes added were very poorly formatted, unsourced, and had errors. I figured it was easier to revert outright then to try and fix it - this editor has had multiple people ask them to avoid DAB links and misspelling so it seems to be a fairly common problem here. Toa Nidhiki05 23:11, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that I agree with Drmies that some of the edits could have been quite constructive. I think this is a good reminder to explain the rationale for reverting edits in detail that way other editors can understand why it was needed and, then, what followed to improve the content. Thank you for asking my opinion. Thank you both for your conversation.SeminarianJohn (talk) 04:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Iowa Democratic caucuses, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tim Ryan, John Delaney and Julián Castro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rand Paul

I just happened to notice that when you made an edit to Rand Paul on Aug 1, you added a reference that was never defined so there is a red error message in the "References" section? Do you think you could find the reference that you used and add it to the article to fix the error? Thanks, Edgeweyes (talk) 21:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AIP 2020 nomination

I am reverting the entry in the AIP article indicating that Trump/Pence are the 2020 nominees. If you have a reliable source please add it when making, or suggesting, such an edit. Bcharles (talk) 07:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Green New Deal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Price, James McGovern and Joe Courtney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of members of the Freedom Caucus

Hello, KingOpti101,

Thank you for creating List of members of the Freedom Caucus.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Welcome to Wikipedia.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Markdask}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mark^Dask 08:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Political Parties of Judges

Hello KingOpti -

I've noticed you've added political party to a large number of judges today, mostly or exclusively the Republican Party.

I wanted to follow up with a couple of questions:

The edits I've checked lack citations for the party membership of that judge. Do you have a citation you could add to the pages for this information?
There seems to have been some discussion discussion at WikiProject Courts and Judges with consensus leaning toward not placing political party in the infobox, at least for Supreme Court justices. You may wish to start a discussion on the Wikiproject page to establish consensus to standardize whether or not political party is listed on the pages of judges.

Wikipedia does require citation of a reliable source for the information included on articles. If you don't have a source for the party membership of these judges, we should remove that information until such time that it can be cited.

Let me know if you have any questions! Prodego ^talk 20:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed this as well, and will be reverting these additions pending the addition of sourcing. Marquardtika (talk) 20:30, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maine Senate election

Susan Collins has, despite what the headline of the source in the article says, not announced she is running for reelection; she has said [1] she will decide by the end of this year or early 2020(a lot of it may hinge on the result of an impeachment trial). Please don't change this again until she actually announces. 331dot (talk) 09:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

She is not the nominee until the primary has concluded, it doesn't matter if she is the only candidate. 331dot (talk) 00:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KingOpti101 (talk) 06:02, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand KingOpti101 (talk) 06:01, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to comment on House of Representatives elections

Hello, since you have recently edited 2020 United States House of Representatives elections, 2018 United States House of Representatives elections, or 2016 United States House of Representatives elections, I am inviting you to an ongoing discussion taking place at Talk:2020 United States House of Representatives elections#RFC on inclusion of House elections. Orser67 (talk) 23:56, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop citing 270towin, please

I've undid your edits to 2020 United States Senate elections and started a discussion over at Talk:2020 United States Senate elections. Let's talk more there. 270towin isn't a primary source. It aggregates the other handicappers. That makes its work derivative and citing it like it is a rating implies that they actually look at polls and whatnot and do proper race handicapping. If you disagree say so, but for now let's wait till consensus is built. The Savage Norwegian 20:57, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Illinois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Foster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delegate count

Thank you for your updates to the delegate counts at 2020 Democratic National Convention. Could you also update the "Available delegates" row (the next to the last row of the table)? Every delegate you add to a candidate needs to be subtracted from the available delegates, as this is not done automatically as if it were a spreadsheet. Simply increment the subtotal by whatever you add, then update the expression to use the new subtotal. Thanks! --Spiffy sperry (talk) 05:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I again implore you to make your updates complete. If you don't understand how, let me know and I will provide a fuller explanation. --Spiffy sperry (talk) 16:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2020 United States Senate election in Maine; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 21:15, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from posting Democratic candidate Gary Peters' name and photo in the infobox of the 2020 United States Senate election in Michigan as the filing deadline to run for the August 4 primary is April 21. Steelbeard1 (talk) 23:21, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 331dot (talk) 01:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page participation isn't optional

KingOpt101, this is a collaborative project. You can't keep editing however you want without discussing your edits with those who raise objections. I see you've been left more than a dozen messages in the last year, all of which you've ignored. That can't go on. For starters, please address the issue that 331dot raises in the "Maine Senate Election " thread above, before you start editing articles again. Also take note of the other messages above, and either modify your editing, or discuss those issues too. If you resume editing without addressing 331dot's issue, I'll have to block you from editing until you agree to do so. It's that important. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:21, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Floquenbeam This user has edited. 331dot (talk) 07:25, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Floqenbeam

I'm sorry for my behavior. I will follow your guidlines Floquenbeam

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Senate Republican Conference, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for refusing to discuss issues with other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 16:46, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Once KingOpti101 starts interacting with other editors in a collaborative way, and requests a unblock as described above, any admin can unblock without checking with me first. --Floquenbeam (talk) 16:47, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trying To reedeem myself.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

KingOpti101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here "Floquenbeam I am sorry that I have refused to discuss issues with other editors. I have just recently learned about this talk page and I am sorry for not fully communicating my concerns. I would like to regain your trust"

Accept reason:

User has committed to engaging in discussion when involved in content disputes or when contacted on the talk page. Prodego ^talk 00:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KingOpti101 - certainly. Can you first respond to 331dot in #Maine Senate election above? Prodego ^talk 21:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prodego - I responded and respect your wishes ^{User talk:KingOpti101 21:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC)}[reply]

Alright, I've unblocked you. You don't have to agree with other users - you just have to discuss issues with them, because otherwise we all just end up reverting each other and nothing gets done. Prodego ^talk 00:47, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2020 United States presidential election in Alabama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Alaska (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Arizona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Arkansas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in California (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Colorado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Connecticut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Delaware (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Florida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Hawaii (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Idaho (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Illinois (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Indiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Iowa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Kansas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Kentucky (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Louisiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Maine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Maryland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Massachusetts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Michigan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Minnesota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Mississippi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Missouri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Montana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Nebraska (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Nevada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in New Hampshire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in New Mexico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in North Carolina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in North Dakota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Ohio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Oklahoma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Oregon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Rhode Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in South Carolina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in South Dakota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Tennessee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Texas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Utah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Vermont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Virginia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Washington (state) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in West Virginia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Wisconsin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in Wyoming (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

2020 United States presidential election in the District of Columbia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to RCP

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

If you bother to read the linked citation at [2], the filing deadline to run for the U.S. Senate in Michigan for the August primary is 5 p.m. May 8. Today is May 8 and it is not yet 5 p.m. So your jumping the gun again in the 2020 United States Senate election in Michigan article has been reverted. Steelbeard1 (talk) 14:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thats fine. I will respect that deadline.KingOpti101 (talk) 14:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tuesday Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlie Bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Tuesday Group

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://ballotpedia.org/Tuesday_Group, which is not released under a compatible license. (GNU Free Documentation License alone is not enough.) Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 14:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will follow the rules then

2020 Missouri State Treasurer election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2020 Missouri State Treasurer election, does not have enough content as written to remain published. As well as content, it needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 07:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Missouri Secretary of State election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2020 Missouri Secretary of State election, does not have does not have enough content as written to remain published. As well as content, it needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 07:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Missouri lieutenant gubernatorial election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2020 Missouri lieutenant gubernatorial election, does not have enough content as written to remain published. As well as content, it needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 07:53, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Missouri Attorney General election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2020 Missouri Attorney General election, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 07:55, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Missouri State Treasurer election has been accepted

2020 Missouri State Treasurer election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:52, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Missouri lieutenant gubernatorial election has been accepted

2020 Missouri lieutenant gubernatorial election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:20, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Missouri Secretary of State election has been accepted

2020 Missouri Secretary of State election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:41, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in West Virginia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carol Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of polls from 2020 United States presidential election state contest pages

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at 2020 United States presidential election in Georgia, may be confused with vandalism. I noticed you’ve made this change across many other individual contest pages, as well, all without explanation. — Tartan357 ^(Talk) 23:24, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Yah sorry. just take that down. The ranking dates are just being updated

You just did it again on the Louisiana page. Can you please stop and explain why it should be removed? — Tartan357 ^(Talk) 23:28, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2020 United States presidential election in Maine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Tartan357 ^(Talk) 23:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:56, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking editor's note: I am happy for you to request an unblock, and for any admin to do it, providing you undertake to use edit summaries in future to describe what you are doing when you remove content, and why. They are also needed when you and content, too. Your 95% failure rate to use edit summaries is confusing and is being seen by others as disruptive. None of us are mind readers, so you need to understand that you need to briefly explain why you are making each one of your edits. See WP:EDITSUMMARY. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:02, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My reasons for editiding the pages is so that they are updated. From now on I will fill the edit summaries.

If you will also undertake to include a source of your edits, I will unblock you now.

(On a friendly note, I need somehow to help you appreciate that, whilst you might know the rescheduled dates in 2021 of a postponed 2020 Olympic event, many others will find it a bit incomprehensible, and think it is vandalism. Did you know that we get lots of trouble from silly kids who do subtle vandalism to article that simply involves small changes to a birth date or a record release date, or a music genre? As you are surely getting the data from the tokyo2020 website, it doesn't seem to much to ask you to include that link against each date you add. I do hope you understand why I had to come down hard here, and sincerely hope you will enjoy contributing. I know from personal experience how absolutely horrible it is to find oneself suddenly blocked for no apparent reason when all you're doing is trying to help- it seems so unfair. So just one little note (and it would really help if you ping me) and I will gladly unblocked you.)) All the best, Nick Moyes (talk) 14:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will include a source of my edits and will fill the edit summaries - KingOpti 101

OK - thank you very much for this undertaking. I have now removed the block, and good luck with your future editing. I know you mean well. Nick Moyes (talk) 15:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Missouri Attorney General election has been accepted

2020 Missouri Attorney General election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 (talk) 00:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2019 Mississippi elections

Hello, KingOpti101. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2019 Mississippi elections, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]