User talk:Neptune's Trident

BLP requires you to cite reliable sources for claims about living people[edit]

It does not seem to me that anyone has done a good job of trying to explain this to you, but the policy on biographies of living persons applies to all pages on Wikipedia. That means if you are making a claim about an identifiable living person, even if only on the talk page of an article or another user's talk page, then you should have a reliable source to back up the claim. Preferably, you should either cite the source when making the claim or be referring to sourced information already within an article. Claims made about living people that are not backed by a reliable source may be removed, even if those claims are made on a talk page and admins are allowed to block or sanction you for such claims. Such a policy exists to ensure that Wikipedia does not host or spread information that is defamatory or invasive of a living person's privacy.

At any time should you feel like raising a question relating to a living person, be sure to see if there are reliable sources already covering the issue and cite them when raising the issue. ensure that any claims you make are explicitly backed by the source as well rather than inferences. Be careful about sources too since claims about living people have much stricter sourcing requirements. The rules may seem a little restrictive, but they exist to protect people from defamation or invasion of privacy. Feel free to ask me for further details about the policy if you have trouble understanding, but please avoid saying anything that could be taken as a reference to a specific claim you have made or question you raised regarding a living individual.--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 03:37, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thank you. Neptune's Trident (talk)

AE request closed[edit]

I have closed the arbitration enforcement request against you, the result being that you are admonished for the violation of your topic ban and for repeating a BLP violation. Please be aware that you remain banned from anything that could be reasonably construed to be connected to GamerGate or people associated with it. Further, if somebody suggests that a claim or a statement is in violation of BLP (if you haven't already, you should read WP:BLP), I strongly suggest you discuss the issue without repeating the claim. You should be aware that if you end up at AE again in the near future, the result is likely to be an indefinite block. Hopefully that won't be necessary, though. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thanks. Neptune's Trident (talk)

René Bazinet[edit]

Maybe you should add an (a) before the word "mime," for the first sentence of that second section to make more sense... In any case, I am the author of IMDb's bio of René Bazinet, so please do not use any of its contents - or my stored images in Wikimedia Commons - for any further edits of this Wikipedia article. Thank you. Blythe Spirit (talk) 14:29, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Neptune's Trident (talk)

René Bazinet Photos[edit]

Please refrain using my pictures of René Bazinet, without my consent. Common courtesy and consideration should be exercised in such cases and the ownership of a photographer’s work should be respected. I had previously composed and posted a comprehensive profile/bio, of René, only to experience others making inappropriate edits and finally being notified by an administrator that due to a lack of published references it didn’t meet Wikipedia standards, in any event. I had originally added the images, which are copyrighted, to accompany my composition, but was under the misconception that others could only use them with my permission. The policies regarding permission and image utilization were ambiguously stated and I did not interpret them correctly, as it turned out. Neither was I aware that once they were added to Wikimedia I relinquished the opportunity to remove them, from that site. However, after a talk with my lawyer, who assured me that your organization is not entitled to keep them, rather than file a contentious lawsuit in order to protect my work - by demanding their removal - I decided not to press the issue. I’m sure you can understand why I wouldn’t want my photographic work to be used by unauthorized people to represent their text, especially, after I deleted all of my unappreciated contributions from the René Bazinet page. Thanking you, in advance, for honoring my wishes about not using the René Bazinet images without my express approval, which I'm disinclined to give under the above mentioned circumstances. Blythe Spirit (talk) 11:34, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Precious[edit]

begin articles
Thank you for starting articles on books and films and their people, such as The Covenant with Black America, Dead Pigeon on Beethoven Street, The No Mercy Man, Ruth Barrett and Narciso Ibáñez Serrador, for sticking to content alone, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia: one of the people to whom you added an infobox is #22.222 on my watchlist ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1283 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you (belatedly). Neptune's Trident (talk) 14:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again! Neptune's Trident (talk) 15:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strange things on Duruflé's Requiem and Honegger's Jeanne, - and on his Le Roi David, I added a source today, only to find that the text had been taken word by word from that source ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Petra Laszlo tripping incident[edit]

Hello, Neptune's Trident,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Petra Laszlo tripping incident should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petra Laszlo tripping incident .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Norden1990 (talk) 21:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent edits to Jonathan Haidt[edit]

Thanked you there too. - LeoRomero (talk) 21:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome. Neptune's Trident (talk) 21:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you![edit]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:28, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Helvetica article[edit]

Thanks for spotting that. I've been trying to upgrade the Helvetica article and that undue to me - it's hardly notable that government forms are printed in this font besides noting it. I've decided to delete that section. Blythwood (talk) 06:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Thanks...I am fairly sure it is well deserved, so thank you I'll accept that love and happiness; also, "May it also be with you!" Stumbling Monk (talk) 21:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you![edit]

Fan Wikidumbo (talk) 17:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It looks like you're adding forced image resizing to a few articles. Please don't do this, as it overrides the options that users set in their preferences. For very small screens, a 250 pixel image can be huge, and they may have set their default size to something much smaller. You can read more at WP:IMGSIZE, which discourages this practice. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	hello there friend NicoARicoA (talk) 02:08, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Neptune's Trident (talk) 02:20, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some stroopwafels for you![edit]

Thank you for your efforts in the Petra László tripping incident. It seems like nationalists from the region tried to keep this incident from Wikipedia, but your reasoning prevailed in the end.

Best regards from Amsterdam, Amin (talk) 16:10, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. Neptune's Trident (talk) 16:49, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you![edit]

Thanks for Lucky Boy (novel) interesting article. If you didn't know about WP:FILEUPLOADWIZARD very easy to use. If difficult I would be happy to upload cover for you. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Yes, feel free to upload the cover. Neptune's Trident (talk) 21:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Neptune's Trident. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing[edit]

Hello, Neptune's Trident.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 01:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much. Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays and Season's Greetings to you and yours, cheers. Neptune's Trident (talk) 03:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation Reviewing[edit]

Hello, Neptune's Trident.

AfC submissions
Random submission

2+ months

2,401 pending submissions

Purge to update

I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.
Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 01:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 15:42, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, once again. Merry Christmas, Happy Winter Solstice and Happy New Year to you and yours. Neptune's Trident (talk)

Mentioned[edit]

Your name has been mentioned at User talk:JJMC89#User:Neptune's Trident. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 23:13, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you reply at the edit warring noticeboard and explain why you shouldn't be indefinitely blocked for failure to communicate? Your standard response to any complaint is just to remove the message. We expect that people should be willing to discuss their edits. EdJohnston (talk) 02:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've responded, thank you. Neptune's Trident (talk) 15:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Long term disruption and failure to communicate. See also all the past problems in your block log. Per a complaint at WP:AN3. Any admin may lift this block if they become convinced that you will follow Wikipedia policy in the future, and will wait for consensus in case of dispute. --EdJohnston (talk) 18:44, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:AN3 closure is here. --EdJohnston (talk) 18:49, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Neptune's Trident (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to respectfully request to have the editing block lifted or changed to a temporary block. I got into an edit dispute with another Wikipedia editor. I apologize for any disruption and would like to ask to have the block lifted or changed, I will promise to adhere to the rules of Wikipedia regarding this matter in the future, thank you for your consideration. Neptune's Trident (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were already given a last chance when you escaped an indefinite block for overt vandalism. You can try the standard offer. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:10, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Deletion discussion about Merrill Shindler[edit]

Hello, Neptune's Trident

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Velella and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Merrill Shindler, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merrill Shindler.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Velella}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Another Girl Another Planet (film)[edit]

Hello, Neptune's Trident

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Velella and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Another Girl Another Planet (film), should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another Girl Another Planet (film).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Velella}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:45, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Real Queer America[edit]

Hello, Neptune's Trident,

Thank you for creating Real Queer America.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please include more content about this beyond a single quote from a newspaper book review.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 13:08, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tips. By the way, if you could please add a cover image for the book article as well it would be much appreciated, thanks, FULBERT. Or if you could also add a book cover for this article as well if you get a chance, see link: Sissy: A Coming of Gender Story. Neptune's Trident (talk) 16:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks very much, Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you as well. Neptune's Trident (talk) 19:20, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Breathless Mahoney[edit]

The article Breathless Mahoney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not seeing any source that discusses this character for more then a single sentence. Mentions are in passing and generally WP:PLOT summaries. Seems to fail GNG/NFICTION.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 00:37, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Breathless Mahoney for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Breathless Mahoney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breathless Mahoney until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Proposed deletion of In Depth with Graham Bensinger[edit]

The article In Depth with Graham Bensinger has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Jeff G. ツ 13:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bad Country (novel)[edit]

The article Bad Country (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, especially considering that the author of the subject, C. B. McKenzie, does not have an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:50, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bad Country (novel) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bad Country (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Country (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Steel1943 (talk) 19:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hart family, 2016.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hart family, 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph Spiegel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Spiegel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Spiegel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. noq (talk) 14:00, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Knights of Asheville[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Knights of Asheville requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bakertheacre ^Chat/_{What I Baked} 05:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zombie Massacre Live! for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zombie Massacre Live! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombie Massacre Live! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 18:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Headhunter (comics)[edit]

The article Headhunter (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sal Jenco[edit]

The article Sal Jenco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero reliable sourcing found. Only had one significant television role, everything else was bit parts.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:34, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Texas by the Tail[edit]

Hello, Neptune's Trident. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Texas by the Tail".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Savage Art[edit]

Hello, Neptune's Trident. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Savage Art".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Snctm (club).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Snctm (club).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rub & Tug[edit]

Hello, Neptune's Trident. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rub & Tug, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Goosed[edit]

The article Goosed has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help it pass WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:15, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of My Santa (2013 film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Santa (2013 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Santa (2013 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 11:02, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of In Depth with Graham Bensinger for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article In Depth with Graham Bensinger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Depth with Graham Bensinger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Calton | Talk 02:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Self-published authors has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Self-published authors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:24, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 3:36 (Music to Sleep To) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 3:36 (Music to Sleep To) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3:36 (Music to Sleep To) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 13:28, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Veronica Osorio for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Veronica Osorio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veronica Osorio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:05, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Algorithms of Oppression moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Algorithms of Oppression, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

Editor notes This is article was draftified as a result of discussion on its talk page. The 2 months grace to modify the articles body so it is in line with wikipedia's quality standards has elapsed, but the body of the article still reads like a chapter by chapter synopsis.

Wikipedia is not a synopsis service, the body of this article is primarily a synopsis without much in the way of explaining the encyclopedic importance of the article. Please modify the article to summarize in brief the entire body of the work, its primary arguments and why it is encyclopedic relevant; rather than a chapter by chapter summary before returning it to main space.

Second, ideal citations would include public commentary, and citations across fields or yt prolific authors in the subject matter area rather than mention in passing or as part of standard procedure.

The criteria for inclusion of academic works is lower than with other articles to avoid rapid deletion of more niche content that may have encyclopedic relevance. This standard applies to what kinds of citations are needed to demonstrate the criteria for inclusion; that is it may be supported by being referenced in the discourse of others in the same subject area. Press releases, listing in catalogs as a matter of course, and citations extolling the author's other works are not suitable in supporting the inclusion of the work. Preferable citations are those that show that others in the same area of subject recognize the value of and have made commentary on the arguments in the work. The academic work inclusion criteria exists to ensure niche works may be included if such citations are made by academics in the subject area even if the work is of lesser value to the general public. The criteria is not license to include ad nauseum every academic work ever created. Before returning this article from draft space please try to include more citations of this nature to reinforce not only what the work says but why it is important to include this in an encyclopedia. Ethanpet113 (talk) 11:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trickle Dickle Down[edit]

The article Trickle Dickle Down has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable short film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 14:24, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Women Behind Bars (TV series)[edit]

The article Women Behind Bars (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only source is a single NYT article. No better sourcing found in newspapers.com or ProQuest

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Surviving Nugent[edit]

The article Surviving Nugent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable show, only 1 reliable source found, but nothing else.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:49, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naked SNCTM[edit]

The article Naked SNCTM has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:PUTEFFORT. Barely any sourcing found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Jane Whitney Show[edit]

The article The Jane Whitney Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for notability 2 years. Sources are unreliable or passing mentions

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Walk This Way (TV series)[edit]

The article Walk This Way (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Two of the three sources are broken. Unlikely to be notable as I could find no better sources, and the network doesn't even have an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SeekingArrangement.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SeekingArrangement.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Double R Diner[edit]

The article Double R Diner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Without user-generated sources, there isn't WP:SIGCOV for this topic. WP:BEFORE only revealed brief coverage that does not support a stand-alone Wikipedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jontesta (talk) 00:05, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Double R Diner for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Double R Diner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double R Diner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jontesta (talk) 00:34, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Get Rollin' (film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Get Rollin' (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Rollin' (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jax 0677 (talk) 01:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ángela Vidal[edit]

The article Ángela Vidal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:14, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Knights of Asheville[edit]

The article Knights of Asheville has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:59, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Perry Stone (radio personality) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perry Stone (radio personality) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perry Stone (radio personality) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BD2412 T 06:10, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mitchell Amundsen for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitchell Amundsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitchell Amundsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DemonDays64 (talk•contribs) 06:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sucker Punch (2008 film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sucker Punch (2008 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sucker Punch (2008 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The Film Creator (talk) 19:57, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Razorback image.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Razorback image.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Countess Victoria Bernstorff-Gyldensteen for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Countess Victoria Bernstorff-Gyldensteen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Countess Victoria Bernstorff-Gyldensteen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BlakeIsHereStudios (talk) 03:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maggie's Way[edit]

The article Maggie's Way has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A book that appears to fail the WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. None of the sources (excluding the WordCat database listing) are actually about the book - one is a review of a different book by the same author, and the other is a blurb about the author herself. Searches did not bring up any kind of reviews or coverage on this particular book that I was able to find.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 00:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]