User talk:Pope sindhi

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pope sindhi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. Place any further information here. Pope Sindhi (talk) 11:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We cannot investigate this without your IP address (see whatismyip.com). Please use WP:UTRS if you wish to maintain your privacy. MER-C 12:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2020[edit]

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Sindhi singers appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:11, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Taj Joyo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much informed me about my mistakes. But taj joyo page I read from bbc urdu then I add little information. Sindhi singers of Sindh a lot but only fewer present in the list so I wanted to enhance Help me in this regard plz

I am student Pope Sindhi (talk) 04:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 monsoon rains of Pakistan moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, 2020 monsoon rains of Pakistan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 04:53, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes exactly but I don't know how to add reference I have full reference source as well but can't add Can you help me plz Pope Sindhi (talk) 04:29, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My WhatsApp +923123721338

Sir can talk you Pope Sindhi (talk) 04:37, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Muhammad district marble mine collapse moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, 2020 Muhammad district marble mine collapse, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 09:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okey sir, I am new and student but I created accurate Pope Sindhi (talk) 19:25, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 Muhammad district marble mine collapse (September 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020 Muhammad district marble mine collapse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2020 Muhammad district marble mine collapse, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pope sindhi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Parti Liyani[edit]

A tag has been placed on Parti Liyani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GILO A&E⇑ 00:06, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Pakistan moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Digital Pakistan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 12:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tania Aidrus[edit]

Hello Pope sindhi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tania Aidrus for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 13:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are right but I didn't copy at all context Pope Sindhi (talk) 07:41, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tania Aidrus moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Tania Aidrus, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 01:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir it was second time I created article about Tania Aidrus but published basic reference too unfortunately second time deleted so sad Pope Sindhi (talk) 04:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Islamabad Dry Port moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Islamabad Dry Port, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Roller26 (talk) 10:59, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Qazi Qadan moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Qazi Qadan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 14:51, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Islamabad Dry Port (October 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hatchens were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Islamabad Dry Port and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Islamabad Dry Port, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hatchens (talk) 15:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aileen Vailoces[edit]

A tag has been placed on Aileen Vailoces requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 22:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okey I rewrite it Pope Sindhi (talk) 02:39, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayub Faqeer Abro[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ayub Faqeer Abro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 22:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Sabit Ali Shah moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Syed Sabit Ali Shah, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 08:03, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But it has now I added Pope Sindhi (talk) 10:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to draft[edit]

I moved your new article to Draft:Pakistan banned TikTok, as the article does not have text or sources on the banning. It needs to be further developed prior to being placed in mainspace.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 06:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But I have improved it recheck it sir bundles of thanks 🙏 Pope Sindhi (talk) 09:12, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Parween Musa Memon moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Parween Musa Memon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved it bundles of thanks Pope Sindhi (talk) 12:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Your edit to Pakistan banned TikTok has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:29, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okey Pope Sindhi (talk) 11:37, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Allama Irfan Ali Jagirani[edit]

A tag has been placed on Allama Irfan Ali Jagirani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Northern Escapee (talk) 14:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But I have created this article very carefully and reflect all real facts and figures Pope Sindhi (talk) 05:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parween Musa Memon (October 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Padavalamkuttanpilla was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

lack of substantial coverage

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Parween Musa Memon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Parween Musa Memon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Padavalam🌂 ► 17:24, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But I think it's part of Sindhi literature related so I write it on Wikipedia Pope Sindhi (talk) 05:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Allama Irfan Ali Jagirani[edit]

A tag has been placed on Allama Irfan Ali Jagirani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dtt1^Talk 05:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pir Nooruddin[edit]

A tag has been placed on Pir Nooruddin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.dostpakistan.pk/pir-nooruddin/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wiki Macaroons^Cinnamon? 10:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Pope sindhi! Thank you for your contributions. I am TheSecretImpostor and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. If you wish to contact me on this page, please use {{Ping|TheSecretImpostor}} such that I get notified of your request. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
How to write a great article
The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! TheSecretImpostor (talk) 13:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much sir I am shakeel Ahmed Sindhi from Sindh Pakistan and student of Civil service exam . Yes I need your help Pope Sindhi (talk) 13:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSecretImpostor:

Hello Pope sindhi. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access to the channel.

Pope Sindhi (talk) 13:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TheSecretImpostor I need information how create map on Wikipedia, I want to Create map about Taiwan Pakistan relationship which is not available on Wikimedia as well as Google map Pope Sindhi (talk) 10:07, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSecretImpostor

Dear sir please help me How I can create map of Pakistan Taiwan relationship on Wikipedia which is not available on Wikimedia and Google

My what's app+923126643194 Pope Sindhi (talk) 10:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help?[edit]

I have gotten your msg on you needing help, if you can answer what do you need help with? Signed - TheSecretImpostor (talk) 15:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Qazi Qadan (November 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KartikeyaS343 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Qazi Qadan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Qazi Qadan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KartikeyaS (talk) 09:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not need to any More work on it ... I don't understand Wikipedia and it's reviewers Pope Sindhi (talk) 09:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

People's Primary Healthcare Initiative Sindh moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, People's Primary Healthcare Initiative Sindh, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 16:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okey I had just that sources which I found ajd added I try my best to add more sources as well, publish it others too help in improving Pope Sindhi (talk) 05:10, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: People's Primary Healthcare Initiative Sindh (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from pphisindh.org/home/about-us.php. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:People's Primary Healthcare Initiative Sindh may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 06:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Dayali Gul tagged for deletion[edit]

Hello Pope sindhi, I wanted to let you know that I've tagged Dr. Dayali Gul for deletion because the article is too promotional for an encyclopedia. If you feel that this assessment is incorrect, you can either edit the article to remove the promotional parts or you can click on the "Contest this deletion" button and explain it on the talk page, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Phrases such as "leading" are best avoided as they're too promotional. Additionally, the article on Gul does not clearly explain how the subject is notable enough for an encyclopedia. I wasn't able to verify that the Encyclopedia Sindhiana had written about her. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedia sindhiana is written in Sindhi language, on the other hand she is biggest ever Gynocologist in Larkana Sindh that's why I wrote leading, Gul is a name of male Her husband name is Raj Kumar Gul so she adopted that epitome. Okey if this article has been deleted I try my best to create ataun bundles of thanks Pope Sindhi (talk) 12:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

I see that you've received some deletion notices about some of your recent articles. Writing an article from scratch is extremely hard, it's usually much better to improve already existing articles. The main thing one has to have in mind is that subjects have to have received significant coverage in independent sources and it's best to assemble the sources before one writes an article. Feel free to write on my talk page if you want some help with assessing whether the available sources are sufficiently good to demonstrate WP:GNG. You can also come ask at the WP:Teahouse. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sufi Waryal Faqeer Abro[edit]

A tag has been placed on Sufi Waryal Faqeer Abro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://sindhsalamat.com/threads/18833/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pir Shams Deen moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Pir Shams Deen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khalifo Gul moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Khalifo Gul, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2020 monsoon rains of Pakistan (December 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020 monsoon rains of Pakistan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2020 monsoon rains of Pakistan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:20, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hingol National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lasbela. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Corona Relief Tiger Force, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:57, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Giannina Maradona[edit]

A tag has been placed on Giannina Maradona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 05:54, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But it's popular article, as well as it's netural point of view too okey Pope Sindhi (talk) 05:56, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tania Aidrus (December 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All statements must have citations to a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tania Aidrus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tania Aidrus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 12:00, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital Pakistan (January 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jupitus Smart was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please include more references as its unclear what Digital Pakistan is

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Digital Pakistan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Digital Pakistan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jupitus Smart 02:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Academy of Educational Planning and Management moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Academy of Educational Planning and Management, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Qazi Qadan has been accepted[edit]

Qazi Qadan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~Kvng (talk) 17:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabit Ali Shah has been accepted[edit]

Sabit Ali Shah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:06, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blue Economy In Pakistan[edit]

A tag has been placed on Blue Economy In Pakistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.bolnews.com/business/2021/03/what-is-blue-economy-and-why-is-pakistan-lagging-behind-in-it/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Modussiccandi (talk) 10:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry I didn't copy from that website which is mentioned above I just read this BBC Urdu website and o wrote it in my own words recheck it plz

Thanks Pope Sindhi (talk) 10:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Islamabad Dry Port[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Islamabad Dry Port, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bengali Muslin moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Bengali Muslin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, we do have to be careful that the sources we use in article directly verify the content they're attached to. Three of the sources did not mention the topic of the article, the rest of the article was almost entirely unsourced. Wikipedia tries to just neutrally summarize what reliable sources say, so articles here are written in a style different from argumentative essays, the pages WP:NEUTRAL and Wikipedia:Writing better articles offer some tips on how to sound neutral. – Thjarkur (talk) 10:39, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okey Pope Sindhi (talk) 10:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bengali Muslin (March 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it will almost certainly be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a partial block may be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This page has a breezy informal tone which is not encyclopedic. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and is written in a formal impersonal tone.

If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bengali Muslin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bengali Muslin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pakistan banned TikTok[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pakistan banned TikTok, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Huzail al-Allaf moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Abu Huzail al-Allaf, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:23, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Raees Ghazi Muhammad moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Raees Ghazi Muhammad, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 05:27, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Raees Ghazi Muhammad has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Raees Ghazi Muhammad. Thanks! Hatchens (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhong Mosque, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Shikarpur and Allah Bakhsh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Parween Musa Memon[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Parween Musa Memon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:46, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Umme Rubab Chandio moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Umme Rubab Chandio, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:36, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How I add others soucrces ?whereas I have added news related sources already. Pope Sindhi (talk) 08:49, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umme Rubab Chandio (May 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CommanderWaterford were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umme Rubab Chandio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Umme Rubab Chandio, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:53, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am extremely sorry @commanderWaterford you have done that to rejected my written article, it is mean of discouraging no others I have to say 😥 Pope Sindhi (talk) 09:12, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umme Rubab Chandio (May 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Umme Rubab Chandio and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Umme Rubab Chandio, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So sad ,, I do have words , I have seen many articles which doesn't have even two references but present but article with 6 reference deleted Pope Sindhi (talk) 13:23, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pir Shams Deen[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pir Shams Deen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Umme Rubab Chandio has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Umme Rubab Chandio. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:21, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ysabelle Cuevas[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ysabelle Cuevas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ysabelle Cuevas for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ysabelle Cuevas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ysabelle Cuevas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

—hueman1 (talk • contributions) 04:55, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sayeed Sultana moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sayeed Sultana, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 10:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I has tried my best to get reliable sources Pope Sindhi (talk) 12:32, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sevinch Mo'minova moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Sevinch Mo'minova, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Thjarkur (talk) 15:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes dear Sir Thjarkur I have noticed your comment but if I don't get any reliable sources then i can't write article in Wikipedia. Pope Sindhi (talk) 11:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources[edit]

Hello Pope sindhi, it appears that you are having some problems with Wikipedia's sourcing requirements. Please consider submitting new articles for review with WP:AFC to have someone check over your sources.

Wikipedia articles have to summarize what reliable sources say. Facebook posts are not reliable and those Celebrity Facts sites such as Popnable are not reliable, they have to be completely avoided.

When creating a new article, first find all major newspaper coverage about the subject and all major book coverage. You can go to Google News and search the subject there, click on Tools and then change "Recent" to "Archives" to find newspaper coverage.

When you have verified that the coverage is from a reliable source (if the newspaper has a Wikipedia article it's most often reliable) and is not a "Celebrity Facts" site, then summarize what the source says. Don't add any of your personal knowledge.

An article needs to cite multiple sources showing significant coverage. For that reason it's good to start with summarizing what newspapers say.

In your article on Sevinch Mo'minova, you cited one unreliable Celebrity Facts site and then you cited an unreliable Facebook fan site that did not even include any information relevant to the paragraph that it was attached to.

Feel free to write on my talk page and I'll assist you with finding and summarizing reliable sources.

– Thjarkur (talk) 15:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, but for example if I don't get any reliable sources then I no need to article on Wikipedia inspite of popularity of it Pope Sindhi (talk) 06:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If a singer or actor is notable enough for Wikipedia then reliable sources will exist. If no reliable sources exist, then you are correct that the subject doesn't qualify for a Wikipedia article. Note that in your article Draft:Dana Christina you cited spicyonion.com, which is not a reliable source, and would have to be removed. Dana Christina is very likely notable, if you could find some old newspaper interviews or other newspaper coverage that dedicates more than a paragraph to her, the article would be accepted. – Thjarkur (talk) 08:08, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dana Christina[edit]

The article Dana Christina has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. MB 03:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sayeed Sultana (May 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NSPORT for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it will almost certainly be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a partial block may be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

Multiple sections of this draft are missing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sayeed Sultana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sayeed Sultana, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:04, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Khalifo Gul[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Khalifo Gul, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dana Christina moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Dana Christina, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 00:57, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2020 monsoon rains of Pakistan[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2020 monsoon rains of Pakistan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Padusan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dynamism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's about metaphysical topic dynamism material world I didn't clarify it sorry plz reset it thanks Pope Sindhi (talk) 13:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital Pakistan (May 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Digital Pakistan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Digital Pakistan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Academy of Educational Planning and Management (May 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Academy of Educational Planning and Management and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Academy of Educational Planning and Management, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:17, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Padusan moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Padusan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 02:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pakistan–Taiwan relations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mandarin and Indigenous.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of Style - Nasr ibn Hajjaaj[edit]

Hi Pope sindhi, please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles for how to describe an islamic prophets in a neutral way when creating articles such as the above mentioned. Many thanks for your edits JW 1961^Talk 14:37, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plant for Pakistan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Shell and Solar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, 2021 Ghotki train crash[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2021 Ghotki train crash. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2021 Sindh train collision. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2021 Sindh train collision. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Dora the Axe-plorer (talk) 08:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ICJ (Review & Reconsideration) Ordinance 2020[edit]

Hello Pope sindhi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ICJ (Review & Reconsideration) Ordinance 2020 for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 07:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote it by myself Sir, if feel any copyright material just remove it so that I can rewrite but please don't delete it m Pope Sindhi (talk) 07:58, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from ICJ (Review & Reconsideration) Ordinance 2020, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 08:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to inform me about it Sir, I think you from Indonesia the World largest archipelago of South East Asian. Pope Sindhi (talk) 08:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Jinguashi. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Padusan (June 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robertsky were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Historical Overview is largely unsourced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Padusan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Padusan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 00:04, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ibrahim Monshi[edit]

FYI, I have redirected your recently-created article Ibrahim Monshi to the existing one at Ibrahim Munshi. Best, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:50, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tania Aidrus[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tania Aidrus".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:03, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pir Shams Deen (July 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pir Shams Deen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pir Shams Deen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 19:45, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khalifo Gul (July 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khalifo Gul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Khalifo Gul, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:18, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dada Sindhi moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Dada Sindhi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Please see WP:CIT on what needs to be included in references/footnotes in order to meet WP:VERIFY.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hasho Kewalramani moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Hasho Kewalramani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Please see WP:CIT on what needs to be included in references/footnotes in order to meet WP:VERIFY. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hasho Kewalramani (July 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

not clear how they pass WP:GNG?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hasho Kewalramani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hasho Kewalramani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dada Sindhi (July 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

not clear how they would pass WP:NWRITER

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dada Sindhi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dada Sindhi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:09, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khalifo Gul (July 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khalifo Gul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Khalifo Gul, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Abu Huzail al-Allaf[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Abu Huzail al-Allaf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pakistan-Taiwan relations[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pakistan-Taiwan relations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:08, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ICJ (Review & Reconsideration) Ordinance 2020 moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, ICJ (Review & Reconsideration) Ordinance 2020, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 20:55, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ICJ (Review & Reconsideration) Ordinance 2020 (October 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ICJ (Review & Reconsideration) Ordinance 2020 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ICJ (Review & Reconsideration) Ordinance 2020, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 01:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sevinch Mo'minova[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sevinch Mo'minova, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Digital Pakistan[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Digital Pakistan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Academy of Educational Planning and Management[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Academy of Educational Planning and Management, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dr. Rahmat Ali Wagan[edit]

The article Dr. Rahmat Ali Wagan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Rahmat Ali Wagan[edit]

Hello Pope sindhi,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dr. Rahmat Ali Wagan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961^Talk 14:40, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dr. Rahmat Ali Wagan[edit]

The article Dr. Rahmat Ali Wagan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dr. Rahmat Ali Wagan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dr. Rahmat Ali Wagan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Rahmat Ali Wagan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 16:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Raees Ghazi Muhammad[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Raees Ghazi Muhammad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Umme Rubab Chandio[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Umme Rubab Chandio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

St. Martin de Porres Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, St. Martin de Porres Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs some prose content and citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JW 1961^Talk 19:23, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sevinch Mo'minova[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sevinch Mo'minova".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dana Christina[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dana Christina".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bengali Muslin[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bengali Muslin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Padusan[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Padusan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of All Pakistan Petrol Pumps Dealers Association's Demonstration 2021 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article All Pakistan Petrol Pumps Dealers Association's Demonstration 2021, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Pakistan Petrol Pumps Dealers Association's Demonstration 2021 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am still confused why it's not suitable for Wikipedia, well I try my best to contribute to Wikipedia Pope Sindhi (talk) 03:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Padusan[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Padusan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bundles of thanks to inform me, I try my best next time Pope Sindhi (talk) 01:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hasho Kewalramani[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hasho Kewalramani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dada Sindhi[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dada Sindhi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~==Speedy deletion nomination of 2022 in Pakistan==~~

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, 2022 in Pakistan, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pir Shams Deen[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pir Shams Deen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:16, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hasho Kewalramani[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hasho Kewalramani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dada Sindhi[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dada Sindhi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Khalifo Gul[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Khalifo Gul".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 11:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Abu Huzail al-Allaf[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abu Huzail al-Allaf".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:53, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sayeed Sultana[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sayeed Sultana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:St. Martin de Porres Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:St. Martin de Porres Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ICJ (Review & Reconsideration) Ordinance 2020[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ICJ (Review & Reconsideration) Ordinance 2020".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nazim Jokhio Murder Case[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nazim Jokhio Murder Case, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Umme Rubab Chandio[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Umme Rubab Chandio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:St. Martin de Porres Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China[edit]

Hello, Pope sindhi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "St. Martin de Porres Hospital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Expedition of Tabuk, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mr.weedle (talk) 19:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 16:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have received several pervious notices and warnings for copyright violations. Today I reverted your edit to Thabit ibn Qays, which seems to have been copied from https://masjidisa.com/stories/story-thabit-ibn-qais-loud-voice or elsewhere, although it was not cited as a source. Along with being a copyright violation, this is plagiarism as you did not cite the source. You do not seem to understand that you cannot copy from sources, so I have blocked you. If you want to be unblocked, you need to commit to not copy from sources, commit to citing them, and demonstrate a better understanding of copyright. User:Moneytrees/Copyright blocks contains some advice on appealing this block. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 17:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]