User talk:XxTimberlakexx

Welcome!

Hello, XxTimberlakexx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Hyacinth (talk) 00:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CringeHumorSherrod.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CringeHumorSherrod.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Beethoven Lives Upstairs.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Beethoven Lives Upstairs.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:The Lazarus Plot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Lazarus Plot.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:MirandaCosgrove135.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MirandaCosgrove135.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:NathanKress2315.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NathanKress2315.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MirandaCosgrove135.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:MirandaCosgrove135.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fre h ley 07:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:NathanKress2315.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:NathanKress2315.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fre h ley 07:27, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:JennetteMcCurdy302.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:JennetteMcCurdy302.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fre h ley 07:29, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Hi. I wanted to let you know that your recent edits to Men in Black: Alien Attack have been undone. While I believe they were made in good faith, they added an excessive amount of non-notable detail that really didn't plus the article. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to leave them on the article talk page or on my own talk page. Thanks, and happy editing! --McDoobAU93 (talk) 20:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Playing card redirects

Hi XxTimberlakexx,

We don't really need dozens of redirects to playing cards. There would never be an encyclopedia article about, for example, the Two of hearts playing card and readers would not expect to find one. So Two of Hearts doesn't need a link to playing card. You might want to have a look at WP:DISAMBIG and WP:HAT to see what kind of disambiguation links are appropriate.

All the best, Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 05:38, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why the other redirects exist. The question is, if a user types "two of hearts" into the search box, what are they looking for? The answer is the song. If a user wants to know about playing cards, they'll type "playing cards" (or "deck of cards", or "cards", or whatever). Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 16:30, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you want to, although to be honest I think most of the redirects are harmless, and may even discourage someone from making a facile article about the Four of diamonds, for example. A redirect that points to Playing card is only problematic if it makes it harder for readers to find what they're looking for. For example, a redirect at Two of Hearts to Playing card makes it harder for readers to find the song of the same name, as well as necessitating a hatnote at Playing card that will be irrelevant to >99% of readers of that page. So I guess I was a little unclear before... it's not so much the existence of the redirects per se, as whether they help or hinder our readers.

Of course, you're welcome to nominate the other redirects for deletion if you want to see what other editors think. The best way would be to nominate them all in a single discussion per WP:BUNDLE.

Cheers, Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 04:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just to let you know I removed the AFD tags you put on the ## of hearts articles, as the nominations were incomplete and AfD would be the wrong venue. If you would like to pursue this Redirects for discussion is your best bet. If you have any questions, let me know? regards ascidian | talk-to-me 18:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Beethoven_Lives_Upstairs.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Beethoven_Lives_Upstairs.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:22, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages

I really appreciate your many worthwhile additions to disambiguation pages, but since you are making so many such additions, I do encourage you to familiarize yourself with the Manual of Style for disambiguation pages. For example, regarding this edit diff to Hell (disambiguation), and many similar edits: Please do not add additional blue links to dab page entries. As stated in WP:MOSDAB, and in the note at the top of the edit page of every dab page, each entry on a dab page should have exactly one navigable (blue) link. I'm sure you have run across many pages where this guideline is not adhered to, but we are trying to clean those up and bring something close to a uniform style to disambiguation pages. Thanks for your help, and Happy editing!--ShelfSkewed Talk 13:27, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, you don't have to fix all your past edits. I've probably already fixed a few, anyway, and they'll all get cleaned up in time. When replying to messages in the future, you can simply respond on your own Talk page, since most people keep an eye on Talk pages they have posted to, and it's best to keep conversations all in one place. But if you do reply on the other user's page, please do so on the Talk page, rather than the User page: My User page. My Talk page. Regards --ShelfSkewed Talk 14:17, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gold lego studs listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gold lego studs. Since you had some involvement with the Gold lego studs redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bsay~~USD~~CSU[ π ] 01:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keri Smith

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Keri Smith, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kerismith.com/bio.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:41, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Keri Smith

A tag has been placed on Keri Smith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb1 (talk) 22:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of New pages

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. SteveO (talk) 13:15, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DAB pages

Will you please stop making disambiguation pages where there is no need for them? There IS no V-word, S-word, etc. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 20:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of V word

I have nominated V word, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V word. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies (talk) 21:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Argyle Sweater

A tag has been placed on Argyle Sweater requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I42 (talk) 21:05, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Raining Sunshine

The article Raining Sunshine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, no context

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 01:33, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Lego Batman: The Videogame characters

I have nominated List of Lego Batman: The Videogame characters, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Lego Batman: The Videogame characters. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sorry, I feel really bad about this. Please don't hold a grudge, Lord Spongefrog, (I am the Czar of all Russias!) 10:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you need to make the case at the AfD discussion, WP:Articles for deletion/List of Lego Batman: The Videogame characters, not the article talk page. Please be aware that justifying it by comparing it to a list for a more notable game is not likely to be acceptable as an argument. DGG ( talk ) 15:36, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Let There Be Sound

I have nominated Let There Be Sound, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let There Be Sound. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies (talk) 02:47, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Let there be guitar

RfD nomination of Let There Be Sound

LOL

That's quite an effort you're going to, but is it really necessary? Declan Clam (talk) 21:10, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please stop. There are many more useful things to be doing. DJ Clayworth (talk) 21:14, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. You are, I take it, aware that you can be blocked for disruptive editing? DJ Clayworth (talk) 21:18, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alexf^(talk) 21:29, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ghost Hounds

A tag has been placed on Ghost Hounds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 02:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rebel Intro

The article Rebel Intro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Since none of these songs have an article here, then there's no need to have this disambig page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 02:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rebel Intro

I have nominated Rebel Intro, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Intro. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 16:45, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Rebel Intro. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Victão Lopes ^{I hear you...} 19:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Rebel Intro, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Declan Clam (talk) 21:56, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Hi, just to point out that you don't need to create redirects for different capitalizations of the second word of an article name. For example, entering "David smith" in the search box will automatically go to the article David Smith. Try it! Black Kite 15:45, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please cease creating spurious and misleading redirects. As mentioned above, you DON'T need to recapitalise certain redirects, and you are also creating misleading redirects.

For example, if there is to be a redirect Jokes On You, it should redirect to The Joke's on You, a notable album, or The Joke's on You (film) a notable film, rather than a non-notable song by a minor band.

Please use the search function before doing this. Editors have had to be blocked for creating massive amounts of confusing redirects - please don't let this have to happen here. Redirects should be useful and clear. Black Kite 14:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation

Yes, but they're pointless. Anyone typing "Darth vader" into the searchbox will be sent to Darth Vader even if the redirect doesn't exist. Anyhow, that's a separate issue - I'm more concerned about the redirects such as non-notable song titles or implausible sentences that you're creating - most of the Yahoo! answers ones were pretty pointless and could be confusing to readers who aren't sure why they've arrived at that page. We've recently had another editor doing this - a read of this version of his talk page may hold some good pointers to what are good and not-so-good redirects. Thanks, Black Kite 15:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because some capitalisations, especially with multiple words, do need a redirect. The search engine isn't perfect, sadly! Best thing to do is just try it out before you create a redirect. Black Kite 19:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of No, Luke, I am your father

I have nominated No, Luke, I am your father (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Declan Clam (talk) 01:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC) As with other editors I must ask you to please put more thought into the redirects you create. Redirects should be an aid to use of the encyclopedia, not a way of ensuring that every word or phrase in existence has a page on Wikipedia. Declan Clam (talk) 01:47, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Nerf N-Strike Elite, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:30, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Ice Age: Th4w

I have nominated Ice Age: Th4w, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice Age: Th4w. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mike Allen ^{talk · contribs} 20:05, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. But the thing about it is, no reliable sites are reporting it, and it shouldn't be on Wikipedia until a reliable site does. You're welcome to take part in the discussion here. Thanks. --Mike Allen ^{talk · contribs} 22:14, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't redirect until discussion is over. Thanks. --Mike Allen ^{talk · contribs} 23:11, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Style Lab: Jewelery Design

The article Style Lab: Jewelery Design has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nerf N-Strike Elite

The article Nerf N-Strike Elite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:28, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of characters in the Lego Star Wars games

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of characters in the Lego Star Wars games. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of characters in the Lego Star Wars games. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing???

What are you doing?

Pls stop redirecting titles that have nothing to do with the redirect ....I have put this account up for review by admin ..see here Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism Buzzzsherman (talk) 22:41, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XxTimberlakexx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I need my account back because I want to help Wikipedia some more. Wikipedia is my life. I need this account back!!

Decline reason:

No compelling reason given. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 15:25, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XxTimberlakexx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise I will be nice. All I was doing was editing in good faith.

Decline reason:

No substantial unblock request provided. Furthermore, you have been asked several times to change your behavior and you have not. This makes it hard to assume that you are editing in good faith. TN X Man 16:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XxTimberlakexx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wants account back badly. Just give me another chance! I didnt do anything!

Decline reason:

This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
- If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
Click edit this page on that article and scroll down past the message informing you of your block.
Copy the source of that article and paste it to the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = [[Article title]] =) and save the page before you improve it.
Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. NW (Talk) 16:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XxTimberlakexx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can't do that because I am blocked. Can someone unblock me so I can do this? I promise! I was editing in good faith that whole time and you guys underestimated me.

Decline reason:

You can do all this on your talk page. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

RfD nomination of Shoop da Woop

RfD nomination of On the Line Again

RfD nomination of Pleasure of Love

RfD nomination of Life Is Great

RfD nomination of Atsababy

RfD nomination of Atsababy!

RfD nomination of Atsababy! (Life Is Great)

RfD nomination of Booming and Zooming

RfD nomination of The Shmenge Polka

RfD nomination of The Gorilla Song

RfD nomination of Dee Myth

RfD nomination of The Changing Garden of Mr. Bell

RfD nomination of C-A-N-A-D-A

RfD nomination of Spring Flowers

RfD nomination of Cowlit Night

RfD nomination of Slow Day

RfD nomination of The World We Love

RfD nomination of Shake a Toe

RfD nomination of God damn it

RfD nomination of L'Elephant

RfD nomination of Tom Tom Theme

Articles for deletion nomination of Give Us Clean Hands

I have nominated Give Us Clean Hands, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Give Us Clean Hands. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies (talk) 21:20, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Basement

The article The Basement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No visible connection between redirected and redirect subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Manway (talk) 00:38, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Megapixel Electronic Gallery

Paid editing listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paid editing. Since you had some involvement with the Paid editing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 14:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWorld listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WikiWorld. Since you had some involvement with the WikiWorld redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji 04:51, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hobknocker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hobknocker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jessy ^(SCG01) 23:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2 bucks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2 bucks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ZamorakO o (talk) 02:14, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2 bucks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2 bucks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. EricSerge (talk) 00:18, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Across the River listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Across the River. Since you had some involvement with the Across the River redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). TINY MARK 14:31, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Misfortune Cookie

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Misfortune Cookie, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 21:28, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disrespectoids for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disrespectoids is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disrespectoids until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Alles Klar, Herr Kommisar 02:06, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Too Hard To Handle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Too Hard To Handle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Too Hard To Handle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abecedare (talk) 02:12, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dawn Richardson

The article Dawn Richardson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete per WP:TWODABS, and move Dawn Richardson (drummer) to become the primary article. This dab/navigational page is not needed, since navigation to Dawn Michele's band can be accomplished in a {{for}} hatnote.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 02:28, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Browsing History listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Delete Browsing History. Since you had some involvement with the Delete Browsing History redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 02:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Internet Options listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Internet Options. Since you had some involvement with the Internet Options redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 02:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No Best Answer listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect No Best Answer. Since you had some involvement with the No Best Answer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 17:28, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SpongeBump SquarePants Theme Song listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SpongeBump SquarePants Theme Song. Since you had some involvement with the SpongeBump SquarePants Theme Song redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 16:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Imma Firin Mah Lazor listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Imma Firin Mah Lazor. Since you had some involvement with the Imma Firin Mah Lazor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IMMA FIRIN MAH LAZOR listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect IMMA FIRIN MAH LAZOR. Since you had some involvement with the IMMA FIRIN MAH LAZOR redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Safe Home for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Safe Home is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safe Home until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. L1A1 FAL (talk) 20:45, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Opee sea killer

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Opee sea killer, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pinguinn (🐧) 23:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mispase listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mispase. Since you had some involvement with the Mispase redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Twenty-two-dollar bill listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Twenty-two-dollar bill. Since you had some involvement with the Twenty-two-dollar bill redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spiky Gloomba listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spiky Gloomba. Since you had some involvement with the Spiky Gloomba redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:51, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paragloomba listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paragloomba. Since you had some involvement with the Paragloomba redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:52, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hyper Paragoomba listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hyper Paragoomba. Since you had some involvement with the Hyper Paragoomba redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:57, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hyper Goomba listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hyper Goomba. Since you had some involvement with the Hyper Goomba redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Paratroopa listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark Paratroopa. Since you had some involvement with the Dark Paratroopa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 07:01, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Koopa listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dark Koopa. Since you had some involvement with the Dark Koopa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 07:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amazy Dayzee listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amazy Dayzee. Since you had some involvement with the Amazy Dayzee redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 07:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Overload for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Overload is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Overload until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 22:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hey Men for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hey Men is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hey Men until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 21:54, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Tab listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New Tab. Since you had some involvement with the New Tab redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 22:18, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vote as best answer listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vote as best answer. Since you had some involvement with the Vote as best answer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 10:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Top Contributor listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Top Contributor. Since you had some involvement with the Top Contributor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 10:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Best Answers listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Best Answers. Since you had some involvement with the Best Answers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 10:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Best Answer listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Best Answer. Since you had some involvement with the Best Answer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 10:46, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bl00d listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bl00d. Since you had some involvement with the Bl00d redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 16:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Peeing in pants

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Peeing in pants, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 16:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Lego games listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Lego games. Since you had some involvement with the List of Lego games redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 14:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Complete Saga listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Complete Saga. Since you had some involvement with the Complete Saga redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:05, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Complete Saga listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Complete Saga. Since you had some involvement with the The Complete Saga redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:05, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lego Star Wars 3: The Complete Saga listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lego Star Wars 3: The Complete Saga. Since you had some involvement with the Lego Star Wars 3: The Complete Saga redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:08, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LSW3 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect LSW3. Since you had some involvement with the LSW3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:08, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indiana Jones (Army Disguise) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indiana Jones (Army Disguise). Since you had some involvement with the Indiana Jones (Army Disguise) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indiana Jones (Desert Disguise) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indiana Jones (Desert Disguise). Since you had some involvement with the Indiana Jones (Desert Disguise) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indiana Jones (Desert) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indiana Jones (Desert). Since you had some involvement with the Indiana Jones (Desert) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:11, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indiana Jones (Dinner Suit) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indiana Jones (Dinner Suit). Since you had some involvement with the Indiana Jones (Dinner Suit) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indiana Jones (Kali) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Indiana Jones (Kali). Since you had some involvement with the Indiana Jones (Kali) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

True Adventurer listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect True Adventurer. Since you had some involvement with the True Adventurer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

True Adventurer meter listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect True Adventurer meter. Since you had some involvement with the True Adventurer meter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lego Batman characters listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lego Batman characters. Since you had some involvement with the Lego Batman characters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:16, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lego Batman: The Videogame characters listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lego Batman: The Videogame characters. Since you had some involvement with the Lego Batman: The Videogame characters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:16, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of characters in Lego Batman listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of characters in Lego Batman. Since you had some involvement with the List of characters in Lego Batman redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:16, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of characters in Lego Batman: The Videogame listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of characters in Lego Batman: The Videogame. Since you had some involvement with the List of characters in Lego Batman: The Videogame redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 15:16, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Attract Suit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Attract Suit. Since you had some involvement with the Attract Suit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 19:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Demolition Suit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Demolition Suit. Since you had some involvement with the Demolition Suit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 19:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heat Protection Suit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Heat Protection Suit. Since you had some involvement with the Heat Protection Suit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 19:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Magnet Suit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Magnet Suit. Since you had some involvement with the Magnet Suit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 19:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Penguin Minion listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Penguin Minion. Since you had some involvement with the Penguin Minion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 19:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic Suit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sonic Suit. Since you had some involvement with the Sonic Suit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 19:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Technology Suit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Technology Suit. Since you had some involvement with the Technology Suit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 19:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Water Suit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Water Suit. Since you had some involvement with the Water Suit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 19:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rock Band Lego listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rock Band Lego. Since you had some involvement with the Rock Band Lego redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 19:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MePhone listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MePhone. Since you had some involvement with the MePhone redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MePhone

Hello XxTimberlakexx,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged MePhone for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

^{Atsme📞📧} 02:29, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Www.Poptropica.com listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Www.Poptropica.com. Since you had some involvement with the Www.Poptropica.com redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Bneu2013 (talk) 05:52, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan blue listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orphan blue. Since you had some involvement with the Orphan blue redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Mildew listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Queen Mildew. Since you had some involvement with the Queen Mildew redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:14, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National No SpongeBob Day listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect National No SpongeBob Day. Since you had some involvement with the National No SpongeBob Day redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stingray 5000 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stingray 5000. Since you had some involvement with the Stingray 5000 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shell Shack listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shell Shack. Since you had some involvement with the Shell Shack redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

S. S. Cheapskate listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect S. S. Cheapskate. Since you had some involvement with the S. S. Cheapskate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:35, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about King of the Hill (song)

Hello, XxTimberlakexx,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, King of the Hill (song) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King of the Hill (song).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 11:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Blast the pants cannon" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blast the pants cannon. Since you had some involvement with the Blast the pants cannon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 21:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Blasting the pants cannon" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Blasting the pants cannon. Since you had some involvement with the Blasting the pants cannon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 21:07, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Th4w" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Th4w. Since you had some involvement with the Th4w redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 05:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Kiwi sticker" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kiwi sticker. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 6#Kiwi sticker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:26, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Banana sticker" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Banana sticker. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 25#Banana sticker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Peach sticker" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Peach sticker. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 25#Peach sticker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Avacado sticker" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Avacado sticker. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 25#Avacado sticker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Tomato sticker" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tomato sticker. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 25#Tomato sticker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Pear sticker" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Pear sticker. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 25#Pear sticker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Plum sticker" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Plum sticker. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 25#Plum sticker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Apple sticker" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Apple sticker. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 25#Apple sticker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Patty Henderson" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Patty Henderson. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 27#Patty Henderson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Punderton" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Punderton. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 27#Punderton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 19:47, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Hyper Spiky Goomba" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hyper Spiky Goomba. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 27#Hyper Spiky Goomba until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 23:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Dark Koopatrol" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dark Koopatrol. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 27#Dark Koopatrol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 23:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Shady Koopa" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Shady Koopa. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 27#Shady Koopa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 23:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Shady Paratroopa" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Shady Paratroopa. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 27#Shady Paratroopa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 23:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"KP Koopa" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect KP Koopa. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 27#KP Koopa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 23:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Tinkling" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tinkling. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 3#Tinkling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:50, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beethoven Lives Upstairs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beethoven Lives Upstairs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Adult Books" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Adult Books. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 4#Adult Books until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Qwirkle (talk) 03:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"B.C. Strut" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect B.C. Strut. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 27#B.C. Strut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 2601:584:101:80B0:28DD:64BF:CE2B:83F9 (talk) 22:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Squidward's Clarinet" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Squidward's Clarinet. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 27#Squidward's Clarinet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 00:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Underwater Sun" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Underwater Sun. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 27#Underwater Sun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 00:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"You're Old" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect You're Old. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 27#You're Old until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 00:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Nick's B. Danube" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Nick's B. Danube. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 27#Nick's B. Danube until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 00:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Hey Mean Mr. Bossman" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hey Mean Mr. Bossman. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 27#Hey Mean Mr. Bossman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 00:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Jelly Fish Jam" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Jelly Fish Jam. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 27#Jelly Fish Jam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 00:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Bubble Beat Box" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bubble Beat Box. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 27#Bubble Beat Box until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 00:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"He's Flying" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect He's Flying. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 27#He's Flying until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 00:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"All You Need Is Friends" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect All You Need Is Friends. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 28#All You Need Is Friends until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 01:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Hey All You People" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hey All You People. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 28#Hey All You People until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 01:56, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Striped Sweater" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Striped Sweater. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 6#Striped Sweater until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 23:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"M16 BB gun" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect M16 BB gun and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 16#M16 BB gun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:29, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Blue Friday" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Blue Friday and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 21#Blue Friday until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. cjquines (talk) 02:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Puniper" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Puniper and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 27#Puniper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:03, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Petuni" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Petuni and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 27#Petuni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Puni Elder" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Puni Elder and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 27#Puni Elder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Pungry" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Pungry and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 27#Pungry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:10, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Petuni" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Petuni and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 27#Petuni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Hooked On Love" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Hooked On Love and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 23#Hooked On Love until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 19:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Astro-Knights" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Astro-Knights has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 10 § Astro-Knights until a consensus is reached. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dexters Laboratory Deesaster Strikes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dexters Laboratory Deesaster Strikes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 17:29, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Chuck e cheese's" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Chuck e cheese's has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 11 § Chuck e cheese's until a consensus is reached. GabrielPenn4223 (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"5:-)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 5:-) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 15 § 5:-) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]