Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television/Canadian television task force/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Category: TV shows produced in Vancouver

Cool wikiproject! It's about shows made in Canada as well as broadcast in Canada, right? Anyways, I was thinking it would be cool to have a category or list of shows produced in Vancouver. This may be to broad and need narrowing down, I don't know. - Peregrine Fisher 07:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

I hadn't really though about that. I was thinking shows about/set within Canada, but given the number of TV shows filmed in Canada that aren't set in Canada, I think that would become a part of the project. I think a category would work better than a list, since I think all you want to say is "Produced in Vancouver". I think that a "Produced in Toronto" cat might be warrented as well, as that's the other filming hotspot. JQF • Talk • Contribs 20:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Please help settle a stalemate

Hi. Could someone please help settle a debate on Canadian science fiction. We are talking about what shows should be listed under the title of "Canadian". User:Avt tor feels that anything filmed in Canada counts as Canadian, whereas I feel that something should have some Canadian creative input to get the title. I have tried to propose a middle ground of splitting the list so that we can both get our way, but he will not allow any compromise. --Arctic Gnome 08:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I've ran into him before regarding the same issue. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 14:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
You are mistaking finance for "creative input"; you are not acknowledging the work of Canadian creative talent on shows produced in Canada. If you talk to authors, screenwriters, actors, production staff, and active fans (organizers of conventions and clubs), the definition of "Canadian" is clearly works done by people living in Canada. Avt tor 18:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
There's nothing wrong with reconizing Canadian talent in shows, I infact would encourage it, but their is a need to reconize the diffence between something with Canadian talent, and something about Canada. JQF • Talk • Contribs 04:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Hardly any Canadian science fiction is "about Canada". For that matter, most American science fiction isn't about America either, and, for example, I would have trouble considering a show like "Star Cops" to be American just because a lot of it is set in the US or the "Ronald Reagan Space Station", and I would certainly consider Hercules to be New Zealander rather than, say, Greek. One could parenthetically highlight shows using Canadian settings, but that's a very small group. Avt tor 04:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I suppose that could be said about science fiction and fantasy. The only sci-fi I can think of off hand set in Canada in ReGenesis, and even then it isn't "about Canada". Hmmm, now I want to go petition the CBC to make more sci-fi shows set in Canada. Maybe change the name of the article to "Science fiction produced in Canada" or something? Maybe sublist or cat the ones specifically set withing Canada? Or maybe two Cats, one "Sci-fi produced in Canada" and one "Shows set within Canada"? JQF • Talk • Contribs 05:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Off the top of my head, Alienated, The Collector, Forever Night, and Highlander: The Raven were clearly set in Canada, but you're right that it's a short list. An article about "Shows set in Canada" would be very short and uninteresting.Avt tor 06:41, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I've been considering this in terms of Stargate Atlantis -- which I always thought qualified as "Canadian content", but others think not, see the talk page. The only distinction I can think of that might be definitive, and I haven't gone to a recorded episode of the programme to confirm what it says, is that there's a little paragraph at the end of most television programmes regarding "country of first publication" for copyright purposes. That would categorize a lot of programmes funded by US production companies and shot in Canada as being US in origin. However, it might be a hard-and-fast rule that an editor could point to with assurance. What are people's thoughts? Accounting4Taste 18:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
There are places to look up such information that maybe didn't exist on the interwebs nearly 6 years ago when the previous comment was composed. The "country of first publication" or "this motion picture is protected under the copyright laws of" often includes the USA no matter what the show's nature and origin might be. One of the easiest ways is to watch the end credits for either the Canada Media Fund (April 2010-present) or Canadian Television Fund (1998-March 2010) or Cable Production Fund (1995-1996) or Telefilm Canada's Broadcast Development Production Fund (1996-1998) as each of those required the product to satisfy Canadian Content requirements. I do believe there is something about the Stargate franchise which qualifies it even though Rising Parts 1 And 2 don't make use of any of those funds. That something might be that the creators of Stargate Atlantis are Canadians. That would apply to Bones. So perhaps it is created by Canadians and made in Canada that qualifies it as CanCon. There are very definitive answers to this question for many shows since at least a few cable channels have a clause in their licence which limits scheduling of non-Canadian content to certain times of day. For example, right now Beauty & The Beast is shown Thursdays at 9pm ET on Showcase but Defiance isn't shown until 10pm ET on Mondays because the former is CanCon and the latter isn't and Showcase's licence prohibits non-Canadian programming between 7 and 10pm. B&TB will almost certainly forever remain an American show per the Wiki article because that is just how things get done around here and truth isn't actually valued at Wikipedia as much as things being verifiable is. An example of why use of the copyright notice or/and country of publication is flawed lies in the most popular sci-fi show so far this century to come from Canada -- Continuum's notice on episode 1 does not even mention Canada. "This motion picture is protected under the laws of the United States and other countries." The copyright however tells a different story -- "Copyright 2012 © Timely Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved." Timely Productions Inc. is the i-am-gonna-guess-holding-company for the show and it is located in North Van. I guess this is a longer way of saying the short answer is 'it isn't always very easy to figure out on any given show'. delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ 05:37, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Hockey Night in Canada GA

I've started trying to fix up HNIC, please help at Talk:Hockey_Night_in_Canada#GA. - Peregrine Fisher 19:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Anime conventions

Why are Canadian anime conventions (such as Anime North and Animaritime) being added to this project? They're conventions, not TV shows.--PatrickD 20:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I added them because this project isn't just about TV shows themselves, but also the history and such of TV shows in Canada. Since these articles are about Canadian conventions focusing on anime (which includes TV shows), I figured they fit the bill. JQF • Talk • Contribs 03:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga has a section on conventions. That's a more logical place for these, IMO. Avt tor 04:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
While they should be under that, I don't see any reason why they can't be under both. JQF • Talk • Contribs 05:15, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I personally have no objection to including fandom as a category within this WikiProject; fandom is my thing. However, I would be surprised if the consensus supported such an expansion of the scope of this particular WikiProject. Avt tor 06:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I think it's appropriate. We should tag any Canadien sci-fi conventions that do TV to. - Peregrine Fisher 07:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
After looking, I can't find a list or cat of sci-fi conventions (or any conventions other that the anime) in Canada. As such, I've created the Category:Conventions in Canada Cat. It needs to be populated, and a Sci-fi cat could be created to. JQF • Talk • Contribs 18:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't see why it would matter to make anime cons apart of this project scope. Project scopes are about distributing, selecting, and focusing on work loads, and are different from categorization. If it's not directly related and has another project covering it.. then it's just counter productive to have two projects covering the same article. -- Ned Scott 03:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Category naming

I would like to point out that there is a policy towards not using abbreviations in the names of categories. This project seems to have created several categories that contain "TV shows", i would suggest changing that to "television shows" or "television programs" or something the likes. TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 11:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject British TV shows uses the same naming convention, so if it's going to be changed, they should probably be informed as well. JQF • Talk • Contribs 12:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Collaboration of the week

I'm thinking with the distinct lack of articles above the "B" class, I think a "Collaboration of the week" program might be in order. Comments? JQF • Talk • Contribs 17:37, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Scopes of WikiProjects

I thought I should give notice here, since I've given this WikiProject as an example of scoping I feel has gone off track. See discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject reform#The scope. -- Ned Scott 00:45, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Reminder

Just a reminder that television shows airing on the CBC are to link to CBC Television, not to Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Bearcat 08:15, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Episode coverage

The WikiProject Television episode coverage taskforce have recently been working on a review process for episode articles. There are a rash of articles about individual episodes which fail notability, and are unlikely to ever reach such requirements. Many contributors are unaware of the specific guidelines to assess notability in episode pages: Wikipedia:Television episodes. We have expanded these guidelines to make them more helpful and explanatory, and we invite you to read the guidelines, and make any comments on its talk page. After much discussion, we have created a proposed review process for dealing with problem articles. See: Wikipedia:Television article review process. We invite discussion of this process on its talk page. General comments about this whole process are welcome at the episode coverage taskforce talkpage. Thanks! Gwinva 10:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Categorization

Just to keep everybody updated, I've started to create dedicated "(Specific year) in Canadian television" categories. I didn't originate the idea; I started it after noticing that at least one such category had been created for a specific year in Australian television. I think it's a valuable way to keep appropriate articles together, however, so I thought I'd explain how I envision them working.

The main category would contain:

Each year's main category is titled "(Year) in Canadian television", and categorized as follows:

[[Category:(Year) in Canada|Television]]
[[Category:(Year) in television|Canada]]
[[Category:Years in Canadian television]]

The program subcategory is titled "(Year) Canadian television program debuts", and categorized as follows:

[[Category:(Year) in Canadian television]]
[[Category:(Year) television program debuts|Canada]]

I've been doing this as I go along, rather than in any sort of methodical way, but at present these are the categories that I've created: 1952, 1958, 1967, 1970, 1974, 1975, 1979, 1985, 1987 and everything after 1992, including 2008.

However, except for 2006 and 2008, I haven't created head articles for any given year yet (one already existed for 2007, grazie Davodd), nor have I necessarily recategorized everything that belongs in any given year. (And yes, there was already enough information on the record to make a viable start on 2008's head article.)

So if anybody wants to help get this organized, here's what needs to be done:

  • categories for any year that doesn't have them yet
  • head articles for any year that doesn't have one yet
  • filing the appropriate articles (in particular, one or more people should methodically go through all the Canadian television show categories to make sure that all television shows are in the appropriate start-year and/or end-year categories, because many of them haven't been added to either one).

Sorry to be such a gassy windbag! Bearcat 07:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Requesting assistance...

We're in a bit of a stalemate over at Talk:Stargate SG-1#Vancouver edit war. Could we have your assistance in deciding how to cite the show's location? Should it be Vancouver, B.C., Vancouver, British Columbia, or Vancouver, Canada? We appreciate any help you can give. =David(talk)(contribs) 02:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:PROD nominations

TV corporation assistance

I started a new article about Blair Murdoch Television Inc, but I required more help to make that article more broad. I'm not sure how many TV shows that were produced by Blair Murdoch. If anyone could pitch in and hopefully create a list of TV shows, that would make the article even better. Johnsprogram 21:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Talk page template merge

I've modified the {{WikiProject Canada}} template so that you can now add a show to both WP:CANADA and this project in one template by using the parameter "tvshow=yes". It will still add the article to the assessment table for this project, though it would use the same rating that it uses for WP:CANADA. Check out Talk:The Red Green Show to see what this will look like. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 21:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Centralized TV Episode Discussion

Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [1]. Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. --Maniwar (talk) 20:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

WGA Strike

Do shows under this project also include the Canadian shows that use American writers? 70.55.85.35 (talk) 04:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Include radio shows

Would anyone here support the project widening its scope a bit to include articles about radio shows? I don't think that there would be enough support to make a full project for radio shows, but most issues that those articles would face would be similar to the ones faced by articles about TV shows, so I think we can handle both here. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 16:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

cat suggestions

Category:Television series set in British Columbia seems to have potential; I can only think of:

Category:Television series made in British Columbia, of which the previous proposed cat would be a subcat, I think would have even more listings: here's the ones I can think of:

I see there's a Category:Vancouver television series but I'm uncomfortable with its title; it doesn't take in Victoria-made series (ReBoot and others); the main reason it's "mostly Vancouver" for TV series-made-in-BC is because there were/are no other "film centres" except Victoria; either Kelowna or Kamloops is onw now, thoug, so "made in BC" is still going to be relevant, if and when TV series are made in the Interior; I still think a subcat for "set in Vancouver" is a valid idea, though....and I see from the Vancouver-series cat how many I've missed.....Skookum1 (talk) 04:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

  • The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
  • The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
  • A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 22:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Canadian TV shows

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:34, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

CWD and CWH

Canada's Worst Driver and Canada's Worst Handyman only cover season 1. I suggest that these be replaced by series articles, and the season articles be moved somewhere...

alternately, series articles should be created... but I think most people are looking for series articles at the main name.

70.55.203.112 (talk) 07:58, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 08:55, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Duplicate quality and importance categories for WP:CANTV

Just wanted to let you know that there are dupe categories for quality and importance in Category:WikiProject Canadian TV shows articles. It looks like Category:Canadian TV shows-related articles by importance and Category:Canadian TV shows-related articles by quality never were populated and I can't tell if there is a corresponding template for those categories. The populated categories run off of the WPCANADA template and not the WPTV one, I have also left a message at WT:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board. Thanks. --Funandtrvl (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Toronto Jones, P.I.

Can someone familiar with Canadian TV check out the article Toronto Jones, P.I. to see if it's for real. I can't find any third party references that support it and I don't know what Channel 15 is. If we can't verify its existence, we should {{prod}} or WP:Afd it. Thanks, Pdcook (talk) 18:48, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Degrassi: The Next Generation

I have nominated Degrassi: The Next Generation for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 117Avenue (talk) 03:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Updates to TV#MOS

I'm not sure how many people monitor WP:MOSTV or even WP:TV (the basic WikiProject for all of us), but we've been trying to get some feedback on additions to the TV Manual of Style. It largely has to do with the inclusion of "Overview" tables at the start of the page, the order in which season lists are presented (currently, there is no concrete order), and what is considered too much info for DVDs (i.e. should we be placing every detail about the box set in the article, from each interview to the aspect ratio, or should be keep it more generalized). Please see discussion at WT:MOSTV#Updates to the MOS. Thank you.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 22:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Breaking Point (TV)

I'm trying to build an article about the Discovery Channel Canada TV show "Breaking Point". Help with it would be nice.

Thanks.

76.66.197.151 (talk) 05:31, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

 Done Your page has been moved to main space thank you for making it ::....Breaking Point (2010 TV series) ....Moxy (talk) 05:50, 9 September 2010 (UTC) !!!!

Canadian TV shows articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Canadian TV shows articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 22:09, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Seasons episode list

Mhiji (talk · contribs) has moved a large number of season episode lists. Since there has been no consensus building discussions about the naming of these episode lists, I have started a discussion at WT:NC-TV. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 03:52, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Task force of WikiProject Television?

Since WikiProject Canadian TV shows has been inactive, it might be likely to be converted into a task force of WikiProject Television. Any questions or any comments, please feel free to do so. Regards, JJ98 (Talk) 08:21, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Why? WikiProjects have ebbs and flows of activity - just because one becomes inactive for awhile doesn't mean that it won't become active again. I actually liked the idea raised at WP:CANTALK to expand the scope to Canadian television, or even Canadian broadcasting, so that it covers more topics. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:47, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
Well, I agree, I don't want to convert into a task force of WP:TV. I may possibly rename to WikiProject Canadian television, just like WikiProject American television and WikiProject Australian television. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 22:39, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Yes, this should be renamed to "Canadian television". And since it functions as a subproject of WPCANADA (see the banner), I don't see why it would taskforce to WPTV, instead of WPCANADA. 70.24.249.190 (talk) 01:26, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Naming convention

A question, if anyone is still around here: should the subcategories of Category:Canadian television series by network be named using "programs", "programmes", or "shows"? - The Bushranger One ping only 21:43, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Motive

Hi

I have just done a little work on Motive [2], if someone could check it is all ok it would be appreciated. Thanks. Chaosdruid (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Series overview tables

Please come to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television#Series overview tables and the like to discuss the implementation of these tables in television articles, from main articles to List of Episode pages.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:24, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Leaflet for Wikiproject Canadian TV Shows at Wikimania 2014

Hi all,

My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.

One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.

This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:

• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film

• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.

• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.

• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____

• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost

The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014

For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:

Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 10:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride!

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!

  • What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
  • When? June 2015
  • How can you help?
    1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
    2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
    3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.


Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Another Believer (talk • contribs) 03:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

MasterChef Canada - Michael Bonacini

Hello. Full disclosure: I work for Oliver & Bonacini Restaurants in their marketing department. We would like to request an article for creation about MasterChef Canada judge Michael Bonacini. Currently, Michael Bonacini is the only MasterChef Canada judge without his own Wikipedia page. We would be happy to provide a wide variety of sources (newspaper articles, magazine features, etc.) to the writer. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebeccaspence (talk • contribs) 15:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Quiet in here

Echo echo echo ... :-) Seriously, though, is there interest here in updating the project? The project title is Canadian television, but the banner has TV shows as its text. I asked over at the talk page for the wp: canada project banner to update to this project's title. I see the categories that the banner uses also have show in the title. Anyway, I'd like to do some update on the tv content. I would like to update the Television in Canada article. Anyone out there??? ... Alaney2k (talk) 17:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

@Alaney2k: Yes it is quiet here, not unlike wp:WikiProject Ottawa and wp:WikiProject Vancouver that only came to life after I recently asked for help there in regards to one of their articles which turned to be controversial (don't ask me why). BTW I was not even aware of the existence of this wikiproj until just now (or I knew and forgot long ago). Ottawahitech (talk) 12:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)please ping me

Requested page move

Please see the discussion on Talk:The Biography Channel (Canada) for a requested page move. musimax. (talk) 15:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Request for input on merger

I invite you to help build consensus on the proposed merger of M3 (Canadian TV channel) into the Gusto (TV channel) article. Please see Talk:Gusto (TV channel).musimax. (talk) 19:23, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television/Canadian_television_task_force/Archive_1&oldid=1137363076"