Jump to content

Subramanian Swamy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Fix link in order to prevent link rot, per URLREQ (via WP:JWB)
Early politics: Fixed typo
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
(44 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
| image = Dr Subramanian Swamy photo.jpeg
| image = Dr Subramanian Swamy photo.jpeg
| imagesize = 250px
| imagesize = 250px
| caption = Swamy in 2019
| constituency = [[List of nominated members of Rajya Sabha|Nominated]]
| constituency = [[List of nominated members of Rajya Sabha|Nominated]]
| constituency2 = [[Uttar Pradesh]]
| constituency2 = [[Uttar Pradesh]]
| party = [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] {{small|(2013–present)}}
| party = [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] {{small|(2013–present)}}
| otherparty = [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]] {{small|(1974–1977)}}<br />[[Janata Party]] {{small|(1977–2013)}}
| otherparty = [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]] {{small|(1974–1977)}}<br />[[Janata Party]] {{small|(1977–2003 ; 2003-2013)}}<br />[[All India Progressive Janata Dal]] {{small|(2003)}}
| constituency1 = [[Uttar Pradesh]]
| constituency1 = [[Uttar Pradesh]]
| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1939|09|15|df=y}}
| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1939|09|15|df=y}}
Line 39: Line 40:
| term_start4 = 10 November 1990
| term_start4 = 10 November 1990
| term_end4 = 21 June 1991
| term_end4 = 21 June 1991
| predecessor4 =
| predecessor4 = [[Dinesh Goswami]]
| successor4 =
| successor4 = [[Kotla Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy]]
| office5 = [[Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha]]
| office5 = [[Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha]]
| term_start5 = 1998
| term_start5 = 1998
Line 58: Line 59:
}}
}}
'''Subramanian Swamy''' (born 15 September 1939) is an Indian [[politician]], [[economist]] and [[statistician]]. Before joining politics, he was a professor of Mathematical Economics at the [[Indian Institute of Technology Delhi|Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi]].<ref name="Swamy recovery IITD" /> He is known for his [[Hindu nationalism|Hindu nationalist]] views.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|last=Anand|first=Geeta|date=2016-07-01|title=Taking Down Politicians for Decades, and Rising in India's Government|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/02/world/asia/india-subramanian-swamy.html|url-access=subscription|access-date=2020-04-02|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> Swamy was a member of the [[Planning Commission (India)|Planning Commission of India]] and was a [[Union Council of Ministers|Cabinet Minister]] in the [[Chandra Shekhar]] government. Between 1994 and 1996, Swamy was Chairman of the Commission on Labour Standards and International Trade under [[List of Prime Ministers of India|former Prime Minister]] [[P. V. Narasimha Rao]]. Swamy was a long-time member of the [[Janata Party]], serving as its president until 2013 when he joined the [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] (BJP).<ref name=":4">{{Cite book|last=Hall|first=Ian|title=Modi and the reinvention of Indian foreign policy|date=25 September 2019|isbn=978-1-5292-0462-9|pages=108|oclc=1090162885}}</ref> He has written on foreign affairs of [[India]] dealing largely with [[China]], [[Pakistan]] and [[Israel]]. He was [[List of nominated members of Rajya Sabha|nominated]] to [[Rajya Sabha]] on 26 April 2016.
'''Subramanian Swamy''' (born 15 September 1939) is an Indian [[politician]], [[economist]] and [[conspiracy theorist]].<ref name="Mohan 2017 z243">{{cite web | last=Mohan | first=R | title=Rajini has right to take his own decision on politics | website=The Asian Age | date=2017-07-14 | url=https://www.asianage.com/india/politics/140717/rajini-has-right-to-take-his-own-decision-on-politics.html}}</ref><ref name="Open The Magazine 2014 q325">{{cite web | title=Disgruntled and Dangerous | website=Open The Magazine | date=2014-07-31 | url=https://openthemagazine.com/features/india/disgruntled-and-dangerous/}}</ref> Before joining politics, he was a professor of Mathematical Economics at the [[Indian Institute of Technology Delhi|Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi]].<ref name="Swamy recovery IITD" /> He is known for his [[Hindu nationalism|Hindu nationalist]] views.<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|last=Anand|first=Geeta|date=2016-07-01|title=Taking Down Politicians for Decades, and Rising in India's Government|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/02/world/asia/india-subramanian-swamy.html|url-access=subscription|access-date=2020-04-02|issn=0362-4331|archive-date=6 May 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200506035442/https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/02/world/asia/india-subramanian-swamy.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Swamy was a member of the [[Planning Commission (India)|Planning Commission of India]] and was a [[Union Council of Ministers|Cabinet Minister]] in the [[Chandra Shekhar]] government. Between 1994 and 1996, Swamy was Chairman of the Commission on Labour Standards and International Trade under [[List of Prime Ministers of India|former Prime Minister]] [[P. V. Narasimha Rao]]. Swamy was a long-time member of the [[Janata Party]], serving as its president until 2013 when he joined the [[Bharatiya Janata Party]] (BJP).<ref name=":4">{{Cite book|last=Hall|first=Ian|title=Modi and the reinvention of Indian foreign policy|date=25 September 2019|isbn=978-1-5292-0462-9|pages=108|publisher=Policy Press |oclc=1090162885}}</ref> He has written on foreign affairs of [[India]] dealing largely with [[China]], [[Pakistan]] and [[Israel]]. He was [[List of nominated members of Rajya Sabha|nominated]] to [[Rajya Sabha]] on 26 April 2016 for a six-year term, ending on 24 April 2022.


==Family and education==
==Family and education==
Subramanian Swamy was born on 15 September 1939, in [[Mylapore]], [[Chennai]], [[Tamil Nadu]], India, to a family which hailed originally from [[Madurai]] in [[Tamil Nadu]].<ref>{{cite web|date=19 July 2011|editor-last=Rao|editor-first=Parsa Venkateshwar Jr.|title=The paradox called Subramanian Swamy|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-the-paradox-called-subramanian-swamy-1567157|work=DNA}}</ref><ref name=":3">[http://www.ibtl.in/news/exclusive/1221/subramanian/ Subramanian Swamy : Lets salute the real fighter 'SINGHAM]</ref> He identifies as a [[Brahmin]].<ref name=":8">{{Cite web|date=2019-03-25|title=I am Brahmin, I can't be 'chowkidar': Subramanian Swamy|url=https://www.deccanherald.com/national/national-politics/i-am-brahmin-i-cant-be-chowkidar-subramanian-swamy-724996.html|access-date=2020-08-31|website=Deccan Herald|language=en}}</ref> His father, Sitaraman Subramanian, was a bureaucrat and his mother, Padmavathi, was a homemaker. He has one younger brother, Ram Subramanian, as well as two younger sisters.<ref name=":9">{{cite web |url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/subramanian-swamy-uncovered-doting-wife-leftist-brother-and-more-212638.html |title=Subramanian Swamy uncovered: Doting wife, leftist brother and more |work=Firstpost|date=14 February 2012 }}</ref>
Subramanian Swamy was born on 15 September 1939, in [[Mylapore]], [[Chennai]], [[Tamil Nadu]], India, to a family which hailed originally from [[Madurai]] in [[Tamil Nadu]] in a [[Tamil Brahmin]] family.<ref name=":8">{{Cite web |date=2019-03-25 |title=I am Brahmin, I can't be 'chowkidar': Subramanian Swamy |url=https://www.deccanherald.com/national/national-politics/i-am-brahmin-i-cant-be-chowkidar-subramanian-swamy-724996.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201107230714/https://www.deccanherald.com/national/national-politics/i-am-brahmin-i-cant-be-chowkidar-subramanian-swamy-724996.html |archive-date=7 November 2020 |access-date=2020-08-31 |website=Deccan Herald |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=19 July 2011|editor-last=Rao|editor-first=Parsa Venkateshwar Jr.|title=The paradox called Subramanian Swamy|url=http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-the-paradox-called-subramanian-swamy-1567157|work=DNA|access-date=2 March 2014|archive-date=6 January 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140106180030/http://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-the-paradox-called-subramanian-swamy-1567157|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite web |url=http://www.ibtl.in/news/exclusive/1221/subramanian/ |title=Subramanian Swamy : Lets salute the real fighter 'SINGHAM |access-date=15 January 2018 |archive-date=15 January 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180115184755/http://www.ibtl.in/news/exclusive/1221/subramanian/ |url-status=live }}</ref> His father, Sitaraman Subramanian, was a bureaucrat and his mother, Padmavathi, was a homemaker. He has one younger brother, Ram Subramanian, as well as two younger sisters.<ref name=":9">{{cite web |url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/subramanian-swamy-uncovered-doting-wife-leftist-brother-and-more-212638.html |title=Subramanian Swamy uncovered: Doting wife, leftist brother and more |work=Firstpost |date=14 February 2012 |access-date=17 December 2013 |archive-date=19 February 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140219075309/http://www.firstpost.com/politics/subramanian-swamy-uncovered-doting-wife-leftist-brother-and-more-212638.html |url-status=live }}</ref>


Sitaraman Subramanian was an [[Civil Services of India|officer]] in the [[Indian Statistical Service]] who served as the director of the [[Central Statistical Organisation|Central Statistical Institute]] in [[Delhi]], and was a statistical adviser to the [[Government of India]].<ref name="Subramanian Swamy - Tehelka"/> The family, which hailed from [[Madurai]] in [[Tamil Nadu]], moved to [[New Delhi]] when Swamy was only six months old. Due to his father's job and the family's [[Tamil language|Tamil]] roots, major national leaders like [[K. Kamaraj]], [[C. Rajagopalachari]] and [[S. Satyamurti]] often visited Sitaraman.<ref name="Swamy - Solution or Riddle">{{cite web|last=Arora|first=Sunit|date=1 January 1970|title=The Jury Is Out, Subramanian Swamy: is the man a solution o\r a riddle?|url=http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/the-jury-is-out/279890|access-date=3 January 2012|work=[[Outlook (Indian magazine)|Outlook]]}}</ref><ref name="Swamy inscrutable">{{cite web|last=Subramanian|first=Samanth|date=1 May 2012|title=The Outlier: The inscrutable politics of Subramanian Swamy|url=http://caravanmagazine.in/Story.aspx?Storyid=1389&StoryStyle=FullStory|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120504172103/http://caravanmagazine.in/Story.aspx?Storyid=1389&StoryStyle=FullStory|archive-date=4 May 2012|access-date=5 May 2012|work=[[The Caravan]]}}</ref><ref name=":10">{{Cite web|last=Nadar|first=A. Ganesh|date=2 January 2012|title=Why should I dislike Chidambaram?: Swamy|url=https://www.rediff.com/news/report/why-should-i-dislike-chidambaram-subramanian-swamy/20120102.htm|access-date=2022-02-08|website=Rediff|language=en}}</ref>
Sitaraman Subramanian was an [[Civil Services of India|officer]] in the [[Indian Statistical Service]] who served as the director of the [[Central Statistical Organisation|Central Statistical Institute]] in [[Delhi]], and was a statistical adviser to the [[Government of India]].<ref name="Subramanian Swamy - Tehelka"/> The family, which hailed from [[Madurai]] in [[Tamil Nadu]], moved to [[New Delhi]] when Swamy was only six months old. Due to his father's job and the family's [[Tamil language|Tamil]] roots, major national leaders like [[K. Kamaraj]], [[C. Rajagopalachari]] and [[S. Satyamurti]] often visited Sitaraman.<ref name="Swamy - Solution or Riddle">{{cite web|last=Arora|first=Sunit|date=1 January 1970|title=The Jury Is Out, Subramanian Swamy: is the man a solution o\r a riddle?|url=http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/the-jury-is-out/279890|access-date=3 January 2012|work=[[Outlook (Indian magazine)|Outlook]]|archive-date=13 March 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160313081755/http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/the-jury-is-out/279890|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Swamy inscrutable">{{cite web|last=Subramanian|first=Samanth|date=1 May 2012|title=The Outlier: The inscrutable politics of Subramanian Swamy|url=http://caravanmagazine.in/Story.aspx?Storyid=1389&StoryStyle=FullStory|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120504172103/http://caravanmagazine.in/Story.aspx?Storyid=1389&StoryStyle=FullStory|archive-date=4 May 2012|access-date=5 May 2012|work=[[The Caravan]]}}</ref><ref name=":10">{{Cite web|last=Nadar|first=A. Ganesh|date=2 January 2012|title=Why should I dislike Chidambaram?: Swamy|url=https://www.rediff.com/news/report/why-should-i-dislike-chidambaram-subramanian-swamy/20120102.htm|access-date=2022-02-08|website=Rediff|language=en|archive-date=8 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220208074302/https://www.rediff.com/news/report/why-should-i-dislike-chidambaram-subramanian-swamy/20120102.htm|url-status=live}}</ref>


=== Education ===
=== Education ===
He attended [[Hindu College, University of Delhi]], from where he earned his bachelor's degree in Mathematics. He then took his master's degree in Statistics from the [[Indian Statistical Institute]], [[Kolkata]]. He was later recommended by [[Hendrik S. Houthakker]]<ref name="Swamy inscrutable"/> and went to study at [[Harvard University]] on a full [[Rockefeller Foundation|Rockefeller]] scholarship,<ref name="Swamy inscrutable"/> where he received his PhD in Economics in 1965, with his thesis titled ''Economic Growth and Income Distribution in a Developing Nation''.<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/id.php?id=208481 |title = Subramanian Swamy - the Mathematics Genealogy Project}}</ref> His thesis adviser was [[Nobel laureate]] [[Simon Kuznets]].<ref name="Swamy inscrutable"/><ref name="Guru PhD: Swamy">{{cite web|last=Swamy|first=Subramanian|date=17 December 2009|title=An Indian tribute: Paul Samuelson, Guru|url=http://business.rediff.com/special/2009/dec/17/subramanian-swamy-pays-tribute-to-paul-samuelson.htm|access-date=29 December 2011}}</ref> While he was a doctoral student at Harvard, he attended [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] as a cross-registered student<ref name="Swamy Samuelson">{{cite news|last1=Swamy|first1=Subramanian|date=22 December 2009|title=Subramanian Swamy: Samuelson - A genius who was my guru|newspaper=Business Standard India|publisher=|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/subramanian-swamy-samuelson-a-genius-who-was-my-guru-109122200056_1.html}}</ref> and later worked at the [[United Nations Secretariat]] in [[New York City]] as an Assistant Economics Affairs Officer in 1963. He subsequently worked as a resident tutor at [[Lowell House]] at Harvard University.<ref name="Harvard economist enemity">{{cite web|last=Dingee|first=William R.|date=2011|title=Harvard Economist Accused of 'Spreading Enmity Between Communities'|url=https://www.thecrimson.com/flyby/article/2011/10/5/indian-india-swamy-current/|access-date=14 September 2019|publisher=[[Harvard Crimson]], Flyby The blog of The Harvard Crimson}}</ref>
He attended [[Hindu College, University of Delhi]], from where he earned his bachelor's degree in Mathematics. He then took his master's degree in Statistics from the [[Indian Statistical Institute]], [[Kolkata]]. He was later recommended by [[Hendrik S. Houthakker]]<ref name="Swamy inscrutable"/> and went to study at [[Harvard University]] on a full [[Rockefeller Foundation|Rockefeller]] scholarship,<ref name="Swamy inscrutable"/> where he received his PhD in Economics in 1965, with his thesis titled ''Economic Growth and Income Distribution in a Developing Nation''.<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/id.php?id=208481 | title=Subramanian Swamy - the Mathematics Genealogy Project | access-date=26 October 2019 | archive-date=6 May 2020 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200506035831/https://www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/id.php?id=208481 | url-status=live }}</ref> His thesis adviser was [[Nobel laureate]] [[Simon Kuznets]].<ref name="Swamy inscrutable"/><ref name="Guru PhD: Swamy">{{cite web|last=Swamy|first=Subramanian|date=17 December 2009|title=An Indian tribute: Paul Samuelson, Guru|url=http://business.rediff.com/special/2009/dec/17/subramanian-swamy-pays-tribute-to-paul-samuelson.htm|access-date=29 December 2011|archive-date=25 April 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120425231530/http://business.rediff.com/special/2009/dec/17/subramanian-swamy-pays-tribute-to-paul-samuelson.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> While he was a doctoral student at Harvard, he attended [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] as a cross-registered student<ref name="Swamy Samuelson">{{cite news|last1=Swamy|first1=Subramanian|date=22 December 2009|title=Subramanian Swamy: Samuelson - A genius who was my guru|newspaper=Business Standard India|publisher=|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/subramanian-swamy-samuelson-a-genius-who-was-my-guru-109122200056_1.html|access-date=13 September 2019|archive-date=6 May 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200506041218/https://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/subramanian-swamy-samuelson-a-genius-who-was-my-guru-109122200056_1.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and later worked at the [[United Nations Secretariat]] in [[New York City]] as an Assistant Economics Affairs Officer in 1963. He subsequently worked as a resident tutor at [[Lowell House]] at Harvard University.<ref name="Harvard economist enemity">{{cite web|last=Dingee|first=William R.|date=2011|title=Harvard Economist Accused of 'Spreading Enmity Between Communities'|url=https://www.thecrimson.com/flyby/article/2011/10/5/indian-india-swamy-current/|access-date=14 September 2019|publisher=[[Harvard Crimson]], Flyby The blog of The Harvard Crimson|archive-date=14 September 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190914113250/https://www.thecrimson.com/flyby/article/2011/10/5/indian-india-swamy-current/|url-status=live}}</ref>


===Family and personal life===
===Family and personal life===
Swamy met [[Roxna Kapadia]], whose father was member of [[Indian Civil Service (British India)]] and an Indian lady of [[Parsi]] ethnicity who was studying PhD in mathematics at [[Harvard University]].<ref name=":11">{{cite web|title=Perfect co-petitioners|url=http://www.livemint.com/Leisure/J7Ot7WsW7O8cytA908g5zJ/Perfect-copetitioners.html|author=Elizabeth Roche|date=8 February 2013|publisher=Livemint}}</ref><ref name="Roxna Swamy Interview">{{cite web|title=The well-regarded Supreme Court advocate on her husband: Sunit Arora Interviews Roxna Swamy|url=http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/his-views-are-those-of-a-patriotic-indian/279891|work=[[Outlook (Indian magazine)|Outlook]]|access-date=3 January 2012}}</ref> They were married in June 1966. Swamy has two daughters. The elder daughter, Gitanjali Swamy, is an entrepreneur and private equity professional. She is married to [[Sanjay Sarma]], a professor at [[MIT]], who is the son of E.A.S Sarma, a retired [[IAS officer]] and former secretary of Economic Affairs to the government of India.{{Citation needed|date=May 2021}} The younger daughter, Suhasini Haidar, is a print and television journalist married to Nadeem Haidar, the son of former [[Indian Foreign Secretary]] [[Salman Haider|Salman Haidar]].{{Citation needed|date=May 2021}}
Swamy met [[Roxna Kapadia]], whose father was member of [[Indian Civil Service (British India)]] and an Indian lady of [[Parsi]] ethnicity who was studying PhD in mathematics at [[Harvard University]].<ref name=":11">{{cite web|title=Perfect co-petitioners|url=http://www.livemint.com/Leisure/J7Ot7WsW7O8cytA908g5zJ/Perfect-copetitioners.html|author=Elizabeth Roche|date=8 February 2013|publisher=Livemint|access-date=1 September 2013|archive-date=19 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130919052426/http://www.livemint.com/Leisure/J7Ot7WsW7O8cytA908g5zJ/Perfect-copetitioners.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Roxna Swamy Interview">{{cite web|title=The well-regarded Supreme Court advocate on her husband: Sunit Arora Interviews Roxna Swamy|url=http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/his-views-are-those-of-a-patriotic-indian/279891|work=[[Outlook (Indian magazine)|Outlook]]|access-date=3 January 2012|archive-date=18 February 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160218224453/http://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/his-views-are-those-of-a-patriotic-indian/279891|url-status=live}}</ref> They were married in June 1966. Swamy has two daughters. The elder daughter, Gitanjali Swamy, is an entrepreneur and private equity professional. She is married to [[Sanjay Sarma]], a professor at [[MIT]], who is the son of E.A.S Sarma, a retired [[IAS officer]] and former secretary of Economic Affairs to the government of India.{{Citation needed|date=May 2021}} The younger daughter, Suhasini Haidar, is a print and television journalist married to Nadeem Haidar, the son of former [[Indian Foreign Secretary]] [[Salman Haider|Salman Haidar]].{{Citation needed|date=May 2021}}


===Academic career===
===Academic career===
In July 1965, immediately after obtaining his PhD in economics from [[Harvard]], Swamy joined the Department of Economics at the [[Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences]] as an assistant professor.<ref name="Swamy inscrutable" /><ref name="Swamy recovery IITD">{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/hc-swamy-s-plea-for-recovery-of-dues-from-iit_760640.html |title=High Court of Delhi : Swamy's plea for recovery of dues from IIT |date=26 February 2012 |publisher=[[Zee News]] |access-date=27 February 2012}}</ref> in 1969, he was made an associate professor.<ref name="Harvard removes Subramanian Swamy's courses over controversial column">{{cite web |url=http://www.indiaeducationreview.com/news/harvard-removes-subramanian-swamys-courses-over-controversial-column |title=Harvard removes Subramanian Swamy's courses over controversial column |publisher=Indiaeducationreview |access-date=6 January 2012 |archive-date=6 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200506023520/http://www.indiaeducationreview.com/news/harvard-removes-subramanian-swamys-courses-over-controversial-column |url-status=dead }}</ref> As an associate professor, he was invited by [[Amartya Sen]]<ref name="Subramanian Swamy - Tehelka">{{cite web|last=Malik|first=Ashok|date=31 December 2011|title=The Beastly Beatitudes: The rise, fall and resurrection of Subramanian Swamy|url=http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main51.asp?filename=Ne311211Coverstory.asp|website=Tehelka}}</ref> to occupy the chair on Chinese studies at the [[Delhi School of Economics]].<ref name="Swamy - Solution or Riddle" /> He accepted the offer and even travelled to India to take up the position, but his appointment was cancelled at the last minute due to his views on India's economic policy and also its nuclear policy.<ref name="Subramanian Swamy - Tehelka" /> at that time, [[Socialism in India|India was still partially oriented towards socialism]] and the "command economy" model instituted by [[Nehru]], and Swamy was a believer in [[market economy]].
In July 1965, immediately after obtaining his PhD in economics from [[Harvard]], Swamy joined the Department of Economics at the [[Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences]] as an assistant professor.<ref name="Swamy inscrutable" /><ref name="Swamy recovery IITD">{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/hc-swamy-s-plea-for-recovery-of-dues-from-iit_760640.html |title=High Court of Delhi : Swamy's plea for recovery of dues from IIT |date=26 February 2012 |publisher=[[Zee News]] |access-date=27 February 2012 |archive-date=28 February 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120228223522/http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/hc-swamy-s-plea-for-recovery-of-dues-from-iit_760640.html |url-status=live }}</ref> in 1969, he was made an associate professor.<ref name="Harvard removes Subramanian Swamy's courses over controversial column">{{cite web |url=http://www.indiaeducationreview.com/news/harvard-removes-subramanian-swamys-courses-over-controversial-column |title=Harvard removes Subramanian Swamy's courses over controversial column |publisher=Indiaeducationreview |access-date=6 January 2012 |archive-date=6 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200506023520/http://www.indiaeducationreview.com/news/harvard-removes-subramanian-swamys-courses-over-controversial-column |url-status=dead }}</ref> As an associate professor, he was invited by [[Amartya Sen]]<ref name="Subramanian Swamy - Tehelka">{{cite web|last=Malik|first=Ashok|date=31 December 2011|title=The Beastly Beatitudes: The rise, fall and resurrection of Subramanian Swamy|url=http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main51.asp?filename=Ne311211Coverstory.asp|website=Tehelka|access-date=13 August 2016|archive-date=16 June 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180616203848/http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main51.asp?filename=Ne311211Coverstory.asp|url-status=live}}</ref> to occupy the chair on Chinese studies at the [[Delhi School of Economics]].<ref name="Swamy - Solution or Riddle" /> He accepted the offer and even travelled to India to take up the position, but his appointment was cancelled at the last minute due to his views on India's economic policy and also its nuclear policy.<ref name="Subramanian Swamy - Tehelka" /> at that time, [[Socialism in India|India was still partially oriented towards socialism]] and the "command economy" model instituted by [[Nehru]], and Swamy was a believer in [[market economy]].


Thereafter, Swamy moved to the [[Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi]] where he was a full Professor of Mathematical Economics there from 1969 to the early 1970s.<ref name="Swamy recovery IITD" /><ref name="Swamy Rediff">{{cite web |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/mar/17sswamy.htm |title=The Rediff Special: The Man People Love to Hate |work=[[Rediff.com]]}}</ref> He was removed from the position by its board of governors in the early 1970s because of his disapproval of [[Indira Gandhi|Indira Gandhi's]] poor economic policies but was legally reinstated in the late 1990s by the [[Supreme Court of India]]. He continued in the position until 1991 when he resigned to become a cabinet minister. He served on the Board of Governors of the IIT, Delhi (1977–80) and on the Council of IITs (1980–82). He also taught economics courses at [[Harvard Summer School]]<ref>{{cite news |author=Special Correspondent |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article1455140.ece |title=Swamy to teach at Harvard |location=Chennai |work=The Hindu |date=15 February 2011}}</ref> until 2011, when the Harvard faculty voted to eliminate Swamy's courses as a result of his "offensive" statements about Muslims.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|title=Harvard kills courses by controversial summer school instructor|url=https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/12/08/harvard-kills-courses-controversial-summer-school-instructor|website=www.insidehighered.com|language=en|access-date=2020-04-02}}</ref><ref name="removal">{{Cite web|title=Harvard Instructor May Face Removal Over Anti-Muslim Op-Ed|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/07/harvard-instructor-faces-removal-over-anti-muslim-op-ed/353487/|last=Sehgal|first=Ujala|date=2011-07-30|website=The Atlantic|language=en-US|access-date=2020-04-02}}</ref>
Thereafter, Swamy moved to the [[Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi]] where he was a full Professor of Mathematical Economics there from 1969 to the early 1970s.<ref name="Swamy recovery IITD" /><ref name="Swamy Rediff">{{cite web |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/mar/17sswamy.htm |title=The Rediff Special: The Man People Love to Hate |work=[[Rediff.com]] |access-date=25 February 2012 |archive-date=15 June 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120615204718/http://www.rediff.com/news/1998/mar/17sswamy.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> He was removed from the position by its board of governors in the early 1970s because of his disapproval of [[Indira Gandhi|Indira Gandhi's]] poor economic policies but was legally reinstated in the late 1990s by the [[Supreme Court of India]]. He continued in the position until 1991 when he resigned to become a cabinet minister. He served on the Board of Governors of the IIT, Delhi (1977–80) and on the Council of IITs (1980–82). He also taught economics courses at [[Harvard Summer School]]<ref>{{cite news |author=Special Correspondent |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article1455140.ece |title=Swamy to teach at Harvard |location=Chennai |work=The Hindu |date=15 February 2011 |access-date=15 February 2011 |archive-date=25 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181225152306/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/Swamy-to-teach-at-Harvard/article15444284.ece |url-status=live }}</ref> until 2011, when the Harvard faculty voted to eliminate Swamy's courses as a result of his "offensive" statements about Muslims.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web|title=Harvard kills courses by controversial summer school instructor|url=https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/12/08/harvard-kills-courses-controversial-summer-school-instructor|website=www.insidehighered.com|date=8 December 2011|language=en|access-date=2020-04-02|archive-date=5 May 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200505211939/https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/12/08/harvard-kills-courses-controversial-summer-school-instructor|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="removal">{{Cite web|title=Harvard Instructor May Face Removal Over Anti-Muslim Op-Ed|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/07/harvard-instructor-faces-removal-over-anti-muslim-op-ed/353487/|last=Sehgal|first=Ujala|date=2011-07-30|website=The Atlantic|language=en-US|access-date=2020-04-02|archive-date=6 May 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200506115417/https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/07/harvard-instructor-faces-removal-over-anti-muslim-op-ed/353487/|url-status=live}}</ref>


Swamy currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Governors of the SCMS Group of Institutions, which includes the [[SCMS Cochin School of Business]] in [[Kochi]].<ref name=SCMSMgmt>{{cite web |title=Management |url=http://scmsgroup.org/php/showContent.php?linkid=295&partid=2 |work=SCMS Group of Institutions |publisher=SCMS Group}}</ref><ref name=in.com>{{cite web |title=Politician Subramanian Swamy |url=http://www.in.com/subramanian-swamy/profile-262171.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120603024518/http://www.in.com/subramanian-swamy/profile-262171.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-06-03 |work=in.com India |publisher=in.com (web18)}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Management |url=https://scmsgroup.org/management |website=SCMS Group of Educational Institutions |access-date=13 April 2020}}</ref>
Swamy currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Governors of the SCMS Group of Institutions, which includes the [[SCMS Cochin School of Business]] in [[Kochi]].<ref name=SCMSMgmt>{{cite web |title=Management |url=http://scmsgroup.org/php/showContent.php?linkid=295&partid=2 |work=SCMS Group of Institutions |publisher=SCMS Group |access-date=11 August 2011 |archive-date=16 September 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110916110413/http://scmsgroup.org/php/showContent.php?linkid=295&partid=2 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=in.com>{{cite web |title=Politician Subramanian Swamy |url=http://www.in.com/subramanian-swamy/profile-262171.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120603024518/http://www.in.com/subramanian-swamy/profile-262171.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=2012-06-03 |work=in.com India |publisher=in.com (web18)}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Management |url=https://scmsgroup.org/management |website=SCMS Group of Educational Institutions |access-date=13 April 2020 |archive-date=6 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200506064617/https://scmsgroup.org/management |url-status=live }}</ref>


==Political career==
==Political career==
Line 83: Line 84:
Swamy's career started with his involvement in the [[Sarvodaya Movement|Sarvodaya movement]], which was an apolitical movement but which formed the foundation of the creation of [[Janata Party]] later.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://janataparty.org/articledetail.asp?rowid=8 |title=My Experiences with Jayaprakash Narayan&nbsp;— Subramanian Swamy |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120828044859/http://janataparty.org/articledetail.asp?rowid=8 |archive-date=28 August 2012 |publisher=Janata Party Website}}</ref> The real turn in his political career came after his sacking from IIT. Liberal economic policies put forward by him did not go well with the then Prime Minister [[Indira Gandhi]] who sneered at his plans as 'Santa Claus with unrealistic ideas'. He was later expelled from the [[Indian Institute of Technology Delhi]]. This marked the beginning of his active political career. As a staunch opponent of Indira Gandhi, the opposition part, [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]] sent him to [[Rajya Sabha]] – the upper house of Indian Parliament.<ref name="Subramanian Swamy - Tehelka" />
Swamy's career started with his involvement in the [[Sarvodaya Movement|Sarvodaya movement]], which was an apolitical movement but which formed the foundation of the creation of [[Janata Party]] later.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://janataparty.org/articledetail.asp?rowid=8 |title=My Experiences with Jayaprakash Narayan&nbsp;— Subramanian Swamy |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120828044859/http://janataparty.org/articledetail.asp?rowid=8 |archive-date=28 August 2012 |publisher=Janata Party Website}}</ref> The real turn in his political career came after his sacking from IIT. Liberal economic policies put forward by him did not go well with the then Prime Minister [[Indira Gandhi]] who sneered at his plans as 'Santa Claus with unrealistic ideas'. He was later expelled from the [[Indian Institute of Technology Delhi]]. This marked the beginning of his active political career. As a staunch opponent of Indira Gandhi, the opposition part, [[Bharatiya Jana Sangh]] sent him to [[Rajya Sabha]] – the upper house of Indian Parliament.<ref name="Subramanian Swamy - Tehelka" />


He was an elected Member of Lok sabha, the lowe house of Indian Parliament five times between 1974 and 1999. As a [[Lok Sabha]] member, he represented the city of [[Mumbai North East (Lok Sabha constituency)|Mumbai North East]] twice (1977 and 1980) and later the city of [[Madurai]] (1998). As a [[Rajya Sabha]] member, herepresented Uttar Pradesh (1974) in the Parliament.<ref name="Subramanian Swamy - Tehelka" />
He was an elected Member of Lok sabha, the lower house of Indian Parliament five times between 1974 and 1999. As a [[Lok Sabha]] member, he represented the city of [[Mumbai North East (Lok Sabha constituency)|Mumbai North East]] twice (1977 and 1980) and later the city of [[Madurai]] (1998). As a [[Rajya Sabha]] member, herepresented Uttar Pradesh (1974) in the Parliament.<ref name="Subramanian Swamy - Tehelka" />


=== During the Emergency (1975–1977) ===
During the period of the [[Indian Emergency|Emergency]], he fled to the United States, seeking haven with an Indian businessman in [[Michigan]] who had become the spokesperson of the opposition in the United States. In 1976, when the Emergency was still in force and an arrest warrant had been issued in his name, Swamy came to Parliament to attend the session and managed to escape India after the session was adjourned. This act of defiance was well received in the eyes of opposition parties.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sunday-guardian.com/investigation/animosity-between-pc-swamy-spans-decades |title=Animosity between PC, Swamy spans decades |access-date=19 October 2013 |archive-date=21 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201021190232/http://www.sunday-guardian.com/investigation/animosity-between-pc-swamy-spans-decades |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/Cables-Swamy-an-ultranationalist/2013/04/13/article1542610.ece |title=Cables: Swamy, an ultranationalist |work=The New Indian Express}}</ref>
During the period of the [[Indian Emergency|Emergency]], he fled to the United States, seeking haven with an Indian businessman in [[Michigan]] who had become the spokesperson of the opposition in the United States. In 1976, when the Emergency was still in force and an arrest warrant had been issued in his name, Swamy came to Parliament to attend the session and managed to escape India after the session was adjourned. This act of defiance was well received in the eyes of opposition parties.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sunday-guardian.com/investigation/animosity-between-pc-swamy-spans-decades |title=Animosity between PC, Swamy spans decades |access-date=19 October 2013 |archive-date=21 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201021190232/http://www.sunday-guardian.com/investigation/animosity-between-pc-swamy-spans-decades |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/Cables-Swamy-an-ultranationalist/2013/04/13/article1542610.ece |title=Cables: Swamy, an ultranationalist |work=The New Indian Express |access-date=19 October 2013 |archive-date=24 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131024034748/http://newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/Cables-Swamy-an-ultranationalist/2013/04/13/article1542610.ece |url-status=dead}}</ref>


=== In Janata Party ===
In 1981, he along with [[Harish Rawat]] and 13 others led first pilgrimage to [[Mount Kailash|Kailash–]][[Lake Manasarovar|Manasarovar]] after [[Sino-Indian War|1962 Sino-Indian War]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Pathak |first=Pratul |date=31 October 1981 |title=Kailas-Manasarovar: The abode of Lord Shiva and cosmic centre of the universe |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/living/story/19811031-kailas-manasarovar-the-abode-of-lord-shiva-and-cosmic-centre-of-the-universe-773386-2013-10-30 |access-date=2022-04-21 |website=India Today |language=en}}</ref> In 1984, Swamy stated his opinion that [[Janata Party]] should focus on organisational levels of the party.<ref>{{Cite web|last=February 29|first=India Today Digital|title=I am opposed to any electoral adjustments with the communists: Subramaniam Swamy|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19840229-i-am-opposed-to-any-electoral-adjustments-with-communists-subramaniam-swamy-802811-1984-02-29|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211229203813/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19840229-i-am-opposed-to-any-electoral-adjustments-with-communists-subramaniam-swamy-802811-1984-02-29|archive-date=29 December 2021|access-date=2022-02-20|website=India Today|language=en}}</ref> In February 1984, he filed his nomination for Janata Party President against [[Chandra Shekhar]], but lost.<ref>{{Cite web|title=As countdown for Janata Party president election begins, infighting comes to the fore|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19840229-as-countdown-for-janata-party-president-election-begins-infighting-comes-to-the-fore-802830-1984-02-29|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220130045049/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19840229-as-countdown-for-janata-party-president-election-begins-infighting-comes-to-the-fore-802830-1984-02-29|archive-date=30 January 2022|website=India Today}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Janata Party's plenary session turns out to be an out-and-out Chandra Shekhar affair|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19840331-janata-party-plenary-session-turns-out-to-be-an-out-and-out-chandra-shekhar-affair-802912-1984-03-31|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220129181549/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19840331-janata-party-plenary-session-turns-out-to-be-an-out-and-out-chandra-shekhar-affair-802912-1984-03-31|archive-date=29 January 2022|website=India Today}}</ref> In the same year, 1984, Swamy was expelled from [[Janata Party]] after he levelled allegations against [[Chandra Shekhar]] that Shekhar had manipulated the Janata Party presidency election.<ref>{{Cite news |date=15 July 1984 |title=People - Swamy : refusing to kow-tow |pages=194 |work=The Illustrated Weekly of India |url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.11912/mode/2up}}</ref> Subsequently, he joined [[Lokdal|Lok Dal]], party of former Prime Minister [[Charan Singh]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Nandy |first=Pritish |date=15 May 1988 |title=The Usurpers |pages=1295 |work=The Illustrated Weekly of India |url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13141}}</ref> He fought [[1984 Indian general election|1984 Lok Sabha]] election from [[Mumbai North East Lok Sabha constituency]] on [[Lokdal|Lok Dal]] ticket, but lost.<ref>{{Cite web |title=1984 Lok Sabha elections |url=https://eci.gov.in/files/file/4118-general-election-1984-vol-i-ii/ |url-status=live}}</ref>
In 1981, he along with [[Harish Rawat]] and 13 others led first pilgrimage to [[Mount Kailash|Kailash–]][[Lake Manasarovar|Manasarovar]] after [[Sino-Indian War|1962 Sino-Indian War]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Pathak |first=Pratul |date=31 October 1981 |title=Kailas-Manasarovar: The abode of Lord Shiva and cosmic centre of the universe |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/living/story/19811031-kailas-manasarovar-the-abode-of-lord-shiva-and-cosmic-centre-of-the-universe-773386-2013-10-30 |access-date=2022-04-21 |website=India Today |language=en |archive-date=12 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220312181227/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/living/story/19811031-kailas-manasarovar-the-abode-of-lord-shiva-and-cosmic-centre-of-the-universe-773386-2013-10-30 |url-status=live }}</ref> In 1984, Swamy stated his opinion that [[Janata Party]] should focus on organisational levels of the party.<ref>{{Cite web|last=February 29|first=India Today Digital|title=I am opposed to any electoral adjustments with the communists: Subramaniam Swamy|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19840229-i-am-opposed-to-any-electoral-adjustments-with-communists-subramaniam-swamy-802811-1984-02-29|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211229203813/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19840229-i-am-opposed-to-any-electoral-adjustments-with-communists-subramaniam-swamy-802811-1984-02-29|archive-date=29 December 2021|access-date=2022-02-20|website=India Today|language=en}}</ref> In February 1984, he filed his nomination for Janata Party President against [[Chandra Shekhar]], but lost.<ref>{{Cite web|title=As countdown for Janata Party president election begins, infighting comes to the fore|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19840229-as-countdown-for-janata-party-president-election-begins-infighting-comes-to-the-fore-802830-1984-02-29|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220130045049/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19840229-as-countdown-for-janata-party-president-election-begins-infighting-comes-to-the-fore-802830-1984-02-29|archive-date=30 January 2022|website=India Today}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Janata Party's plenary session turns out to be an out-and-out Chandra Shekhar affair|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19840331-janata-party-plenary-session-turns-out-to-be-an-out-and-out-chandra-shekhar-affair-802912-1984-03-31|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220129181549/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19840331-janata-party-plenary-session-turns-out-to-be-an-out-and-out-chandra-shekhar-affair-802912-1984-03-31|archive-date=29 January 2022|website=India Today}}</ref> In the same year, 1984, Swamy was expelled from [[Janata Party]] after he levelled allegations against [[Chandra Shekhar]] that Shekhar had manipulated the Janata Party presidency election.<ref>{{Cite news |date=15 July 1984 |title=People - Swamy : refusing to kow-tow |pages=194 |work=The Illustrated Weekly of India |url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.11912/mode/2up}}</ref> Subsequently, he joined [[Lokdal|Lok Dal]], party of former Prime Minister [[Charan Singh]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Nandy |first=Pritish |date=15 May 1988 |title=The Usurpers |pages=1295 |work=The Illustrated Weekly of India |url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13141}}</ref> He fought [[1984 Indian general election|1984 Lok Sabha]] election from [[Mumbai North East Lok Sabha constituency]] on [[Lokdal|Lok Dal]] ticket, but lost.<ref>{{Cite web |title=1984 Lok Sabha elections |url=https://eci.gov.in/files/file/4118-general-election-1984-vol-i-ii/ |url-status=live |access-date=13 February 2023 |archive-date=15 May 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190515060558/https://www.eci.gov.in/files/file/4118-general-election-1984-vol-i-ii/ }}</ref>


In May 1988, Lok Dal (A) was merged with [[Janata Party]] with [[Ajit Singh (politician)|Ajit Singh]] as its president and Swamy became general secretary of Janata Party.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Nandy |first=Pritish |date=15 May 1988 |title=The Usurpers |pages=1294 |work=[[The Illustrated Weekly of India]] |url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13141}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Ajit Singh catapulted as Janata Party president |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19880615-ajit-singh-catapulted-as-janata-party-president-797348-1988-06-14 |access-date=2023-02-11 |website=India Today |language=en}}</ref> Later in October 1988, [[Janata Dal]] was formed by merging major opposition parties with Janata Party one of its constituent. But Swamy along with Indubhai Patel, [[H. D. Deve Gowda]], [[Syed Shahabuddin]], [[Sarojini Mahishi]] refused to accept the merger of Janata Party into Janata Dal and remained in Janata Party.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Blundering On |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/your-week/story/19890131-zzz-768512-2013-02-27 |access-date=2023-02-11 |website=India Today |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=State chiefs' selection deepens rift in Janata Dal |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19890315-state-chiefs-selection-deepens-rift-in-janata-dal-815855-1989-03-14 |access-date=2023-02-11 |website=India Today |language=en}}</ref>
In May 1988, Lok Dal (A) was merged with [[Janata Party]] with [[Ajit Singh (politician, born 1939)|Ajit Singh]] as its president and Swamy became general secretary of Janata Party.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Nandy |first=Pritish |date=15 May 1988 |title=The Usurpers |pages=1294 |work=[[The Illustrated Weekly of India]] |url=https://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.13141}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Ajit Singh catapulted as Janata Party president |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19880615-ajit-singh-catapulted-as-janata-party-president-797348-1988-06-14 |access-date=2023-02-11 |website=India Today |date=15 June 1988 |language=en |archive-date=11 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230211085420/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19880615-ajit-singh-catapulted-as-janata-party-president-797348-1988-06-14 |url-status=live }}</ref> Later in October 1988, [[Janata Dal]] was formed by merging major opposition parties with Janata Party one of its constituent. But Swamy along with Indubhai Patel, [[H. D. Deve Gowda]], [[Syed Shahabuddin]], [[Sarojini Mahishi]] refused to accept the merger of Janata Party into Janata Dal and remained in Janata Party.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Blundering On |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/your-week/story/19890131-zzz-768512-2013-02-27 |access-date=2023-02-11 |website=India Today |language=en |archive-date=11 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230211085421/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/your-week/story/19890131-zzz-768512-2013-02-27 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=State chiefs' selection deepens rift in Janata Dal |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19890315-state-chiefs-selection-deepens-rift-in-janata-dal-815855-1989-03-14 |access-date=2023-02-11 |website=India Today |language=en |archive-date=11 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230211085420/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/indiascope/story/19890315-state-chiefs-selection-deepens-rift-in-janata-dal-815855-1989-03-14 |url-status=live }}</ref> In December 1990, he was elected as president of [[Janata Party]] by Central Parliamentary Board.<ref>{{Cite news |date=19 December 1990 |title=Swamy elected as president |pages=2 |work=Leicester Mercury}}</ref>


===Electoral history ===
===Electoral history ===
* 1974{{ndash}}76{{mdash}}Member of [[Rajya Sabha]] from [[Uttar Pradesh]], elected on a [[Jan Sangh]] party ticket
* 1974–1976{{mdash}}Member of [[Rajya Sabha]] from [[Uttar Pradesh]], elected on a [[Jan Sangh]] party ticket
* 1977{{ndash}}80{{mdash}}Member of [[Lok Sabha]] from [[Mumbai North East (Lok Sabha constituency)|Mumbai North-East]], elected on a [[Janata Party]] ticket
* 1977–1980{{mdash}}Member of [[Lok Sabha]] from [[Mumbai North East (Lok Sabha constituency)|Mumbai North-East]], elected on a [[Janata Party]] ticket
* 1980{{ndash}}84{{mdash}}Member of [[Lok Sabha]] from [[Mumbai North East (Lok Sabha constituency)|Mumbai North-East]], elected on a [[Janata Party]] ticket
* 1980–1984{{mdash}}Member of [[Lok Sabha]] from [[Mumbai North East (Lok Sabha constituency)|Mumbai North-East]], elected on a [[Janata Party]] ticket
* 1988{{ndash}}94{{mdash}}Member of [[Rajya Sabha]] from [[Uttar Pradesh]], elected on a [[Janata Party]] ticket
* 1988–1994{{mdash}}Member of [[Rajya Sabha]] from [[Uttar Pradesh]], elected on a [[Janata Party]] ticket
* 1998{{ndash}}99{{mdash}}Member of [[Lok Sabha]] from [[Madurai (Lok Sabha constituency)|Madurai]], elected on a [[Janata Party]] ticket
* 1998–1999{{mdash}}Member of [[Lok Sabha]] from [[Madurai (Lok Sabha constituency)|Madurai]], elected on a [[Janata Party]] ticket
* 2016–22{{mdash}}Member of [[Rajya Sabha]], [[List of nominated members of Rajya Sabha|Nominated Category]]
* 2016–2022{{mdash}}Member of [[Rajya Sabha]], [[List of nominated members of Rajya Sabha|Nominated Category]]


=== Minister of Commerce and Law of India (1990–1991) ===
=== Minister of Commerce and Law of India (1990–1991) ===
During 1990 and 1991, Swamy served as a member of the [[Planning Commission (India)|Planning Commission of India]] and as Cabinet Minister of Commerce and Law. On 27 December 1990, [[Financial Times]] published an interview of Swamy by David Housego in which he claimed that the decision to raise import duties by his government is a "panic reaction".<ref>{{Cite news|date=27 December 1990|title=Liberalism with drive in New Delhi, David Housego profiles leading leading free marketeer Subramanian Swamy.|page=4|work=Financial Times|url=https://archive.org/download/FinancialTimes1990UKEnglish/Dec%2027%201990%2C%20Financial%20Times%2C%20%2331338%2C%20UK%20%28en%29.pdf}}</ref> In [[Parliament of India|Parliament]] Prime Minister [[Chandra Shekhar]] claimed that Swamy had denied what had been attributed to him in the article, but David Housego who wrote the story stood firmly by it.<ref>{{Cite magazine|author=Paranjoy Guha Thakurta |date=January 31, 1991 |title=Subramanian Swamy embarrasses himself by threatening Lok Sabha Speaker Rabi Ray|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19910131-subramanian-swamy-embarrasses-himself-by-threatening-lok-sabha-speaker-rabi-ray-813942-1991-01-31|access-date=2022-01-03|magazine=India Today|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|date=8 January 1991|title=Re. Reported Interview given by the Minister of Commerce and Minister of Law and Justice, Shri Subramaniam Swamy, to the Financial Times, London. about Taxation|url=https://eparlib.nic.in/handle/123456789/811023?view_type=browse|url-status=live|website=Lok Sabha Digital Library|last1=Gangwar |first1=Santosh Kumar |last2=Chavda |first2=Khemchandbhai |last3=Malaviya |first3=Satya Prakash |last4=Durai |first4=M. Thambi |last5=Naik |first5=Ram |last6=Kumar |first6=Nitish |last7=Shrivastava |first7=Shailendra Nath |last8=Dhumal |first8=Prem Kumar |last9=Jha |first9=Bhogendra |last10=Makkasar |first10=Shopat Singh |last11=Rao |first11=Chakilam C. Srinivas |last12=Anbarasu |first12=Era |last13=Singh |first13=Dinesh |last14=Alampadan |first14=Vijayaraghavan |last15=Kumaramangalam |first15=P. R. |last16=Kuppuswamy |first16=C. K. |last17=Chatterjee |first17=Somnath |last18=Chaudhry |first18=Kamal |last19=Khurana |first19=Madan Lal |last20=Rawat |first20=Harish |last21=Purushottam |first21=Vasant Sathe |last22=Singh |first22=Manvendra |last23=Singh |first23=Jag Pal |last24=Advani |first24=Lal Krishna |last25=Choudhury |first25=Saifuddin |last26=Yadav |first26=Janardan |last27=Kundu |first27=Samarendra |last28=Gupta |first28=Indrajit |last29=Shekhar |first29=Chandra |last30=Ray |first30=Rabi |display-authors=1 }}</ref>
During 1990 and 1991, Swamy served as a member of the [[Planning Commission (India)|Planning Commission of India]] and as Cabinet Minister of Commerce and Law. On 27 December 1990, [[Financial Times]] published an interview of Swamy by David Housego in which he claimed that the decision to raise import duties by his government is a "panic reaction".<ref>{{Cite news|date=27 December 1990|title=Liberalism with drive in New Delhi, David Housego profiles leading leading free marketeer Subramanian Swamy.|page=4|work=Financial Times|url=https://archive.org/download/FinancialTimes1990UKEnglish/Dec%2027%201990%2C%20Financial%20Times%2C%20%2331338%2C%20UK%20%28en%29.pdf}}</ref> In [[Parliament of India|Parliament]] Prime Minister [[Chandra Shekhar]] claimed that Swamy had denied what had been attributed to him in the article, but David Housego who wrote the story stood firmly by it.<ref>{{Cite magazine|author=Paranjoy Guha Thakurta|date=January 31, 1991|title=Subramanian Swamy embarrasses himself by threatening Lok Sabha Speaker Rabi Ray|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19910131-subramanian-swamy-embarrasses-himself-by-threatening-lok-sabha-speaker-rabi-ray-813942-1991-01-31|access-date=2022-01-03|magazine=India Today|language=en|archive-date=28 December 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211228192322/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19910131-subramanian-swamy-embarrasses-himself-by-threatening-lok-sabha-speaker-rabi-ray-813942-1991-01-31|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |date=8 January 1991 |title=Re. Reported Interview given by the Minister of Commerce and Minister of Law and Justice, Shri Subramaniam Swamy, to the Financial Times, London. about Taxation |url=https://eparlib.nic.in/handle/123456789/811023?view_type=browse |url-status=live |website=Lok Sabha Digital Library |last1=Gangwar |first1=Santosh Kumar |last2=Chavda |first2=Khemchandbhai |last3=Malaviya |first3=Satya Prakash |last4=Durai |first4=M. Thambi |last5=Naik |first5=Ram |last6=Kumar |first6=Nitish |last7=Shrivastava |first7=Shailendra Nath |last8=Dhumal |first8=Prem Kumar |last9=Jha |first9=Bhogendra |last10=Makkasar |first10=Shopat Singh |last11=Rao |first11=Chakilam C. Srinivas |last12=Anbarasu |first12=Era |last13=Singh |first13=Dinesh |last14=Alampadan |first14=Vijayaraghavan |last15=Kumaramangalam |first15=P. R. |last16=Kuppuswamy |first16=C. K. |last17=Chatterjee |first17=Somnath |last18=Chaudhry |first18=Kamal |last19=Khurana |first19=Madan Lal |last20=Rawat |first20=Harish |last21=Purushottam |first21=Vasant Sathe |last22=Singh |first22=Manvendra |last23=Singh |first23=Jag Pal |last24=Advani |first24=Lal Krishna |last25=Choudhury |first25=Saifuddin |last26=Yadav |first26=Janardan |last27=Kundu |first27=Samarendra |last28=Gupta |first28=Indrajit |last29=Shekhar |first29=Chandra |last30=Ray |first30=Rabi |display-authors=1 |access-date=3 January 2022 |archive-date=3 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220103183632/https://eparlib.nic.in/handle/123456789/811023?view_type=browse }}</ref>


==Later years==
==Later years==
[[File:The book "Moditva – the Idea behind the Man" being launched by Rajnath Singh.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Swamy at launching a book with BJP members in 2014.]]
[[File:The book "Moditva – the Idea behind the Man" being launched by Rajnath Singh.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Swamy at launching a book with BJP members in 2014.]]
Between 1994 and 1996, Swamy was chairman of the Commission on Labour Standards and International Trade (equivalent in rank to a cabinet minister) under Prime Minister [[P. V. Narasimha Rao]].<ref name="Subramanian Swamy - Tehelka"/> In 1997, he filed a petition against [[P. Chidambaram]] in [[Delhi High Court]], which alleged that Chidambaram had violated Prevention of Corruption Act while purchasing shares of Fairgrowth Financial Services Limited in 1991.<ref>{{Cite news|date=1997-08-20|title=Hc Notice On Swamy Plea Against Chidambaram|work=Business Standard India|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/hc-notice-on-swamy-plea-against-chidambaram-197082001148_1.html|access-date=2022-02-21}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=1997-09-06|title=Hc Issues Notice To Chidambaram|work=Business Standard India|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/hc-issues-notice-to-chidambaram-197090601218_1.html|access-date=2022-02-21}}</ref> But in 1998, Delhi High Court dismissed his petition under technical grounds.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Chidambaram, a magnet to controversy|url=https://www.rediff.com/money/2005/sep/08pc1.htm|access-date=2022-02-21|website=www.rediff.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Subraminam Swamy vs State (Nct Of Delhi & Anr) on 23 January, 1998|url=https://indiankanoon.org/doc/311227/|url-status=live|access-date=22 February 2022|website=Indian Kanoon}}</ref>
Between 1994 and 1996, Swamy was chairman of the Commission on Labour Standards and International Trade (equivalent in rank to a cabinet minister) under Prime Minister [[P. V. Narasimha Rao]].<ref name="Subramanian Swamy - Tehelka"/> In 1997, he filed a petition against [[P. Chidambaram]] in [[Delhi High Court]], which alleged that Chidambaram had violated Prevention of Corruption Act while purchasing shares of Fairgrowth Financial Services Limited in 1991.<ref>{{Cite news|date=1997-08-20|title=Hc Notice On Swamy Plea Against Chidambaram|work=Business Standard India|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/hc-notice-on-swamy-plea-against-chidambaram-197082001148_1.html|access-date=2022-02-21|archive-date=21 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220221191055/https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/hc-notice-on-swamy-plea-against-chidambaram-197082001148_1.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=1997-09-06|title=Hc Issues Notice To Chidambaram|work=Business Standard India|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/hc-issues-notice-to-chidambaram-197090601218_1.html|access-date=2022-02-21|archive-date=21 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220221191054/https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/hc-issues-notice-to-chidambaram-197090601218_1.html|url-status=live}}</ref> But in 1998, Delhi High Court dismissed his petition under technical grounds.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Chidambaram, a magnet to controversy|url=https://www.rediff.com/money/2005/sep/08pc1.htm|access-date=2022-02-21|website=www.rediff.com|archive-date=14 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220214123234/https://www.rediff.com/money/2005/sep/08pc1.htm|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Subraminam Swamy vs State (Nct Of Delhi & Anr) on 23 January, 1998|url=https://indiankanoon.org/doc/311227/|url-status=live|access-date=22 February 2022|website=Indian Kanoon|archive-date=21 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220221191059/https://indiankanoon.org/doc/311227/}}</ref>


During [[1998 Indian general election|1998 general election]], Swamy formed an alliance with [[J. Jayalalithaa]]'s [[AIADMK]] and won from [[Madurai (Lok Sabha constituency)|Madurai]] constituency.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Thomas |first1=K.M. |last2=Natarajan |first2=Anand |date=1998-02-23 |title=Tamil Nadu: Subramaniam Swamy patches up with Amma to contest jointly with AIADMK-BJP |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/nation/story/19980223-tamil-nadu-subramaniam-swamy-patches-up-with-amma-to-contest-jointly-with-aiadmk-bjp-825787-1998-02-23 |access-date=2022-03-11 |website=India Today |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Madurai |first=Constituency Profile |date=1998-02-11 |title=Rediff On The NeT: 'A BJP government at the Centre will protect the minorities' |url=https://www.rediff.com/news/1998/feb/11madur.htm |access-date=2022-03-11 |website=Rediff.com}}</ref> One year later, on 29 March 1999, Swamy organised a ''tea party'' to bring various opposition leaders together.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Kaushal |first=Pradeep |title=Encounters of a kind |work=Indian Express |url=http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/encounters-of-a-kind/289285/ |access-date=11 March 2022}}</ref> This meeting was attended by various leaders like [[Chandra Shekhar]], [[P. V. Narasimha Rao]], [[H. D. Deve Gowda]], [[J. Jayalalithaa]], [[Manmohan Singh]], [[Sonia Gandhi]] etc.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dasgupta |first=Swapan |date=26 April 1999 |title='Managing power not be a bed of roses for Congress unaccustomed to coalition politics' |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19990426-managing-power-not-be-a-bed-of-roses-for-congress-unaccustomed-to-coalition-politics-780753-1999-04-26 |access-date=2022-03-11 |website=India Today |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Rediff On The NeT: Jaya meets Sonia, warns of 'political quake' |url=https://m.rediff.com/news/1999/mar/29jaya3.htm |access-date=2022-03-11 |website=m.rediff.com}}</ref> This led to [[AIADMK]]'s withdrawal from [[National Democratic Alliance|NDA]] coalition government and the government lost the majority in the [[Lok Sabha]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Dugger |first=Celia W. |date=1999-04-15 |title=India's Ruling Party Loses Its Partner, and Its Majority Standing |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/15/world/india-s-ruling-party-loses-its-partner-and-its-majority-standing.html |access-date=2022-03-11 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Dugger |first=Celia W. |date=1999-04-18 |title=COALITION TOPPLES IN INDIA, DEFEATED BY JUST ONE VOTE |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/18/world/coalition-topples-in-india-defeated-by-just-one-vote.html |access-date=2022-03-11 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-05-10 |title=When Subramanian Swamy turned his attention to an old enemy and friend – J Jayalalithaa |url=https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/when-subramanian-swamy-turned-his-attention-old-enemy-and-friend-j-jayalalithaa-30587 |access-date=2022-03-11 |website=The News Minute |language=en}}</ref>
During [[1998 Indian general election|1998 general election]], Swamy formed an alliance with [[J. Jayalalithaa]]'s [[AIADMK]] and won from [[Madurai (Lok Sabha constituency)|Madurai]] constituency.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Thomas |first1=K.M. |last2=Natarajan |first2=Anand |date=1998-02-23 |title=Tamil Nadu: Subramaniam Swamy patches up with Amma to contest jointly with AIADMK-BJP |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/nation/story/19980223-tamil-nadu-subramaniam-swamy-patches-up-with-amma-to-contest-jointly-with-aiadmk-bjp-825787-1998-02-23 |access-date=2022-03-11 |website=India Today |language=en |archive-date=25 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210725163616/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/nation/story/19980223-tamil-nadu-subramaniam-swamy-patches-up-with-amma-to-contest-jointly-with-aiadmk-bjp-825787-1998-02-23 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Madurai |first=Constituency Profile |date=1998-02-11 |title=Rediff On The NeT: 'A BJP government at the Centre will protect the minorities' |url=https://www.rediff.com/news/1998/feb/11madur.htm |access-date=2022-03-11 |website=Rediff.com |archive-date=11 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220311175557/https://www.rediff.com/news/1998/feb/11madur.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> One year later, on 29 March 1999, Swamy organised a ''tea party'' to bring various opposition leaders together.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Kaushal |first=Pradeep |title=Encounters of a kind |work=Indian Express |url=http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/encounters-of-a-kind/289285/ |access-date=11 March 2022 |archive-date=11 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220311175558/http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/encounters-of-a-kind/289285/ |url-status=live }}</ref> This meeting was attended by various leaders like [[Chandra Shekhar]], [[P. V. Narasimha Rao]], [[H. D. Deve Gowda]], [[J. Jayalalithaa]], [[Manmohan Singh]], [[Sonia Gandhi]] etc.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Dasgupta |first=Swapan |date=26 April 1999 |title='Managing power not be a bed of roses for Congress unaccustomed to coalition politics' |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19990426-managing-power-not-be-a-bed-of-roses-for-congress-unaccustomed-to-coalition-politics-780753-1999-04-26 |access-date=2022-03-11 |website=India Today |language=en |archive-date=11 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220311175849/https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/story/19990426-managing-power-not-be-a-bed-of-roses-for-congress-unaccustomed-to-coalition-politics-780753-1999-04-26 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Rediff On The NeT: Jaya meets Sonia, warns of 'political quake' |url=https://m.rediff.com/news/1999/mar/29jaya3.htm |access-date=2022-03-11 |website=m.rediff.com |archive-date=5 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221205165352/https://m.rediff.com/news/1999/mar/29jaya3.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> This led to [[AIADMK]]'s withdrawal from [[National Democratic Alliance|NDA]] coalition government and the government lost the majority in the [[Lok Sabha]].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Dugger |first=Celia W. |date=1999-04-15 |title=India's Ruling Party Loses Its Partner, and Its Majority Standing |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/15/world/india-s-ruling-party-loses-its-partner-and-its-majority-standing.html |access-date=2022-03-11 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=11 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220311175558/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/15/world/india-s-ruling-party-loses-its-partner-and-its-majority-standing.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Dugger |first=Celia W. |date=1999-04-18 |title=COALITION TOPPLES IN INDIA, DEFEATED BY JUST ONE VOTE |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/18/world/coalition-topples-in-india-defeated-by-just-one-vote.html |access-date=2022-03-11 |issn=0362-4331 |archive-date=11 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220311175558/https://www.nytimes.com/1999/04/18/world/coalition-topples-in-india-defeated-by-just-one-vote.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-05-10 |title=When Subramanian Swamy turned his attention to an old enemy and friend – J Jayalalithaa |url=https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/when-subramanian-swamy-turned-his-attention-old-enemy-and-friend-j-jayalalithaa-30587 |access-date=2022-03-11 |website=The News Minute |language=en |archive-date=11 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220311175441/https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/when-subramanian-swamy-turned-his-attention-old-enemy-and-friend-j-jayalalithaa-30587 |url-status=live }}</ref>


He continued to be president of the Janata Party till 2013. On 11 August 2013, Swamy officially joined the [[Bharatiya Janata Party|BJP]] when its president was Rajnath Singh. His admission to the party would mark the merger of the [[Janata Party]] with the [[Bharatiya Janata Party]].<ref name="indianexpress1">{{cite web |url=http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/subramanian-swamys-janta-party-merges-with-bjp/1153983/?socialmedia |title=Subramanian Swamy's Janta Party merges with BJP |work=The Indian Express |date=11 August 2013}}</ref>
On 11 October 2004, Swamy along with [[Chandra Shekhar]] and [[George Fernandes]] formed [[Rashtriya Swabhiman Manch]] to oppose [[Sonia Gandhi]] and policies adopted by [[United Progressive Alliance|UPA]] government.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Sonia-baiters yet to reveal agenda |url=https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/india/sonia-baiters-yet-to-reveal-agenda-1.335393 |access-date=2023-03-04 |website=gulfnews.com |date=12 October 2004 |language=en |archive-date=4 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230304180139/https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/india/sonia-baiters-yet-to-reveal-agenda-1.335393 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=12 October 2004 |title=National Swabhiman Manch formed |work=The Tribune |url=https://www.tribuneindia.com/2004/20041012/nation.htm |access-date=4 March 2023 |archive-date=4 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230304180146/https://www.tribuneindia.com/2004/20041012/nation.htm |url-status=live }}</ref> He continued to be president of the Janata Party till 2013. On 11 August 2013, Swamy officially joined the [[Bharatiya Janata Party|BJP]] when its president was Rajnath Singh. His admission to the party would mark the merger of the [[Janata Party]] with the [[Bharatiya Janata Party]].<ref name="indianexpress1">{{cite web |url=http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/subramanian-swamys-janta-party-merges-with-bjp/1153983/?socialmedia |title=Subramanian Swamy's Janta Party merges with BJP |work=The Indian Express |date=11 August 2013 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=7 May 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160507101845/http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/subramanian-swamys-janta-party-merges-with-bjp/1153983/?socialmedia |url-status=live }}</ref>

On 8 April 2015, Swamy formed [[Virat Hindustan Sangam]], an [[Right-wing politics|right-wing]] cultural organisation to push issues like building [[Ram Mandir]], scrapping [[Article 370 of the Constitution of India|Article 370]] and bringing [[Uniform Civil Code]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=2015-04-08 |title=Subramanian Swamy launches Hindutva outfit |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/subramanian-swamy-launches-hindutva-outfit/articleshow/46852017.cms?from=mdr |access-date=2024-01-25 |work=The Economic Times |issn=0013-0389}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2015-04-08 |title=BJP's Subramaniam Swamy launches Hindutva outfit |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/bjps-subramaniam-swamy-launches-hindutva-outfit/ |access-date=2024-01-25 |website=The Indian Express |language=en}}</ref>


==Court petitions==
==Court petitions==


===Complaint against Jayalalithaa===
===Complaint against Jayalalithaa===
In 1996, Swamy had filed a criminal complaint against [[Jayalalithaa]] which led to [[Disproportionate Asset case against Jayalalithaa|her prosecution]], conviction and sentencing to four years imprisonment by the trial court in 2014.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2014-09-27|title=Jayalalithaa conviction: As it happened|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/live-jayalalithaa-wealth-case-verdict/article11154203.ece|access-date=2022-02-08|issn=0971-751X}}</ref> Later, on 11 May 2015, a special Bench of the [[Karnataka High Court]] set aside the trial court order convicting former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalitha, who was acquitted of all charges in the disproportionate assets case.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Dr. Subramanian Swamy vs J. Jayalalitha on 20 August, 1996|url=https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1137705/|website=[[Indian Kanoon]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Jayalalithaa guilty in assets case, Gets 4-year jail term |url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jayalalithaa-verdict-assets-case-disproportionate-special-court/1/393035.html |publisher=India Today |date=27 September 2014 |location=Bangalore |access-date=27 September 2014}}</ref> An Appeal against the High court verdict was filed in [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/supreme-court-to-hear-karnatakas-plea-against-jayalalithaas-acquittal-1231332 |title=Supreme Court to Hear Karnataka's Plea Against Jayalalithaa's Acquittal |work=NDTV |date=2015-10-12 |access-date=2016-01-18}}</ref> The final verdict of Supreme Court came in February 2017 that indicted [[Jayalalithaa|Jayalalitha]] posthumously and upheld the trial court judgement [[wikt:in toto|in toto]].<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/Jayalalithaa-Sasikala-criminally-conspired-at-Poes-Garden-to-launder-ill-gotten-wealth-SC/article17301596.ece |title=Jayalalithaa, Sasikala criminally conspired at Poes Garden to launder ill-gotten wealth: SC |last=Rajagopal |first=Krishnadas |work=The Hindu |access-date=2017-02-19 |language=en}}</ref>
In 1996, Swamy had filed a criminal complaint against [[Jayalalithaa]] which led to [[Disproportionate Asset case against Jayalalithaa|her prosecution]], conviction and sentencing to four years imprisonment by the trial court in 2014.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2014-09-27|title=Jayalalithaa conviction: As it happened|language=en-IN|work=The Hindu|url=https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/live-jayalalithaa-wealth-case-verdict/article11154203.ece|access-date=2022-02-08|issn=0971-751X|archive-date=8 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220208080816/https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/live-jayalalithaa-wealth-case-verdict/article11154203.ece|url-status=live}}</ref> Later, on 11 May 2015, a special Bench of the [[Karnataka High Court]] set aside the trial court order convicting former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalitha, who was acquitted of all charges in the disproportionate assets case.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Dr. Subramanian Swamy vs J. Jayalalitha on 20 August, 1996|url=https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1137705/|website=[[Indian Kanoon]]|access-date=8 February 2022|archive-date=8 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220208080818/https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1137705/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Jayalalithaa guilty in assets case, Gets 4-year jail term |url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jayalalithaa-verdict-assets-case-disproportionate-special-court/1/393035.html |publisher=India Today |date=27 September 2014 |location=Bangalore |access-date=27 September 2014 |archive-date=27 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140927054828/http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/jayalalithaa-verdict-assets-case-disproportionate-special-court/1/393035.html |url-status=live }}</ref> An Appeal against the High court verdict was filed in [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/supreme-court-to-hear-karnatakas-plea-against-jayalalithaas-acquittal-1231332 |title=Supreme Court to Hear Karnataka's Plea Against Jayalalithaa's Acquittal |work=NDTV |date=2015-10-12 |access-date=2016-01-18 |archive-date=31 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160131005445/http://www.ndtv.com/tamil-nadu-news/supreme-court-to-hear-karnatakas-plea-against-jayalalithaas-acquittal-1231332 |url-status=live }}</ref> The final verdict of Supreme Court came in February 2017 that indicted [[Jayalalithaa|Jayalalitha]] posthumously and upheld the trial court judgement [[wikt:in toto|in toto]].<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/Jayalalithaa-Sasikala-criminally-conspired-at-Poes-Garden-to-launder-ill-gotten-wealth-SC/article17301596.ece |title=Jayalalithaa, Sasikala criminally conspired at Poes Garden to launder ill-gotten wealth: SC |last=Rajagopal |first=Krishnadas |work=The Hindu |access-date=2017-02-19 |language=en |archive-date=14 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170214124736/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/Jayalalithaa-Sasikala-criminally-conspired-at-Poes-Garden-to-launder-ill-gotten-wealth-SC/article17301596.ece |url-status=live }}</ref>


===Phone tapping allegation===
===Phone tapping allegation===


Swamy released a letter alleging that former intelligence chief had asked [[Department of Telecommunications|DoT]] to [[Phone tapping|tap the phone]] of many politicians and businessmen in [[Karnataka]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Watch-out-Your-phone-may-be-tapped/articleshow/1190723.cms?referral=PM |title=Watch out! Your phone may be tapped |work=The Times of India}}</ref> when [[Ramakrishna Hegde]], the then Chief Minister, resigned in 1988.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/getFiles.asp?Style=OliveXLib:LowLevelEntityToPrint_TOINEW&Type=text/html&Locale=english-skin-custom&Path=TOIBG/2010/04/26&ID=Ar01501 |title=Phone-tapping allegations forced Hegde to quit in '88 }}</ref> Hegde then filed a case against him in 1989 and 1990.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1559770/ |title=Dr. Subramaniam Swamy vs Ramakrishna Hegde on 18 October, 1989 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=39307 |title= |website=judis.nic.in |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131219001856/http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=39307 |archive-date=19 December 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/scr/2012_v5_piv.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2013-12-18 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130818204917/http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/scr/2012_v5_piv.pdf |archive-date=18 August 2013 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
Swamy released a letter alleging that former intelligence chief had asked [[Department of Telecommunications|DoT]] to [[Phone tapping|tap the phone]] of many politicians and businessmen in [[Karnataka]]<ref>{{cite news |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Watch-out-Your-phone-may-be-tapped/articleshow/1190723.cms?referral=PM |title=Watch out! Your phone may be tapped |work=The Times of India |date=4 August 2005 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=9 April 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180409204132/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Watch-out-Your-phone-may-be-tapped/articleshow/1190723.cms?referral=PM |url-status=live }}</ref> when [[Ramakrishna Hegde]], the then Chief Minister, resigned in 1988.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/getFiles.asp?Style=OliveXLib%3ALowLevelEntityToPrint_TOINEW&Type=text%2Fhtml&Locale=english-skin-custom&Path=TOIBG%2F2010%2F04%2F26&ID=Ar01501 |title=Phone-tapping allegations forced Hegde to quit in '88 |access-date=18 December 2013 |archive-date=30 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330022638/http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/getFiles.asp?Style=OliveXLib%3ALowLevelEntityToPrint_TOINEW&Type=text%2Fhtml&Locale=english-skin-custom&Path=TOIBG%2F2010%2F04%2F26&ID=Ar01501 |url-status=dead }}</ref> Hegde then filed a case against him in 1989 and 1990.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1559770/ |title=Dr. Subramaniam Swamy vs Ramakrishna Hegde on 18 October, 1989 |access-date=30 March 2014 |archive-date=30 March 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140330124658/http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1559770/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=39307 |title=Judgment |language=en |access-date=22 July 2023 |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131219001856/http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=39307 |archive-date=19 December 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/scr/2012_v5_piv.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2013-12-18 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130818204917/http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/scr/2012_v5_piv.pdf |archive-date=18 August 2013 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>


===Hashimpura massacre===
===Hashimpura massacre===
{{Main|Hashimpura massacre}}
{{Main|Hashimpura massacre}}
In 1987, when Muslim youths were killed under police custody, Swamy spoke against it and sat on a fast for more than a week in Jantar Mantar demanding the institution of an inquiry.<ref>{{citation |url=http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/item/51993-why-is-bjp-always-doing-congress-a-favour?.html |title=Why is BJP always doing Congress a favour? |periodical=[[The Pioneer (Indian newspaper)|Daily Pioneer]] |date=14 July 2012 |author=Shahroze Tariq Raza |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120716233544/http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/item/51993-why-is-bjp-always-doing-congress-a-favour?.html |archive-date=16 July 2012}}</ref> After 25 years he started pursuing the case once again in court.<ref>{{citation|last=Das|first=Nairita|title=Subramanian Swamy gets brahmastra against Chidambaram|date=10 July 2012|url=http://www.oneindia.com/2012/07/10/subramanian-swamy-gets-weapon-against-chidambaram-riot-1032579.html|periodical=[[Oneindia.in|News One India]]}}</ref>
In 1987, when Muslim youths were killed under police custody, Swamy spoke against it and sat on a fast for more than a week in Jantar Mantar demanding the institution of an inquiry.<ref>{{citation |url=http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/item/51993-why-is-bjp-always-doing-congress-a-favour?.html |title=Why is BJP always doing Congress a favour? |periodical=[[The Pioneer (Indian newspaper)|Daily Pioneer]] |date=14 July 2012 |author=Shahroze Tariq Raza |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120716233544/http://www.dailypioneer.com/columnists/item/51993-why-is-bjp-always-doing-congress-a-favour?.html |archive-date=16 July 2012}}</ref> After 25 years he started pursuing the case once again in court.<ref>{{citation|last=Das|first=Nairita|title=Subramanian Swamy gets brahmastra against Chidambaram|date=10 July 2012|url=http://www.oneindia.com/2012/07/10/subramanian-swamy-gets-weapon-against-chidambaram-riot-1032579.html|periodical=[[Oneindia.in|News One India]]|access-date=13 August 2016|archive-date=21 August 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160821181639/http://www.oneindia.com/2012/07/10/subramanian-swamy-gets-weapon-against-chidambaram-riot-1032579.html|url-status=live}}</ref>


Rebecca John, a counsel for the Hashimpura complainants, told Additional Sessions Judge Rakesh Siddhartha who is conducting the trial in the case, that "there is no other motive than politics behind Swamy's plea for further investigation and it would only further delay the trial".<ref>{{cite web |author=TNN |url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/india/36215347_1_hashimpura-subramanian-swamy-janata-party-president |title=Hashimpura massacre case: Victims oppose Subramanian Swamy's plea for further probe |date=8 January 2013 |access-date=19 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130119181437/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/india/36215347_1_hashimpura-subramanian-swamy-janata-party-president |archive-date=19 January 2013 |url-status=dead |work=[[The Times of India]] |df=dmy-all }}</ref>
Rebecca John, a counsel for the Hashimpura complainants, told Additional Sessions Judge Rakesh Siddhartha who is conducting the trial in the case, that "there is no other motive than politics behind Swamy's plea for further investigation and it would only further delay the trial".<ref>{{cite web |author=TNN |url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/india/36215347_1_hashimpura-subramanian-swamy-janata-party-president |title=Hashimpura massacre case: Victims oppose Subramanian Swamy's plea for further probe |date=8 January 2013 |access-date=19 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130119181437/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-08/india/36215347_1_hashimpura-subramanian-swamy-janata-party-president |archive-date=19 January 2013 |url-status=dead |work=[[The Times of India]] |df=dmy-all }}</ref>
Line 127: Line 132:
===Role in exposing 2G spectrum case===
===Role in exposing 2G spectrum case===
{{main|2G spectrum case}}
{{main|2G spectrum case}}
In November 2008, Swamy amongst others wrote the first of five letters to Prime Minister [[Manmohan Singh]] seeking permission to prosecute [[A. Raja]] in regard to [[2G spectrum case]].<ref>{{cite news |title=2G chronology |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Chronology-of-events-in-the-2G-scam-case/Article1-805604.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120824100351/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Chronology-of-events-in-the-2G-scam-case/Article1-805604.aspx |archive-date=24 August 2012}}</ref> After not receiving any response,<ref name="spectrum corruption">{{cite web |title=2G Spectrum Shadiness |url=http://www.caravanmagazine.in/Story/615/Spectrum-Shadiness.html |work=[[The Caravan]] |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101130091658/http://caravanmagazine.in/Story/615/Spectrum-Shadiness.html |archive-date=30 November 2010 |access-date=5 May 2012}}</ref> Swamy decided to file a case on his own in the [[Supreme Court of India]] regarding the matter, which then asked the [[Central Bureau of Investigation]] to produce a detailed report on it.<ref>{{citation |date=6 February 2011 |access-date=1 August 2011 |url=http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/06/stories/2011020659910600.htm |title=CBI asked to file detailed report on 2G scam |author=Jiby Kattakayam |location=Chennai, India |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110825071135/http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/06/stories/2011020659910600.htm |archive-date=25 August 2011 |work=[[The Hindu]] |df=dmy-all}}</ref> He further called on the Indian government to re-auction the [[2G]] spectrum without the involvement of Communications Minister [[Kapil Sibal]].<ref>{{citation |url=http://in.news.yahoo.com/auction-2g-spectrum-restrain-sibal-subramanian-swamy-20110110-034015-410.html |title=Re-auction 2G spectrum, restrain Sibal: Subramanian Swamy |agency=[[Indo-Asian News Service]] |date=11 January 2011 |access-date=1 August 2011}}</ref>
In November 2008, Swamy amongst others wrote the first of five letters to Prime Minister [[Manmohan Singh]] seeking permission to prosecute [[A. Raja]] in regard to [[2G spectrum case]].<ref>{{cite news |title=2G chronology |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Chronology-of-events-in-the-2G-scam-case/Article1-805604.aspx |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120824100351/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/NewDelhi/Chronology-of-events-in-the-2G-scam-case/Article1-805604.aspx |archive-date=24 August 2012}}</ref> After not receiving any response,<ref name="spectrum corruption">{{cite web |title=2G Spectrum Shadiness |url=http://www.caravanmagazine.in/Story/615/Spectrum-Shadiness.html |work=[[The Caravan]] |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101130091658/http://caravanmagazine.in/Story/615/Spectrum-Shadiness.html |archive-date=30 November 2010 |access-date=5 May 2012}}</ref> Swamy decided to file a case on his own in the [[Supreme Court of India]] regarding the matter, which then asked the [[Central Bureau of Investigation]] to produce a detailed report on it.<ref>{{citation |date=6 February 2011 |access-date=1 August 2011 |url=http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/06/stories/2011020659910600.htm |title=CBI asked to file detailed report on 2G scam |author=Jiby Kattakayam |location=Chennai, India |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110825071135/http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/06/stories/2011020659910600.htm |archive-date=25 August 2011 |work=[[The Hindu]] |df=dmy-all}}</ref> He further called on the Indian government to re-auction the [[2G]] spectrum without the involvement of Communications Minister [[Kapil Sibal]].<ref>{{citation |url=http://in.news.yahoo.com/auction-2g-spectrum-restrain-sibal-subramanian-swamy-20110110-034015-410.html |title=Re-auction 2G spectrum, restrain Sibal: Subramanian Swamy |agency=[[Indo-Asian News Service]] |date=11 January 2011 |access-date=1 August 2011 |archive-date=19 May 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120519123818/http://in.news.yahoo.com/auction-2g-spectrum-restrain-sibal-subramanian-swamy-20110110-034015-410.html |url-status=live }}</ref>


On 15 April 2011, he filed a 206-page petition with PM Singh seeking permission to prosecute [[Sonia Gandhi]] on charges of corruption. He also raised doubts regarding her acquisition of Indian citizenship.<ref>{{citation |url=http://newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/article383222.ece |work=The New Indian Express |title=Permit me to prosecute Sonia: Swamy |date=19 April 2011 |access-date=1 August 2011}}</ref> Swamy filed documents in the court to prosecute [[Minister for Home Affairs (India)|Minister of Home Affairs]] [[P. Chidambaram]] by including a 15 January 2008 letter written by Chidambaram to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Swamy also placed on record the certified copy of the minutes of a meeting between Chidambaram, Raja and the prime minister during the tenure of Raja as the MOC&IT.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/2g-case-subramanian-swamy-submits-documents-against-chidambaram-arguments-on-january-21/articleshow/11399259.cms |title=2G case: Subramanian Swamy submits documents against Chidambaram, arguments on January 21 |work=The Economic Times |date=7 January 2012 |access-date=7 January 2012}}</ref> Since criminal charges were filed against the accused, but no evidence was given by Swamy or the CBI, all the respondents have got bail as of July 2012.
On 15 April 2011, he filed a 206-page petition with PM Singh seeking permission to prosecute [[Sonia Gandhi]] on charges of corruption. He also raised doubts regarding her acquisition of Indian citizenship.<ref>{{citation |url=http://newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/article383222.ece |work=The New Indian Express |title=Permit me to prosecute Sonia: Swamy |date=19 April 2011 |access-date=1 August 2011 |archive-date=27 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150227050537/http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/article383222.ece |url-status=dead }}</ref> Swamy filed documents in the court to prosecute [[Minister for Home Affairs (India)|Minister of Home Affairs]] [[P. Chidambaram]] by including a 15 January 2008 letter written by Chidambaram to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Swamy also placed on record the certified copy of the minutes of a meeting between Chidambaram, Raja and the prime minister during the tenure of Raja as the MOC&IT.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/2g-case-subramanian-swamy-submits-documents-against-chidambaram-arguments-on-january-21/articleshow/11399259.cms |title=2G case: Subramanian Swamy submits documents against Chidambaram, arguments on January 21 |work=The Economic Times |date=7 January 2012 |access-date=7 January 2012 |archive-date=30 March 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190330045759/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/2g-case-subramanian-swamy-submits-documents-against-chidambaram-arguments-on-january-21/articleshow/11399259.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> Since criminal charges were filed against the accused, but no evidence was given by Swamy or the CBI, all the respondents have got bail as of July 2012.


====Sanction to prosecute telecom minister A. Raja====
====Sanction to prosecute telecom minister A. Raja====
On 31 January 2012, the [[Supreme Court of India]] accepted Swamy's petition against the [[Prime Minister's Office (India)|Prime Minister's Office]] in the 2G case, saying that all public authorities should give a sanction within three months against any public official if a request is made for prosecution.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/2g-case-sc-allows-swamys-petition-on-grant-of-sanction/articleshow/11696767.cms|title=2G case: SC allows Swamy's petition on grant of sanction|date=2012-01-31|work=The Economic Times|access-date=2020-01-01}}</ref>
On 31 January 2012, the [[Supreme Court of India]] accepted Swamy's petition against the [[Prime Minister's Office (India)|Prime Minister's Office]] in the 2G case, saying that all public authorities should give a sanction within three months against any public official if a request is made for prosecution.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/2g-case-sc-allows-swamys-petition-on-grant-of-sanction/articleshow/11696767.cms|title=2G case: SC allows Swamy's petition on grant of sanction|date=2012-01-31|work=The Economic Times|access-date=2020-01-01|archive-date=22 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200322154639/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/2g-case-sc-allows-swamys-petition-on-grant-of-sanction/articleshow/11696767.cms|url-status=live}}</ref>


The Supreme Court said that Swamy had the [[locus standi]] to seek sanction from the Prime Minister for the prosecution of A. Raja in the 2G case. Sanction by a competent authority for the prosecution of a public servant has to be granted within a time frame, the apex court said. Justice [[AK Ganguly]] said that the sanction would be deemed to be granted if competent authority failed to take a decision within four months.<ref>{{Cite web|last1=|first1=|title=Prosecuting corrupt officials: SC sets deadline for govt|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Prosecuting-corrupt-officials-SC-sets-deadline-for-govt/articleshow/11696857.cms|access-date=2020-01-01|website=The Times of India|language=en}}</ref>
The Supreme Court said that Swamy had the [[locus standi]] to seek sanction from the Prime Minister for the prosecution of A. Raja in the 2G case. Sanction by a competent authority for the prosecution of a public servant has to be granted within a time frame, the apex court said. Justice [[AK Ganguly]] said that the sanction would be deemed to be granted if competent authority failed to take a decision within four months.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=|first1=|title=Prosecuting corrupt officials: SC sets deadline for govt|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Prosecuting-corrupt-officials-SC-sets-deadline-for-govt/articleshow/11696857.cms|access-date=2020-01-01|website=The Times of India|date=31 January 2012|language=en|archive-date=2 April 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200402043143/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Prosecuting-corrupt-officials-SC-sets-deadline-for-govt/articleshow/11696857.cms|url-status=live}}</ref>


Swamy's arguments were that he wrote to the PMO on 29 November 2008, but it was only on 19 March 2010 the PMO replied that the plea made by Swamy was "premature" as investigation was being carried out by the [[Central Bureau of Investigation]] (CBI).Raja was arrested by the CBI in the case and got bail on 15 May 2012 after spending nearly 15 months in the [[Tihar Jail|Tihar Central Jail]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3421102.ece |location=Chennai |work=The Hindu |title=Raja gets bail, walks out of Tihar jail |date=15 May 2012}}</ref>
Swamy's arguments were that he wrote to the PMO on 29 November 2008, but it was only on 19 March 2010 the PMO replied that the plea made by Swamy was "premature" as investigation was being carried out by the [[Central Bureau of Investigation]] (CBI).Raja was arrested by the CBI in the case and got bail on 15 May 2012 after spending nearly 15 months in the [[Tihar Jail|Tihar Central Jail]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3421102.ece |location=Chennai |work=The Hindu |title=Raja gets bail, walks out of Tihar jail |date=15 May 2012 |access-date=20 May 2012 |archive-date=18 May 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120518081702/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3421102.ece |url-status=live }}</ref>


On 21 December 2017, the special CBI Court Judge acquitted the accused including [[A. Raja]].<ref>[https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/2g-scam-verdict-today/liveblog/62187750.cms 2G scam case: All accused acquitted]</ref>
On 21 December 2017, the special CBI Court Judge acquitted the accused including [[A. Raja]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/2g-scam-verdict-today/liveblog/62187750.cms |title=2G scam case: All accused acquitted |website=[[The Times of India]] |date=21 December 2017 |access-date=21 December 2017 |archive-date=22 December 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171222060824/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/2g-scam-verdict-today/liveblog/62187750.cms |url-status=live }}</ref>


=== Petition to strike down "single directive provision" ===
=== Petition to strike down "single directive provision" ===
In 1997, Swamy filed a petition in the [[Supreme Court of India]] to strike down a provision which barred [[Central Bureau of Investigation|CBI]] from investigating corruption charges against officers of the rank of joint secretary and above without prior permission of the [[Government of India]] called as ''"Dr. Subramanian Swamy Versus Director, Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr."''<ref name="With govt's single directive, law no longer above all">{{cite news|date=14 February 2005|title=With govt's single directive, law no longer above all|work=The Times of India|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/With-govts-single-directive-law-no-longer-above-all/articleshow/1019946.cms|access-date=6 May 2014}}</ref> on 6 May 2014, a five-judge [[Constitution Bench (India)|constitution bench]] held the single directive provision as invalid and unconstitutional. The court said that "Protection of prior approval for probing graft charges against officers at level of joint secretary and above has propensity of shielding corruption."<ref>{{cite news|date=6 May 2014|title=CBI can investigate corruption charges against top babus without govt nod: SC|work=The Times of India|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/CBI-can-investigate-corruption-charges-against-top-babus-without-govt-nod-SC/articleshow/34726114.cms|access-date=6 May 2014}}</ref><ref name="Supreme Court Judgement in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 38 OF 1997">{{cite web |title=Supreme Court Judgement in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 38 OF 1997 |url=http://sci.nic.in/outtoday/41503.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140506183826/http://sci.nic.in/outtoday/41503.pdf |archive-date=2014-05-06}}</ref> Incumbent CBI Director [[Ranjit Sinha]] welcomed the judgement and said, "now a very heavy responsibility has been cast upon us to ensure that no innocent civil-servant is harassed."<ref name="CBI welcomes Supreme Court decision">{{cite news |title=CBI welcomes Supreme Court decision |url=http://www.aninews.in/newsdetail2/story167291/cbi-welcomes-supreme-court-decision-on-investigating-officers-of-jt-secretary-rank.html |access-date=6 May 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140511030532/http://www.aninews.in/newsdetail2/story167291/cbi-welcomes-supreme-court-decision-on-investigating-officers-of-jt-secretary-rank.html |archive-date=11 May 2014 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>
In 1997, Swamy filed a petition in the [[Supreme Court of India]] to strike down a provision which barred [[Central Bureau of Investigation|CBI]] from investigating corruption charges against officers of the rank of joint secretary and above without prior permission of the [[Government of India]] called as ''"Dr. Subramanian Swamy Versus Director, Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr."''<ref name="With govt's single directive, law no longer above all">{{cite news|date=14 February 2005|title=With govt's single directive, law no longer above all|work=The Times of India|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/With-govts-single-directive-law-no-longer-above-all/articleshow/1019946.cms|access-date=6 May 2014|archive-date=12 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112235601/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/With-govts-single-directive-law-no-longer-above-all/articleshow/1019946.cms|url-status=live}}</ref> on 6 May 2014, a five-judge [[Constitution Bench (India)|constitution bench]] held the single directive provision as invalid and unconstitutional. The court said that "Protection of prior approval for probing graft charges against officers at level of joint secretary and above has propensity of shielding corruption."<ref>{{cite news|date=6 May 2014|title=CBI can investigate corruption charges against top babus without govt nod: SC|work=The Times of India|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/CBI-can-investigate-corruption-charges-against-top-babus-without-govt-nod-SC/articleshow/34726114.cms|access-date=6 May 2014|archive-date=6 May 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140506134446/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/CBI-can-investigate-corruption-charges-against-top-babus-without-govt-nod-SC/articleshow/34726114.cms|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Supreme Court Judgement in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 38 OF 1997">{{cite web |title=Supreme Court Judgement in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 38 OF 1997 |url=http://sci.nic.in/outtoday/41503.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140506183826/http://sci.nic.in/outtoday/41503.pdf |archive-date=2014-05-06}}</ref> Incumbent CBI Director [[Ranjit Sinha]] welcomed the judgement and said, "now a very heavy responsibility has been cast upon us to ensure that no innocent civil-servant is harassed."<ref name="CBI welcomes Supreme Court decision">{{cite news |title=CBI welcomes Supreme Court decision |url=http://www.aninews.in/newsdetail2/story167291/cbi-welcomes-supreme-court-decision-on-investigating-officers-of-jt-secretary-rank.html |access-date=6 May 2014 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140511030532/http://www.aninews.in/newsdetail2/story167291/cbi-welcomes-supreme-court-decision-on-investigating-officers-of-jt-secretary-rank.html |archive-date=11 May 2014 |df=dmy-all}}</ref>


===Investigation on EVM===
===Investigation on EVM===
{{further|Indian voting machines}}
{{further|Indian voting machines}}


Swamy demanded that an independent committee should be formed to check the security and safety of the [[Indian voting machines|Electronic Voting Machines]] (EVM) to avoid any rigging or tampering. He demanded that a printed receipt should be given to every voter after casting the vote.<ref>{{cite news |author=Special Correspondent |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/swamy-for-expert-panel-on-secure-evms/article106271.ece |title=Swamy for expert panel on secure EVMs |location=CHENNAI |work=The Hindu |date=13 February 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/evms-not-tamperfree/article712729.ece |title=EVMs not tamper-free |work=The Hindu |date=18 February 2010}}</ref> His [[Public-interest litigation (India)|PIL]] to investigate the working of EVM was dismissed by the [[Delhi High Court]] on 17 January 2012. The court refused to give any direction to the [[Election Commission of India|Election Commission]] to bring back paper-ballot system or use of printed receipts. The Commission argued that the use of paper is not feasible due to the huge size of Indian electorate. The court further asked the Election Commission to "immediately begin a process of wider consultations" and the Parliament "to go into this question in depth and decide".<ref>{{cite web |author=Anita |url=http://www.oneindia.com/2012/01/17/delhi-hc-says-not-impossible-to-tamper-evm-s.html |title=Delhi High Court says not impossible to tamper EVMs |work=OneIndia |date=17 January 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/delhi-hc-rejects-swamys-plea-to-bring-back-paper-ballots/900646 |title=Delhi HC rejects Swamy's plea to bring back paper ballots |work=The Indian Express |date=17 January 2012}}</ref>
Swamy demanded that an independent committee should be formed to check the security and safety of the [[Indian voting machines|Electronic Voting Machines]] (EVM) to avoid any rigging or tampering. He demanded that a printed receipt should be given to every voter after casting the vote.<ref>{{cite news |author=Special Correspondent |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/swamy-for-expert-panel-on-secure-evms/article106271.ece |title=Swamy for expert panel on secure EVMs |location=CHENNAI |work=The Hindu |date=13 February 2010 |access-date=23 July 2013 |archive-date=12 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112235601/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/tamil-nadu/swamy-for-expert-panel-on-secure-evms/article106271.ece |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/evms-not-tamperfree/article712729.ece |title=EVMs not tamper-free |work=The Hindu |date=18 February 2010 |access-date=18 January 2013 |archive-date=12 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112235601/http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/evms-not-tamperfree/article712729.ece |url-status=live }}</ref> His [[Public-interest litigation (India)|PIL]] to investigate the working of EVM was dismissed by the [[Delhi High Court]] on 17 January 2012. The court refused to give any direction to the [[Election Commission of India|Election Commission]] to bring back paper-ballot system or use of printed receipts. The Commission argued that the use of paper is not feasible due to the huge size of Indian electorate. The court further asked the Election Commission to "immediately begin a process of wider consultations" and the Parliament "to go into this question in depth and decide".<ref>{{cite web |author=Anita |url=http://www.oneindia.com/2012/01/17/delhi-hc-says-not-impossible-to-tamper-evm-s.html |title=Delhi High Court says not impossible to tamper EVMs |work=OneIndia |date=17 January 2012 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=21 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160821162836/http://www.oneindia.com/2012/01/17/delhi-hc-says-not-impossible-to-tamper-evm-s.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/delhi-hc-rejects-swamys-plea-to-bring-back-paper-ballots/900646 |title=Delhi HC rejects Swamy's plea to bring back paper ballots |work=The Indian Express |date=17 January 2012 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=14 February 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160214065733/http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/delhi-hc-rejects-swamys-plea-to-bring-back-paper-ballots/900646 |url-status=live }}</ref>


On 22 January 2013 the [[Election Commission of India|Election Commission]] informed the [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]] that it would include [[Voter-verified paper audit trail|Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail]] (VVPAT) system which is in the testing phase after the court agreed with some points raised by Swamy who was the contender,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/outtoday/9093.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2015-10-10 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303231056/http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/outtoday/9093.pdf |archive-date=3 March 2016 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> in the machines so that every voter will come to know who he/she is voting by getting a printed slip after pressing the EVM button.<ref>{{cite web |author=PTI |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Voter-to-get-paper-receipt-after-casting-ballot-EC-tells-SC/articleshow/18134882.cms?referral=PM |title=Voter to get paper receipt after casting ballot: EC tells SC |work=The Times of India |date=22 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |author=Legal Correspondent |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/voter-paper-trail-in-phases-ec/article4333597.ece |title=Voter paper trail in phases: EC |work=The Hindu |date=23 January 2013}}</ref> The voter paper audit trail has then been in use from 4 September 2013.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jagranjosh.com/current-affairs/ec-to-use-voter-verifiable-paper-audit-trail-vvpat-system-in-nagaland-bypolls-1376729528-1 |title=EC to use Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) System in Nagaland by-polls |work=Jagranjosh.com|date=17 August 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/new-delhi-voters-can-verify-who-they-voted-for/article5362745.ece |title=New Delhi voters can verify who they voted for |work=The Hindu|date=18 November 2013 }}</ref>
On 22 January 2013 the [[Election Commission of India|Election Commission]] informed the [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]] that it would include [[Voter-verified paper audit trail|Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail]] (VVPAT) system which is in the testing phase after the court agreed with some points raised by Swamy who was the contender,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/outtoday/9093.pdf |title=Archived copy |access-date=2015-10-10 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303231056/http://supremecourtofindia.nic.in/outtoday/9093.pdf |archive-date=3 March 2016 |df=dmy-all}}</ref> in the machines so that every voter will come to know who he/she is voting by getting a printed slip after pressing the EVM button.<ref>{{cite web |author=PTI |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Voter-to-get-paper-receipt-after-casting-ballot-EC-tells-SC/articleshow/18134882.cms?referral=PM |title=Voter to get paper receipt after casting ballot: EC tells SC |work=The Times of India |date=22 January 2013 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=2 April 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190402203349/https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Voter-to-get-paper-receipt-after-casting-ballot-EC-tells-SC/articleshow/18134882.cms?referral=PM |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |author=Legal Correspondent |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/voter-paper-trail-in-phases-ec/article4333597.ece |title=Voter paper trail in phases: EC |work=The Hindu |date=23 January 2013 |access-date=24 February 2013 |archive-date=3 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203214457/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/voter-paper-trail-in-phases-ec/article4333597.ece |url-status=live }}</ref> The voter paper audit trail has then been in use from 4 September 2013.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jagranjosh.com/current-affairs/ec-to-use-voter-verifiable-paper-audit-trail-vvpat-system-in-nagaland-bypolls-1376729528-1 |title=EC to use Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) System in Nagaland by-polls |work=Jagranjosh.com |date=17 August 2013 |access-date=18 November 2013 |archive-date=23 November 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131123123325/http://www.jagranjosh.com/current-affairs/ec-to-use-voter-verifiable-paper-audit-trail-vvpat-system-in-nagaland-bypolls-1376729528-1 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/new-delhi-voters-can-verify-who-they-voted-for/article5362745.ece |title=New Delhi voters can verify who they voted for |work=The Hindu |date=18 November 2013 |access-date=18 November 2013 |archive-date=3 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131203212718/http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/new-delhi-voters-can-verify-who-they-voted-for/article5362745.ece |url-status=live }}</ref>


On 8 October 2013 the Supreme Court directed the Election Commission to implement audit trail system in [[2014 Indian general election|2014 general election]] in phases.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jagranjosh.com/current-affairs/supreme-court-1381300734-1 |title=Supreme Court Directed Election Commission to Install VVPAT System in EVMs for 2014 Polls |work=Jagranjosh.com|date=9 October 2013 }}</ref>
On 8 October 2013 the Supreme Court directed the Election Commission to implement audit trail system in [[2014 Indian general election|2014 general election]] in phases.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.jagranjosh.com/current-affairs/supreme-court-1381300734-1 |title=Supreme Court Directed Election Commission to Install VVPAT System in EVMs for 2014 Polls |work=Jagranjosh.com |date=9 October 2013 |access-date=18 November 2013 |archive-date=23 November 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131123120525/http://www.jagranjosh.com/current-affairs/supreme-court-1381300734-1 |url-status=live }}</ref>


===National Herald case ===
===National Herald case ===
{{Main|National Herald Case}}
{{Main|National Herald Case}}
On 1 November 2012 Swamy alleged that both [[Sonia Gandhi|Sonia]] and [[Rahul Gandhi]] have committed fraud and [[land grabbing]] to a tune of {{INRConvert|20|b}} by acquiring a public ltd company called Associated Journals Private Ltd (AJPL) through their owned private company, Young Indian<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/national-herald-case-where-the-matter-stands/ |title=National Herald case explained: Everything that you need to know |publisher=[[The Indian Express]] |date=8 December 2015}}</ref> which was formed on 23 November 2010.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/congress-to-revive-national-herald-challenges-swamy-to-take-it-to-court/article4058571.ece |title=Congress to revive National Herald, challenges Swamy to take it to court |work=The Hindu |date=3 November 2015|last1=Gupta |first1=Smita }}</ref> Through this they had got publication rights of ''[[The National Herald (India)|National Herald]]'' and ''[[Qaumi Awaz]]'' newspapers, with real estate properties in Delhi and Uttar Pradesh.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/national-herald-case-enforcement-directorate-mulling-probe-possibility/article7959871.ece |title=National Herald case: Enforcement Directorate mulling probe possibility |work=The Hindu |date=8 December 2015|last1=Pandey |first1=Devesh K. }}</ref> The acquired place was intended only for newspaper purposes but were used for running a passport office, amounting to [[crore]]s of rupees, it alleges.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/wealth/personal-finance-news/national-herald-case-heres-how-much-associated-journals-seven-properties-worth/articleshow/50165303.cms|title=National Herald case: Here's how much Associated Journals' seven properties worth|last1=Babar|first1=Kailash|date=2015-12-14|work=The Economic Times|access-date=2020-01-01|last2=Sharma|first2=Ravi Teja}}</ref> Swamy further added that Rahul Gandhi hid the facts in his affidavit while filing nomination for the [[2009 Indian general election|2009 Lok Sabha elections]].<ref>{{cite web |author=Sanjay Singh |url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/swamy-does-a-kejriwal-targets-sonia-rahul-for-landgrab-511644.html |title=Swamy does a Kejriwal, targets Sonia & Rahul for landgrab |publisher=Firstpost |date=1 November 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=New Delhi, 1 Nov 2012, DHNS |url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/289449/swamy-accuses-sonia-rahul-property.html |title=Swamy accuses Sonia, Rahul of property fraud |work=Deccan Herald |date=1 November 2012}}</ref>
On 1 November 2012 Swamy alleged that both [[Sonia Gandhi|Sonia]] and [[Rahul Gandhi]] have committed fraud and [[land grabbing]] to a tune of {{INRConvert|20|b}} by acquiring a public ltd company called Associated Journals Private Ltd (AJPL) through their owned private company, Young Indian<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/national-herald-case-where-the-matter-stands/ |title=National Herald case explained: Everything that you need to know |publisher=[[The Indian Express]] |date=8 December 2015 |access-date=8 December 2015 |archive-date=19 December 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151219084153/http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/national-herald-case-where-the-matter-stands/ |url-status=live }}</ref> which was formed on 23 November 2010.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/congress-to-revive-national-herald-challenges-swamy-to-take-it-to-court/article4058571.ece |title=Congress to revive National Herald, challenges Swamy to take it to court |work=The Hindu |date=3 November 2015 |last1=Gupta |first1=Smita |access-date=8 November 2012 |archive-date=27 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150227075827/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/congress-to-revive-national-herald-challenges-swamy-to-take-it-to-court/article4058571.ece |url-status=live }}</ref> Through this they had got publication rights of ''[[The National Herald (India)|National Herald]]'' and ''[[Qaumi Awaz]]'' newspapers, with real estate properties in Delhi and Uttar Pradesh.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/national-herald-case-enforcement-directorate-mulling-probe-possibility/article7959871.ece |title=National Herald case: Enforcement Directorate mulling probe possibility |work=The Hindu |date=8 December 2015 |last1=Pandey |first1=Devesh K. |access-date=8 December 2015 |archive-date=12 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112235601/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/national-herald-case-enforcement-directorate-mulling-probe-possibility/article7959871.ece |url-status=live }}</ref> The acquired place was intended only for newspaper purposes but were used for running a passport office, amounting to [[crore]]s of rupees, it alleges.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/wealth/personal-finance-news/national-herald-case-heres-how-much-associated-journals-seven-properties-worth/articleshow/50165303.cms|title=National Herald case: Here's how much Associated Journals' seven properties worth|last1=Babar|first1=Kailash|date=2015-12-14|work=The Economic Times|access-date=2020-01-01|last2=Sharma|first2=Ravi Teja|archive-date=5 March 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200305222034/https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/wealth/personal-finance-news/national-herald-case-heres-how-much-associated-journals-seven-properties-worth/articleshow/50165303.cms|url-status=live}}</ref> Swamy further added that Rahul Gandhi hid the facts in his affidavit while filing nomination for the [[2009 Indian general election|2009 Lok Sabha elections]].<ref>{{cite web |author=Sanjay Singh |url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/swamy-does-a-kejriwal-targets-sonia-rahul-for-landgrab-511644.html |title=Swamy does a Kejriwal, targets Sonia & Rahul for landgrab |publisher=Firstpost |date=1 November 2012 |access-date=8 November 2012 |archive-date=23 May 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140523184238/http://www.firstpost.com/politics/swamy-does-a-kejriwal-targets-sonia-rahul-for-landgrab-511644.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=New Delhi, 1 Nov 2012, DHNS |url=http://www.deccanherald.com/content/289449/swamy-accuses-sonia-rahul-property.html |title=Swamy accuses Sonia, Rahul of property fraud |work=Deccan Herald |date=1 November 2012 |access-date=8 November 2012 |archive-date=26 April 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150426082136/http://www.deccanherald.com/content/289449/swamy-accuses-sonia-rahul-property.html |url-status=live }}</ref>


It further alleges that on 26 February 2011 AJPL approved the transfer of [[Unsecured debt|unsecured loan]] of {{INRConvert|900|m}} from the [[All India Congress Committee]] at zero interest.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/rahul-threatens-to-sue-subramanian-swamy/article4055087.ece |title=Rahul threatens to sue Subramanian Swamy |work=The Hindu |date=2 November 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.indiatoday.in/story/national-herald-case-sonia-gandhi-rahul-will-have-to-appear-in-court/1/540297.html |title=National Herald case: Sonia Gandhi, Rahul will have to appear in court |publisher=[[India Today]] |date=7 December 2015}}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> Swamy argued that it is illegal for any political party to lend the loan as per violation of Section 269T of Income Tax Act 1961.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/what-is-the-national-herald-case-all-about/1/541733.html |title=What is the National Herald case all about? |publisher=[[India Today]] |date=8 December 2015}}</ref> on 2 November, the party responded that the loan was given only for reviving National Herald newspaper with no commercial interest.<ref>{{cite news |author=Smita Gupta |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/congress-to-revive-national-herald-challenges-swamy-to-take-it-to-court/article4058571.ece |title=Congress to revive National Herald, challenges Swamy to take it to court |work=The Hindu |date=2 November 2012}}</ref> Swamy decided to approach the Supreme Court for de-recognising the Congress party, while the Election Commission ordered the probe on 17 November 2012.<ref>{{cite news |agency=Press Trust of India |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/swamy-to-move-court-against-ec/article4073917.ece |title=Swamy to move court against EC |work=The Hindu |date=7 November 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.news18.com/news/politics/ec-orders-probe-against-rahul-gandhi-for-wrong-information-522167.html |title=EC orders probe against Rahul Gandhi for 'wrong information' about his assets- Politics News- Politics-IBNLive |publisher=Ibnlive.in.com |date=17 November 2012}}</ref>
It further alleges that on 26 February 2011 AJPL approved the transfer of [[Unsecured debt|unsecured loan]] of {{INRConvert|900|m}} from the [[All India Congress Committee]] at zero interest.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/rahul-threatens-to-sue-subramanian-swamy/article4055087.ece |title=Rahul threatens to sue Subramanian Swamy |work=The Hindu |date=2 November 2012 |access-date=8 December 2015 |archive-date=12 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112235601/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/rahul-threatens-to-sue-subramanian-swamy/article4055087.ece |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.indiatoday.in/story/national-herald-case-sonia-gandhi-rahul-will-have-to-appear-in-court/1/540297.html |title=National Herald case: Sonia Gandhi, Rahul will have to appear in court |publisher=[[India Today]] |date=7 December 2015}}{{dead link|date=May 2016|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}}</ref> Swamy argued that it is illegal for any political party to lend the loan as per violation of Section 269T of Income Tax Act 1961.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/what-is-the-national-herald-case-all-about/1/541733.html |title=What is the National Herald case all about? |publisher=[[India Today]] |date=8 December 2015 |access-date=9 December 2015 |archive-date=20 December 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151220133357/http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/what-is-the-national-herald-case-all-about/1/541733.html |url-status=live }}</ref> on 2 November, the party responded that the loan was given only for reviving National Herald newspaper with no commercial interest.<ref>{{cite news |author=Smita Gupta |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/congress-to-revive-national-herald-challenges-swamy-to-take-it-to-court/article4058571.ece |title=Congress to revive National Herald, challenges Swamy to take it to court |work=The Hindu |date=2 November 2012 |access-date=8 November 2012 |archive-date=27 February 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150227075827/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/congress-to-revive-national-herald-challenges-swamy-to-take-it-to-court/article4058571.ece |url-status=live }}</ref> Swamy decided to approach the Supreme Court for de-recognising the Congress party, while the Election Commission ordered the probe on 17 November 2012.<ref>{{cite news |agency=Press Trust of India |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/swamy-to-move-court-against-ec/article4073917.ece |title=Swamy to move court against EC |work=The Hindu |date=7 November 2012 |access-date=8 November 2012 |archive-date=10 November 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121110190024/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/swamy-to-move-court-against-ec/article4073917.ece |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.news18.com/news/politics/ec-orders-probe-against-rahul-gandhi-for-wrong-information-522167.html |title=EC orders probe against Rahul Gandhi for 'wrong information' about his assets- Politics News- Politics-IBNLive |publisher=Ibnlive.in.com |date=17 November 2012 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=22 September 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160922172350/http://www.news18.com/news/politics/ec-orders-probe-against-rahul-gandhi-for-wrong-information-522167.html |url-status=live }}</ref>


The hearing of the case had been taken up thereafter on different occasions<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.oneindia.com/2013/03/16/subramanian-swamy-s-victory-against-sonia-rahul-gandhi-1173225.html |title=Subramanian Swamy's victory against Sonia, Rahul Gandhi |publisher=One India |date=16 March 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/national-herald-acquisition-delhi-court-summons-roc-to-testify-records.html |title=National Herald Acquisition: Delhi Court Summons ROC to Testify Records |publisher=dailypioneer |date=29 April 2014}}</ref><ref name="Zee News">{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/court-summons-sonia-gandhi-rahul-in-national-herald-land-grab-case_942922.html |title=Court summons Sonia Gandhi, Rahul in National Herald land grab case |publisher=Zee News |date=26 June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/National-Herald-case-Delhi-HC-stays-criminal-proceedings-against-Sonia-Gandhi-Rahul-Gandhi/articleshow/39756755.cms |title=National Herald case: Delhi HC stays criminal proceedings against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi |publisher=Times of India |date=6 August 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/national-herald-case-relief-for-sonia-rahul-delhi-hc-stays-summons-till-august-13_952910.html |title=National Herald case: Relief for Sonia, Rahul, Delhi HC stays summons till August 13 |publisher=Zee News |date=6 August 2014}}</ref> with the court observing [[prima facie]] evidence against all the accused.<ref name="Zee News"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/report/national-herald-case-what-you-should-know/20151209.htm |title=National Herald case: What you should know |work=[[Rediff.com]] |date=9 December 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/national-herald-case-where-the-matter-stands/ |title=National Herald case explained: Everything you need to know |publisher=[[The Indian Express]] |date=10 December 2015}}</ref> on 1 August 2014 the [[Enforcement Directorate]] initiated probe to find any [[Money laundering#India|money laundering]] in the case<ref>{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/national-herald-case-trouble-for-sonia-rahul-as-ed-begins-preliminary-probe_951680.html |title=National Herald case: Trouble for Sonia, Rahul as ED begins preliminary probe |publisher=Zee News |date=1 August 2014}}</ref> while on the same day Swamy was served notice by the High Court.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/national-herald-case-delhi-high-court-serves-notice-to-subramanian-swamy-congress-sonia-gandhi-rahul-gandhi/1/375130.html |title=National Herald case: Delhi High Court serves notice to Subramanian Swamy |publisher=India Today |date=1 August 2014}}</ref> on 28 August the metropolitan court fixed 9 December for the next hearing of the case,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/national-herald-case-delhi-trial-court-to-hear-case-on-9-december-1686177.html |title=National Herald case: Delhi trial court to hear case on 9 December |publisher=First Post |date=28 August 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.oneindia.com/india/court-defers-hearing-in-national-herald-case-1510868.html |title=Court defers hearing in National Herald case |publisher=One India |date=28 August 2014}}</ref> while on 12 January 2015 the judge of the Delhi High Court recused himself from hearing the case stating that schedule of cases has been changed and directed that the petitions be directed before an appropriate bench.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/national-herald-case-judge-recuses-from-hearing-sonia-gandhi-rahul-gandhi-plea/ |title=National Herald case: Judge recuses from hearing Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi plea |publisher=The Indian Express |date=12 January 2015}}</ref> on 27 January 2015, the Supreme Court asked Swamy to make out a case for the speedy trial in the Delhi High Court since the petition cannot be heard directly.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/national-herald-case-sc-directs-subramanian-swamy-approach-delhi-hc-2067027.html |title=National Herald case: SC directs Subramanian Swamy to approach Delhi HC |publisher=First Post |date=27 January 2015}}</ref>
The hearing of the case had been taken up thereafter on different occasions<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.oneindia.com/2013/03/16/subramanian-swamy-s-victory-against-sonia-rahul-gandhi-1173225.html |title=Subramanian Swamy's victory against Sonia, Rahul Gandhi |publisher=One India |date=16 March 2013 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=21 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160821221121/http://www.oneindia.com/2013/03/16/subramanian-swamy-s-victory-against-sonia-rahul-gandhi-1173225.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/national-herald-acquisition-delhi-court-summons-roc-to-testify-records.html |title=National Herald Acquisition: Delhi Court Summons ROC to Testify Records |publisher=dailypioneer |date=29 April 2014 |access-date=30 April 2014 |archive-date=2 May 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140502010312/http://www.dailypioneer.com/nation/national-herald-acquisition-delhi-court-summons-roc-to-testify-records.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="Zee News">{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/court-summons-sonia-gandhi-rahul-in-national-herald-land-grab-case_942922.html |title=Court summons Sonia Gandhi, Rahul in National Herald land grab case |publisher=Zee News |date=26 June 2014 |access-date=26 June 2014 |archive-date=2 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150702195725/http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/court-summons-sonia-gandhi-rahul-in-national-herald-land-grab-case_942922.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/National-Herald-case-Delhi-HC-stays-criminal-proceedings-against-Sonia-Gandhi-Rahul-Gandhi/articleshow/39756755.cms |title=National Herald case: Delhi HC stays criminal proceedings against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi |publisher=Times of India |date=6 August 2014 |access-date=6 August 2014 |archive-date=17 September 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150917190210/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/National-Herald-case-Delhi-HC-stays-criminal-proceedings-against-Sonia-Gandhi-Rahul-Gandhi/articleshow/39756755.cms |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/national-herald-case-relief-for-sonia-rahul-delhi-hc-stays-summons-till-august-13_952910.html |title=National Herald case: Relief for Sonia, Rahul, Delhi HC stays summons till August 13 |publisher=Zee News |date=6 August 2014 |access-date=6 August 2014 |archive-date=8 August 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140808232354/http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/national-herald-case-relief-for-sonia-rahul-delhi-hc-stays-summons-till-august-13_952910.html |url-status=live }}</ref> with the court observing [[prima facie]] evidence against all the accused.<ref name="Zee News"/><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.rediff.com/news/report/national-herald-case-what-you-should-know/20151209.htm |title=National Herald case: What you should know |work=[[Rediff.com]] |date=9 December 2015 |access-date=23 December 2015 |archive-date=24 December 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151224154817/http://www.rediff.com/news/report/national-herald-case-what-you-should-know/20151209.htm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/national-herald-case-where-the-matter-stands/ |title=National Herald case explained: Everything you need to know |publisher=[[The Indian Express]] |date=10 December 2015 |access-date=8 December 2015 |archive-date=19 December 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151219084153/http://indianexpress.com/article/explained/national-herald-case-where-the-matter-stands/ |url-status=live }}</ref> on 1 August 2014 the [[Enforcement Directorate]] initiated probe to find any [[Money laundering#India|money laundering]] in the case<ref>{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/national-herald-case-trouble-for-sonia-rahul-as-ed-begins-preliminary-probe_951680.html |title=National Herald case: Trouble for Sonia, Rahul as ED begins preliminary probe |publisher=Zee News |date=1 August 2014 |access-date=1 August 2014 |archive-date=2 August 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140802104309/http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/national-herald-case-trouble-for-sonia-rahul-as-ed-begins-preliminary-probe_951680.html |url-status=live }}</ref> while on the same day Swamy was served notice by the High Court.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/national-herald-case-delhi-high-court-serves-notice-to-subramanian-swamy-congress-sonia-gandhi-rahul-gandhi/1/375130.html |title=National Herald case: Delhi High Court serves notice to Subramanian Swamy |publisher=India Today |date=1 August 2014 |access-date=1 August 2014 |archive-date=1 August 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140801134409/http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/national-herald-case-delhi-high-court-serves-notice-to-subramanian-swamy-congress-sonia-gandhi-rahul-gandhi/1/375130.html |url-status=live }}</ref> on 28 August the metropolitan court fixed 9 December for the next hearing of the case,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/national-herald-case-delhi-trial-court-to-hear-case-on-9-december-1686177.html |title=National Herald case: Delhi trial court to hear case on 9 December |publisher=First Post |date=28 August 2014 |access-date=30 August 2014 |archive-date=31 August 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140831164442/http://www.firstpost.com/politics/national-herald-case-delhi-trial-court-to-hear-case-on-9-december-1686177.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.oneindia.com/india/court-defers-hearing-in-national-herald-case-1510868.html |title=Court defers hearing in National Herald case |publisher=One India |date=28 August 2014 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=21 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160821203219/http://www.oneindia.com/india/court-defers-hearing-in-national-herald-case-1510868.html |url-status=live }}</ref> while on 12 January 2015 the judge of the Delhi High Court recused himself from hearing the case stating that schedule of cases has been changed and directed that the petitions be directed before an appropriate bench.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/national-herald-case-judge-recuses-from-hearing-sonia-gandhi-rahul-gandhi-plea/ |title=National Herald case: Judge recuses from hearing Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi plea |publisher=The Indian Express |date=12 January 2015 |access-date=24 January 2015 |archive-date=15 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150115074129/http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-others/national-herald-case-judge-recuses-from-hearing-sonia-gandhi-rahul-gandhi-plea/ |url-status=live }}</ref> on 27 January 2015, the Supreme Court asked Swamy to make out a case for the speedy trial in the Delhi High Court since the petition cannot be heard directly.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.firstpost.com/politics/national-herald-case-sc-directs-subramanian-swamy-approach-delhi-hc-2067027.html |title=National Herald case: SC directs Subramanian Swamy to approach Delhi HC |publisher=First Post |date=27 January 2015 |access-date=19 February 2015 |archive-date=30 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150130034454/http://www.firstpost.com/politics/national-herald-case-sc-directs-subramanian-swamy-approach-delhi-hc-2067027.html |url-status=live }}</ref>


On 18 September 2015 it was reported that the Enforcement Directorate had reopened the investigation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.news18.com/news/politics/enforcement-directorate-reopens-national-herald-case-involving-sonia-and-rahul-gandhi-which-was-closed-in-august-1102471.html |title=Enforcement Directorate reopens National Herald case involving Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, which was closed in August |publisher=IBN Live |date=18 September 2015}}</ref> Following it, on 19 December 2015 Patiala House Court granted unconditional bail immediately on the hearing to all the five accused but one.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/gandhis-get-bail-in-herald-case/article8008532.ece |title=Sonia, Rahul get bail, hit out at Modi |work=The Hindu |date=19 December 2015|last1=Kumar |first1=Nirnimesh |last2=Iqbal |first2=Mohammed |last3=Jeelani |first3=Mehboob }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://in.reuters.com/article/india-gandhis-sonia-rahul-congress-idINKBN0U208Z20151219 |title=Sonia, Rahul Gandhi get bail after rare court date over alleged fraud |publisher=Reuters India |date=19 December 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/live-national-herald-case-sonia-rahul-gandhi-to-appear-before-court-2157431 |title=National Herald case: Sonia, Rahul Gandhi immediately get bail; next hearing on February 20 |work=[[Daily News and Analysis]] |date=19 December 2015}}</ref> on 12 July 2016 the Delhi High Court set aside the trial court order of 11 January<ref>{{cite web |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/National-Herald-case-Relief-for-Congress/articleshow/53172103.cms |title=National Herald case: Relief for Congress |publisher=[[Times of India]] |date=12 July 2016}}</ref> and 11 March<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/national-herald-case-delhi-court-asks-for-balance-sheets-of-ajl-congress/ |title=National Herald case: Delhi Court asks for balance sheets of AJL, Congress |publisher=[[The Indian Express]] |date=12 March 2016}}</ref> based on plea by Swamy to examine balance sheets of Congress party, [[Associated Journals Ltd|AJL]] and Young Indian from 2010 to 2013,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://delhihighcourt.nic.in/writereaddata/upload/Announcements/AnnouncementFile_BE5FNPPV.PDF |title=J- 2 Pronouncement of Judgements (Applet. Jurisdiction), 1.CRL.M.C 671/2016, 2.CRL.M.C. 672/2016, 3.CRL.M.C. 1317/2016, 4.CRL.M.C.1319/2016, 5.CRL.M.C.1321/2016 |publisher=[[Delhi High Court]] |date=12 July 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/national-herald-case-congress-hopes-delhi-high-court-ruling-will-end-bjp-subramanian-swamys-celebrations-2910408/ |title=National Herald case: Congress hopes Delhi High Court ruling will end BJP, Subramanian Swamy's celebrations |publisher=[[The Indian Express]] |date=12 July 2016}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/why-is-congress-so-afraid-of-national-herald-papers-will-re-apply-for-same-subramanian-swamy_1908050.html |title=Why is Congress so afraid of National Herald papers? Will re-apply for documents: Subramanian Swamy |publisher=[[Zee News]] |date=17 July 2016}}</ref> and fixed the date of next hearing on 20 August.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/will-file-fresh-application-in-herald-case-swamy-to-court-116071600485_1.html |title=Will file fresh application in National Herald case: Subramanian Swamy to court |newspaper=Business Standard India |publisher=[[Business Standard]] |date=16 July 2016|agency=Press Trust of India }}</ref> Currently, the case proceedings are on-going in Delhi High Court.<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/i-have-no-documents-to-prove-that-rent-was-paid-to-young-india-152248 | title='I Have No Documents to Prove that Rent Was Paid to Young India': Subramanian Swamy Deposes in National Herald Case| date=February 2020}}</ref>
On 18 September 2015 it was reported that the Enforcement Directorate had reopened the investigation.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.news18.com/news/politics/enforcement-directorate-reopens-national-herald-case-involving-sonia-and-rahul-gandhi-which-was-closed-in-august-1102471.html |title=Enforcement Directorate reopens National Herald case involving Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, which was closed in August |publisher=IBN Live |date=18 September 2015 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=22 September 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160922172405/http://www.news18.com/news/politics/enforcement-directorate-reopens-national-herald-case-involving-sonia-and-rahul-gandhi-which-was-closed-in-august-1102471.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Following it, on 19 December 2015 Patiala House Court granted unconditional bail immediately on the hearing to all the five accused but one.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/gandhis-get-bail-in-herald-case/article8008532.ece |title=Sonia, Rahul get bail, hit out at Modi |work=The Hindu |date=19 December 2015 |last1=Kumar |first1=Nirnimesh |last2=Iqbal |first2=Mohammed |last3=Jeelani |first3=Mehboob |access-date=23 December 2015 |archive-date=12 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112235601/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/gandhis-get-bail-in-herald-case/article8008532.ece |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://in.reuters.com/article/india-gandhis-sonia-rahul-congress-idINKBN0U208Z20151219 |title=Sonia, Rahul Gandhi get bail after rare court date over alleged fraud |publisher=Reuters India |date=19 December 2015 |access-date=23 December 2015 |archive-date=24 December 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151224103801/http://in.reuters.com/article/india-gandhis-sonia-rahul-congress-idINKBN0U208Z20151219 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/live-national-herald-case-sonia-rahul-gandhi-to-appear-before-court-2157431 |title=National Herald case: Sonia, Rahul Gandhi immediately get bail; next hearing on February 20 |work=[[Daily News and Analysis]] |date=19 December 2015 |access-date=23 December 2015 |archive-date=22 December 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151222015927/http://www.dnaindia.com/india/live-national-herald-case-sonia-rahul-gandhi-to-appear-before-court-2157431 |url-status=live }}</ref> on 12 July 2016 the Delhi High Court set aside the trial court order of 11 January<ref>{{cite web |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/National-Herald-case-Relief-for-Congress/articleshow/53172103.cms |title=National Herald case: Relief for Congress |publisher=[[Times of India]] |date=12 July 2016 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=17 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160717171618/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/National-Herald-case-Relief-for-Congress/articleshow/53172103.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> and 11 March<ref>{{cite web |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/national-herald-case-delhi-court-asks-for-balance-sheets-of-ajl-congress/ |title=National Herald case: Delhi Court asks for balance sheets of AJL, Congress |publisher=[[The Indian Express]] |date=12 March 2016 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=7 July 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160707124825/http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/national-herald-case-delhi-court-asks-for-balance-sheets-of-ajl-congress/ |url-status=live }}</ref> based on plea by Swamy to examine balance sheets of Congress party, [[Associated Journals Ltd|AJL]] and Young Indian from 2010 to 2013,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://delhihighcourt.nic.in/writereaddata/upload/Announcements/AnnouncementFile_BE5FNPPV.PDF |title=J- 2 Pronouncement of Judgements (Applet. Jurisdiction), 1.CRL.M.C 671/2016, 2.CRL.M.C. 672/2016, 3.CRL.M.C. 1317/2016, 4.CRL.M.C.1319/2016, 5.CRL.M.C.1321/2016 |publisher=[[Delhi High Court]] |date=12 July 2016 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=16 September 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160916083151/http://delhihighcourt.nic.in/writereaddata/upload/Announcements/AnnouncementFile_BE5FNPPV.PDF |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/national-herald-case-congress-hopes-delhi-high-court-ruling-will-end-bjp-subramanian-swamys-celebrations-2910408/ |title=National Herald case: Congress hopes Delhi High Court ruling will end BJP, Subramanian Swamy's celebrations |publisher=[[The Indian Express]] |date=12 July 2016 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=18 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160818011313/http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/national-herald-case-congress-hopes-delhi-high-court-ruling-will-end-bjp-subramanian-swamys-celebrations-2910408/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/why-is-congress-so-afraid-of-national-herald-papers-will-re-apply-for-same-subramanian-swamy_1908050.html |title=Why is Congress so afraid of National Herald papers? Will re-apply for documents: Subramanian Swamy |publisher=[[Zee News]] |date=17 July 2016 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=19 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160819020234/http://zeenews.india.com/news/india/why-is-congress-so-afraid-of-national-herald-papers-will-re-apply-for-same-subramanian-swamy_1908050.html |url-status=live }}</ref> and fixed the date of next hearing on 20 August.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/will-file-fresh-application-in-herald-case-swamy-to-court-116071600485_1.html |title=Will file fresh application in National Herald case: Subramanian Swamy to court |newspaper=Business Standard India |publisher=[[Business Standard]] |date=16 July 2016 |agency=Press Trust of India |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=21 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160821071659/http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/will-file-fresh-application-in-herald-case-swamy-to-court-116071600485_1.html |url-status=live }}</ref> Currently, the case proceedings are on-going in Delhi High Court.<ref>{{Cite web| url=https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/i-have-no-documents-to-prove-that-rent-was-paid-to-young-india-152248| title='I Have No Documents to Prove that Rent Was Paid to Young India': Subramanian Swamy Deposes in National Herald Case| date=February 2020| access-date=3 February 2020| archive-date=3 February 2020| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200203065716/https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/i-have-no-documents-to-prove-that-rent-was-paid-to-young-india-152248| url-status=live}}</ref>


===Temple cases===
===Temple cases===
====Nataraja temple case====
====Nataraja temple case====


Swamy had filed a petition in the Supreme Court with priests of the [[Dikshitar]] sect challenging the decision of the [[Madras High Court]] on transferring the administration of the [[Thillai Nataraja Temple, Chidambaram|Nataraja temple]] to the then Tamil Nadu government in 2009.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ndtv.com/south/tamil-nadu-government-will-not-manage-famous-temple-rules-supreme-court-546936 |title=Tamil Nadu government will not manage famous temple, rules Supreme Court |author=J Sam Daniel Stalin |date=6 January 2014 |work=NDTV.com}}</ref>
Swamy had filed a petition in the Supreme Court with priests of the [[Dikshitar]] sect challenging the decision of the [[Madras High Court]] on transferring the administration of the [[Thillai Nataraja Temple, Chidambaram|Nataraja temple]] to the then Tamil Nadu government in 2009.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ndtv.com/south/tamil-nadu-government-will-not-manage-famous-temple-rules-supreme-court-546936 |title=Tamil Nadu government will not manage famous temple, rules Supreme Court |author=J Sam Daniel Stalin |date=6 January 2014 |work=NDTV.com |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=7 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160307033212/http://www.ndtv.com/south/tamil-nadu-government-will-not-manage-famous-temple-rules-supreme-court-546936 |url-status=live }}</ref>


Swamy on referring to the provisions of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, contended that [[Smarta Tradition|Podu Dikshitars]] have right to administer the temple<ref>{{cite web |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Nataraja-temple-to-be-managed-by-priest-not-by-Tamil-Nadu-govt/articleshow/28474693.cms |title=Nataraja temple to be managed by priest, not by Tamil Nadu govt |work=The Times of India}}</ref> and argued on handing over the administration on mismanagement grounds of temple's wealth is violation under Article 26 of the [[Constitution of India]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=41133 |title=Archived copy |access-date=9 March 2014 |archive-date=9 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140109044703/http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=41133 |url-status=dead }}</ref> on 6 January 2014 the Supreme Court ruled that the administration is to be handed over back to the priests of the temple from the state government.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/Nataraja-Temple-to-be-Managed-by-Priest-not-by-Tamil-Nadu-Government/2014/01/06/article1985968.ece#.UxyM0D-Syiw |title=Nataraja Temple to be Managed by Priest not by Tamil Nadu Government |work=The New Indian Express}}</ref>
Swamy on referring to the provisions of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, contended that [[Smarta Tradition|Podu Dikshitars]] have right to administer the temple<ref>{{cite news |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Nataraja-temple-to-be-managed-by-priest-not-by-Tamil-Nadu-govt/articleshow/28474693.cms |title=Nataraja temple to be managed by priest, not by Tamil Nadu govt |work=The Times of India |date=6 January 2014 |access-date=9 March 2014 |archive-date=12 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140912124248/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Nataraja-temple-to-be-managed-by-priest-not-by-Tamil-Nadu-govt/articleshow/28474693.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> and argued on handing over the administration on mismanagement grounds of temple's wealth is violation under Article 26 of the [[Constitution of India]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=41133 |title=Archived copy |access-date=9 March 2014 |archive-date=9 January 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140109044703/http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgs1.aspx?filename=41133 |url-status=dead }}</ref> on 6 January 2014 the Supreme Court ruled that the administration is to be handed over back to the priests of the temple from the state government.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/Nataraja-Temple-to-be-Managed-by-Priest-not-by-Tamil-Nadu-Government/2014/01/06/article1985968.ece#.UxyM0D-Syiw |title=Nataraja Temple to be Managed by Priest not by Tamil Nadu Government |work=The New Indian Express |access-date=9 March 2014 |archive-date=19 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160819033222/http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/Nataraja-Temple-to-be-Managed-by-Priest-not-by-Tamil-Nadu-Government/2014/01/06/article1985968.ece#.UxyM0D-Syiw |url-status=dead }}</ref>


====State control of Hindu temples====
====State control of Hindu temples====
Subramanian Swamy filed a petition to remove Kerala State government's control over Hindu temples by abolishing [[Devaswom boards in Kerala|Devaswom]]. in 2018, the Supreme Court agreed to examine the petition moved by him and TG Mohan Das to abolish Devaswom Board. The Supreme Court issued notice to the Kerala government and Devaswom Board of Travanacore and Cochin and sought their response in six weeks.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Supreme Court issues notice to Kerala on Devaswom Board|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2018/oct/13/supreme-court-issues-notice-to-kerala-on-devaswom-board-1884903.html|access-date=2020-11-07|work=The New Indian Express}}</ref> in 2019, the Kerala government opposed Subramanian Swamy's plea.<ref>{{Cite news|agency=Press Trust of India|date=2019-01-23|title=Kerala opposes Swamy's plea to make Devaswom boards free of state's control|work=Business Standard India|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/kerala-opposes-swamy-s-plea-to-make-devaswom-boards-free-of-state-s-control-119012301349_1.html|access-date=2020-11-07}}</ref>
Subramanian Swamy filed a petition to remove Kerala State government's control over Hindu temples by abolishing [[Devaswom boards in Kerala|Devaswom]]. in 2018, the Supreme Court agreed to examine the petition moved by him and TG Mohan Das to abolish Devaswom Board. The Supreme Court issued notice to the Kerala government and Devaswom Board of Travanacore and Cochin and sought their response in six weeks.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Supreme Court issues notice to Kerala on Devaswom Board|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2018/oct/13/supreme-court-issues-notice-to-kerala-on-devaswom-board-1884903.html|access-date=2020-11-07|work=The New Indian Express|date=13 October 2018 |archive-date=13 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201113172309/https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2018/oct/13/supreme-court-issues-notice-to-kerala-on-devaswom-board-1884903.html|url-status=live}}</ref> in 2019, the Kerala government opposed Subramanian Swamy's plea.<ref>{{Cite news|agency=Press Trust of India|date=2019-01-23|title=Kerala opposes Swamy's plea to make Devaswom boards free of state's control|work=Business Standard India|url=https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/kerala-opposes-swamy-s-plea-to-make-devaswom-boards-free-of-state-s-control-119012301349_1.html|access-date=2020-11-07|archive-date=8 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210308015400/https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/kerala-opposes-swamy-s-plea-to-make-devaswom-boards-free-of-state-s-control-119012301349_1.html|url-status=live}}</ref>


====Ayodhya temple case====
====Ayodhya temple case====
Line 177: Line 182:
{{Main|Ayodhya dispute}}
{{Main|Ayodhya dispute}}


On 22 February 2016, Swamy filed a petition in the Supreme Court allowing construction of [[Rama]] temple at the disputed site where [[Demolition of the Babri Masjid|Babri Masjid was demolished]] in 1992, and expediting the adjudication related to order of the Allahabad High Court on 30 September 2010,<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article8268416.ece |title=Allow 'rebuilding' of Ram temple, Swamy urges SC |work=The Hindu |date=23 February 2016|last1=Rajagopal |first1=Krishnadas }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/subramanian-swamy-moves-supreme-court-to-build-ram-temple-in-ayodhya/articleshow/51087635.cms |title=Subramanian Swamy moves Supreme Court to build Ram temple in Ayodhya |publisher=[[The Economic Times]] |date=23 February 2016}}</ref> petition was accepted on 26 February to be later heard by the court.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-allows-swamys-plea-to-rebuild-ram-temple-along-with-ramjanmabhoomi-appeals/article8285368.ece |title=SC agrees to hear plea to 'rebuild' Ram temple |work=The Hindu |date=26 February 2016|last1=Rajagopal |first1=Krishnadas }}</ref>
On 22 February 2016, Swamy filed a petition in the Supreme Court allowing construction of [[Rama]] temple at the disputed site where [[Demolition of the Babri Masjid|Babri Masjid was demolished]] in 1992, and expediting the adjudication related to order of the Allahabad High Court on 30 September 2010,<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article8268416.ece |title=Allow 'rebuilding' of Ram temple, Swamy urges SC |work=The Hindu |date=23 February 2016|last1=Rajagopal |first1=Krishnadas }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/subramanian-swamy-moves-supreme-court-to-build-ram-temple-in-ayodhya/articleshow/51087635.cms |title=Subramanian Swamy moves Supreme Court to build Ram temple in Ayodhya |publisher=[[The Economic Times]] |date=23 February 2016 |access-date=23 February 2016 |archive-date=25 February 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160225083506/http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/subramanian-swamy-moves-supreme-court-to-build-ram-temple-in-ayodhya/articleshow/51087635.cms |url-status=live }}</ref> petition was accepted on 26 February to be later heard by the court.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-allows-swamys-plea-to-rebuild-ram-temple-along-with-ramjanmabhoomi-appeals/article8285368.ece |title=SC agrees to hear plea to 'rebuild' Ram temple |work=The Hindu |date=26 February 2016 |last1=Rajagopal |first1=Krishnadas |access-date=27 February 2016 |archive-date=6 January 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170106154409/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-allows-swamys-plea-to-rebuild-ram-temple-along-with-ramjanmabhoomi-appeals/article8285368.ece |url-status=live }}</ref>


==== Uttarakhand Char Dham Devasthanam Management Act, 2019 ====
==== Uttarakhand Char Dham Devasthanam Management Act, 2019 ====
In February 2020, Subramanian Swamy filed a public interest litigation in [[Uttarakhand High Court]] against newly framed law to govern Char Dham and 51 other temples of the state.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|title=Subramanian Swamy files PIL opposing newly framed law to govern temples in Uttarakhand|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/feb/24/subramanian-swamy-files-pil-opposing-newly-framed-law-to-govern-temples-in-uttarakhand-2107876.html|access-date=2021-12-28|website=The New Indian Express}}</ref> Swamy in his PIL, requested the court to declare the Uttarakhand Char Dham Devasthanam Management Act, 2019 'unconstitutional' which was passed in the legislative assembly of Uttarakhand in December 2019.<ref name=":2" /> But the Uttarakhand High Court upheld the constitutionality of the ''Uttarakhand Char Dham Devasthanam Management Act, 2019'', dismissing the public interest litigation filed by Subramanian Swamy and ''Sri 5 Mandir Samiti Gangotri Dham and another.''<ref>{{Cite web|last=Emmanuel|first=Meera|title=Char Dham Devasthanam Management Act does not amount to interference in religious affairs: Uttarakhand HC upholds validity, reads down S. 22|url=https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/hc-upholds-validity-of-uttarakhand-char-dham-devasthanam-management-act-2019|access-date=2021-12-28|website=Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=Uttarakhand High Court judgement in a PIL filed by Subramanian Swamy and Sri 5 Mandir Samiti Gangotri Dham and another .|work=Live Law|url=https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/pdf_upload-378551.pdf}}</ref> However, the Court read down ''Section 22'' of the Act, which was about the acquisition of land for the Char Dham.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Uttarakhand High Court dismisses Subramanian Swamy's PIL Opposing Char Dham Law|work=New Indian Express|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/jul/22/uttarakhand-high-court-dismisses-subramanian-swamys-pil-opposing-char-dham-law-2172981.html}}</ref>
In February 2020, Subramanian Swamy filed a public interest litigation in [[Uttarakhand High Court]] against newly framed law to govern Char Dham and 51 other temples of the state.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|title=Subramanian Swamy files PIL opposing newly framed law to govern temples in Uttarakhand|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/feb/24/subramanian-swamy-files-pil-opposing-newly-framed-law-to-govern-temples-in-uttarakhand-2107876.html|access-date=2021-12-28|website=The New Indian Express|date=24 February 2020 |archive-date=30 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211130162353/https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/feb/24/subramanian-swamy-files-pil-opposing-newly-framed-law-to-govern-temples-in-uttarakhand-2107876.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Swamy in his PIL, requested the court to declare the Uttarakhand Char Dham Devasthanam Management Act, 2019 'unconstitutional' which was passed in the legislative assembly of Uttarakhand in December 2019.<ref name=":2" /> But the Uttarakhand High Court upheld the constitutionality of the ''Uttarakhand Char Dham Devasthanam Management Act, 2019'', dismissing the public interest litigation filed by Subramanian Swamy and ''Sri 5 Mandir Samiti Gangotri Dham and another.''<ref>{{Cite web|last=Emmanuel|first=Meera|title=Char Dham Devasthanam Management Act does not amount to interference in religious affairs: Uttarakhand HC upholds validity, reads down S. 22|url=https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/hc-upholds-validity-of-uttarakhand-char-dham-devasthanam-management-act-2019|access-date=2021-12-28|website=Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news|date=21 July 2020 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=Uttarakhand High Court judgement in a PIL filed by Subramanian Swamy and Sri 5 Mandir Samiti Gangotri Dham and another .|work=Live Law|url=https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/pdf_upload-378551.pdf|access-date=28 December 2021|archive-date=2 December 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211202064720/https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/pdf_upload-378551.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> However, the Court read down ''Section 22'' of the Act, which was about the acquisition of land for the Char Dham.<ref>{{Cite news|title=Uttarakhand High Court dismisses Subramanian Swamy's PIL Opposing Char Dham Law|work=New Indian Express|url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/jul/22/uttarakhand-high-court-dismisses-subramanian-swamys-pil-opposing-char-dham-law-2172981.html|access-date=28 December 2021|archive-date=28 December 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211228123749/https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2020/jul/22/uttarakhand-high-court-dismisses-subramanian-swamys-pil-opposing-char-dham-law-2172981.html|url-status=live}}</ref>


==Political positions==
==Political positions==
Line 188: Line 193:


==== Israel ====
==== Israel ====
In various speeches and articles, Swamy has expressed his admiration for, and solidarity with, the [[State of Israel]] and has credited its retaliatory capacity for its ability to survive as a nation in a hostile Arab environment. Swamy made pioneering efforts towards India's establishment of [[India–Israel relations|diplomatic relations with Israel]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/first-israel-visas-from-india-were-issued-from-this-mps-residence/articleshow/59438603.cms |title=First Israel visas in India were issued from this MP's residence|website=[[The Times of India]]}}</ref>
In various speeches and articles, Swamy has expressed his admiration for, and solidarity with, the [[State of Israel]] and has credited its retaliatory capacity for its ability to survive as a nation in a hostile Arab environment. Swamy made pioneering efforts towards India's establishment of [[India–Israel relations|diplomatic relations with Israel]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/first-israel-visas-from-india-were-issued-from-this-mps-residence/articleshow/59438603.cms|title=First Israel visas in India were issued from this MP's residence|website=[[The Times of India]]|date=4 July 2017 |access-date=4 July 2017|archive-date=8 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170708053615/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/first-israel-visas-from-india-were-issued-from-this-mps-residence/articleshow/59438603.cms|url-status=live}}</ref>


==== Sri Lanka and LTTE ====
==== Sri Lanka and LTTE ====
Swamy, on several occasions, has voiced support for the state of Sri Lanka in its role during [[Sri Lankan Civil War|Sri Lanka's protracted civil war with the LTTE]], for which he was criticised as "pro Lanka" by his political opponents domestically.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.news18.com/news/politics/india-shouldnt-support-resolution-against-lanka-swamy-454333.html |title=India shouldn't support resolution against Lanka: Swamy |work=IBNLive|date=10 March 2012 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Karunanidhi enacting drama, says Jayalalithaa on DMK pull-out from UPA|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/sri-lankan-tamils-issue-karunanidhi-enacting-drama-says-jayalalithaa-dmk-pull-out-from-upa/1/258563.html|website=India Today}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Yatawara|first=Dhaneshi|date=8 September 2013|title=Think as Sri Lankans first|url=http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2013/09/08/fea03.asp|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160506221510/http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2013/09/08/fea03.asp|archive-date=6 May 2016|access-date=25 July 2016|website=Sunday Observer|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/swamy-slams-dmk-chief-for-remarks-on-indo-sri-lankan-relations_793425.html |title=Swamy slams DMK chief for remarks on Indo-Sri Lankan relations |work=Zee News|date=13 August 2012 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/subramanian-swamy-attacked-by-lawyers-in-madras-hc/story-KiCd6SNSbJ9pIT8a3mW0QN.html |title=Subramanian Swamy attacked by lawyers in Madras HC |date=17 February 2009 |publisher=[[Hindustan Times]]}}</ref> in an interview given to ''[[The Sunday Leader]]'' newspaper, Swamy stated that the Indian government should attend the [[CHOGM]] meeting held in [[Colombo]] despite stiff opposition from Indian politicians in Tamil Nadu concerned for the welfare and human rights of Tamils in Sri Lanka, placing the onus on the LTTE for human rights violations during the Sri Lankan civil war,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thesundayleader.lk/2013/11/03/india-must-ignore-lttes-financial-orphans-dr-subramanium-swamy/ |title=India Must Ignore LTTE's Financial Orphans – Dr Subramanium Swamy }}</ref><ref>[https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/pm-may-skip-chogm-meet-due-to-opposition/article1-1148937.aspx PM may skip CHOGM meet due to opposition]. Hindustan Times. 8 November 2013. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111051031/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/pm-may-skip-chogm-meet-due-to-opposition/article1-1148937.aspx|date=11 November 2013}}</ref> he had favoured [[Mahinda Rajapaksa]] also during [[2015 Sri Lankan presidential election|Sri Lanka 2015 election]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/give-rajapaksa-bharat-ratna-for-wiping-out-ltte_757861.html |title=Give Rajapaksa Bharat Ratna for wiping out LTTE |publisher=Zee News |date=11 February 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tamil-activists-burn-Subramanian-Swamys-effigy-after-he-demands-Bharat-Ratna-for-Rajapaksa/articleshow/44899410.cms |title=Tamil activists burn Subramanian Swamy's effigy after he demands Bharat Ratna for Rajapaksa |publisher=Times of India |date=21 October 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.itnnews.lk/local-news/large-fraction-of-tamils-will-vote-for-president-rajapaksa-subramaniam-swamy/ |title=Large fraction of Tamils will vote for President Rajapaksa – Subramaniam Swamy |publisher=itnnews.lk |date=28 November 2014 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160823030745/http://www.itnnews.lk/local-news/large-fraction-of-tamils-will-vote-for-president-rajapaksa-subramaniam-swamy/ |archive-date=23 August 2016 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref>
Swamy, on several occasions, has voiced support for the state of Sri Lanka in its role during [[Sri Lankan Civil War|Sri Lanka's protracted civil war with the LTTE]], for which he was criticised as "pro Lanka" by his political opponents domestically.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.news18.com/news/politics/india-shouldnt-support-resolution-against-lanka-swamy-454333.html |title=India shouldn't support resolution against Lanka: Swamy |work=IBNLive |date=10 March 2012 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=22 September 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160922180942/http://www.news18.com/news/politics/india-shouldnt-support-resolution-against-lanka-swamy-454333.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Karunanidhi enacting drama, says Jayalalithaa on DMK pull-out from UPA|url=http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/sri-lankan-tamils-issue-karunanidhi-enacting-drama-says-jayalalithaa-dmk-pull-out-from-upa/1/258563.html|website=India Today|date=19 March 2013 |access-date=14 December 2013|archive-date=14 December 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131214190150/http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/sri-lankan-tamils-issue-karunanidhi-enacting-drama-says-jayalalithaa-dmk-pull-out-from-upa/1/258563.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Yatawara|first=Dhaneshi|date=8 September 2013|title=Think as Sri Lankans first|url=https://archives.sundayobserver.lk/2013/09/08/fea03.asp|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160506221510/http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2013/09/08/fea03.asp|archive-date=6 May 2016|access-date=25 July 2016|website=Sunday Observer|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/swamy-slams-dmk-chief-for-remarks-on-indo-sri-lankan-relations_793425.html |title=Swamy slams DMK chief for remarks on Indo-Sri Lankan relations |work=Zee News |date=13 August 2012 |access-date=18 December 2013 |archive-date=19 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131219052726/http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/swamy-slams-dmk-chief-for-remarks-on-indo-sri-lankan-relations_793425.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/subramanian-swamy-attacked-by-lawyers-in-madras-hc/story-KiCd6SNSbJ9pIT8a3mW0QN.html |title=Subramanian Swamy attacked by lawyers in Madras HC |date=17 February 2009 |publisher=[[Hindustan Times]] |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=17 September 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160917094432/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/subramanian-swamy-attacked-by-lawyers-in-madras-hc/story-KiCd6SNSbJ9pIT8a3mW0QN.html |url-status=live }}</ref> in an interview given to ''[[The Sunday Leader]]'' newspaper, Swamy stated that the Indian government should attend the [[CHOGM]] meeting held in [[Colombo]] despite stiff opposition from Indian politicians in Tamil Nadu concerned for the welfare and human rights of Tamils in Sri Lanka, placing the onus on the LTTE for human rights violations during the Sri Lankan civil war,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thesundayleader.lk/2013/11/03/india-must-ignore-lttes-financial-orphans-dr-subramanium-swamy/ |title=India Must Ignore LTTE's Financial Orphans – Dr Subramanium Swamy |access-date=14 December 2013 |archive-date=14 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131214192105/http://www.thesundayleader.lk/2013/11/03/india-must-ignore-lttes-financial-orphans-dr-subramanium-swamy/ |url-status=dead }}</ref><ref>[https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/pm-may-skip-chogm-meet-due-to-opposition/article1-1148937.aspx PM may skip CHOGM meet due to opposition]. Hindustan Times. 8 November 2013. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131111051031/http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/pm-may-skip-chogm-meet-due-to-opposition/article1-1148937.aspx|date=11 November 2013}}</ref> he had favoured [[Mahinda Rajapaksa]] also during [[2015 Sri Lankan presidential election|Sri Lanka 2015 election]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/give-rajapaksa-bharat-ratna-for-wiping-out-ltte_757861.html |title=Give Rajapaksa Bharat Ratna for wiping out LTTE |publisher=Zee News |date=11 February 2012 |access-date=27 October 2014 |archive-date=27 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141027194811/http://zeenews.india.com/news/nation/give-rajapaksa-bharat-ratna-for-wiping-out-ltte_757861.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tamil-activists-burn-Subramanian-Swamys-effigy-after-he-demands-Bharat-Ratna-for-Rajapaksa/articleshow/44899410.cms |title=Tamil activists burn Subramanian Swamy's effigy after he demands Bharat Ratna for Rajapaksa |publisher=Times of India |date=21 October 2014 |access-date=27 October 2014 |archive-date=27 October 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141027203914/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tamil-activists-burn-Subramanian-Swamys-effigy-after-he-demands-Bharat-Ratna-for-Rajapaksa/articleshow/44899410.cms |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.itnnews.lk/local-news/large-fraction-of-tamils-will-vote-for-president-rajapaksa-subramaniam-swamy/ |title=Large fraction of Tamils will vote for President Rajapaksa – Subramaniam Swamy |publisher=itnnews.lk |date=28 November 2014 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160823030745/http://www.itnnews.lk/local-news/large-fraction-of-tamils-will-vote-for-president-rajapaksa-subramaniam-swamy/ |archive-date=23 August 2016 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref>


==== United States ====
==== United States ====
Swamy is a strong supporter of former U.S. President [[Donald Trump]], endorsing Trump's presidential candidacy in 2016 and comparing Trump to himself.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-24/modi-s-bet-on-trump-of-india-signals-risks-to-his-reform-push |title=Modi's Bet on 'Trump of India' Signals Risks to Reform Push |work=[[Bloomberg News|Bloomberg]] |date=24 May 2016}}</ref>
Swamy is a strong supporter of former U.S. President [[Donald Trump]], endorsing Trump's presidential candidacy in 2016 and comparing Trump to himself.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-24/modi-s-bet-on-trump-of-india-signals-risks-to-his-reform-push |title=Modi's Bet on 'Trump of India' Signals Risks to Reform Push |work=[[Bloomberg News|Bloomberg]] |date=24 May 2016 |access-date=6 July 2018 |archive-date=8 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201108134835/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-24/modi-s-bet-on-trump-of-india-signals-risks-to-his-reform-push |url-status=live }}</ref>


After the [[Unite the Right rally|Charlottesville riots]] in August 2017, he posted a tweet urging Indians residing in the United States to "stand with Trump at this hour of his being hunted by cockeyed liberals & Left wing loonies on racism" and praised Trump for "having showed the hypocrites their place by telling it like it is."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.thequint.com/neon/social-buzz/subramanian-swamy-trolled-on-twitter|title=Subramanian Swamy Gets Trolled on Twitter|date=18 August 2017}}</ref>
After the [[Unite the Right rally|Charlottesville riots]] in August 2017, he posted a tweet urging Indians residing in the United States to "stand with Trump at this hour of his being hunted by cockeyed liberals & Left wing loonies on racism" and praised Trump for "having showed the hypocrites their place by telling it like it is."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.thequint.com/neon/social-buzz/subramanian-swamy-trolled-on-twitter|title=Subramanian Swamy Gets Trolled on Twitter|date=18 August 2017|access-date=6 July 2018|archive-date=7 July 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180707005852/https://www.thequint.com/neon/social-buzz/subramanian-swamy-trolled-on-twitter|url-status=live}}</ref>


Following criticism of Pakistan by Trump, Swamy called for closer relations between India and the United States.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.freepressjournal.in/india/after-us-president-trumps-anti-pak-tweet-subramanian-swamy-calls-for-stronger-india-us-relations/1197599|title=After US President Trump's anti-Pak tweet, Subramanian Swamy calls for stronger India-US relations}}</ref>
Following criticism of Pakistan by Trump, Swamy called for closer relations between India and the United States.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.freepressjournal.in/india/after-us-president-trumps-anti-pak-tweet-subramanian-swamy-calls-for-stronger-india-us-relations/1197599|title=After US President Trump's anti-Pak tweet, Subramanian Swamy calls for stronger India-US relations|access-date=6 July 2018|archive-date=7 July 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180707010054/http://www.freepressjournal.in/india/after-us-president-trumps-anti-pak-tweet-subramanian-swamy-calls-for-stronger-india-us-relations/1197599|url-status=live}}</ref>


===Domestic policy===
===Domestic policy===
==== Cow ====
==== Cow ====
In March 2017, he brought a privat member's bill to punish [[cow slaughter in India]] with [[capital punishment]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Subramanian Swamy brings bill seeking death penalty for cow slaughter |url=https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/subramanian-swamy-brings-bill-seeking-death-penalty-for-cow-slaughter/601348/ |access-date=26 July 2022 |work=Financialexpress |date=24 March 2017 |language=en}}</ref>
In March 2017, he brought a private member's bill to punish [[cow slaughter in India]] with [[capital punishment]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Subramanian Swamy brings bill seeking death penalty for cow slaughter |url=https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/subramanian-swamy-brings-bill-seeking-death-penalty-for-cow-slaughter/601348/ |access-date=26 July 2022 |work=Financialexpress |date=24 March 2017 |language=en |archive-date=26 July 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220726115104/https://www.financialexpress.com/india-news/subramanian-swamy-brings-bill-seeking-death-penalty-for-cow-slaughter/601348/ |url-status=live }}</ref>

==== LGBT rights ====
==== LGBT rights ====
In 2018, when the Indian Supreme Court [[Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India|decriminalized gay sexual acts]], Swamy criticised the ruling, saying "It could give rise to an increase in the number of HIV cases."<ref>{{Cite web|title='It Will Give Rise to HIV Cases': Subramanian Swamy Frowns at SC Verdict on Section 377|url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/it-will-give-rise-to-hiv-cases-gay-bars-bjps-subramanian-swamy-frowns-at-sc-verdict-on-sec-377-1869533.html|date=2018-09-06|website=News18|access-date=2020-05-16}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2018-09-06|title=Joy in India as gay sex becomes legal|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-45404904|access-date=2020-05-16}}</ref>
In 2018, when the Indian Supreme Court [[Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India|decriminalized gay sexual acts]], Swamy criticised the ruling, saying "It could give rise to an increase in the number of HIV cases."<ref>{{Cite web|title='It Will Give Rise to HIV Cases': Subramanian Swamy Frowns at SC Verdict on Section 377|url=https://www.news18.com/news/india/it-will-give-rise-to-hiv-cases-gay-bars-bjps-subramanian-swamy-frowns-at-sc-verdict-on-sec-377-1869533.html|date=2018-09-06|website=News18|access-date=2020-05-16|archive-date=26 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200726223901/https://www.news18.com/news/india/it-will-give-rise-to-hiv-cases-gay-bars-bjps-subramanian-swamy-frowns-at-sc-verdict-on-sec-377-1869533.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|date=2018-09-06|title=Joy in India as gay sex becomes legal|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-45404904|access-date=2020-05-16|archive-date=9 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201109042531/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-45404904|url-status=live}}</ref>


==== Kashmir ====
==== Kashmir ====
In September 2008, Swamy stridently retorted against the contentions of some Indian columnists who voiced their opinions in favor of "peacefully" surrendering Kashmir to Pakistan. He said,
In September 2008, Swamy stridently retorted against the contentions of some Indian columnists who voiced their opinions in favor of "peacefully" surrendering Kashmir to Pakistan(source?). He said,


:"I would say that the silent suffering majority of India wants none of this. The 'Kashmir issue,' in fact, can no more be solved by dialogue either with the Pakistanis or the Hurriyat, leave alone the constitutional impossibility of allowing it to secede. [...]Kashmir, in fact, is now our [[History of Kashmir|defining identity]]. It is a touchstone for our resolve to preserve our national integrity. The population of that State may be majority Muslim but the land and its history is predominantly Hindu. for our commitment to the survival of the ancient civilisation of India and the composite culture that secularists talk of, we have not only to win that coming inevitable war but also resolve never to part with Kashmir. [...]
:"I would say that the silent suffering majority of India wants none of this. The 'Kashmir issue,' in fact, can no more be solved by dialogue either with the Pakistanis or the Hurriyat, leave alone the constitutional impossibility of allowing it to secede. [...]Kashmir, in fact, is now our [[History of Kashmir|defining identity]]. It is a touchstone for our resolve to preserve our national integrity. The population of that State may be majority Muslim but the land and its history is predominantly Hindu. for our commitment to the survival of the ancient civilisation of India and the composite culture that secularists talk of, we have not only to win that coming inevitable war but also resolve never to part with Kashmir. [...]
Line 214: Line 220:


==== Tamil Nadu politics ====
==== Tamil Nadu politics ====
Swamy is well known for his critical views against the "Aryan versus Dravidian" politics of [[Periyar E. V. Ramasamy]], calling it as the theory forwarded by the British.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hindu.com/2011/06/18/stories/2011061862200200.htm |title=Tamil Nadu / Madurai News : "Caste not birth-based" |date=18 June 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130806095535/http://www.hindu.com/2011/06/18/stories/2011061862200200.htm |archive-date=6 August 2013 |work=[[The Hindu]] |df=dmy-all}}</ref> He has been a staunch opponent of the armed rebel group [[Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam]].<ref>{{cite news |agency=Press Trust of India |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Janata-Party-chief-Subramanian-Swamy-appears-before-tribunal-examining-LTTE-ban/articleshow/6828953.cms?referral=PM |title=Janata Party chief Subramanian Swamy appears before tribunal examining LTTE ban |work=The Times of India |date=28 October 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/ltte-part-of-the-problem-swamy/article1375090.ece |title=LTTE part of the problem: Swamy |work=The Hindu |date=13 November 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.epdpnews.com/articals_content.php?artiid=24&artiname=Subramanian%20Swamy%20addresses%20the%20Sri%20Lankan%20Diaspora%20in%20Toronto&ln=eng |title= << EPDP News >>|website=www.epdpnews.com |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120510114143/http://www.epdpnews.com/articals_content.php?artiid=24&artiname=Subramanian%20Swamy%20addresses%20the%20Sri%20Lankan%20Diaspora%20in%20Toronto&ln=eng |archive-date=10 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/article157835.ece |title=Swamy criticises Karuna's statement on refugees |work=The New Indian Express |date=16 May 2012}}</ref>
Swamy is well known for his critical views against the "Aryan versus Dravidian" politics of [[Periyar E. V. Ramasamy]], calling it as the theory forwarded by the British.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hindu.com/2011/06/18/stories/2011061862200200.htm |title=Tamil Nadu / Madurai News : "Caste not birth-based" |date=18 June 2011 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130806095535/http://www.hindu.com/2011/06/18/stories/2011061862200200.htm |archive-date=6 August 2013 |work=[[The Hindu]] |df=dmy-all}}</ref> He has been a staunch opponent of the armed rebel group [[Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam]].<ref>{{cite news |agency=Press Trust of India |url=http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Janata-Party-chief-Subramanian-Swamy-appears-before-tribunal-examining-LTTE-ban/articleshow/6828953.cms?referral=PM |title=Janata Party chief Subramanian Swamy appears before tribunal examining LTTE ban |work=The Times of India |date=28 October 2010 |access-date=13 August 2016 |archive-date=3 April 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150403003949/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Janata-Party-chief-Subramanian-Swamy-appears-before-tribunal-examining-LTTE-ban/articleshow/6828953.cms?referral=PM |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/ltte-part-of-the-problem-swamy/article1375090.ece |title=LTTE part of the problem: Swamy |work=The Hindu |date=13 November 2008 |access-date=23 July 2013 |archive-date=16 December 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131216191026/http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/ltte-part-of-the-problem-swamy/article1375090.ece |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.epdpnews.com/articals_content.php?artiid=24&artiname=Subramanian%20Swamy%20addresses%20the%20Sri%20Lankan%20Diaspora%20in%20Toronto&ln=eng |title= << EPDP News >>|website=www.epdpnews.com |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120510114143/http://www.epdpnews.com/articals_content.php?artiid=24&artiname=Subramanian%20Swamy%20addresses%20the%20Sri%20Lankan%20Diaspora%20in%20Toronto&ln=eng |archive-date=10 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/article157835.ece |title=Swamy criticises Karuna's statement on refugees |work=The New Indian Express |date=16 May 2012 |access-date=22 June 2014 |archive-date=12 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112235601/http://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/article157835.ece |url-status=dead }}</ref>
He also urged the Indian government not to support the US led resolution condemning [[Alleged war crimes during the final stages of the Sri Lankan Civil War|war crimes]] in the [[Sri Lankan Civil War]], citing it as one-sided and not in the interest of India.<ref>{{cite news |agency=Press Trust of India |url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-03-08/news/37561573_1_subramanian-swamy-unhrc-rajapaksa |title=Subramanian Swamy asks US to work with Sri Lanka on resolution at UNHRC |work=The Economic Times |date=8 March 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://channelone.co.in/India/india-should-not-support-resolution-against-sri-lanka--subramanian-swamy-839.html |title=India should not support resolution against Sri Lanka: Subramanian Swamy |publisher=Channel One |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131109124814/http://channelone.co.in/India/india-should-not-support-resolution-against-sri-lanka--subramanian-swamy-839.html |archive-date=9 November 2013}}</ref> Swamy moved the court and got the order restoring quota for [[Sri Lankan Tamil people|Sri Lankan Tamil]] refugees in colleges in the state.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/Higher-Education-Remains-a-Struggle-for-Refugees/2014/06/22/article2293215.ece |title=Higher Education Remains a Struggle for Refugees |work=The New Indian Express |date=22 June 2014}}</ref>
He also urged the Indian government not to support the US led resolution condemning [[Alleged war crimes during the final stages of the Sri Lankan Civil War|war crimes]] in the [[Sri Lankan Civil War]], citing it as one-sided and not in the interest of India.<ref>{{cite news |agency=Press Trust of India |url=http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-03-08/news/37561573_1_subramanian-swamy-unhrc-rajapaksa |title=Subramanian Swamy asks US to work with Sri Lanka on resolution at UNHRC |work=The Economic Times |date=8 March 2013 |access-date=13 May 2013 |archive-date=9 November 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131109124743/http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-03-08/news/37561573_1_subramanian-swamy-unhrc-rajapaksa |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://channelone.co.in/India/india-should-not-support-resolution-against-sri-lanka--subramanian-swamy-839.html |title=India should not support resolution against Sri Lanka: Subramanian Swamy |publisher=Channel One |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131109124814/http://channelone.co.in/India/india-should-not-support-resolution-against-sri-lanka--subramanian-swamy-839.html |archive-date=9 November 2013}}</ref> Swamy moved the court and got the order restoring quota for [[Sri Lankan Tamil people|Sri Lankan Tamil]] refugees in colleges in the state.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/Higher-Education-Remains-a-Struggle-for-Refugees/2014/06/22/article2293215.ece |title=Higher Education Remains a Struggle for Refugees |work=The New Indian Express |date=22 June 2014 |access-date=22 June 2014 |archive-date=5 September 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140905021841/http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/tamil_nadu/Higher-Education-Remains-a-Struggle-for-Refugees/2014/06/22/article2293215.ece |url-status=dead }}</ref>


Swamy obtained [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]] Stay against the implementation of [[Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project]] (SSCP). He believes that it would hurt the sentiments of people who believe that this shallow land connecting between [[Tamil Nadu]] and [[Sri Lanka]] was built by Lord [[Rama]]. He strongly opposes the implementation of SSCP citing that implementing this scheme will be a criminal offence under section 295 [[Indian Penal Code]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_ram-setu-project-is-illegal-arbitrary-and-unacceptable-subramanian-swamy_1804422 |title=Ram Setu project is illegal, arbitrary and unacceptable: Subramanian Swamy |agency=ANI |date=25 February 2013 |access-date=23 July 2013 |publisher=DNA}}</ref><ref>[http://www.indlaw.com/guest/DisplayNews.aspx?FCD913AA-4308-4C14-9B32-F8696B16303F Demolition of Ram Setu a criminal offence: Dr. Subramanian Swamy tells SC]. UNI. ''indlaw.com''. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140303155432/http://www.indlaw.com/guest/DisplayNews.aspx?FCD913AA-4308-4C14-9B32-F8696B16303F|date=3 March 2014}}</ref> He wrote letters to Prime Minister of India in June 2009 asking him to stop the project<ref>{{cite web |url=http://tamil.oneindia.com/news/2009/06/18/tn-hold-sethu-project-implementation-says-swamy.html |title=Hold Sethu project implementation, says Swamy, சேது.. 'ஹோல்ட் ஆன்': சாமி |publisher=OneIndia Tamil |language=ta |date=18 June 2009 |access-date=16 October 2011}}</ref> and had informed the Supreme Court on 14 October 2015 that the government may not continue with the [[Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project|Sethusamudram Project]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-decided-not-to-touch-ram-sethu-subramanian-swamy-tells-supreme-court/article7758406.ece |title=Govt. decided not to "touch" Ram Sethu, Swamy tells SC |work=The Hindu |date=14 October 2015}}</ref>
Swamy obtained [[Supreme Court of India|Supreme Court]] Stay against the implementation of [[Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project]] (SSCP). He believes that it would hurt the sentiments of people who believe that this shallow land connecting between [[Tamil Nadu]] and [[Sri Lanka]] was built by Lord [[Rama]]. He strongly opposes the implementation of SSCP citing that implementing this scheme will be a criminal offence under section 295 [[Indian Penal Code]].<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_ram-setu-project-is-illegal-arbitrary-and-unacceptable-subramanian-swamy_1804422 |title=Ram Setu project is illegal, arbitrary and unacceptable: Subramanian Swamy |agency=ANI |date=25 February 2013 |access-date=23 July 2013 |publisher=DNA |archive-date=28 February 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130228144541/http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_ram-setu-project-is-illegal-arbitrary-and-unacceptable-subramanian-swamy_1804422 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>[http://www.indlaw.com/guest/DisplayNews.aspx?FCD913AA-4308-4C14-9B32-F8696B16303F Demolition of Ram Setu a criminal offence: Dr. Subramanian Swamy tells SC]. UNI. ''indlaw.com''. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140303155432/http://www.indlaw.com/guest/DisplayNews.aspx?FCD913AA-4308-4C14-9B32-F8696B16303F|date=3 March 2014}}</ref> He wrote letters to Prime Minister of India in June 2009 asking him to stop the project<ref>{{cite web |url=http://tamil.oneindia.com/news/2009/06/18/tn-hold-sethu-project-implementation-says-swamy.html |title=Hold Sethu project implementation, says Swamy, சேது.. 'ஹோல்ட் ஆன்': சாமி |publisher=OneIndia Tamil |language=ta |date=18 June 2009 |access-date=16 October 2011 |archive-date=12 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112235602/http://tamil.oneindia.com/news/2009/06/18/tn-hold-sethu-project-implementation-says-swamy.html |url-status=live }}</ref> and had informed the Supreme Court on 14 October 2015 that the government may not continue with the [[Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project|Sethusamudram Project]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-decided-not-to-touch-ram-sethu-subramanian-swamy-tells-supreme-court/article7758406.ece |title=Govt. decided not to "touch" Ram Sethu, Swamy tells SC |work=The Hindu |date=14 October 2015 |access-date=14 October 2015 |archive-date=12 January 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160112235601/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/govt-decided-not-to-touch-ram-sethu-subramanian-swamy-tells-supreme-court/article7758406.ece |url-status=live }}</ref>


=== Hindu nationalism ===
=== Hindu nationalism ===
Swamy has made several statements in the past that reflect on his Hindu nationalist position.<ref name=":4" /><ref>{{Citation|last=Wojczewski|first=Thorsten|title=Conceptualizing the Links Between Populism, Nationalism and Foreign Policy: How Modi Constructed a Nationalist, Electoral Coalition in|date=2019|work=Populism and World Politics|pages=251–274|editor-last=Stengel|editor-first=Frank a.|publisher=Springer International Publishing|language=en|doi=10.1007/978-3-030-04621-7_10|isbn=978-3-030-04620-0|s2cid=159230600|editor2-last=MacDonald|editor2-first=David B.|editor3-last=Nabers|editor3-first=Dirk}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Sajjad|first=Muhammad Waqas|date=2018|title=Examining the State of Muslim Minority under Modi's BJP since 2014|journal=Strategic Studies|volume=38|issue=4|pages=19–36|doi=10.53532/ss.038.04.00130 |jstor=48544275|s2cid=248838817 |issn=1029-0990}}</ref> He has called for the creation of an "enlightened secular democracy which redresses all historical wrongs done to Hindus."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Anand, D.|title=Hindu nationalism in india and the politics of fear.|date=2016|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=978-1-349-37190-7|pages=89|oclc=951515192}}</ref> He has claimed that India is the world's most ancient civilization that consists of "an organic cultural core which is Hindu in character."<ref name=":5">{{Cite book|last=Wojczewski|first=Thorsten|title=India's foreign policy discourse and its conceptions of world order : the quest for power and identity|year=2018|isbn=978-1-138-29718-0|oclc=1050943305}}</ref> He has also claimed that the Hindu foundation of India is what makes India distinctive in the world.<ref name=":5" />
Swamy has made several statements in the past that reflect on his Hindu nationalist position.<ref name=":4" /><ref>{{Citation|last=Wojczewski|first=Thorsten|title=Conceptualizing the Links Between Populism, Nationalism and Foreign Policy: How Modi Constructed a Nationalist, Anti-establishment Electoral Coalition in India |date=2019|work=Populism and World Politics|pages=251–274|editor-last=Stengel|editor-first=Frank a.|publisher=Springer International Publishing|language=en|doi=10.1007/978-3-030-04621-7_10|isbn=978-3-030-04620-0|s2cid=159230600|editor2-last=MacDonald|editor2-first=David B.|editor3-last=Nabers|editor3-first=Dirk}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Sajjad|first=Muhammad Waqas|date=2018|title=Examining the State of Muslim Minority under Modi's BJP since 2014|journal=Strategic Studies|volume=38|issue=4|pages=19–36|doi=10.53532/ss.038.04.00130 |jstor=48544275|s2cid=248838817 |issn=1029-0990|doi-access=free}}</ref> He has called for the creation of an "enlightened secular democracy which redresses all historical wrongs done to Hindus."<ref>{{Cite book|last=Anand, D.|title=Hindu nationalism in india and the politics of fear.|date=2016|publisher=Palgrave Macmillan|isbn=978-1-349-37190-7|pages=89|oclc=951515192}}</ref> He has claimed that India is the world's most ancient civilization that consists of "an organic cultural core which is Hindu in character."<ref name=":5">{{Cite book|last=Wojczewski|first=Thorsten|title=India's foreign policy discourse and its conceptions of world order : the quest for power and identity|year=2018|publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-138-29718-0|oclc=1050943305}}</ref> He has also claimed that the Hindu foundation of India is what makes India distinctive in the world.<ref name=":5" />


=== Muslims ===
=== Muslims ===
After the [[2011 Mumbai bombings]], he wrote an controversial editorial wherein, as a response to Islamic terrorism,<ref>{{Cite web|title=Harvard Instructor May Face Removal Over Anti-Muslim Op-Ed|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/07/harvard-instructor-faces-removal-over-anti-muslim-op-ed/353487/|last=Sehgal|first=Ujala|date=2011-07-30|website=The Atlantic|language=en-US|access-date=2020-05-19}}</ref> he called for the removal of 300 mosques built at sites of Hindu temples.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Carmichael|first=Mary|date=2012-01-02|title=Pushed out of Harvard, professor returns fire|work=Boston.com|url=http://archive.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/01/02/harvard_summer_school_professor_dismissed_by_faculty_after_controversial_column_in_indian_paper_fires_back/|access-date=2020-05-19}}</ref> and for the disenfranchisement of Muslims unless they "acknowledge that their ancestors were Hindus".<ref>{{Cite book|last=|title=The democratic predicament : cultural diversity in Europe and India|date=14 March 2014|isbn=978-1-317-80942-5|editor-last=Tripathy|editor-first=Jyotirmaya|pages=xv|oclc=873805715|editor2-last=Padmanabhan|editor2-first=Sudarsan}}</ref><ref name=":0" /><ref name=":6">{{Cite web|last1=Jain|first1=Radhika|last2=Wu|first2=Kevin J.|date=December 7, 2011|title=Faculty Cancel Controversial Summer School Instructor's Courses, Debate Reaction to 'Occupy'|url=https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2011/12/7/faculty-final-meeting/|access-date=2020-05-16|website=|publisher=[[The Harvard Crimson]]}}</ref> After the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Harvard voted to have his classes removed for "demonising" Muslims, his regular Harvard summer teaching sessions were cancelled because of this article.<ref name=":7">{{Cite news|date=2011-12-08|title=Harvard drops Indian MP's courses|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-16081751|access-date=2020-05-16}}</ref><ref name=":0" />
After the [[2011 Mumbai bombings]], he wrote an controversial editorial wherein, as a response to Islamic terrorism,<ref>{{Cite web|title=Harvard Instructor May Face Removal Over Anti-Muslim Op-Ed|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/07/harvard-instructor-faces-removal-over-anti-muslim-op-ed/353487/|last=Sehgal|first=Ujala|date=2011-07-30|website=The Atlantic|language=en-US|access-date=2020-05-19|archive-date=6 May 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200506115417/https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/07/harvard-instructor-faces-removal-over-anti-muslim-op-ed/353487/|url-status=live}}</ref> he called for the removal of 300 mosques built at sites of Hindu temples.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Carmichael|first=Mary|date=2012-01-02|title=Pushed out of Harvard, professor returns fire|work=Boston.com|url=http://archive.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/01/02/harvard_summer_school_professor_dismissed_by_faculty_after_controversial_column_in_indian_paper_fires_back/|access-date=2020-05-19|archive-date=11 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111234101/http://archive.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2012/01/02/harvard_summer_school_professor_dismissed_by_faculty_after_controversial_column_in_indian_paper_fires_back/|url-status=live}}</ref> and for the disenfranchisement of Muslims unless they "acknowledge that their ancestors were Hindus".<ref>{{Cite book|last=|title=The democratic predicament : cultural diversity in Europe and India|date=14 March 2014|isbn=978-1-317-80942-5|editor-last=Tripathy|editor-first=Jyotirmaya|pages=xv|publisher=Routledge |oclc=873805715|editor2-last=Padmanabhan|editor2-first=Sudarsan}}</ref><ref name=":0" /><ref name=":6">{{Cite web|last1=Jain|first1=Radhika|last2=Wu|first2=Kevin J.|date=December 7, 2011|title=Faculty Cancel Controversial Summer School Instructor's Courses, Debate Reaction to 'Occupy'|url=https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2011/12/7/faculty-final-meeting/|access-date=2020-05-16|website=|publisher=[[The Harvard Crimson]]|archive-date=29 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200729223720/https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2011/12/7/faculty-final-meeting/|url-status=live}}</ref> After the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Harvard voted to have his classes removed for "demonising" Muslims, his regular Harvard summer teaching sessions were cancelled because of this article.<ref name=":7">{{Cite news|date=2011-12-08|title=Harvard drops Indian MP's courses|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-16081751|access-date=2020-05-16|archive-date=6 June 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200606114315/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-16081751|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":0" />


In a 2020 ''[[Vice Media|Vice]]'' interview, he stated that under the [[Constitution of India|Indian constitution]], "Article 14 guarantees equality of equals" and that "there is no such thing as equal rights, they [Muslim immigrants] are not in an equal category." He added, "We know that where the Muslim population is large, there is always trouble."<ref>{{Cite web|date=2 June 2020|title=After UN official, Subramanian Swamy warns of suing BBC HARDtalk|url=https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2020/06/02/after-un-official-subramanian-swamy-warns-of-suing-bbc-hardtalk.html|access-date=2021-05-10|website=The Week|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=India Burning (Clip) {{!}} VICE on SHOWTIME - YouTube|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCyBL8dBOEo|access-date=2021-01-15|website=www.youtube.com}}</ref> He later claimed that this had been misinterpreted in a tweet stating, "One fake quote is that I had declared Muslims are not equal to Hindus under Art. 14."<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=2021-01-16|title=Subramanian Swamy claims he never said 'Muslims are not equal to Hindus under Art 14'|url=https://twitter.com/Swamy39/status/1251039107108597760|access-date=|website=}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Subramanian Swamy claims he never said 'Muslims are not equal to Hindus under Art 14'; Twitter brings up earlier interview|url=https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/subramanian-swamy-claims-he-never-said-muslims-are-not-equal-to-hindus-under-art-14-twitter-brings-up-earlier-interview|access-date=2021-01-15|website=Free Press Journal|language=en}}</ref>
In a 2020 ''[[Vice Media|Vice]]'' interview, he stated that under the [[Constitution of India|Indian constitution]], "Article 14 guarantees equality of equals" and that "there is no such thing as equal rights, they [Muslim immigrants] are not in an equal category." He added, "We know that where the Muslim population is large, there is always trouble."<ref>{{Cite web|date=2 June 2020|title=After UN official, Subramanian Swamy warns of suing BBC HARDtalk|url=https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2020/06/02/after-un-official-subramanian-swamy-warns-of-suing-bbc-hardtalk.html|access-date=2021-05-10|website=The Week|language=en|archive-date=10 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210510131650/https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2020/06/02/after-un-official-subramanian-swamy-warns-of-suing-bbc-hardtalk.html|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=India Burning (Clip) {{!}} VICE on SHOWTIME - YouTube|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCyBL8dBOEo|access-date=2021-01-15|website=www.youtube.com|archive-date=23 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210123165820/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCyBL8dBOEo|url-status=live}}</ref> He later claimed that this had been misinterpreted in a tweet stating, "One fake quote is that I had declared Muslims are not equal to Hindus under Art. 14."<ref>{{Cite web|last=|first=|date=2021-01-16|title=Subramanian Swamy claims he never said 'Muslims are not equal to Hindus under Art 14'|url=https://twitter.com/Swamy39/status/1251039107108597760|access-date=|website=|archive-date=25 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210125132251/https://twitter.com/Swamy39/status/1251039107108597760|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Subramanian Swamy claims he never said 'Muslims are not equal to Hindus under Art 14'; Twitter brings up earlier interview|url=https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/subramanian-swamy-claims-he-never-said-muslims-are-not-equal-to-hindus-under-art-14-twitter-brings-up-earlier-interview|access-date=2021-01-15|website=Free Press Journal|language=en|archive-date=21 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210121015912/https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/subramanian-swamy-claims-he-never-said-muslims-are-not-equal-to-hindus-under-art-14-twitter-brings-up-earlier-interview|url-status=live}}</ref>


=== Conspiracy theory ===
=== Conspiracy theory ===


In September 2020, Swamy said that India's [[Central Bureau of Investigation]] (CBI), [[Enforcement Directorate]] (ED), and [[Narcotics Control Bureau]] (NCB) had "unearthed huge evidence" to prove in court that [[Bollywood]] actor [[Sushant Singh Rajput]]'s death was "murder by conspiracy."<ref name="Major Evidence">{{cite web|url=https://www.india.com/entertainment/sushant-singh-rajput-death-case-subramanian-swamy-claims-trimurti-agencies-unearthed-major-evidence-to-prove-murder-by-conspiracy-4139683/ |title=Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case: Subramanian Swamy Claims 'Trimurti Agencies Unearthed Major Evidence To Prove Murder By Conspiracy' |publisher=India.com |date=12 September 2020 |access-date=4 January 2021}}</ref> Swamy also said there had been "systematic destruction" of evidence in the case.<ref name="Major Evidence"/> Two weeks before, Swamy had said the [[Mumbai Police]] were "complicit" in the murder, that [[Dubai]] was "involved," and that "the Bollywood Cartel remains to be identified and made as 'accessory before the murder'."<ref name="Sushant was murdered">{{cite web|url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/sushant-was-murdered-subramanian-swamy-says-demand-for-cbi-probe-vindicated-1715277-2020-08-26 |title=Sushant was murdered: Subramanian Swamy says demand for CBI probe vindicated |publisher=[[India Today (TV channel)|India Today]] |date=26 August 2020 |access-date=4 January 2021}}</ref> in October 2020, after a medical board from the [[All India Institute of Medical Sciences]] (AIIMS) ruled out murder, stating that the actor died by suicide, a team of scientists associated with [[Microsoft India|Microsoft Research, India]] released an independent report, "Anatomy of a Rumour: Social media and the suicide of Sushant Singh Rajput." They wrote, "Perhaps the most interesting case is that of sitting parliamentarian Subramanian Swamy, once a central player in the policy circles, now wilfully [<nowiki/>[[sic]]] mongering deceit, and also the most popular Twitter handle in wordclouds [<nowiki/>[[sic]]] of trolls."<ref name="Murder narrative">{{cite web|url=https://www.theweek.in/news/entertainment/2020/10/04/study-shows-bjp-played-a-major-role-in-proposing-murder-narrative-in-sushant-death-case.html |title=Study shows BJP played a major role in proposing 'murder' narrative in Sushant's death case |work=[[The Week (Indian magazine)|The Week]] |date=4 October 2020 |access-date=4 January 2021}}</ref> In December 2020, after more than four months of investigation, the CBI sent Swamy a 3-page letter stating it was looking into all aspects of the case "in a thorough and professional manner using latest scientific techniques," and that "no aspect has been ruled out," but making no mention of Swamy's conspiracy theories.<ref name="No Aspect Ruled Out">{{cite web|url=https://www.thequint.com/entertainment/celebrities/no-aspect-ruled-out-till-date-says-cbi-on-sushant-singh-rajput-case |title=No Aspect Ruled Out Till Date: CBI on Sushant Singh Rajput Case |work=[[The Quint]] |date=30 December 2020 |access-date=4 January 2021}}</ref>
In September 2020, Swamy said that India's [[Central Bureau of Investigation]] (CBI), [[Enforcement Directorate]] (ED), and [[Narcotics Control Bureau]] (NCB) had "unearthed huge evidence" to prove in court that [[Bollywood]] actor [[Sushant Singh Rajput]]'s death was "murder by conspiracy."<ref name="Major Evidence">{{cite web |url=https://www.india.com/entertainment/sushant-singh-rajput-death-case-subramanian-swamy-claims-trimurti-agencies-unearthed-major-evidence-to-prove-murder-by-conspiracy-4139683/ |title=Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case: Subramanian Swamy Claims 'Trimurti Agencies Unearthed Major Evidence To Prove Murder By Conspiracy' |publisher=India.com |date=12 September 2020 |access-date=4 January 2021 |archive-date=20 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200920154704/https://www.india.com/entertainment/sushant-singh-rajput-death-case-subramanian-swamy-claims-trimurti-agencies-unearthed-major-evidence-to-prove-murder-by-conspiracy-4139683/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Swamy also said there had been "systematic destruction" of evidence in the case.<ref name="Major Evidence"/> Two weeks before, Swamy had said the [[Mumbai Police]] were "complicit" in the murder, that [[Dubai]] was "involved," and that "the Bollywood Cartel remains to be identified and made as 'accessory before the murder'."<ref name="Sushant was murdered">{{cite web |url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/sushant-was-murdered-subramanian-swamy-says-demand-for-cbi-probe-vindicated-1715277-2020-08-26 |title=Sushant was murdered: Subramanian Swamy says demand for CBI probe vindicated |publisher=[[India Today (TV channel)|India Today]] |date=26 August 2020 |access-date=4 January 2021 |archive-date=2 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201002084141/https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/sushant-was-murdered-subramanian-swamy-says-demand-for-cbi-probe-vindicated-1715277-2020-08-26 |url-status=live }}</ref> in October 2020, after a medical board from the [[All India Institute of Medical Sciences]] (AIIMS) ruled out murder, stating that the actor died by suicide, a team of scientists associated with [[Microsoft India|Microsoft Research, India]] released an independent report, "Anatomy of a Rumour: Social media and the suicide of Sushant Singh Rajput." They wrote, "Perhaps the most interesting case is that of sitting parliamentarian Subramanian Swamy, once a central player in the policy circles, now wilfully [<nowiki/>[[sic]]] mongering deceit, and also the most popular Twitter handle in wordclouds [<nowiki/>[[sic]]] of trolls."<ref name="Murder narrative">{{cite web |url=https://www.theweek.in/news/entertainment/2020/10/04/study-shows-bjp-played-a-major-role-in-proposing-murder-narrative-in-sushant-death-case.html |title=Study shows BJP played a major role in proposing 'murder' narrative in Sushant's death case |work=[[The Week (Indian magazine)|The Week]] |date=4 October 2020 |access-date=4 January 2021 |archive-date=26 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201126212902/https://www.theweek.in/news/entertainment/2020/10/04/study-shows-bjp-played-a-major-role-in-proposing-murder-narrative-in-sushant-death-case.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In December 2020, after more than four months of investigation, the CBI sent Swamy a 3-page letter stating it was looking into all aspects of the case "in a thorough and professional manner using latest scientific techniques," and that "no aspect has been ruled out," but making no mention of Swamy's conspiracy theories.<ref name="No Aspect Ruled Out">{{cite web |url=https://www.thequint.com/entertainment/celebrities/no-aspect-ruled-out-till-date-says-cbi-on-sushant-singh-rajput-case |title=No Aspect Ruled Out Till Date: CBI on Sushant Singh Rajput Case |work=[[The Quint]] |date=30 December 2020 |access-date=4 January 2021 |archive-date=7 January 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210107152414/https://www.thequint.com/entertainment/celebrities/no-aspect-ruled-out-till-date-says-cbi-on-sushant-singh-rajput-case |url-status=live }}</ref>


==Honours and awards==
==Honours and awards==
Line 239: Line 245:
| Distinguished Alumni Award.
| Distinguished Alumni Award.
| [[Hindu College, University of Delhi]].
| [[Hindu College, University of Delhi]].
|<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2799252.ece |title=It's time silent majority spoke up, says Vinod Rai |work=The Hindu |access-date=22 June 2012 |location=Chennai, India |date=14 January 2012}}</ref>
|<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2799252.ece |title=It's time silent majority spoke up, says Vinod Rai |work=The Hindu |access-date=22 June 2012 |location=Chennai, India |date=14 January 2012 |archive-date=24 August 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120824174537/http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2799252.ece |url-status=live }}</ref>
|-
|-
| 2016
| 2016
| Tamil Ratna
| Tamil Ratna
| America Tamil Sangam
| America Tamil Sangam
|<ref>[http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/subramanian-swamy-awarded-tamil-ratna-in-united-states/ Subramanian Swamy awarded ‘Tamil Ratna’ in United States]</ref>
|<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/subramanian-swamy-awarded-tamil-ratna-in-united-states/ |title=Subramanian Swamy awarded 'Tamil Ratna' in United States |date=11 September 2016 |access-date=25 February 2017 |archive-date=25 February 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170225210739/http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/subramanian-swamy-awarded-tamil-ratna-in-united-states/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
|}
|}


==Books, research papers and journals==
==Books, research papers and journals==
Swamy is the author of several books, research papers and journals. a complete list of papers, books and journals authored by him is given below. He has also co-authored with [[Paul Samuelson]], a paper on the Theory of Index Numbers (American Economic Review, 1974) and another in the Royal Economic Society's Economic Journal (1984).<ref name="Swamy Samuelson"/>
Swamy is the author of several books, research papers and journals. A complete list of papers, books and journals authored by him is given below. He has also co-authored with [[Paul Samuelson]], a paper on the Theory of Index Numbers (American Economic Review, 1974) and another in the Royal Economic Society's Economic Journal (1984).<ref name="Swamy Samuelson"/>


===Books===
===Books===
Line 272: Line 278:
* {{cite journal |last1=Swamy |first1=Subramanian |title=Predictions and Meditations |journal=India International Centre Quarterly |date=2009 |volume=36 |issue=3/4 |pages=202–222 |jstor=23006413 }}
* {{cite journal |last1=Swamy |first1=Subramanian |title=Predictions and Meditations |journal=India International Centre Quarterly |date=2009 |volume=36 |issue=3/4 |pages=202–222 |jstor=23006413 }}
* ''[https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/38589813-the-ideology-of-india-s-modern-right The Ideology of India’s Modern Right]'' (Publisher: Har Anand Publications; {{ISBN| 978-8124118924}})
* ''[https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/38589813-the-ideology-of-india-s-modern-right The Ideology of India’s Modern Right]'' (Publisher: Har Anand Publications; {{ISBN| 978-8124118924}})
* ''[https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/48070396-reset RESET: Regaining India’s Economic Legacy]'' (Publisher: Rupa Publications; {{ISBN|978-93-5333-651-6}}) RESET was top selling new [[E-book|eBook]] of 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/books-and-literature/ebooks-which-sold-most-this-amish-tripathi-devdutt-pattanaik-year-amazon-6191464/|title=The year that was: eBooks which sold most this year|date=2019-12-31|website=The Indian Express|language=en-US|access-date=2020-01-01}}</ref>
* ''[https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/48070396-reset RESET: Regaining India’s Economic Legacy]'' (Publisher: Rupa Publications; {{ISBN|978-93-5333-651-6}}) RESET was top selling new [[E-book|eBook]] of 2019.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://indianexpress.com/article/books-and-literature/ebooks-which-sold-most-this-amish-tripathi-devdutt-pattanaik-year-amazon-6191464/|title=The year that was: eBooks which sold most this year|date=2019-12-31|website=The Indian Express|language=en-US|access-date=2020-01-01|archive-date=31 December 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191231143340/https://indianexpress.com/article/books-and-literature/ebooks-which-sold-most-this-amish-tripathi-devdutt-pattanaik-year-amazon-6191464/|url-status=live}}</ref>
*''Himalayan Challenge: India, China and the Quest for Peace'' (Publisher: Rupa Publications India; {{ISBN|978-93-90356-19-5}})<ref>{{cite web |title=Himalayan Challenge: India, China and the quest for Peace |url=https://rupapublications.co.in/books/himalayan-challenge-india-china-and-the-quest-for-peace/ |website=Rupa Publications India |access-date=23 December 2020}}</ref>
*''Himalayan Challenge: India, China and the Quest for Peace'' (Publisher: Rupa Publications India; {{ISBN|978-93-90356-19-5}})<ref>{{cite web |title=Himalayan Challenge: India, China and the quest for Peace |url=https://rupapublications.co.in/books/himalayan-challenge-india-china-and-the-quest-for-peace/ |website=Rupa Publications India |access-date=23 December 2020 |archive-date=22 December 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201222165617/http://rupapublications.co.in/books/himalayan-challenge-india-china-and-the-quest-for-peace/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
*''The Hindu Manifesto for India's Democracy'' (Publisher: Har Anand Publications; {{ISBN|978-9391504489}})<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Hindu Manifesto for India's Democracy - Book Online, Har Anand Publications|url=http://www.haranandbooks.com/book/the-hindu-manifesto-for-indias-democracy/788.html|access-date=2022-02-07|website=www.haranandbooks.com}}</ref>
*''The Hindu Manifesto for India's Democracy'' (Publisher: Har Anand Publications; {{ISBN|978-9391504489}})<ref>{{Cite web|title=The Hindu Manifesto for India's Democracy - Book Online, Har Anand Publications|url=http://www.haranandbooks.com/book/the-hindu-manifesto-for-indias-democracy/788.html|access-date=2022-02-07|website=www.haranandbooks.com|archive-date=7 February 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220207063149/http://www.haranandbooks.com/book/the-hindu-manifesto-for-indias-democracy/788.html|url-status=live}}</ref>


===Articles===
===Articles===
Line 317: Line 323:
[[Category:Janata Party politicians]]
[[Category:Janata Party politicians]]
[[Category:Politicians from Chennai]]
[[Category:Politicians from Chennai]]
[[Category:Indian conspiracy theorists]]
[[Category:Indian Hindus]]
[[Category:Indian Hindus]]
[[Category:20th-century Indian economists]]
[[Category:20th-century Indian economists]]
[[Category:Tamil Nadu politicians]]
[[Category:India MPs 1977–1979]]
[[Category:India MPs 1977–1979]]
[[Category:India MPs 1980–1984]]
[[Category:India MPs 1980–1984]]
Line 333: Line 339:
[[Category:India MPs 1998–1999]]
[[Category:India MPs 1998–1999]]
[[Category:Lok Sabha members from Tamil Nadu]]
[[Category:Lok Sabha members from Tamil Nadu]]
[[Category:Union Ministers from Tamil Nadu]]
[[Category:Union ministers from Tamil Nadu]]
[[Category:Members of the Planning Commission of India]]
[[Category:Members of the Planning Commission of India]]
[[Category:Indian anti-corruption activists]]
[[Category:Indian anti-corruption activists]]
[[Category:Rajya Sabha members from Uttar Pradesh]]
[[Category:Rajya Sabha members from Uttar Pradesh]]
[[Category:Far-right politicians in India]]
[[Category:Indian far-right politicians]]
[[Category:Indian exiles]]
[[Category:Indian exiles]]
[[Category:Indian expatriates in the United States]]
[[Category:Indian expatriates in the United States]]
[[Category:Nominated members of the Rajya Sabha]]
[[Category:Nominated members of the Rajya Sabha]]
[[Category:Scientists from Chennai]]
[[Category:Politicians from Mumbai]]
[[Category:Politicians from Mumbai]]
[[Category:United Nations officials]]
[[Category:United Nations officials]]
[[Category:Law Ministers of India]]
[[Category:Law ministers of India]]
[[Category:Commerce and Industry Ministers of India]]
[[Category:Commerce and Industry Ministers of India]]
[[Category:Lok Dal politicians]]

Revision as of 21:32, 9 May 2024

Subramanian Swamy
Swamy in 2019
Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha
In office
26 April 2016 – 24 April 2022
ConstituencyNominated
In office
1988–1994
ConstituencyUttar Pradesh
In office
1974–1976
ConstituencyUttar Pradesh
Minister of Commerce and Industry
In office
10 November 1990 – 21 June 1991
Prime MinisterChandra Shekhar
Minister of Law and Justice
In office
10 November 1990 – 21 June 1991
Prime MinisterChandra Shekhar
Preceded byDinesh Goswami
Succeeded byKotla Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy
Member of Parliament, Lok Sabha
In office
1998–1999
Preceded byA. G. S. Ram Babu
Succeeded byP. Mohan
ConstituencyMadurai
In office
1977–1984
Preceded byRajaram Gopal Kulkarni
Succeeded byGurudas Kamat
ConstituencyMumbai North East
President, Janata Party
In office
1990–2013
Personal details
Born (1939-09-15) 15 September 1939 (age 85)
Mylapore, Madras Presidency, British India
(present-day Tamil Nadu, India)
Political partyBharatiya Janata Party (2013–present)
Other political
affiliations
Bharatiya Jana Sangh (1974–1977)
Janata Party (1977–2003 ; 2003-2013)
All India Progressive Janata Dal (2003)
Spouse
Roxna Swamy
(m. 1966)
Children
  • Gitanjali Swamy
  • Suhasini Haidar
Alma materUniversity of Delhi (BA)
Indian Statistical Institute (MA)
Harvard University (PhD)
OccupationPolitician, economist, statistician
WebsiteOfficial Blog

Subramanian Swamy (born 15 September 1939) is an Indian politician, economist and conspiracy theorist.[1][2] Before joining politics, he was a professor of Mathematical Economics at the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.[3] He is known for his Hindu nationalist views.[4] Swamy was a member of the Planning Commission of India and was a Cabinet Minister in the Chandra Shekhar government. Between 1994 and 1996, Swamy was Chairman of the Commission on Labour Standards and International Trade under former Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao. Swamy was a long-time member of the Janata Party, serving as its president until 2013 when he joined the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).[5] He has written on foreign affairs of India dealing largely with China, Pakistan and Israel. He was nominated to Rajya Sabha on 26 April 2016 for a six-year term, ending on 24 April 2022.

Family and education

Subramanian Swamy was born on 15 September 1939, in Mylapore, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, to a family which hailed originally from Madurai in Tamil Nadu in a Tamil Brahmin family.[6][7][8] His father, Sitaraman Subramanian, was a bureaucrat and his mother, Padmavathi, was a homemaker. He has one younger brother, Ram Subramanian, as well as two younger sisters.[9]

Sitaraman Subramanian was an officer in the Indian Statistical Service who served as the director of the Central Statistical Institute in Delhi, and was a statistical adviser to the Government of India.[10] The family, which hailed from Madurai in Tamil Nadu, moved to New Delhi when Swamy was only six months old. Due to his father's job and the family's Tamil roots, major national leaders like K. Kamaraj, C. Rajagopalachari and S. Satyamurti often visited Sitaraman.[11][12][13]

Education

He attended Hindu College, University of Delhi, from where he earned his bachelor's degree in Mathematics. He then took his master's degree in Statistics from the Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata. He was later recommended by Hendrik S. Houthakker[12] and went to study at Harvard University on a full Rockefeller scholarship,[12] where he received his PhD in Economics in 1965, with his thesis titled Economic Growth and Income Distribution in a Developing Nation.[14] His thesis adviser was Nobel laureate Simon Kuznets.[12][15] While he was a doctoral student at Harvard, he attended Massachusetts Institute of Technology as a cross-registered student[16] and later worked at the United Nations Secretariat in New York City as an Assistant Economics Affairs Officer in 1963. He subsequently worked as a resident tutor at Lowell House at Harvard University.[17]

Family and personal life

Swamy met Roxna Kapadia, whose father was member of Indian Civil Service (British India) and an Indian lady of Parsi ethnicity who was studying PhD in mathematics at Harvard University.[18][19] They were married in June 1966. Swamy has two daughters. The elder daughter, Gitanjali Swamy, is an entrepreneur and private equity professional. She is married to Sanjay Sarma, a professor at MIT, who is the son of E.A.S Sarma, a retired IAS officer and former secretary of Economic Affairs to the government of India.[citation needed] The younger daughter, Suhasini Haidar, is a print and television journalist married to Nadeem Haidar, the son of former Indian Foreign Secretary Salman Haidar.[citation needed]

Academic career

In July 1965, immediately after obtaining his PhD in economics from Harvard, Swamy joined the Department of Economics at the Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences as an assistant professor.[12][3] in 1969, he was made an associate professor.[20] As an associate professor, he was invited by Amartya Sen[10] to occupy the chair on Chinese studies at the Delhi School of Economics.[11] He accepted the offer and even travelled to India to take up the position, but his appointment was cancelled at the last minute due to his views on India's economic policy and also its nuclear policy.[10] at that time, India was still partially oriented towards socialism and the "command economy" model instituted by Nehru, and Swamy was a believer in market economy.

Thereafter, Swamy moved to the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi where he was a full Professor of Mathematical Economics there from 1969 to the early 1970s.[3][21] He was removed from the position by its board of governors in the early 1970s because of his disapproval of Indira Gandhi's poor economic policies but was legally reinstated in the late 1990s by the Supreme Court of India. He continued in the position until 1991 when he resigned to become a cabinet minister. He served on the Board of Governors of the IIT, Delhi (1977–80) and on the Council of IITs (1980–82). He also taught economics courses at Harvard Summer School[22] until 2011, when the Harvard faculty voted to eliminate Swamy's courses as a result of his "offensive" statements about Muslims.[23][24]

Swamy currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Governors of the SCMS Group of Institutions, which includes the SCMS Cochin School of Business in Kochi.[25][26][27]

Political career

Early politics

Swamy's career started with his involvement in the Sarvodaya movement, which was an apolitical movement but which formed the foundation of the creation of Janata Party later.[28] The real turn in his political career came after his sacking from IIT. Liberal economic policies put forward by him did not go well with the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi who sneered at his plans as 'Santa Claus with unrealistic ideas'. He was later expelled from the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi. This marked the beginning of his active political career. As a staunch opponent of Indira Gandhi, the opposition part, Bharatiya Jana Sangh sent him to Rajya Sabha – the upper house of Indian Parliament.[10]

He was an elected Member of Lok sabha, the lower house of Indian Parliament five times between 1974 and 1999. As a Lok Sabha member, he represented the city of Mumbai North East twice (1977 and 1980) and later the city of Madurai (1998). As a Rajya Sabha member, herepresented Uttar Pradesh (1974) in the Parliament.[10]

During the Emergency (1975–1977)

During the period of the Emergency, he fled to the United States, seeking haven with an Indian businessman in Michigan who had become the spokesperson of the opposition in the United States. In 1976, when the Emergency was still in force and an arrest warrant had been issued in his name, Swamy came to Parliament to attend the session and managed to escape India after the session was adjourned. This act of defiance was well received in the eyes of opposition parties.[29][30]

In Janata Party

In 1981, he along with Harish Rawat and 13 others led first pilgrimage to Kailash–Manasarovar after 1962 Sino-Indian War.[31] In 1984, Swamy stated his opinion that Janata Party should focus on organisational levels of the party.[32] In February 1984, he filed his nomination for Janata Party President against Chandra Shekhar, but lost.[33][34] In the same year, 1984, Swamy was expelled from Janata Party after he levelled allegations against Chandra Shekhar that Shekhar had manipulated the Janata Party presidency election.[35] Subsequently, he joined Lok Dal, party of former Prime Minister Charan Singh.[36] He fought 1984 Lok Sabha election from Mumbai North East Lok Sabha constituency on Lok Dal ticket, but lost.[37]

In May 1988, Lok Dal (A) was merged with Janata Party with Ajit Singh as its president and Swamy became general secretary of Janata Party.[38][39] Later in October 1988, Janata Dal was formed by merging major opposition parties with Janata Party one of its constituent. But Swamy along with Indubhai Patel, H. D. Deve Gowda, Syed Shahabuddin, Sarojini Mahishi refused to accept the merger of Janata Party into Janata Dal and remained in Janata Party.[40][41] In December 1990, he was elected as president of Janata Party by Central Parliamentary Board.[42]

Electoral history

Minister of Commerce and Law of India (1990–1991)

During 1990 and 1991, Swamy served as a member of the Planning Commission of India and as Cabinet Minister of Commerce and Law. On 27 December 1990, Financial Times published an interview of Swamy by David Housego in which he claimed that the decision to raise import duties by his government is a "panic reaction".[43] In Parliament Prime Minister Chandra Shekhar claimed that Swamy had denied what had been attributed to him in the article, but David Housego who wrote the story stood firmly by it.[44][45]

Later years

Swamy at launching a book with BJP members in 2014.

Between 1994 and 1996, Swamy was chairman of the Commission on Labour Standards and International Trade (equivalent in rank to a cabinet minister) under Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao.[10] In 1997, he filed a petition against P. Chidambaram in Delhi High Court, which alleged that Chidambaram had violated Prevention of Corruption Act while purchasing shares of Fairgrowth Financial Services Limited in 1991.[46][47] But in 1998, Delhi High Court dismissed his petition under technical grounds.[48][49]

During 1998 general election, Swamy formed an alliance with J. Jayalalithaa's AIADMK and won from Madurai constituency.[50][51] One year later, on 29 March 1999, Swamy organised a tea party to bring various opposition leaders together.[52] This meeting was attended by various leaders like Chandra Shekhar, P. V. Narasimha Rao, H. D. Deve Gowda, J. Jayalalithaa, Manmohan Singh, Sonia Gandhi etc.[53][54] This led to AIADMK's withdrawal from NDA coalition government and the government lost the majority in the Lok Sabha.[55][56][57]

On 11 October 2004, Swamy along with Chandra Shekhar and George Fernandes formed Rashtriya Swabhiman Manch to oppose Sonia Gandhi and policies adopted by UPA government.[58][59] He continued to be president of the Janata Party till 2013. On 11 August 2013, Swamy officially joined the BJP when its president was Rajnath Singh. His admission to the party would mark the merger of the Janata Party with the Bharatiya Janata Party.[60]

On 8 April 2015, Swamy formed Virat Hindustan Sangam, an right-wing cultural organisation to push issues like building Ram Mandir, scrapping Article 370 and bringing Uniform Civil Code.[61][62]

Court petitions

Complaint against Jayalalithaa

In 1996, Swamy had filed a criminal complaint against Jayalalithaa which led to her prosecution, conviction and sentencing to four years imprisonment by the trial court in 2014.[63] Later, on 11 May 2015, a special Bench of the Karnataka High Court set aside the trial court order convicting former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalitha, who was acquitted of all charges in the disproportionate assets case.[64][65] An Appeal against the High court verdict was filed in Supreme Court.[66] The final verdict of Supreme Court came in February 2017 that indicted Jayalalitha posthumously and upheld the trial court judgement in toto.[67]

Phone tapping allegation

Swamy released a letter alleging that former intelligence chief had asked DoT to tap the phone of many politicians and businessmen in Karnataka[68] when Ramakrishna Hegde, the then Chief Minister, resigned in 1988.[69] Hegde then filed a case against him in 1989 and 1990.[70][71][72]

Hashimpura massacre

In 1987, when Muslim youths were killed under police custody, Swamy spoke against it and sat on a fast for more than a week in Jantar Mantar demanding the institution of an inquiry.[73] After 25 years he started pursuing the case once again in court.[74]

Rebecca John, a counsel for the Hashimpura complainants, told Additional Sessions Judge Rakesh Siddhartha who is conducting the trial in the case, that "there is no other motive than politics behind Swamy's plea for further investigation and it would only further delay the trial".[75]

Role in exposing 2G spectrum case

In November 2008, Swamy amongst others wrote the first of five letters to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh seeking permission to prosecute A. Raja in regard to 2G spectrum case.[76] After not receiving any response,[77] Swamy decided to file a case on his own in the Supreme Court of India regarding the matter, which then asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to produce a detailed report on it.[78] He further called on the Indian government to re-auction the 2G spectrum without the involvement of Communications Minister Kapil Sibal.[79]

On 15 April 2011, he filed a 206-page petition with PM Singh seeking permission to prosecute Sonia Gandhi on charges of corruption. He also raised doubts regarding her acquisition of Indian citizenship.[80] Swamy filed documents in the court to prosecute Minister of Home Affairs P. Chidambaram by including a 15 January 2008 letter written by Chidambaram to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Swamy also placed on record the certified copy of the minutes of a meeting between Chidambaram, Raja and the prime minister during the tenure of Raja as the MOC&IT.[81] Since criminal charges were filed against the accused, but no evidence was given by Swamy or the CBI, all the respondents have got bail as of July 2012.

Sanction to prosecute telecom minister A. Raja

On 31 January 2012, the Supreme Court of India accepted Swamy's petition against the Prime Minister's Office in the 2G case, saying that all public authorities should give a sanction within three months against any public official if a request is made for prosecution.[82]

The Supreme Court said that Swamy had the locus standi to seek sanction from the Prime Minister for the prosecution of A. Raja in the 2G case. Sanction by a competent authority for the prosecution of a public servant has to be granted within a time frame, the apex court said. Justice AK Ganguly said that the sanction would be deemed to be granted if competent authority failed to take a decision within four months.[83]

Swamy's arguments were that he wrote to the PMO on 29 November 2008, but it was only on 19 March 2010 the PMO replied that the plea made by Swamy was "premature" as investigation was being carried out by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).Raja was arrested by the CBI in the case and got bail on 15 May 2012 after spending nearly 15 months in the Tihar Central Jail.[84]

On 21 December 2017, the special CBI Court Judge acquitted the accused including A. Raja.[85]

Petition to strike down "single directive provision"

In 1997, Swamy filed a petition in the Supreme Court of India to strike down a provision which barred CBI from investigating corruption charges against officers of the rank of joint secretary and above without prior permission of the Government of India called as "Dr. Subramanian Swamy Versus Director, Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr."[86] on 6 May 2014, a five-judge constitution bench held the single directive provision as invalid and unconstitutional. The court said that "Protection of prior approval for probing graft charges against officers at level of joint secretary and above has propensity of shielding corruption."[87][88] Incumbent CBI Director Ranjit Sinha welcomed the judgement and said, "now a very heavy responsibility has been cast upon us to ensure that no innocent civil-servant is harassed."[89]

Investigation on EVM

Swamy demanded that an independent committee should be formed to check the security and safety of the Electronic Voting Machines (EVM) to avoid any rigging or tampering. He demanded that a printed receipt should be given to every voter after casting the vote.[90][91] His PIL to investigate the working of EVM was dismissed by the Delhi High Court on 17 January 2012. The court refused to give any direction to the Election Commission to bring back paper-ballot system or use of printed receipts. The Commission argued that the use of paper is not feasible due to the huge size of Indian electorate. The court further asked the Election Commission to "immediately begin a process of wider consultations" and the Parliament "to go into this question in depth and decide".[92][93]

On 22 January 2013 the Election Commission informed the Supreme Court that it would include Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) system which is in the testing phase after the court agreed with some points raised by Swamy who was the contender,[94] in the machines so that every voter will come to know who he/she is voting by getting a printed slip after pressing the EVM button.[95][96] The voter paper audit trail has then been in use from 4 September 2013.[97][98]

On 8 October 2013 the Supreme Court directed the Election Commission to implement audit trail system in 2014 general election in phases.[99]

National Herald case

On 1 November 2012 Swamy alleged that both Sonia and Rahul Gandhi have committed fraud and land grabbing to a tune of 20 billion (US$240 million) by acquiring a public ltd company called Associated Journals Private Ltd (AJPL) through their owned private company, Young Indian[100] which was formed on 23 November 2010.[101] Through this they had got publication rights of National Herald and Qaumi Awaz newspapers, with real estate properties in Delhi and Uttar Pradesh.[102] The acquired place was intended only for newspaper purposes but were used for running a passport office, amounting to crores of rupees, it alleges.[103] Swamy further added that Rahul Gandhi hid the facts in his affidavit while filing nomination for the 2009 Lok Sabha elections.[104][105]

It further alleges that on 26 February 2011 AJPL approved the transfer of unsecured loan of 900 million (US$11 million) from the All India Congress Committee at zero interest.[106][107] Swamy argued that it is illegal for any political party to lend the loan as per violation of Section 269T of Income Tax Act 1961.[108] on 2 November, the party responded that the loan was given only for reviving National Herald newspaper with no commercial interest.[109] Swamy decided to approach the Supreme Court for de-recognising the Congress party, while the Election Commission ordered the probe on 17 November 2012.[110][111]

The hearing of the case had been taken up thereafter on different occasions[112][113][114][115][116] with the court observing prima facie evidence against all the accused.[114][117][118] on 1 August 2014 the Enforcement Directorate initiated probe to find any money laundering in the case[119] while on the same day Swamy was served notice by the High Court.[120] on 28 August the metropolitan court fixed 9 December for the next hearing of the case,[121][122] while on 12 January 2015 the judge of the Delhi High Court recused himself from hearing the case stating that schedule of cases has been changed and directed that the petitions be directed before an appropriate bench.[123] on 27 January 2015, the Supreme Court asked Swamy to make out a case for the speedy trial in the Delhi High Court since the petition cannot be heard directly.[124]

On 18 September 2015 it was reported that the Enforcement Directorate had reopened the investigation.[125] Following it, on 19 December 2015 Patiala House Court granted unconditional bail immediately on the hearing to all the five accused but one.[126][127][128] on 12 July 2016 the Delhi High Court set aside the trial court order of 11 January[129] and 11 March[130] based on plea by Swamy to examine balance sheets of Congress party, AJL and Young Indian from 2010 to 2013,[131][132][133] and fixed the date of next hearing on 20 August.[134] Currently, the case proceedings are on-going in Delhi High Court.[135]

Temple cases

Nataraja temple case

Swamy had filed a petition in the Supreme Court with priests of the Dikshitar sect challenging the decision of the Madras High Court on transferring the administration of the Nataraja temple to the then Tamil Nadu government in 2009.[136]

Swamy on referring to the provisions of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, contended that Podu Dikshitars have right to administer the temple[137] and argued on handing over the administration on mismanagement grounds of temple's wealth is violation under Article 26 of the Constitution of India.[138] on 6 January 2014 the Supreme Court ruled that the administration is to be handed over back to the priests of the temple from the state government.[139]

State control of Hindu temples

Subramanian Swamy filed a petition to remove Kerala State government's control over Hindu temples by abolishing Devaswom. in 2018, the Supreme Court agreed to examine the petition moved by him and TG Mohan Das to abolish Devaswom Board. The Supreme Court issued notice to the Kerala government and Devaswom Board of Travanacore and Cochin and sought their response in six weeks.[140] in 2019, the Kerala government opposed Subramanian Swamy's plea.[141]

Ayodhya temple case

On 22 February 2016, Swamy filed a petition in the Supreme Court allowing construction of Rama temple at the disputed site where Babri Masjid was demolished in 1992, and expediting the adjudication related to order of the Allahabad High Court on 30 September 2010,[142][143] petition was accepted on 26 February to be later heard by the court.[144]

Uttarakhand Char Dham Devasthanam Management Act, 2019

In February 2020, Subramanian Swamy filed a public interest litigation in Uttarakhand High Court against newly framed law to govern Char Dham and 51 other temples of the state.[145] Swamy in his PIL, requested the court to declare the Uttarakhand Char Dham Devasthanam Management Act, 2019 'unconstitutional' which was passed in the legislative assembly of Uttarakhand in December 2019.[145] But the Uttarakhand High Court upheld the constitutionality of the Uttarakhand Char Dham Devasthanam Management Act, 2019, dismissing the public interest litigation filed by Subramanian Swamy and Sri 5 Mandir Samiti Gangotri Dham and another.[146][147] However, the Court read down Section 22 of the Act, which was about the acquisition of land for the Char Dham.[148]

Political positions

Foreign policy

China

Swamy has worked towards normalising relations between China and India. According to Swamy, the re-opening of the Kailash Mansarovar pilgrimage route was announced at a meeting convened by the People's Republic of China paramount leader Deng Xiaoping in April 1981, in which Swamy was in attendance.[149]

Israel

In various speeches and articles, Swamy has expressed his admiration for, and solidarity with, the State of Israel and has credited its retaliatory capacity for its ability to survive as a nation in a hostile Arab environment. Swamy made pioneering efforts towards India's establishment of diplomatic relations with Israel.[150]

Sri Lanka and LTTE

Swamy, on several occasions, has voiced support for the state of Sri Lanka in its role during Sri Lanka's protracted civil war with the LTTE, for which he was criticised as "pro Lanka" by his political opponents domestically.[151][152][153][154][155] in an interview given to The Sunday Leader newspaper, Swamy stated that the Indian government should attend the CHOGM meeting held in Colombo despite stiff opposition from Indian politicians in Tamil Nadu concerned for the welfare and human rights of Tamils in Sri Lanka, placing the onus on the LTTE for human rights violations during the Sri Lankan civil war,[156][157] he had favoured Mahinda Rajapaksa also during Sri Lanka 2015 election.[158][159][160]

United States

Swamy is a strong supporter of former U.S. President Donald Trump, endorsing Trump's presidential candidacy in 2016 and comparing Trump to himself.[161]

After the Charlottesville riots in August 2017, he posted a tweet urging Indians residing in the United States to "stand with Trump at this hour of his being hunted by cockeyed liberals & Left wing loonies on racism" and praised Trump for "having showed the hypocrites their place by telling it like it is."[162]

Following criticism of Pakistan by Trump, Swamy called for closer relations between India and the United States.[163]

Domestic policy

Cow

In March 2017, he brought a private member's bill to punish cow slaughter in India with capital punishment.[164]

LGBT rights

In 2018, when the Indian Supreme Court decriminalized gay sexual acts, Swamy criticised the ruling, saying "It could give rise to an increase in the number of HIV cases."[165][166]

Kashmir

In September 2008, Swamy stridently retorted against the contentions of some Indian columnists who voiced their opinions in favor of "peacefully" surrendering Kashmir to Pakistan(source?). He said,

"I would say that the silent suffering majority of India wants none of this. The 'Kashmir issue,' in fact, can no more be solved by dialogue either with the Pakistanis or the Hurriyat, leave alone the constitutional impossibility of allowing it to secede. [...]Kashmir, in fact, is now our defining identity. It is a touchstone for our resolve to preserve our national integrity. The population of that State may be majority Muslim but the land and its history is predominantly Hindu. for our commitment to the survival of the ancient civilisation of India and the composite culture that secularists talk of, we have not only to win that coming inevitable war but also resolve never to part with Kashmir. [...]
Pakistanis often cite the United Nations resolutions on Kashmir to argue for a plebiscite. This obfuscates the fact of accession of the State to India. The legality of the Instrument of Accession signed in favour of India by the then Maharaja of J&K, Hari Singh, on 26 October 1947 has to prevail anyway.[167]

Tamil Nadu politics

Swamy is well known for his critical views against the "Aryan versus Dravidian" politics of Periyar E. V. Ramasamy, calling it as the theory forwarded by the British.[168] He has been a staunch opponent of the armed rebel group Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.[169][170][171][172] He also urged the Indian government not to support the US led resolution condemning war crimes in the Sri Lankan Civil War, citing it as one-sided and not in the interest of India.[173][174] Swamy moved the court and got the order restoring quota for Sri Lankan Tamil refugees in colleges in the state.[175]

Swamy obtained Supreme Court Stay against the implementation of Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project (SSCP). He believes that it would hurt the sentiments of people who believe that this shallow land connecting between Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka was built by Lord Rama. He strongly opposes the implementation of SSCP citing that implementing this scheme will be a criminal offence under section 295 Indian Penal Code.[176][177] He wrote letters to Prime Minister of India in June 2009 asking him to stop the project[178] and had informed the Supreme Court on 14 October 2015 that the government may not continue with the Sethusamudram Project.[179]

Hindu nationalism

Swamy has made several statements in the past that reflect on his Hindu nationalist position.[5][180][181] He has called for the creation of an "enlightened secular democracy which redresses all historical wrongs done to Hindus."[182] He has claimed that India is the world's most ancient civilization that consists of "an organic cultural core which is Hindu in character."[183] He has also claimed that the Hindu foundation of India is what makes India distinctive in the world.[183]

Muslims

After the 2011 Mumbai bombings, he wrote an controversial editorial wherein, as a response to Islamic terrorism,[184] he called for the removal of 300 mosques built at sites of Hindu temples.[185] and for the disenfranchisement of Muslims unless they "acknowledge that their ancestors were Hindus".[186][4][187] After the Faculty of Arts and Sciences at Harvard voted to have his classes removed for "demonising" Muslims, his regular Harvard summer teaching sessions were cancelled because of this article.[188][4]

In a 2020 Vice interview, he stated that under the Indian constitution, "Article 14 guarantees equality of equals" and that "there is no such thing as equal rights, they [Muslim immigrants] are not in an equal category." He added, "We know that where the Muslim population is large, there is always trouble."[189][190] He later claimed that this had been misinterpreted in a tweet stating, "One fake quote is that I had declared Muslims are not equal to Hindus under Art. 14."[191][192]

Conspiracy theory

In September 2020, Swamy said that India's Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Enforcement Directorate (ED), and Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) had "unearthed huge evidence" to prove in court that Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rajput's death was "murder by conspiracy."[193] Swamy also said there had been "systematic destruction" of evidence in the case.[193] Two weeks before, Swamy had said the Mumbai Police were "complicit" in the murder, that Dubai was "involved," and that "the Bollywood Cartel remains to be identified and made as 'accessory before the murder'."[194] in October 2020, after a medical board from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) ruled out murder, stating that the actor died by suicide, a team of scientists associated with Microsoft Research, India released an independent report, "Anatomy of a Rumour: Social media and the suicide of Sushant Singh Rajput." They wrote, "Perhaps the most interesting case is that of sitting parliamentarian Subramanian Swamy, once a central player in the policy circles, now wilfully [sic] mongering deceit, and also the most popular Twitter handle in wordclouds [sic] of trolls."[195] In December 2020, after more than four months of investigation, the CBI sent Swamy a 3-page letter stating it was looking into all aspects of the case "in a thorough and professional manner using latest scientific techniques," and that "no aspect has been ruled out," but making no mention of Swamy's conspiracy theories.[196]

Honours and awards

Year Name Awarding organisation Ref.
2012 Distinguished Alumni Award. Hindu College, University of Delhi. [197]
2016 Tamil Ratna America Tamil Sangam [198]

Books, research papers and journals

Swamy is the author of several books, research papers and journals. A complete list of papers, books and journals authored by him is given below. He has also co-authored with Paul Samuelson, a paper on the Theory of Index Numbers (American Economic Review, 1974) and another in the Royal Economic Society's Economic Journal (1984).[16]

Books

  • Hindutva and National Renaissance (Publisher: Har Anand Publication; ISBN 978-81-241-1527-5)
  • Virat Hindu Identity - Concept and its Power (Publisher: Har Anand Publication; ISBN 978-81-241-1770-5)
  • Economic Growth in China and India, 1952–70 (Publisher: University of Chicago Press; ISBN 978-0-226-78315-4)
  • Indian economic planning: an alternative approach (Publisher: Barnes & Noble / Vikas publications; ISBN 978-0-389-04202-0)
  • Building a New India: an Agenda for National Renaissance (Publisher: UBS PUBLISHERS' AND DISTRIBUTORS LTD; ISBN 978-81-85674-21-6)
  • India's Labour Standards and the WTO Framework (Publisher: Konark Publishers; ISBN 978-81-220-0585-1)
  • India's economic performance and reforms: a perspective for the new millennium (Publisher: Konark Publishers; ISBN 978-81-220-0594-3)
  • Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi: Unanswered Questions and Unasked Queries (Publisher: Konark Publishers; ISBN 978-81-220-0591-2)
  • India's China perspective (Publisher: Konark Publishers; ISBN 978-81-220-0606-3)
  • Financial Architecture and Economic Development in China and India (Publisher: Konark Publishers; ISBN 978-81-220-0718-3)
  • Trade and Industry in Japan: a Guide to Indian Entrepreneurs and Businessmen (Publisher: Prentice-Hall of India; ISBN 978-81-203-0785-8)
  • Sri Lanka in Crisis: India's Options (Publisher: Har Anand Publications; ISBN 978-81-241-1260-1)
  • Kailas and Manasarovar after 22 years in Shiva's domain (Publisher: Allied Publishers)
  • Hindus Under Siege (Publisher: Har Anand Publications; ISBN 978-81-241-1207-6)
  • Rama Setu: Symbol of National Unity (Publisher: Har Anand Publications; ISBN 978-81-241-1418-6)
  • Terrorism in India: a Strategy of Deterrence for India's National Security (Publisher: Har Anand Publications; ISBN 978-81-241-1344-8)
  • Corruption and Corporate Governance in India: Satyam, Spectrum & Sundaram (Publisher: Har Anand Publications; ISBN 978-81-241-1486-5)
  • 2G Spectrum Scam (Publisher: Har Anand Publications; ISBN 978-81-241-1638-8)
  • Electronic Voting Machines: Unconstitutional and Tamperable (Publisher: Vision Books; ISBN 978-81-7094-798-1)
  • Swamy, Subramanian (2009). "Predictions and Meditations". India International Centre Quarterly. 36 (3/4): 202–222. JSTOR 23006413.
  • The Ideology of India’s Modern Right (Publisher: Har Anand Publications; ISBN 978-8124118924)
  • RESET: Regaining India’s Economic Legacy (Publisher: Rupa Publications; ISBN 978-93-5333-651-6) RESET was top selling new eBook of 2019.[199]
  • Himalayan Challenge: India, China and the Quest for Peace (Publisher: Rupa Publications India; ISBN 978-93-90356-19-5)[200]
  • The Hindu Manifesto for India's Democracy (Publisher: Har Anand Publications; ISBN 978-9391504489)[201]

Articles

  • "Can India make it? India's path to sustained growth" (Publisher: Harvard Asia Pacific review, Volumes 6–8 by Harvard University. Dept. of East Asian Languages and Civilizations, 2002)
  • "The response to economic challenge: a comparative economic history of China and India", 1870–1952 (Publisher: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 93 by Harvard University by the MIT Press, 1979)

Research papers

  • Economic growth and income distribution in a developing nation (Publisher: Harvard University, 1965)
  • Nuclear policy for India (Publisher: Bharatiya Jana Sangh Publication, 1968)
  • Plan for full employment (Publisher: Bharatiya Jana Sangh, 1970)
  • Theoretical aspects of index numbers (Publisher: Harvard Institute of Economic Research, 1985)
  • Land reforms: an economist's approach (Publisher: Deendayal Research Institute)
  • Samuelson, P. A.; Swamy, S. (1974). "Invariant Economic Index Numbers and Canonical Duality: Survey and Synthesis". The American Economic Review. 64 (4): 566–593. JSTOR 1813311.
  • Swamy, Subramanian (1970). "On Samuelson's Conjecture". Indian Economic Review. 5 (2): 169–175. JSTOR 23294448.
  • Swamy, Subramanian (1965). "Consistency of Fisher's Tests". Econometrica. 33 (3): 619–623. doi:10.2307/1911757. JSTOR 1911757.
  • Swamy, Subramanian (1963). "Notes on Fractile Graphical Analysis". Econometrica. 31 (3): 551–554. doi:10.2307/1909994. JSTOR 1909994.
  • Swamy, Subramanian (1969). "Optimal Allocation of Investment in a Two-Sector Model with Foreign Aid". Indian Economic Review. 4 (1): 35–44. JSTOR 23294380.
  • Swamy, Subramanian (1969). "Systems Analysis of Strategic Defence Needs: A Sequel". Economic and Political Weekly. 4 (18): 772. JSTOR 40739578.

See also

References

  1. ^ Mohan, R (14 July 2017). "Rajini has right to take his own decision on politics". The Asian Age.
  2. ^ "Disgruntled and Dangerous". Open The Magazine. 31 July 2014.
  3. ^ a b c "High Court of Delhi : Swamy's plea for recovery of dues from IIT". Zee News. 26 February 2012. Archived from the original on 28 February 2012. Retrieved 27 February 2012.
  4. ^ a b c Anand, Geeta (1 July 2016). "Taking Down Politicians for Decades, and Rising in India's Government". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 6 May 2020. Retrieved 2 April 2020.
  5. ^ a b Hall, Ian (25 September 2019). Modi and the reinvention of Indian foreign policy. Policy Press. p. 108. ISBN 978-1-5292-0462-9. OCLC 1090162885.
  6. ^ "I am Brahmin, I can't be 'chowkidar': Subramanian Swamy". Deccan Herald. 25 March 2019. Archived from the original on 7 November 2020. Retrieved 31 August 2020.
  7. ^ Rao, Parsa Venkateshwar Jr., ed. (19 July 2011). "The paradox called Subramanian Swamy". DNA. Archived from the original on 6 January 2014. Retrieved 2 March 2014.
  8. ^ "Subramanian Swamy : Lets salute the real fighter 'SINGHAM". Archived from the original on 15 January 2018. Retrieved 15 January 2018.
  9. ^ "Subramanian Swamy uncovered: Doting wife, leftist brother and more". Firstpost. 14 February 2012. Archived from the original on 19 February 2014. Retrieved 17 December 2013.
  10. ^ a b c d e f Malik, Ashok (31 December 2011). "The Beastly Beatitudes: The rise, fall and resurrection of Subramanian Swamy". Tehelka. Archived from the original on 16 June 2018. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  11. ^ a b Arora, Sunit (1 January 1970). "The Jury Is Out, Subramanian Swamy: is the man a solution o\r a riddle?". Outlook. Archived from the original on 13 March 2016. Retrieved 3 January 2012.
  12. ^ a b c d e Subramanian, Samanth (1 May 2012). "The Outlier: The inscrutable politics of Subramanian Swamy". The Caravan. Archived from the original on 4 May 2012. Retrieved 5 May 2012.
  13. ^ Nadar, A. Ganesh (2 January 2012). "Why should I dislike Chidambaram?: Swamy". Rediff. Archived from the original on 8 February 2022. Retrieved 8 February 2022.
  14. ^ "Subramanian Swamy - the Mathematics Genealogy Project". Archived from the original on 6 May 2020. Retrieved 26 October 2019.
  15. ^ Swamy, Subramanian (17 December 2009). "An Indian tribute: Paul Samuelson, Guru". Archived from the original on 25 April 2012. Retrieved 29 December 2011.
  16. ^ a b Swamy, Subramanian (22 December 2009). "Subramanian Swamy: Samuelson - A genius who was my guru". Business Standard India. Archived from the original on 6 May 2020. Retrieved 13 September 2019.
  17. ^ Dingee, William R. (2011). "Harvard Economist Accused of 'Spreading Enmity Between Communities'". Harvard Crimson, Flyby The blog of The Harvard Crimson. Archived from the original on 14 September 2019. Retrieved 14 September 2019.
  18. ^ Elizabeth Roche (8 February 2013). "Perfect co-petitioners". Livemint. Archived from the original on 19 September 2013. Retrieved 1 September 2013.
  19. ^ "The well-regarded Supreme Court advocate on her husband: Sunit Arora Interviews Roxna Swamy". Outlook. Archived from the original on 18 February 2016. Retrieved 3 January 2012.
  20. ^ "Harvard removes Subramanian Swamy's courses over controversial column". Indiaeducationreview. Archived from the original on 6 May 2020. Retrieved 6 January 2012.
  21. ^ "The Rediff Special: The Man People Love to Hate". Rediff.com. Archived from the original on 15 June 2012. Retrieved 25 February 2012.
  22. ^ Special Correspondent (15 February 2011). "Swamy to teach at Harvard". The Hindu. Chennai. Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 15 February 2011. {{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  23. ^ "Harvard kills courses by controversial summer school instructor". www.insidehighered.com. 8 December 2011. Archived from the original on 5 May 2020. Retrieved 2 April 2020.
  24. ^ Sehgal, Ujala (30 July 2011). "Harvard Instructor May Face Removal Over Anti-Muslim Op-Ed". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 6 May 2020. Retrieved 2 April 2020.
  25. ^ "Management". SCMS Group of Institutions. SCMS Group. Archived from the original on 16 September 2011. Retrieved 11 August 2011.
  26. ^ "Politician Subramanian Swamy". in.com India. in.com (web18). Archived from the original on 3 June 2012.
  27. ^ "Management". SCMS Group of Educational Institutions. Archived from the original on 6 May 2020. Retrieved 13 April 2020.
  28. ^ "My Experiences with Jayaprakash Narayan — Subramanian Swamy". Janata Party Website. Archived from the original on 28 August 2012.
  29. ^ "Animosity between PC, Swamy spans decades". Archived from the original on 21 October 2020. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  30. ^ "Cables: Swamy, an ultranationalist". The New Indian Express. Archived from the original on 24 October 2013. Retrieved 19 October 2013.
  31. ^ Pathak, Pratul (31 October 1981). "Kailas-Manasarovar: The abode of Lord Shiva and cosmic centre of the universe". India Today. Archived from the original on 12 March 2022. Retrieved 21 April 2022.
  32. ^ February 29, India Today Digital. "I am opposed to any electoral adjustments with the communists: Subramaniam Swamy". India Today. Archived from the original on 29 December 2021. Retrieved 20 February 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  33. ^ "As countdown for Janata Party president election begins, infighting comes to the fore". India Today. Archived from the original on 30 January 2022.
  34. ^ "Janata Party's plenary session turns out to be an out-and-out Chandra Shekhar affair". India Today. Archived from the original on 29 January 2022.
  35. ^ "People - Swamy : refusing to kow-tow". The Illustrated Weekly of India. 15 July 1984. p. 194.
  36. ^ Nandy, Pritish (15 May 1988). "The Usurpers". The Illustrated Weekly of India. p. 1295.
  37. ^ "1984 Lok Sabha elections". Archived from the original on 15 May 2019. Retrieved 13 February 2023.
  38. ^ Nandy, Pritish (15 May 1988). "The Usurpers". The Illustrated Weekly of India. p. 1294.
  39. ^ "Ajit Singh catapulted as Janata Party president". India Today. 15 June 1988. Archived from the original on 11 February 2023. Retrieved 11 February 2023.
  40. ^ "Blundering On". India Today. Archived from the original on 11 February 2023. Retrieved 11 February 2023.
  41. ^ "State chiefs' selection deepens rift in Janata Dal". India Today. Archived from the original on 11 February 2023. Retrieved 11 February 2023.
  42. ^ "Swamy elected as president". Leicester Mercury. 19 December 1990. p. 2.
  43. ^ "Liberalism with drive in New Delhi, David Housego profiles leading leading free marketeer Subramanian Swamy" (PDF). Financial Times. 27 December 1990. p. 4.
  44. ^ Paranjoy Guha Thakurta (31 January 1991). "Subramanian Swamy embarrasses himself by threatening Lok Sabha Speaker Rabi Ray". India Today. Archived from the original on 28 December 2021. Retrieved 3 January 2022.
  45. ^ Gangwar, Santosh Kumar; et al. (8 January 1991). "Re. Reported Interview given by the Minister of Commerce and Minister of Law and Justice, Shri Subramaniam Swamy, to the Financial Times, London. about Taxation". Lok Sabha Digital Library. Archived from the original on 3 January 2022. Retrieved 3 January 2022.
  46. ^ "Hc Notice On Swamy Plea Against Chidambaram". Business Standard India. 20 August 1997. Archived from the original on 21 February 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  47. ^ "Hc Issues Notice To Chidambaram". Business Standard India. 6 September 1997. Archived from the original on 21 February 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  48. ^ "Chidambaram, a magnet to controversy". www.rediff.com. Archived from the original on 14 February 2022. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  49. ^ "Subraminam Swamy vs State (Nct Of Delhi & Anr) on 23 January, 1998". Indian Kanoon. Archived from the original on 21 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  50. ^ Thomas, K.M.; Natarajan, Anand (23 February 1998). "Tamil Nadu: Subramaniam Swamy patches up with Amma to contest jointly with AIADMK-BJP". India Today. Archived from the original on 25 July 2021. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  51. ^ Madurai, Constituency Profile (11 February 1998). "Rediff On The NeT: 'A BJP government at the Centre will protect the minorities'". Rediff.com. Archived from the original on 11 March 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  52. ^ Kaushal, Pradeep. "Encounters of a kind". Indian Express. Archived from the original on 11 March 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  53. ^ Dasgupta, Swapan (26 April 1999). "'Managing power not be a bed of roses for Congress unaccustomed to coalition politics'". India Today. Archived from the original on 11 March 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  54. ^ "Rediff On The NeT: Jaya meets Sonia, warns of 'political quake'". m.rediff.com. Archived from the original on 5 December 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  55. ^ Dugger, Celia W. (15 April 1999). "India's Ruling Party Loses Its Partner, and Its Majority Standing". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 11 March 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  56. ^ Dugger, Celia W. (18 April 1999). "COALITION TOPPLES IN INDIA, DEFEATED BY JUST ONE VOTE". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 11 March 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  57. ^ "When Subramanian Swamy turned his attention to an old enemy and friend – J Jayalalithaa". The News Minute. 10 May 2015. Archived from the original on 11 March 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  58. ^ "Sonia-baiters yet to reveal agenda". gulfnews.com. 12 October 2004. Archived from the original on 4 March 2023. Retrieved 4 March 2023.
  59. ^ "National Swabhiman Manch formed". The Tribune. 12 October 2004. Archived from the original on 4 March 2023. Retrieved 4 March 2023.
  60. ^ "Subramanian Swamy's Janta Party merges with BJP". The Indian Express. 11 August 2013. Archived from the original on 7 May 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  61. ^ "Subramanian Swamy launches Hindutva outfit". The Economic Times. 8 April 2015. ISSN 0013-0389. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
  62. ^ "BJP's Subramaniam Swamy launches Hindutva outfit". The Indian Express. 8 April 2015. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
  63. ^ "Jayalalithaa conviction: As it happened". The Hindu. 27 September 2014. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 8 February 2022. Retrieved 8 February 2022.
  64. ^ "Dr. Subramanian Swamy vs J. Jayalalitha on 20 August, 1996". Indian Kanoon. Archived from the original on 8 February 2022. Retrieved 8 February 2022.
  65. ^ "Jayalalithaa guilty in assets case, Gets 4-year jail term". Bangalore: India Today. 27 September 2014. Archived from the original on 27 September 2014. Retrieved 27 September 2014.
  66. ^ "Supreme Court to Hear Karnataka's Plea Against Jayalalithaa's Acquittal". NDTV. 12 October 2015. Archived from the original on 31 January 2016. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
  67. ^ Rajagopal, Krishnadas. "Jayalalithaa, Sasikala criminally conspired at Poes Garden to launder ill-gotten wealth: SC". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 14 February 2017. Retrieved 19 February 2017.
  68. ^ "Watch out! Your phone may be tapped". The Times of India. 4 August 2005. Archived from the original on 9 April 2018. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  69. ^ "Phone-tapping allegations forced Hegde to quit in '88". Archived from the original on 30 March 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
  70. ^ "Dr. Subramaniam Swamy vs Ramakrishna Hegde on 18 October, 1989". Archived from the original on 30 March 2014. Retrieved 30 March 2014.
  71. ^ "Judgment". Archived from the original on 19 December 2013. Retrieved 22 July 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  72. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 August 2013. Retrieved 18 December 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  73. ^ Shahroze Tariq Raza (14 July 2012), "Why is BJP always doing Congress a favour?", Daily Pioneer, archived from the original on 16 July 2012
  74. ^ Das, Nairita (10 July 2012), "Subramanian Swamy gets brahmastra against Chidambaram", News One India, archived from the original on 21 August 2016, retrieved 13 August 2016
  75. ^ TNN (8 January 2013). "Hashimpura massacre case: Victims oppose Subramanian Swamy's plea for further probe". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 19 January 2013. Retrieved 19 January 2013.
  76. ^ "2G chronology". Archived from the original on 24 August 2012.
  77. ^ "2G Spectrum Shadiness". The Caravan. Archived from the original on 30 November 2010. Retrieved 5 May 2012.
  78. ^ Jiby Kattakayam (6 February 2011), "CBI asked to file detailed report on 2G scam", The Hindu, Chennai, India, archived from the original on 25 August 2011, retrieved 1 August 2011
  79. ^ Re-auction 2G spectrum, restrain Sibal: Subramanian Swamy, 11 January 2011, archived from the original on 19 May 2012, retrieved 1 August 2011 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |agency= ignored (help)
  80. ^ "Permit me to prosecute Sonia: Swamy", The New Indian Express, 19 April 2011, archived from the original on 27 February 2015, retrieved 1 August 2011
  81. ^ "2G case: Subramanian Swamy submits documents against Chidambaram, arguments on January 21". The Economic Times. 7 January 2012. Archived from the original on 30 March 2019. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  82. ^ "2G case: SC allows Swamy's petition on grant of sanction". The Economic Times. 31 January 2012. Archived from the original on 22 March 2020. Retrieved 1 January 2020.
  83. ^ "Prosecuting corrupt officials: SC sets deadline for govt". The Times of India. 31 January 2012. Archived from the original on 2 April 2020. Retrieved 1 January 2020.
  84. ^ "Raja gets bail, walks out of Tihar jail". The Hindu. Chennai. 15 May 2012. Archived from the original on 18 May 2012. Retrieved 20 May 2012.
  85. ^ "2G scam case: All accused acquitted". The Times of India. 21 December 2017. Archived from the original on 22 December 2017. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
  86. ^ "With govt's single directive, law no longer above all". The Times of India. 14 February 2005. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2014.
  87. ^ "CBI can investigate corruption charges against top babus without govt nod: SC". The Times of India. 6 May 2014. Archived from the original on 6 May 2014. Retrieved 6 May 2014.
  88. ^ "Supreme Court Judgement in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 38 OF 1997" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 May 2014.
  89. ^ "CBI welcomes Supreme Court decision". Archived from the original on 11 May 2014. Retrieved 6 May 2014.
  90. ^ Special Correspondent (13 February 2010). "Swamy for expert panel on secure EVMs". The Hindu. CHENNAI. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 23 July 2013. {{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  91. ^ "EVMs not tamper-free". The Hindu. 18 February 2010. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 18 January 2013.
  92. ^ Anita (17 January 2012). "Delhi High Court says not impossible to tamper EVMs". OneIndia. Archived from the original on 21 August 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  93. ^ "Delhi HC rejects Swamy's plea to bring back paper ballots". The Indian Express. 17 January 2012. Archived from the original on 14 February 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  94. ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 10 October 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  95. ^ PTI (22 January 2013). "Voter to get paper receipt after casting ballot: EC tells SC". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 2 April 2019. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  96. ^ Legal Correspondent (23 January 2013). "Voter paper trail in phases: EC". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 24 February 2013. {{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  97. ^ "EC to use Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) System in Nagaland by-polls". Jagranjosh.com. 17 August 2013. Archived from the original on 23 November 2013. Retrieved 18 November 2013.
  98. ^ "New Delhi voters can verify who they voted for". The Hindu. 18 November 2013. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 18 November 2013.
  99. ^ "Supreme Court Directed Election Commission to Install VVPAT System in EVMs for 2014 Polls". Jagranjosh.com. 9 October 2013. Archived from the original on 23 November 2013. Retrieved 18 November 2013.
  100. ^ "National Herald case explained: Everything that you need to know". The Indian Express. 8 December 2015. Archived from the original on 19 December 2015. Retrieved 8 December 2015.
  101. ^ Gupta, Smita (3 November 2015). "Congress to revive National Herald, challenges Swamy to take it to court". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 27 February 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
  102. ^ Pandey, Devesh K. (8 December 2015). "National Herald case: Enforcement Directorate mulling probe possibility". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 8 December 2015.
  103. ^ Babar, Kailash; Sharma, Ravi Teja (14 December 2015). "National Herald case: Here's how much Associated Journals' seven properties worth". The Economic Times. Archived from the original on 5 March 2020. Retrieved 1 January 2020.
  104. ^ Sanjay Singh (1 November 2012). "Swamy does a Kejriwal, targets Sonia & Rahul for landgrab". Firstpost. Archived from the original on 23 May 2014. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
  105. ^ New Delhi, 1 Nov 2012, DHNS (1 November 2012). "Swamy accuses Sonia, Rahul of property fraud". Deccan Herald. Archived from the original on 26 April 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  106. ^ "Rahul threatens to sue Subramanian Swamy". The Hindu. 2 November 2012. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 8 December 2015.
  107. ^ "National Herald case: Sonia Gandhi, Rahul will have to appear in court". India Today. 7 December 2015.[dead link]
  108. ^ "What is the National Herald case all about?". India Today. 8 December 2015. Archived from the original on 20 December 2015. Retrieved 9 December 2015.
  109. ^ Smita Gupta (2 November 2012). "Congress to revive National Herald, challenges Swamy to take it to court". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 27 February 2015. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
  110. ^ "Swamy to move court against EC". The Hindu. Press Trust of India. 7 November 2012. Archived from the original on 10 November 2012. Retrieved 8 November 2012.
  111. ^ "EC orders probe against Rahul Gandhi for 'wrong information' about his assets- Politics News- Politics-IBNLive". Ibnlive.in.com. 17 November 2012. Archived from the original on 22 September 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  112. ^ "Subramanian Swamy's victory against Sonia, Rahul Gandhi". One India. 16 March 2013. Archived from the original on 21 August 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  113. ^ "National Herald Acquisition: Delhi Court Summons ROC to Testify Records". dailypioneer. 29 April 2014. Archived from the original on 2 May 2014. Retrieved 30 April 2014.
  114. ^ a b "Court summons Sonia Gandhi, Rahul in National Herald land grab case". Zee News. 26 June 2014. Archived from the original on 2 July 2015. Retrieved 26 June 2014.
  115. ^ "National Herald case: Delhi HC stays criminal proceedings against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi". Times of India. 6 August 2014. Archived from the original on 17 September 2015. Retrieved 6 August 2014.
  116. ^ "National Herald case: Relief for Sonia, Rahul, Delhi HC stays summons till August 13". Zee News. 6 August 2014. Archived from the original on 8 August 2014. Retrieved 6 August 2014.
  117. ^ "National Herald case: What you should know". Rediff.com. 9 December 2015. Archived from the original on 24 December 2015. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
  118. ^ "National Herald case explained: Everything you need to know". The Indian Express. 10 December 2015. Archived from the original on 19 December 2015. Retrieved 8 December 2015.
  119. ^ "National Herald case: Trouble for Sonia, Rahul as ED begins preliminary probe". Zee News. 1 August 2014. Archived from the original on 2 August 2014. Retrieved 1 August 2014.
  120. ^ "National Herald case: Delhi High Court serves notice to Subramanian Swamy". India Today. 1 August 2014. Archived from the original on 1 August 2014. Retrieved 1 August 2014.
  121. ^ "National Herald case: Delhi trial court to hear case on 9 December". First Post. 28 August 2014. Archived from the original on 31 August 2014. Retrieved 30 August 2014.
  122. ^ "Court defers hearing in National Herald case". One India. 28 August 2014. Archived from the original on 21 August 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  123. ^ "National Herald case: Judge recuses from hearing Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi plea". The Indian Express. 12 January 2015. Archived from the original on 15 January 2015. Retrieved 24 January 2015.
  124. ^ "National Herald case: SC directs Subramanian Swamy to approach Delhi HC". First Post. 27 January 2015. Archived from the original on 30 January 2015. Retrieved 19 February 2015.
  125. ^ "Enforcement Directorate reopens National Herald case involving Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, which was closed in August". IBN Live. 18 September 2015. Archived from the original on 22 September 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  126. ^ Kumar, Nirnimesh; Iqbal, Mohammed; Jeelani, Mehboob (19 December 2015). "Sonia, Rahul get bail, hit out at Modi". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
  127. ^ "Sonia, Rahul Gandhi get bail after rare court date over alleged fraud". Reuters India. 19 December 2015. Archived from the original on 24 December 2015. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
  128. ^ "National Herald case: Sonia, Rahul Gandhi immediately get bail; next hearing on February 20". Daily News and Analysis. 19 December 2015. Archived from the original on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
  129. ^ "National Herald case: Relief for Congress". Times of India. 12 July 2016. Archived from the original on 17 July 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  130. ^ "National Herald case: Delhi Court asks for balance sheets of AJL, Congress". The Indian Express. 12 March 2016. Archived from the original on 7 July 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  131. ^ "J- 2 Pronouncement of Judgements (Applet. Jurisdiction), 1.CRL.M.C 671/2016, 2.CRL.M.C. 672/2016, 3.CRL.M.C. 1317/2016, 4.CRL.M.C.1319/2016, 5.CRL.M.C.1321/2016" (PDF). Delhi High Court. 12 July 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 September 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  132. ^ "National Herald case: Congress hopes Delhi High Court ruling will end BJP, Subramanian Swamy's celebrations". The Indian Express. 12 July 2016. Archived from the original on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  133. ^ "Why is Congress so afraid of National Herald papers? Will re-apply for documents: Subramanian Swamy". Zee News. 17 July 2016. Archived from the original on 19 August 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  134. ^ "Will file fresh application in National Herald case: Subramanian Swamy to court". Business Standard India. Business Standard. Press Trust of India. 16 July 2016. Archived from the original on 21 August 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  135. ^ "'I Have No Documents to Prove that Rent Was Paid to Young India': Subramanian Swamy Deposes in National Herald Case". February 2020. Archived from the original on 3 February 2020. Retrieved 3 February 2020.
  136. ^ J Sam Daniel Stalin (6 January 2014). "Tamil Nadu government will not manage famous temple, rules Supreme Court". NDTV.com. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  137. ^ "Nataraja temple to be managed by priest, not by Tamil Nadu govt". The Times of India. 6 January 2014. Archived from the original on 12 September 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  138. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 9 January 2014. Retrieved 9 March 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  139. ^ "Nataraja Temple to be Managed by Priest not by Tamil Nadu Government". The New Indian Express. Archived from the original on 19 August 2016. Retrieved 9 March 2014.
  140. ^ "Supreme Court issues notice to Kerala on Devaswom Board". The New Indian Express. 13 October 2018. Archived from the original on 13 November 2020. Retrieved 7 November 2020.
  141. ^ "Kerala opposes Swamy's plea to make Devaswom boards free of state's control". Business Standard India. Press Trust of India. 23 January 2019. Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 7 November 2020.
  142. ^ Rajagopal, Krishnadas (23 February 2016). "Allow 'rebuilding' of Ram temple, Swamy urges SC". The Hindu.
  143. ^ "Subramanian Swamy moves Supreme Court to build Ram temple in Ayodhya". The Economic Times. 23 February 2016. Archived from the original on 25 February 2016. Retrieved 23 February 2016.
  144. ^ Rajagopal, Krishnadas (26 February 2016). "SC agrees to hear plea to 'rebuild' Ram temple". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 6 January 2017. Retrieved 27 February 2016.
  145. ^ a b "Subramanian Swamy files PIL opposing newly framed law to govern temples in Uttarakhand". The New Indian Express. 24 February 2020. Archived from the original on 30 November 2021. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  146. ^ Emmanuel, Meera (21 July 2020). "Char Dham Devasthanam Management Act does not amount to interference in religious affairs: Uttarakhand HC upholds validity, reads down S. 22". Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  147. ^ "Uttarakhand High Court judgement in a PIL filed by Subramanian Swamy and Sri 5 Mandir Samiti Gangotri Dham and another " (PDF). Live Law. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 December 2021. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  148. ^ "Uttarakhand High Court dismisses Subramanian Swamy's PIL Opposing Char Dham Law". New Indian Express. Archived from the original on 28 December 2021. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  149. ^ "India's China policy off target, says Modi's Mandarin-speaking 'guided missile'". SCMP. 26 November 2016. Archived from the original on 14 December 2019.
  150. ^ "First Israel visas in India were issued from this MP's residence". The Times of India. 4 July 2017. Archived from the original on 8 July 2017. Retrieved 4 July 2017.
  151. ^ "India shouldn't support resolution against Lanka: Swamy". IBNLive. 10 March 2012. Archived from the original on 22 September 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  152. ^ "Karunanidhi enacting drama, says Jayalalithaa on DMK pull-out from UPA". India Today. 19 March 2013. Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 14 December 2013.
  153. ^ Yatawara, Dhaneshi (8 September 2013). "Think as Sri Lankans first". Sunday Observer. Archived from the original on 6 May 2016. Retrieved 25 July 2016.
  154. ^ "Swamy slams DMK chief for remarks on Indo-Sri Lankan relations". Zee News. 13 August 2012. Archived from the original on 19 December 2013. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
  155. ^ "Subramanian Swamy attacked by lawyers in Madras HC". Hindustan Times. 17 February 2009. Archived from the original on 17 September 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  156. ^ "India Must Ignore LTTE's Financial Orphans – Dr Subramanium Swamy". Archived from the original on 14 December 2013. Retrieved 14 December 2013.
  157. ^ PM may skip CHOGM meet due to opposition. Hindustan Times. 8 November 2013. Archived 11 November 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  158. ^ "Give Rajapaksa Bharat Ratna for wiping out LTTE". Zee News. 11 February 2012. Archived from the original on 27 October 2014. Retrieved 27 October 2014.
  159. ^ "Tamil activists burn Subramanian Swamy's effigy after he demands Bharat Ratna for Rajapaksa". Times of India. 21 October 2014. Archived from the original on 27 October 2014. Retrieved 27 October 2014.
  160. ^ "Large fraction of Tamils will vote for President Rajapaksa – Subramaniam Swamy". itnnews.lk. 28 November 2014. Archived from the original on 23 August 2016. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  161. ^ "Modi's Bet on 'Trump of India' Signals Risks to Reform Push". Bloomberg. 24 May 2016. Archived from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 6 July 2018.
  162. ^ "Subramanian Swamy Gets Trolled on Twitter". 18 August 2017. Archived from the original on 7 July 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2018.
  163. ^ "After US President Trump's anti-Pak tweet, Subramanian Swamy calls for stronger India-US relations". Archived from the original on 7 July 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2018.
  164. ^ "Subramanian Swamy brings bill seeking death penalty for cow slaughter". Financialexpress. 24 March 2017. Archived from the original on 26 July 2022. Retrieved 26 July 2022.
  165. ^ "'It Will Give Rise to HIV Cases': Subramanian Swamy Frowns at SC Verdict on Section 377". News18. 6 September 2018. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2020.
  166. ^ "Joy in India as gay sex becomes legal". BBC News. 6 September 2018. Archived from the original on 9 November 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2020.
  167. ^ "Kashmir defines Indian identity". The Hindu. Chennai, India. 25 September 2008.
  168. ^ "Tamil Nadu / Madurai News : "Caste not birth-based"". The Hindu. 18 June 2011. Archived from the original on 6 August 2013.
  169. ^ "Janata Party chief Subramanian Swamy appears before tribunal examining LTTE ban". The Times of India. Press Trust of India. 28 October 2010. Archived from the original on 3 April 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2016.
  170. ^ "LTTE part of the problem: Swamy". The Hindu. 13 November 2008. Archived from the original on 16 December 2013. Retrieved 23 July 2013.
  171. ^ "<< EPDP News >>". www.epdpnews.com. Archived from the original on 10 May 2012.
  172. ^ "Swamy criticises Karuna's statement on refugees". The New Indian Express. 16 May 2012. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 22 June 2014.
  173. ^ "Subramanian Swamy asks US to work with Sri Lanka on resolution at UNHRC". The Economic Times. Press Trust of India. 8 March 2013. Archived from the original on 9 November 2013. Retrieved 13 May 2013.
  174. ^ "India should not support resolution against Sri Lanka: Subramanian Swamy". Channel One. Archived from the original on 9 November 2013.
  175. ^ "Higher Education Remains a Struggle for Refugees". The New Indian Express. 22 June 2014. Archived from the original on 5 September 2014. Retrieved 22 June 2014.
  176. ^ "Ram Setu project is illegal, arbitrary and unacceptable: Subramanian Swamy". DNA. ANI. 25 February 2013. Archived from the original on 28 February 2013. Retrieved 23 July 2013.
  177. ^ Demolition of Ram Setu a criminal offence: Dr. Subramanian Swamy tells SC. UNI. indlaw.com. Archived 3 March 2014 at the Wayback Machine
  178. ^ "Hold Sethu project implementation, says Swamy, சேது.. 'ஹோல்ட் ஆன்': சாமி" (in Tamil). OneIndia Tamil. 18 June 2009. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 16 October 2011.
  179. ^ "Govt. decided not to "touch" Ram Sethu, Swamy tells SC". The Hindu. 14 October 2015. Archived from the original on 12 January 2016. Retrieved 14 October 2015.
  180. ^ Wojczewski, Thorsten (2019), Stengel, Frank a.; MacDonald, David B.; Nabers, Dirk (eds.), "Conceptualizing the Links Between Populism, Nationalism and Foreign Policy: How Modi Constructed a Nationalist, Anti-establishment Electoral Coalition in India", Populism and World Politics, Springer International Publishing, pp. 251–274, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04621-7_10, ISBN 978-3-030-04620-0, S2CID 159230600
  181. ^ Sajjad, Muhammad Waqas (2018). "Examining the State of Muslim Minority under Modi's BJP since 2014". Strategic Studies. 38 (4): 19–36. doi:10.53532/ss.038.04.00130. ISSN 1029-0990. JSTOR 48544275. S2CID 248838817.
  182. ^ Anand, D. (2016). Hindu nationalism in india and the politics of fear. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 89. ISBN 978-1-349-37190-7. OCLC 951515192.
  183. ^ a b Wojczewski, Thorsten (2018). India's foreign policy discourse and its conceptions of world order : the quest for power and identity. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-29718-0. OCLC 1050943305.
  184. ^ Sehgal, Ujala (30 July 2011). "Harvard Instructor May Face Removal Over Anti-Muslim Op-Ed". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 6 May 2020. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
  185. ^ Carmichael, Mary (2 January 2012). "Pushed out of Harvard, professor returns fire". Boston.com. Archived from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
  186. ^ Tripathy, Jyotirmaya; Padmanabhan, Sudarsan, eds. (14 March 2014). The democratic predicament : cultural diversity in Europe and India. Routledge. pp. xv. ISBN 978-1-317-80942-5. OCLC 873805715.
  187. ^ Jain, Radhika; Wu, Kevin J. (7 December 2011). "Faculty Cancel Controversial Summer School Instructor's Courses, Debate Reaction to 'Occupy'". The Harvard Crimson. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2020.
  188. ^ "Harvard drops Indian MP's courses". BBC News. 8 December 2011. Archived from the original on 6 June 2020. Retrieved 16 May 2020.
  189. ^ "After UN official, Subramanian Swamy warns of suing BBC HARDtalk". The Week. 2 June 2020. Archived from the original on 10 May 2021. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  190. ^ "India Burning (Clip) | VICE on SHOWTIME - YouTube". www.youtube.com. Archived from the original on 23 January 2021. Retrieved 15 January 2021.
  191. ^ "Subramanian Swamy claims he never said 'Muslims are not equal to Hindus under Art 14'". 16 January 2021. Archived from the original on 25 January 2021.
  192. ^ "Subramanian Swamy claims he never said 'Muslims are not equal to Hindus under Art 14'; Twitter brings up earlier interview". Free Press Journal. Archived from the original on 21 January 2021. Retrieved 15 January 2021.
  193. ^ a b "Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case: Subramanian Swamy Claims 'Trimurti Agencies Unearthed Major Evidence To Prove Murder By Conspiracy'". India.com. 12 September 2020. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 4 January 2021.
  194. ^ "Sushant was murdered: Subramanian Swamy says demand for CBI probe vindicated". India Today. 26 August 2020. Archived from the original on 2 October 2020. Retrieved 4 January 2021.
  195. ^ "Study shows BJP played a major role in proposing 'murder' narrative in Sushant's death case". The Week. 4 October 2020. Archived from the original on 26 November 2020. Retrieved 4 January 2021.
  196. ^ "No Aspect Ruled Out Till Date: CBI on Sushant Singh Rajput Case". The Quint. 30 December 2020. Archived from the original on 7 January 2021. Retrieved 4 January 2021.
  197. ^ "It's time silent majority spoke up, says Vinod Rai". The Hindu. Chennai, India. 14 January 2012. Archived from the original on 24 August 2012. Retrieved 22 June 2012.
  198. ^ "Subramanian Swamy awarded 'Tamil Ratna' in United States". 11 September 2016. Archived from the original on 25 February 2017. Retrieved 25 February 2017.
  199. ^ "The year that was: eBooks which sold most this year". The Indian Express. 31 December 2019. Archived from the original on 31 December 2019. Retrieved 1 January 2020.
  200. ^ "Himalayan Challenge: India, China and the quest for Peace". Rupa Publications India. Archived from the original on 22 December 2020. Retrieved 23 December 2020.
  201. ^ "The Hindu Manifesto for India's Democracy - Book Online, Har Anand Publications". www.haranandbooks.com. Archived from the original on 7 February 2022. Retrieved 7 February 2022.