Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 01:43 on 17 October 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Alerts

Bot-reported

• 2600:1702:59b0:97d0:2fed:b215:584a:793d (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 135 five times in the last 5 minutes (Repeating characters, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:53, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

  No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 01:17, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• Anushka Bose (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Same vandalism as recently blocked alternative account. 99.155.206.229 (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. causa sui (talk) 16:43, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

• 99.41.185.175 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - vandalism after final warning. One of a number of users involved in a shit-storm of BLP attacks on Tetsuya Nomura.Biker Biker (talk) 16:12, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Note: Page protected. Consider WP:RFPP when vandalism like this is from multiple IPs. causa sui (talk) 16:49, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

• Js1568 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Js1568 continues to revert factual statements in Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission article. Information, unfortunately, is less than complimentary about organization that article is about. However, the information is also current, factual and free of WP:NPOV. Js1568 has been warned twice Oanabay04 (talk) 16:24, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. causa sui (talk) 16:41, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

• CasanovaFrankenstein (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• Truthful Additions (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• The article about Lady Magdalene's appears to be under a concerted attack by one or two persons using the pseudonyms User:CasanovaFrankenstein and User:Truthful Additions. The Lady Magdalene's article is the only article they have edited. My understanding is that correcting vandalism is not a violation of 3RR. Earlier today I asked for admin help in dealing with this problem, which only resulted in User:Jneil receiving a remarkably rude letter from User:Alexf. Could an administrator working in good faith and good will please place the Lady Magdalene's article under protection?

-- Davidkevin (talk) 16:28, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

• (Non-administrator comment) No registered user found under CasanovaFrankenstein, and no edit history at Lady Magdalene's under that name in the last 48 hours. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 16:35, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

  It should have been CassanovaFrankenstein. Looie496 (talk) 16:46, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

  So it should. And now that I look at the Lady Magdalene's article history, this looks to me like a content dispute more than it does vandalism. I'd suggest dispute resolution. I'm also concerned that an experienced editor like Davidkevin would consider a templated WP:3RR warning a "remarkably rude letter". But this isn't the correct noticeboard to discuss that. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 16:50, 12 August 2011 (UTC)