Jump to content

MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 7 discussion(s) to MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/June 2018) (bot
Line 103: Line 103:


:{{rto|GermanJoe}} {{Added}} to [[MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist]]. --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 13:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
:{{rto|GermanJoe}} {{Added}} to [[MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist]]. --[[User:Beetstra|Dirk Beetstra]] <sup>[[User_Talk:Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">T</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Beetstra|<span style="color:#0000FF;">C</span>]]</sup> 13:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

==hdfull.us==
*{{Link summary|hdfull.us}}
Spammed by
*{{UserSummary|Farro29}}
*{{UserSummary|168.215.230.137}}
*{{UserSummary|36.81.128.84}}
*{{UserSummary|36.81.144.186}}
*{{UserSummary|36.81.133.134}}
Changing external links in movie articles to put to a movie viewing site. [[User:Geraldo Perez|Geraldo Perez]] ([[User talk:Geraldo Perez|talk]]) 02:47, 2 July 2018 (UTC)


= Proposed removals =
= Proposed removals =

Revision as of 02:48, 2 July 2018

    Mediawiki:Spam-blacklist is meant to be used by the spam blacklist extension. Unlike the meta spam blacklist, this blacklist affects pages on the English Wikipedia only. Any administrator may edit the spam blacklist. See Wikipedia:Spam blacklist for more information about the spam blacklist.


    Instructions for editors

    There are 4 sections for posting comments below. Please make comments in the appropriate section. These links take you to the appropriate section:

    1. Proposed additions
    2. Proposed removals
    3. Troubleshooting and problems
    4. Discussion

    Each section has a message box with instructions. In addition, please sign your posts with ~~~~ after your comment.

    Completed requests are archived. Additions and removals are logged, reasons for blacklisting can be found there.

    Addition of the templates {{Link summary}} (for domains), {{IP summary}} (for IP editors) and {{User summary}} (for users with account) results in the COIBot reports to be refreshed. See User:COIBot for more information on the reports.


    Instructions for admins
    Any admin unfamiliar with this page should probably read this first, thanks.
    If in doubt, please leave a request and a spam-knowledgeable admin will follow-up.

    Please consider using Special:BlockedExternalDomains instead, powered by the AbuseFilter extension. This is faster and more easily searchable, though only supports whole domains and not whitelisting.

    1. Does the site have any validity to the project?
    2. Have links been placed after warnings/blocks? Have other methods of control been exhausted? Would referring this to our anti-spam bot, XLinkBot be a more appropriate step? Is there a WikiProject Spam report? If so, a permanent link would be helpful.
    3. Please ensure all links have been removed from articles and discussion pages before blacklisting. (They do not have to be removed from user or user talk pages.)
    4. Make the entry at the bottom of the list (before the last line). Please do not do this unless you are familiar with regular expressions — the disruption that can be caused is substantial.
    5. Close the request entry on here using either {{done}} or {{not done}} as appropriate. The request should be left open for a week maybe as there will often be further related sites or an appeal in that time.
    6. Log the entry. Warning: if you do not log any entry you make on the blacklist, it may well be removed if someone appeals and no valid reasons can be found. To log the entry, you will need this number – 848467537 after you have closed the request. See here for more info on logging.


    Proposed additions

    mercola.com

    I have just purged references to this site yet again. I remove from dozens to hundreds per month. The site is worthless as a source and riddled with adds, but most of the actual additions are probably in good faith. What do we think, start managing it here or do I just keep cleaning up? Guy (Help!) 18:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @JzG: do we have a RSN discussion with the same conclusion? Otherwise maybe get that backup, and have XLinkBot do the honours while that happens? —Dirk Beetstra T C 18:10, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    It gets mentioned occasionally, but it's so self-evidently unreliable that I don't think there's any need for discussion - the article on Mercola makes it clear that we're not going to be using it as a source any time soon. XLinkBot would be handy. Guy (Help!) 20:39, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @JzG/help: plus Added to User:XLinkBot/RevertList. --Dirk Beetstra T C 21:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @JzG/help: plus Added to User:XLinkBot/RevertReferencesList.

    Although I also think that the site qualifies, unfortunately I agree with the point that we do not blacklist solely for unreliability, unless there is clear consensus to do so. XLinkBot will do until then. --Dirk Beetstra T C 21:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    tcsteluguchristiansongs.com and YouTube channel

    and its associated YouTube channel

    • Link/text requested to be blacklisted: youtube.com/channel/UCO_uQaF41Wz9eYxXgEOPXRw

    (most linksummary functions don't seem to work for such a link) Spammed by throwaway accounts / likely socks:

    Repeated dead link spam for blog and YouTube channel, continued after final warning (on IP talkpage). No encyclopedic usage for either link. GermanJoe (talk) 11:48, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Beetstra: please blacklist the main website tcsteluguchristiansongs.com too, spamming continues in Telugu Christian despite a final warning. GermanJoe (talk) 03:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    main

    Dirk Beetstra T C 13:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @Beetstra: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    lahemptours.com

    Spamming by anon reverted at Kush (cannabis) & elsewhere ☆ Bri (talk) 15:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @Bri: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Guy (Help!) 08:30, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    777score.com

    spammed in 2017 by

    with a final warning. Continued recurring spam with multiple throwaway accounts in 2017/2018 (see COIBot report). A private sports statistics collection - no foreseeable encyclopedic usage (per WP:RS and WP:EL). GermanJoe (talk) 07:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Guy (Help!) 08:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    kutt.it

    Persistent spam links placed by IPs from India, including:

    General Ization Talk 14:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @General Ization:  Defer to Global blacklist, URL shortener. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:01, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @General Ization: Handled on meta. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    pqn.pw

    IP making only spam edits, changes IP when blocked

    Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:34, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    (Tweaked the formatting a bit (no "www" in report headers) and added a link summary. GermanJoe (talk) 12:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC))[reply]
    @Ronhjones: you did not even catch half of them. plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    eyerys.com

    Spammed by

    Systematic cite spam for marketing site. Usage of single-purpose IPs and occasional deceptive edit summaries. No foreseeable encyclopedic usage. GermanJoe (talk) 12:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    hdfull.us

    Spammed by

    Changing external links in movie articles to put to a movie viewing site. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:47, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Proposed removals

    iqpc.com ?

    iqpc.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:frSpamcheckMER-C X-wikigs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: searchmeta • Domain: domaintoolsAboutUs.com
    Site was blacklisted in December 2007, the reason is unclear to me, because I lack the knowledge to parse the log.
    a). — Does it still have to remain blacklisted, or could the block be lifted ?
    b). — If it must remain blocked, would it somehow be possible to at least link to the archived version of the page (https://web.archive.org/web/20080704130516/https://www.iqpc DOT com/UK/luv/ediary) in an article ? — By the way, the original is a dead url anyway.
    --GeeTeeBee (talk) 20:43, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Troubleshooting and problems

    Logging / COIBot Instructions

    Blacklist logging

    Full instructions for admins


    Quick reference

    For Spam reports or requests originating from this page, use template {{/request|0#section_name}}

    • {{/request|213416274#Section_name}}
    • Insert the oldid 213416274 a hash "#" and the Section_name (Underscoring_spaces_where_applicable):
    • Use within the entry log here.

    For Spam reports or requests originating from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam use template {{WPSPAM|0#section_name}}

    • {{WPSPAM|182725895#Section_name}}
    • Insert the oldid 182725895 a hash "#" and the Section_name (Underscoring_spaces_where_applicable):
    • Use within the entry log here.
    Note: If you do not log your entries, it may be removed if someone appeals the entry and no valid reasons can be found.

    Addition to the COIBot reports

    The lower list in the COIBot reports now have after each link four numbers between brackets (e.g. "www.example.com (0, 0, 0, 0)"):

    1. first number, how many links did this user add (is the same after each link)
    2. second number, how many times did this link get added to wikipedia (for as far as the linkwatcher database goes back)
    3. third number, how many times did this user add this link
    4. fourth number, to how many different wikipedia did this user add this link.

    If the third number or the fourth number are high with respect to the first or the second, then that means that the user has at least a preference for using that link. Be careful with other statistics from these numbers (e.g. good user who adds a lot of links). If there are more statistics that would be useful, please notify me, and I will have a look if I can get the info out of the database and report it. This data is available in real-time on IRC.

    Poking COIBot

    When adding {{LinkSummary}}, {{UserSummary}} and/or {{IPSummary}} templates to WT:WPSPAM, WT:SBL, WT:SWL and User:COIBot/Poke (the latter for privileged editors) COIBot will generate linkreports for the domains, and userreports for users and IPs.


    Discussion