User:Cyberbot I/AfD's requiring attention

Below are the top 25 AfD discussions which are most urgently in need of attention from !voters. The urgency for each AfD is calculated based on various statistics, including current number of votes, time until closing date, number of times relisted, overall discussion length, etc. This page is updated by a bot roughly every 6 hours, and was last updated on 17:21, 17 June 2019 (UTC).

AfD	Time to close	Votes	Size (bytes)	Relists	Score
Joe Conklin (2nd nomination)	5 years ago	0	1790	0	1128.81
Ben Hutchings	5 years ago	0	4776	2	387.56
Ghent Students Rowing	5 years ago	0	1827	0	384.65
TinyButStrong (2nd nomination)	5 years ago	0	1745	0	374.36
JoomlaLMS (2nd nomination)	5 years ago	0	1270	0	373.49
Phoca Gallery (2nd nomination)	5 years ago	0	1745	0	373.15
UBB.threads	5 years ago	0	1574	0	370.38
Rebecca Grant (political expert)	5 years ago	0	3355	1	362.34
Ibo, o sangue do silêncio	5 years ago	0	3164	1	362.24
Gyroxus	5 years ago	1	1703	0	359.47
Plogger (2nd nomination)	5 years ago	0	2603	0	358.73
JoomShaper	5 years ago	0	3786	0	357.78
AM-C (rapper)	5 years ago	0	1780	0	352.94
Austrian Gas Grid Management	5 years ago	0	1400	0	352.87
Dix mille ans de cinéma	5 years ago	0	3076	1	351.8
Magestore	5 years ago	1	2350	0	349.94
David Sidoni (2nd nomination)	5 years ago	1	2165	0	349.18
IndiMusic TV	5 years ago	0	5365	1	342.24
Jimmy Byrd	5 years ago	0	2497	0	337.49
Toranjestan Soroush	5 years ago	1	2425	1	336.85
The King of Pirates	5 years ago	1	2944	0	336.09
The Groundswell Effect (Business)	5 years ago	1	3604	1	334.64
Madrat and Chiko	5 years ago	1	2697	1	333.74
Terry Dowdall	5 years ago	0	3212	0	333.29
John Beck (politician)	5 years ago	0	2144	0	332.27

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Finders Keepers (American game show). Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Joe Conklin

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Joe Conklin
• Articles for deletion/Joe Conklin (2nd nomination)

Joe Conklin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:N, no sources listed. The entirety of the article is two lines of his career. Patsfan1112 (talk) 19:21, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 June 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:02, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:44, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete It's gone nearly a decade without anything being added or sourced. I would consider a redirect to Finders Keepers but the page doesn't mention him barely at all. An outside search gives little to nothing in terms of significant coverage. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 22:35, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
• Redirect to Finders Keepers (American game show) where the subject is mentioned. 1,635 page views in the last month is enough to suggest some people are looking for info on him. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:42, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:01, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Ben Hutchings

Ben Hutchings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This artist appears not to have received sufficient independent and in-depth coverage to pass WP:NARTIST. The most in-depth thing here is a blog interview [1], to which I would assign little weight. The rest is passing mentions or material that is published by himself or associates/associated bodies. - BTW, what does appear notable on its own strength (but does not yet have an article) is The Invisible War: A Tale on Two Scales, which he illustrated. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:41, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:42, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:42, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

• Comment he has certainly done things and published/illustrated books. I can't find any evidence that this work as the subject of enough independent, in depth secondary coverage that would meet GNG. I found this, which is a passing mention. It is all about The Invisible War, which indeed seems notalbe. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
• Thanks, have added further sources of coverage/citations which hopefully illustrate notability within the Australian arts/literary community. Boofhead78 (talk) 10:41, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:25, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NARTIST because he lacks sustained WP:SIGCOV of his life or works and it's not clear that he has had major roles in multiple substantial projects. The limited coverage around him and The Invisible War is just not enough to get him over this bar. Newshunter12 (talk) 06:34, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Ghent Students Rowing

Ghent Students Rowing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Student club, no in-depth coverage, passing mentions, self-published sources, etc. Fails WP:NORG _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:37, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 15:01, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete - indeed lacks notability. Korny O'Near (talk) 02:13, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG due to lacking independent sustained WP:SIGCOV. Newshunter12 (talk) 06:44, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lack of multiple (discovered, not presumed) sources that meet WP:GNG requirements. RL0919 (talk) 18:47, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

TinyButStrong

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/TinyButStrong
• Articles for deletion/TinyButStrong (2nd nomination)

TinyButStrong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still not notable Clnreee (talk) 06:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EggRoll97 ^(talk) 22:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Weak keep on the basis that sources like this do exist and there are probably more hidden behind web.archive and the like. I'm rather persuaded by a lot of the keep arguments in the previous afd while also having to acknowledge that I can't find anything beyond what the original author linked in that first afd. Nole (chat·edits) 00:55, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:GNG due to a complete lack of sustained WP:SIGCOV. I found no new sources on this topic in a WP:BEFORE search I did and we do not keep articles based on vague beliefs that better sources might exist and be found one day. That is pure WP:CRYSTALBALL. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:46, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 03:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:06, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

JoomlaLMS

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/JoomlaLMS
• Articles for deletion/JoomlaLMS (2nd nomination)

JoomlaLMS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

still not notable Clnreee (talk) 07:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EggRoll97 ^(talk) 22:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete An extension based on Joomla, and now it is not even provided on that platform. Doesn't meet NPRODUCT (or the essay of NSOFT). --qedk (t 桜 c) 17:46, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:GNG, WP:NPRODUCT, and does not meet WP:SUSTAINED. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:49, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:07, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Phoca Gallery

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Phoca Gallery
• Articles for deletion/Phoca Gallery (2nd nomination)

Phoca Gallery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still not notable Clnreee (talk) 07:16, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:32, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EggRoll97 ^(talk) 22:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Was the equivalent of being PRODed before and is no more notable now. Sourcing is all to self-published sources or how to guides. Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NPRODUCT. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:54, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
• Delete Dat sourcing, man... --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 18:47, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

UBB.threads

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/UBB.threads

UBB.threads (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable Clnreee (talk) 08:13, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 09:06, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 09:07, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 14:58, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPRODUCT due to lacking independent sustained WP:SIGCOV. Newshunter12 (talk) 06:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:04, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Rebecca Grant (political expert)

Rebecca Grant (political expert) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, as no significant coverage in independent sources. BilCat (talk) 01:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, she has done less than expected.

Her biggest appearance this year for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJ8BDF_gTK0

Hcobb (talk) 03:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 04:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 04:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

• Comment - It's plausible she passes AUTHOR or one of the NPROF guidelines (some of her pieces do have not insignificant citation counts - however the common name makes things difficult here). Icewhiz (talk) 15:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

You can just google for "Rebecca Grant airpower" or USAF or F-35 and all the results will be for this one specific Dr. Grant. Hcobb (talk) 23:03, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR as she lacks sufficient sustained WP:SIGCOV to meet these notability bars. A WP:BEFORE search I did turned up nothing substantial. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Camilo de Sousa. Randykitty (talk) 12:26, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Ibo, o sangue do silêncio

Ibo, o sangue do silêncio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another short film I can't find that much notability for-nor can I find any sources (heck even the IMDB does not even have a page for this, which is pretty telling). See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agaïssa, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warda (film) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Season Between Heaven and Hell for similar cases Wgolf (talk) 00:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

• Comment. It has entries in Les cinémas d'Afrique: dictionnaire and Le clap but I can't tell from snippet view how in-depth these are. There is also a match in the dissertation Film and politics in the Lusophone world (1960s-1970s) according to ProQuest, but again, I don't have access to the full document. SpinningSpark 17:05, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

• Keep. I think we have to be realistic about applying the notability criteria here. Hardly any films at all were made in Mozambique in this period, so we might presume this one notable for that reason alone. It's likely that the film attracted independent coverage in the national press at the time -- but these sources are unlikely to have been digitised and made available to general Internet searches. At the moment, this entry is the fullest summary of the film available on the Net, and valuable for that reason. It's a stub, but hopefully someone with access to the archives can one day improve it. Alarichall (talk) 18:02, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment. I've now made an entry for the director, Camilo de Sousa, so I suggest that at worst we merge the summary here to that entry. Alarichall (talk) 19:17, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:10, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM due to lacking sustained WP:SIGCOV. That independent WP:SIGCOV might exist elsewhere and be located at some distant point is pure WP:CRYSTALBALL and should not be used as justification to keep this article. We are evaluating this article on its merits today and it clearly fails notability standards today. It can be recreated at a later point if WP:SIGCOV sources are located and can be added to a new article. Newshunter12 (talk) 09:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
• Merge to Camilo de Sousa seems like a good resolution, per Alarichall's good work. bd2412 T 20:48, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
• Merge to Camilo de Sousa - per Alarichall.--Goldsztajn (talk) 22:57, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
• Merge to Camilo de Sousa as this stub doesn't have enough secondary reliable sources to establish notability per WP:GNG. Masum Reza^📞 00:31, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:03, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Gyroxus

Gyroxus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. I can see a lot of customer reviews but not sure whether this is in fact notable or not. Mccapra (talk) 19:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete This article fails WP:GNG since I found almost no coverage regarding this product besides a few product reviews in a WP:BEFORE search I did. It's not notable. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:45, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:12, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Plogger

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Plogger
• Articles for deletion/Plogger (2nd nomination)

Plogger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still not notable Clnreee (talk) 07:05, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:38, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:38, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:38, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:38, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EggRoll97 ^(talk) 22:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete Quite promotional in tone and style, with nary a third-party source helping establish notability to be seen.TH1980 (talk) 04:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Clearly not notable, no reliable source reports from google search. I'm pretty sure if we were to include all libraries, Wikipedia would explode. Viztor (talk) 12:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:47, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

JoomShaper

JoomShaper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just not notable company Clnreee (talk) 07:22, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep:I think the user:Clnreee is doing general pattern of disruptive behavior and editing as a battleground. He created this account just 1 day ago and it's seems to be he create this account only for put deletation nomination on articles. He already put a lot of deletation tag on many notable article. He is putting tag in articles and in afd pages he is writting Just not notable.

1. It has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

2.The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered and it's enough for notability. 

3. Widely written in many category-A level newspapers of Bangladesh. (Prothom alo, Jugantor, The daily Star, Sanakal etc)

4. Received international awards and honours

5. Ranked 2nd among Joomla companies from all over the world.

6. Nationally and internationally famous.

7. Arranged many international conferences & it is internationally recognized. (Joomla World Conference)--123.108.244.85 (talk) 14:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

I strongly object to the sexists attacks and unfounded allegations from the anonymous IP 123.108.244.85. I am a SHE. Clnreee (talk) 15:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:16, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete In response to anon IP. You have mentioned at your first point above that the company has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject but you failed to point to a single reference to support your assertion. Your 4th reason states that it has won many international awards and honours but you fail to provide a single example. None of the other reasons you provided have been supported by any references either. An examination of the references in the article shows the following:

1. This bdnews reference is a mention-in-passing as the founder won an award, fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
2. This Daily Star reference only mentions the company as in the company's CEO attended an event. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
3. This Sharebiz reference is based on a company announcment (attending and sponsoring a Joomla conference) and fails WP:ORGIND
4. This Jagonews reference is a mention-in-passing (name used in the title of the CEO) and fails WP:CORPDEPTH
5. This Channel Online reference fails for the same reasons as the Sharebiz reference above (pretty much the same content too)
6. This Prothom Alo reference fails as it is churnalism, relies exclusively on information provided by the company with not clear indications of independent content, fails WP:ORGIND. This reference is the exact same content and fails for the same reason.
7. This Priyo reference fails as it is based on a company announcement and also has no in-depth information on the company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
8. This howiwork reference is an interview with the founder and fails WP:ORGIND
9. This Tech Shohor reference is classic churnalism (mostly a profile on the founder) and fails WP:ORGIND
10. This Manobkantha reference is marked as a "permanent dead link"
11. This Banglatech reference is based on a company announcement (attending and sponsoring a Joomla conference) and fails WP:ORGIND
12. This bhorerkagoj reference is based on a company announcement (attending and sponsoring a Joomla conference) and fails WP:ORGIND
13. This Samakal reference is a mention-in-passing and fails WP:CORPDEPTH
14. This ittefaq reference is based on a company announcement (attending and sponsoring a Joomla conference) and fails WP:ORGIND
15. This Joomla Day reference is paid promotion from the company as a sponsor. Fails WP:ORGIND
16. This Joomla reference is marked as a "permanent dead link"

So not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability. Most are based on company marketing. Wikipedia is not a Yellow Pages nor a platform for promotion. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete this article lower importance also shown advertising and promotional. Fails WP:GNG .--Nahal^(T) 12:31, 01 July 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 14:55, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

AM-C (rapper)

AM-C (rapper) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable rapper. I can't find much in either language but fails GNG/NMUSIC. Praxidicae (talk) 13:57, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:19, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:20, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 14:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable rapper. Fails GNG. Geoffroi (talk) 10:19, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC due to lacking sustained WP:SIGCOV. Newshunter12 (talk) 07:30, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 14:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Austrian Gas Grid Management

Austrian Gas Grid Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent company notability. Most of the article is talking about the role the company fulfills rather than the company itself. creffett (talk) 13:58, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 13:58, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 13:58, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 14:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:GNG as almost all sources are self-published and the company lacks sustained WP:SIGCOV. Newshunter12 (talk) 07:07, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:11, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Dix mille ans de cinéma

Dix mille ans de cinéma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another short film I can't find much notability for. Either delete or a redirect to the director (Balufu Bakupa-Kanyinda) would be the best. The only sources I can find are Wiki mirrors (outside of a Youtube link) Wgolf (talk) 23:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

• Comment: There are plenty of mentions on Google Books, but it is true that there is little in-depth coverage. It may be better to redirect. —Brigade Piron (talk) 18:58, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mhhossein ^talk 14:21, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete This article fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG because there is a complete lack of in-depth coverage of the film, both in the sources in the article and in the sources I was able to find in a WP:BEFORE search I did. It's just not notable. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:50, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:05, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Magestore

Magestore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable company. References are not anywhere near qualifying as significant coverage in independent sources. The article has a history of promotional editing by single-purpose accounts strongly suggesting undeclared paid editing. Edgeweyes (talk) 17:19, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:21, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:21, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:21, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete The sources in this article are minor and do not at all constitute the sustained WP:SIGCOV needed to meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. The history of editing by single purpose accounts and high risk there has been undisclosed paid editing also indicates this article should be deleted to uproot such corruption from the encyclopedia. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:53, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:05, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

David Sidoni

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/David Sidoni
• Articles for deletion/David Sidoni (2nd nomination)

David Sidoni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This bio for an actor / gameshow host lacks the significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. Whpq (talk) 17:33, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:11, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 09:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete This article fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR because its subject has received nether sustained WP:SIGCOV nor had important roles in any major productions. There is also no evidence that he is any more notable now then when this article was deleted before in 2010. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:01, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

IndiMusic TV

IndiMusic TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like blatant advertising. Of its 3 sources, 2 are not independent reliable sources (ascap.com and prnewswire.com) and 1 is a book which I do not have access to. Contains inline external links to sources that do not satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH: a general listings page (alexa.com), an interview on Facebook, a patent, and to the subject itself. Searching the web, I cannot find independent reliable sources; I can find perfunctory business bios / listings and regular business announcements (they do not satisfy WP:NCORP either).

Created in 2009 by a user whose name is the same as that of the founder of the subject of the article, and whose only contributions to Wikipedia were to write this article, add very promotional content to another article in support of this article, and to add wikilinks to a third article for an identical name to that of the user in question. Lopifalko (talk) 05:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 05:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 05:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 05:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 05:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 05:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 05:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

• Comment. Sometimes better references can be found for an article with weak references. This one might help: Boyle, Christopher (March 3, 2015). "CEO, Founder Chris Pati's Independent Streaming Music Video Network; IndiMusic TV, It's All About the Music". Long Island Exchange. I added that one and a few others. As well, press releases (including those distributed by PR Newswire) aren't reliable sources themselves, but they can sometimes add useful context. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

An interview in a local paper is just another weak reference that does not satisfy WP:NCORP. As for press releases adding context, this AfD is about notability and press releases do not contribute toward that. -Lopifalko (talk) 11:56, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:53, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG due to a lack of sustained WP:SIGCOV. The article was also created by a WP:SPA with an obvious financial interest in this page, so this article should be swiftly uprooted to remove such corruption from Wikipedia. Newshunter12 (talk) 05:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 14:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Jimmy Byrd

Jimmy Byrd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO with no WP:SIGCOV. The only source in the article is not a source but a link to the East Valley Tribune main page Mysticair667537 (talk) 14:07, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mysticair667537 (talk) 14:12, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Mysticair667537 (talk) 14:13, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 June 11. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:33, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Mysticair667537 (talk) 14:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Mysticair667537 (talk) 14:54, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 14:52, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO due to a complete lack of sustained WP:SIGCOV or any sources for that matter. I found none in a WP:BEFORE search I did either. Newshunter12 (talk) 07:00, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The arguments made by Pirhayati (talk · contribs) convince me the bookshop is notable. I have added an {{Expand Persian}} template to the article accordingly. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:07, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Toranjestan Soroush

Toranjestan Soroush (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability? Not here. Viztor (talk) 14:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Viztor (talk) 14:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

• Keep, while the article on enWiki is threadbare, the Farsi-language article linked to it has several sources that appear to discuss the subject in detail. Machine translations are very poor, however, so I'll defer to editors who can actually read the sources if they disagree. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
  • As much as I noticed the Farsi article, an ordinary store on the street is unlikely to pass notability unless there is certain notable events linked to it. I'm inclined to delete until someone could inform me as to how this store is unlike the rest. Viztor (talk) 16:22, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:44, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:34, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Viztor (talk) 06:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Keep Toranjestan is notable because it is a pioneer in its models in bookselling. Ali Pirhayati (talk) 08:30, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
  • Pirhayati, would you care to elaborate? Viztor (talk) 08:34, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
    • First, the references say it is a successful model in bookselling in Iran, for example this and this. This is important because there is an economic crisis in book market in Iran and bookstores are getting closed one after another. Second, this bookstore simply has "independent reliable references with significant coverage" then it is notable according to GNG.Ali Pirhayati (talk) 08:42, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Henry Avery. all parties agree to merge, afd should not be proposed. (non-admin closure) Viztor (talk) 00:44, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

The King of Pirates

The King of Pirates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I recommend MERGE into Henry Avery article. Subject is not notable on its own. Article has numerous contradictory issues that make it not notable, starting with the language that it's an "obscure fictional book". Nomopbs (talk) 21:58, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Further explanation: I recommend MERGE this article into the Henry Avery article.

1. The first sentence in this article ("The King of Pirates is a fictional adventure by Daniel Defoe") contradicts the Daniel Defoe article under the heading "Some contested works attributed to Defoe" which notes "The King of Pirates - purporting to be an account of the pirate Henry Avery."
2. "Obscure fictional book" contradicts your idea of "notable", Deanyewest. See WP:N. Also, adding 10 more citations doesn't change the article or its notability. See WP:OVERCITE.
3. "... thought to be an autobiography of Henry Avery ..." — If it's an autobiography, then it wasn't written by Daniel Defoe.
4. "... thought to be a ... biography of Henry Avery many historians view the book as an embellished and highly romanized version of his life." — Tells me that even the historians can't agree on (a) who wrote it, and (b) who it is about.
5. The book is already mentioned on the Daniel Defoe article biography, and is mentioned several times in the Henry Avery article. The book itself isn't notable if it's "obscure".

I recommend MERGE this article into the Henry Avery article. Nomopbs (talk) 22:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:25, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Viztor (talk) 02:36, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Merge to Henry Avery. 111.68.115.165 (talk) 05:20, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
• Procedural Close - WP:AfD should not be used if you want to merge the article as nom. Even if you think it fails notability, conventional merging should be the first port of call. For a nicer phrasing than me, take a look at WP:IGNORINGATD. Close the AfD, start a merge discussion. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:26, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

The Groundswell Effect (Business)

The Groundswell Effect (Business) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Roundabout way of attempting to publicize the non-notable Charlene Li & Josh Bernoff, and their P.O.S.T Framework concept Orange Mike | Talk 01:47, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

• Merge to Groundswell (book). The concept is cited by others, but not much. Two line mention with citation in reliable source here. Another one, seemingly more in-depth, here. Overall, rather borderline for notability. Next to nothing on regular google. I couldn't find a single review on Google Scholar for "Groundswell. Winning in a World Transformed by Social Technologies" BUT the book has 5 reviews in Lib Genesis ([2]) which I recently found to be a much better search engine for book reviews :) Which lead me to conclude the book is notable, and then I noticed we already have Groundswell (book). So how about merging this concept, of unclear standalone notability, there? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 04:28, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 04:28, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:38, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Per WP:PROMO. This article is just a way to advertise a business concept the creator of the article desires be promoted and the article even links to his own user sandbox, which is a mirror copy of this article. Wikipedia is citing Wikipedia as a source here. It's clear there is some COI going on with this article. The article should be swiftly uprooted so as not to reward corruption on Wikipedia. Newshunter12 (talk) 07:58, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Madrat and Chiko

Madrat and Chiko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notable?. Possible WP:TOOSOON Ceethekreator (talk) 22:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 22:08, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

• Comment The first three pages of Ghits are YouTube videos which doesn't mean much but it shows that they don't perform in English but in some other language which we can guess is Swahili since they're from Uganda. It would be important to evaluate if they have coverage in Swahili-language publications. They do have a bit of coverage in local English-language media (and of course, if they perform in Uganda in Swahili, that's all we'll get) as shown in the sources provided in the article and others such as this and this. All in all, I guess I'm a Weak keep for now. Pichpich (talk) 23:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
• Weak keep per Pichpich.Tamsier (talk) 11:08, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:44, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:38, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lacking sustained WP:SIGCOV. Also falls under WP:TOOSOON. Based on the available sources, this duo is not notable, but may become notable in the future. That sources may exist elsewhere in a different language and could be found at some vague future point is not a reason to keep this article now, as that is pure WP:CRYSTALBALL. The article fails on the merits now, which is the only thing that matters. Newshunter12 (talk) 08:05, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:17, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Terry Dowdall

Terry Dowdall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a person notable primarily as a not yet elected candidate in a forthcoming election and mayor of a small town. As always, people do not get Wikipedia articles just for being federal election candidates: to pass NPOL #1, he would have to win the election and thereby serve as an MP, not just be a name on the ballot. And smalltown mayors don't automatically pass NPOL #2, either: to be considered notable for being mayor, either Essa would have to be much larger than just 21K, or Dowdall would have to show a depth and range and volume of coverage that marked him out as much more special than most other mayors of places this size.
But two of the five footnotes here are primary sources that do not constitute support for notability at all; two more are the routinely expected coverage in a community hyperlocal, which are not notability-clinching sources for a smalltown mayor or a non-winning MP candidate all by themselves, because every smalltown mayor and every non-winning MP candidate can always show a hit or two in their local media; and the last looks stronger on the surface if you only eyeball its URL, but is not actually about him for the purposes of establishing his notability: it just quotes him giving soundbite about a public emergency in an article whose subject is the emergency and not him. As always, getting a person into Wikipedia is not just a matter of showing that his name has appeared in the media two or more times: we also evaluate (a) the depth of how substantively a source is or isn't about him; (b) the geographic range of how widely the coverage is spreading, and (c) the context of what he's getting coverage for -- but none of this is enough.
No prejudice against recreation on or after October 20 if he wins the federal election, but nothing here (either in the sourcing or the substance) constitutes a reason why he would be entitled to have a campaign brochure on Wikipedia today. Bearcat (talk) 15:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable mayor and future federal candidate do not meet WP:NPOL. Use of Wikipedia as free election advertising would violate WP:PROMO. Bkissin (talk) 20:48, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
• Delete- small-town mayors do not automatically pass NPOL.--Rusf10 (talk) 02:51, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:17, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

John Beck (politician)

John Beck (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E of a person notable only for a two-day blip of press coverage when he was forced out of a political candidacy. As always, being a non-winning candidate for political office is not an WP:NPOL pass: if he didn't win the seat and thereby serve as an MP, then he qualifies for an article only if either (a) he was already notable enough for other reasons that he would have qualified for an article on those preexisting grounds anyway, or (b) he can be referenced to such an exceptional depth of coverage that his candidacy could be credibly claimed as special (the Christine O'Donnell pass). Receiving a two-day blip of coverage in the moment, and then fading back into obscurity, just makes this a BLP1E of an obscure low-profile figure rather than an encyclopedic biography of a person who has sustained any enduring public interest that would satisfy the ten-year test. Bearcat (talk) 15:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:52, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

• Redirect to Canadian federal election, 1993. Perhaps added under a controversies section. Otherwise, not notable per WP:NPOL. Bkissin (talk) 20:42, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:00, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete per nom fails WP:NPOL.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
• Delete, as others. Bondegezou (talk) 15:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.