Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard: Difference between revisions
Remove do not archive tags from closed cases - BOT in trial - BRFA |
WhatamIdoing (talk | contribs) →Trauma trigger: Robert McClenon, RFCs are **not** binding. Consensus can change, even if you held an RFC |
||
Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
{{DR case status|closed}} |
{{DR case status|closed}} |
||
{{drn filing editor|Pengortm|16:00, 27 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
{{drn filing editor|Pengortm|16:00, 27 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
||
{{DRN archive top|Closed at the request of the other editors. I will not comment on what is a reasonable time for discussion on a talk page. I will comment that discussion here is voluntary, and if the other editors do not want to discuss here, there will not be voluntary moderated discussion. If the filing editor wants to involve other editors, which may be reasonable, they can do this by a [[WP:RFC|Request for Comments]] (which |
{{DRN archive top|Closed at the request of the other editors. I will not comment on what is a reasonable time for discussion on a talk page. I will comment that discussion here is voluntary, and if the other editors do not want to discuss here, there will not be voluntary moderated discussion. If the filing editor wants to involve other editors, which may be reasonable, they can do this by a [[WP:RFC|Request for Comments]] (which involves the community). An RFC is probably the best approach at this point. [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 19:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC)}} |
||
<span style="font-size:110%">'''Have you discussed this on a talk page?'''</span> |
<span style="font-size:110%">'''Have you discussed this on a talk page?'''</span> |
||
Revision as of 05:31, 29 March 2020
|
Welcome to the dispute resolution noticeboard (DRN) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This is an informal place to resolve small content disputes as part of dispute resolution. It may also be used as a tool to direct certain discussions to more appropriate forums, such as requests for comment, or other noticeboards. You can ask a question on the talk page. This is an early stop for most disputes on Wikipedia. You are not required to participate, however, the case filer must participate in all aspects of the dispute or the matter will be considered failed. Any editor may volunteer! Click this button to add your name! You don't need to volunteer to help. Please feel free to comment below on any case. Be civil and remember; Maintain Wikipedia policy: it is usually a misuse of a talk page to continue to argue any point that has not met policy requirements. Editors must take particular care adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page. This may also apply to some groups. Noticeboards should not be a substitute for talk pages. Editors are expected to have had extensive discussion on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) to work out the issues before coming to DRN.
|
Case | Created | Last volunteer edit | Last modified | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title | Status | User | Time | User | Time | User | Time |
Neith | In Progress | Potymkin (t) | 15 days, 17 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 1 days, 12 hours | A. Parrot (t) | 1 days, 8 hours |
Algeria | In Progress | Potymkin (t) | 6 days, 4 hours | Kovcszaln6 (t) | 2 hours | Skitash (t) | 2 hours |
United States and state-sponsored terrorism | New | Kof2102966 (t) | 1 days, 6 hours | Robert McClenon (t) | 12 hours | Kof2102966 (t) | 8 hours |
If you would like a regularly-updated copy of this status box on your user page or talk page, put {{DRN case status}} on your page. Click on that link for more options.
Last updated by FireflyBot (talk) at 14:46, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Current disputes
James Bradley (former slave)
Closed. This dispute appears to have been resolved. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC) |
Closed discussion |
---|
Canvas fingerprinting
Closed. There are two problems with this case, one of which could be solved. The first problem is that the filing editor did not notify the other editor. If this were otherwise an appropriate case for this noticeboard, the filing editor could notify the other editor, or a volunteer could expedite by notifying the other editor. However, the second problem is that this is a dispute over merging two articles, and there is a procedure for the merging of articles. The filing editor should follow the instructions for requesting formal closure on the merge request. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC) |
Closed discussion |
---|
Trauma trigger
Closed at the request of the other editors. I will not comment on what is a reasonable time for discussion on a talk page. I will comment that discussion here is voluntary, and if the other editors do not want to discuss here, there will not be voluntary moderated discussion. If the filing editor wants to involve other editors, which may be reasonable, they can do this by a Request for Comments (which involves the community). An RFC is probably the best approach at this point. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:43, 27 March 2020 (UTC) |
Closed discussion |
---|