Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 14:08 on 13 November 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

Bot-reported

• 203.76.222.231 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:21, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• Constantine Cristin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Vandalising article past 4th warning). Jingiby (talk) 09:43, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Note: There is a history of the editor posting unsourced statements which appear to be their own speculations (commonly graced on Wikipedia with the description original "research") but it is not at all clear that it isn't done in good faith, albeit mistakenly, so it doesn't seem to be vandalism. I have given the editor a warning about posting "original research"; previously there had only been generic messages about "vandalism", with no attempt to explain to the editor what was wrong with their editing. JBW (talk) 10:34, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

• 2603:8000:d300:648c:194e:f7ff:66f2:824a (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) 2601:240:CD07:12A2:9D24:7DC8:9D31:A477 (talk) 13:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
• 2603:8000:D300:648C:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) 2601:240:CD07:12A2:9D24:7DC8:9D31:A477 (talk) 13:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)