Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 01:39 on 10 November 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Reports

Bot-reported

• 2403:6200:8832:eb35:b14e:f849:c2f6:26a8 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 231 five times in the last 5 minutes (Long string of characters containing no spaces, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 01:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• Espenthordsen‎ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content despite being warned for doing so. Theoder2055 (talk) 14:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

  Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Bbb23 (talk) 16:38, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

• 121.7.108.224 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Unexplained removals of content across multiple pages. Chyx1095 (talk) 15:52, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

  Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. They are adding info as much as removing, and the edits appear normal gnoming-type changes. Is there a specific recent edit that is concerning?Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:18, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

• Ruth Dahle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Persistent addition of wrongly cited and highly contested content in Geir Bjørklund, SPA. Cannot wait for outcome of the AfD dicusssion. Not using discussion page.--Julius Senegal (talk) 16:06, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

  Declined. The removal of the AfD nomination was a violation of policy. No other vandalism seen (or warnings). Bbb23 (talk) 16:36, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

• Orincore (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account; account is being used only for promotional purposes. !HERE, I reckon. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:07, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
• 24.51.233.217 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Evidently only vandalising pages - See [1]. Also see filter log and contribs. TheSpiciestNugget _{Hello there I did this, I guess} 18:10, 9 December 2022 (UTC)