Jump to content

User talk:210.50.143.20: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 305: Line 305:


{{unblock|1=yes, my IP is blocked but the thing is I cannot make an account until it is unblocked. Now, you know my problem that I only edited 1 page, but someone else did other pages which resulted in the block. I have deleted the other account, now no one will misuse Wikipedia from this IP. So, I thereby request if you please unblock my IP.}}
{{unblock|1=yes, my IP is blocked but the thing is I cannot make an account until it is unblocked. Now, you know my problem that I only edited 1 page, but someone else did other pages which resulted in the block. I have deleted the other account, now no one will misuse Wikipedia from this IP. So, I thereby request if you please unblock my IP.}}

{{Unblock on hold|1=blocking administrator|2=yes, my IP is blocked but the thing is I cannot make an account until it is unblocked. Now, you know my problem that I only edited 1 page, but someone else did other pages which resulted in the block. I have deleted the other account, now no one will misuse Wikipedia from this IP. So, I thereby request if you please unblock my IP.|3=[[Special:Contributions/210.50.143.20|210.50.143.20]] ([[User talk:210.50.143.20#top|talk]]) 00:38, 29 October 2010 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 00:38, 29 October 2010

Place of origin: Sydney, Australia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, at {{subst:BASEPAGENAME}}, has made edits that do not conform to our policies and guidelines and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! ~~~~

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

January 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Spider-Man, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. — Mike Trausch (fd0man, Talk Page) 07:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Asthma, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Corpx 08:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

Regarding edits made to History of Zambia

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. 1312020Wikicop 03:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Henry Parkes, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mbc 362 01:03, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Your recent edit to Instruction manual (computer and video games) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 06:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Teresa. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Soosed 09:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit(s) to Leonardo DiCaprio

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Leonardo DiCaprio page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. RazorICE 08:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page The Besties on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. --Chris (talk) 07:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Moreno, you will be blocked from editing. Trusilver 07:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- KOS | talk 09:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Spalding Method. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DarkFalls talk 06:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Time Lord. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 09:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dohar Upazila, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DRTïllberġTalk 04:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mochi ice cream. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Nightshadow28 05:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Rain, you will be blocked from editing. Lradrama 09:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Proto-Indo-European language, you will be blocked from editing. --teb728 08:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Patricia Bath:

Your recent edit to Patricia Bath (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 06:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Health:

Your recent edit to Health (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 07:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Christian Byers. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kateshortforbob 14:00, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

November 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Joan of Arc, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Carlosguitar 07:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

December 2007

Your edits to Arsenal de Sarandí

Could you not add lists of results to football club articles like you did to Arsenal de Sarandí and Rosario Central. Wikipedia is not for the collection of these statistics, please look at the Manual of style for details of what is considered appropriate for football club articles. King of the NorthEast 01:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Similar edits to Club Atlético Lanús

As requested above, please do not add lists of football results to club articles.♦Tangerines♦·Talk 23:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Book of Daniel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Steve Crossin (talk) 12:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gossip, you will be blocked from editing. -SpuriousQ (talk) 03:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Roman Forum, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. StaticGull  Talk  13:56, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Jennifer Aniston (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 02:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Wario constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 09:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Religion in Australia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Religion in Australia was changed by 210.50.143.20 (u) (t) deleting 29085 characters on 2008-04-30T07:29:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 07:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Religion in Australia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ijustam (talk) 07:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Somatotype, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Somatotype was changed by 210.50.143.20 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-04T08:56:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:56, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. StaticGull  Talk  14:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mogán, Las Palmas, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  ‑ MANdARAX XAЯAbИAM  (talk)  09:01, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Mexican cuisine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Closedmouth (talk) 07:51, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Perth, Western Australia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Perth, Western Australia was changed by 210.50.143.20 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-06-23T09:05:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Animal Farm (1999 film), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Animal Farm (1999 film) was changed by 210.50.143.20 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-07-01T13:28:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:28, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Control variable, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- RyRy (talk) 04:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Control variable. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -- RyRy (talk) 04:03, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Nike, Inc.. ukexpat (talk) 03:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dependent territory, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dependent territory was changed by 210.50.143.20 (u) (t) deleting 15328 characters on 2008-07-12T05:08:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Christian Byers has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 22:42, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bienvenidos

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Someone using this IP address has made unhelpful edits, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

If you need help see:

Here are a few more good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Unschool (talk) 05:02, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

Someone using this computer or network added this unhelpful edit. If there is more of this, it may be necessary to block editing from this address. That is a shame because others on the same network have been editing constructively. If the person responsible is reading this: please do not spoil it for those around you. Thanks. — Alan 08:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Your edits to October 20

Dear 210.50.143.20,
Some of your edits on the page October 20 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

No Wikipedia page has been linked to.

If a Wikipedia page for the person already exists, add a link to it (by putting it in doubled square brackets [[Like this]]) and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 06:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Heather Has Two Mommies has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Flewis(talk) 01:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Category:Medieval shields has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DARTH PANDAtalk 01:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Island Press (Australia) has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'tripod\.com' (link(s): http://islandpress.tripod.com/ISLAND.htm) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Evans Head, New South Wales has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Flewis(talk) 09:59, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Christian Byers, you will be blocked from editing. Bihco (talk) 07:30, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Erina High School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --[[::User:Unpopular Opinion|Unpopular Opinion]] ([[::User talk:Unpopular Opinion|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Unpopular Opinion|contribs]]) 06:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Chinese Cinderella. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CardinalDan (talk) 06:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Image, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Image was changed by 210.50.143.20 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-01-23T06:09:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 06:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Near-birth experience

I have nominated Near-birth experience, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Near-birth experience. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 05:46, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.
Nick-D (talk) 08:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Tom Roberts worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you.
SoxBot III (talk | owner) 06:19, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Max Tonetto. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. -- Mentifisto 22:54, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Max Tonetto. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. -- Mentifisto 22:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Max Tonetto. Versus22 talk 22:56, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Lismore, New South Wales has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 04:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Lismore, New South Wales. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Rbpolsen☺♦ Talk to me! 17:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 04:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you.  Nuβiατεch Talk 09:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Singapore Airlines, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bsadowski1 (talk) 07:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Tan | 39 14:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Spray painting has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bexample\.com (links: http://www.example.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of deserts has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of deserts. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of deserts was changed by 210.50.143.20 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-07-05T05:29:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Federacy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Pax85 (talk) 04:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Indonesia has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 05:29, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Killiondude (talk) 08:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Education in Indonesia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Education in Indonesia was changed by 210.50.143.20 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-08-20T05:39:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page United Nations Observer Mission Uganda-Rwanda. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. —SpaceFlight89 05:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. -FASTILY (TALK) 06:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

blocked

You haven't vandalized since that last warning, but since you have been blocked several times and continued to vandalise, I have blocked this IP for 2 weeks.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger (talk) 06:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Dante's Peak has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alan (talk) 14:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Miranda Kerr. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bfootdav (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kevin Rudolf has been reverted, as it introduced negative or controversial biographical material without providing a reliable source for this information. Wikipedia requires that all such material be sourced to address the issue of libel. Thank you. ManishEarthTalkStalk 04:47, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Last call (bar term) has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): dont.wanna.know@hotmail.com. It appears that you inserted an e-mail address to Last call (bar term). Wikipedia pages should not contain personal information. For more information, please read Wikipedia:Biography of Living People, specifically the section about personal information.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:09, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


September 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hera. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 10:17, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fairy, you may be blocked from editing. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 10:28, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may use this form to request a username. Alternatively, you may email us with your preferred username. Either way, use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. If using the form, please reference this block in the comment section.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Comments: Blocked for six months. Courcelles 11:09, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

210.50.143.20 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The page I edited had genuine information, I forgot to give references that's why I got blocked. Please unblock my IP, next time I'll will be careful while editing the pages. I didn't mean to provide false information.

Decline reason:

Your activities on September 17 consisted of six edits, all similar to this one. That's plain and simple vandalism. Considering the amount of vandalism from this IP address, the block is appropriate. Favonian (talk) 10:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

210.50.143.20 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I never edited 6 pages. I only edited 'Nokia 3250' page and provided some information about it's sound quality and loudness. I don't know who edited others, but now i have blocked the other account. So, I promise there will be never any vandalism. If you find anything wrong again, block me for longer period of time, but please I'll really appreciate your kindness if you unblock me for now.

Decline reason:

You qua you are not blocked ... your IP is, because of the way others have misused it. You can start an account if you really want to edit productively. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

210.50.143.20 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

yes, my IP is blocked but the thing is I cannot make an account until it is unblocked. Now, you know my problem that I only edited 1 page, but someone else did other pages which resulted in the block. I have deleted the other account, now no one will misuse Wikipedia from this IP. So, I thereby request if you please unblock my IP.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=yes, my IP is blocked but the thing is I cannot make an account until it is unblocked. Now, you know my problem that I only edited 1 page, but someone else did other pages which resulted in the block. I have deleted the other account, now no one will misuse Wikipedia from this IP. So, I thereby request if you please unblock my IP. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=yes, my IP is blocked but the thing is I cannot make an account until it is unblocked. Now, you know my problem that I only edited 1 page, but someone else did other pages which resulted in the block. I have deleted the other account, now no one will misuse Wikipedia from this IP. So, I thereby request if you please unblock my IP. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=yes, my IP is blocked but the thing is I cannot make an account until it is unblocked. Now, you know my problem that I only edited 1 page, but someone else did other pages which resulted in the block. I have deleted the other account, now no one will misuse Wikipedia from this IP. So, I thereby request if you please unblock my IP. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
This user's unblock request is on hold because the reviewer is waiting for a comment by the blocking administrator.

210.50.143.20 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Blocking administrator: blocking administrator (talk)

Reviewing administrator: 210.50.143.20 (talk) 00:38, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request reason:

yes, my IP is blocked but the thing is I cannot make an account until it is unblocked. Now, you know my problem that I only edited 1 page, but someone else did other pages which resulted in the block. I have deleted the other account, now no one will misuse Wikipedia from this IP. So, I thereby request if you please unblock my IP.
Administrator use only:

After the blocking administrator has left a comment, do one of the following:

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock reviewed|1=yes, my IP is blocked but the thing is I cannot make an account until it is unblocked. Now, you know my problem that I only edited 1 page, but someone else did other pages which resulted in the block. I have deleted the other account, now no one will misuse Wikipedia from this IP. So, I thereby request if you please unblock my IP.|decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed|1=yes, my IP is blocked but the thing is I cannot make an account until it is unblocked. Now, you know my problem that I only edited 1 page, but someone else did other pages which resulted in the block. I have deleted the other account, now no one will misuse Wikipedia from this IP. So, I thereby request if you please unblock my IP.|accept=Accept reason here ~~~~}}