User talk:Tjmayerinsf: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:06, 3 April 2012

Welcome!

Hello, Tjmayerinsf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mushroom (Talk) 13:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance notices from pages unless the required changes have been made. If you are uncertain whether the page requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the page's talk page before removing the notice from the page. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of a page. Thank you. — getcrunk what?! 20:34, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grue

For someone who wrote a scene of a man being turned inside out, "grue" would seem to be appropriate. See Wiktionary: grue: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/grue Pepso 22:44, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Style policy

Hi. About a day you ago, you dropped in on the Film Booking Offices of America article and changed the phrase "seven hundred theaters" to "700 theaters" (I've restored it). So this sort of thing doesn't happen again, with some other article, you should be aware of two things:

The general Wikipedia guideline on differing style preferences: "In June 2005, the Arbitration Committee ruled that, when either of two styles is acceptable, it is inappropriate for a Wikipedia editor to change from one style to another unless there is some substantial reason for the change."

and

The specifically relevant Wikipedia guideline: "Numbers above ten may be written out if they are expressed in two or fewer words, except in tables and infoboxes. Example: 'sixteen', 'eighty-four', 'two hundred', 'twenty million' but '3.75', '544', '21 million'."

Thanks, Dan —DCGeist 05:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AdW: Astound Broadband

An article that you have been involved in editing, Astound Broadband, has been listed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astound Broadband. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC) --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hitchcock films

Hi, thanks for your contributions to these articles. Just a few points, though - subheadings are usually only capitalised for the first letter, per the Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), i.e. "External links". Also, I'm not convinced that the external links to the Turner Classic film database are very helpful, as they give little extra information beyond which the articles already give. Bob talk 17:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alla / Allah

Please see my question at Talk:Garden of Allah#Alla / Allah. Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 06:30, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Color film (motion picture)

Tjmayerinsf -

Hello. You have made some wonderful additions to the Color film (motion picture) article, but all of them are uncited. I am working to clean up this article and would appreciate if you could provide citations for any of the questionable areas (noted in the article) for the information you have provided. All the best, LACameraman 00:13, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see you've been away from Wikipedia for a bit. I've been cleaning up Color film (motion picture) fairly considerably over the last two weeks. I ended up removing several passages you added in (mostly minor notes on smaller/secondary processes or companies) that I could not verify. If you have sources for these notes and would like to re-add them citing the various sources, please do. I hope when you return to Wikipedia, you have the opportunity to contribute once again to the article. All the best LACameraman 08:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TJ - Once again, you made some wonderful contributions to this article - but I have deleted the massive addition you made on Technicolor as it is not germane to this article. This information belongs in the Technicolor article, but not in the Color film (motion picture) article. That kind of detail on one system renders an overview article unbalanced.LACameraman 23:56, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

TJ - As I've noted before, you've added some good information to articles here, but neglected to cite them. Today you added a citation, but it is inappropriately placed. The passage, which you originally added, at Color film (motion picture) reads:

"Technicolor began as a subtractive color process developed by Dr. Herbert Kalmus, Dr. Daniel Comstock, and W. Burton Wescott in 1915 (see Additive section below) when Kalmus and Comstock were at MIT. The release of The Gulf Between (1917), filmed in Jacksonville, Florida and starring Grace Darmond and Niles Welch, was marred by persistent projection problems in its national tour. Only a few frames of this film are known to exist today."

You added an IMDb link as a citation at the end of this paragraph ([1]). Doing so means that the ENTIRE paragraph - or what is IMMEDIATELY preceding the citation is what that reference confirms. The IMDb confirms nothing about "persistent projection problems", a national tour or that only a few frames still exist. All that the IMDb can reference is that there was a movie in 1917 called The Gulf Between the location and cast. It is not necessary to utilize the IMDb as a reference for this material. The IMDb page references this film as the first Technicolor film, but unfortunately the IMDb is not considered a reliable resource for its' trivia entries.

I offer the above because, by way of your contributions, it seems that you may not be clear on how to use references. I have removed the IMDb reference and replaced the "citation needed" tag. The comments that Technicolor started as a subtractive process, was started during their time at MIT and that The Gulf Between print was marred by projection problems and only a few frames exist are the elements that need to be cited. The rest of the information is easily verifiable or otherwise cited in the article. Thanks for continuing to contribute to Wikipedia and to Project Filmmaking pages. All the best, LACameraman 06:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No need to spend time piping those links

Hi. I just noticed that you've put piped category links into a few articles (Castro Theatre|Castro Theatre, Roxy Theatre|Roxy Theatre) where they aren't necessary. The piped link for (The Roxie|Roxie, The) is useful, but when the first word of the article title is the word under which the subject is supposed to be alphabetized on the category page anyway (Castro, Roxy, etc), Wikipedia will place it properly in the list without the addition of the pipe- so there's no point in wasting your time adding the piped sections to those links. Whyaduck 05:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

British dates?

Is there a reason why you changed all the dates in John Stossel to the British system? Stossel is an American journalist, and when you actually click on the links for the dates the articles use the American system. --JHP 10:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you can set your prefered date system in your preferences. [[Janurary 1]], [[2000]] will then be displayed as 1 January 2000. --32X 19:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Color Film edits

Hi, Tjmayerinsf!

You might have noticed that User:LACameraman reverted some of your recent edits to Color film (motion picture), and I thought maybe I should try to explain why. The IMDB is unfortunately not considered an authoritative source. First and foremost, it is often wrong. Secondly, it doesn't cite sources so it's very hard to follow the trail past it.

Also, please don't forget to provide an edit summary, it makes it a lot easier for other people to understand your edits, especially when there are multiple ones. Thanks again! jhawkinson 13:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

William March

Thank you for your recent edits to the William March page. They did not go unnoticed and have helped in the general look and appeal of the article.

Cheers!

Diarmada 13:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

James Dean reference in The Spirit of St. Louis (film)

Hi TJ, I am curious where you found the reference to James Dean being considered for the role of Charles Lindbergh in the Spirit of St. Louis film biography. I read and reread biographies of James Stewart and could find only a reference to studio head Jack Warner offering the part to John Kerr in 1954 who turned it down. A well-known incident involving Stewart and his father making a plea to producer Leland Hayward for "Jimmy" Stewart to play Lindbergh also occurred in 1954. Stewart went on a prolonged diet to better fit the gaunt look of a younger man. Before he found out that he got the part, he had dropped so much weight that he looked ill. The role was cast late in 1954 with production shooting begun in August 1955. At that point, James Dean had just come to Hollywood to make his first film. FWIW Bzuk 02:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC).[reply]

help with Frameline Awards

Saw that you were interested in this topic. Was wondering about the Awards given out. Wanted to add them for each year but am becoming confused by different things said in different articles. Care to help? BiAndBi 23:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Mila Kunis

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Tjmayerinsf! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule stuffmagazine\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 02:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blue links

Hello. You blue-linked the name Richard Quine in the "1942 film" section of My Sister Eileen. I intentionally had not blue-linked there it because it is blue-linked in the "1940 play" section that immediately precedes it. (The name appears again in the "1955 film" section, but for some reason you didn't blue-link it there.) It's my understanding that a name or word should be blue-linked only once per article. Am I wrong? Thank you. ConoscoTutto 16:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Angerame

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dominic Angerame, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.cinemod.net/about.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 02:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Piping on disambiguation pages

Hello. Regarding these edits, please refer to the Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages), specifically the sections on piping, and limiting the number of links to one per line. Thanks! Ewlyahoocom 02:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Six Gallery Reading

Thank you for your interest and contribution to this article... --Art4em 20:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weber's last waltz

I think in an article on Reissiger in Dwight's Journal (scanned in in Google Books) Reissiger is quoted (pardon grammar... pardon me about grammar... something :) ) - on the subject of the origins of the title "Weber's Last Waltz" - that he'd sent the waltz to Weber and it was much liked by him, found among his effects and mistakenly assumed to be his (CM v Weber's, that is)- or to that effect. I'll have to look up the details and cite; I found the tale interesting... Schissel | Sound the Note! 02:01, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly reminder!

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--Midnightdreary 16:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

Thank you for starting the article on Black and Tan Fantasy. It is my favorite of all pieces of music. Kingturtle 18:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah!

Thank you for expanding the article on Borrah Minnevitch; I had quite a difficult time finding info on him. DS (talk) 03:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Follow the Boys (1963 film)

A tag has been placed on Follow the Boys (1963 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PookeyMaster (talk) 05:12, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you did not do that at International Sweethearts of Rhythm. Thanks.

• Freechild'sup? 19:26, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Periods on external links

Hey happy holidays. Question: what's the deal with the removal of periods in the external section of an article. e.g.) The Killers (1946 film). That was your only edit in the article. Inquiring minds like mine what to know since I've included them in the past. Thanks. Oh yeah, "The City" your hometown, is my favorite city in the world, and HAPPY NEW YEAR! ♦ Luigibob ♦ ^{"Talk to Luigi!"} 00:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

paul winfield

sorry for the undo....evidently nndb is persona non grata on wikipaedi these days. --emerson7 01:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of N. A. Diaman

A tag has been placed on N. A. Diaman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —BradV 18:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Three Stooges

Hi - not quite sure why you added the year of the film to all the Three Stooges entries, as Wikipedia policy is not to add the film year next to the film title if the title is linked to the main page or if you are already on the main page. I have undo all of the edits. Please check wikipedia policy first before doing massive edits of this nature.

Also, not sure why you relisted the name the Three Stooges as The Three Stooges, as it was properly linked first time around. These edits have been undone as well. You will see when you click on the latter entry, it has to redirect to the Three Stooges page.

Thanx.Oanabay04 (talk) 02:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deadly Illusions and stooges ted healy

How can that book prove mannix killed bern, reeves, healy and his wife beatrice?How good n reliable is the book?Indywisdom (talk) 00:53, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Beatific Vision (2008 film)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Beatific Vision (2008 film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MBisanz ^talk 04:46, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mitchell Leisen DVD box set mention at Midnight (1939 film)

In listing the set on the Midnight, apparently you misread the New York Times review, which mentioned separate DVD releases of Midnight and Easy Living but not a boxed set. Unless of course the review was revised since you saw it. I have these separate releases but have been unable to find any mention elsewhere of a Mitchell Leisen DVD box set, from Universal or anyone else. Signinstranger (talk) 21:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tulip Time: The Rise and Fall of the Trio Lescano

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tulip Time: The Rise and Fall of the Trio Lescano, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mayalld (talk) 14:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Tulip Time: The Rise and Fall of the Trio Lescano

I have nominated Tulip Time: The Rise and Fall of the Trio Lescano, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulip Time: The Rise and Fall of the Trio Lescano. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mayalld (talk) 14:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Tulip Time: The Rise and Fall of the Trio Lescano

A tag has been placed on Tulip Time: The Rise and Fall of the Trio Lescano, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mayalld (talk) 20:48, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback and advice

Hi Tjmayerinsf, I noticed you know a great deal about San Francisco. I wanted to ask you for some feedback and advice about a project I am working on about neighborhood in San Francisco. Thanks in advance. If you can, email me at ericwu01@gmail.com Ericwu01 (talk) 03:52, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanne Calment

Can you reference the below material?

In 1955, at the age of 80, Calment appeared in a behind-the-scenes short film Vincent Van Gogh: Darkness Into Light, made by MGM to promote Lust for Life (1956), based on the life of Vincent Van Gogh. In the film, she is introduced to star Kirk Douglas as someone who knew Van Gogh.

Thanks Ryoung122 13:29, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Beatific Vision (2008 film)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Beatific Vision (2008 film), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatific Vision (2008 film). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Schuym1 (talk) 23:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Beatific Vision (2008 film)

A tag has been placed on Beatific Vision (2008 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Becksguy (talk) 03:38, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Chiu (attorney)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of David Chiu (attorney), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://votedavidchiu.org/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SF Meetup #8

In the area? You're invited to
San Francisco Meetup # 8

	Date: November 8th, 2008
	Time: 2PM
	Place: Metacafe, Palo Alto, California
prev: Meetup 7 - next: Meetup 9

You received this invite because you added your name to the Invite list. If you don't wish to be invited any more, simply remove your name. Thanks. --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 18:23, 31 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]

DYK for Hank Wilson

On 18 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hank Wilson, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

~ User:Ameliorate! ^{(with the !) (talk)} 00:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

The template "fy" is the equivalent of "year in film". There's no need to remove it from articles. Ed Fitzgerald _{t / c} 07:16, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kismet

Will you be creating the Kismet (1920 film) article? E_dog95'^{Hi '} 06:43, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Kismet. Thank you. We have a hard time knowing what editors do without seeing any edit summaries. You are not the only person working on this project. Please help us understand what you are doing by communicating with us. You can find guidance and even a "how to" at WP:edit summary. E_dog95'^{Hi '} 06:58, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know you've heard this before, but...

...please don't forget to leave an edit summary! It only takes a second and it's good Wiki etiquette.

Thanks,

BMRR (talk) 01:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flywheel, Shyster, and Flywheel

Hi there. I'm working on the article for the radio show Flywheel, Shyster, and Flywheel, and on 8 February 2008 you edited it and said "According to Stefan Kanfer in his biography Groucho (2003), Harpo was paid a weekly salary for not appearing on the show." I woul like to eventually take this article to WP:FA and was wondering if you had the page number for a {{cite book}} reference. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 01:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was just wondering if you'd had a chance to look yet. Regards, Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 01:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it's much appreciated. What do you think of the changes so far? Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 05:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I don't check my email as often as I should. I just read your message you sent though, so thanks. Thank you for the encouraging words regarding Flywheel, Shyster, and Flywheel, too. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 23:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy 2009!

DYK for Nino Martini

On January 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nino Martini, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Arthur Nadel

A tag has been placed on Arthur Nadel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. manadude2 (talk) 23:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for working on th American operettas today. It's a neglected area in Wikipedia. Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the Hank Wilson article

hello: i found that hank died because the article you created links to one that i created. i dont live in sf anymore and although i am sad that he is gone, i am glad that i had the honor of knowing him. thank you for writing about this amazing man. badmachine (talk) 05:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WTTG

Hi Tj,

Thanks for your work on the DuMont programs list. However, I reverted your entry listing WTTG, as the following sentence states "These stations were not DuMont-owned stations but were affiliated with the network." adding WTTG to that list makes the statement false. Firsfron of Ronchester 23:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Supermodel

Tjmayerinsf, to add models such Carmen Dell'Orefice to the Supermodel article as supermodels, valid references are required. When valid references are not added, such models are removed from the article. Flyer22 (talk) 22:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen Walsh (money manager)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stephen Walsh (money manager), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Per BLP1E, not notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MBisanz ^talk 04:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Patricia Lake

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Patricia Lake. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Lake. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Patricia Lake

An article that you have been involved in editing, Patricia Lake, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Lake. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 01:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessessment of William March

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:William March/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anthrax War

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Anthrax War, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://infowars-shop.stores.yahoo.net/anthraxwardvd.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:19, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I appreciate that you made some efforts to paraphrase the text on Anthrax War so it would no longer be a copyright infringement. Unfortunately, adding synonyms and minor alterations in the sentences won't relieve the plagiarism issue. As it is currently written, the text will need to be deleted as a copyright violation. You are welcome to rewrite the text using original language. The page on WP:Close paraphrasing can provide you with some explanations and help. In the long run, it is always better to simply write the text from scratch using your own words. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Regards. The leftorium 22:30, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The New American Century

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The New American Century, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.informationliberation.com/print.php?id=26614. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anthrax Wars, New American Century, etc.

Please be aware that articles created without reliable sources are likely to be deleted; as are articles which seem to be promotional in nature. The producer of a film is not a reliable source because of the strong conflict of interest. There is no deadline for Wikipedia; we do not need to have an article in here for a film in time for that film's premiere, appearance at a film festival, etc. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The New American Century

I have nominated The New American Century, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The New American Century. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:44, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Heart of Stone (documentary film)

On October 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Heart of Stone (documentary film), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

So Why 10:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Art & Copy

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Art & Copy, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://blog.alonsocreative.com/articles/art-copy-a-film-by-doug-pray. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:49, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rebecca Welles

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Rebecca Welles. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Welles. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Jungle (1967 film)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Jungle (1967 film), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.documentarysite.com/blog/?tag=the-jungle. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright warning

Hi Tjmayerinsf. Please stop adding copyright violations to Wikipedia. You may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policies. If you have any questions, please leave them at my talkpage. Thank you. The leftorium 22:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia

Please note I removed the trivia that you added to the cast list of For the Love of Mike. While the information may indeed be correct, you have not provided a source to allow for verification of the information. Even if the information is sourced, it belongs in the article of the actor in question, not in an article related to a movie the actor appeared in. Jezebel'sPonyo^shhh 19:23, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SF Meetup #11

In the area? You're invited to
San Francisco Meetup # 11

	Date: Saturday, February 6th, 2010
	Time: 15:00 (3PM)
	Place: WMFoundation offices
prev: Meetup 10 - next: Meetup 12

This is posted to the groups by request. Please sign up on the Invite list for future announcements. Thanks. --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 23:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]

"Flowers of Asphalt"

I've reverted your recent additions regarding "Flowers of Asphalt" to Stephen Crane's article. While I'm equally interested in the possibility that such a story might have at some point existed, even in draft form, I think its dubious existence is enough to not include it in his article, which is currently Featured. Wertheim himself states that "no trace of the manuscript has been found", and seeing as how all we know about it comes from he-said, she-said, it doesn't really warrant mention alongside "The Open Boat" and Red Badge of Courage. Please also note that Crane died when he was 28, not 29 -- another user has already corrected your edit in that regard. Take care, María (habla conmigo) 04:12, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mike Jones (personal trainer)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mike Jones (personal trainer). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Jones (personal trainer). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DuMont

Hi Tjmayerinsf,

You've recently changed what the article Down You Go says without changing the source. Your new version states that the Museum of Broadcast Communications holds a copy of Down You Go, with a reference to this page, which does not list Down You Go. When you change information, you must cite your source for that content. What is the source for the material you've added? Firsfron of Ronchester 16:42, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 9/11 Film Festival

The article 9/11 Film Festival has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable, can't find any reliable sources reporting on this.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Prezbo (talk) 17:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you be so kind as to give us support!

Hello, I hope you're doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. I'm Claudi Balaguer, a member of a Catalan association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this hasn't been approved up to that moment. I know that you are also trying to obtain a Californian Chapter and I sincerely hope that you will succeed and I think that all the members of our association feel likewise because denying it implies, in my opinion, going against the spreading of knowledge creating boundaries to creativity and collective voluntary work. So maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: Wikimedia CAT. Supporting us will be like giving equal opportunity to minorized languages, cultures and local or regional entities in the future! Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care! I wish I could visit your great, beautiful and sunny region once more soon! If you ever need my (probably "our" too) help you can count on me even though I'm currently really far away from California. Capsot (talk) 15:49, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of CorporatocracyThis article could have been deleted as an expired PROD, but in view of its long history and number of contributors, and the fact that there are corresponding articles on a number of other Wikipedias, I have taken it to AfD to get more opinions. I am notifying you because you have contributed to the article. Your views are welcome at WP:Articles for deletion/Corporatocracy. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 13:45, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]Discussion inviteInvitation for objective participation in discussionAs a trusted editor on WP, you're invited to look at the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Cagney, Jr. and comment. Thank you. Monkeyzpop (talk) 21:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]TalkbackHello, Tjmayerinsf. You have new messages at Talk:Bjørn_Lomborg#Proposed_edit. Message added 12:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Trio LescanoHello, I write you about this article: Trio_Lescano. I see that you insert death data of Judith, in 2007 year...have you some reference about this? Thanks and regards, --Vito.vita (talk) 20:59, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] I got this info from the IMDB entry for Trio Lescano http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0503881/ Tom Mayer Tjmayerinsf (talk) 00:16, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]consensus with the proposed editPlease take a look at the edits I made on the List of conspiracy theories article to see if you agree with the edit or do not agree with the edit. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conspiracy_theories The comments are here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_conspiracy_theories&action=history More info on the subject is on my channel here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:64.120.47.10 The start of all this was to correct a untruth here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conspiracy_theories#Water_fluoridation Where the article says have found no association with adverse effects. The 2 sources I cited that challenge that are http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11571#toc and http://ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/08Mar/RL33280.pdf Please post on my channel if you agree and are in consensus with the proposed edit or not in consensus. The proposed edit is this. The 2006 National Research Council's report Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA's Standards and the 2008 CRS Report for Congress Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Review of Fluoridation and Regulation Issues did find associations to adverse health effects with fluoride in drinking water.[54] [55] This can be seen here in the water fluoridation section.http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_conspiracy_theories&oldid=40471025 Please disregard claims that may arise that I am blocked in this effort to seek consensus with the proposed edit as I am not blocked. Also please note that this information could also and should be added to the Water Fluoridation article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.120.47.10 (talk) 00:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]User:Freedom5000, it's just this IP of yours that wasn't blocked yet. Many others of your sock usernames and IPs have already been blocked. Now this IP just been blocked for 48 hours. -- Brangifer (talk) 01:59, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]AutopatrolledHello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:This permission does not give you any special status or authority Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove itIf you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]Carkner/BoogaardI reverted the edits you made to Matt Carkner's article because it seemed to me that your choice of wording was indirectly implicating Carkner in Boogaard's death, or at the very least implying that he had something to do with it. To be honest, I don't agree with mentioning that particular fight in the article at all, based strictly on relevance to the subject. Yes, in Boogaard's article it is completely relevant because it was his last NHL shift, but in Carkner's article I don't see any relevance at all; it was just a fight, no different from any other of dozens of fights he's had. Perhaps that's just my opinion, and you are more than welcome to discuss the changes you propose on the talk page and see what type of consensus can be reached. Thanks. Freshfighter9^talk 16:43, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]The Great American WiknicHi there! In the past, you've expressed an interest in local meetups of Wikipedians. Well, here's your chance! On Saturday, June 25, we'll be joining Wikipedians in cities all over the country for the first annual Great American Wiknic -- the picnic that anyone can edit! If this sounds fun, please add your name to the list: Wikipedia:Meetup/San Francisco/Wiknic and add that page to your watchlist. (And of course, feel free to edit that page with your ideas, questions, etc.) I look forward to wiknicking with you! -Pete (talk) 23:42, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]WikiProject Film/Avant-garde and experimental films task forceYou may or may not be aware, but there is a new task force out. It's the Avante-garde and experimental films task force! I saw that you made some edits to the article Experimental film, and I likewise felt you might be interested in joining the said task force. Well, anyway; come on over! You'd be more than welcome! Bravo! Alfa! Papa! 20:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]Leon DouglassOh wow, somebody cares about poor old Leon Douglass! That was my first article. Thank you :-) Yngvadottir (talk) 21:00, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]Film article ledesHi. Please stop separating paragraphs out of the lede in film articles into a new section "Production background". This material is invariably basic information about the film, and is better placed in the lede than elsewhere. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:18, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]Also, with films that very litle is known about, the "preservation status" should go into the lede and not into a separate section with one line of information. We're creating articles here, not checklists. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply] "See also" sections go before "Reference" sections, not after them. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:18, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply] I see that you have continued editing in this manner without responding to my concerns here. Please be aware that editors, even productive editors such as yourself, have been blocked from editing in the past for failure to communicate when problems have been brought to their attention. Kindly respond here to my comments. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply] Please do not add unsourced opinions, interpretation or analysis as you did in this edit. Straight=forward unadorned description, as in a plot synopsis, is OK, as it is supported by the film itself as a source, but any analysis, opinion or interpretation must be supported by a citation from a reliable source. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:30, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tom: Thank you very much for your note on my talk page, which I appreciated. I certainly understand that the contingencioes of Real Life take precedence over editing Wikipedia. Good luck with your family emergency, I hope all goes well. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:13, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DeSoto on FilmI happen to have a sandbox for DeSotos in popular culture. If you know of any films, TV shows, or whatever that contained DeSotos you can add it there instead. ----DanTD (talk) 17:43, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]New Page Patrol surveyNew page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Tjmayerinsf! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:39, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.Florence Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link to The Storm (film)Souls at Sea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link to Santa CatalinaIt's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.It Happened on Fifth Avenue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Allied ArtistsWhy Worry? (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to PatheWilliam Bakewell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Air CorpsIt's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Merry Christmas!Happy new year! We wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year! Pass a Method talk 20:27, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.Kick In (1931 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to PatheThoroughbreds Don't Cry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Words and MusicIt's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]The Dramatic Life of Abraham LincolnHello, Tjmayerinsf, and thank you for your contributions! An article you worked on The Dramatic Life of Abraham Lincoln, appears to be directly copied from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0014644/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted. It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on The Dramatic Life of Abraham Lincoln if necessary.Template:Z120 CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:24, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.A Lad from Old Ireland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to On locationFrank J. Marion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to On locationIt's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]Disambiguation link notificationHi. When you recently edited Kalem Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page On location (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.One Minute Please (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to John McCaffreyRichard Wiese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Endless LoveIt's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]San Francisco Women's History Month Edit-a-ThonSan Francisco Women's History Month Edit-a-Thon! Who should come? You should. Really. The San Francisco Women's History Month Edit-a-Thon will be held on Saturday, March 17, 2012 at the the Wikimedia Foundation offices in San Francisco! Participate in editing subjects about women's history and beyond! Workshops will also be hosted. New and experienced editors are welcome! We look forward to seeing you there!Disambiguation link notification for March 11Hi. When you recently edited Chicagoland Mystery Players, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Disambiguation link notification for March 18Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.Meet Your Congress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Public affairsStampede (1949 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Allied ArtistsIt's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]Smile!A smile for you You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.7.209 (talk) 14:06, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 637: / Line 637: @@
 It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 10:50, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
+== Smile! ==
+{{award2|image=smiley.png|size=100px|topic=A smile for you|text=You’ve just received a random act of kindness! [[Special:Contributions/66.87.7.209|66.87.7.209]] ([[User talk:66.87.7.209|talk]]) 14:06, 3 April 2012 (UTC)}}