User talk:StAnselm

Thanks for keeping an eye on this and other articles

Paraclete In ictu oculi (talk) 12:53, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Hear hear! (I second the previous speaker). --Kanovski (talk) 14:03, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for note on Daniel article. I was browsing & found obvious vandalism. Glad you are thorough. --Ancheta Wis (talk) 07:32, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

unsc membership

What is unclear? Some people might not understand why West Germany is not included in the list: the note answers them. Kevin McE (talk) 00:24, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring at Southern Baptist Convention

Your recent editing history at Southern Baptist Convention shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Novaseminary (talk) 02:01, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

There are already several photos there. And you were blocked recently for adding this photo to this article. Why go down that path again? Novaseminary (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

What's your problem? Why can't we just avoid each other rather than provoke each other? Novaseminary (talk) 02:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

John Hartnett (physicist)

If possible, pls. help with the article dedicated to John Hartnett (physicist) as it is nominated for deletion. Thanx--Stephfo (talk) 23:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page New Wine into Old Wineskins do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Glorification

Shouldn't Glorification and Glorification (theology) be merged into one article? I'll go with whatever you prefer. Editor2020 (talk) 18:11, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For a great contribution to the world of knowledge and it's preservation. Perhaps you would like to join us in an interesting editing project. Would love to hear from you, Noa F. editor@worldjewishheritage.org Nono-editing (talk) 19:21, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Wilhelm Busch AfD

Heh. I was just reading over the process for closing the AfD. Thanks for taking care of it anyway :)   — Jess· Δ♥ 00:34, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Jaya Ho

Orlady (talk) 16:21, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration request

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Scientific realism article and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration;
• Wikipedia:Arbitration guide.

Thanks,

Kusername (talk) 22:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation

Hello, StAnselm. I know you are already well aware of this, but in light of your recent edits to Rockefeller Institute and Conservative Christianity, I thought it might be helpful to you to provide a brief reminder about WP:FIXDABLINKS:

A code of honor for creating disambiguation pages is to fix all resulting mis-directed links.

Before moving an article to a qualified name (in order to create a disambiguation page at the base name, or to move an existing disambiguation page to that name), click on What links here to find all of the incoming links. Repair all of those incoming links to use the new article name.

Best wishes, R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Firstly, thank you for fixing links to Pelagius etc. on behalf of other editors who left loose ends. I tried to help with Conservative Christianity, but I'm not sure where the old content has gone. If it's been deleted by consensus then we probably need an expert to fix each link - and who better than a Saint? If any of the incoming redirects can point directly to one of the alternative meanings then that will speed things up, as links to that redirect may not need attention. Toolserver has an alternative list of incoming missives which may be in a more useful format. Meanwhile, I'll see how many of the Rockerfeller links I can fix. That should need less subject knowledge, as they seem to be mainly from University alumni. Certes (talk) 20:26, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

In ictu oculi

I'm making a last ditch attempt to reason with User:In ictu oculi before dispute resolution becomes necessary. Would you mind going to his talk page and contributing to the discussion? Thanks. - Lisa (talk - contribs) 00:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi StAnselm

I wasn't notified of this canvas, but don't have an enormous issue with it.

1. 01:00, 11 December 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:Zad68 ‎ (→In ictu oculi: new section) (top)
2. 00:55, 11 December 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:PiMaster3 ‎ (→In ictu oculi: new section) (top)
3. 00:54, 11 December 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:Kauffner ‎ (→In ictu oculi: new section) (top)
4. 00:53, 11 December 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:StAnselm ‎ (→In ictu oculi: new section) (top)
5. 00:53, 11 December 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:IZAK ‎ (→In ictu oculi: new section) (top)
6. 00:52, 11 December 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:Marecheth Ho'eElohuth ‎ (→In ictu oculi: new section) (top)
7. 00:52, 11 December 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:Debresser ‎ (→In ictu oculi: new section)
8. 00:52, 11 December 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:Jayjg ‎ (→In ictu oculi: new section)
9. 00:51, 11 December 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:Musashiaharon ‎ (→In ictu oculi: new section) (top)
10. 00:50, 11 December 2011 (diff | hist) User talk:Mzk1 ‎ (→In ictu oculi: new section) (top)

However like other editors I decide what goes on my Talk page, so with all respect I have moved it back to Lisa's. 03:42, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Nouthetic counseling

Hi StAnselm, I have noted your edits on the Nouthetic counseling article. They are appreciated. DonaldRichardSands (talk) 02:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Gaelic sports

I've got no problems with leaving the small text in the Draft table as 'gaelic football' instead of 'gaelic sports', but hypothetically I think we would be including hurlers under the GAA total rather than the 'other sports' total, should the Ó hAilpín situation ever again arise. Aspirex (talk) 09:23, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Vern Poythress

I tried editing the article that is about me, to bring it up-to-date about publications. Understandably, my edit resulted in a message to me as a user that there may be a conflict of interest! Well, yes. So, in fairness, some neutral editor needs to look at my additions. I am sorry that I don't know enough about wikipedia to do these additions properly. Vpoythress (talk) 01:24, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Christmas

Merry Christmas

History2007 (talk) 20:20, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

re: Cricketers who have taken five wickets on Test debut

No problem - and thanks for creating the category in the first place. I've started a couple of lists (this and this) - plan to do the rest over Christmas. Thanks again! Lugnuts (talk) 08:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Also, should the first list be titled "List of Indian..." or "List of India..."? Lugnuts (talk) 08:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! I spotted the category of India Test cricketers, and thought it might be the latter. Lugnuts (talk) 08:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Devotional literature

Hello User:StAnselm, I noticed that you were the creator of the article on devotional literature. There is a discussion occurring there at the moment. I just thought I would inform you. God bless, Anupam^Talk 09:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Why have you deleted it??

What are the negative things I've said in the User:EminamaDron/Venomfangx article?? If you believe so, message me describing why exactly, you deleted it and, list the statements (Direct copy and, paste) in which you deem to be negative! -(My profile) (talk) 02:16, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Attorney-General of Victoria (Australia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Walsh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Warragul

Hi. I have moved Warragul back to its undisambiguated name. Disambiguation is unnecessary for unique names - see WP:NCGN#Australia. If you still wish to unnecessarily disambiguate the article, I suggest using the WP:RM process. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 18:53, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Melbourne Meetup

Hi there. Just inviting you to the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 02:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)

Christian conservatism

Do you personally agree with the disambig or are you just enforcing an AfD? D O N D E groovily Talk to me 01:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello, StAnselm. You have new messages at Dondegroovily's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3RR

Your recent editing history at Conservative Christianity shows that you have violated the three-revert rule. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. It does not matter whether your version is right or not. Because you are an experienced and valued contributor, I am giving you the benefit of this warning rather than an immediate block. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 22:35, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zebbug (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

your recent comment

Do you realize you just told me I was entitled to !vote "keep" at an AfD discussion?  Unscintillating (talk) 02:37, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Humiliation of Christ

Helo StAnslem, thanks for your amazing work on my newest article - Humiliation of Christ. Just to say that I've added it to the DYK nominations and wondered if there was any more work you could do (It's fine if you can't; you are the true DYK author). Also, if you had time, could you nominate my article? Thanks JZCL (talk) 16:56, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Notable?

Thanks History2007 (talk) 23:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Is this guy notable? He wrote Just James: The Brother of Jesus in History and Tradition by John Painter 2005 ISBN 0567041913 that I used as a ref. If he is we can start a page (feel free to start it), else will just let it be. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 12:02, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Ok, so how much do you want to build the page? I can leave the image of a $100 bill on your talk page. History2007 (talk) 12:19, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, StAnselm. You have new messages at Wifione's talk page.
Message added 14:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wifione ^Message 14:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Robogals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marita (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Gospel

Hi, if you have time please. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

This is in breech of Wikipedia:Canvassing & WP:HOUND - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:31, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

That's nonsense, it's neither. Dougweller (talk) 10:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Presbyterian Theological College logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Presbyterian Theological College logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabbath Rest Advent Church

Hey StAnselm, I've added a URL for that German handbook you already signaled--I can read it, through the US Google Books I suppose. The salient facts from that (brief) entry are now summarized in the lead of the article, and I've pruned it in other places. Feel free to revisit the AfD if you can read the entry now. Drmies (talk) 03:12, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK

JZCL started Template:Did you know nominations/Humiliation of Christ and I added 3 refs, but the article probably needs some attention, pre DYK, if you want to look at it, given that I am in the midst of a long, long debate on another issue and do not have time. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 18:32, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

editing from IP?

Have you been editing from various IPs recently, like 202.124.74.36? Novaseminary (talk) 22:45, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Catholic moral theology Charles Joseph Rae Aspidoscelis Evan Gulbis Tower Rock Kookaburra Sport Nick Kruger Eden Theological Seminary Mark Cosgrove Leslie Roy Marston Fort Defiance (Illinois) Andrew Dung-Lac John C. Whitcomb Tim Coyle Surcomplex number Jeremy Smith (cricketer) Alex Doolan Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society Trinity Evangelical Divinity School

Cleanup Reformed Theological Seminary James White (theologian) Figtree High School Merge Theological definition (Catholicism) Jay E. Adams Living Stream Ministry Add Sources Darius the Mede Middletown studies Nigel Wikify Evangelical Anglican Church of America San Francisco Theological Seminary Sunny Singh Expand Aftermath of World War II Index of Catholic Church articles Waterford City (Parliament of Ireland constituency)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:32, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Al Garza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Concordia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Presbytery of Relief

It probably should be moved - and a lot more added. I cannot do it because Relief Church has some history. An administrator would have to. I have no idea which is the formal name, but Relief Church certainly seems more common. Aymatth2 (talk) 21:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Meetups

Hi there, I added the meetup notice because it was on the Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/Invite spam list. I'll remove them. Cheers. Steven Zhang ^{Join the DR army!} 23:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

February Melbourne Meetup

Hi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at the meetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-) SteveBot (talk) 23:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Cross Keys

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cross Keys, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. YBG (talk) 06:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC) YBG (talk) 06:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Robbins

Is Robbins notable enough for a page? He just showed up in Healing the blind near Jericho and has a link in Sayings of Jesus on the cross, etc. History2007 (talk) 04:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. History2007 (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Weed

I have e-mailed you the text of A Weed in the Church. Please tell FICredirect (talk · contribs) whether you think it is appropriate for Wikipedia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:12, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Thomas Horne (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solicitor-general (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nominations

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/William Carter (Tasmanian politician) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Horne (politician) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

New Article

Hi, I was just wondering if you new why there was not page called Foreknowledge of God on Wikipedia. I've looked and I don't think that there's anywhere it could redirect to. History2007 says he's not sure if it is part of predestination and suggested I ask you. Appreciate any thoughts. JZCL 18:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Just in case you don't hear it enough, thanks for all your disambiguation work. 04:38, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Mercersburg Theology Columbia Theological Seminary Jon Kelly Sunrise, Long Beach, California Avalon Independent School District Craig Farrell (politician) Elizabeth Street, Hobart Byzantine Catholic Seminary of SS. Cyril and Methodius Gossner Theological College United Faculty of Theology Drumstick (ice cream) Loraine Boettner Saint Tikhon's Orthodox Theological Seminary Bethany Lutheran Theological Seminary Tony Mulder Richard Gaffin Wartburg Theological Seminary Anna Leese United Theological College of the West Indies

Cleanup ISCSI Christian Theological Seminary Limited atonement Merge Imputed righteousness Repentance (theology) Apostle (Islam) Add Sources Logic Protestantism Dave Mustaine Wikify Shekinah Christian Training Center Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary William Kermode Expand Christopher D. Price List of Calvinist educational institutions Wenceslaus Hollar

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:48, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for William Carter (Tasmanian politician)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Simeon

Hi re. > I'm afraid you've got this all wrong. A simple google search came up with a Church of St. Simeon the Righteous and St. Anna the Prophetess. StAnselm (talk) 22:21, 4 March 2012 (UTC) That's probably a page someone has made translating following Wikipedia, since in Russian it is Церковь свв. правв. Симеона Богоприимца и Анны Пророчицы. No refs for Church of St. Simeon the Righteous and St. Anna the Prophetess in Google Books, the webpage you found was just someone's attempt to follow Wikipedia. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:10, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

In ictu oculi (talk) 23:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

And there is a Google Books result for "St. Simeon, the Righteous" here. StAnselm (talk) 23:24, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In that long string as a attempt at translation of the name of a Russian church/feast yes, but the name of the feast is of the God-Receiver, Theodochos, the extra occasional adjective "[righteous правв.] Simeon God-Receiver" is not part of the normal feast title nor church name either in Russian or English translation of Russian, this is just a bit of random noise in translation. Thanks for doing disam cleanup by the way, I was going to go back and search for more myself. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, I think we've ended up with the right result. Your page move was a good one. StAnselm (talk) 00:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

I would like to propose, or second, your suggested Method of Jesus' execution title for the T-shaped/crossbeam article. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:50, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Macarthur, New South Wales

Regarding this category, have your concerns been resolved regarding the formatting of the other categories in Category:Regions of New South Wales? I note that they have all gone through the nomination process and have been or are in the process of being renamed to match the corresponding article. So in your opinion would it now be OK to rename the category to Category:Macarthur (New South Wales) to match Macarthur (New South Wales). Whatever your response is, it would be great if you could post it at WP:CFDS, so the nomination can either be processed or shifted to a full CFD. Right now the nomination is just in limbo because you had objected to the speedy rename. Thanks so much, Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 21:13, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. We'll get them all processed so they all line up nicely. If the article names ever change, we can arrange to have the categories changed as well. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 21:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Thomas Horne (politician)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Page moves

I suggest you use WP:RM for controversial page moves. Moving Martha to Martha of Bethany was, in my opinion, a bad move. StAnselm (talk) 05:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

How do you figure? There's a ton of notable Marthas, how can one obscure biblical Martha be considered more notable than the rest of them? Even if she was (she isn't), it just doesn't make sense - consider Paul. The Paul page lists a bunch of Pauls... including the biblical Paul, who by any measure is more well-known than Martha of Bethany or any of the biblical Marthas. Please remember, wikipedia is for everyone, not just Christians.ArchieOof (talk) 05:11, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Clearly you spend a lot more time on wikipedia than I do, and your wiki-lawyering with regards to re-directing "Martha" to "Martha of Bethany" is a sign of a person who thinks they have the system down to the point where they can force their opinion onto others who aren't as wiki-savvy. However, since EVERY OTHER common name in wikipedia sends users to a name page, Martha is clearly no different, and was only an article about Martha of Bethany because no one noticed until a few days ago. There's absolutely no basis for sending a search for "Martha" to an obscure biblical figure, unless you're trying to use it as a means of "spreading the Gospel" I guess. Unfortunately, this isn't the appropriate place or method for your proselytizing.ArchieOof (talk) 05:26, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stay cool and try not to let your personal beliefs get in the way while editing. Thank you. ArchieOof (talk) 05:41, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

RM closed and alternative Talk:Dispute_about_Jesus'_execution_method

Hi. RM for ...method closed and new RM opened as Method of... per your suggestion. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Another one

How about this guy? Just a lecturer, but seems to know his material. History2007 (talk) 14:14, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Lurker at the Threshhold.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lurker at the Threshhold.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Arkham Horror Black Goat.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Arkham Horror Black Goat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Innsmouth Horror.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Innsmouth Horror.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Melbourne meetup

Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 05:04, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

David Southwick

Hi - a David Southwick article was written pre 2008 - can you please advise how can get that data and added to the David Southwick article you created? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.115.135.129 (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Smile!

A smile for you You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 66.87.0.60 (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Icthys

The section was deleted by an unnamed editor, almost surely vandalism, since the heading was left behind with no info.

The following section about the Queensland EU and the Nimbin Rock Festival is also unreferenced.

This is, however, the only history that we have for the revival. I have asked the man who was responsible for the revival at Sydney Uni to go through his nine large filing cabinets and find an appropriate reference, but he hasn't done so.

It should be returned, regardless, referenced or not, with the tag saying that it IS unreferenced. Otherwise there is no history. People are entitled to the info.

If you leave it stay, sooner or later someone from the EU may find the reference. If you remove it, no-one will.

There is a good case for removing material that is contentious, if it is unreferenced, but there is no case for removing appropriately-tagged uncontentious material that can be verufied, but hasn't been.

Amandajm (talk) 02:22, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

It is a big claim to make! The revival of the symbol was a brilliant promotional idea, by a very clever man. Look where it has gone! The student, John Diesendorf, went from Sydney to Queensland to do a Masters, and then back to Sydney to International House.

While the claim is "big", the revival had to come about somehow. You have no other explanation, because this is it. I will chase John some more for a reference.

In the meantime, if you are located in Sydney, you might be better positioned to track down the reference than I am. Amandajm (talk) 02:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Last Adam

I think you did the right thing to start that. It is so close to DYK, if you have time please just do it. Needs just a little more text. It deserves it. I am too busy now to even try.... But I can look for a good image of say a Pauline text... History2007 (talk) 16:19, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Matthew 5:17-48

Hi, any comments on Talk:Expounding_of_the_Law#AfD.3F? Thanks. History2007 (talk) 19:11, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Soccer -> Football ---Sydney based media

That text should have been sourced, but I do recall some intense discussion with the difference between Melbourne and Sydney based media coverage of the game being discussed, particularly from The Age and SMH, both from the same stable, but using very different naming conventions. Let's face it, football preferences and names do differ dramatically across the country. I won't revert your revert, but just wanted to point out that there was some logic behind what was there. It's now a little bit less informative. HiLo48 (talk) 08:01, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Presbyterian Church of Victoria

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Challies a reliable source?

Hey, just asking a question about the Challies source on the Real Marriage article. The reason I'd initially added the blog for Tim Challies is because he's a contributor to the Christian Post, which usually reposts all of his blogs on their website. If his blog isn't usable via his website, would it be usable via the Christian Post website? [1] I know that 99.9% of blogs are unusable, but I didn't know if this would be one of those rare exceptions or if it'd be usable when it's reposted via the Christian Post, which seems to be a frequent source here on Wikipedia. Either way, I'm good as there's still other sources on the page, but I'm more curious about this for future reference. If neither source is usable, it'd save a lot of cleanup time in the long run.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 17:24, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

• Thanks! I didn't even know that it had those types of blogs- I'm glad I asked! This will hopefully save a lot of cleanup later on down the line!Tokyogirl79 (talk) 03:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Conservative Christianity as a DAB

Hello, StAnselm. I initiated a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#Conservative Christianity that you should probably be involved in. I bumbled into the thing when editing the page Conservatism (disambiguation), but it seems clear to me that you know much more about Conservative Christianity – the page and the thing – than I do. Cheers, Cnilep (talk) 00:29, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Seeking your opinion

Hi, I have looked at God in Christianity and I think it can at best be described as "neglected". Although that has the fortunate implication that there is no contention or debate, the page seems to be suffering from pure neglect - images and templates thrown around at random, unsourced sections - and it is anyone's guess how correct the content may be.

Of course God's page gets viewed only 12,000 times a month (compared to over 600,000 for Johnny Depp) but that is still a key page for WikiProject Christianity and should be in much better shape. I have started a discussion on the talk page there, and your comments will be appreciated. I have also asked Esoglou and Jpacobb to comment so if you could discuss the issues together and suggest improvements, or even better improve the page that would be great. Thanks History2007 (talk) 14:09, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Message left at talk page

for the Australian politician's page (Cory Bernardi) - I am inviting you to respond.

THanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cursesonabauumy (talk • contribs) 18:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Warning: 3RR

Your recent editing history at Cory Bernardi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Cursesonabauumy (talk) 01:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Advice

Learn how to read English. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 22:23, 23 April 2012 (UTC)