Talk:Barack Obama

Obama's "Swiss ancestry"

Re [4]: "At the same time, Herren tracked down the 1692 baptism certificate for one Hans Gutknecht – Obama’s seventh-great grandfather on his mother’s side." - I don't think we're including every single country Obama's ancestors were born in. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Agreed. Though if President Obama mentioned it personally, it might be OK for him to be in that category here...--Somchai Sun (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

There are already too many ancestral categories. Nothing should be in this article that isn't biographically significant, and that includes ancestral categories. The exception is where such things have received extensive media coverage. -- Scjessey (talk) 14:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Obama skeet photo staged?

There is currently a Request for Comment at Talk:Browning Citori#RfC: Obama skeet photo staged? The question under discussion is: "The article contains a photo of President Obama firing a shotgun while shooting skeet. Should the caption say that the photo was staged or otherwise faked?" Interested editors are encouraged to join the discussion there (and not here, to keep the discussion all in one place). Thanks. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 20:35, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

I vote we close this new section on the basis that it is stupid. -- Scjessey (talk) 20:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

I never said it wasn't stupid. But it would actually be helpful if more editors would comment on the RfC. (For that matter, people can feel free to add that article to their watchlist.) — Mudwater ^(Talk) 21:55, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

The RfC has been closed, so we're good to go. Thanks to those who participated. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 00:31, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Stable version?

The box on this page is now nearly ~2 years old. I guess it just means "This is when the article was FA" status, but why it hasn't been updated since I have no idea. --Somchai Sun (talk) 17:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Benghazi

This article hardly says a lick about the people who died in Benghazi because of him. Someone please expand on this greatly. This is all over the news. There's only one sentence about Obamacare, too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.18.176.3 (talk) 01:17, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Obama is no more responsible for Benghazi than George W Bush was for 9/11, only far-right, unreliable sources disagree.--Somchai Sun (talk) 09:27, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

And FYI, "Obamacare" is the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as the Affordable Care Act. So please read the article again, with this in mind. Did you really not know the name of the law? Tvoz/talk 06:21, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2013

I wish to change Barrack Obamas photo to a more sophisticated one.

ABloodyTruth (talk) 05:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

 Not done: if you have one to suggest, and it's free of copyright, please identify it. --Stfg (talk) 10:11, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Parents' marriage: important info being overlooked

proposal has not gained consensus; further discussion appears to be unproductive
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The article, as it currently stands, overlooks two points about Obama's parents' marriage that are significant and notable: - They were married 6 months before he was born, indicating that the pregnancy was several months along at the time of the event, - There is no mention the societal attitude regarding interracial marriage at that time (1961). My effort toward a fix has been repeatedly reverted, with one reason presented being, "Wedlock was a big deal back at the time, sure, but not now in the 21st century". I see this as a mistake. Facts need to be placed into historical context for them to convey full meaning. Interracial marriage was illegal in many states at the time of his birth, and was not made legal until he was about to start 1st grade. This article has no mention of the word "interracial", let alone link to an article on the topic. Both points are significant factors in his parents' relationship, and this article will be improved by adding specific mention of these two facts. As it stands now, both facts can be derived from info that is given (dates and ancestry). But leaving out specific mention creates a vacuum that is akin to having the article not mention that Obama is the first black president, and then justifying such omission by saying something like, "this is the 21st century, and race isn't important". By leaving out these two points, we are failing to give proper context.--Tdadamemd (talk) 02:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC) So what? I fail to see how this relates to this article. We have articles for Barack Obama, Sr and Ann Dunham, his parents. As well as his early life and extended family. That's quite enough. Thanks. Dave Dial (talk) 04:07, 10 December 2013 (UTC) I would agree that there are many facts regarding BOsr&AnnDunham that belongs only in their respective articles, but parents divorcing makes for a significant impact on the life of a child and these are two factors that belong here in this article about BOII. Here is an example of how both points can be communicated painlessly: Proposed edit: "The interracial couple married six months prior to his birth on February 2, 1961, in Wailuku on Maui and separated when Obama's mother moved with their newborn son to Seattle, Washington, in late August 1961..." Current edit: "The couple married in Wailuku on Maui on February 2, 1961, and separated when Obama's mother moved with their newborn son to Seattle, Washington, in late August 1961..." Seven added words, that's all I'm suggesting here. I see those seven words to be strongly related to the article, doing a lot to help to communicate where Barack Obama came from and who he is today.--Tdadamemd (talk) 05:00, 10 December 2013 (UTC) For anyone who doesn't like hearing this from me, you can listen to Barack Obama himself discussing the importance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3nRBwlcE-0&t=11s "Look, when my parents got married in 1960-61, it would have been illegal for them to be married in a number of states in the South." Notice also that the year he first gives for his parents' marriage is 1960, when it can be expected that a lawyer with his level of intelligence would be perfectly aware that his parents got married in the same year that he was born in. While it is not our place to delve into the reasons why he did this, it is certainly our job to communicate the straight fact that he was born six months after his parents got married.--Tdadamemd (talk) 08:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC) It would give undue prominence to the American social mores of the time to state them matter-of-factly in Wikipedia's neutral voice, and putting them in full context is beyond the scope of this article, as they apply to every unmarried, divorced, or interracial couple from the era. - Wikidemon (talk) 13:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC) In addition, regarding "As it stands now, both facts can be derived from info that is given (dates and ancestry)", see WP:OR. We don't derive information, we use what Reliable Sources without giving undue weight to the information being added (a second problem I see with your suggestion). JoeSperrazza (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2013 (UTC) That is a distortion of what I meant in my use of the word "derived". I was not saying, "take Fact A along with Fact B and then synthesize Fact C". I was saying Birth Date - Marriage Date = 6 months. This HARDLY constitutes original research. Neither does, "observe photo of black father & white mother - now synthesize original research that this is an interracial relationship". Hello people, what we are discussing here are totally UNCONTESTED facts: the marriage was interracial and she was pregnant when she got married. No one disputes this. The issue at hand is whether or not the article would be improved by stating these facts. My position is 'yes'. My next post here will address this view that the edit would introduce undue weight/undue prominence. On the contrary, the proposal does not go far enough. The article would be improved by also stating explicity that the mother was 18 years old when she gave birth. (I know, more higher math involved here too.)--Tdadamemd (talk) 21:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC) No, this is absolutely what original research is. It is synthesis. Besides, we don't include anything in the article unless it has received significant coverage in reliable sources. Nobody is talking about either the interracial marriage or the day of conception because nobody cares. Back away from the dead horse, please. -- Scjessey (talk) 21:57, 10 December 2013 (UTC) I post a video with Barack Obama himself, expressing the importance in his own words, and there is a backlash from no less than three editors with the sentiment that it is not important enough for an article on Barack Obama. Somebody needs to tell him about this Wikipedia consensus, so he will stop talking about its importance.--Tdadamemd (talk) 22:18, 10 December 2013 (UTC) Show me a list of links to reliable mainstream media sources or scholarly works that demonstrate the significance of Obama's conception date and/or the significance of what society thought of this specific interracial marriage in relation to Obama's biography, and then maybe we can have a proper discussion. If you can't do that, let it go. -- Scjessey (talk) 22:27, 10 December 2013 (UTC) This very clearly looks like an attempt at synthesis. Anything mentioned about his parents relation should be supported by really good secondary sources. Not by inferences, innuendo or his own statements in random interviews.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 22:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC) Once again, we are discussing facts that are totally uncontested. If the problem is that the proposed edit is not citing sources, there are a wealth available. Here are just the first ones from a quick googling of books: How Obama Made It?: A Layman's Guide, by Young Sop Ahn Ann Dunham was only 17 years old... There she met Obama Sr... They married only a few months later in February, 1961. The parents on both sides objected to their marriage. At that time, racial discrimination was severe in the American continent, and inter-racial marriage was illegal and punished as a felony in almost half the mainland states. However, at the time of their wedding, Ann Dunham was already three months pregnant with Barack Obama, Jr. A comparison of John F. Kennedy and Barack Obama, by Natascha Drews 2.2.2 Obama's social background His parents met... A few months later, Ann Dunham was pregnant already, they married in 1961. At this time marriages between white and black Americans were forbidden in many other federal states of the United States. The Obama Question: A Progressive Perspective, by Gary Dorrien Classes began in late September. By November Ann was pregnant. A discrete wedding was held in February 1961, although there are no official records of it. Soon afterward Ann realized that her husband was already married and a father, with a second child by his first wife, Kezia, on the way. ... Obama was born in August 1961, by which time his parents' marriage was effectively over. Barack Obama in Hawai'i and Indonesia: The Making of a Global President, by Dinesh Sharma Probably unaware that most Kenyan men practice a form of polygamy, Ann Dunham remained in the dark during her brief marriage to Obama Sr. that he was already married and had a Kenyan son... "In Kenya, polygamy was (and still is) legal, and there is no limit to the number of wives a man can have. ..." ... When the news of their marriage, which took place on the island of Maui on February 2, 1961, reached the remote Kenyan village of... Ann Dunham was already two to three months pregnant. The Obama elders, especially Obama Sr.'s father, Hussein Onyango, refused to accept the marriage, for it did not follow the proper village customs, and most importantly, he did not want a white woman sullying the Obama blood (Obama 2004a). That last one give a reference of Obama himself, and here is that exact quote from the original: Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance, by Barack Obama ...my mother began to retell an old story... "... When the two of us got married, your grandparents weren't happy with the idea. ... Then Barack's father--your grandfather Hussein--wrote Gramps this long, nasty letter saying that he didn't approve of the marriage. He didn't want the Obama blood sullied by a white woman, he said. ... And there was a problem with your father's first wife... he had told me they were separated, but it was a village wedding, so there was no legal document that could show a divorce.... Then you were born, and we agreed that the three of us would return to Kenya... By this time Toot had become hysterical--she had read about the Mau-Mau rebellion in Kenya... and she was sure that I would have my head chopped off and you would be taken away." ... "We were so young, you know. I was younger than you are now. He was only a few years older than that." Barack Obama writes a book about his life, and in choosing the title he picks "...A Story of Race...", and you all freak out when I suggest inserting the word interracial as a single adjective to help describe his parents' marriage. There are a wealth of books written about Barack Obama, and the issues I have pointed to are addressed by a wealth of those book authors. Yet people here freak out as though I am making some crazed push into uncharted territory. Ok, let's say that no one here likes to read books. Just take a look at this webpage from Biography.com: http://www.biography.com/people/ann-dunham-434238 The very first sentence is: Ann Dunham (born November 29, 1942) met Kenyan national Barack Obama, Sr. while at the University of Hawaii and married him after she became pregnant. There are plenty other references available. I will go out on a limb with an estimate of hundreds. But so long as editors here prefer to keep their heads buried in the sand, there won't be a very bright outlook for an informed consensus on this.--Tdadamemd (talk) 23:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC) The point is not whether it is contested but whether it is relevant to draw specific attention to. The article already mentions both where his parents were from and when they where married and when he was born. User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 15:39, 11 December 2013 (UTC)You suggest that based on those data we Tdadamemd has suggested two edits: Adding the qualifier interracial to describe the marriage of Obama's parents, and, Adding that they were married "6 months before he was born". Regarding point 2, I've not yet seen (pardon me if I've missed it here) references to reliable sources noting the timing of their marriage and that it is significant to the subject of this biography. As others pointed out, just doing the math ourselves is Original Research - when reliable 3rd party sources offer significant coverage of that point, and note its significance to Mr. Obama, then it can be considered as an addition. Regarding point 1, there do seem to be adequate references that describe Obama's parent's marriage as an interracial one. I would propose this edit as being worthy of consideration: "The interracial couple married in Wailuku on Maui on February 2, 1961, and separated when Obama's mother moved with their newborn son to Seattle, Washington, in late August 1961..." Thanks, JoeSperrazza (talk) 12:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC) We shouldn't tag marriages between people of different races with the term "interracial". Attention to such things is a product old American prejudices, not biographical significance to the children, which makes it unencyclopedic. - Wikidemon (talk) 15:35, 11 December 2013 (UTC) Agreed. User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 15:39, 11 December 2013 (UTC) I am astounded by the level of willful ignorance expressed by the vocal majority here. No biographical significance to Barack Obama? When he tells you in his own words of the significance? When he has written a book of his life and the title itself focuses on the significance? Are any of you bothering to read the quotes provided? Barack Obama himself is telling us that there was fear that his mother was going to be murdered - have her head chopped off - and he would be taken away. Yeah, not much impact on his life there. All of the authors quoted above are writing about Barack Obama's life and they all are communicating the significance. I spent 10 seconds doing a google search, and just presented the first four hits. The question has become, How deeply do we want to bury our heads in the sand here? Take JoeSperrazza's reply, for instance: "I've not yet seen ... references to reliable sources noting the timing of their marriage..." One explanation, Joe, might be that you poked your eyes out before posting that reply. Here's what you are choosing to ignore: From 1st book cited- "at the time of their wedding, Ann Dunham was already three months pregnant with Barack Obama, Jr." From 2nd book cited- "Ann Dunham was pregnant already, they married in 1961" From 3rd book cited- "By November Ann was pregnant. A discrete wedding was held in February 1961" From 4th book cited- "Ann Dunham was already two to three months pregnant." Biography.com cite- "Ann Dunham...met Kenyan national Barack Obama, Sr. ...and married him after she became pregnant." If I had the technology, I would post these quotes in Braille, because there appears to be a blatant aversion to so much as a visual scan of the printed word here in this forum amongst those willing to speak up on this. You all are certainly free to continue to ignore everything I've provided, but it is perfectly clear what is important to all of these authors when writing about Barack Obama, and it is perfectly clear to me what belongs in this Wikipedia article. I'll highlight one more quote: But so long as editors here prefer to keep their heads buried in the sand, there won't be a very bright outlook for an informed consensus on this. --Tdadamemd, 23:19, 10 December 2013 At the time I had written that, I was not aware of the depth that this forum was capable of, but now that has become quite clear. I am not so much disappointed with the editors who have expressed their choice to ignore the wealth of info provided. My deepest disappointment is with the untold numbers of editors who are sitting back and choosing to remain silent on this. The racial aspect of Obama's parents' marriage isn't important enough to mention here? Nelson Mandela's body isn't turning in his grave, because it hasn't even been buried yet.--Tdadamemd (talk) 22:41, 12 December 2013 (UTC) Simple, relevant question. Was interracial marriage legal where and when his parents married? If it was, it's not really important to the article. HiLo48 (talk) 22:51, 12 December 2013 (UTC) His parents were married in the United States of America, and interracial marriage was a felony in parts of this country at the time, punishable by a prison sentence. Here's another simple question: Was it legal to be black and voted as president in 2008? If it was, then why does this article bother to mention the fact in sentence number one? Following your logic, we would purge the entire article of any mention of race. And we'd advise Obama to change the title of his book because "A Story of Race..." is not really important.--Tdadamemd (talk) 09:08, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Responding to earlier comments — maybe that's just a parting gripe, but insulting a whole group of people skeptical of your position is not a good way to convince them about it. Sure, there are a lot of things that are personally important, but unremarkable. Children get sick, they get into arguments, they face bullies, they have pets, they explore life, they have best friends and hobbies. They go out on dates, they have girlfriends and boyfriends, they get rejected. But these things, as influential and important as they are to the individual, are not biographically important because they are common and unremarkable. Sure, in a book-length biography you would mention some of these things to get a better sense of the person. But in a 2-4 page biography you have to choose what's noteworthy and what isn't. Is the fact that (shudder) the parents weren't married or they were of separate races at that level? That's a matter for editorial discretion here, and the argument is that interracial and unmarried couples isn't such an outrageous or uncommon thing that it's worth attention here. This concern isn't a denial of race or a refutation of racial progress, quite the opposite, it's saying that a couple of different races isn't such a crazy thing that we need to point it out as something strange or novel. - Wikidemon (talk) 00:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC) I did not see anyone being insulted. My post was questioning whether any of the people reply had actually read what they were replying to. And again in your reply now you are totally ignoring the viewpoint shared by those authors. Race was a thing. It was a huge thing. Ann's mom was concerned that her daughter was going to be beheaded for corrupting the gene pool. You are certainly free to dismiss anything you're presented with. But what you are advocating is counter to the decision that many Obama biographers have made. I might go so far as to assert all of them have made (all the one's I've read, at least). We are in definite agreement that editorial decisions will be distinctly different between a book of hundreds of pages versus a Wikipedia article. But notice that no one is advocating, "let's add a full chapter or two into this encyclopedia article". The proposal being discussed is regarding the insertion of a single word here, and a few words there.--Tdadamemd (talk) 09:08, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Congratulations to all those who have posted such thoughtful responses to a misguided suggestion, particularly Wikidemon's just-above comment (which should be indented with one less colon!). Discussions like this are generally pointless because there is no way to change the mind of someone who believes that "important info" includes whether one's parents may have been naughty. Probably just "say no" is about the best that can be achieved. Johnuniq (talk) 01:32, 13 December 2013 (UTC) This is not about parents being naughty. This is about an act that was a felony in the country of this marriage, punishable by prison all the way up through 1967. And this is about how the character of a marriage is distinctly different when the bride is three months pregnant at the wedding, versus not. And this is also about how getting pregnant as a 17 year old child (Ann Dunham's case) makes for a qualitatively different parenting experience. Inserting a few words to indicate these facts help give context to things that happened soon after in young Barack's life, such as why his parents got divorced, why she moved away from a country where interracial marriage was outlawed, and why Obama was raised mainly by his grandparents. If we decide to continue leaving those three points out of the article, then readers can easily miss important aspects of his story. One of the major impacts is that Barack became steadfast in his commitment to be a very different parent to his own children, as he explains in his book.--Tdadamemd (talk) 09:08, 13 December 2013 (UTC) New source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7An5LPXjOa4&t=2m40s Obama: "I'm the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas." The constraints of a news report are often a lot tighter than what Wikipedia editors face, and in this short NBC News report lasting only a few minutes, this point is highlighted not only a single time, but twice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7An5LPXjOa4&t=30s (same video) Reporter: "...an African man...and a white Kansan...wed at the dawn of the '60s, when interracial marriages were still illegal in many places." The racial aspect of the marriage isn't worth mentioning? To NBC News it was worth mentioning TWICE within the span of two minutes in a single short report - once from Obama's own mouth. This was in 2008, discussing his qualifications to become president, and the importance of his upbringing toward that end.--Tdadamemd (talk) 09:48, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Another video interviewing Obama: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mX_j89SoSQ&t=3m19s Reporter: "When his daughter said, "Dad, I'd like to marry a black man from Africa", how did he react?" Two things to note: - This question was asked, - This question was answered. So clearly ABC News belongs to the same camp as NBC News (report posted above) regarding the importance of this issue, along with the wealth of authors quoted here. And as with NBC, this ABC report also makes multiple mention within the same report as to the importance of Obama's interracial roots: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mX_j89SoSQ&t=7m53s (same video) Obama: "...race and ethnicity and religion... often times are presented as dividing lines... I have swam in those waters ...they're all part of one big river that is the American story." All of these sources point to a conclusion that we need to make it part of the Wikipedia story that we are choosing to present about him. This particular aspect can be fixed by inserting the single word "interracial". (Ok, y'all can freak out now about how adding these 11 letters will destroy the article.)--Tdadamemd (talk) 10:27, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Tdadamemd has provided ample evidence that reliable sources commonly have noted that his parents' interracial marriage was illegal in many US states at the time and that his mother was pregnant when they married. This is not original research. Reliable sources indicate it is important enough to include in the article. It is an important part of his biography. Edison (talk) 16:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC) I completely disagree. Tdsdamend has provided evidence that these issues were important to Barack Obama's parents (who have their own articles), but not to Barack Obama himself. I suppose one could consider adding them to Early life and career of Barack Obama to provide context, but in this summary style article they are not significant details. -- Scjessey (talk) 16:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC) I also disagree. Yes, it was illegal in some places; it was legal in other places. When we mention in the future (for example) a California-married couple from 2013, are we going to say "John Doe and Richard Rowe were married in 2013, when some parts of the US refused to recognize their marriage", even though thousands upon thousands of couples were married the same way? Unless it became important in their marriage (for example, if they tried to get divorced in Texas), it's not an important part of the story; for Obama's parents, mixed race marriage was not only legal in Hawaii, it was not particularly uncommon, and the fact that it was illegal in (say) Virginia had no bearing on the marriage or, as far as anyone can see, on the people involved. It's just a contextual historical point, notable in the discussion of the parents' relationship. --jpgordon::==( o ) 17:18, 13 December 2013 (UTC) One more source just posted below that says the exact opposite of what you are saying. See "extremely rare" (biography.com). Throughout this ENTIRE discussion, note the wealth of sources that I have posted to support my position. ...also note that NOT A SINGLE SOURCE has been provided in support of what you and many others here have entrenched their position to be. You are voicing your own personal biases, contrary to what so many of these authors and Barack Obama himself are telling you is highly relevant to the life of Barack Obama. And by "life", I don't mean "early life". Notice that the title of the books being quoted here are not "Early Life of Barack Obama", nor are they "Life of the Parents of Barack Obama". These are books (and interviews) about Obama's career, explaining the deep roots of how he became the person he is today - how and why he deserved to become elected president, etc. "The Making of a Global President", to quote from the title of one source. We have an encyclopedia article here about a person who is president, and we are choosing to skip a HUGE part of his story, when clearly many many authors and interviewers are NOT skipping that. Not only are they not skipping that, they are FOCUSING on these points. If any of you really believe that your position is the proper one for us to take here, how about supporting your position with so much as one single source? I'd be very interested to see such a beast, if it exists. If you are incapable of doing that (one possible explanation as to why it has not been done to date), then you might be forced to face a conclusion that you all have no solid ground to stand on. Here's the current standing regarding reliable sources used in this section: SOURCES IN FAVOR = 10, SOURCES SUPPORTING OPPOSE = 0 --Tdadamemd (talk) 21:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Tom Brokaw would like to weigh in with his own view here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lNGCN6d0Ss&t=33s Tom Brokaw: "But let's not forget that he's the product of a bi-racial marriage. That his father came from Kenya and married a woman from Kansas." This is not MSNBC doing a piece on the early life of Obama. That video is from a live feed of primary election coverage. And from the NBC News report posted above, here is Brian Williams explaining the importance and relevance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7An5LPXjOa4&t=7s Brian Williams: "Tonight it's Senator Barack Obama, who's made his life story and his upbringing a part of his campaign." Brokaw, Williams, Obama himself. Many many reliable sources that see these points to be so significant to his story that a strong argument could be made that this info not only belongs in the body of the article, but it also belongs in the lede. Scjessey and jpgordon, your comments come on the heels of that post of Obama's quote where he has clearly asserted that his mix of "race and ethnicity and religion" are part of what qualifies him to be the best candidate for president. (Just so we might all be clear on exactly what is being willfully ignored here.) Brokaw and Williams above are highlighting that message.--Tdadamemd (talk) 22:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC) I'm wilfully ignoring slabs of text from an obsessed editor. Right at the start, the lead of our article states that Obama is "the first African American" to be President. On the racial front, and especially because of America's past and now hopefully diminishing racist divides, that's what he will be remembered as being. That's enough. As for being a bastard, I know several. Most of them are great people. It's simply not an issue. HiLo48 (talk) 00:35, 14 December 2013 (UTC) HERE you are bringing up a very interesting point. I find this so interesting that I see it to merit its own sub-section here. I will start that.--Tdadamemd (talk) 04:32, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Earlier in this section, the text from the biography.com webpage was quoted. Well let's have a look at what their video program presented: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l89vsCdn-_0&t=4m27s Narrator: "In the early 1960's, interracial relationships were extremely rare, and in many states interracial marriage was illegal." That quote was from a program that fills an hour long tv spot. A common rebuttal here has become whether or not such info needs to be edited into a concise summary of Barack Obama. To help gain that perspective, rewind this exact same program to the very beginning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l89vsCdn-_0&t=14s "Barack was trying to struggle through issues of racial identity." "His mother was white. His grandparents were white. He wanted to fit into black culture." Biography.com lets you scratch their surface where after all of 14 seconds they start into a summary of the interracial nature of Obama's upbringing. That's not 14 seconds into their program even. That's just the intro to their program.--Tdadamemd (talk) 20:45, 13 December 2013 (UTC) This is starting to get more than a little obsessive. Clearly editors here have formed a consensus that your suggestions have merit, but are not really appropriate for this specific article. If you continue to insist your suggestions are incorporated despite the prevailing consensus, people are going to start thinking you are just being tendentious and ignore you. This article is specifically about Barack Obama, yet your suggestions are specifically about Barack Obama's parents. -- Scjessey (talk) 22:43, 13 December 2013 (UTC) It has recently been highlighted that the consensus view here is totally unsupported. It has been said that democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding on what to have for dinner. Well Wikipedia is not a democracy. What gets put into articles is based on what can be supported with reliable references. And until you, or anyone else on your side of this can provide even so much as one such source, the consensus view will remain unsubstantiated.--Tdadamemd (talk) 23:21, 13 December 2013 (UTC) So far you have posted walls of text to highlight two facts, at least one of which is glaringly obvious. No one has disputed the facts. However, not everything that is true warrants insertion in an article, and particularly for a complex page like this, additions need to be WP:DUE and must not involve WP:SYNTH. What reliable source has demonstrated that anything significant about Obama is due to the issue of exactly when he was born? What reliable source has demonstrated that anything significant about Obama is due to the issue of his heritage? A commentator says something about a "struggle through issues of racial identity", so what encyclopedic wording is proposed? Did Obama choose his career because of this struggle? Did this struggle actually have any effect? Johnuniq (talk) 23:39, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Here is a direct quote from WP:DUE: "Keep in mind that, in determining proper weight, we consider a viewpoint's prevalence in reliable sources, not its prevalence among Wikipedia editors or the general public." The proposal being discussed is not a minority viewpoint. It has repeatedly been show to be the mainstream viewpoint (ABC, NBC, BOII, etc). And this notion that the info is 'undue' for this main article, instead belonging to an article on Ann Dunham or the father does not have a single leg to stand on. Why? Notice that every single source provided is a source that is focused on the topic of Barack Obama. The quotes from biography.com, for example, were not taken from their episode on Ann Dunham. It was their program on Barack Obama, and they made this point in the opening seconds of their intro (their "lede", if you will). All of the books that have been quoted here are books on Barack Obama. Not a single book is a title on his grandparents' life, his dad's life, whatever. It's all about the person who is president. [edit: Note that "Dreams From My Father..." is a book by and about Barack Obama, the man who became president. It is not a book about the man who he interacted with for a single month of his entire life.] There is a HUGE disconnect that's been going on here where sources and the nature of these sources are being discarded. Either people here are simply not reading (nor watching) the sources, or for whatever reason they are choosing to persist in posting opinions that run fully contradictory to these wealth of sources while not posting so much as a single citation that might back up their view.--Tdadamemd (talk) 04:52, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Tonight I am deciding to take a break from posting about Barack Obama. I will have a look back here after a week has past to see what has developed. Curiously, there are people here who see me to be obsessive. One simple way to prove this to myself is to step back and stay quiet. But the bigger reason for my decision is because of the central position of the WPolicy quote that's been posted tonight - a direct quote from WP:DUE. There is no shortage of people here who appear to be passionate about the view that adding a short and simple mention of these facts would not be an improvement to this article. Yet the wealth of sources posted here (read 'all') support the understanding that the proposal will improve the article. One week seems to be plenty of time for anyone who cares to provide support for such a position to post it here. I will return to see how things develop, and then may take appropriate action in line with Wikipedia policy (or I may return to find that you all have done that yourselves).--Tdadamemd (talk) 06:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2013

date of birth 1095 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.12.234.4 (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Cool, my mother was born then. Good year. --Somchai Sun (talk) 17:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Yep. Perfect whether when they started that crusade too. 75.156.68.21 (talk) 04:51, 16 December 2013 (UTC)