Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
1 IP & 2 users left. rm Springreen (blocked indef by Materialscientist (ACB)).
Line 29: Line 29:
* {{IPvandal|72.10.156.114}} having been prevented from editing against consensus on [[Nostradamus]] - with rants in edit summaries - IP is now ranting on talk page. [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 01:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
* {{IPvandal|72.10.156.114}} having been prevented from editing against consensus on [[Nostradamus]] - with rants in edit summaries - IP is now ranting on talk page. [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 01:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
*{{vandal|Crowd Side}} – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Okay yes it is vandal only-but I also have the problem that I put up a sock puppet report for a obvious one then I realized there was an older account so I put one up with them and now it is in 2 that need to be merged.... [[User:Wgolf|Wgolf]] ([[User talk:Wgolf|talk]]) 03:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
*{{vandal|Crowd Side}} – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Okay yes it is vandal only-but I also have the problem that I put up a sock puppet report for a obvious one then I realized there was an older account so I put one up with them and now it is in 2 that need to be merged.... [[User:Wgolf|Wgolf]] ([[User talk:Wgolf|talk]]) 03:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
*{{Vandal|Wdford}} Deleted article contents of [[Historicity of Jesus]], and replaced it with "This is a disambiguation article" and a list of other WP pages.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historicity_of_Jesus&diff=627801126&oldid=627753412] I reverted, then {{Vandal|Robert McClenon}} reverted me.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Historicity_of_Jesus&diff=next&oldid=627845714] They are both experienced WP editors, and are gaming the system to get around [[WP:Deletion policy]]. (See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Historicity_of_Jesus#Alternative_to_Deletion]). I cannot revert again without starting an edit war. Please intervene. Requesting reversion and warnings only.[[User:Fearofreprisal|Fearofreprisal]] ([[User talk:Fearofreprisal|talk]]) 06:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:23, 2 October 2014

    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 13:07 on 11 July 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.




    Reports

    Bot-reported

    User-reported

    Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Preparing an article about himself is advertising, but not vandalism. Article is tagged for speedy deletion. A note in his user talk page explaining the issues with self-promotion and autobios should suffice. -- Alexf(talk) 00:05, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]