Jump to content

User talk:KGirlTrucker81: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Line 731: Line 731:


==Ronald McDonald==
==Ronald McDonald==
There is already a discussion already on the talk page about it. Check it out. [[Special:Contributions/174.192.17.245|174.192.17.245]] ([[User talk:174.192.17.245|talk]]) 22:14, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
There is already a discussion already started on the talk page about it. Check it out. [[Special:Contributions/174.192.17.245|174.192.17.245]] ([[User talk:174.192.17.245|talk]]) 22:14, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:14, 23 November 2016

Modifications to Ziad K. Abdelnour page

Hello KGirlTrucker81,

Thanks for your valuable suggestions and feedback about the modifications. As per your suggestions, we have gone through the WPSPAM, WPEXTERNALLINKS sections and removed unnecessary external links from the content.

It would be of great help if you can review the content and let us know your opinion on the same. Below is the content for your reference.

[Content starts here.]

Ziad K. Abdelnour From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Ziad K. Abdelnour is a Lebanese-born American investment banker and financier and activist on Lebanon-related issues. He is President & CEO of Blackhawk Partners, Inc., Founder & President of the Financial Policy Council and President & Founder of the U.S Committee for a Free Lebanon.[1][better source needed] Abdelnour is the son of Lebanese industrialist and former MP Khalil Abdelnour (1992-2000) and the nephew of former Lebanese mogul financier and MP Salem Abdelnour (1960-1964 and 1972-1992)[11]

Education[edit source] Abdelnour was born in Beirut, Lebanon.[2] He received a BS degree in Economics in 1982 from the American University of Beirut, and an MBA degree in finance from the Wharton School of Finance, University of Pennsylvania. [4] Activism[edit source] Abdelnour was a founding member of the United States Committee for A Free Lebanon, an immigrant association lobbying the United States government to oppose Syria's influence in Lebanon, supporting the Syria Accountability Act.[5] He supported the neoconservative Middle East Forum, co-authoring a Forum study whose signatories included later George W. Bush administration officials Paula Dobriansky and Douglas Feith.[6] Career[edit source] Following graduation Abdelnour worked as an investment banker at Drexel Burnham Lambert,[5] where he was a successful junk bond trader under Michael Milken.[2] In 2006 he founded his own investment company/private family office after a career on Wall Street trading physical commodities and advising and investing in privately held companies.[7][8][9] In 2011 he wrote Economic Warfare: Secrets of Wealth Creation in the Age of Welfare Politics, arguing that governments should focus on wealth creation, not job creation.[10] Abdelnour is a regular speaker[12][13] and prolific writer on wealth creation, physical commodities trading and Middle East geo-political analysis at industry conferences & TV outlets nationwide including but not limited to Freedom Fest, The Atlas Society, Fox News, Newsmax, and World Net Daily.


As of early 2016, Richtopia ranked Abdelnour as one of the 500 Most Influential CEOs in the World[3]

Books[edit source] • Abdelnour, Ziad (2011). Economic Warfare: Secrets of Wealth Creation in the Age of Welfare Politic. Wiley. ISBN 1118150120.

References[edit source]

  1. ^ "United States Committee for a Free Lebanon". Source Watch. sourcewatch.org. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
  2. ^ a b Landon Thomas Jr. (August 1, 2006). "From Lebanese- American Financiers, Differing Views on the Strife". The New York Times. Retrieved February 24, 2014.
  3. ^ "The Most Influential CEOs in the World". Richtopia - Retrieved June 5, 2016.
  4. ^ "Ziad K. Abdelnour". Middle East Radio Forum. Middle East Radio Forum. Retrieved 3 March 2015.
  5. ^ a b Amity Shlaes (September 30, 2002). "Freedom for Lebanon". Financial Times. Retrieved February 24, 2014.
  6. ^ "To Beirut with a Bullet: The Armchair Invasion of Ziad Abdelnour". New York Press. September 23, 2003. Archived from the original on April 18, 2009.
  7. ^ "About Us". Black Hawk Partners. Black Hawk Partners. Retrieved 25 February 2015. family office
  8. ^ "Blackhawk Partners and Golden Sea Ways sign a 200 Million Euros Partnership Agreement to Fund". issuu. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
  9. ^ "Economic Warfare: Secrets of Wealth Creation in the Age of Welfare Politics". wiley. wiley.com. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
  10. ^ Jones, Forrest; Martella, Ashley (December 1, 2011). "Abdelnour: Government Needs to Let Businesses Create Jobs". Moneynews. Newsmax.
  11. "Ziad Abdelnour". - Lebanese SA. Retrieved August 8, 2016.
  12. "Ziad Abdelnour". - Freedom Fest Las Vegas Conference. Retrieved July 8, 2016.
  13. "Ziad Abdelnour". - The Atlas Society Conference. Retrieved May 11, 2012.

[Content Ends here.]

We have removed the links to the websites and kept the links which are from the reliable sources. Please go through the content and let us know if there are any modifications. Thanks for your support and help.

Prasad0052 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prasad0052 (talk • contribs) 11:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes

Hi, just in case it is helpful to let you know, you probably accidentally accepted an edit. Gap9551 (talk) 04:44, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Gap9551: Oh, I thought it was not vandalism, just a mistake. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 17:14, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move request

Many thanks for completing my move request! :) 31.205.148.44 (talk) 19:29, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You welcome ;) KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 19:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of the article

KGirlTrucker81, I saw you asked to delete the article Kenny Nsumbu Mpaka because you didn't see any reference/ external links to a reliable source. Now you can take a look and will see references to reliable sources. Is it possible to cancel the deletion of this article?

I would like to thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MahemeneT (talk • contribs) 23:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the referencing for beginners tutorial if you need help on citing sources. But you'll have 7 days to fill the refs in the article before it gets deleted and feel free to remove the BLP PROD template yourself once you add them. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 01:31, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate 80

I have deleted the featured article review for the above article because FAR is designed to re-assess articles that are already featured not to promote articles that are not featured yet. The process you meant to use is at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates. However, I should warn you that the article will not be promoted in its current form because it does not meet Wikipedia:Featured article criteria. In particular, it contains unsourced paragraphs and is labeled for "citation needed" in at least one place. These are themselves sufficient grounds to decline featured status. Best wishes, DrKay (talk) 12:48, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry my mistake. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 13:37, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Interstate 90

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Interstate 90 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Imzadi1979 -- Imzadi1979 (talk) 15:00, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just note here, the article is far from passing GAN. The history section needs a major expansion, and the route description needs to be fully cited. Imzadi 1979 → 15:16, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For your prompt attention to edits to the "warez" page. And thank you for not holding a bias against IP editors. Cheers. Le Prof 73.211.138.148 (talk) 17:30, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You welcome. ;) KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 17:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fuller House

We had an edit conflict on the Fuller House article. Please review my edit (it wound up taking place immediately after yours.) If you think my approach gave the initial editor too much credit for good faith, please feel free to revert me. Thanks for all your good work on PC-protected pages. David in DC (talk) 18:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@David in DC: The IP editor didn't cite a source and that's why I reverted a GF edit without clicking rollback (AGF). KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 18:07, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your CSD nominations!

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
You deserve this as you have done awesome job in tagging new, fitting articles with CSD tags! Ilyushka88 | Talk! Contribs 19:40, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the barnstar! :) KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 20:29, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kidz_Bop

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kidz_Bop&diff=736327064&oldid=736326376

Hi, why did you revert this edit? Govindaharihari (talk) 20:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The IP editor removed content without explaining in the edit summary. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 20:32, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is not as far as I am aware a good excuse to revert a good faith contributors attempts at improving an article, on a simple investigation I quickly came to the conclusion that the edit was acceptable under wp:pending changes reviewing Govindaharihari (talk) 20:36, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just Need Help

Hi! Could you help me with the Adam Cleary page I am making? AC9900 (talk) 20:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your done by adding one ref to your BLP. If you want more questions, visit the Teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 20:17, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Indents

Hi. Just a reminder that when you're putting an indented comment in a numbered discussion, you need a # at the start. Otherwise, the numbering will restart at 1 when the next poster puts his/her comment in. I've added one for you at the NPP proposal thing to get my number right. BTW I haven't got any tidles (or other cats) on my keyboard. I do have ~ things which are called 'tildes'... 8-) Peridon (talk) 18:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, hehe. ;) KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 18:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Interstate 90

The article Interstate 90 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Interstate 90 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Imzadi1979 -- Imzadi1979 (talk) 22:02, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BLPPROD declined

I declined the BLPPROD you placed on Bo.D. Weevil: this is not a living person, but rather at fictional character who serves as a team mascot. Therefore BLPPROD does not apply. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, aplopgies that is my mistake but I thought was a living person. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 20:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tatiana Kumar

I'm sorry for editing too much on the page. Please help me find out more about the reference. Jourdan Ann (talk) 02:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Take the referencing for beginners tutorial if you need help on citing sources. You'll have 7 days to do it before it gets deleted. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 02:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Army

@KGirlTrucker81, the actual number of Bangladesh army is actually unknown,,but my wife (who works in the army) says that approximately the army has at least 300,000 members as of 2016 nearly 200,000 soldiers are being recruited. Search in google soldier recruitment in Bangladesh army.BanglarManush (talk) 10:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll have a look at it. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 10:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@BanglarManush: Results indcate nothing in here and I can't find RS for that. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 10:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing जेनेटिक इंजिनीअरींग, KGirlTrucker81.

Unfortunately Randeerjayasekara has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

This article is not in English. Also it has no citations and categories. Please translate it to English.

To reply, leave a comment on Randeerjayasekara's talk page. —Preceding undated comment added 16:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Randeerjayasekara: I listed at WP:PNT for other editors to translate it, and why did you unreviewed it? KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 16:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page watcher) @Randeerjayasekara: This was an improper unreview, as KGT had tagged the article. Please explain why you unreviewed the article, thank you -- samtar talk or stalk 16:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) Indeed. Although A WP:CSD#A7 from yours-truly has now made it difficult to tell one way or another Muffled Pocketed 16:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I have notfied the user to not patrol such. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 16:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good stuff. Muffled Pocketed 16:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry KGirlTrucker81, I just wanted to know how this reviewing process works and I thought that I was helping. Also I didn't know that I should have done over 200 edits in the main space to get qualified. I was also wondering how I got access to this process because I haven't done much edits here at English Wikipedia. Please review new pages below and help improve Wikipedia, I only read that sentence and began to review. So I'm sorry for the inconveniences occurred because of me. Thank you.---Randeer (talk) 17:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You only have 47 edits and 17 mainspace, read WP:NPP and consider doing RC patrol for vandalism instead. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 17:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Iniesta

Hi, I was wondering about this edit and how you could accept it? Qed237 (talk) 16:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they have no issues I think. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 16:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No issues? Are you serious? I have seen a lot of weird accepted edits and your answer does not make it better. Qed237 (talk) 18:46, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just my mistake if accepting any problematic IP edit. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 18:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes of course, if it happens a few times and not very often it is a mistake. If it happens to often, it is worse. Qed237 (talk) 19:00, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
An other problematic pending changes accepted here. Live updates are not to be accepted, no updates until matches finished. Qed237 (talk) 20:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Smith

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adam_Smith&diff=737474852&oldid=737143521 - hi, you accepted this pending edit. I have reverted it for discussion on the talkpage, Talk:Adam_Smith#Scottish_or_British please comment there is you want to - Govindaharihari (talk) 06:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed on abuse filters

Hi,

When i am trying to upload an image of cherukupalli mandal, wikipedia page is declining citing abuse filters. Please help me in this regard.

Thanks in advance Suryakranti (talk) 16:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Surya Kranthi[reply]

Although, those are false positives I think. If you want more questions, visit the teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spotting copyvio

Hallo, in St. Mary's Church Finedon which you tagged, the wording "this present church of ours" seems a good clue that the text may not have been written for Wikipedia but lifted from somewhere else - turns out to be a pure copyright violation of http://www.stmarysfinedon.co.uk/ (though the creating editor has the same name as the church webmaster, so may, or may not, actually own the copyright). It's worth checking a case like this: I googled the phrase "than any other building in Finedon" as something distinctive, and it found the goods. (Plus several other places where the same text had been recycled!) PamD 23:21, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A 'Latte' for you,

Thank you for reviewing the free marketing campaign of All American Environmental, IWJXB (talk) 01:39, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You welcome, and also, thanks for the latte! ;) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 01:44, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ORCP

Hello. I saw you recently contributed to a poll at WP:ORCP. Specifically, you suggest that someone "wait 4 more years" before applying at RfA again. You're certainly welcome to your opinions and to have your own RfA criteria, but telling someone to wait four years is pretty far outside of normal consensus. This could unnecessarily discourage someone to such a degree that they never try again. It's just something to think about. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: Well, just in my own suggestion but I'm not trying to discourage users out of adminship. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 09:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you notice

what happened with your tag at Christian Satin? I am thinking about adding something of the sort, but am not sure how to do it. Just thought you might like to know. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 01:39, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You added some refs to your BLP. Good work! :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes

Hi KGirlTrucker81, please be careful when approving edits that add images to articles. This edit that you accepted added a blatant copyright-violating image to the article. A quick Google image search of the image shows that is was copied from the associated movie poster. Thank you, --Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:27, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Per the first rule of WP:RVW#General criteria, are you checking the actual content being added and the source, and whether or not they comply with WP:BLP? this edit that you accepted did not, as the addition was a WP:POV and WP:SYN edit, trying to claim it was a "scandal" or "notorious" (POV language that does definitely require better sourcing and follow the principles of WP:YESPOV) Or did you just assume that it was OK merely because there was any source cited. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 05:31, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have informed this editor before about his doubtful acceptance of pending changes. Should we go as far as a discussion to see if the pending changes reviwer right should be removed? Qed237 (talk) 11:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tomas Gorny AfC

What is the unreliable source for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tomas_Gorny ? CerealKillerYum (talk) 02:43, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That one in his LinkedIn profile. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:30, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done and re-submitted. Please re-review if you could. CerealKillerYum (talk) 06:34, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Early Modern Britain

Hi, I've reverted your move of Portal:Early Modern Britain. The page was broken after the move because Special:PrefixIndex/Portal:Early Modern Britain (and their talks) were not moved. Please let me attempt to move the subpages to carry out the technical request. Thanks — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 01:25, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy M. Wang: Well, I don't have the page mover right to proceed it, I alopgize. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 01:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, thanks for helping at RM though :) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 01:35, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Manjari Makijany

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Manjari Makijany, which you proposed for deletion. I am leaving this message here to notify you about it. Reliable sources have been provided. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to it. Instead, feel free to list the article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now a notable person. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Cookies!

119.160.98.192 has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Thank you for reviewing the draft of Rolling Dream. If you're free please review Draft:Coffee at Laundromat and Draft:Murder of Samia Shahid as well.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks for the cookies IP! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

I misunderstood your AfC comment. I thought it asked for me to present the draft to DRV. I did and found out you already did that on the 17th. Thanks!

CerealKillerYum (talk) 11:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley You're welcome! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign-language articles

You can usually find out what language an article is in by feeding it, or a chunk of it, to Google translate, setting it to "Detect language". If you then add the language to the "notenglish" template, e.g. {{Not English|Spanish}}, the template when expanded on the article page includes a link to a Google translation, which is useful for reviewers. Machine translations are not good enough for articles, but are often enough to tell that an article can be speedy-tagged as A7 or A10 or G11, or PRODded. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:03, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

12:30:22, 23 September 2016 review of submission by Director at mitsom



We are new in editing the wikipedia content. Would you please tell me the steps / syntax in creating a wikipedia content? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Director at mitsom (talk • contribs) 12:30 23 September 2016 (UTC)

I know you're newbie here but I declined your AFC submission because it's not yet notable until there's signicant coverage in reilable sources. But if you want to learn about wiki's syntax, read WP:MOS. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:08, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Goodman (activist) page

Hi KGirlTrucker81, thanks for checking the article on Jerry Goodman. That draft was actually on an activist named Jerry Goodman, not the violinist described at Jerry Goodman. I moved it to article space as Jerry Goodman (activist). --Lange.lea (talk) 20:19, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, not the same person. :/ KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 21:48, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block whatever

It didn't really matter whether it was blank or a test. Either way it wasn't a valid submission, and it was an editor playing around. It is less problematic that they play around in AFC than in article space, because in article space they have to be speedied. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:26, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: I agree with you, but I think it is an test. It should been speedied as a test page if moved to the mainspace. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 21:33, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, and a blank page that is moved to mainspace can be speedied as no content. Either way. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:39, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hello, My IP got blocked (see User talk:115.167.70.196 and all the articles I created as drafts (accepted by you and SwisterTwister) are now deleted. This is wrong. It took time to create them and now they're gone which means I wasted my time. Please please please help me I don't do vandalism. Why would you delete accepted drafts. Please get the article back. Seriously this not good I'm really upset. I use a shared IP and I'm not responsible if someone vandalises Wikipedia. Please help me. I don't want my work deleted like this. I worked hard to create the articles. Please help me.--119.160.98.57 (talk) 19:49, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you been blocked as a checkuser comfirmed that your an IP sock of some user I think. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:23, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bates College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division III (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AFC review

Thanks for the speedy acceptance of "List of birds of Tennessee". I made in-line references as requested. However, I don't see either the need or the possibility for additional references as also requested - the list was taken directly from the primary source as referenced. Craigthebirder (talk) 21:25, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley You're welcome! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 22:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

অঙ্কুর মজুমদার

Please be sure to use Google to at least identify the the langugage and then decide if it should already be tagged for deletion, and to notify the the creator of the 'not English' tag. For more information please see WP:NPP#Foreign language pages (WP:Notenglish). If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:06, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but I may guess which language is it(Hindi, etc). KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 10:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The script is Devanagari but it's used by several languages in the northern Indian sub continent. If I remember rightly, Hindi and Punjabi are the main ones.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A note about AFC declines

I was on IRC and a helpee mentioned their declined page Draft:ATMIA. I see that you have declined based on a lack of inline citations. While it's not an official policy, the unofficial consensus between the AFC reviewers is that ilc should be used primarily for BLP drafts (since they must have inline citations). For businesses and other entities inline citations are not as vital (especially if they have good references). In addition (also unofficially) ilc could be used for "this draft is good enough but needs to have the refs in the body of the text" (again, a bit more for BLP articles). Cheers, Primefac (talk) 16:01, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, not that much inline ciations besides BLPs. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 17:13, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that lack of inline citations is not a valid reason to decline drafts at AFC except for BLP drafts (and a few other cases which almost never occur in drafts at AFC). Primefac is actually mistaken, the requirement is in fact backed up by policy, not merely "unofficial consensus", see WP:MINREF. Please take some time to review the AFC Reviewing instructions before you continue doing reviews. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Roger, thanks for the heads up. I was informed of the policy (way back in the day) but clearly didn't remember it being a policy. Learn something new every day! Primefac (talk) 00:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Primefac we even occasionally relearn something old too, I've clearly been a Wikipedian for far too long... :) Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 06:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

08:34:35, 3 October 2016 review of submission by Animech.79


Sir, This Time I have done a good amount studies and build up references as link to get this article validated. Yes I understand that being a beginner there are possibilities of format error and statement flaws, by the way I can improve it and correct with your valuable guidance to get my page "Nadelakar" Published.

This write-up would be significant to bring the efforts of the volumetrically largest community in the state of Kerala, India, which is being called as Thiyyar Warrior, so get this draft publicized is very important achievement in this world of information technology. Secondly this draft will not result in any community differences rather it will unite and teach each community of this place to respect each other. Ultimately the objective to show that human race is interconnected and the changes are just a matter of evolution.

May I kindly know the area of concerns, if any and let me know your inputs to get this published.

Per the declining reason, you may fix the format to get it improved. If you want more questions visit the teahouse. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:00, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Animech.79, I just declined your draft again. You have no references. Wikipedia is not a valid reference. Blogspot (and other blogs) are not valid references. You really need to add some, from independent reliable sources like newspapers and magazines.
Additionally, I am really struggling to get through the actual grammar and sentence structure of this draft. I strongly suggest you find someone to assist you in the actual prose, as it is very difficult to read in its current format.
Please do not resubmit your draft until these two issues have been fixed. I highly suggest reading through Your first article. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 00:24, 4 October 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)Template:Z163[reply]

Page mover granted

Hello, KGirlTrucker81. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, post here, or just let me know. Thank you, and happy editing! ~ Rob13Talk 13:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@BU Rob13: Thank you for the long-waited page mover request, I was going to crawl up to Widr for this right then you granted for me! Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:05, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zuggtmoy

It would be helpful if you actually explain and show the sources as well as why they are reliable, independent, secondary offer significant coverage. AfD is for discussing and we require participants to elaborate why they think an article should be kept. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I can't copy-paste the sources here because I'm editing here via Xbox one. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:54, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DKaufman

You reported a user for using (WMF) after their user name, but it seems that there is a typo in the report, because they don't seem to have a contribution history. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but is this represents an Foundation employee? KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Jason Pierce (Drummer)

Hello KGirlTrucker81, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jason Pierce (Drummer), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 09:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 12:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UAA

Greetings, KGirl. I wanted to drop by and say I greatly appreciate and thank you for your work at UAA. There is one thing I'd like to suggest. It says in the UAA instructions, Promotional violations require indisputable evidence. Do not report a username merely because it "looks" promotional. For there to be a violation, there must be edits or log entries that clearly link them to a particular company, organization, group, product, or website. I have seen you report seemingly promotional accounts from which no edits have been made, as I did when I started my now-major work at UAA.

I've found that some users with usernames that appear promotional do make constructive, non-promotional edits, and there are also some who do make promotional edits or pages, but there is no link between the contributions and the username. In these cases, I tend to leave the user a {{Uw-username}} (or, in the second case, {{Uw-coi-username}} if there appears to be a related COI) message, as I think that's probably the best thing to do. If a user with a seemingly promotional username has not yet edited, or if the username isn't blatantly promotional, it's best to wait until they edit.

Now, I have a feeling I may be doing this part wrong, so you may wish to ignore this, but when I come across a user with a username that appears promotional, and who creates a page about an organisation/group/website represented by the username, but the contributions indicate a mere COI rather than unambiguous promotion, I tend to leave the user a {{Uw-coi-username}} message, to let them know of the username and COI policies and give them a chance to get their account renamed or abandon it, rather than going straight to UAA and letting them get immediately blocked. In fact, I probably am doing it wrong, because in these cases, the usernames do still violate the username policy, as there is a direct link to the edits, and a soft block can take care of it while avoiding biting.

It would be helpful if you could take this approach in the future. Once again, thanks for your UAA work! Regards, Linguist 111 If you reply here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to the start of your message 13:14, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Linguist111: You welcome, and thanks for the advice! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 13:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Linguist111, just a thought regarding your last paragraph: I see a ton of promotional usernames via the IRC help chat, and even if they have created promotional stuff directly connected I still leave a warning on their talk page; 99% of the time they didn't even realize they were violating the guidelines. So I completely agree with you! Primefac (talk) 18:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]
@Primefac: Thanks. Glad to hear I'm not alone on that. I personally think that doing it that way is better for those who haven't edited promotionally. Blocking a user immediately without prior notice, even if it's a soft block, can be a bit bitey, because I fear it may deter them. Letting them know about the username policy and giving them a chance to adhere to it is better practice than drive-by blocking, which they could have avoided if they'd just known about the UNP. I didn't know there was a UNP when I first registered; I just wasn't interested in creating or dealing with articles about companies, or any other articles for that matter at the time.
One thing I also want to mention, being someone who reports to and clerks at UAA quite a lot, and finds and speedy-tags a lot of pages, is the speedy-tagging of newly-created pages about a company, under a matching username, that are not pure spam, but rather have a COI problem. Pages that are clearly spam and unencyclopedic (containing, for example, "At XYZ Company we only give you the best! Come and buy our products now!...") do meet CSD and can easily be speedied, with the creator blocked if necessary. But suppose that same user wrote an encyclopedic, descriptive, and well-sourced article with no flagrant promotion about the same company (e.g. "XYZ Company is a [whatever] company based in [place]. It was founded in [year] by [founder]...). I see many pages like this that don't look like pure spam speedy-tagged and deleted and their creators blocked in the presence of a username–article correlation, while that may not have happened had the person had a policy-compliant username. I have in the past speedy-tagged pages like that and I fear I've been bitey. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please add {{ping|Linguist111}} to the start of your message 19:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I'd meant to create a draft page for Master Chefs of France to work on later. Didn't mean to post it live. I thought new pages needed to go through an approval system? Anyways, thanks so much for taking it down for me. PumpkinKitten (talk) 16:23, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome but I'll suggest creating an draft via the articles for creation process and submitng your draft for review when you're finished so it won't be immediately deleted when you trying to create one. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 16:32, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:StudioEyeconic

A tag has been placed on your user page, User talk:StudioEyeconic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 20:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: This is only a talk page full of notices but I will decline the CSD. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The advertising has been redacted so not visible now. Theroadislong (talk) 20:22, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How Canadian women won gender equality wording that others now use

I noticed you put a deletion notice on the page How Canadian women won gender equality wording that others now use. If you made an AfD page for it, I'd vote for it to be deleted. I've never endorsed a deletion through the way you did it. I wouldn't exactly know how. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 11:59, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You only can have two prods: one nominated for it and one endorses it. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

?

At the top of your talk page, it says "KGirlTrucker81 does not mention criticism". Did you mean "does not mind criticism"? Or something else? I don't mind correcting that for you. :-) Patient Zerotalk 13:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to correct it yourself hehe ;) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:25, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A message from DRobertHelgeson (refactored from user page)

Was hoping you can help me with the page I was working on for Ronnie Madra. SO I have many links to articles on reliable refrences ie NYT, WSJ, Bloomberg, etc. How can I ensure they are all linking correctly in order to avoid deletion?

Thanks!

D

DRobertHelgeson (talk) 18:35, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(refactored from user page)

Yes, you provided reliable sources to your BLP. Great job! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:29, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

01:01:43, 14 October 2016 review of submission by Snaggy01


Please re-review my submission as external IMDB link you mentioned has been removed. Thank You

 Done. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 06:22, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:53:32, 14 October 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Mrousseau6588


Hello KGirlTrucker81,

When you reviewed my article, you left the comment "don't use social media as sources". Is that the only thing that is wrong with the article? And if I remove that, will it be okay?

Here is the article for reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mrousseau6588/sandbox/Matthew_Evan_Taylor

Thank you, Max

Mrousseau6588 (talk) 10:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and you removed it but unfortonitly Robert McCleon declined your sumission because of NPOV concerns. I highly suggest you read Your first article before making futher improvements. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 18:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Signature alterations

Hi, in this edit you altered a number of signatures. Did they violate WP:SIG in some way? --Redrose64 (talk) 20:57, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Redrose64: No, I think the user script EDH is always altering signtures when responding to edit requests. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 21:08, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's a redlink. Also, if it is a malfunctioning script, it should not be used until it is fixed. If it's not your script, please discuss with whoever you got it from. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:52, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Redrose64: Ok, I fixed the link for you. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 21:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

VelocityChess

Hello- which sources did you find unreliable? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etoya123 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think the blog reference used here as we don't use blogs as references. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 21:52, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I asked chessflash to remove his post as this is between us. Thanks. By the blog did you mean this one? http://www.thatvideogameblog.com/2016/06/01/velocitychess-partnered-zoomi-teach-become-chess-master/ Etoya123 (talk) 22:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 22:27, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think that video game blog is a pretty reputable source. How can we get other opinions? I also can remove it as a source if you really think it is unreliable Etoya123 (talk) 22:44, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs are not vaild references. See WP:RS. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 22:52, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, I thought Blogs can be valid references. Just because it is a blog doesn't automatically make it invalid. Maybe I'm wrong though, I am relatively new to this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blogs_as_sources
Etoya123 (talk) 01:34, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Etoya123, blogs can be valid references, but only in extremely limited circumstances. In all my time editing Wikipedia I have yet to see a blog meet said criteria (though I do recognize that it's huge and I've only edited probably 0.001% of all the articles). So... 99% of the time "blog=bad" as far as references go. As a note, the link you used is a failed proposal, i.e. it's not policy. Primefac (talk) 04:52, 16 October 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Ok I will remove. Thanks for your input guys. Etoya123 (talk) 14:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes

I cited information in Geostorm's infobox because an IP editor kept adding unsourced production companies. In [1] and [2], you accepted edits two edits from an IP. It's very sneaky disruption, and it looks like the edit is legit. However, if you check the source, you'll see that the IP editor is misrepresenting it – the information cited does not exist in the source. It often pays to be paranoid when you're working on PC1-protected articles if you're not aware of the original reason why they were protected. This IP editor's disruption is why the article was protected in the first place. If you continue to let the disruption through, I'll have to request semi-protection, because PC1 is obviously not working. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:33, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm iffy when reviewing changes without refs or anything with no source cited, but I usually reject them or just skip it. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 16:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your review of Draft:Juliette Ashby

Hi, when you reviewed Draft:Juliette Ashby you gave an invalid decline reason. All of the references in the draft are in fact inline citations. Please take care when selecting a decline reason from the menu, a slip of the mouse can easily result in a nonsensical message being delivered to the draft's author. I have reverted it.

Don't let the pressure of the backlog get to you, you are not responsible for it. Relax and take your time with each review. You might find it useful to have a printed copy of the AFC reviewing flowchart to refer to as you do reviews. Thanks for your contribution to AFC. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But that's my mistake here, but it don't have inline citations from the draft. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you may not see them, but they're there. Primefac (talk) 20:17, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello! I manage the social media for SHN and I am new to editing Wikipedia. We own and operate the [Orpheum Theatre] and the [Golden Gate Theatre] I wanted to remove the addresses, because we created new official Facebook pages for these venues here and here. However, our patrons keep checking in to the Wiki pages here and here, which have no affiliation with us. Because they have been checking in to the Wiki page, our official page has not shown up on Facebook. I have been in contact with Facebook support, and they are unable to merge our Wiki pages. So I would like to remove the address, so our patrons can check in to our official pages. Does that make sense? I can add the addresses in the body of the article. Thank you for your consideration. Cashew1021 (talk) 19:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)cashew1021[reply]

Hi there, it's okay to remove addresses but you must explain why on the edit summary box telling this should been removed. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Cashew1021, we have nothing to do with Facebook, and quite honestly changing our Wiki page isn't going to significantly affect Facebook or the pages people view. Additionally, we cannot be removing relevant information from a Wiki article simply because someone wants a mirror site to go down. Again, that is an issue with Facebook. I wish you luck. Primefac (talk) 19:58, 21 October 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

I completely understand. Thanks for your responses. Cashew1021 (talk) 20:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Cashew1021[reply]

Panax pseudo-ginseng

Hello,I am a Chinese.Nice to meet you.I am a beginner. Thank you for your criticisms.But I want to know why my Panax pseudo-ginseng was deleted? Can you explain more detailedly? I will feel grateful if you can alter it for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhangjunxing000 (talk • contribs) 05:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page already tagged for speedy deletion under promo grounds. Next time, try creating an draft verison via the articles for creation process and submiting your draft for review. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 10:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline Payback

My upload of "Me doing A Wind Foot Dance" is accepted and if you say "The submission has been declined", I would get mad! F! JohnStirk (talk) 13:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No is not, it seems to be a test that fall under the declining reason. It can be frustrating if your AFC submission gets declined. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 13:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:31:29, 23 October 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by AlexiaVassiliouMusic


Hello KGirlTrucker81. I received your message regarding the article "Alexia Vassiliou" that I submitted for review. I am not familiar with how the process of submitting on Wikipedia works 100%, and would like your help to get this up on Wikipedia, if possible... The person I am writing about is a well known singer/composer in Greece & Cyprus. She has a wikipedia page up in Greek (Aλέξια), but have translated it into English so that she can have one up on the english site. I read your comment regarding the advertisement, and I can rewrite that by including who mentioned some of the information vs just putting the reference, but is that the only thing wrong? Thanks again for your help. Valentina (Alexia Vassiliou Music (talk) 09:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC))[reply]


Alexia Vassiliou Music (talk) 09:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it must be in a netural, encyclopedic tone not in a promotional tone. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 09:50, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13:01:11, 23 October 2016 review of submission by AlexiaVassiliouMusic


Hello KGirlTrucker81, I am writing to you again, so you may see two messages from me regarding the page "Alexia Vassiliou". I went ahead and reworded some of the sentences to make it less advertisement like. Could you please let me know if this is OK, or do I need to rework it some more before I resubmit it. Also, I am trying to add Alexia's record labels in the side box in the beginning and I'm unable to. I see it in the edit box, but it will not transfer to the preview. Am I missing something? Thanks again! Valentina Alexia Vassiliou Music (talk) 13:01, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you can go ahead and resubmit but I'll do some copyediting. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 14:03, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted pending revisions...

This one. Its pretty certain that Noel Gallagher is not known for his ability to play the maraccas, digeridoo, harmonica & Cowbell. Regards, Only in death does duty end (talk) 09:06, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, he not tried to play any of those instruments above. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 05:54, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I am aware no :) This was probably petty vandalism, however its *possible* (but very unlikely) that Noel played those instruments once on a song (I'm not a huge Oasis or HFB fan). Infobox's for musicians however *only* include their main instrument/s. Not things they dabble in once or twice. The maraccas and harmonica are feasible but unlikely. Cowbell and Digiridoo? It takes years of practice to become a competant Digiridoo player and the sound it makes is hardly in keeping with Noel's musical style. Only in death does duty end (talk) 08:27, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:32:26, 26 October 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Greg8192


@KGirlTrucker81: Hi KGirlTrucker81, Thank you for your feedback on my Roseland Trust wikipedia article. Could you pinpoint to me on the specific red flags you were seeing in the article that sounded like advertisements. I want to make sure that I'm addressing all the sections that need to be revised and that all of them comply with the policies for the second submission. Thank you!Greg8192 (talk) 14:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC) Greg8192 (talk) 14:32, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One of your draft looks like in a promotional tone, so make sure you remove the tone use to comply with WP:NPOV. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 06:08, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21:55:05, 26 October 2016 review of submission by Mirandaga


I've added the references requested as best I can. I'm not sure if my attempt to re-submit was successful. If not, please advise. Mirandaga (talk) 21:55, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mirandaga, you have not resubmitted your draft. You need to click the "Resubmit" link found in the decline notice. As a note regarding references: you should not just link to the generic homepage of a source, but should link directly to the awards list itself. Additionally, the references you've given do not specifically talk about Berger. You should find more coverage specifically about him. What you have is fine, you just need more. Primefac (talk) 01:27, 27 October 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Nominating Doctor Strange for GA

Thank you for feeling the need to nominate Doctor Strange (film) for a Good Article. However, films that have not released, or are currently in theaters are NOT eligible to be nominated. Articles can be nominated once the box office has stabilized and is no longer changing. This article will be nominated again when this has happened. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:07, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 03:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
KGirlTrucker81, you will want to read the GA nomination instructions page before you nominate any further articles for GA. In particular, note that if you have not been a significant editor on the article, you should post to the article's talk page and check with the people who have put significant work into the article to see whether they think the article is ready to be nominated before you submit a nomination. In this case, you would have gotten the above response and known not to nominate it. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lili Darvas

Well I took the BLP prod off of Lili Darvas, if you read the article, it was not a living person. I did put a IMDB link as the EL, but she does need more refs and the article does need clean up. Wgolf (talk) 01:17, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, isn't he dead? KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 01:20, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like the person is-so its not a BLP then. Wgolf (talk) 01:24, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

article/ Sonya Bach

hello,

you proposed. that the article about Sonya Bach should be deleted. I agrre with now.What could I do to speed it up? Lulanep (talk) 07:05, 30 October 2016 (UTC) Lulanep, 20.10.2016, 08:05[reply]

PRODs can only last for seven days on the timestamp given. Sorry, there's no way to actually "speed it up". KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 10:10, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I see, when this article will be deleted?, Lulanep, 01.11.2016, 15:00 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lulanep (talk • contribs) 14:01, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Collision

It appears that you and I declined Draft:Ashok Sarma at the same time. Oh well. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It may have cause edit conflict or duplaticating decline notices probably for the AFC helper script. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:38, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:39:46, 31 October 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Greg8192


Hi KGirlTrucker81, Your feedback on my Roseland Trust article is much appreciated. Could you point out the specific sections of my article that need to be revised? For the second submission, I want to make sure no sections read like advertisements and all red flags are addressed. If you could provide specific guidance/tips for a successful second submission, it would be much appreciated. Thanks!Greg8192 (talk) 21:39, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Greg8192 (talk) 21:39, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just remove the promotional tone and make it more encyclpedic. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 06:24, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer granted

Hello KGirlTrucker81. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as mark pages as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

  • Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
  • Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 10:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:33:49, 4 November 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Alexgsd


Hi - thanks for the quick review! You rejected the article because of a citation reference to a blog. Is it citation 19 ("TMR Blog") that's of concern?

If so, I'm not entirely sure of the best way to handle this and could use some guidance. The cited page is from the site of a respected literary journal; they just happen to announce their contest results as blog posts. I.e., this is not some private individual's blog, but a solid organization's website that happens to include a blog.Is there an acceptable way to reference that page, or should I just reference the home page of their site (not as useful, since the visitor would have to then search their site to find the relevant info)?

Open to suggestions - many thanks. Alexgsd (talk) 21:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@KGirlTrucker81:

Alexgsd (talk) 21:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, using blogs as references is mostly no. Reliable sources are required for independent notability such as a newspaper review or news site reference. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 21:44, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the warm welcome and advice!

and cookies! Thank you. I'm still working on figuring out how to edit Wikipedia, and the links you gave me are very helpful. I hope you like virtual sweets! :) Diospireiro (talk) 01:19, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Smiley You're welcome! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 01:23, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

03:16:17, 5 November 2016 review of submission by Alexgsd


Per your advice that blogs are not acceptable in citations, I've substituted the Missouri Review main site URL for the link to their blog (in citation #19). A visitor could use their site's native search tool to locate the contest results being referenced in citation #19.

The draft you resubmited now been accepted. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 11:57, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for accepting the article, @KGirlTrucker81. Can you give me some guidance on why the article still has the warning "This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification"? I've cited references for every factual item I could (25 citations for a very short article). What more is expected here? Also, the article is not coming up in the primary Wikipedia search, though it appears in secondary results. Does that just take some time? Thanks as always! Alexgsd (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Maintenance template removal if you want help resloving article issues. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 20:25, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KGirlTrucker81, it looks like you reverted my removal of the maintenance template. I did read the article you suggested and am still a bit stumped as to what's required here. E.g., do I need citations for the year and place of birth, college graduation year, and residence in the Chicago area? Being new at this (as you've guessed...), I modeled my article on some other author articles, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Shepard. Those have similar biographical details, largely without citations, and don't display the maintenance warning. Can you guide me on how to resolve this? I'm sorry for the dumb questions...just getting oriented here and it's a bit overwhelming to say the least. Alexgsd (talk) 22:27, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unless the section is sourced, please don't remove it. The "find sources" inside the template will help you find a source. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 23:02, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you accept this revision?

Hi KGirlTrucker, hope you're having a great day. Thanks for your constructive criticism over at ORCP, however, on I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (UK series 16), you accepted this [3] revision, however, it was completely unsourced and unverifiable, so I unaccepted and reverted the edit. Was this a genuine error? Class455 (talk) 17:54, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is possbily unsourced but I mostly agreed with the change made. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 18:15, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The page was protected because of persistent addition unsourced content though. On that particular page, don't accept anything unless its backed up with a source, as most of the edits submitted (until the official lineup is released) are just rumours and gossip. Class455 (talk) 18:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10:36:15, 7 November 2016 review of submission by Christopher Mark Pattinson



How Do I edit the first section of the page. I can only edit from Science section?

See Wikipedia:How to edit a page if you need help on editing. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 12:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit notice

Hi KGirlTrucker81. I was just investigating your vandalism template and noticed a couple of typos in your edit notice. I've corrected them for you, hope you don't object. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 16:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, this should work. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 17:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accepting bad edits

Why did you accept this edit here? It was quite obvious vandalism.

Looking back through your talk page it would seem you have been questioned a number of times about accepting bad revisions on articles. If you don't have time to review edits properly, or aren't good at spotting vandalism, maybe accepting revisions isn't for you? --Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:Reviewing, PC reviewers don't take responlitblity regardless what they accept. They added unsourced content and may be vandalism. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 17:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Erm, just to clear up any confusion, you can decline revisions in which vandalism is present through PCR. I've seen a previous discussion here in which someone requested your PCR be revoked. I don't want that to have to happen, but it may well do if this continues. Patient Zerotalk 18:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but I already know what is vandalism is and is not but I don't want to get dragged to ANI, that was Qed237 who requested it but stale for now. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I know you do. I am not doubting that. But please, don't accept edits that are obvious vandalism, as it is essentially the same thing as ignoring vandalism when one spots it on an article (and I couldn't ever bring myself to do that). You could well end up at AN/I for this should your accepting of bad faith edits persist. Patient Zerotalk 13:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I came here because of a bad accepted edit as well. You recently accepted three edits on Simon Hopkinson that added a joke about Gavin Free. The entire reason that page is protected is because people keep adding jokes about Gavin Free, so accepting those edits completely undermines the protection. If you're not going to take the time to verify that an edit is not vandalism, then please do not accept the edit. Thanks, IagoQnsi (talk) 05:03, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you very much for what you wrote on my page. I'm not sure to know how everything work. But I will try to be more careful next time. Thank you !

AnhSe (talk) 19:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How sweet of you! :) Thanks! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:18, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@KGirlTrucker81: Good evening, Would you mind explaining me why the references I submitted were not reliable ? I'm not sure I understand why. Thank you. :) AnhSe (talk) 19:38, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because using social media as sources is mostly no. All information must be cited an reliable source such as a newspaper review or an book reference. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 19:48, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@KGirlTrucker81: Thank you very much for the explanation ! AnhSe (talk) 17:32, 14 November 2016 (UTC) Thank you for your patience. AnhSe (talk) 17:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting issues

Formatting issues are never a reason to decline a draft, as you did at Draft:Bharti Sharma Kshitij. If a perfectly valid draft is badly formatted, it should be fixed and accepted, not declined so that the creator (probably unfamiliar with the "proper" way of formatting") has to struggle through the process (and wait of resubmitting). There are a bunch of dropdown decline reasons, and the custom reason should only be used if it really doesn't fit any one of them (or if it breaks multiple decline reasons equally). Cheers, Primefac (talk) 15:51, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I thought formatting issues not a vaild reason to decline but thanks for the advice! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 17:23, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Azerbaijan at the 2016 IJF World Masters, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Peter Rehse (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@PRehse: Why did you unreviewed the page? KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 21:49, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mistake - I thought it was unreviewed.Peter Rehse (talk) 21:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's okay, we all make mistakes including me. Keep up the good work! :) KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 22:41, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13:08:08, 13 November 2016 review of submission by Kireadsalot




Hi

Thanks for reviewing my article. I do apologise for posting topic hastily. I am new to contributing. It is my first article. I do not know how to go about.

I also would like to post article on Christchurch Earthquqke.

Contributing to wiki is not the same as Facebook , Whatsapp. I need guidance to begin with. Could you please guide me with initial steps. I will take it from there onwards.

Thank you

Your draft has no references ethier, I highly suggest you read WP:Your first article before making further improvements. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 14:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. Will go through the link. Kireadsalot (talk) 14:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review needs your help

Hi KGirlTrucker81,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23:44:59, 16 November 2016 review of submission by Hray202


Hello, thank you for reviewing my submission for Kyle Cherek. Can you let me know which sources are not reliable so that I may revise? Again, thanks! Hray202 (talk) 23:44, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In my reviewer comment, YouTube is not an reilable source which you listed here. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 07:05, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tasty cookies!

Thanks for the welcome KGirlTrucker81! New to the wiki editing, lot to learn. :) JemSt0ne16 (talk) 02:45, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Smiley You're welcome! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 02:47, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, KGirlTrucker81. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald McDonald

There is already a discussion already started on the talk page about it. Check it out. 174.192.17.245 (talk) 22:14, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KGirlTrucker81&oldid=751183985"