User talk:Tkynerd: Difference between revisions
→Entries that need adding: Reply |
|||
Line 765: | Line 765: | ||
Hi, I am leaving a reminder to add those entries this weekend. Please do so as many editors said they would edit for me, but often didn't follow through. [[User:Davidgoodheart|Davidgoodheart]] ([[User talk:Davidgoodheart|talk]]) 19:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, I am leaving a reminder to add those entries this weekend. Please do so as many editors said they would edit for me, but often didn't follow through. [[User:Davidgoodheart|Davidgoodheart]] ([[User talk:Davidgoodheart|talk]]) 19:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC) |
||
@[[User:Davidgoodheart]] I wasn't able to do this this weekend, but I should be able to get it done this week. --[[User:Tkynerd|Tkynerd]] ([[User talk:Tkynerd#top|talk]]) 09:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:37, 28 October 2019
Signpost
6 November 2024 |
|
Link
Why must I have a disambiguated link? aṅgrej(ī) simply means "English", anything English, not specifically the English language. Tuncrypt 21:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Alright. It shall remain unlinked then. Tuncrypt 21:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
America
Hey thanks for supporting my attempt to get America to redirect to the United States. Unfortunately it just closed, with no consensus found. I guess this is site is slowly turning into the "Please-The-World" Wikipedia as opposed to the English Langage one. BH (Talk) 18:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- I just checked that link you put on my talk page. I don't know why people don't realize that this is an English language site. BH (Talk)
- You know I'm starting to think that one day we'll be forced into a debate over the use of the term "North America". I already see the argument being made that since Native American's were here first, we should use one of their names for the continent. BH (Talk) 14:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Good Point, that would make more sense since wikipedia is anti-US Imperialism. BH (Talk) 14:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
About "fixing" redirects
Hi Disavian, please read this: WP:Redirect#Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken. Thanks. --Tkynerd 21:44, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm aware of that page; however, I'm not doing it for performance reasons; I'm trying to clean up the Special:Whatlinkshere for Georgia Institute of Technology, a tool I've used a few times in order to expand related categories and articles. Is that a valid use for bypassing redirects? —Disavian (talk/contribs) 21:47, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Why are you trying to "clean up" incoming links for Georgia Institute of Technology? Articles, unlike dab pages, are supposed to have incoming links. I'm confused; enlighten me! :-) --Tkynerd 22:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- When using Special:Whatlinkshere, redirects that have links to them have those links pasted into that page. Right? For pages with redirects containing a significant number of links (ex: Georgia Tech), the Special:Whatlinkshere page doesn't follow the rules on how many links to list on a page, making link counting difficult. In addition, if a page links to both Georgia Tech and Georgia Institute of Technology, it will appear twice on the Special:Whatlinkshere for Georgia Institute of Technology. These are all minor complaints, I know, but it seems worth it to me to take care of these problems. Also, there is no "Georgia Tech University," so that one should *always* be bypassed. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 22:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Why are you trying to "clean up" incoming links for Georgia Institute of Technology? Articles, unlike dab pages, are supposed to have incoming links. I'm confused; enlighten me! :-) --Tkynerd 22:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:45, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 22:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the correction you made at East West University article. Niaz bd 05:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 10:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Djokovic Name Change
Do you find it at all discouraging or suspicious, as I do, that everyone opposing the Djokovic name change happens to be a Serbian national making the same fallacious argument ad infinitum? I'm fairly new to editing WP, but both the letter and the spirit of the policy are conclusively on our side here. Should we contact a mediator? -- Yano 22:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Isn't plotting against users fun and exciting? ;-) --GOD OF JUSTICE 04:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've requested mediation for the Djokovic article here: Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Novak Đoković and listed you as an involved party. -- Yano 05:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
You shouldn't thank me. We both know this is more trouble than it's worth. :-) -- Yano 04:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Request for Mediation
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
Reverting the deletion tag
Don't reinstate the deletion tag that was on Novak Djokovic. It says not to do so if it is removed -- which anyone can do for any reason whatsoever.
Also, avoid an edit war. It is undignified. -- Yano 03:56, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to suggest you were edit warring. No harm in warning against doing so, however, especially in these circumstances.
- Also I must say, your prose is the most brilliant I have read in a while. Too bad no one else will appreciate it. -- Yano 05:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- At this point, I am fairly content. In any other forum, our proof would have been considered conclusive. Indeed, had our position been the status quo, most courts would have dismissed any case against us without trial, the matter being so common-sense. I daresay logicians such as Bertrand Russell and Kant himself would have praised our logic and our eloquence in expressing it. (Tongue somewhere in cheek!)
- There is some truth to it, of course. While enforcement is outside our hands, that is no fault of our own. To our credit, every power alloted to us, as editors and as arguers, we handled well. What comes of it is outside our hands.
- As for me, being of a very judicious nature, it is less than ideal that I cannot enforce policy and reason once it is plainly and patiently explained. These circumstances will likely affect my desire to edit here in the future. For the time being, I will continue getting acquainted with things, hopefully to see if there are not arbitrators to whom we can submit judgment for common-sense matters such as these.
- What I have seen as an editor so far, however, is not as pleasant as what I saw as a reader. -- Yano 23:43, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
You are welcome...
Thank you for changing the link, there will no doubt be an article started regarding this. Cheers, --Bulleid Pacific 12:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Arbcom request filed
I've opened a request for the Novak Ðoković dispute at this location. Orderinchaos 08:04, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Suggestion for Wikipedia Cleaner
Hi,
I saw your suggestion for Wikipedia Cleaner. Before adding it, I just have a question about the situations where this feature should be available. --NicoV 21:53, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:59, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
Since you stated in the survey that "it annoys me that this prize is known as a Nobel Prize when it isn't one", could you please help explain to Vision Thing in Talk:Nobel Prize#Economics why the econ prize is not a Nobel Prize? It is currently included as one in the Nobel Prize article due to his edit and he is steadfast in his belief regardless of what evidence I present. Thanks! –panda 17:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Nobel Prize related articles
Could you comment about using "Nobel Prize in Economics" instead of the prize's official name in an article's content/template? I'm thinking specifically about:
- Template:Nobel Prize in Economics
- Template:Nobel Prize in Economics Laureates 1969-1975
- Template:Nobel Prize in Economics Laureates 1976-2000
- Template:Nobel Prize in Economics Laureates 2001-2025
Should the name of the prize in these templates be "Nobel Prize in Economics" instead of "Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel" (or "Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel")? The current argument for using "Nobel Prize in Economics" is that it is the common name. It's the same argument for using "Nobel Prize in Economics" in other articles. –panda 03:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- panda has initiated a discussion at Template_talk:Nobel_Prize_in_Economics. I think you are a pretty objective editor (despite my initial qualms). You might wish to participate. --Anthon.Eff 23:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- The article Semapedia has since been moved to Wikipedia:Semapedia. -- Ned Scott 03:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Duotang
I notice that you have edited Duotang. I'd be grateful if you could keep an eye on it because there is an anon IP address that keeps adding nonsensical unreferenced stories into it. Thanks. Hu (talk) 23:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've added it to my watchlist and will do the best I can, but I'm not confident that I'll be able to reliably identify the nonsensical edits very well, since I'm not that familiar with the subject matter (I only disambiguated a link in the article). But I do review edits to articles on my watchlist with popups, so maybe I'll be able to see stuff that doesn't make any sense. I'll particularly keep an eye out for anons on there. --Tkynerd (talk) 06:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- OK, now I feel a bit silly because I've reviewed the edit history, and I clearly see the unsourced nonsense that keeps getting added. I'll try to help keep it clear. --Tkynerd (talk) 06:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Rollback
Hello Tkynerd, I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. Acalamari 22:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- That's excellent, and you're welcome. :) Good luck. Acalamari 20:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
This edit was brought to my attention, as was the edit war on that page. Can you please explain why you used rollback on that edit? That's not the correct usage of rollback, as Allstarecho's edits weren't actually vandalism. Acalamari 16:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Well, as long as you plan to be more careful with rollback, and remember not to use it when in a dispute, you'll be fine. Acalamari 16:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's good to know. Thanks. Acalamari 19:13, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Mr Tkynerd please call it as Ram Sethu its a humble request, Hindu sentiments are at stake — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.229.236.247 (talk • contribs) (moved from user page to user talk page --Tkynerd (talk) 12:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC))
- It's anything but a humble request. Trying to dictate how speakers of another language should use that language is not "humble," it's incredibly arrogant. --Tkynerd (talk) 12:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Staten Island Railway
Hi Tim!
I notice that you have added the Staten Island Railway to the list of rapid transit systems. It has been discussed before, whether to include or not include this line. And I have started a new discussion at Talk:List of rapid transit systems#Staten Island Railway. Please leave a comment there! --Kildor (talk) 08:41, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- Hey you! Thanks, done. Sorry to have caused the trouble; I wasn't thinking about the criteria when I added it. --Tkynerd (talk) 18:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
check the weekends article
Check the weekends article. Is there anything different than what it should be? —Preceding unsigned comment added by SwitchbladeSam (talk • contribs) 19:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yep. Fixed. --Tkynerd (talk) 22:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Irish Legion
That was a handy wee tool you used there to fix those links. Thanks. Great job!GDD1000 (talk) 20:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Sorry
I always forget to add the English language link when I create these pages. I'll try and be sure to add it for the articles I create in the future. Jonas Poole (talk) 02:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
While DABing the Romanian page, I saw your note on this page. It seems that the intent of this page is to point to all the "peoples" of European countries. There appear to be articles for most of the "peoples" of Europe, i.e Romanians, Danish people, etc. Do you see any problem with changing the DAB page links in this template to the corresponding "peoples" articles? - Canglesea (talk) 03:07, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- That sounds excellent, thanks. When I looked at the template, I wasn't sure what the intent of all those links was, which was the reason for my note. By all means dab them, and they'll (finally!) stop showing up as incoming links on the dab pages I work on. Thanks, Tkynerd (talk) 04:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- I have copied our discussion over to the Template talk:Europe topic page to verify my understanding of the purpose of the template. If no objections, I will make the changes in the next few weeks.
Hi, I got a messgage from yourself saying that my article Stanley Street, Liverpool should not be deleted, but there is a deletion notice on it. Could you please help me, and remove the deletion notice from my article? (Richie wright1980 (talk) 01:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC))
- I did not argue that the article (and BTW, please see WP:OWN) should not be deleted, but that it did not qualify for speedy deletion. There is now a discussion about deleting it, linked from the template on the article page. Please make your voice heard in that discussion. You may also find Wikipedia:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! helpful. --Tkynerd (talk) 04:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Consensus is required for both the removal and addition of content. The section you put back was added without discussion 4 days ago. I didn't see you protest the major change that time. Note that the anon who added it, did the same on 21 June, when it's need was questioned by User:Lazylaces and was removed by User:Dudesleeper. --Atlan (talk) 10:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- Not entirely conceding your point. Major additions should reach consensus on whether they're to be kept if they are questioned; major deletions should always be discussed first. In any case, the appropriate place for this discussion is at Talk:Leave It to Beaver, not here. Finally, it's not my responsibility to monitor every page on my watchlist for every change that's made, and your imputation of responsibility is ridiculous. --Tkynerd (talk) 18:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I didn't mean to imply that that's your responsibility, sorry about the confusion. I just wanted to inform you that the section was a recent addition, which was already deleted a few months ago. I thought you might have missed that. Yes, the appropriate place to discuss this is the article talk page, but I doubt it will attract more editors than just you and me.--Atlan (talk) 23:51, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
- It already has. :) Thanks for the clarification. --Tkynerd (talk) 17:54, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Re: Germans
Sorry, but I'm not entirely sure. I've tried to look in the page histories, but I can't seem to find it. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:24, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey y'all!
We're going to be having our first Mississippi meetup next month, and I would love it if you'd like to come out! A few of us will be staying overnight, so if you feel up to it, we could have a meet and greet that night and then breakfast the next morning and talk about Wikipedia and everyone's areas of expertise. Let's show 'em how it's done Southern-style! Mike H. Fierce! 21:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
ucla
why do you keep deleting my changes to the establishment of ucla? i have researched the topic at great length and it seems pretty clear that 1881, is the correct date, given that the state normal school was changed to the southern branch of the UC. please compare this history of Ariz State, SDSU, SJSU, SFSU and chico state, and you will see they are all former normal schools and trace their establishment to the creation of the normal school. same thing should be true with ucla. also, take a look at the history of the outlook, the forerunner of the daily bruin; and the history of the ucla's graduate school of education - both trace their roots to the los angeles state normal school
regards,anderskw Anderskw (talk) 00:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
Re:Thanks..
No worries mate, if you want you can request semi-protection of your userpage. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 16:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
THANKS! from Mike S. (Re: Austin Bay)
Just FYI, today I finally saw your helpful reply, to my comments at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Austin_Bay, and I responded there. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 19:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I think my IP is shared.
sorry about that chap, i believe my IP adress is shared. those edits were not mine.
hello
can u help me with formatting and uploading photos? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shathedog (talk • contribs) 07:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
RE: America
Hey there. Thanks for pointing this out. It just appears unusual to me in this instance, as if someone was insinuating a flourish. Ah well. :) Bosonic dressing (talk) 16:46, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
Do you have time to peek at Malaysia–Sweden relations, a little help finding sources would help, or if you know of anyone else with good research skills with Swedish source material. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 13:23, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Chips
Thanks for your comment on the Talk:French fries page. You title your comment "Strong Oppose", but the content of your comment appears to say the opposite. The proposal is that the Chips article (covering the U.K. definition of chips) should be merged into the United Kingdom section of the French fries article. Strong Oppose means that you want to keep a separate (U.K.) Chips article. I think you meant Strong Support. --macrakis (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hey! Thanks for your comment. :) Actually I'm in favor of the status quo, so I oppose the merge. Currently there is no Chips article -- it's a redirect -- and that's what I want to keep. --Tkynerd (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- In the status quo, the merge has already happened -- confusing, I know. "Strong Oppose" means that you want a separate UK Chips article. --macrakis (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- That takes us beyond "confusing" and into the realm of "stupid." Why are we having a discussion on something that's already happened? Anyway, I will clarify my position...thank you for clarifying the discussion for me! :) --Tkynerd (talk) 22:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- In the status quo, the merge has already happened -- confusing, I know. "Strong Oppose" means that you want a separate UK Chips article. --macrakis (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Adjectivals and demonyms for countries and nations
As a contributor to the article, you may wish to comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adjectivals and demonyms for countries and nations (2nd nomination).
—Wavelength (talk) 02:16, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikimedia DC Annual Meeting and more!
Hello, fellow Wikipedian!
I am excited to announce the upcoming Wikimedia DC Annual Meeting at the National Archives! We'll have free lunch, an introduction by Archivist of the United States David Ferriero, and a discussion featuring Ed Summers, the creator of CongressEdits. Join your fellow DC-area Wikipedians on Saturday, October 18 from 12 to 4:30 PM. RSVP today!
Also coming up we have the Human Origins edit-a-thon on October 17 and the WikiSalon on October 22. Hope to see you at our upcoming events!
Best,
(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 08:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
End-of-the-year meetups
Hello,
You're invited to the end-of-the-year meetup at Busboys and Poets on Sunday, December 14 at 6 PM. There is Wi-Fi, so bring your computer if you want!
You are also invited to our WikiSalon on Thursday, December 18 at 7 PM.
Hope to see you at our upcoming events!
Best,
(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 02:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Museum hacks and museum edits
Hello there!
Upcoming events:
- February 6–8: The third annual ArtBytes Hackathon at the Walters Art Museum! This year Wikimedia DC is partnering with the Walters for a hack-a-thon at the intersection of art and technology, and I would like to see Wikimedia well represented.
- February 11: The monthly WikiSalon, same place as usual. RSVP on Meetup or just show up!
- February 15: Wiki Loves Small Museums in Ocean City. Mary Mark Ockerbloom, with support from Wikimedia DC, will be leading a workshop at the Small Museum Association Conference on how they can contribute to Wikipedia. Tons of representatives from GLAM institutions will be present, and we are looking for volunteers. If you would like to help out, check out "Information for Volunteers".
I am also pleased to announce events for Wikimedia DC Black History Month with Howard University and NPR. Details on those events soon.
If you have any questions or have any requests, please email me at james.harewikimediadc.org.
See you there! – James Hare
(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 03:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Wikimedia DC celebrates Black History Month, and more!
Hello again!
Not even a week ago I sent out a message talking about upcoming events in DC. Guess what? There are more events coming up in February.
First, as a reminder, there is a WikiSalon on February 11 (RSVP here or just show up) and Wiki Loves Small Museums at the Small Museum Association Conference on February 15 (more information here).
Now, I am very pleased to announce:
- Tuesday, February 17 from 10 AM to 3 PM there will be #WikiTurgy at the University of Maryland. Join fellow theatre enthusiasts for a “mass act of public dramaturgy!”
- Thursday, February 19 from 10 AM to 4 PM we are hosting the Howard University Black History Edit-a-Thon. We are working in partnership with the Moorland-Spingarn Research Center to improve Wikipedia’s coverage of African-American and African diasporic history.
- Tuesday, February 24 from 6 PM to 8 PM we have the Black History Month “First Edit” at NPR. Help improve Wikipedia and help others make their first edit to Wikipedia!
- Finally, our monthly dinner meetup is on Saturday, February 28.
There is going to be a lot going on, and I hope you can come to some of the events!
If you have any questions or need any special accommodations, please let me know.
Regards,
(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 18:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Editing for Women's History in March
Hello,
I am very excited to announce this month’s events, focused on Women’s History Month:
- Sunday, March 8: Women in the Arts 2015 Edit-a-thon – 10 AM to 4 PM
- Women in the Arts and ArtAndFeminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon at the National Museum of Women in the Arts. Free coffee and lunch served!
- More information • RSVP on Meetup
- Wednesday, March 11: March WikiSalon – 7 PM to 9 PM
- An evening gathering with free-flowing conversation and free pizza.
- More information • RSVP on Meetup (or just show up!)
- Friday, March 13: NIH Women's History Month Edit-a-Thon – 9 AM to 4 PM
- In honor of Women’s History Month, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is organizing and hosting an edit-a-thon to improve coverage of women in science in Wikipedia. Free coffee and lunch served!
- More information • RSVP on Meetup
- Saturday, March 21: Women in STEM Edit-a-Thon at DCPL – 12 PM
- Celebrate Women's History Month by building, editing, and expanding articles about women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields during DC Public Library's first full-day edit-a-thon.
- More information • RSVP on Meetup
- Friday, March 27: She Blinded Me with Science, Part III – 10 AM to 4 PM
- Smithsonian Institution Archives Groundbreaking Women in Science Wikipedia Edit-a-thon. Free lunch courtesy of Wikimedia DC!
- More information • RSVP on Meetup
- Saturday, March 28: March Dinner Meetup – 6 PM
- Dinner and drinks with your fellow Wikipedians!
- More information • RSVP on Meetup
Hope you can make it to an event! If you have any questions or require any special accommodations, please let me know.
Thanks,
To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list. 02:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Upcoming attractions in DC
Hello!
Here are some upcoming DC meetups in April and May:
- Tuesday, April 14: National Archives Hackathon on Wikipedia Space with American University – 2:30-5pm
- See the latest work on the Wikipedia Space exhibit in the new NARA Innovation Hub and brainstorm on new ideas for a public exhibit about Wikipedia
- Friday, April 17: Women in Tech Edit-a-thon with Tech LadyMafia – 5-9pm
- Team up with Tech LadyMafia to improve Wikipedia content on women in the history of technology.
- Saturday, April 25: April Dinner Meetup – 6 PM
- Dinner and drinks with your fellow Wikipedians!
- Friday, May 1: International Labour Day Edit-a-Thon – 1:30 PM to 4:30 PM
- An edit-a-thon at the University of Maryland
Hope to see you at these events! If you have any questions or require any special accommodations, please let me know.
Cheers,
To remove yourself from this mailing list, remove your name from this list. 22:16, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
February events and meetups in DC
Greetings from Wikimedia DC!
February is shaping up to be a record-breaking month for us, with nine scheduled edit-a-thons and several other events:
- On Friday, February 12, NPR will host a Black History Month First Edit event.
- On Saturday, February 13 and Sunday, February 14, we're working with the Wiki Education Foundation to hold a series of four edit-a-thons at the AAAS 2016 Annual Meeting.
- On Tuesday, February 16, we're holding the Smithsonian American Art Museum and American University WikiWorkshop with Professor Andrew Lih's class.
- On Saturday, February 20, the Smithsonian American Art Museum will host the African American Artists Edit-a-Thon.
- On Friday, February 26, Howard University will host its second annual Black History Month Edit-a-Thon.
- On Saturday, February 27, we have three different events. In the morning, we're holding an Accessibility Edit-a-Thon at Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library. In the afternoon, we'll host our second February WikiSalon at Cove Dupont Circle, followed by our monthly dinner meetup at Vapiano.
We hope to see you at one—or all—of these events!
Do you have an idea for a future event? Please write to us at info@wikimediadc.org!
Kirill Lokshin (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
March events and meetups in DC
Greetings from Wikimedia DC!
Looking for something to do in DC in March? We have a series of great events planned for the month:
- On Wednesday, March 9, we'll host our first March WikiSalon at Cove Dupont Circle.
- On Friday, March 11, the National Archives will host the Women in the Civil War Edit-a-Thon.
- On Saturday, March 19, the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian will host the Color History with the Smithsonian! event, and we'll hold our second Accessibility Edit-a-Thon at the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library.
- On Sunday, March 20, the American Chemical Society will host the Computers in Chemistry Edit-a-Thon.
- On Saturday, March 26, we'll host our second March WikiSalon at Cove Dupont Circle, followed by our monthly dinner meetup at Vapiano.
Can't make it to an event? Most of our edit-a-thons allow virtual participation; see the guide for more details.
Do you have an idea for a future event? Please write to us at info@wikimediadc.org!
Kirill Lokshin (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Tkynerd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Tkynerd. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Entries that need adding
Please add the entries from Category:Unsolved murders in Namibia and Category:Unsolved murders in Nigeria to the list of unsolved murders who aren't on the list already. Due to problem that I am having I may be only semi-active for a while. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I am leaving a reminder to add those entries this weekend. Please do so as many editors said they would edit for me, but often didn't follow through. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC) @User:Davidgoodheart I wasn't able to do this this weekend, but I should be able to get it done this week. --Tkynerd (talk) 09:37, 28 October 2019 (UTC)