Thanks, Aitias, for participating in my recent RfA, which recently passed with 81 support and 1 neutral !votes. I appreciate all the support and constructive criticism offered in my RfA and I thank you for taking the time to !vote in my nomination. I feel so honoured to be trusted by so many of you and please, if you have any advice, comments or complaints about my actions as an administrator, leave a note on my talk page.
Hey. I noticed you reverted vandalism on found poetry. Thanks! The article, unfortunaly, hasn't been looked after a lot lately, so I think part of the problem is that not a lot of people have it on their watchlist. Can you put it on yours? Thank you, Justpassin (talk) 01:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you revert my edit to Talk:Macadamia? Every time I try to mention it in the article or start a discussion on it either there or on someone's talk page, my edits are always reverted before the other person can read my message. It's getting very frustrating. --71.98.90.135 (talk) 19:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you keep reverting my edits? You deleted my message the last time I tried to ask.. isn't there something in the rules about edit wars? If you don't stop, I'm going to seek the counsel of an administrator. --71.98.90.135 (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help on the discussion page... I'm still trying to figure out how to use this thing 0_o It keeps saying that I have a new message, but I don't.. every time I go to Macadamia, it gives me that message.. if I click "last change", it shows the same thing every time.. that you took off that message that other guy wrote. --71.98.90.135 (talk) 19:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey 71.98.90.135. You're welcome. But let me start slowly: You wrote “They also make great cookies out of them” into the Macadamia article, then User:Blanchardbreverted your changes: I think it's better to ask him why he did that at his talk page — You can leave him a message at his talk page by clicking this link. Later you tried to justify your edit by leaving a message at the talk page of the article: That was a good idea, but unfortunately you deleted all the other discussions at the article-talkpage. So your edit really looked like vandalism and I reverted it. After you left a message here at my talk page (I first reverted that message accidentally... Sorry, but there was quite a lot of vandalism on my talk page today... But I reverted my revert as far as possible), I saw that you just don't know how to leave a message at the article-talkpage properly: I immediately went to the talk page of the article and repaired it. I hope this helps you. If you still have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me. :) Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•20:11, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination of Hong Kong Night Skyline.jpg
Hi,
I see you've nominated Hong Kong Night Skyline.jpg. As this is an HDR image, many people think that it's unrealistic and not suitable for wikipedia.
I was wondering if you could nominate this instead. Non-HDR is more realistic for some people.
For creating and sharing useful content, StaticGull Talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hey. I'm sorry, but I could only add a {{Neutral}} , because of the technical quality: The background is a bit distracting and, at full resolution, parts of the subject are not as sharp as they should be. I though think that it's a good picture, but not quite an FP. Sorry again, —αἰτίας•discussion•17:20, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just thought I'd drop by and see how you were getting on. I remember opposing your recent RfA, but I've just come across you again over at RfA ;). It's good to see you are maintaining a high standard of operation on Wikipedia. And you have started to branch out into more areas of the website. Good to see. Keep up the excellent work. :) Very best wishes, Lradrama21:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your support at my RFA - which has closed with me being successful. Your support really means a lot to me, and I look forward to working with you in the future. StephenBuxton (talk) 22:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am grateful for your confidence: My RfA passed by a count of 64/3/3, so I am now an administrator! Of course, I plan to conduct my adminship in service of the community, so I believe the community has a right to revoke that privilege at any time. Thus, I will be open for recall under reasonable circumstances. If you have any advice, complaints, or concerns for me, please let me know. Thanks again! Okiefromoklaquestions?21:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your support in my RFA, which passed with 140 supporting, 11 opposing, and 4 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have given to me. If I can ever assist you with anything, just ask.
Thank you for participating in my RfB! I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at my RfB, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please let me know. Again, Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
...for participating in my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazimoff21:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just a little note to say thankyou for participating in my successful RFA candidacy, which passed with 96 supports, 0 opposes, and 1 neutral. I am pleasantly taken aback by the amount of support for me to contribute in an administrative role and look forward to demonstrating that such faith is well placed. Regards, WilliamH (talk)10:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just thought I'd say Thanks for correcting my spelling on Odwalla! I suppose I should go back to high school! LOL. By the way, please feel free to help out on Odwalla; I need all the help I can get! Intothewoods29 (talk) 02:59, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aitias/archive, I wish to say thanks for your support in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 82 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I will do my best to live up to your expectations. I would especially like to thank Rlevse for nominating me and Wizardman for co-nominating me. — JGHowestalk - 19 August 2008
I'm keeping to receive a note about 'typos' in my provided links ("it's -> its", for instance), though I'm not using such at all. I'm totally confused (I know, that's my problem), but could you help me, please, and explain what I'm doing wrong?
Hello Polygonjunkie. I would be very happy to help, though I don't know how I could help you, as I don't really understand the problem. Where do you receive such a “note”? What exactly does this note say? Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•21:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Morning, αἰτίας! It seems that I'm more NOOB than expected :D In my watchlist, next to Clive Barker's Jericho, there's a text "(clean up, typos fixed: dessicated → desiccated, with it's → with its using AWB)". I didn't use neither of these words in my provided link, so I'm quite confused what I would have to correct... Best regards ;)
Well, now I understand. :) So let me start with general information about the Watchlist: The so called Watchlist shows you the most recent edits in articles you have watchlisted (that means you've pressed the watch tab at the top of a page in order to watchlist a particular article). You may consider to read Help:Watching pages for further information. :) So, you see, what appeared on your watchlist was actually not a message from me. I just edited that article and corrected some spelling mistakes. This mistakes were not from you, they were already in that article before you edited it. I hope everything is clear now, if you need further explanations I would be very happy to help. Please don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions. :) Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•20:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!
I don't know how to thank you, αἰτίας! You're so kind! Please accept my the most sincere gratitude!
@DerHexer: Thank you. :) However I am going to thank everyone on his/her talk page, as I really wish to say thanks to every user for their trust. :) If you don't want to get such a message at your talk page, let me thank you here once again. Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•21:58, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations on getting the mop, now just don't go deleting the main page and everything will be just fine... :P, anyways congrats of passing your RfA :), oh and here's your honorary admin tee shirt :P. Congrats, --Mifter (talk) 23:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remember you must always follow the rules, except for when you ignore them. You will always pick the wrong one to do. (See #5)
Remember to assume good faith and not bite. Remember that when you are applying these principles most diligently, you are probably dealing with a troll.
Use the block ability sparingly. Enjoy the insults you receive when you do block.
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL.
Thank you for your thanks, Aitias, and many congratulations. You were a fine administrator-in-waiting, and you'll do a great job. Again, καλὴ τύχη! haz (talk) 07:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
hi, I would like to discuss a topic with you. I have been a Wikipedia user for about four years. in that time I have been an editor. only recently have certain people started causing trouble. I am asking you to correspond and maybe we can reverse the problem. Assuredly (talk) 13:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Assuredly. Whilst I would be very happy to help you, I really don't know how to, as I am not able to understand what your problem is and how I can help you. Perhaps you can explain. :) Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•00:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would strongly recommend reading the introduction of the AIV-page. There it says:
“
Important! – your report must follow these three points:
[...]
[...]
The user must be given sufficient recentwarnings to stop.”
User:Gerard Craig has only received two warnings until now; an uw-v1 and an uw-v2 warning ([1]). This means he has not received a final warning (neither an uw-v4 nor an uw-v4im one) yet. Therefore he simply was not sufficiently warned when you reported him to AIV. Accordingly the user can not be blocked at this point. If the user vandalises again in the future and is warned sufficiently you are free to report him another time.
That part I understand, but since his first (and only as of this writing) two edits were vandalism, I thought that bypassed that rule due to edits. If it was me or you, who have established edits (lots), then I would understand the need for the full 4 warnings. I will keep an eye on his edits, to make sure he doesn't get to that 4 mark. - NeutralHomer • Talk01:25, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My RfA
Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a count of (154/3/2). I appreciate the community's trust in me, and I will do my best to be sure it won't regret handing me the mop. I am honored by your trust and your support. Again, thank you. –JuliancoltonTropicalCyclone18:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I just check the Request for Permissions page and I noticed you seemed to leave my entry out. Can you just check that. Thanks Olly15020:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello zzuuzz. I did not enable this new blocking option intentionally, but accidently: I usually use User:Animum's blocking script. When blocking an user/an IP with this script, the new blocking option seems to be enabled per default. :-/ Therefore I removed this script from my monobook.js and asked Animum for fixing the script. Finally I would like to thank you a lot for this message. Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•13:39, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is no problem. I just want to thank you for blocking the vandal. Oh, I typed "but..." by mistake! I've erased it. Have a nice day! :-) AdjustShift (talk) 17:00, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have been watching and editting the Respiratory System page, which I think is improving nicely. Unfortunately, it receives near daily vandalism. I noted you had placed a vandalism warning on the talk page of a user who recently vandalised the Respiratory System page. Since your warning was noted as a "last chance," I would appreciate any help you can provide with regard to reducing vandalism on the Respiratory System page. I haven't been editing in Wikipedia long and I am trying to learn many new things. LLDMart (talk) 14:48, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Are you referring to this article? My last edit in this article is from February 2008... Well, unfortunately I can't see a chance to do much against the vandalism at this point. Of course you are free to request (semi-) protection of this page in accordance with the Protection policy, however I don't think there is enough recent vandalism to justify a protection now. Generally you can report vandals to WP:AIV. Such reports must follow the three points noted at this page. All in all, as said above, I don't think there's much that can be done against the vandalism at this point. :( I hope I could help you a bit, if you have further questions don't hesitate to ask me. :) Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•15:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Aitias, first off, congratulations on your successful request for adminship. :) I'm glad you passed: I know you'll be fine. Secondly, thanks for the note on my talk page: that was very kind of you. :) Best wishes. Acalamari16:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was hoping you could help me with understanding the deletion of the Mako Models posting. I have included significant information regarding the company, maintained editing guidelines, and gave a basic reference. I am not sure what else to include in order for the article to not be included under Speed Deletion.
<- Theres no need to be sorry Aitias. Why would someone want to edit the page anyway? If it does then an admin can be called to do it, simple. Its funny "how do you turn this on" that you have not edited the page since. What do you want to add to it? 137.154.16.30 (talk) 03:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree with you, How do you turn this on. In the future I will first unblock and then reblock enabling the "cannot edit own talk page" block option. :-) Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•18:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
RfA
Hi. Thoughtful oppose. On the subject of conflict, the user has masses of (often repeat, argumentative) edits at AfD - you know how heated AfD gets. The fact that the user doesn't regard any of the ensuing discussions as conflict actually tells you all you need to know on that particular score. --Dweller (talk) 16:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that may be true, however this is not the only point that concerns me. As explained in my rationale, there are quite a lot of concerning points in my opinion. Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•18:28, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, I wasn't trying to get you to change your !vote (clearly), just challenging an aspect. Currently your comments re conflict remain on the RfA and may influence future !votes. I was hoping you might strike or annotate them, per this discussion. --Dweller (talk) 23:00, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please suggest how I many develop more experience. I have not come across many articles that were in need of deletion, let alone Speedy Deletion. I can not click on the link provided in the reason, as it is an admin function. -- Matthew Glennon(Talk to me)19:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thx. I actually didn't know about Special:NewPages until about an hour ago when I clicked the link another requestor left. In the past I've aimed my editing at counter-vandalism, but with NewPages I'll be able to demonstrate my ability to decide what constitutes speedy deletion. Thanks for the advice. I must ask though, what would you suggest is a good mile marker for re-requesting? -- Matthew Glennon(Talk to me)21:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I either don't know, or don't have access to a way to see which RfSD's I've made have followed through. Could you either point me to a location I can find them, or hook me up with the info? Thanks!-- Matthew Glennon(Talk to me)21:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
When you might have time this week, perhaps you'll re-evaluate my request for NPWatcher. I've worked on demonstrating RfSD. This software really would be helpful (specially because WP:HUG is broken). -- Matthew Glennon (T/C\D) 01:11, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aitias, I'd like to thank you for voting in my RFA. Thanks also for expressing your trust in me, and I hope that I live up to your expectations. Don't forget, if you have any questions (or bits of advice), please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again, SpencerT♦C02:29, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. This is is the first time I've requested a page to be protected and you have declined it as There is not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection at this time. I'm sorry but I don't follow. The IP has since re-added the disruptive bio since I requested the protection, which would seem to me pretty recent! Is there some other route I should follow e.g requesting the IP be blocked? This is the only page the IP seems to be editing. Tassedethe (talk) 22:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Pages may only be protected in accordance with the Protection policy. Therefore it's worth reading the policy before requesting a protection (especially if doing this the first time). The policy defines that there has to be either heavy and persistent disruptive activity (for indefinite semi-protection) or significant and heavy recent disruptive activity (for temporary semi-protection). None of this possible circumstances applies here. Thus, there was no possibility to protect the page. Of course you are free to take other action, which you consider to be appropriate. If you think there is a basis to request the IP to be blocked you may do this for example here or here. Hope this helps. Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•22:38, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply. I did read the policy but of course its difficult to fit particular circumstances to guidelines. Heavy and significant are subjective words, and without explicit guidelines (and especially for the first time) its difficult to gauge what counts as heavy and significant. There are no examples of heavy or significant edits at the policy page. As a percentage of the total page size (a dab page is usually pretty small) they would seem to be significant edits. I didn't feel AIV was the appropriate place for a single IP repeatedly editing a single page but the WP:ANI page is new to me. Tassedethe (talk) 23:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
NPwatcher
Thank you for taking the time to review my application. However, Martinp23 (creater of NPwatcher) has already decided to give me access to the tool. So your input is not necessary. Cheers! Mww113(talk)00:25, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Aitias. Thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for Adminship, which was successful with 111 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutral. I have to say I am more than a little overwhelmed by this result and I greatly appreciate your trust in me. I will do my best to use the tools wisely. Thanks again. Regards. Thingg⊕⊗00:00, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! Just a note thanking you for supporting my RFA which successfully passed with 60 supports, 0 opposes and 2 neutrals. I hope I'll be able to live up to everyone's expectations, and thank you for trusting me! All the best, Ale_Jrbtalk20:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, unfortunately I don't have a lot of experience in coaching. :( Therefore I think it's better to ask a more experienced admin coach. As far as I have reviewed this RfA the main points of criticism seem to be communication issues and lack of article writing. I think there would not be much I could do about that, most likely he has to work on this points himself. Sorry. :( —αἰτίας•discussion•16:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for taking the time to review my RfA. While you did not support my nomination, I still appreciate the fact that you took the time to evaluate my contributions, and provide me with important feedback. Even though my RfA was successful, I intend to take your advice and do some significant article work as well. All the best, XymmaxSo let it be writtenSo let it be done05:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rfa Spam
Thank you so much for your support on my RFA, which today passed unanimously. I will do my best to make sure that I don't let any of you down. If you ever need any help with anything, feel free to ask me, i'll be happy to. Thanks again--Jac16888 (talk) 16:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep an eye out for this guy. His MO is pretty standard, and he's been harassing J. Delanoy for some time now. If he comes back, seek an admin to insta-block him. I generally just block him on sight with his first edit. If you need help in this regard, a quick AIV post with a link to the SSP report I quoted on his userpage should get an Admin on it real quick. Thanks for your vigilance and keep up the good work! --Jayron32.talk.contribs14:02, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If I had known that this user is a sockpuppet, who was harassing J.delanoy persistently, I would have blocked him myself. ;-) However, thanks for the note. :) Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•14:11, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. :) Thank you as well. Regarding the semi-protection of my talk page I don't think there is enough disruptive activity until now to justify a semi-protection. However, if vandalism continues I'll protect. Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•21:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to semi the IP's talk and/or increase the block length, as he is replacing the page with "Fuck you." Erik the Red 2 ~~~~21:53, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I downloaded the newest version but it won't let me log in! I have tried to log in with both this account and my public account but neither worked. What am I doing wrong? --Cameron*15:30, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Wizardman. You're absolutely free to extend the block to indef. :) As far as I am concerned, I would not disagree with an indef block either. Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•18:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey. I strongly recommend reading the introduction of the AIV-page. If you report users/IPs to that page they must be warned sufficiently and they must be active. Regards, —αἰτίας•discussion•17:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
means "of reason", "of cause" see:[5]
because it's genitive as you said. well i'm Greek. and as you see from google translate ancient form and modern is the same (minus the diacritics who have been out of real use for centuries.) As Ancient Greek had a pitch accent like that of Swedish or Serbo-Croatian. google.translate gives the periphrasy because inflection is to difficult to translateCuteHappyBrute (talk) 23:20, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. “[...] the Nominative case Singular is αἰτία (aitia). It means “cause, reason”.”. You see, “It means” refers to “the Nominative” (αἰτία) and not to αἰτίας. Thus the given translation is correct. Regards, —αἰτίας•discussion•23:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Declined move-protect request
There was a reason. It was: "Visible pages that have no reason to be moved". Please read the link that you provided. -- IRP☎23:35, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I may recommend staying civil. Don't worry, I know the protection policy and I always read the pages, to which I provide links. :) However, there was no reason for protection, as this page is simply not such a highly visible page. Therefore there was no reason to protect it preemptively. Regards, —αἰτίας•discussion•23:48, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi αἰτίας! Thank you very much for the questions and support in my RfA, which passed yesterday. Despite the concerns raised by certain users, I hope not to let you and the others down by easing in to the admin tools and making careful and informed decisions. Cheers, Ynhockey(Talk)18:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! As part of an MBA assignment, I am conducting interviews with active Wikipedia contributors. Would I be able to ask you a few brief questions about your work on Wikipedia? I am available to communicate via email or on Wikipedia. Thank you! LBV13 (talk) 18:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I received a comment from the user, just before you blocked. I now agree with the user and have reverted my last reversion of his on McQuaid Jesuit High School. I think he was not doing vandalism, he just did not explain his actions properly. You might want to take a look and reconsider, give him a cluestick rap and see how it goes from there. -- Alexf(talk)19:47, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. I only looked at the one reversion I've done. It seems it may have been a different school user removing this edit about a non-existent, unreferenced person. But you know how it is about schools. You are correct then. Thanks. -- Alexf(talk)20:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, well the previous wording was "up to 1 year", this was changed to "1 year or longer". I thought it didn't mean much (how long is "longer"), and was contradicting the previous version. I don't think it brings much at the moment. But I'll be happy to undo and discuss if you disagree. -- lucasbfrtalk23:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't quite understand. :/ If I do understand you correctly, you disagree with the "or longer"? In this case it would have been appropriate to remove just "or longer". But you removed the "up to 1 year" as well. Was that intended? I could still see a point in removing "or longer" —as you said how long is "or longer"?— however I don't see a reason for removing "up to 1 year". Thus, I think it would be reasonable to reinsert it. :) Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•23:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Aitias, recently, the page Saints Row 2 has been suffering from Vandalism alot and when i view the history, it has been reverted to previous versions alot. Could it be possible to put semi-protection or something on it to protect it from un-registered users (IPs)? Either that or give me Rollback abilities because its annoying having to revert all the time. Thank you and have a nice day. DJ MeXsTa (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey DJ MeXsTa. :) Please use WP:RFPP to request the protection of a page. Concerning rollback I don't feel comfortable granting this time, as you seem to have very little experience in reverting vandalism. Please gain some experience in this area using tools like undo or twinkle. If you can demonstrate some experience soon I would be happy to grant rollback. :) Best wishes, —αἰτίας•discussion•17:55, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
—Animum (talk) 00:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
.svg){kind=logo}
Important! – your report must follow these three points:
-_Good_pic.jpg)
Done ([3], [4]). Hope it's okay now. :) Best wishes, —αἰτίας •discussion• 20:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
. MBisanz talk 16:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
