As you archived this without answering, I post it again:
About your onomastics pages. I am not quite certain what these pages should look like. I don't understand why you mix information about names (which belongs to onomastics) with information about families and their members (which in my opinion rather belongs on pages about the family (if the people are all related) or a disambiguation page (if they are not). I (and many other people) are not certain why people with different, but loosely related names should be listed on the same page. Perhaps you can explain that? Kusma(討論)08:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been told many many times by many users that you should make sure the redirects you made continue to articles directly where readers should go. This is a quote from the Move Function page: "You are responsible for making sure that links continue to point where they are supposed to go." But you didn't and as a result, there are a lot of double redirects you have made. Make sure you correct those redirects and don't make users confused. Sylphie02:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked again
You still create interwiki links to nonexistent pages on the Japanese Wikipedia. As you have been told for more than a year to stop this and you never reacted, I have blocked you for 48 hours. If you evade this block again by using IPs or sockpuppets, I will start efforts to have you banned from Wikipedia. If you engage in discussion (on this talk page, which you can still edit) about this block and convince me (or some other administrator) that you will go through your contributions and remove all the bad links, you can be unblocked. Kusma(討論)06:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to comment on the deletion of your user talk subpages, you'll need to get this account unblocked first. Or politely post a message here that can be copied to the MfD discussion for you by someone else. Kusma(討論)13:40, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
He clearly doesn't understand about logging in while blocked to edit this page. Perhaps you should have someone explain it in Japanese? --Batamtig15:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
He's already indicated that he doesn't understand by his attempts to edit the page with sockpuppets, and by his asking how he could co-operate with other users while blocked.--Batamtig18:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey.
I know you're upset about the blocking.
I know you meant well.
But you were doing it the wrong way, and you weren't listening to advice or warnings.
You were making mistakes, you were making work for other people to fix.
"request for comment" may be full of hates and violence, blames, attacks. I'll fight and protest AETERNALLY for my enemies. --Schönherz19:25, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You said, ""request for comment" may be full of hates and violence, blames, attacks." I can say that, having read that request for comment it most assuredly was NOT full of hate, violence, blame, or attacks. It was astonishingly full of love, concern, and worry. Please calm down and try to understand that people are NOT your enemies, but they DO want to understand you. ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs) 19:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop your edits on Basch article!
Hi again! You have assured me and I think I have assured you to. There are non-Jewish German Basches and Jewish ones to. I have asked the rabbi of Budapest about it on the first day of our "fight". So stop editing because you get never unbolocked.
1. About the redlinks: I will make articles about "redlinked" Basches and afterall I will put them on the list.
2. About Basche and Baschin: I think these names have no connections with name Basch, but I don't know much about Jewish surnames because I've been never intrested in them. Do you think that Basche and Baschin have taken their names after the "Ben Simon" theory. Maybe you are right.
HunTheGoaT 11:23, 3 September 2006 (CEST)
Hello. But.. This is onomastics page. If there are place name like *Baschendorf, I'll add to the list. And, Siegmund Basch, etc are your edits. (Sheynhertz) 16:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Why should Baschendorf be on that list? Do you have concrete evidence that it has to do with "Basche", other than sounding similar? Kusma(討論)16:49, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It has been explained to you that the edits you reverted are not vandalism, but cleanup. We do not want our encyclopedia to be full of half-translated articles containing huge amounts of red links of questionable relevance. Please take your time to read the RfC and the mediation requests again. You believe your edits are all useful, many others believe they do more harm than good. You did not answer to complaints, and then you were blocked. You evaded this block by using alternate accounts and IPs, and you were banned. You did not change anything about your behaviour and continued to edit using new accounts, so I blocked your ISP (just as it was blocked on the Japanese Wikipedia). If you want to edit here, you need to understand the complaints against your behaviour and change it. I would have preferred to resolve the conflict with you by discussion instead of blocks, but you refused to take part in the discussion, so you left me no choice. Kusma(討論)09:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't revert!
Don't revert my edits! You are takin' in scorn (verachten, zum besten haben) my efforts!!
Revive my edits, and cancel "blocking" this minute, now!
I havn't read the massages from you and other users yet.
I love Bloch, Vlachs, but don't like block.
I like buns and banner, van, but don't like BAN and BANner.
If you do not read the messages, you will not understand. You created a mess here, and other people are now working to clean it up. Kusma(討論)14:13, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"IP adress 210.128.247.147 is mostly User:Sheynhertz-Unbayg's contribution." is correct, as you can check by looking at Special:Contributions/210.128.247.147. And I do not scorn your efforts. Like most people at the RFC, I believe that you are trying to be useful by expanding Wikipedia's coverage of Judaism-related articles. However, the way you did that created a massive amount of necessary cleanup work for other editors. You treated the other editors cleaning up your articles with scorn, calling their edits "vandalism". You refused to answer to the request for comment when others wanted to discuss with you about your work. As an aside, have you noticed that your work is also notwelcome on other Wikipedias. Perhaps you should stop accusing others and acknowledge that there is a problem with your work? Kusma(討論)12:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"This is a communal address" is also correct. I once thought "request for comment" may be full of hates and violence, blames, attacks, like Japanese (I once had cruel, bitter experiences.). --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך14:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Re
Hello Herr Kusma. Thank you for answering.
I'm very busy and tired, confusing, very sad and very depressed now. I had many scars (wounds) in mein Hartz.
And I can't E-Mail, etc now (because Mail-password is missing).
Can I edit also my sandbox pages (kurzgesagt, my User spages)? I must einricht my contributions.
No, when you are blocked, the only page you can edit is your talk page. The software doesn't allow for selective blocks. What is in the Sandbox11 page that you need? It seems mostly useful only for the Japanese Wikipedia. Kusma(討論)18:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You said you'd discuss this with Japanese people, so I assumed they would take care of it. As you have been indefinitely blocked from the Japanese Wikipedia, what do you need it for? Kusma(討論)12:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's not any relating about box8-past, etc and you. I'll discuss with ja:User:Arpeggio. he is one of the my few acquaintances on the Wiki. Judaism on Japan and Japanese people's knowledges of Judaism are very few. Are you Anti-Judaist? Why don't you revive only 48 hours?
(de-indent) You have tried to wrongly portray me as an anti-Semite many times already. You should top doing that, it does not help your case. Also, you are not blocked infinitely, but indefinitely. That means, the duration of the block is unspecified, and it is possible for the block to be lifted once there is evidence that you will not continue your behavior that caused the block. That is what I said here, but I must add that your behavior since then (sockpuppets and personal attacks against me both here and on the German Wikipedia) has made me less inclined to unblock you. What would you do if you are unblocked? Kusma(討論)16:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The redlinks are deleted because disambiguation for them is not yet needed. Disambiguation pages are not meant to contain much information. Their purpose is to point the reader quickly to all of our existing pages that he might search for under that name. And a page is either a disambiguation page or a surname-stub, both is impossible. Kusma(討論)18:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your pages did not say much about onomastics. They just listed people with names that you think are related. No people need to be listed on an onomastics page. I have cleaned up Jeanette Wohl and listed her at Wohl, a page that needs to be split. I do not believe that "Yiddish spelling of Wahl" is the only possible source for the name "Wohl", by the way. Kusma(討論)09:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What di you mean? I have a heart of flint? That must be the reason I reacted so calmly to your death threats on my German Wikipedia talk page, which alone should be enough reason to keep you blocked for quite a while. Kusma(討論)09:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What do you want to do with it? As usual, there was very little about the names on that page, just alist of people with names that contain "Land". I have moved the people to the corrsponding disambiguation pages (which was quite a lot of work), and couldn't see the point of keeping the page after all disambiguation information was moved away. Perhaps you can explain? Kusma(討論)08:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
For example, A link to Rabbi Daniel Landes is deleted. I can't explain and discuss any more, weil I can't see all editing history. Please Revive speedy or move to my self-sandbox; And cancel the foolish blocking now, speedy.
On disambiguation pages, we usually write the articles first, then add links to them (it is not clear to me that we really need an article about Daniel Landes, you only said he was a rabbi, which is not enough in my eyes). And please stop calling good-faith cleanup edits "vandalism". We can't keep these pages in the state you left them, that's why we have the Wikipedia:SU page (not started by me, I might add) where we try to fix all of these pages by turning them into ordinary disambiguation pages. Often, onomastics information is removed, but it is usually just the unverified claim "The following names come from the same root" that doesn't seem to be enough content for an actual article. The disambiguation information about people and information about the interconnection of the names do not belong on a single page. Kusma(討論)07:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently you still do not understand. I did not vandalize. Your unability to understand that the way you like these pages is not acceptable is a major part of the reason you were blocked (see the RfC and the MedCabal cases). Your obstinate insistence that any cleanup or removal of unsuitable information from your pages is "vandalism" just makes me feel sure that blocking you was the right thing to do. Accusing me of vandalism or foolishness is not going to help you get unblocked. Kusma(討論)08:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are erroring. their cleanup are deletion, and not unsuitable. For example, Landolt is famous. And you disambiguated Helfand by no permission. I can't explain and discuss any more because I'm busy now. And, you didn't try to revive any pages I requested; because you hates me. This is true. --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך08:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sheynhertz, if you are too busy to explain, you should not be making all these articles. To be able to edit WP, you have to be able to explain what you're doing to other users.
Nobody hates you. Stop accusing people of hating, scorning etc. If you continue doing this, you will never be unbanned
"Nobody knows the troubles I see, Lord! No body knows like Adonay" 12:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC) (Sheynhertz)
Why can't you read and respond to what others write on your talk pages? And your troubles are what you yourself have created. Batamtig18:16, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How to get unblocked
Sheynhertz, to be unblocked, you have to start reading what other people write, and taking notice and responding to them. Most importantly, you must convince us you will change the way you have been behaving. Right now, you can't edit other pages, but you'll need to state on this page that you'll do these things.
Take a look at what someone who knows you wrote, here:
I am absolutely appalled at what has happenend. I used to have friendly contact with Sheynhertz-Unbayg on a number of topics, especially articles on Judaism. However I lost touch and he seemed to have disappeared. I noticed later that there were some strange fall-outs from the Japanese Wikipedia that spilt over, which really made me wonder since it was surprising. I wish I knew how to help to defuse the situation, however reading the comments of users that have had other dealings makes me wonder if it is actually the same user? Reading through the comments I trust Kusma's judgement, but to me this is just nevertheless really bizarre, highly unfortunate and saddening. Gryffindor 21:02, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
I am really saddened by what seems to have overcome User:Sheynhertz-Unbayg after all these years. Perhaps he is suffering from fatigue or other problems as until recently he was not a problem. I have encouraged him in some great detail to respond to this RfC here (User talk:Sheynhertz-Unbayg#Sheynhertz we need your help) but so far he has not responded. Let us hope that what has happened to him on the Japanese Wikipedia will calm him down. IZAK 06:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Why have you been behaving in way that has shocked, horrified and saddened your friends? Why do you threaten to kill people or commit suicide? Why do you accuse others of hating and scorning you? Why do you just erase whatever others do that you don't like? Why don't you listen and try to understand?
Kusma has been very reasonable with you - he gave you many many warnings before he blocked you. Even now, he continues to talk to you.
To be unbanned, you will need to change. As a start, reply to this message. Answer the questions. Show us that you take it seriously. If you just continue doing what you have been doing, you will not be unblocked. If you show us you will change, you will probably be unblocked Batamtig20:39, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you respond to my message? If you don't learn to communicate normally with other users, you will never be unbanned. Do you want to remain banned? You can't just communicate with Kusma, you have to learn to work within the Wikipedia community and to stop ignoring messages from other users. Batamtig21:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are currently not allowed to edit, no matter under which account or IP address (I noticed you recently started to use 210.151.108.110 (talk·contribs) again, did you think it would not be noticed?). You need to change before you can be allowed to edit. If you continue to interfere with our cleanup project at Wikipedia:SU, we will just have to block all the IPs you use for longer and longer times. This is wasting your time and ours. Kusma(討論)07:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you can't change your behavior, there is nothing that can be done about your block. If you change your behavior, there is still hope. I haven't seen you change one bit so far, though. Kusma(討論)08:51, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
語源に関しては協力してほしい; It's difficult to me to write-down about every words and derivated variation-forms' origins; Then I'll make Template:Etymology-stub; I ask and want that many people- Native Yiddish or German, other languages' speaker, Jewish people and non-Jewish people, professional and amateur linguists, historians and other many researchers- takes part in my linguistical and historial "onomastics" pages, etc.; and I'm shouting for help! Please join in my projects!
What do you mean by "what is [name]?". Are you asking how the name is derived? Once again, I suggest you could make more useful contributions by working on genealogy pages? —Batamtig17:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What are Onomastics pages?
Onomastics pages does not make fragments, scraps
Onomastics pages prevents deletion. (for example: deletions by User:Niteowlneils[7]; see history)
You keep saying "without permission", but whose permission did he need? There are places where you can complain about admin's actions (deletions, etc.), but until you try to understand what other users are saying, I don't see any point. Batamtig12:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Onomastics pages clears about relationships, connectionships of each names (I think; Rosen-, Gold- or Hirsch/Herz/Herschen-- style surnames has thousands of variants); and avoids and prevents about separation and too many-building of articles.
New proposal; categorisation for the disambiguation pages: adapt the categories and interlangs, etc. for "disambiguation pages" too! (Then, more proper and useful for onomastics- my pages)
New proposal, like *{{semi-disambiguation}}?; For example, please think about pages, once made as surname- or family(genealogical)-page, and added human- or any names to the list (e.g. Fleischhauer, Austrian German dialect and Yiddish?).
this is not disambiguation page, or disambiguation-only page. This is linguistic, historic, morphologic page.
What's this?!! --> Wikipedia:SU I protest to this page. People don't understand onomastics pages.
They don't understand because you never bothered to explain. WP has rules, see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. You broke these rules many many many times, and refused again and again to talk about it. What we're doing at Wikipedia:SU is cleaning up these pages and making them conform to the format that we expect from articles in the English language wikipedia. These pages do not belong to you, see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. If you would like to make suggestions about how we should proceed with these pages, you can post a polite message here, and I will post it to Wikipedia talk:SU on your behalf. BUT... you should understand that the pages will be cleaned (redlinks removed, untranslated German language material removed, etc.) to conform to WP rules.
By the way, I think that your "onomastics" pages could be very useful for Jewish geneology studies, but only if they conform to the rules, and only if you can communiucate with others about it. Your blocking will not be cancelled until you can communicate with others. Batamtig07:25, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I ask and want that many people- Native Yiddish or German, other languages' speaker, Jewish people and non-Jewish people, professional and amateur linguists, historians and other many researchers- takes part in my linguistical and historial "onomastics" pages, etc.; and I'm shouting for help! Please join in my projects! It should have linguistic (morphologic, etymologic, historic) consistencial accounts (Please read the Nelly Weiss' book; You can buy). But, I can't or difficult to expand and write linguistic article only alone. Let us devide, defend, keep and maintain; and devise, develop and grow these project by everyone!
Onomastics pages are like sea squirts, salps ([9]); they don't (can not?) live alone
I do not quite understand what you say. Can you explain again? And why should all of this be in an encyclopedia? Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Perhaps a separate Wiki would be better for your preojects. But please do explain, for example what you mean by "Onomastics page prevents deletion". I have no idea what that sentence is supposed to mean. Kusma(討論)14:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You said indiscriminate; this is a point. Onomastics pages is not indiscriminate information or collection. It should have linguistic (morphologic, etymologic, historic) consistencial accounts (Please read the Nelly Weiss' book; You can buy). But, I can't or difficult to expand and write linguistic article only alone. Let us devide, defend, keep and maintain; and devise, develop and grow these project by everyone. This is a new project. --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך14:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I do not understand you. If you want help, you'll need to be able to explain what exactly your project is. I do not feel inclined to unblock you, because your recent IP edits make me not trust you that you won't restart what you did before. Kusma(討論)15:38, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I do not hate you (as has been pointed out to you several times), but this discussion is clearly getting us nowhere. I will take this page off my watchlist now. If you want to appeal your block, you may put {{unblock}} on your talk page, email any administrator (the list is here) or email the unblock request list at unblock-en-l@wikipedia.org. Best wishes, Kusma(討論)16:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
One was deleted as untranslated copy from a foreign Wikipedia, the other for not asserting the importance of the subject. Both deletions were perfectly normal and within the scope of the speedy deletion criteria. You can check the deletion log to find out who deleted the pages: Special:Log/delete. Kusma(討論)15:38, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hope!
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I can't any works- discuss, explain, order my contributions, etc. I was once shocked, and now I'm very sad, tired. I reached the limits of my patience. I can't put up! Help me!! -- Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך07:50, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You will not be unblocked until, as a first step, you learn to communicate. You have ignored all efforts to communicate with you (see my message above). So, it seems, you are not capable of communicating. Therefore, you will remain blocked indefinitely. Work on changing yourself. --Batamtig19:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You mean you were too shocked to communicate? This is not an excuse. Other users have been contacting you for more than year about problems with your edits, but you didn't respond. Have you been "shocked" all this time? Kusma contacted you dozens of times before banning you, but you refused to respond.
Even now, you're not really communicating. The phrase "I was shocked" is not really meaningful. Why were you shocked, and how did this prevent you from communicating?
Do you know how to activate your e-mail? Please do so and e-mail me; I think that this will be better than discussion on your user page.--Runcorn23:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!! You are the only man pointed out Kusma's errors. But, (see above) I can't use my E-Mail now, because mail-password is missing now. --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך05:17, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Sorry; you are in communication with Kusma, yes? Discuss the situation with him, and he will unblcok you when things are resolved properly. If not, you have to explain yourself here. I realize you must not do so well with English, but please try to understand the concerns and address them. Mangojuicetalk05:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I suggest you get an email address at one of the web-based email providers and email me or Runcorn if you want to discuss any further. As long as you don't show any evidence for having changed your behaviour (you didn't even try to answer Batamtig's messages), nobody seems to be willing to unblock you. Kusma(討論)07:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are not allowed to edit here under alternate accounts such as Romyn(talk·contribs·deleted contribs·page moves·block user·block log). I do acknowledge that your edits to biographical articles under this account were somewhat better than before, although I am not convinced that creating English stubs from German articles when neither your German nor your English are all that good is the best use you can make of your time. Anyway, your creation of onomastics pages that are just a combination of several surname disambiguation pages is not wanted here, as you can see from the Wikipedia:SU project. Putting stub tags or expansion tags on these pages does not make them any better. Perhaps there is (or could be created) a Jewish genealogy wiki somewhere where your efforts would be more welcome and more useful? Kusma(討論)11:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
After seeing that your newly created pages still had links to nonexisting articles on other language Wikipedias, I take back my statement that you have been improving. Kusma(討論)14:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hope
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I can't anything- "communication" also! Ich hob keyn tikves nun. 16:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Because you're not trying at all. Add your email address to my preference and follow the instructions in the confirmation email. Then you can goto any user's page, for example User:Kusma (the administrator who blocked you) and then click the E-mail this user link in the toolbox on the left hand side of the page. There's also nothing stopping you from leaving messages directly on this page either. -- Netsnipe ► 18:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You cannot edit anything apart from this page until you get yourself unblocked. Is it really that hard to resolve your differences with Kusma (talk • contribs)? It seems like you're trying very hard not to contact him or anyone else for that matter. I've already given you instructions on how to email him, but you still haven't registered an email address for your Wikipedia account. You've had a long history of problematic edits without trying to seek consensus first. This block isn't to punish you, it's there to force you to change your ways. -- Netsnipe ► 07:09, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is no technical way to prevent you from editing in the main space but allowing you to edit sandbox pages. As your recent actions with your last alternate account have not made me confident that you will stop interfering with the cleanup project going on at Wikipedia:SU, I do not see a reason to unblock you at this moment. You can try to convince me of the contrary, of course, and I will listen. Kusma(討論)07:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your "efforts" still have the same problem they had when I blocked you. There is consensus that last name disambiguation pages should be for one last name only, and the problems your efforts have caused are being worked on by the nice people at Wikipedia:SU. It is also not helpful to create redirects to sections in articles, as they do not work, or to place interwiki links that go to nonexistent pages. Your sockpuppets still do that. If you are unable to learn from your mistakes and do not stop making the same mistakes again and again, you will not be unblocked. Kusma(討論)15:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see; almost a year ago, around 25 October 2005, User:Niteowlneils deleted some of these onomastics type articles, and you want Kusma to block Niteowlneils for that. Is that what you are saying? Why would Kusma block Niteowlneils for attempting to clean up those articles? ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs) 14:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think this shows that already a year ago, somebody noticed that something is wrong with your onomastics pages, but you did not learn from that - did you ask him why he deleted those pages? Kusma(討論)15:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, you are the creator of matters - you wrote all these pages. Plus, two wrongs don't make a right: that he didn't talk to you should not have stopped you from talking to the people in the RfC (or to me when I tried in August). Kusma(討論)07:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I can't anything. I'm I'm very embarrased and at a loss! -by Schejnenhartz 05:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Sorry, but you don't seem to understand that we will not unblock you until you have resolved your differences with Kusma (talk • contribs). Please email him as we have repeatedly asked you before. You will no longer be allowed to edit this page until you are unblocked. -- Netsnipe ► 08:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Blocking and unblocking
User:Netsnipe locked this page. Sheynhertz-Unbayg, I've unblocked it with his agreement, but I'm afraid that this is your last chance. If you don't do something positive, it will be locked again. Please create a new e-mail address and contact User:Kusma and myself.--Runcorn20:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's a serious question. Why do you find it so difficult to talk to others, and why do you take everything as a personal insult? Batamtig20:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I can't understand. Japanese people don't use that word so. But, ich hob keyn Fraynt nun, and solitary. And see below. I'm very busy, and I can't edit wie I thought. I decided to edit only my user-pages (e.g.sandboxes) by IP address. no other ways.--Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך22:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
"Very busy"? You have time to post some to Japanese Wikipedia, evading the ban for a lot of times. In ja.wp today, you have evaded blocks for eight times in 20 minutes, and created a couple of sockpuppets, currently blocked. For you, that would be a waste of time, precious for solving problems you have been making, communicating each other and unbanning you. And your misbehavings such as evading blocks, creating sockpuppets, being rude do not make sense at all. Why do you try not to talk to others, and do illegal actions? Sylphie03:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You do bad actions because I haven't read your comments? That's your misunderstanding. I have read a lot, but what you have been saying are "Unblock, unban, stop reverting!" Such shouting does not solve problems around you. You should start communications with others with civility. How do you think about your way to edit articles? How about the Policies? How do you think about cooperating? Do you understand dos and don'ts? These are what the Community is asking you. Try talking. Just do it. Sylphie13:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just look at what you were doing... Copyright infringement, providing fake licensing information, ignoring NPOV policy, ignoring the manual of style, having incivility, vandalising Userpages, interrupting discussions, personal attacking, especially calling someone "a devil" and comparing someone with Hitler, evading the blocks and the ban, creating and use of abusive sockpuppets, and so on. Those are illegal. Stopping such actions is a must for you. ↑: These assertions are good example for slander, bullying, pressing and bashing against me. 十以上の記事でも書いてから言え! --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך04:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not responsible for your failure in getting driver's license, you know.
Most of your comments are not acceptable either as an individual or as a community.
I do not vandalise, harass, mistreat, bully, tease and abuse, but YOU DO.
There's no other way for you than to use mailing list. Just use it. Your order for a house does not interrput it. What does "discovered a paper" mean? You cannot send any mails because you "made password"? Password system is a must for mailing systems.
User:Kusma/Sheynhertz is just a list of your ISP's ranges that I blocked. What is it that I do not understand? (Kusma)
I know that Sylphie told anything you (but I don't know). You mustn't coöperate and collaborate him. He never make any articles, trotz He is enjoying that I'm suffering and angry. --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך00:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Glen S recently apologized to me for reverting me and said it was a mistake. This has nothing to do with the GFDL. Your accusations against Sylphie are completely off-topic here. You stubbornly refuse to see any fault in what you did and only see problems in other users. That is not a way to solve the problems that led to your ban. Kusma(討論)06:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome, Welcome. You are mein Chaver. That page is not disambiguation page, but onomastics page- linguistics, etymology, morphology, histoy, genealogy, geology, all the variants.. etc. Please edit, add and expand and join my projects about wie that pages.