Anti-abortion feminism: Difference between revisions
m →Views and goals: minor rephrase per suggestion at BLPN |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Views and goals== |
==Views and goals== |
||
Pro-life feminists believe that the legal option of abortion "supports anti-motherhood social attitudes and policies and limits respect for women's citizenship".<ref name=NWSA>{{Cite journal|last=Oaks |first=Laury |year=Spring 2009 |title=What Are Pro-Life Feminists Doing on Campus? |journal=[[NWSA Journal]] |volume= 21|issue= 1|pages=178–203 |url= http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/nwsa_journal/v021/21.1.oaks.pdf|doi=|pmid= |pmc= |issn=1040-0656}}</ref> Laury Oaks, Associate Professor of Feminist Studies at the [[University of California, Santa Barbara]], writes that when abortion is legal, pro-life feminists believe, "women come to see pregnancy and parenting as obstacles to full participation in education and the workplace."<ref name=NWSA/> Pro-life feminist activism in Ireland is, if anything, more "pro-mother" than "pro-woman".<ref name="Oaks2000"/> Oaks notes that while Irish abortion opponents |
Pro-life feminists believe that the legal option of abortion "supports anti-motherhood social attitudes and policies and limits respect for women's citizenship".<ref name=NWSA>{{Cite journal|last=Oaks |first=Laury |year=Spring 2009 |title=What Are Pro-Life Feminists Doing on Campus? |journal=[[NWSA Journal]] |volume= 21|issue= 1|pages=178–203 |url= http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/nwsa_journal/v021/21.1.oaks.pdf|doi=|pmid= |pmc= |issn=1040-0656}}</ref> Laury Oaks, Associate Professor of Feminist Studies at the [[University of California, Santa Barbara]], writes that when abortion is legal, pro-life feminists believe, "women come to see pregnancy and parenting as obstacles to full participation in education and the workplace."<ref name=NWSA/> Pro-life feminist activism in Ireland is, if anything, more "pro-mother" than "pro-woman".<ref name="Oaks2000"/> Oaks notes that while Irish abortion opponents valorize child-bearing and are critical of the notion that women have "a 'right' to an identity beyond motherhood", some, such as [[Breda O'Brien]], founder of Feminists for Life Ireland, also offer feminist-inspired arguments that women's contributions to society are not limited to such functions.<ref name="Oaks2000"/> |
||
Pro-life feminist organizations generally do not distinguish between views on abortion as a legal issue, abortion as a moral issue, and abortion as a medical procedure.<ref name=NWSA/> Such distinctions are made by many women, for example, women who would not abort their own pregnancies but would prefer that abortion remain legal.<ref name=NWSA/> Irish pro-life feminists present themselves as [[apolitical]] and consider abortion at a strictly social level, thus leaving the question of whether women should have the ''legal'' right to abortion unanswered.<ref name="Oaks2000"/> |
Pro-life feminist organizations generally do not distinguish between views on abortion as a legal issue, abortion as a moral issue, and abortion as a medical procedure.<ref name=NWSA/> Such distinctions are made by many women, for example, women who would not abort their own pregnancies but would prefer that abortion remain legal.<ref name=NWSA/> Irish pro-life feminists present themselves as [[apolitical]] and consider abortion at a strictly social level, thus leaving the question of whether women should have the ''legal'' right to abortion unanswered.<ref name="Oaks2000"/> |
||
Revision as of 21:20, 3 April 2012
| Part of a series on |
| Feminism |
|---|
.svg) |
 Feminism portal |
Pro-life feminism is the opposition to abortion by a group of feminists who believe that the principles which inform their support of women's rights also call them to support the right to life of prenatal humans. Pro-life feminists believe abortion has served to hurt women more than it has benefited them.
The pro-life feminist movement began to take shape in the early to mid 1970s following the foundation of Feminists for Life (FFL) in the United States and Women for Life in Great Britain.[1] FFL and the Susan B. Anthony List (SBA List) are the most prominent pro-life feminist organizations in the United States.
Views and goals
Pro-life feminists believe that the legal option of abortion "supports anti-motherhood social attitudes and policies and limits respect for women's citizenship".[2] Laury Oaks, Associate Professor of Feminist Studies at the University of California, Santa Barbara, writes that when abortion is legal, pro-life feminists believe, "women come to see pregnancy and parenting as obstacles to full participation in education and the workplace."[2] Pro-life feminist activism in Ireland is, if anything, more "pro-mother" than "pro-woman".[1] Oaks notes that while Irish abortion opponents valorize child-bearing and are critical of the notion that women have "a 'right' to an identity beyond motherhood", some, such as Breda O'Brien, founder of Feminists for Life Ireland, also offer feminist-inspired arguments that women's contributions to society are not limited to such functions.[1]
Pro-life feminist organizations generally do not distinguish between views on abortion as a legal issue, abortion as a moral issue, and abortion as a medical procedure.[2] Such distinctions are made by many women, for example, women who would not abort their own pregnancies but would prefer that abortion remain legal.[2] Irish pro-life feminists present themselves as apolitical and consider abortion at a strictly social level, thus leaving the question of whether women should have the legal right to abortion unanswered.[1]
Prominent American pro-life feminist organizations seek to end abortion in the U.S. The SBA List states this as their "ultimate goal",[3] and FFL founder Serrin Foster said that FFL "opposes abortion in all cases because violence is a violation of basic feminist principles".[2][4]
At the same time, there are pro-life feminists who focus on making abortion obsolete by relieving its root causes at every level of society from the individual to the global—for example, from personally providing direct aid to pregnant women, adopting children with disabilities, campaigning for global access to antiretrovirals, and by advocating women's economic justice worldwide.[citation needed]
Relationship to other movements
The tenets of pro-life feminism have been rejected by mainstream feminists who hold that "the moral and legal right to control her fertility remains a dominant feminist position."[2] Mainstream feminists still feel that, for full participation in society, the individual woman should be able to decide when and if she has children.[2] This conflicts with pro-life feminism which is against abortion at its foundation.[2] From their minority position, pro-life feminists say mainstream feminists do not speak for all women.[2]
Having failed to gain a respected position within traditional feminism,[2] pro-life feminists have aligned themselves with other anti-abortion, "right to life" groups. This placement sets them against the feminist movement, and erodes the sense of an identity separate from other pro-life groups, despite the pro-life feminist "pro-woman" arguments that are distinct from the "fetal rights" arguments put forward by others.[2]
19th-century feminists
Feminist pro-life groups say they are continuing the tradition of 19th century women's rights activists such as Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Matilda Joslyn Gage, Victoria Woodhull, Elizabeth Blackwell, and Alice Paul who considered abortion to be an evil forced upon women by men.[5][6][7] In their newspaper, The Revolution, they published letters, essays and editorials debating many issues of the day, including articles decrying "child murder" and "infanticide."[5]
A dispute about Anthony's abortion views arose in the late 20th century: pro-life feminists in the U.S. began using Anthony's words and image to promote their pro-life cause. Scholars of 19th-century American feminism, as well as pro-choice activists, countered what they considered a co-opting of Anthony's legacy as America's most dedicated suffragist, saying that the pro-life activists are falsely attributing opinions to Anthony and also that applying words from the 19th century to the modern abortion debate is misleading.[8]
References
- ^ a b c d Oaks, Laury (2000). "'Pro-Woman, Pro-Life'? The Emergence of Pro-Life Feminism in Irish Anti-Abortion Discourses and Practices". Irish Journal of Feminist Studies. 4 (1): 73–90.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Oaks, Laury (Spring 2009). "What Are Pro-Life Feminists Doing on Campus?" (PDF). NWSA Journal. 21 (1): 178–203. ISSN 1040-0656.
- ^ "SBA List Mission: Advancing, Mobilizing and Representing Pro-Life Women". Susan B. Anthony List. 2008. Retrieved October 18, 2010.
To accomplish our ultimate goal of ending abortion in this country...
- ^ The Nation. August 11, 2005. Katha Pollitt. Reproductive Rights. Feminists for (Fetal) Life: subject to debate. Retrieved on May 11, 2009.
- ^ a b Kate O'Beirne, excerpt from 'Women Who Make the World Worse: and How Their Radical Feminist Assault Is Ruining Our Schools, Families, Military, and Sports' National Review January 23, 2006. Archived from the original on February 3, 2006. Retrieved on March 30, 2012
- ^ SBA List – Early Suffragists
- ^ "Abortion and the early feminists". BBC. Retrieved March 31, 2012.
- ^ Stevens, Allison (2006-10-06). "Susan B. Anthony's Abortion Position Spurs Scuffle". Women's eNews. Retrieved 2009-11-21.
Further reading
- The Cost of 'Choice': Women Evaluate the Impact of Abortion edited by Erika Bachiochi (2004, ISBN 1-59403-051-0)
- Prolife Feminism Yesterday & Today. Second & greatly expanded edition. Edited by Derr, Naranjo-Huebl, & MacNair (2005, ISBN 1-4134-9576-1)
- Prolife Feminism Yesterday & Today. edited by Derr, Naranjo-Huebl, and MacNair (1995, ISBN 0-945819-62-5)
- Pro-Life Feminism: Different Voices edited by Gail Grenier-Sweet (1985, ISBN 0-919225-22-5)
- Swimming Against the Tide: Feminist Dissent on the Issue of Abortion edited by Angela Kennedy (1997, ISBN 1-85182-267-4)
