User talk:A75

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello A75! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! --Nishkid64 00:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

WikiProject: Aircraft[edit]

Hey, A75. I see you editing a lot of pages on Wikipedia that are a lot of the same pages I am working on. I was wondering if you were aware of the WikiProject Aircraft and the basic standards they have for aircraft articles and layouts. I remember that you said you are a fan of Aviation (on my "Talk" page) and would like to see you become a part of this team. It may also help you avoid conflicts with other editors on Wikipedia. (Born2flie 23:29, 15 September 2006 (UTC))[reply]

A75, I apologize for any disagreement I had with you. Like the Pirate Code in Pirates of the Carribean the WP:Air guidelines aren't really guidelines but rather ideas on how it "could" be if you have no ideas of your own. You have ideas, so those guidelines aren't really applicable to you. Again, I apologize for discouraging you. (Born2flie 15:43, 29 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]
Thanks, hey dont worry about it. I appreciate the thought though, wiki is quite a wild place. A75 16:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of military aircraft of the United States[edit]

Hello A75. I was the person who made some changes, including those about the T-48 to -50, to that article under anonymous IP 213.61.105.154. My primary source for these (and other) U.S. military designations are official nomenclature records of the US Department of Defense. My website is http://www.designation-systems.net/ (which has been listed for some time as an external source for the Wiki article) has some pages about new or "unknown" designations. Andreas Parsch 09:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

X-35 page[edit]

Good work on starting the X-35 page. I also have a version on Talk:Lockheed Martin X-35 that I have been working on, and I merged a few section together. The text on the talk page is wholesale from the F-35 page, but I included most of the development of the X-35 and JSF program from the F-35, with theintent of taking those parts out of the F-35 article, to allow it to concentrate on the fight itself. Feel free to chnage anyhting on the regular X-35 back to the way you had it. I adjusted the pics, but until we add more text, the placemant won't be right.

I am going to try to ubdate the specs to the aero-specs template. I need to know your source for your specs so I can include it in the template. Thanks. - BillCJ 23:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I only noticed the prior discussions about forking afterword- I see great wiki-minds think alike! I look forward to seeing new content onto the (currently) basic X-35 content. I think your additions are great- as for the specs, they are from a older (wiki) F-35 article so you might want to just start over. A75 20:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese[edit]

Per all the JSDF links in Japanese you posted on the F-2, do you read Japanese? - BillCJ 04:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

T2V SeaStar[edit]

Just curious as to why you moved the page to T-1 SeaStar. GIven tha the aircraft left front-line carrier service in 1960, isn't it more appropriate to cover in under that designation? The fact that the Jayhawk is also a T-1 also agues in favor of using the unique designation. You can discuss on the Talk:T-1 Seastar if you'd like, but I thought I'd try a personal message first. Not trying to be argumentative here, just interested in your reasons, as they my be better thatn mine! - BillCJ 22:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Based it on total career time. A75 23:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I should add, either name (for the page) is fine with me. A75 12:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Century Series[edit]

Your change [1] to the opening paragraph seems to be saying that "Century Series" is a generic term for any series of similar U.S. combat aircraft, not just specifically the F-100 to 106. In particular, the phrasing "stems from" indicates that the original meaning gave way to a different current meaning.

Is this so? I've never heard the term applied to anything but the original. If Century Series has been applied to other group, are there any examples? Otherwise, I think the original introduction is more concise and clearer. -- Paul Richter 07:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Helicopter template[edit]

Hi A75 - The template you've been altering is part of an group of templates that WikiProject Aircraft uses to provide navigation within designation sequences. The changes you are making are at odds with how these templates are organised. If you'd like to suggest some changes, you should first look here under "5.1 Designation Sequence Footers", and then take the matter up on the project's talk page. Cheers --Rlandmann (talk) 23:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will leave that project stuff up to you though- I can only comment on what know about the designation systems. I am sorry for the stir, I have left my reasons on the template page there. Thanks for the feedback though. A75 (talk) 23:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. No-one's going to have a problem with you correcting links; but the Army and Navy sequences and the tri-service sequence all have their own templates since they're distinct from the US(A)AF designations, so these need to be removed. There's also no need to separate the R- and H- sequences, any more than we separate the fighter P- and F- sequences. --Rlandmann (talk) 23:36, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I had a look at those table, it is quite confusing mess there! I think what I am proposing is having 1 template for the three, or at least correcting the sequences. For instance the under the 1962 Tri-Service system, there not 6 designations, but rather the 1962 redesignations, plus dozens more! A75 (talk) 23:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah I see what your getting at. Think about this though, not all of R series were redesignated with H, so it makes it easier to see which ones were. But it gets even more important for the 1962 Designations, because those follow a different designation format as well, and the USAF series ends at 43. So with this table, for something like the UH-1, then XH-40, HU-1, and UH-1 can all be blacked out and see at once on the same template. A75 (talk) 23:44, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's simply no need to combine the three, since there's no limit to the number of templates that can be applied to the one article, allowing the reader to expand or collapse as many (or as few) as they're interested in. Point taken about the tri-service designations; but each template should only show a distinct numerical sequence. --Rlandmann (talk) 23:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fair enough, I will just work on each template then, so it has the correct sequence for its designation system. Thanks again. 00:00, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

I sense that you are perhaps misunderstanding what the templates are intended to illustrate; which is the numerical sequence that the particular aircraft belongs in. They are not intended (demonstrably) to represent every designation issued under the system; they are intended to answer "if this is the FOO-4, then what were the FOO-3 and FOO-5??" Rather than altering templates so that they no longer match how the rest of our content is organised, a better solution would be for you to come up with better titles for the templates that you feel are problematic. --Rlandmann (talk) 00:12, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually pretty happy right now! I can see your point about the standards. For instance I agree the three templates allow more flexiblity, and the R/F thing I can live with. The only thing I would like to see is the USAF series end at 43, due that being the last USAF designation and because the 1962 series have a different format. Its not very well known, but the 1962 helicopters series are supposed to have the modified mission prefix! Either way, I want to say thanks for taking the time to explain your position and having a discussion about this. A75 (talk) 00:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am also warning you that you are now in violation of the Three-revert rule and may be blocked. I am requesting that you restore the {{USAF helicopters}} template to the state it was in before you last edited it, or better still, restore the sequence to how it was, but add a more accurate title to the template. --Rlandmann (talk) 00:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will try to fix this! A75 (talk) 00:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - and no arguments here about the inclusion of the MM prefix. Perhaps {{US helicopters}} is better titled something like "Helicopters redesignated under the 1962 tri-service designation system"? --Rlandmann (talk) 00:35, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I am a bit worried I will fix the wrong thing so here is what I will try to do. Right now, there is only 2 main changes- The "USAF template" goes up to 43, and the template "US helicopters" includes the Joint service designations past 43 plus the redesignation, plus new designations (such as [2] those helicopters). If I understand you right, you want the post 1962 designations to continue on the USAF 1941-1962 template, so people can see the numbers (past 42)(and then make the titles fit). Ok, I will see if I can manage this! Thanks again for helping me work this out. A75 (talk) 00:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep - that's about it! {{USAF helicopters}} should show (only) the sequence running from R-1 through to UH-72, and {{US helicopters}} (only) the sequence from AH-1/UH-1 through to OH-6; with whatever template titles and other explanatory notes you think will help. And it's no problem - thank you for your willingness to jump in and straighten out the MM- prefixes, and more, generally, improve these templates! --Rlandmann (talk) 01:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, unfortunately I think I only managed part of it. I don't know how to do the second one, because 1-6 were not the only redesignations (check out (http://www.designation-systems.net/usmilav/1962redesignations.html). See, if I just have 1-6 it is not all the Navy or Army redesignations, but it is also not a new sequence either. The later numbers such as 13, 21, etc. were also redesignations, but any new helos were added on the end of the sequence (e.g 71, 72,..). So it won't make sense as a counting sequence (e.g. foo-1 foo-2), and it won't be all the redesignations either! The only solution I have so far is to leave 1-6 redesignations on the first template, and all the 1962 redesignations plus 46 and up on the second. Either we have really weird title, and exclude a few redesignations or think of something else. A75 (talk) 02:11, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Much better now! A few more nits on {{USAF helicopters}}:

  1. The closing note is superfluous: {{USN fighters}} doesn't point out that USAAC/USAAF/USAF fighters aren't included. The title you've supplied is quite explicit that these are only "air force" and tri-service designations; there really is no confusion here.
  2. The template still includes the AH-1/UH-1 through OH-6; so when you remove them, a better use of that closing note would be to revise it to say something like "those aircraft that received a redesignation in 1962 are not included". You can even link directly to the other template with [[:Template:US helicopters]] rather than just to the article on the designation system if you like. --Rlandmann (talk) 01:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I think I'll just take out that extra note on the first one and I like that idea of linking to the other template. However, I have not figured out how to handle 1-6 yet (check out other reply). Cheers. A75 (talk) 02:11, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I had the wrong link, [3] is the one I meant. In the meantime I tried out that template link (looks pretty good!) A75 (talk) 02:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simple: the AH-1/UH-1 through OH-6 designations were all-new designations created in 1962 to replace existing Army and Navy designations, as opposed to attaching a prefix to an existing Air Force designation. Actually, the more we talk about it, the more convinced I am that your approach is a better way to handle this. I'll modify the template a little - let me know what you think? --Rlandmann (talk) 03:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problem there is that UH-1 to OH-6 were not the only all new designations either, the CH-46, CH-47, CH-48, CH-50 were also all-new redesignations (using new numbers as well as letters). A75 (talk) 03:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better? I'm not married to the wording, but I think it gets the idea across - feel free to improve. --Rlandmann (talk) 04:11, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think we are headed in the right direction;I will take another crack at it. I need to fix the matter of the CH-46,47,etc. also being all-new designations, but I don't want move them so I think I may try a different split up. Here goes nothing! Cheers A75 (talk) 04:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I gave up trying to find a way to isolate the 1-6 and put the break between the joint service system and the old usaf ones. It loses some continuity, but it allows all the new designations to fit. Im going to take a break from this for a bit. Thanks again and good luck. A75 (talk) 05:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have left a message on the template talk about modified mission prefixes and why I think it is confusing to the user. MilborneOne (talk) 09:12, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I have left a response there. 16:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

File:AFG-070605-002.jpg[edit]

Just to let you know that I recently copied the above image that you uploaded to Wikipedia over to WikiMedia Commons, the Wikimedia central media repository for all free media. The image had been tagged with the {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} template. Your image is now available to all Wikimedia projects at the following location: Commons:File:F22 Raptor info.jpg. During the move I changed the name of the image to better reflect Naming Conventions policy, duplicate file name and/or Commons naming restrictions. The article that contained the image has been updated to reflect the new name as it exists now on Commons. The original version of the image uploaded to Wikipedia has been tagged with WP:CSD#F8. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 18:43, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:AFG-070605-002.jpg[edit]

File:AFG-070605-002.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:F22 Raptor info.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:F22 Raptor info.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited French Frigate Shoals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mercedes-Benz GLC-Class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transmission. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 26 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sears Dreadnought, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guggenheim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sears Dreadnought, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guggenheim Museum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello A75,

You are invited to join WikiProject Motorcycling. We work together to improve motorcycling related articles. We focus on things like the most popular motorcycling articles, recognizing and improving new articles, historically important motorcycles, and more. Please share your ideas, suggestions, and questions at WikiProject Motorcycling.

For even more ways you could contribute, click [show] to see the To do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorcycling:
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

WikiProject Motorcycling

To show your membership, you may care to include one of the following templates on your user page
{{User WP Motorcycling}}
This user is a member of
WikiProject Motorcycling.
{{User WikiProject Motorcycling}}
This user is a participant in WikiProject Motorcycling.
Adding {{Article alerts columns|Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorcycling/Article alerts}} to your user page will display current motorcycling discussions and proposals. Or add Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorcycling/Article alerts to your watchlist.

Disambiguation link notification for April 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of motorcycles of the 1930s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sale. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject Motorcycling[edit]

Hello A75,

You are invited to join WikiProject Motorcycling. We work together to improve motorcycling related articles. We focus on things like the most popular motorcycling articles, recognizing and improving new articles, historically important motorcycles, and more. Please share your ideas, suggestions, and questions at WikiProject Motorcycling.

For even more ways you could contribute, click [show] to see the To do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorcycling:
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

WikiProject Motorcycling

To show your membership, you may care to include one of the following templates on your user page
{{User WP Motorcycling}}
This user is a member of
WikiProject Motorcycling.
{{User WikiProject Motorcycling}}
This user is a participant in WikiProject Motorcycling.
Adding {{Article alerts columns|Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorcycling/Article alerts}} to your user page will display current motorcycling discussions and proposals. Or add Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorcycling/Article alerts to your watchlist.

--Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dennis, thanks for the invitation to your project. I have been editing a lot of motorcycle articles lately, so I guess it makes sense to join you guys for now as long as there is not a lot of requirements. Thanks A75 (talk) 11:45, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So now, welcome to the Motorcycling WikiProject. Hopefully you have a good time, start many new articles and can contribute lots to the existing ones as we need that. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 12:05, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi and welcome. I usually contribute via the username Brianhe; this is my alternate account. I noticed you are adding "see also" links; you might want to review the guidelines at WP:SEEALSO. It's kind of important for consistent style across articles not to duplicate links that are already in the article body. In the past I've removed links that are in navboxes, but lately haven't been doing so because I have read that the navboxes don't show up for mobile users. Anyway, glad to see you contributing to project-related articles. – Brianhe.public (talk) 00:25, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Brianhe! A75 (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Horseless carriage may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ~bbott/cars/carhist.htm What Was The First Car? A Quick History of the Automobile for Young People]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of ultra-light sport vehicles of the 2010s for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ultra-light sport vehicles of the 2010s is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ultra-light sport vehicles of the 2010s until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 10:25, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, A75. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of motorcycles with sidecars for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of motorcycles with sidecars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of motorcycles with sidecars until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:05, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, A75. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercedes-Benz S-Class (W220), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alcantara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, A75. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, A75. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited French Frigate Shoals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bark. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pearl and Hermes Atoll[edit]

Hi, I'm sorry to do this, but I intend to revert the changes you've made to the article today. The images you've substituted for the ones I placed are less informative/less clear than the originals (particularly the black-footed albatross and monk seal photos), and the sections you've added about red algae and the list of islets are redundant to information already in the article. If you intend to make more significant changes to the article, can we please discuss them first? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced them with actual images from the Pearl and Hermes atoll, whereas the previous images are from other places. A75 (talk) 20:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but they are less clear images of the specific animals in question, which is more important. We are not showing the user the scenery, we are showing them what the plants and animals look like. Lepidium bidentatum isn't mentioned in the text, but you're including a photo of it, which is confusing to the reader. If you have sourced content that discusses Lepidium bidentatum on the island, you should include it, and then we can discuss changing the image. Please don't re-replace these images without discussing it. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited La Perouse Pinnacle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nightfall.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Thespooknav[edit]

Template:Thespooknav has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 15:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Compact of Free Association into Wake Island. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In that case intended to just re-use the source in an orginal sentence, so it would not be needed. I can see one sentence fragment remained close so thanks for making a note. A75 (talk) 13:56, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northern Mariana Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rota.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This has been corrected. A75 (talk) 18:44, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Pacific Island contributions[edit]

Hi A75! I appreciate your recent contributions to articles about U.S. Pacific island territories. You seem to have a great passion for the subject. I have a couple of suggestions that might help improve your contributions in the future. I noticed that you provide references as Wikipedia:Bare URLs. That's generally not the best way to cite sources. Have a look at Help:Referencing for beginners for a few templates you can use to provide a bit more information about the sources you've consulted. Also, please read over your contributions for spelling and grammar. Mistakes happen, but I've noticed that your contributions tend to have a high volume of misspellings and missing words. Leaving those errors makes more work for other people, so please try to proofread your work and correct mistakes before you move on to other articles. Thank again for having so much interest in the Pacific islands topic space. Happy editing! CoatGuy2 (talk) 18:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for stoping by, I will try to make some corrections later but it takes time hopefully the major issues can get sorted out in time. A75 (talk) 18:35, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Remember: There's WP:NOHURRY here at the Wikipedia. Taking time to ensure the quality of the text, including all words spelled correctly, when you write it the first time, will make for a higher-quality result and less work left for other editors. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 23:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Airbus Helicopters[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Airbus Helicopters, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Airbus Helicopters[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Airbus Helicopters, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on NHIndustries NH90[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page NHIndustries NH90, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Wake Island[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Wake Island, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Typos[edit]

Please slow down and check your content before saving. You are leaving way too many typos in articles you work on, particularly Wake Island. At some point, because editors get tired of having to do massive cleanups of others' work, they may begin starting discussions to remove your editing privileges. I asked nicely before, and now I'm insisting. Check your work before saving. And please read WP:CIR. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 01:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I have added a spell checker, but it does not always work on the large sections. I will take recommendations, I notice a lot use automated tools to fix things like this, part of the problem is I have to use either the edit source or the visual editor, but not all my automated tools work on both. The spell check does not work in the visual editor to add references, and the spell checker has to use small sections of the other one but does not have the automated reference. There is no need for others to jump in so quickly, part of how I ended up with so many edits is I have gone back to try to find spelling errors or wordings already. There is another issue is that many of the articles have glaring omissions of facts, which triggers the cycle anew. I think it is going to be possible to address these issues, as I have already been trying to get the typos under control. I will give the article a break for sure, unless it is a simple typo or image for example. A75 (talk) 12:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK I checked the article and I see, I would have corrected those spelling errors In the new section, I simply ran out of time. However, your note for "Clarify" I dont understand. It is clearly referring to the submarine Triton, which is described just a couple sentences prior. The Triton and Tambor were two submarines on patrol near Wake. I would also make a counter request, that from time to time add more content to the articles. One reason I was even editing is that many articles are extremely incomplete and have factual errors. For example, the article on the Wake rail, has for over a decade said there is no Rails on Peale, but there is even photos of them living on Peale. Thanks for your communications and corrections of course, and I am fine listening to some friendly advice. A75 (talk) 12:49, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Amelia Earhart into Howland Island. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I tried to make it clear in this edit summary https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Howland_Island&oldid=1186641207. A75 (talk) 22:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's not the edit that got flagged, so I missed it. Sorry for the mistake. — Diannaa (talk) 00:45, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of U.S. DoD aircraft designations for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of U.S. DoD aircraft designations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of U.S. DoD aircraft designations (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ZLEA T\C 20:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, A75. Thank you for your work on Wilkes Island. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! A75 (talk) 16:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link[edit]

Hey A75, can you double check the link you added here? I'm getting an error. Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 13:09, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The original link is ok but the automatic citation generator makes a broke link. The original source was here https://www.history.navy.mil/content/history/museums/nmusn/explore/photography/wwii/wwii-pacific/us-entry-into-wwii-japanese-offensive/1941-december-8-capture-uss-wake.html I just used a different source, as its a common fact about these two ships. A75 (talk) 14:25, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Huh, I wonder why that happened. I always just type in the citation templates manually, but I've been doing it for 15+ years so it's second nature to me. Thanks for taking a look! Parsecboy (talk) 14:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Fokker Super Universal[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fokker Super Universal, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:35, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Fokker Super Universal[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fokker Super Universal, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:38, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Fokker F.III[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fokker F.III, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Helicopter procurements[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Helicopter procurements indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to delete, it was superseded category Helicopter procurement programs. A75 (talk) 23:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:A75&oldid=1217626887"