User talk:Geschichte/2021-2024

I will usually reply on this page only.

Archives:

Hoax

Hello! Following the deletion of hoax article, could you please restore the article in order to add it to this page. Thanks.--Renvoy (talk) 11:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not all entries in the list are recreations and I frankly don't see the point. As for the dates it was created as a draft on 18 December 2019 and existed in the main space since 28 March 2020. Geschichte (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unexplained revert

Could you explain your reverts? (Next time, please explein beforehand). -DePiep (talk) 09:58, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong speedy deletion criterion. Please find a fitting criterion Geschichte (talk) 09:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong? Deleting a page I have personally ~edited out of use, made superfluous and unused, why are you questioning this? -DePiep (talk)

In nominating for G8 you claimed that it was "dependent on a non-existent page", which it is not? Geschichte (talk) 10:04, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to be as specific as possible in the speedy criterion, as the page is not transcluded any more by intention. But alas, I'll make it generic G6 for the parent, and will wait silently till afterwards G8 applies for the subs. To serve hairsplitters. -DePiep (talk) 10:10, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are normal deletion processes as well- Why was it so important to speedy it? Geschichte (talk) 10:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Because the page is unused by intention & new design. As I wrote above @10:03 (lol has no timestamp?!). In fact, its data job is now perfomed by a dedicated module. Is there a reason to scrutinise my requests this micrographic? Never met such questions in similar situations. -DePiep (talk) 10:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say, you could confirm by now right? See Template:P-phrases/text‎‎. -DePiep (talk) 10:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CSD G13s

Hello, Geschichte,

I found four drafts that 1989 improperly tagged for CSD G13 speedy deletion. They tagged them months before they were eligible for deletion so I have restored them. They look like they went on CSD tagging binge this morning and tagged 68 pages over a few hours even though they have not been a regular CSD page tagger since 2019. I'm going to spot check some other pages on their CSD log to make sure they were properly tagged.

We have several admins working with the daily list of expiring drafts so, please, if you see pages tagged G13, look over the page history and make sure they are eligible. Thank you! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:19, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Witching Season

Hello, Geschichte,

I saw you recently deleted some articles that were PROD'd. Could you take care of this one? I placed the proposed deletion tag on it so I don't feel comfortable deleting it myself. It came due over 12 hours ago but no one seems to be patrolling User:DumbBOT/ProdSummary recently, they must be off doing fun, weekend activities. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh U20 team fixtures

So can I add the match stats from 2019 since those are the teams most recent fixtures?FNH004 (talk) 12:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please consult the pages about the senior national teams; the recent fixtures header should include games from one year in the past. Geschichte (talk) 13:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tomme Tønner for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Tomme Tønner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomme Tønner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Geschichte, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:56, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just an addendum, a recent RFC passed that removed the autopatrolled user right from the administrator toolkit. As you have created over 20,000 pages, I believe it would be wise to grant you the autopatrolled user right. If you would like it removed, feel free to ping me or post a message on my talk page. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

The article Kjartan Antonsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 22:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Momir Mileta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 22:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pétur Björn Jónsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 22:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jonas Lind has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 22:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mikael Blomberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 22:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Patrik Bengtsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 22:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mikael Blomberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikael Blomberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–dlthewave ☎ 20:52, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonas Lind is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonas Lind until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–dlthewave ☎ 20:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Geschichte!

Happy New Year!

Geschichte,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 13:04, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Nomination for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oskar Hordnes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oskar Hordnes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aksel Fugelli is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aksel Fugelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dimitris Farantos

Hello, I noticed when you created Dimitris Farantos you listed him as a "retired football midfielder". However, I see no information on his career in the given sources, is it correct that he is a former player? S.A. Julio (talk) 16:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for picking this up. It must have been wrongly inserted, so I removed mentions of it. Geschichte (talk) 19:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Torgeir Garmo

The article Torgeir Garmo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP about someone who fails WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TartarTorte 15:30, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian film

I saw on another editors page that you have an interest in improving articles about Norwegian film. I don't know many Norwegian films but I greatly enjoyed Headhunters (film) and it could certainly do with a few more reviews of all kinds (and I'm fairly sure I added the single solitary review from Roger Ebert). If you could include a couple of reviews from reputable Norwegian critics to provide a local perspective that would be excellent. -- 109.78.197.54 (talk) 16:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll format it in the same way as on the other film - 12 reviews as a starting point! Geschichte (talk) 21:09, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. -- 109.78.197.54 (talk) 00:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Football stubs

Hello, Geschichte,

I look at a daily draftication list and noticed that many football stubs by Das osmnezz that you moved to Draft space, were immediately moved back. I don't know whether or not the players meet the football standards for notability but I thought I'd let you know. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:04, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing relisted AFDs

Please remove Category:Relisted AfD debates from AFDs when closing them, as this category is only meant to track active discussions. Having to go through dozens of these on more than one occasion is not fun. ✗plicit 12:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly thought this was done by a bot? Geschichte (talk) 16:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like here. When did it cease? Geschichte (talk) 20:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Zhu (violinist) fixed recommended changes and thanks′

I don't know if a User's wikipedia talk page is appropriate for this but I would like to apologize for my comments regarding : "I don't see there is any argument made against my article?" at the deletion discussion page as it is wrong to assume that an article is 'mine' and I wrote that unknowing if the author of a wikipedia article could have a say in the discussion and guessing if I was in the wrong, someone would call me out for it. I would also like to thank you for the suggests of the Kevin Zhu article that I have now implmented into the article. JeffreyViolin (talk) 1:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm happy for you that it was kept. Geschichte (talk) 09:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASikonmina&type=revision&diff=1066207984&oldid=1066123237 What do you think? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems a little fishy. Do you have any particular previous user in mind? Geschichte (talk) 16:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One of the other editors on the new account's Talk page said he did recognise someone who had been blocked, Atlantic I think, but he did not say who and was blanked by the new account. Just prior to your own message. The first edits make it clear that this is an account with previous history. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aksel

I have added the information about Aksel Kankaanranta’s charting song to his article. Please take a look.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of JBAND$

Hello there, good morning Geschichte,

I saw you recently deleted my article. Can you please undelete the article so i can get back to work, it shouldn't have been deleted. Even though it was visible that the page had bits of information being added to it at a time, two days after the article was created the page was flagged for WP:PROD and instead of suggesting improvements or contributing the editor further flagged it for WP:AFD. That's borderline vandalism. Nobody contested the article for that 7 day period because improvement edits were being made, when it was time for the discussion to be closed it was relisted by yourself. Later, an editor contributed to the discussion making a personal attack against the person in the article which shouldn't be taken up with me but it was still counted as a contribution which leads me on to say that 3 biased opinions shouldn't count as a voting system resulting in a snowball clause by closing the AfD a day early. I assume as you know when a wikipedia article is created, deleting it is last resort unless it is a personal attack page, spam, copyright violation or promotion and that would lead to speedy deletion which this page was ineligible for as you already know. Thanks! I just came here to follow wiki guidelines instead of deletion review. Kind regards. GsB0414 (Talk) 02:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can draftify it for you, however I just want you to grasp how Wikipedia works before I do so. For one, you were fully eligible to contribute to the deletion discussion, but did not do so, nor to any discussion, instead you have just removed everything from your talk page. The AFD was not closed a day early, it was closed after 13 days instead of 7 days which is the normal procedure. Deletion is not a last resort in those cases only, there is a number of other guidelines which articles are measured against, see for instance all the listings at WP:AFD/Yesterday. After you reply sommething to this, I will draftify it for you. Geschichte (talk) 07:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the first WP:PROD from my talk page a couple days after because it was messy. With the first discussion i didn't input anything because i thought it was conflict of interest until i read the guidelines and when it was relisted i clicked edit and it told me that i'm banned for a certain amount of days. Also, because the AFD was relisted, i thought it would have gone another 7 days. Nevertheless, i understand what you are saying. Thank-you. Kind regards. GsB0414 (Talk) 22:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You GsB0414 have never been blocked, so maybe you used an IP which is blocked? Several school and public library IPs tend to be blocked. Geschichte (talk) 07:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have now restored it to Draft:JBAND$. Please note that the article is currently very far from being acceptable at Wikipedia. Frankly, JBAND$ really has not done anything to distinguish himself in the music world. Primary sources as well as references which are not about JBAND$, do not count towards the goal of the article, which is to show that JBAND$ has got significant and independent attention from reliable sources. Geschichte (talk) 08:04, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Rose Deletion

Hi Geschichte. Hope you are keeping well. I observe you deleted article on Ronald Rose. The position held by him is considered reputed as he is also a bureaucrat. He did lot of activities in places he served. Can I know the reasons behind deletion. thank you. Gardenkur (talk) 11:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted not due to my personal opinion, but because a deletion discussion was opened for the article. The discussion ended and deletion was the result as per Wikipedia:SOFTDELETE. While it is possible to create the article again, I strongly advise not to include bullet lists of every activity he has ever done. It violates the rule Wikipedia:NOTCV. Instead, try to focus and explain why he is an important bureaucrat. Geschichte (talk) 12:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Matias Moldskred to Matias Belli Moldskred

Geschichte, I was wondering why you redirected the page I created, Matias Moldskred, to Matias Belli Moldskred, because the latter was created a full day after I created the former. On top of that, couldn't my page just be edited instead of redirected? Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 08:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Having the Belli name in the article title was important since he was notable as a Nicaragua international and was using his Nicaraguan name Belli in that context. Also, as one had to be merged into the other, there was little to merge from Matias Moldskred, barely anything, mostly just the categories. Therefore, the solution was better for content attribution. Geschichte (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frank Tandberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Tandberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Tandberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Garnet (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the thank yous!

Dearest Geschichte, thank you so much for the love you have shown me for the articles I have recently started, you are indeed very kind! Sincerest regards, Spinster300 (talk) 06:58, 6 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Mario Cerrito AfD

Hi, Geschichte. I only just noticed your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Cerrito (2nd nomination), and I was wondering if you'd reconsider it, or at least would add a closing rationale. The way I see it:

I moved to delete
Summerlee44 !voted keep, but was blocked as a sockpuppet by the time you closed
Alansohn !voted keep
Oaktree b !voted delete
2601:8D:8700:5E10:D5E0:983D:E9A4:B0E8 !voted keep, but was blocked as a sockpuppet by the time you closed
Roman Spinner !voted keep, but acknowledged having been canvassed by one of the sockpuppets. He argued that the canvassing didn't matter since he always !votes keep, which I don't think is as persuasive an argument as he thinks for his !vote to be counted.
Lamona !voted weak keep
Saiskysat !voted keep. This was Saiskysat's 24th ever edit, their first in 2 and a half years, and their only ever edit to projectspace.

Thus if you discount the two sock !votes, the canvassed !vote, and the very suspicious !vote from a long-dormant account, it comes down to two delete, one keep, one weak keep. If your reading of the strength of the arguments, across those four !votes, is that there is nonetheless a consensus to keep, then I'm open to hearing that, but respectfully I don't think this is a case where a one-word keep close is sufficient. Preferable, I think, would be a relist with the sock !votes struck, or a close as no consensus. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 05:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Cerrito

Hello, this is Mario Cerrito. I am a little upset about what just happened. As a working artist and businessman your name means a lot. I am currently casting for a new movie and was just informed this morning by an actors agent after he "googled me" that my wikipedia is facing deletion. He asked me why. As embarrassing as it was when he asked me, I didn't know how to respond. What is irritating me the worst is after researching the history on the article it was JUST nominated for deletion and passed as "keep." As much as I don't know about wikipedia I started doing some research/reading and found under (Wikipedia: Renominating for Deletion) it states : If the XfD discussion was closed as “keep”, generally do not renominate the page for at least six months, unless there is something new to say, and even so, usually wait a few months. After checking it has literally been a matter of 5 days and a page about me has the deletion tag again and it is not right. I can read above that Tamzin seems to have the problem and upon looking at the just passed deletion discussion she forgot to mention it looks to be 5 Keep votes including Alanshohn, Eddy, Roman Spinner, Lamona and Saisykat. I see that a few were crossed out for whatever reasons but I am going off of what I am reading. You have to understand that as a working artist and individual something like a deletion tag on the first website that pops up when people "google you" is very demeaning. I am in the process of casting a film and people do research of who they are working with. To point out something else under (Wikipedia : Renominating for deletion) it also states "If you wish to renominate the page, hoping to achieve a different outcome, then slow down. You and the other participants may be overly involved with a particular perspective. Relisting immediately may come across as combative. Immediate second round participants are less likely to listen, and are more likely to dig in their heels. You may be right, but the audience won’t be receptive. The other participants very likely will be thinking that you have not been listening to them." I feel this has been handled unfairly and wished to express my concerns with you since you were the username who "kept" and then relisted." I wouldn't normall do something like this but felt I should since it's my name and livelihood. Thank you. Mario Cerrito. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarioCerrito (talk • contribs) 15:17, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I think the result would have been the same either way. If I hadn't reopened the discussion, someone would have started a new discussion. Also, some people were not struck for "whatever reason", but for misuse of this site, which was why I reopened. Geschichte (talk) 19:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and the dispute should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it or an alternate version. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:50, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:OWNERSHIP, you were really mistaken to revert the first change citing an irrelevant policy. While citing BRD in the second revert, the template was also in development, so "status quo" is hardly relevant. Changes were pending to the template since you put several articles up for PROD, but some of these were salvageable right away - and more will be once someone with access to the paywalled Metal Hammer shows up. Three reverts, now that is a block, so the situation will now cool down for 48 hours, and I will also not edit the template further during that time. Geschichte (talk) 18:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you block this user from the entire site for a content dispute on one template that you were also edit-warring on? This is a textbook case of WP:INVOLVED. Please respond at the ANI thread before someone considers escalating this. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:00, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jax 0677 (talk) 23:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harald Eidheim moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Harald Eidheim, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnar Rugstad moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gunnar Rugstad, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:39, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arb

Please note that I am filing a case with the Arbitration Committee. I'm confident you know the way there. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 00:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald Rose D

Hi Geschichte. Hope you are keeping well. I observe sometime back you deleted my article on Ronald Rose D. As cadre of Indian Administrative Service he held many important portfolios in Government of India and Government of Telangana and is of much value as Informational purpose for general public. Request you to kindly restore it or suggest the changes to move it to the main space. Thanking you in advance. Gardenkur (talk) 06:41, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geschichte. Hope you are keeping well. Posting this message as reminder to move this article to draft space so that I can make requisite changes to qualify for main space. Thanks in advance. Gardenkur (talk) 01:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration request opened

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Geschichte and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geschichte. Hope all is well. Your response to this case request would be greatly appreciated. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 06:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Randolph Lablache for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Randolph Lablache is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randolph Lablache until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 08:24, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Motions proposed at the Geschichte case request

Motions have been proposed by the arbitrators at the case request Geschichte. You can view them here and your comments are welcomed at the case request in your section. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:49, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and a case has been opened and suspended at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Geschichte. The case will remain suspended for up to three months; you may view the motion creating the case and setting the terms of the suspension here For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, GeneralNotability (talk) 00:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that per the ARBCOM motion, requested at WP:BN, your sysop flag has been removed. Please contact the arbitration committee for restoration options. — xaosflux ^Talk 01:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

The "Geschichte" request for arbitration is accepted. This case will be opened but suspended for a period of three months.^{[note 1]}

If Geschichte (talk · contribs) should return to active editing on the English Wikipedia during this time and request that this case be resumed, the Arbitration Committee shall unsuspend the case by motion and it will proceed through the normal arbitration process. Such a request may be made by email to arbcom-enwikimedia.org or at the clerks' noticeboard. Geschichte is temporarily desysopped for the duration of the case.

If such a request is not made within three months of this motion or if Geschichte resigns his administrative tools, this case shall be automatically closed, and Geschichte shall be permanently desysopped. If tools are resigned or removed, in the circumstances described above, Geschichte may regain the administrative tools at any time only via a successful request for adminship.

^ The case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Geschichte.

For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 04:57, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Geschichte

Nomination of Dimitrios Terezopoulos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dimitrios Terezopoulos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dimitrios Terezopoulos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rostand Kako for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rostand Kako is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rostand Kako until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 06:29, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File problem

Hello friend. I have a problem with a file. A.E.K. (sports club) current logo (File:AEK Athletic Club.png) it should be and in other pages of departments of AEK Athens Athletic Club, like AEK V.C., AEK Women's Volleyball Club, AEK (men's water polo) and AEK (women's water polo), which they use the same logo at their jerseys and tournaments. But, if you see the Talk Page of the file (as of 14 April 2020) they say that it should be keep it only at A.E.K. (sports club). Can we fix it and use it to all the other departments, please?

Thank you! GRanemos1 (talk) 18:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Reidar Lunde for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reidar Lunde is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reidar Lunde until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mooonswimmer 22:30, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Montserrat international footballers with 1 cap

Hello, Geschichte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Montserrat international footballers with 1 cap, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emil Nyeng is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emil Nyeng until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:21, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atle Rognerud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atle Rognerud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:26, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lena Jensen Rogn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lena Jensen Rogn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:27, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ingvild Aas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Low-level skiier that never placed on the podium or won a title, and maxed out at 19th place, so we can't presume notability based on high achievement. No WP:GNG coverage located on a search. Long since retired so new coverage is unlikely to be generated. Only source currently is a database, which isn't enough WP:SIGCOV to retain the article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:15, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simen Key Grimsrud is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simen Key Grimsrud until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:46, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft

Hello, Geschichte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Harald Eidheim, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Geschichte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gunnar Rugstad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Geschichte closed

An arbitration case regarding User:Geschichte has now closed. The Arbitration Committee resolved by motion in March to suspend the case, which could be unsuspended if Geschichte requested it within three months. Because Geschichte has not requested that the case be unsuspended, the case has been automatically closed. The motion which has now closed the case is Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Geschichte#Motion:_Open_and_suspend_case_(1)_2.

For the arbitration committee, GeneralNotability (talk) 20:56, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Geschichte closed

Football players

Why are you still creating those full-stub articles with just one sentence about football players without any sources that would confirm significant coverage to meet WP:GNG? WP:NFOOTY has been deprecated, meaning that playing one game in a fully-pro league does NOT justify the articles anymore. Snowflake91 (talk) 09:35, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

The article Svit Sešlar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced only to a database; no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:25, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chris Kouakou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced only to a database; no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Néstor Otero has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced only to a database; no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Germán González (football manager) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced only to a database; no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Aleh Awhul has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced only to a database; no evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrik Bengtsson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrik Bengtsson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 05:00, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pétur Björn Jónsson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pétur Björn Jónsson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 05:03, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Momir Mileta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Momir Mileta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 05:04, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kjartan Antonsson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kjartan Antonsson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 05:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arild Hermstad

Hi, you moved Arild Hermstad back into the mainspace, with the note "not ready" comment is not helping editors. Did you happen to look at what I said on the creator's talk page about why I had moved it, or did you just decide it was "not helping" without even bothering to look any further? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I only looked at the article's talk page. Nevertheless, the unilateral moving of "not ready" articles is, while common in practice, a backdoor around the deletion processes and is therefore not a good thing for Wikipedia. I have seen several unsubstantiated moves (in addition to the more reasonable ones), by editors whose names I have forgotten. Geschichte (talk) 12:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, that unsubstantiated moves are bad. However, when I came across this at NPP, I didn't want to take it to AfD as I thought there probably were sources available, if one searched. All the same, notability, as it stood at the time, was borderline at best, and there were also some unreferenced personal details in violation of BLP policies, so I couldn't just marked it as patrolled. All things considered, I therefore thought the best option was to draftify. I then went on the creator's talk page to explain all this, so that there was no misunderstanding.

The next thing I find is that you had effectively overruled my NPP decision, while leaving a somewhat brusque edit comment behind, to boot. NPP can be a bit of a thankless task at the best of times, and this sort of response hardly cheers one on.

But whatever; it's now in the main space, so let's leave it at that. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:54, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mario Andričević for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mario Andričević is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Andričević until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rusalkii (talk) 01:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian film reviews

If you could by any chance add Norwegian reviews to The Trip (2021 film) I would appreciate it. Thanks. -- 109.79.167.221 (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A10 deletion

Please note that I deleted Hermann Nikiéma as it was the same individual as Hermann Nikiema, which was created several months earlier and includes more information.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:04, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bjørn Ludvigsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bjørn Ludvigsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

InvadingInvader (talk) 05:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alfred Kaminski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evident notability presented; single source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 22:27, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pavel Naumov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavel Naumov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Montserrat international footballers with 1 cap

Hello, Geschichte. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Montserrat international footballers with 1 cap".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Signe J. Pedersen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Signe J. Pedersen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signe J. Pedersen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:43, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gunnar Rugstad

Hello, Geschichte. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gunnar Rugstad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:38, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liliana Zagacka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liliana Zagacka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 23:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sandro Maccini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO. No significant coverage found in WP:BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jfire (talk) 04:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lobi Manzoki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lobi Manzoki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandro Maccini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Maccini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jfire (talk) 01:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bjarte Birkeland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jguglielmin (talk) 22:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mhadjou Youssouf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mhadjou Youssouf until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:03, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Borghild Tenden has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:FC Margveti Zestafoni players has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 11:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Waltraud Dietsch has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:40, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bärbel Podeswa has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ameli Koloska has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Elfgard Schittenhelm has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Herbert Wursthorn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:05, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenan Arayıcı is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenan Arayıcı until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 02:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article José Luis Blanco has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Old article that fails Google test.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 01:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Grzegorz Borawski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Relies on online database as a source. Found no significant coverage of the subject, fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 15:56, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grzegorz Borawski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grzegorz Borawski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lars Moe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Moe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chiserc (talk) 07:56, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request to restore Ved Rahi

Hi! Since you were the admin who closed the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ved Rahi, am requesting you to restore the article at User:Dharmadhyakhsa/Ved Rahi so i can work on it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:31, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

The article Kamel Kolsi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Endorse the above

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Onezia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Onezia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 22:33, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerald Basset is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerald Basset until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 18:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jerome Dingwall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerome Dingwall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 19:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Urbain Andriamampionona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urbain Andriamampionona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 20:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Radoniaina Rabemanantsoa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radoniaina Rabemanantsoa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 20:44, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emilson Rakotonarivo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilson Rakotonarivo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 20:48, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pierralit Tovonay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierralit Tovonay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 23:56, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moussa Muryango is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moussa Muryango until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 00:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moussa Ndikumana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moussa Ndikumana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 00:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ulrik Mathisen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:04, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alfred Kaminski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Kaminski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jogurney (talk) 18:59, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NSPORTS2022 and WP:SPORTCRIT

Hello Geschichte. I hope you're doing well. I wanted to leave you a note since I can see that you are still active and creating new articles on footballers (and other subjects). Thank you for adding sources to these new articles that show WP:GNG can plausibly be met (as required by NSPORTS2022 and SPORTCRIT). I wanted to ask if you would consider going through some of the articles you've created in the past (before it was clear those articles needed the same sourcing you are adding to new articles). I can see that you've created over 20,000 articles (more than 16,000 are still stubs). Many of these have only a single reference (which is typically a statistics database entry - not enough to satisfy NSPORTS2022 and SPORTCRIT). I also created many articles (more than 1,000) before these standards were clear, and I've been checking the old ones for improvements (or deletion if they cannot be improved). I'm happy to help go through some of your creations, but it will certainly help if you can go through some as well. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 19:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It will be on my list... somewhere down the line. The articles did of course satisfy the guidelines at the time, but not necessarily anymore. When creating articles now, at a much lesser tempo, I will only publish topics that manifestly meet GNG. (I contest the notion that GNG can "plausibly" be met, as I believe GNG is explicitly met.) I am less worried about stub status, 9–10 sentences should be a pretty good start to an article. The backlog is large, though, and another peculiar situation has arisen: A number of articles were deleted for not automatically meeting the "professional league" guideline, when some cutoffs regarding that guideline was altered some years back, but they will now be eligible for reinstating since they very clearly meet GNG (once the sources are worked into the article). The work will go along pretty slowly... Geschichte (talk) 08:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. I agree that semi-pro and amateur footballers can qualify for articles if they are the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources (and in the past occasionally this happened). As you noted, there is a lot of work to be done on older articles, and I appreciate your efforts. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 13:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

The article Pedro Maia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who only made a handful of substitute's appearances during his professional football career and which comprehensively fails WP:GNG; the only available coverage is database entries.

Jogurney (talk) 13:48, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Devotchkas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Devotchkas

––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 15:08, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Philippe Felgen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find anything that indicates that this person passes WP:GNG. I was unable to come across any sources that mentions this individual in more than a passing mention.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TartarTorte 01:21, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article cteated earlier this year: Real person or hoax?

Hi, I wonder whether you might have time to check the creation of this artcle, which I find a bit dubious: [1]. The citation to NBL-1 seems dubious to me, although I do not have access to this edition. (The person is not present in the index of NBL-2, nor having an entry there, the claimed author Dahl was not born when the original nbl-1 was issued, and the new article treats events dated after the volume was issued. Other citations are also unlikely, such as one clamed book from 1889, before the subject was born). If you have access to nbl-1, maybe you can veryfy my suspicions, or eventually confirm that this person exists. In case it’s a hoax, I dont know what do with it, or the involved editor, who occasionally still edit other articles, and recent ip editor who made «corrections» to the article. Oceanh (talk) 15:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do have NBL1 in print, and will check it tomorrow. The other references are ludicrous, especially the theatre book. Furthermore, such a person is not a family member of the purported family in the 1910 census or 1920 census. I think we should nominate it for deletion first; it doesn't hurt to take the AFD route even though the result should be a foregone conclusion. Then, the closing admin can pursue the creator as they see fit. It was very sneaky, though - notice how on Halfdan Olaus' page the hoaxster inserted "second son". Geschichte (talk) 20:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for following up. I got suspicious when I saw the edits on Halfdan Olaus, checking the print version of nbl-2 (no brother mentioned there), but do not have access to nbl-1. Oceanh (talk) 21:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC).[reply]

NBL1 has only three Christophersen; incidentally all of them are brothers: Christian Eilert Rasch Christophersen, Peter Christophersen and Wilhelm Christopher Christophersen. Do you want to make the nomination, seeing as you initiated this? Geschichte (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC) (PS. NBL2 has these three Christophersens too, and we even have an article about a fourth brother. Geschichte (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for checking NBL-1, verifying what I suspected. This is also in accordance with the index in NBL-2. I am not so familiar with Afd, so in case I should nominate the article, I need some time to update myself on policies, guideline, and similar cases, which will take some time. Oceanh (talk) 18:01, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The AFD is now running. Luckily it's a pretty straightforward case with WP:V being the policy that has been violated, so no need to seek out similar cases or precedents. Geschichte (talk) 18:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Geschichte/Anagennisi Giannitsa F.C.

Hey, could you move this to Draft:Anagennisi Giannitsa F.C., or similar? I think there's enough references out there to get this to mainspace. -Bogger (talk) 21:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want to, but it currently doesn't have a single reference. Are you familiar with Greek, so you can add them? In draft space, it will be deleted six months after not being edited. Geschichte (talk) 22:08, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re-opened AfDs

I withdrew the bundled canoeists AfD and re-opened Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manaka Kubota and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teruko Kiriake, just notifying you and the other !voters in the prior AfD. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

The article Mike Solomon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find sufficient SIGCOV outside of databases

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 00:14, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Katsiaryna Shumak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of substantial notability

InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 02:47, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katsiaryna Shumak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 04:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin D. Smith is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin D. Smith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Peder Jalland moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jan Peder Jalland. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 January 14. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. RoySmith (talk) 16:12, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs

Hi. If you're interested, could you perhaps comment on or look at the other AfDs under the article alerts section on WikiProject Anthroponymy? I have been dealing with a certain user that doesn't seem too interested in following guidelines. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikolay Atanasov for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikolay Atanasov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolay Atanasov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Citizen Soldier (band)

Did you see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citizen Soldier (band) before redirecting? Because of the way it looks, it's highly likely that one will be redirected to the draft. Nobody (talk) 18:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected it because it looked like an attempt to move the draft to main space by a user who probably doesn't know about page moves. Geschichte (talk) 18:59, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you agree to restore the draft until the AfD discussion is closed? Nobody (talk) 19:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any strong opinions either way, but to me it looks like the AFD will close very soon Geschichte (talk) 20:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, the Closer will probably take care of it. No need for us to waste time on it. Nobody (talk) 20:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Eventify"

I love your creation of this word. Joyous! Noise! 16:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] The case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Geschichte.

[note 1]