User talk:TregRyder001

Welcome!

Hello, TregRyder001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Clerks 3, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 02:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clerks 3

The article Clerks 3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTFILM, not yet shooting.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 02:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Moose Jaws for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Moose Jaws is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moose Jaws until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 02:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Moose Jaws. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 03:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Moose Jaws, you may be blocked from editing. reddogsix (talk) 16:12, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Revengeance (film)

The article Revengeance (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTFILM, film is only in development and not filming.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 20:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Moonrise Kingdom. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 02:11, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Cult Status of Tusk

Please don't add your personal opinion of whether or not Tusk has achieved cult status without citing a reliable source. Continued addition of such material is the same as engaging in an edit war and from now on will be treated as such. Thank you. Rockypedia (talk) 17:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

You recently deleted this comment without explanation. Please see WP:TALKO as to why this is unacceptable behavior. Specifically, this part: Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page. Striking text constitutes a change in meaning, and should only be done by the user who wrote it or someone acting at their explicit request. Rockypedia (talk) 00:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

Hello, I'm Ebyabe. An edit that you recently made to Brad Pitt filmography seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Union of Opposites ‖ 02:00, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Brad Pitt filmography, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 02:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Robert Zemeckis

For several days, you have been edit-warring at Robert Zemeckis to reinsert a movie into the filmography though the movie has not begun principal photography. As noted in this edit summary and in this one, movies not in production do not go into a film article's filmography, per longstanding WP:FILM guidelines and consensus. You've ignored this, you haven't come onto the talk-page to discuss your edits, and even though WP:3RR has not yet been violated, an admin may block you for a pattern of edit-warring behavior. Please see the results of the formal Request for Comment on the issue, which states, "There is a clear consensus, that films, where principal photography has begun, should be included in 'Filmography' sections of articles." Please refrain from continuing to violate this consensus decision. --Tenebrae (talk) 04:16, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Red State (2011 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Diary of a Wimpy Kid (film series)  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 22:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beauty and the Beast (2017 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romantic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Plympton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revengeance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Bill Plympton / Revengeance

As you've been warned about edit-warring before, and about adding to filmographies uncited movies that have not begun filming, I will contact an admin the next time you violate [{WP:VERIFY]] and WikiProject:Film guidelines at Bill Plympton. A pattern of edit-warring behavior, as you also showed at Robert Zemeckis, can lead to an admin blocking or banning you from editing. --Tenebrae (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Miller (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Robert Zemeckis

Stop edit-warring at Robert Zemeckis. At WP:FILM, it says, "There is widespread long-standing consensus for putting films already in production into filmographies. ... Films in development or pre-production ... stay out, and it is reasonable to set the threshold of commencement of principal photography, because that is when actors begin their actual work."

This has been explained to you, yet you edit-war rather than discuss on the article talk page. Knowingly violating WP:FILM consensus to include a film at the Zemeckis filmography, a film that is not in production and may or may not ever be in production, is vandalism. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Penny's last name

Do you have a source for your edit to [Penny (The Big Bang Theory)]]? If so, why did you not cite it? —C.Fred (talk) 21:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Howard Hawks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Mann. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Warning

For the eighth time, you have inserted the same unsupported, unverified, non-footnoted claim about a movie purportedly in production. If it were in production, you could find a citation for it. Since you refuse to say where you heard this apparent rumor, keep inserting this apparent rumor, and refuse to discuss this apparent rumor, I will report you to an admin if you reinsert this ephemeral claim any more with out a reliable-source citation, and you face being blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Cars (franchise). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Carniolus (talk) 07:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at John Lasseter. Carniolus (talk) 07:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Diffs: [1][2][3][4][5][6] You have been adding a great deal of interpretive labels to a number of articles. Wikipedia is not interested in your personal views or your personal categories, or your personal interpretations of genres, or whatever. These labels must be attributed to reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking, and IMDb doesn't count, TV.com doesn't count, Wikia doesn't count, discussion forums don't count, and other user-generated content doesn't count in this regard. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent introduction of unsourced, subjective content, like genres, as you did at Xiaolin Showdown. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:13, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Hailcaesarposter.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Hailcaesarposter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 08:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Early Man (film)

The article Early Man (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TOOSOON. The film has a projected 2018 release date.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steel1943 (talk) 08:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Earlyman sts.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Earlyman sts.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 08:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Warning

At Robert Zemeckis, you're deliberately and repeatedly inserting content blatantly against WP:FILM guidelines. Do it again and I'm asking for admin intervention. You were blocked in December for edit-warring. You can be blocked for disruptive editing as well, and a second block so close to the first will be longer than the first. Take your issues to the talk page. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:48, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Doing it again

Warnings don't seem to do the trick, and you cannot say you don't know better by now. This habit of yours of adding to filmographies movies that are not yet in production has got to stop. You've already been blocked twice for this, and yet you're doing it again today at Bill Plympton, Coen brothers filmography, and Peter Bogdanovich. If you do this again, even if it's a week or a month from now, I will seek admin intervention once again to have you blocked from editing Wikipedia. And this will be for a longer time. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

You now appear to be edit-warring under IP addresses beginning 144.13. I'm already seeking protection for the Plympton page, and I will then seek a sockpuppet investigation that may have you blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your edit-warring and disruptiveness have gone on too long. --Tenebrae (talk) 19:37, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to List of Daria characters seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Pam Reynolds case ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. LuckyLouie (talk) 03:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Harry Potter without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81 ^{talk what I'm been doing} 00:33, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wes Anderson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 12:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Daria characters. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Robert Zemeckis

You've already been WP:BLOCKED twice and given numerous warnings over any number of articles for your disruptive and inappropriate editing. If you continue to make fannish, POV, non-encyclopedic WP:TONE and otherwise inappropriate edits at Robert Zemeckis, as you've shown a pattern of doing, I will take this to an ANI and seek to have you topic-blocked from editing this article, if not generally blocked as a disruptive editor. You refuse to take your issue to the talk page and in no way act as a reasonable and responsible Wikipedia contributor. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:14, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Linklater, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Realism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Diary of a Wimpy Kid

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! CatcherStorm ^talk 00:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

You've previously been blocked for persistent introduction of unsourced subjective content, so why you keep adding your opinions to articles as you've done here and here and here is beyond me, but I have to block you to prevent further damage to the encyclopedia. I don't know if you don't understand what the problem is or you do understand but don't care, but neither scenario is acceptable. All opinions need to be attributed to specific voices from reliable published sources. If you don't know how to do that, you can seek help at the Help Desk or at the Teahouse once you are unblocked. You may request an unblock by following the directions above, but you will need to demonstrate that you understand why you were blocked, and you will need to explain how you plan to edit differently going forward.

Additionally, you need to learn the difference between "it's" and "its". "It's" is a contraction of "it is". "Its" is possessive. Example: "It's a shame the dog buried its ball." Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:26, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, TregRyder001. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Boro the Caterpillar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Boro the Caterpillar. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Boro, the Caterpillar. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Boro, the Caterpillar – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Gronk Oz (talk) 13:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Warning

You've been blocked three times so far for disruptive editing, most recently for a month in October. Now you're slow-motion edit-warring again at Robert Zemeckis, adding fannish WP:PUFFERY, reverted previously, to the lead. You know very well by now that per WP:BRD, you take your issue to the talk page when reverted and try to reach consensus with other editors. You also added a completely uncited claim to Jason Priestley about the purported title to a purported "TBA" movie in knowing violation of both WP:VERIFY and of WP:FILM guidelines for filmographies. Your behavior is reaching a critical juncture and if you continue the way you've been going it will result in an WP:ANI report about having you long-term blocked or possibly banned from editing Wikipedia--Tenebrae (talk) 16:38, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:IsleOfDogsFirstLook.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:IsleOfDogsFirstLook.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 01:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Nördic Nightfury 15:59, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Isle of Dogs (film), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 17:40, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TregRyder001. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raphael Bob-Waksberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IsleOfDogsFirstLook.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IsleOfDogsFirstLook.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. Your recent edit to the page List of films considered the best appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 21:39, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 04:07, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wes Anderson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Family Guy, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. hulmem (talk) 15:08, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited How Do You Live?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Welcome to Marwen. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:47, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TregRyder001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

June 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Matt Groenig. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Jeff Smith

Hi. Please do not add redundant sections to Wikipedia articles that repeat information already given in other sections of those articles, as you did here and again here, after I reverted your first set of edits.

All of the information on Jeff Smith's early influences is already covered in detail in the Early life section. That section, in fact, deals almost entirely with that information. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:06, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bob's Burgers. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:48, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  N.J.A. | talk 10:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Thousand Miles

The article The Thousand Miles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film, tagged since 2015 for notability. No evidence that this will ever be released.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)