Catholic Mariology: Difference between revisions
Pax:Vobiscum (talk | contribs) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Catholic Mariology closed as Merge |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{About|[[Roman Catholic (term)|Roman Catholic]] perspectives, and does not reflect the views of other segments of the [[Catholic Church]] such as [[Eastern Catholics]]|general Christian views|Mariology}} |
{{About|[[Roman Catholic (term)|Roman Catholic]] perspectives, and does not reflect the views of other segments of the [[Catholic Church]] such as [[Eastern Catholics]]|general Christian views|Mariology}} |
||
{{Roman Catholic Mariology (long format)}} |
{{Roman Catholic Mariology (long format)}} |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The ongoing development of Mariology continued in the 20th century, e.g. in his [[Angelus]] address in September 1985 Pope [[John Paul II]] coined the term ''The [[Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary]]'', and in 1986 addressed the international conference on that topic held at [[Fátima, Portugal]].<ref name="vatican.va">[http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/1986/september/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19860922_simposio-maria-gesu_en.html Pope John Paul II 1986 Speech at the Vatican Website]</ref><ref name="christendom-awake.org">Arthur Calkins, ''The Alliance of the Two Hearts and Consecration'', [[Miles Immaculatae]] XXXI (July/December 1995) 389-407. [http://www.christendom-awake.org/pages/calkins/2hearts&consec.htm]</ref><ref name="Mary 1986">''Proceedings of the International Theological Symposium on the Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary'', September 1986, Fátima, Portugal</ref> |
The ongoing development of Mariology continued in the 20th century, e.g. in his [[Angelus]] address in September 1985 Pope [[John Paul II]] coined the term ''The [[Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary]]'', and in 1986 addressed the international conference on that topic held at [[Fátima, Portugal]].<ref name="vatican.va">[http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/speeches/1986/september/documents/hf_jp-ii_spe_19860922_simposio-maria-gesu_en.html Pope John Paul II 1986 Speech at the Vatican Website]</ref><ref name="christendom-awake.org">Arthur Calkins, ''The Alliance of the Two Hearts and Consecration'', [[Miles Immaculatae]] XXXI (July/December 1995) 389-407. [http://www.christendom-awake.org/pages/calkins/2hearts&consec.htm]</ref><ref name="Mary 1986">''Proceedings of the International Theological Symposium on the Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary'', September 1986, Fátima, Portugal</ref> |
||
== |
==Mariology and Christology== |
||
In Roman Catholicism, Mariology is a logical and necessary consequence of [[Christology]]: Jesus and Mary are son and mother, redeemer and redeemed.<ref>At the center of this mystery, in the midst of this wonderment of faith, stands Mary. As the loving Mother of the Redeemer, she was the first to experience it: "To the wonderment of nature you bore your Creator"! Pope John Paul II, in ''Redemptoris Mater'', 51</ref> Mariology is Christology developed to its full potential.<ref>See Pius XII ''Mystici corporis Christi''; John Henry Newman: ''Mariology is always christocentric'', in Michael Testa, Mary: ''The Virgin Mary in the Life and Writings of John Henry Newman 2001''; "Mariology Is Christology", in Vittorio Messori, ''The Mary Hypothesis'', Rome: 2005</ref> In Catholic theology, Mary and her son Jesus are very close but not identical. Therefore, Marian teaching, while contributing to the teaching of Christ, is also a separate discipline, called Mariology. The figure of Mary contributes to a fuller understanding of who Christ is and what he did. In the Roman Catholic view, a Christology without Mary is incomplete because it is not based on the total revelation of the Bible.<ref>Paul Haffner, 2004 ''The mystery of Mary'' Gracewing Press ISBN 0852446500 page 17</ref> |
|||
===Mariology and Christology=== |
|||
In Roman Catholicism, Mariology is a logical and necessary consequence of [[Christology]]: Jesus and Mary are son and mother, redeemer and redeemed.<ref>At the center of this mystery, in the midst of this wonderment of faith, stands Mary. As the loving Mother of the Redeemer, she was the first to experience it: "To the wonderment of nature you bore your Creator"! Pope John Paul II, in ''Redemptoris Mater'', 51</ref> Mariology is Christology developed to its full potential.<ref>See Pius XII ''Mystici corporis Christi''; John Henry Newman: ''Mariology is always christocentric'', in Michael Testa, Mary: ''The Virgin Mary in the Life and Writings of John Henry Newman 2001''; "Mariology Is Christology", in Vittorio Messori, ''The Mary Hypothesis'', Rome: 2005</ref> In Catholic theology, Mary and her son Jesus are very close but not identical. Therefore, Marian teaching, while contributing to the teaching of Christ, is also a separate discipline, called Mariology. The figure of Mary contributes to a fuller understanding of who Christ is and what he did. In the Roman Catholic view, a Christology without Mary is incomplete because it is not based on the total revelation of the Bible.<ref>Paul Haffner, 2004 ''The mystery of Mary'' Gracewing Press ISBN 0852446500 page 17</ref> |
|||
[[Image:Istanbul - S. Salvatore in Chora - Nartece - Cristo e Maria - Foto G. Dall'Orto 26-5-2006.jpg|thumb|left|200px|Christ and Mary, mosaic, [[Chora Church]], 16th century. "''To Christ through Mary''", taught by St. [[Louis de Montfort]], is a key theme in [[RCTerm|Roman Catholic]] Mariology.<ref>Jenny Schroede, 2006 ''The Everything Mary Book'' ISBN 1593377134 page 219</ref>]] |
[[Image:Istanbul - S. Salvatore in Chora - Nartece - Cristo e Maria - Foto G. Dall'Orto 26-5-2006.jpg|thumb|left|200px|Christ and Mary, mosaic, [[Chora Church]], 16th century. "''To Christ through Mary''", taught by St. [[Louis de Montfort]], is a key theme in [[RCTerm|Roman Catholic]] Mariology.<ref>Jenny Schroede, 2006 ''The Everything Mary Book'' ISBN 1593377134 page 219</ref>]] |
||
Early Christians and numerous saints focused on this parallel interpretation. Popes highlighted the inner link between Marian dogmas and the full acceptance of christological dogma.<ref>''Mystici Corporis, Lumen Gentium and Redemptoris Mater'' provide a modern Catholic understanding of this link.</ref> The Church is the people of God as she is the Body of Christ.<ref>see Pius XII, ''Mystici corporis'', also John Paul II in ''Redemptoris Mater'': The Second Vatican Council, by presenting Mary in the mystery of Christ, also finds the path to a deeper understanding of the mystery of the Church. Mary, as the Mother of Christ, is in a particular way united with the Church, "which the Lord established as his own body."11 It is significant that the conciliar text places this truth about the Church as the Body of Christ (according to the teaching of the Pauline Letters) in close proximity to the truth that the Son of God "through the power of the Holy Spirit was born of the Virgin Mary." The reality of the Incarnation finds an extension in the mystery of the Church-the Body of Christ. And one cannot think of the reality of the Incarnation without referring to Mary, the Mother of the Incarnate Word. ''Redemptoris Mater'' 44</ref> The Church lives in its relation to Christ. Being the Body of Christ, the Church has also a relation to his mother, which is the subject of Catholic Mariology. She is seen as the original image of the Church, or, as [[Vatican II]] states, [[Mother of the Church]].<ref>"If we look at the Church, we have to have to consider the miraculous deeds which God performed with his mother." (Paul VI, Vatican II, November 21, 1964)</ref> |
Early Christians and numerous saints focused on this parallel interpretation. Popes highlighted the inner link between Marian dogmas and the full acceptance of christological dogma.<ref>''Mystici Corporis, Lumen Gentium and Redemptoris Mater'' provide a modern Catholic understanding of this link.</ref> The Church is the people of God as she is the Body of Christ.<ref>see Pius XII, ''Mystici corporis'', also John Paul II in ''Redemptoris Mater'': The Second Vatican Council, by presenting Mary in the mystery of Christ, also finds the path to a deeper understanding of the mystery of the Church. Mary, as the Mother of Christ, is in a particular way united with the Church, "which the Lord established as his own body."11 It is significant that the conciliar text places this truth about the Church as the Body of Christ (according to the teaching of the Pauline Letters) in close proximity to the truth that the Son of God "through the power of the Holy Spirit was born of the Virgin Mary." The reality of the Incarnation finds an extension in the mystery of the Church-the Body of Christ. And one cannot think of the reality of the Incarnation without referring to Mary, the Mother of the Incarnate Word. ''Redemptoris Mater'' 44</ref> The Church lives in its relation to Christ. Being the Body of Christ, the Church has also a relation to his mother, which is the subject of Catholic Mariology. She is seen as the original image of the Church, or, as [[Vatican II]] states, [[Mother of the Church]].<ref>"If we look at the Church, we have to have to consider the miraculous deeds which God performed with his mother." (Paul VI, Vatican II, November 21, 1964)</ref> |
||
In his 1946 publication ''Compendium Mariologiae'', respected [[Mariology(RC)|Mariologist]] [[Gabriel Roschini]] explained that Mary did not only participate in the birth of the [[physical]] Jesus but also, with conception, she entered with him into a [[Spirituality|spiritual]] union. The divine salvation plan, being not only material, includes a permanent spiritual unity with Christ. Most Mariologists agree with this position.<ref>Schmaus, ''Mariologie'', München: 1955, 328</ref> This echoed the sentiments of [[Pope Saint Pius X]] who in ''[[Ad Diem Illum]]'' stated: "''there is no more direct road than by Mary for uniting all mankind in Christ''."<ref>[[Pope Saint Pius X]], in [[Ad Diem Illum]], section 5, 1904</ref> |
In his 1946 publication ''Compendium Mariologiae'', respected [[Mariology(RC)|Mariologist]] [[Gabriel Roschini]] explained that Mary did not only participate in the birth of the [[physical]] Jesus but also, with conception, she entered with him into a [[Spirituality|spiritual]] union. The divine salvation plan, being not only material, includes a permanent spiritual unity with Christ. Most Mariologists agree with this position.<ref>Schmaus, ''Mariologie'', München: 1955, 328</ref> This echoed the sentiments of [[Pope Saint Pius X]] who in ''[[Ad Diem Illum]]'' stated: "''there is no more direct road than by Mary for uniting all mankind in Christ''."<ref>[[Pope Saint Pius X]], in [[Ad Diem Illum]], section 5, 1904</ref> |
||
Mariology is ongoing. It includes dogmas, traditions, confirmed and hypothetical theological positions on Mary, contemporary as well as historical. Mariology is not simply a theological field studied by a few scholars, but a devotional concept embraced by millions of Catholics who venerate the [[BVM(RC)|Blessed Virgin Mary]]. As discussed below, it differs from other parts of theology in that its progress has quite often been driven from ''the ground up'', from the masses of believers, and at times from religious experiences of young and simple children on remote hilltops, which have then influenced the higher levels of the [[Holy See]] in Rome via ''[[sensus fidei]]''. |
Mariology is ongoing. It includes dogmas, traditions, confirmed and hypothetical theological positions on Mary, contemporary as well as historical. Mariology is not simply a theological field studied by a few scholars, but a devotional concept embraced by millions of Catholics who venerate the [[BVM(RC)|Blessed Virgin Mary]]. As discussed below, it differs from other parts of theology in that its progress has quite often been driven from ''the ground up'', from the masses of believers, and at times from religious experiences of young and simple children on remote hilltops, which have then influenced the higher levels of the [[Holy See]] in Rome via ''[[sensus fidei]]''. |
||
Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
[[Marian doctrines of the Catholic Church]], including the four dogmas mentioned below, are the central part of Mariology consisting of confirmed teachings and doctrines regarding Mary's life and role, but excluding the overall perspectives, the controversies and the cultural aspects of Marian devotion. Mariology is both part of abstract doctrine and an important part of church life: Marian prayers, pilgrimages to Marian shrines, Marian devotions during the months of May and October, Marian apparitions, Marian titles, and Marian Feast days are detailed in [[Blessed Virgin Mary (Roman Catholic)|Blessed Virgin Mary]]. Therefore, this article on Roman Catholic Mariology presents an overview of the major issues, developments and controversies of the [[Ecclesiology|ecclesiogical]] movement. |
[[Marian doctrines of the Catholic Church]], including the four dogmas mentioned below, are the central part of Mariology consisting of confirmed teachings and doctrines regarding Mary's life and role, but excluding the overall perspectives, the controversies and the cultural aspects of Marian devotion. Mariology is both part of abstract doctrine and an important part of church life: Marian prayers, pilgrimages to Marian shrines, Marian devotions during the months of May and October, Marian apparitions, Marian titles, and Marian Feast days are detailed in [[Blessed Virgin Mary (Roman Catholic)|Blessed Virgin Mary]]. Therefore, this article on Roman Catholic Mariology presents an overview of the major issues, developments and controversies of the [[Ecclesiology|ecclesiogical]] movement. |
||
== |
==History and development == |
||
{{Main|History of Roman Catholic Mariology}} |
|||
[[Image:Rome SantaMariaAntiqua01.jpg|thumb|120px|left|[[Santa Maria Antiqua]], in the [[Forum Romanum]], 5th century, seat of [[Pope John VII]].]] |
|||
The history of Mariology goes back to the first century. Early Christians focused their piety at first more upon the martyrs around them. Following that, they saw in Mary a bridge between the old and the new.<ref>Schmaus, ''Mariologie'', page 174</ref> The earliest recorded prayer to Mary, the ''[[sub tuum praesidium]]'', is dated in its earliest form to around the year 250. |
|||
In the fifth century, the [[Third Ecumenical Council]] declared Mary as ''[[Theotokos]]'' (God-bearer). Churches dedicated to Mary were constructed across the Christian world, among the most famous being [[Santa Maria Maggiore]] in Rome. Teaching of the [[Assumption of Mary]] became widespread across the Christian world. The Middle Ages saw growth and development for Mariology and brought major champions of Marian devotion to the fore, including [[Ephraim the Syrian]], [[John Damascene]] and [[Bernard of Clairvaux]]. Prayers to Mary included the ''[[Ave Maria]]'', and chants such as ''[[Ave Maris Stella]]'' and the ''[[Salve Regina]]'' emerged and became staples of monastic plainsong. Devotional practices grew in number. |
|||
The [[Renaissance]] period witnessed a dramatic growth in [[Roman Catholic Marian art|Marian art]] and masterpieces by [[Boticelli]], [[Leonardo da Vinci]] and [[Raphael]] were produced. In the 16th century, the [[Council of Trent]] confirmed the Catholic tradition of paintings and artworks in churches. This resulted in a great development of Marian art and Mariology during the [[Baroque Period]]. During the [[Protestant Reformation|Reformation]], the Catholic Church defended its Mariology against [[Protestant]] views. With the victory at [[Battle of Lepanto (1571)]] accredited to her, it "signified the beginning of a strong resurgence of Marian devotions."<ref>Otto Stegmüller, Barock, in ''Marienkunde'', 1967 566</ref> The baroque literature on Mary experienced unforeseen growth. More than 500 pages of Mariological writings were published during the 17th century alone.<ref>A Roskovany, ''conceptu immacolata ex monumentis omnium seculrorum demonstrate III'', Budapest: 1873</ref> |
|||
Mariology in the 19th century was dominated by discussions about the [[Immaculate Conception]] and in 1854, [[Pope Pius IX]] proclaimed it a dogma.<ref>[http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/alpha/data/aud19930324en.html Vatican website]</ref> Mariology in the 20th century was dominated by a genuine Marian enthusiasm. [[Pope Pius XII]] issued the [[Dogma of the Assumption]] and the [[Second Vatican Council]] declared Mary to be the ''Mother of the Church''.<ref name="Bäumer 534">Bäumer 534</ref> |
|||
==Views of the saints== |
|||
{{Main|Mariology of the saints}} |
|||
[[Image:Duccio.The-Madonna-and-Child-with-Saints-149.jpg|thumb|240px|''[[Madonna and Child with saints polyptych (Duccio)|Madonna and saints]]'' by [[Duccio]], 14th century.]] |
|||
Roman Catholic Mariology has relied on the writings of numerous saints throughout history who have attested to the central role of Mary in God's plan of salvation. |
|||
Saint [[Irenaeus of Lyons]] (circa 140-202) was perhaps the earliest of the Church Fathers to develop a thorough Mariology and he set out a forthright account of Mary's role in the "[[economy of salvation]]".<ref>Irenaeus of Lyons, ''Adversus haereses'' 3:22</ref><ref>Irenaeus, Book V, 19,3</ref> This view influenced [[Ambrose of Milan]] whose powerful Mariology influenced contemporary Popes such as [[Pope Damasus]] and [[Siricius]] and later, [[Pope Leo the Great]]. His student [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] and the [[First Council of Ephesus|Council of Ephesus]] were equally under his influence.<ref>Ambrose of Milan, ''CSEL'' 64, 139</ref><ref>Ambrose of Milan, ''De Mysteriis'', 59, PG 16, 410</ref><ref>[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf210.iv.ii.iv.xi.html Ambrose of Milan, ''De Spiritu Sancto'', III, 11,79-80]</ref> Augustine argued that because of a woman, the whole human race was saved.<ref>"Per feminam mors, per feminam vita", ''De Sacra Virginitate'',289</ref> |
|||
In his encyclical ''[[Doctor Mellifluus]]'' on Saint [[Bernhard of Clairvaux]], [[Pope Pius XII]] quoted three central elements of Berhard's Mariology: How he explained the [[virginity]] of Mary, the "[[Our Lady, Star of the Sea|Star of the Sea]]"; how the faithful should pray on the Virgin Mary; and, how Bernhard relied on the Virgin Mary as ''[[mediatrix]]''. |
|||
[[Saint Alphonsus Liguori]] (1696–1787), a Doctor of the Church, was an effective defender of Mariology against the ideas of [[Jansenism]]. He wrote ''[[The Glories of Mary]]'' to present a basis for Mariology, derived from Scripture and the works of the [[Church Fathers]]. He greatly influenced Catholic Mariology during the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] period. His Marian enthusiasm contrasted with what some believers considered the colder [[rationalism]] of the Enlightenment. Mainly pastoral in nature, his Mariology rediscovered, integrated and defended the Mariology of Augustine, Ambrose and other fathers. It represented an intellectual defence of Mariology in the eighteenth century.<ref>P Hitz, Alfons v. Liguori, in ''Marienkunde'', 1967 130</ref> |
|||
[[Saint Louis de Montfort]]'s highly influential ''[[True Devotion to Mary]]'' synthesized many of the earlier saints' writings and teachings on Mary. De Montfort's approach of "total consecration to Jesus Christ through Mary" had a strong impact on Marian devotion both in popular piety and in the spirituality of [[religious order]]s. One of his well-known followers was Pope [[John Paul II]] of the 20th century. According to his Apostolic Letter ''[[Rosarium Virginis Mariae]]'', the pontiff's personal motto ''[[Totus Tuus]]'' (Totally yours) was inspired by St. Louis' doctrine on the excellence of Marian devotion and total consecration. |
|||
==Dogmatic teachings== |
|||
{{Main|Roman Catholic dogma}} |
{{Main|Roman Catholic dogma}} |
||
Marian [[Roman Catholic dogma]]s have two functions: they present infallible Church teachings about Mary and her relation to Jesus Christ, and they praise Mary and, through Mary, God's deed on Mary. All Marian dogmas teach about her divine son and highlight the divine nature of Jesus Christ. |
Marian [[Roman Catholic dogma]]s have two functions: they present infallible Church teachings about Mary and her relation to Jesus Christ, and they praise Mary and, through Mary, God's deed on Mary. All Marian dogmas teach about her divine son and highlight the divine nature of Jesus Christ. |
||
'''De Fide Definita or De Fide Credenda''' doctrines have the highest degree of dogmatic certainty. These doctrines come in several forms, namely teachings which have been specifically defined as Revealed by an extraordinary definition by a Pope or Ecumenical council, or those teachings infallibly taught to be Revealed by the ordinary universal Magisterium. As in the case of the [[Immaculate Conception]] or the [[Assumption of Mary|Assumption]], these doctrines were held by the Church prior to the date of official definition, but open for discussion. The date of definition must be accepted by all faithful members of the Catholic Church as contained specifically in the Deposit of Faith and owed supernatural faith in itself (de fide credenda) |
|||
There are four Marian dogmas among a large number of other teachings about the [[Blessed Virgin Mary (Roman Catholic)|Blessed Virgin]]:<ref>Mark Miravalle, 1993, ''Introduction to Mary'', Queenship Publishing ISBN 9781882972067 page 51</ref> |
There are four Marian dogmas among a large number of other teachings about the [[Blessed Virgin Mary (Roman Catholic)|Blessed Virgin]]:<ref>Mark Miravalle, 1993, ''Introduction to Mary'', Queenship Publishing ISBN 9781882972067 page 51</ref> |
||
Line 33: | Line 60: | ||
!| Dogma content |
!| Dogma content |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[Perpetual virginity]] ||Baptismal symbols since Third Century || 'Perpetual virginity of Mary', means that Mary was a virgin before, during and after giving birth |
| [[Perpetual virginity]] ||Baptismal symbols since Third Century || 'Perpetual virginity of Mary', means that Mary was a virgin before, during and after giving birth |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[Mother of God]] || [[First Council of Ephesus|Council of Ephesus]] (431) || Mary is truly the mother of God, because of her unity with Christ, the Son of God |
| [[Mother of God]] || [[First Council of Ephesus|Council of Ephesus]] (431) || Mary is truly the mother of God, because of her unity with Christ, the Son of God |
||
|- |
|- |
||
|[[Immaculate Conception]] ||[[Pope Pius IX]] (1854) || Mary, at her conception, was preserved immaculate from [[Original Sin]] |
|[[Immaculate Conception]] ||[[Pope Pius IX]] (1854) || Mary, at her conception, was preserved immaculate from [[Original Sin]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[Assumption of Mary|Assumption into heaven]] || [[Pope Pius XII]] (1950) || Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory |
| [[Assumption of Mary|Assumption into heaven]] || [[Pope Pius XII]] (1950) || Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory |
||
Line 44: | Line 71: | ||
For a discussion of a proposed fifth Marian dogma, see the section on [[#Mediatrix and Co-Redemptrix|Mediatrix and Co-Redemptrix]] below. |
For a discussion of a proposed fifth Marian dogma, see the section on [[#Mediatrix and Co-Redemptrix|Mediatrix and Co-Redemptrix]] below. |
||
===Perpetual virginity of Mary=== |
|||
==History and development == |
|||
{{ |
{{main| Perpetual virginity of Mary ||Mariology | Virgin birth of Jesus }} |
||
''''''Perpetual virginity of Mary''', means that Mary was a virgin before, during and after giving birth. (De fide)''' This oldest Marian [[Roman Catholicism|Roman Catholic]], [[Eastern Orthodox Church|Eastern Orthodox]], and [[Oriental Orthodox]] doctrine affirms [[Mary (mother of Jesus)|Mary's]] "real and perpetual [[virginity]] even in the act of giving birth to the Son of God made Man."<ref>''Catechism of the Catholic Church'' §499</ref> Thus, by the teaching of this [[dogma]], the faithful believe that Mary was ever-Virgin (Greek ''{{polytonic| ???????????}}'') for the remainder of her life, making Jesus her only biological son, whose [[Incarnation (Christianity)|conception]] and [[Nativity of Jesus|birth]] are miraculous. |
|||
In the year 107, [[Ignatius of Antioch]] described the virginity of Mary as "hidden from the prince of this world ... loudly proclaimed, but wrought in the silence of God."The affirmation of the doctrine of Mary's virginity before, during and after the birth of Jesus was the principal aim of the early second century work, the [[Gospel of James|''Protoevangelium'']] of James (''c''. 120-150). The work, concerned with the character and purity of Mary, claims that Joseph had children from a marriage previous to Mary. However, the text does not explicitly assert the doctrine of perpetual virginity. The earliest such surviving reference is Origen's ''Commentary on Matthew'', where he cites the ''Protoevangelium'' in support. |
|||
===Early church=== |
|||
[[Image:Rome SantaMariaAntiqua01.jpg|thumb|120px|[[Santa Maria Antiqua]], in the [[Forum Romanum]], 5th century, seat of [[Pope John VII]].]] |
|||
The history of Mariology goes back to the first century. Early Christians focused their piety at first more upon the martyrs around them. Following that, they saw in Mary a bridge between the old and the new.<ref>Schmaus, ''Mariologie'', 174</ref> In the second century, St. [[Irenaeus]] of Lyons called Mary the "second Eve", because through Mary and her willing acceptance of God's choice, God undid the harm that was done through Eve's choice to eat the forbidden fruit. The earliest recorded prayer to Mary, the ''[[sub tuum praesidium]]'', is dated in its earliest form to around the year 250. |
|||
By the fourth century, the doctrine was generally accepted. [[Athanasius]] described Mary as "Ever-Virgin", ''Orations against the Arians'', as did [[Epiphanius of Salamis|Epiphanius]] in his ''Medicine Chest Against All Heresies''. [[Hilary of Poitiers|Hilary]] argued in favor of the doctrine in his ''Commentary on Matthew'' and to this may be added [[Didymus the Blind|Didymus]] (''The Trinity'') [[Ambrose]] of Milan, [[Jerome]], in ''Against Helvetius'', [[Pope Siricius|Siricius]]' and others. |
|||
In the fifth century, the [[Third Ecumenical Council]] debated the question of whether Mary should be referred to as ''[[Theotokos]]'' (God-bearer) and ultimately affirmed the use of the term. Churches dedicated to Mary were constructed across the Christian world, among the most famous being [[Santa Maria Maggiore]] in Rome. Teaching of the [[Assumption of Mary]] became widespread across the Christian world from the sixth century onward; the memorial day of the festival was established on the 15th of August in both the East and the West traditions. |
|||
Further important statements of the belief include the Lateran Synod of 649, [[Thomas Aquinas|Thomas Aquinas's]] teaching (''Summa Theologiae'' III.28.2) that Mary gave birth painlessly in miraculous fashion without opening of the womb and without injury to the [[hymen]], and [[Pope Paul IV]]'s ''Cum quorundam'' of 7 August 1555 at the [[Council of Trent]]. Before this last extraordinary papal/concilliar definition, really an afterthought, the teaching can be considered to have been always taught infallibly by the ordinary and universal magisterium as a truth contained in the deposit of faith, as opposed to by any specific extraordinary definition. |
|||
===Middle Ages to the Reformation=== |
|||
The Middle Ages saw growth and development for Mariology and brought major champions of Marian devotion to the fore, including [[Ephraim the Syrian]], [[John Damascene]] and [[Bernard of Clairvaux]]. Prayers to Mary included the ''[[Ave Maria]]'', and chants such as ''[[Ave Maris Stella]]'' and the ''[[Salve Regina]]'' emerged and became staples of monastic plainsong. Devotional practices grew in number. From the year 1000 onward, more and more churches, including many of Europe's greatest cathedrals, were dedicated to Mary. |
|||
'''Virginity before birth'''<br> |
|||
One major controversy of the age was the [[Immaculate Conception]]. Although the sinlessness of Mary had been discussed since the early church, the exact time and means whereby Mary became sinless became a matter for debate and dispute.<ref name=KRahner>''Encyclopedia of theology: a concise Sacramentum mundi'' by Karl Rahner 2004 ISBN 0860120066 pages 896-898</ref> Gradually, the idea that Mary had been cleansed of [[original sin]] at the very moment of her conception began to predominate, particularly after [[Duns Scotus]] dealt with the major objection to Mary's sinlessness from conception, that being her need for redemption.<ref name=KRahner /><ref>Ludwig Ott, ''Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma'', Cork, Ireland: Mercier Press Ltd., 1955</ref> The very divine act, in making Mary sinless at the first instant of her conception was, he argued, the most perfect form of redemption possible. |
|||
'''Mary conceived by the [[Holy Spirit]] without participation of any man. (De fide).''' Non-Christians questioned this belief of the early Church <ref>Celsus, Julian apostate, Cerinth and the Ebonites</ref> Jews and Christians differed on the prediction in Isaiah 7,14 <ref>which Christians believe is messianic, pointing to Mary’s role in the history of salvation</ref> Along with other Christian groups the Catholic Church continues to teach today, that Mary bore her son Jesus while still a virgin. ''From the first formulations of her faith, the Church has confessed that Jesus was conceived solely by the power of the Holy Spirit in the womb of the Virgin Mary, affirming also the corporeal aspect of this event: Jesus was conceived "by the Holy Spirit without human seed".<ref>Para? 146</ref> The Fathers see in the virginal conception the sign that it truly was the Son of God who came in a humanity like our own.'' [[Catechism of the Catholic Church]],<ref>Para 496.</ref><ref>This is a teaching taught infallibly as de fide credenda by the ordinary and universal magisterium of the Church.</ref> |
|||
'''Virginity during birth'''<br> |
|||
[[Image:Kathedrale Siena Fassade.jpg|thumb|left|[[Santa Maria Assunta, Siena]], 1215.]] |
|||
'''Mary gave birth without losing her corporal virginity (De fide).''' Her corporal integrity was not affected by giving birth. The Church does not teach how this occurred physically, but insists that virginity during child birth is different from virginity of conception. [[Pope Pius XII]] in ''[[Mystici Corporis]]'' "Within her virginal womb she brought into life Christ our Lord in a marvellous birth." <ref>morando partu edidit Encyclical Mystici Corporis 110</ref> indicating the miraculous nature of the Virgin birth. Numerous early Church writers used analogies to explain this mystery, like Christ leaving the sealed tomb on Easter Sunday, or, Christ walking through closed doors, or, light and sun penetrating through glass windows.<ref>Hieronymus, Epistulae 49, 21, Iriniaeus Epid 54, Ignatius of Antioch, Eph, 19,1, Clement of Alexandria, Srom VII, 16,93,Origin, Lev hom 8,2 Ambrose of Milan epistulae, 49,22 Augustine, Enchidrion, 34</ref> |
|||
The [[Romanesque architecture|Romanesque]] period saw the construction of major [[Roman Catholic Marian churches|Marian churches]], such as [[Speyer Cathedral]] (also known as the [[Mariendom]]) in [[Speyer, Germany]] and [[Our Lady of Flanders]] Cathedral in [[Tournai, Belgium]]. |
|||
'''Virginity after birth''' |
|||
Gothic cathedrals, such as [[Notre Dame de Paris]] as well as [[Our Lady of Chartres]] near Paris, were major masterworks of the time. Construction of [[Santa Maria Assunta, Siena|Santa Maria Assunta]] Cathedral in [[Siena, Italy]] and [[Notre-Dame Cathedral, Luxembourg]] increased the number of [[Roman Catholic Marian churches|churches devoted to the Virgin Mary]]. |
|||
'''Mary remained a virgin after giving birth (De fide).''' This belief of the Church was questioned in its early years <ref>Tertullian, Eunomius, Helvisius, Bonosus of Sardica Ott, 249</ref> Today most Protestants disagree with this teaching, although Martin Luther and his contemporaries believed in the ever Virgin Mary <ref>ex maria pura sancta simper virgine, Articuli smalcaldi I,4</ref> The scriptures say little about this, mentioning the brothers of Jesus, but never "sons of Mary," suggesting to the patristical writers a broader family relationship.<ref>J D Aldama, La vergenidad in partu en la exegesis patristica, Salamanca, 1962, 113</ref> |
|||
The [[Renaissance]] period witnessed a dramatic growth in [[Roman Catholic Marian art|Marian art]]. In this period, significant works of Marian art by masters such as [[Boticelli]], [[Leonardo da Vinci]] and [[Raphael]] were produced. Some Marian art was specifically produced to decorate the Marian churches built in this period. |
|||
===Mother of God=== |
|||
During the [[Protestant Reformation]], Roman Catholic Mariology was under unprecedented attack as being sacrilegious and superstitious. Protestant leaders like [[Martin Luther]] and [[John Calvin]], while personally adhering to Marian beliefs like [[virgin birth of Jesus|virgin birth]] and sinlessness, considered [[BVM(RC)|Catholic veneration of Mary]] as competition to the divine role of Jesus Christ. |
|||
{{main| Theotokos| First Council of Ephesus }} |
|||
[[File:Encaustic Virgin.jpg|thumb|180px|[[Madonna and Child]] from [[Saint Catherine's Monastery]], c. 600]] |
|||
'''Mary is truly the mother of God (De fide).''' After Church fathers found common ground on Mary's virginity before, during and after giving birth, this was the first specifically Marian doctrine to be formally defined by the Church. The definition ''Mother of God'' (in Greek:[[Theotokos]],) was formally affirmed at the [[Third Ecumenical Council]] held at [[Ephesus]] in [[431]]. The competing view, advocated by [[Patriarch of Constantinople|Patriarch]] [[Nestorius]] of Constantinople, was that Mary should be called ''Christotokos'', meaning "Birth-giver of Christ," to restrict her role to the mother of Christ's humanity only and not his divine nature. |
|||
Nestorius' opponents, led by [[Cyril of Alexandria]], viewed this as dividing Jesus into two distinct persons, the human who was Son of Mary, and the divine who was not. To them, this was unacceptable since by destroying the perfect union of the divine and human natures in Christ, it sabotaged the fullness of the Incarnation and, by extension, the salvation of humanity. The council accepted Cyril's reasoning, affirmed the title ''Theotokos'' for Mary, and [[anathema]]tised Nestorius' view as [[heresy]]. (See [[Nestorianism]]) |
|||
As a reflection of this theological opposition, Protestant reformers destroyed much religious art and Marian statues and paintings in churches in northern Europe and England.<!-- This section is linked from [[Cathedral of Saint Martin, Utrecht]] --> Some of the [[Protestantism|Protestant]] reformers, in particular [[Andreas Karlstadt]], [[Huldrych Zwingli]] and [[John Calvin]], encouraged the removal of religious images by invoking the [[Ten Commandments|Decalogue's]] prohibition of idolatry and the manufacture of graven images of God. Major iconoclastic riots took place in [[Zürich]] (in 1523), [[Copenhagen]] (1530), [[Münster]] (1534), [[Geneva]] (1535), [[Augsburg]] (1537), and [[Scotland]] (1559). Protestant inconoclasm swept through the [[Seventeen Provinces]] (now the Netherlands and Belgium and parts of Northern France) in the summer of 1566. |
|||
In letters to Nestorius which were afterwards included among the council documents, Cyril explained his doctrine. He noted that "the holy fathers... have ventured to call the holy Virgin ''[T]heotokos'', not as though the nature of the [W]ord or his divinity received the beginning of their existence from the holy Virgin, but because from her was born his holy body, rationally endowed with a soul, with which [body] the [W]ord was united according to the [[hypostasis (religion)|hypostasis]], and is said to have been begotten according to the flesh" (Cyril's second letter to Nestorius). |
|||
The [[Council of Trent]] confirmed the Catholic tradition of paintings and artworks in churches. This resulted in a great development of Marian art and Mariology during the [[Baroque Period]]. |
|||
Explaining his rejection of Nestorius' preferred title for Mary (''Christotokos'', Mother of Christ,) Cyril wrote: "Confessing the Word to be united with the flesh according to the hypostasis, we worship one Son and Lord, Jesus Christ. We do not divide him into parts and separate man and God as though they were united with each other [only] through a unity of dignity and authority... nor do we name separately Christ the Word from God, and in similar fashion, separately, another Christ from the woman, but we know only one Christ, the Word from God the Father with his own flesh... But we do not say that the Word from God dwelt as in an ordinary human born of the holy virgin... we understand that, when he became flesh, not in the same way as he is said to dwell among the saints do we distinguish the manner of the indwelling; but he was united by nature and not turned into flesh... There is, then, one Christ and Son and Lord, not with the sort of conjunction that a human being might have with God as in a unity of dignity or authority; for equality of honor does not unite natures. For Peter and John were equal to each other in honor, both of them being apostles and holy disciples, but the two were not one. Nor do we understand the manner of conjunction to be one of juxtaposition, for this is insufficient in regard to natural union.... Rather we reject the term 'conjunction' as being inadequate to express the union... [T]he holy virgin gave birth in the flesh to God united with the flesh according to hypostasis, for that reason we call her ''Theotokos''... If anyone does not confess that Emmanuel is, in truth, God, and therefore that the holy virgin is ''Theotokos'' (for she bore in a fleshly manner the Word from God become flesh), let him be [[anathema]]." (Cyril's third letter to Nestorius) |
|||
===Baroque to the Enlightenment=== |
|||
[[Image:The Battle of Lepanto by Paolo Veronese.jpeg|thumb|200px|The ''[[Battle of Lepanto (Veronese)|Battle of Lepanto]]'' by [[Paolo Veronese]]. Oil on canvas]] |
|||
During the [[Protestant Reformation|Reformation]], the Catholic Church defended its Mariology against [[Protestant]] views. At the same time, Catholic nations participated in fighting the [[Ottoman Wars in Europe]] against [[Turkey]], which were fought and won under the auspices of the [[Virgin Mary]]. With the victory at [[Battle of Lepanto (1571)]] accredited to her, it "signified the beginning of a strong resurgence of Marian devotions."<ref>Otto Stegmüller, Barock, in ''Marienkunde'', 1967 566</ref> |
|||
===Immaculate Conception of Mary=== |
|||
The baroque literature on Mary experienced unforeseen growth. More than 500 pages of mariological writings were published during the 17th century alone.<ref>A Roskovany, ''conceptu immacolata ex monumentis omnium seculrorum demonstrate III'', Budapest: 1873</ref> The Jesuit [[Francisco Suárez]] was the first theologian to use the [[Thomist]] method on Mariology. Other well known contributors to baroque Mariology were [[Lawrence of Brindisi]], [[Robert Bellarmine]], and [[Francis de Sales]]. |
|||
'''Mary was conceived without original sin ([[De fide]]).''' The '''[[Immaculate Conception]]''' is, according to [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] [[dogma]], the conception of [[BVM(RC)|Mary, the mother of Jesus]] without any stain of [[original sin]], in her mother's womb: the dogma thus says that, from the first moment of her existence, she was preserved by God from the lack of [[sanctifying grace]] that afflicts mankind, and that she was instead filled with [[divine grace]]. It is further believed that she lived a life completely free from [[sin]]. Her immaculate conception in the womb of her mother, by normal sexual intercourse (Christian tradition identifies her parents as Sts. [[Saint Joachim|Joachim]] and [[Saint Anne|Anne]]), should not be confused with the doctrine of the [[Virgin Birth of Jesus|virginal conception]] of her son [[Jesus]]. |
|||
The [[feast of the Immaculate Conception]], celebrated on [[December 8]], was established in 1476 by Pope [[Sixtus IV]]. He did not extraordinarily define it as a dogma at this time, but this does not mean Catholics were free to believe in it or not.<ref>Though questions and ambiguities remained, at least since the time [[Scotus]] had formulated his answer to the last remaining objection (that it would imply Mary needed no saviour) it had been infallibly taught by the ordinary and universal magisterium as at least implied by the deposit of faith (de fide tenenda). The existence of the feast was a strong indication of the Church's belief in the Immaculate Conception, even before its 19th century extraordinary papal definition as a dogma. And consensus since then had been growing that it was not merely implied by the deposit of faith (de fide credenda), but specifically and explicitly revealed (de fide credenda).</ref> The Immaculate Conception was solemnly [[dogmatic definition|defined as a dogma]] by [[Pope Pius IX]] in his constitution ''[[Ineffabilis Deus]]'', on December 8, 1854 as a truth not merely implied by the deposit of faith and discerned by the Church under the infallible guidance of the Holy Spirit (de fide tenenda), but as specifically and explicitly contained as an object of supernatural faith in the Public Revelation of the Deposit of Faith (de fide credenda). |
|||
Baroque Mariology was supported by several popes during the period: [[Pope Paul V]] and [[Gregory XV]] ruled in 1617 and 1622 that it was inadmissible to state that the Virgin was conceived non-immaculate. In 1661, [[Alexander VII]] declared that the soul of Mary was free from original sin. |
|||
The Catholic Church believes the dogma is supported by Scripture (e.g. Mary's being greeted by Angel Gabriel as "full of grace" or "highly favoured"), as well as either directly or indirectly by the writings of many of the [[Church Fathers]], and often calls Mary the [[BVM(RC)|Blessed Virgin]] ([[Gospel of Luke|Luke]] [http://drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=49&ch=001&l=48 1:48]). Catholic theology maintains that, since Jesus became [[incarnation (Christianity)|incarnate]] of the Virgin Mary, it was fitting that she be completely free of sin for expressing her fiat. (Ott, ''Fund.'', Bk 3, Pt. 3, Ch. 2, §3.1.e). |
|||
In 1708, [[Pope Clement XI]] ordered the feast of the ''[[Immaculata]]'' for the whole Church. The [[Feast of the Rosary]] was introduced in 1716; the feast of the [[Seven Sorrows]] in 1727. The ''[[Angelus]]'' prayer was strongly supported by [[Pope Benedict XIII]] in 1724 and by [[Pope Benedict XIV]] in 1742.<ref>F Zöpfl, "Barocke Frömmigkeit", in ''Marienkunde'', 577</ref> |
|||
It seemed to [[Pius XII]] that the Blessed Virgin Mary herself wished to confirm by some special sign the definition, because, less than four years later, in a French town |
|||
During the [[Age of Enlightenment]], the emphasis on [[scientific progress]] and [[rationalism]] put Catholic [[theology]] and Mariology on the defensive. The Church continued to stress the [[virginity]] and special graces, but deemphasized Marian [[cult]]s.<ref>RG Giessler, ''die geistliche Lieddichting im Zeitalter der Aufklärung''. 1928, 987</ref> Some theologians proposed the abolition of all Marian feast days altogether, except those with biblical foundations and the feast of the Assumption.<ref>Benedict Werkmeister, 1801</ref> |
|||
* The Virgin Mother, youthful and benign in appearance, clothed in a shining white garment, covered with a white mantle and girded with a hanging blue cord, showed herself to a simple and innocent girl at the grotto of Massabielle. And to this same girl, who earnestly inquired the name of her, with whose vision she was favoured, she replied with her eyes raised to heaven and sweetly: "I am the Immaculate Conception." <ref>Fulgens corona 3</ref> |
|||
[[Image:Santa Maria della Salute Venice.JPG|thumb|left|240px|[[Santa Maria della Salute]], Venice, 1629.]] |
|||
In this period, a number of significant [[Roman Catholic Marian churches|Marian churches]] were built, often laden with Marian symbols. An example is [[Santa Maria della Salute]] in [[Venice]], built to give thanks to thank the Virgin Mary for the city's deliverance from the [[Plague (disease)|plague]]. The church is full of Marian symbolism: the great dome represents her crown, and the eight sides, the eight points on her symbolic star. |
|||
For the whole Roman Catholic Church the dogma of the Immaculate Conception gained additional significance from these apparitions of [[Our Lady of Lourdes]] in 1858. In [[Lourdes]] a 14-year-old girl, [[Bernadette Soubirous]] |
|||
Many [[Benedictine]]s, such as [[Celestino Sfondrati]] (died 1696) and [[Jesuit]]s,<ref>such as Anton Weissenbach SJ, Franz Neubauer SJ,</ref> supported by pious faithful and their [[sodality|Marian sodalities]] fought against the anti-Marian trends. Increasing [[secularization]] led to the forced closing of most [[monastery|monasteries]] and [[convent]]s, and Marian [[pilgrimage]]s were either discontinued or greatly reduced in number. Some Catholics criticized the practice of the [[rosary]] as not Jesus-oriented and too mechanical, although it was a practice that women especially followed.<ref>D Narr 417</ref> In some places, priests forbade the praying of the rosary during Holy Mass.<ref>In 1790, monastery schools outlawed the praying of the rosary during mass as a distraction. (D Narr 417).</ref> |
|||
In the Roman Catholic Church, the Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception is a [[Holy Day of Obligation]], except where conferences of bishops have decided, with the approval of the Holy See, not to maintain it as such. It is a public holiday in some countries where Roman Catholicism is predominant e.g. Italy. In the [[Philippines]], although this is not a public holiday, the predominance of Catholic Schools make it almost a holiday. |
|||
During this time, Mariologists looked to ''[[The Glories of Mary]]'' and other mariological writings of [[Alphonsus Liguori]], an Italian, whose culture was less affected by the Enlightenment. "Overall, Catholic Mariology during the Enlightenment lost its the high level of development and sophistication, but the basics were kept, on which the 19th century was able to build."<ref>Otto Stegmüller, 1967</ref> |
|||
=== |
===Assumption of Mary=== |
||
{{main|Assumption of Mary|Munificentissimus Deus|Mariology}} |
|||
[[Image:Popepiusix.jpg|thumb|[[Pope Pius IX]] (1846-1878) solemnly declared the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception in 1854.]] |
|||
'''Mary was assumed into heaven with body and soul (de fide).''' Mary, the ever virgin, mother of God was free of original sin. The [[Immaculate Conception]] is one basis for the 1950 dogma. Another was the century old Church-wide veneration of the Virgin Mary as being assumed into heaven, which Pope [[Pius XII]] referred to in [[Deiparae Virginis Mariae]] and reported in [[Munificentissimus Deus]].<ref>In the encclical [[Deiparae Virginis Mariae]] Pope Pius canvased Catholic bishops before making a final decicion on the dogma</ref> Although the [[Assumption of Mary|Assumption]] was only recently defined as [[dogma]], accounts of the bodily assumption of Mary into heaven have circulated since at least the 5th century. The Catholic Church itself interprets chapter 12 of the [[Book of Revelation]] as referring to it. |
|||
Mariology in the 19th century was dominated by discussions about the [[Immaculate Conception]] and the [[First Vatican Council]]. In 1854, [[Pope Pius IX]], with the support of the overwhelming majority of Roman Catholic [[Bishop]]s, whom he had consulted between 1851–1853, proclaimed the dogma of the [[Immaculate Conception]], which had been a traditional belief among the faithful for centuries.<ref>[http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/audiences/alpha/data/aud19930324en.html Vatican website]</ref> |
|||
The earliest assumption narrative is the so-called ''Liber Requiei Mariae'' (''The Book of Mary's Repose''), a narrative which survives intact only in an [[Ge'ez language|Ethiopic]] translation. (Stephen J. Shoemaker, ''Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption''] Oxford University Press, 2002, 2006). Probably composed by the 4th century, this early Christian apocryphal narrative may be as early as the 3rd century. Also quite early are the very different traditions of the [http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/Syriac/Six%20Books%20Wright.pdf ''"Six Books" Dormition narratives'']. The earliest versions of this apocryphon are preserved by several [[Syriac language|Syriac]] manuscripts of the 5th and 6th centuries, although the text itself probably belongs to the 4th century. |
|||
Later apocrypha based on these earlier texts include the [http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormitionG2/dormitionG2.htm ''De Obitu S. Dominae''], attributed to [[John the Theologian|St. John]], a work probably from around the turn of the 6th century that is a summary of the "Six Books" narrative. The story also appears in [http://www.uoregon.edu/~sshoemak/texts/dormitionL/dormitionL1.htm ''De Transitu Virginis''], a late 5th century work ascribed to [[Melito of Sardis|St. Melito of Sardis]] that presents a theologically redacted summary of the traditions in the ''Liber Requiei Mariae''. The ''Transitus Mariae'' tells the story of the apostles being transported by white clouds to the death-bed of Mary, each from the town where he was preaching at the hour. |
|||
The ''[[Decretum Gelasianum]]'' in the 490s declared some ''transitus Mariae'' literature as apocryphal. |
|||
An Armenian letter attributed to [[Dionysus the Areopagite]] also mentions the event, although this is a much later work, written sometime after the 6th century. Other saints also describe it, notably [[Gregory of Tours|St Gregory of Tours]], [[John Damascene|St John Damascene]], and [[Modestus of Jerusalem|St Modestus of Jerusalem]]. |
|||
Eight years earlier, in 1846, the Pope had granted the unanimous wish of the bishops from the United States, and declared the Immaculata the patron of the USA.<ref>Pius IX in Bäumer, 245</ref> During the [[First Vatican Council]], some 108 council fathers requested adding the words "Immaculate Virgin" to the "[[Hail Mary]]" prayer and to add the Immaculata to the [[Litany of Loreto]]. Some fathers requested the dogma of the Immaculate Conception to be included in the [[Creed]] of the Church.<ref>Bauer 566</ref> |
|||
Theological debate about the Assumption continued until 1950 when, in the [[Apostolic Constitution]] [[Munificentissimus Deus]], it was defined as definitive doctrine by Pope [[Pius XII]]: |
|||
Many French Catholics supported making dogma both Papal [[infallibility]] and the [[assumption of Mary]] in the forthcoming ecumenical council.<ref>''Civilta Catolica'', February 6, 1869.</ref> During the [[First Vatican Council]], nine mariological petitions favored a possible assumption dogma. It was strongly opposed by some council fathers, especially those from Germany. On May 8, a majority of the fathers voted to reject making the Assumption a dogma, a position shared by [[Pope Pius IX]]. The concept of [[Co-Redemptrix]] was also discussed but left open. In its support, Council fathers highlighted the divine motherhood of Mary and called |
|||
her the mother of all graces.<ref>Bäumer 566</ref> |
|||
:We pronounce, declare, and define it to be a divinely revealed dogma: that the Immaculate Mother of God, the ever Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory."<ref>Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deus, no 44.</ref><ref>This dogma, too, is a good example of the development of doctrine in Catholic thought. It is a truth infallibly taught since long ago as at least implied by the deposit of faith (de fide tenenda) by the ordinary and universal magisterium, and even sometimes extraordinarily by popes. However, in the centuries before the papal definition the consensus had grown to the point where it was infallibly taught as not merely de fide tenenda, but de fide credenda, by the ordinary and universal magisterium. Finally its credenda status was solemnized by an extraordinary papal definition. It is important to note that the Catholic Church does not base its teaching about the Assumption on any apocryphal account, but rather on discernment of the Tradition of the Church, longstanding teaching on this issue, and other theological reasons.</ref> |
|||
"[[Rosary Pope]]" is a title given to [[Pope Leo XIII]] (1878–1903) because he issued a record eleven encyclicals on the rosary, instituted the Catholic custom of daily rosary prayer during the month of October, and in 1883 created the Feast of ''Queen of the Holy Rosary''.<ref>Lauretanische Litanei, ''Marienlexikon'', St. Ottilien: Eos, 1988, p.41</ref> |
|||
Since the 1870 solemn declaration of [[Papal Infallibility]] by [[Vatican I]] in 1870, this declaration by [[Pius XII]] has been the only [[ex cathedra]] use of Papal Infallibility. While Pope [[Pius XII]] deliberately left open the question of whether Mary died before her Assumption, the more common teaching of the early Fathers is that she did.<ref>As the Virgin Mary remained an ever-virgin and sinless, it is viewed that the Virgin Mary could not thus suffer the consequences of [[Original Sin]], which is chiefly Death. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3819.htm Nicea II Session 6 Decree</ref><ref>http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/NICAEA2.HTM#2 Nicaea II Definition, "without blemish"</ref> |
|||
==Views of the saints== |
|||
{{Main|Mariology of the saints}} |
|||
Roman Catholic Mariology has relied on the writings of numerous saints throughout history who have attested to the central role of Mary in God's plan of salvation. Saints with Mariological orientation include [[Irenaeus of Lyons]], [[Ambrose of Milan]], [[St. Bernard of Clairvaux]], [[Thomas Aquinas]], [[St. John of Damascus]], [[St. Bonaventure]], [[St. Louis de Montfort]], and others. In some cases, the writings of saints such as [[Louis de Montfort]] significantly influenced young seminarians who later became popes, such as [[Pope John Paul II]]. |
|||
==Other Marian doctrines== |
|||
===Early saints=== |
|||
The Catholic Church holds many other teachings about the Virgin Mary, many of which are just as relevant as the defined teachings above. Some flow logically from the formal dogmas of virginity, sinlessness, and immaculate conception. Others are century old teachings, cults and celebrations, which, in the Catholic view, under the infallible guidance of the Holy Spirit, are an integral part of the deposit of Faith handed down by the Church. |
|||
Saint [[Irenaeus of Lyons]] (circa 140-202) was perhaps the earliest of the Church Fathers to develop a thorough Mariology. In his youth, he had met [[Polycarp]] and other Christians who had been in direct contact with the Apostles. Irenaeus set out a forthright account of Mary's role in the "[[economy of salvation]]". According to Irenaeus, Christ, being born out of the [[Virgin Mary]], created a totally new historical situation.<ref>Irenaeus of Lyons, ''Adversus haereses'' 3:22</ref><ref>Irenaeus, Book V, 19,3</ref> This view later influenced [[Ambrose of Milan]] and [[Tertullian]], who wrote about the [[virgin birth]] of the [[Mother of God]]. He believed that the donor of a new birth had also to be born in a totally new way. The "new birth" meant that what was lost through a woman (Eve), was now saved through a woman (Mary).<ref>Tertullian, ''De Carne Christi'' 17</ref> |
|||
===Mary is Mother of all Christians=== |
|||
Saint [[Ambrose of Milan]] (339-397) was an early Church Father whose powerful Mariology influenced contemporary Popes such as [[Pope Damasus]] and [[Siricius]] and later, [[Pope Leo the Great]]. His student [[Augustine of Hippo|Augustine]] and the [[First Council of Ephesus|Council of Ephesus]] were equally under his spell. Ambrose considered the [[virginity]] of Mary and her role as [[Mother of God]] to be central Christian ideas.<ref>Ambrose of Milan, ''CSEL'' 64, 139</ref><ref>Ambrose of Milan, ''De Mysteriis'', 59, PG 16, 410</ref><ref>[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf210.iv.ii.iv.xi.html Ambrose of Milan, ''De Spiritu Sancto'', III, 11,79-80]</ref> |
|||
[[File:Barocci - Madonna del Popolo.jpg|thumb|right|[[Federico Barocci]], ''Madonna del Popolo'' (Madonna of the people) 1579]] |
|||
The Catholic Church teaches that the Virgin Mary is mother of the Church and of all its members, namely all Christians. The Catechism of the Catholic Church states: |
|||
:''"The Virgin Mary . . . is acknowledged and honoured as being truly the Mother of God and of the redeemer.... She is 'clearly the mother of the members of Christ' . . . since she has by her charity joined in bringing about the birth of believers in the Church, who are members of its head." "Mary, Mother of Christ, Mother of the Church."'' <ref>Catechism of the Catholic Church Part 1, Section 963</ref> |
|||
:"Thus she, through whom salvation was being prepared for all people, would be the first to receive the promised fruit of salvation."<ref>Ambrose of Milan, ''Expositio in Lucam'' 2, 17; PL 15, 1640</ref> |
|||
In addition, Mary is seen as mother of Christians because Christians are said in scripture to become spiritually part of the body of Christ. Christians are adopted by Jesus as his "brothers". They therefore share with Him the Fatherhood of God and also the motherhood of Mary. Again, in the [[New Testament]] book of John <ref>Chapter 19. 26-27,</ref> Jesus, from the cross gives the [[John the Apostle|Apostle John]] to Mary as her son, and gives Mary to John as his mother. John here, as the sole remaining Apostle remaining steadfast with Jesus is taken to represent all loyal followers of Jesus from that time on. |
|||
[[Augustine of Hippo|St. Augustine]] (354-430) did not develop an independent Mariology, but his statements on Mary surpassed in number and depths those of other early writers.<ref>O Stegmüller, in ''Marienkunde'', 455</ref> He wrote that the Virgin Mary was "conceived as virgin, gave birth as virgin and stayed virgin forever."<ref>''De Saca virginitate'', 18</ref> Even before the [[Council of Ephesus]], Augustine defended the ever Virgin Mary as the mother of God, who, because of her virginity, is full of grace.<ref>''De Sacra Virginitate'', 6,6, 191.</ref> She was free of any temporal sin, but theologians disagreed as to whether Augustine considered Mary free of original sin as well, with [[Thomas Aquinas]] and [[Bonaventura]], [[Hugo Rahner]] arguing against [[Henry Newman]] and others. Augustine concluded that because of a woman, the whole human race was saved.<ref>"Per feminam mors, per feminam vita", ''De Sacra Virginitate'',289</ref> |
|||
The [[Catholic devotion|devotion]] to the Virgin Mary thus continues to be emphasized in Roman Catholic teachings. For instance, in his encyclical ''Rosarium Virginis Mariae'', [[Pope John Paul II]] discussed how his own motto "Totus Tuus" was inspired by the writings of Saint [[Louis de Montfort]] on total consecration to the Virgin Mary, which he quoted:<ref>[[Pope John Paul II]]'s encyclical ''Rosarium Virginis Mariae'' http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_20021016_rosarium-virginis-mariae_en.html |
|||
The [[Patriarch]] [[Cyril of Alexandria]] (412-444) became famous in [[Church history]] because of his spirited fight to give Mary the title "[[Mother of God]]" during the Council of Ephesus (431). His writings included the homily given in Ephesus and several other sermons.<ref>PG 76,992, Adv. ''Nolentes confiteri Sanctam Virginem esse Deiparem'', pp.76, 259</ref> Some scholars dispute his authorship of certain homilies attributed to him. In several writings, Cyril focused on the love of Jesus for his mother. At the [[Marriage at Cana]], he bowed to her wishes. On the [[Cross]], he overcame his pain and thought of his mother. The overwhelming merit of Cyril of Alexandria was his development of the centre of dogmatic Mariology. Through his teaching of the blessed Virgin Mary as the [[Mother of God]], he created the basis for later Mariological developments. |
|||
</ref>. |
|||
:''Now, since Mary is of all creatures the one most conformed to Jesus Christ, it follows that among all devotions that which most consecrates and conforms a soul to our Lord is devotion to Mary, his Holy Mother, and that the more a soul is consecrated to her the more will it be consecrated to Jesus Christ."'' |
|||
Many early Mariological concepts developed in the Eastern Church. From the West, [[Pope Damasus I]] and others defended Mary against [[Monophysitism]], the teaching that Christ had only a divine nature. Accordingly, Mary is only the [[Mother of God]], not the mother of the human Jesus. [[Pope Leo the Great]] defended the teaching that Christ has two natures, one divine and one human.<ref>''Acta conciliorum Oecumenicorum'', Vol.II,2,1,Nr.5 PL 54</ref><ref>www.dailycatholic.org/history/4ecumen1.htm</ref> |
|||
In a separate address to the Montfortian Fathers, [[Pope John Paul II]] stated that reading Saint [[Louis de Montfort]]'s work on Devotion to Mary had been a "decisive turning point" in his life<ref>[[Pope John Paul II]] on Saint [[Louis de Montfort]] http://www.catholicregister.org/content/view/1402/857/</ref> |
|||
To [[Pope Leo the Great]], Mariology was determined by [[Christology]]. If Christ would be divine only, everything on him would be divine. His eating would be symbolism. Only his divinity would have been crucified, buried and resurrected. Mary would be only the mother of God, and Christians would have no hope for their own [[resurrection]]. The nucleus of Christianity would be destroyed.<ref>PL 54, 221, C 226</ref> He asked for the veneration of the Virgin Mary both at the manger and at the throne of the heavenly Father. The most unusual beginning of a truly human life through her was to give birth to Jesus, the Lord and Son of King David.<ref>''Sermons'', 9,PL54, 227,CF,and 205 BC</ref> |
|||
===Mary as Mediatrix=== |
|||
===Saints since the Middle Ages === |
|||
{{main|Mediatrix}} |
|||
[[File:BartolomeoVirginBernard.jpg|thumb|240px|''The Vision of St Bernard'', by [[Fra Bartolommeo]], c. 1504 ([[Uffizi]]).]] |
|||
In Catholic teachings, Jesus Christ is the only mediator between God and man.<ref>1 Tim, 2,5</ref> He alone reconciled through his death on the Cross creator and creation. But this does not exclude a secondary mediating role for Mary, preparatory, supportive, in the view of several prominent, but not all Catholics. The teaching that Mary intercedes for all believers and especially those who request her intercession through prayer has been held in the Church since early times, for example by Ephraim, the Syrian “after the mediater a mediatrix for the whole world <ref>Oratio IV ad Deiparem</ref> Intercession is something that may be done by all the heavenly [[saint]]s, but Mary is seen as having the greatest intercessionary power. The earliest surviving recorded prayer to Mary is the [[Sub tuum praesidium]], written in Greek <ref>and dating from approximately AD 250</ref>. |
|||
Mary has increasingly been seen as a principal dispenser of God's graces and Advocate for the people of God and is mentioned as such in several official Church documents. [[Pope Pius IX]] used the title in [[Ineffabilis Deus]]. In the first of his so called ''Rosary encyclicals'', [[Supremi Apostolatus]] (1883), [[Pope Leo XIII]] calls Our Lady ''the guardian of our peace and the dispensatrix of heavenly graces.'' The following year, 1884, his encyclical [[Superiore Anno]] speaks of the prayers presented to God ''through her whom He has chosen to be the dispenser of all heavenly graces''. [[Pope Pius X]] employed this title in ''Ad Diem Illud'' in 1904, [[Pope Benedict XV]] introduced it into the Marian liturgy when he created the Marian feast of The [[Mary, Mediatrix of all Graces]] in 1921, In his 1954 [[encyclical]] [[Ad caeli reginam]], Pope Pius XII calls Mary the Mediatrix of peace.<ref>Ad Caeli Reginam, 51</ref> The theological discussion ongoing, neither [[Pius XII]] nor his successors moved to a closure of this issue. |
|||
In his encyclical ''[[Doctor Mellifluus]]'' on Saint [[Bernhard of Clairvaux]], [[Pope Pius XII]] quoted three central elements of Berhard's Mariology: How he explained the [[virginity]] of Mary, the "[[Our Lady, Star of the Sea|Star of the Sea]]"; how the faithful should pray on the Virgin Mary; and, how Bernhard relied on the Virgin Mary as ''[[mediatrix]]''. |
|||
===Co-Redemptrix=== |
|||
:"... the Virgin bring forth her Child without injury to her integrity. And as the ray does not diminish the rightness of the star, so neither did the Child born of her tarnish the beauty of Mary's virginity."<ref>Berhard of Clairvaux quoted in ''[[Doctor Mellifluus]]'' 31</ref> |
|||
{{main|Co-Redemptrix}} |
|||
[[File:Pietro lorenzetti, compianto (dettaglio) basilica inferiore di assisi (1310-1329).jpg|thumb|[[Pietro Lorenzetti]], 1310]] |
|||
[[Co-Redemptrix]] refers to the participation of Mary in the salvation process. Already, [[Irenaeus]], the Church Father (Died 200), referred to Mary as "causa salutis" [cause of our salvation] given her "fiat<ref>."http://www.zenit.org/article-5650?l=english</ref> |
|||
It is teaching, which has been considered since the 15th century <ref>Ott 256</ref> but never declared a dogma. The Roman Catholic view of Co-Redemptrix does not imply that Mary participates as equal part in the redemption of the human race, since Christ is the only redeemer <ref>1Tim 2,5</ref> Mary herself needed redemption and was redeemed by Jesus Christ her son. Being redeemed by Christ, implies that she cannot be his equal part in the redemption process.<ref>Ott Dogmatics 256</ref> |
|||
Co-redemptrix refers to an indirect or unequal but important participation by Mary in the redemption process. She gave free consent to give life to the redeemer, to share his life, to suffer with him under the cross and to sacrifice him for the sake of the redemption of mankind. Co-redemption is not something new. |
|||
:"In dangers, in doubts, in difficulties, think of Mary, call upon Mary. Let not her name leave thy lips, never suffer it to leave your heart."<ref>"Hom. II super 'Missus est'", 17; Migne, P. L., CLXXXIII, 70-b, c, d, 71-a. Quoted in ''Doctor Mellifluus'' 31</ref> |
|||
Papal teaching begin to mention this aspect in official Church documents during the pontificate of [[Pope Pius X]] <ref>Ott 256.</ref> Pius X referred to it in his encyclical [[Ad Diem Illum]].<ref>Ad diem Illum 14</ref> [[Pope Benedict XV]] first described the term in his own right in his [[Apostolic Letter]], ''Inter Soldalica,'' issued March 22, 1918.<ref name="AAS">AAS, 1918, 181</ref><ref name="AAS"/> [[Pope Pius XII]] repeated this argument with slightly different accents in his encyclical [[Mystici Corporis]].<ref>Mystici Corporis 110</ref> In the Papal bull [[Munificentissimus Deus]] on dogma of the assumption, Pope Pius declares that ''“the revered Mother of God, from all eternity joined in a hidden way with Jesus Christ in one and the same decree of predestination, immaculate in her conception, a most perfect virgin in her divine motherhood, as the noble associate of the divine Redeemer'' <ref>Munificentissimus Deus 40</ref> |
|||
Theologically, [[Bernhard of Clairvaux]], a [[Doctor of the Church]], was a fervent supporter of the [[Mediatrix]] interpretation of Mary. God and the World meet in her. Divine life flows through her to the whole creation. She is one with Jesus, who wants to save all and who passes all graces through her.<ref>PL 138, 441</ref> She is the [[Mediatrix]] to God, the ladder on which sinners may climb up to him, the royal road to him, because she is full of grace.<ref>PL 183, 43</ref> |
|||
===Queen of Heaven=== |
|||
:"It is the will of God that we should have nothing, which has not passed through the hands of Mary. It is the will of God, Who would have us obtain everything through the hands of Mary."<ref>Bernhard of Clairvaux, "Sermon", in ''Nat. Mariae'', 7; Migne, P. L., CLXXXIII, 441-b. Pius XII, ''Doctor Mellifluus'' 30</ref> |
|||
{{main|Ad Caeli Reginam|Queen of Heaven}} |
|||
[[Image:Santa Marija Assunta.jpg|thumb|left|Statue (detail) of the Assumption of Mary in [[Attard]], [[Malta]]]] |
|||
The doctrine that the Virgin Mary has been crowned [[Queen of Heaven]] goes back to the early patristic writers of the Church such as] St. [[Gregory Nazianzen]] "the Mother of the King of the universe," and the "Virgin Mother who brought forth the King of the whole world," <ref>S. Gregorius Naz., Poemata dogmatica, XVIII, v. 58; PG XXXVII, 485.</ref> [[Prudentius]], the Mother marvels "that she has brought forth God as man, and even as Supreme King." <ref>Prudentius, Dittochaeum, XXVII: PL LX, 102 A.</ref> and, St. [[Ephrem]], "Let Heaven sustain me in its embrace, because I am honored above it. For heaven was not Thy mother, but Thou hast made it Thy throne. How much more honorable and venerable than the throne of a king is her mother." <ref>S. Ephraem, Hymni de B. Maria, ed. Th. J. Lamy, t. II, Mechliniae, 1886, hymn. XIX, p. 624.</ref> The Catholic Church often sees Mary as queen in heaven, bearing a crown of twelve stars in [[Book of Revelation|Revelation]]<ref>12, verses 1-5.</ref> |
|||
Many Popes have given tribute to it. Mary is the Queen of Heaven and Earth, (Pius IX), Queen and Ruler of the Universe (Leo XIII) and Queen of the World (Pius XII) <ref>in:enyclical Ad caeli reginam</ref> The theological and logical foundation of these titles rests in the dogma of Mary as the Mother of God. As mother of God, she participates in his salvation plan. The Catholic faith teaches that Mary, the Virgin Mother of God, reigns with a mother's solicitude over the entire world, just as she is crowned in heavenly blessedness with the glory of a Queen<ref>Ad Caeli reginam 39</ref>: |
|||
[[Saint Alphonsus Liguori]] (1696–1787), a Doctor of the Church, was an effective defender of Mariology against the ideas of [[Jansenism]]. He wrote ''[[The Glories of Mary]]'' to present a basis for Mariology, derived from Scripture and the works of the [[Church Fathers]]. He greatly influenced Catholic Mariology during the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]] period. His Marian enthusiasm contrasted with what some believers considered the colder [[rationalism]] of the Enlightenment. Mainly pastoral in nature, his Mariology rediscovered, integrated and defended the Mariology of Augustine, Ambrose and other fathers. It represented an intellectual defence of Mariology in the eighteenth century.<ref>P Hitz, Alfons v. Liguori, in ''Marienkunde'', 1967 130</ref> |
|||
:Certainly, in the full and strict meaning of the term, only Jesus Christ, the God-Man, is King; but Mary, too, as Mother of the divine Christ, as His associate in the redemption, in his struggle with His enemies and His final victory over them, has a share, though in a limited and analogous way, in His royal dignity. For from her union with Christ she attains a radiant eminence transcending that of any other creature; from her union with Christ she receives the royal right to dispose of the treasures of the Divine Redeemer's Kingdom; from her union with Christ finally is derived the inexhaustible efficacy of her maternal intercession before the Son and His Father.<ref>Ad Caeli reginam 39</ref> |
|||
[[Saint Louis de Montfort]]'s highly influential ''[[True Devotion to Mary]]'' synthesized many of the earlier saints' writings and teachings on Mary. De Montfort's approach of "total consecration to Jesus Christ through Mary" had a strong impact on Marian devotion both in popular piety and in the spirituality of [[religious order]]s. One of his well-known followers was Pope [[John Paul II]] of the 20th century. According to his Apostolic Letter ''[[Rosarium Virginis Mariae]]'', the pontiff's personal motto ''[[Totus Tuus]]'' (Totally yours) was inspired by St. Louis' doctrine on the excellence of Marian devotion and total consecration. He quoted: |
|||
===Reparations to the Virgin Mary=== |
|||
:"Since Mary is of all creatures the one most conformed to Jesus Christ, it follows that among all devotions that which most consecrates and conforms a soul to our Lord is devotion to Mary, his Holy Mother, and that the more a soul is consecrated to her the more will it be consecrated to Jesus Christ.'" |
|||
[[Roman Catholic]] teachings and traditions includes specific devotions as ''[[Acts of Reparation to the Virgin Mary]]'' for insults that she suffers. The [[Raccolta]] Catholic prayer book (approved by a Decree of 1854, and published by the [[Holy See]] in 1898) includes a number of such prayers.<ref>Ann Ball, 2003 ''Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices ''ISBN 0-87973-910-X</ref><ref>Catholic Encyclopedia http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12620a.htm</ref><ref>Joseph P. Christopher et al., 2003 ''The Raccolta'' St Athanasius Press ISBN 978-0-9706526-6-9</ref> |
|||
These devotions and prayers do not involve a petition for a living or deceased beneficiary, but aim to [[Acts of reparation|repair the sins]] of others against the Virgin Mary. |
|||
In an address to the Montfortian Fathers, the pontiff also said that his reading the saint's work ''The True Devotion to Mary'' was a "decisive turning point" in his life. |
|||
==Mariology as theology of the people == |
==Mariology as theology of the people == |
||
Line 161: | Line 200: | ||
Three Portuguese children, [[Lucia dos Santos]], [[Jacinta Marto]], and [[Francisco Marto]], were equally young and without much education when they reported the apparition of [[Our Lady of Fatima]] in 1917. The local administrator initially jailed the children and threatened that he would boil them one by one in a pot of oil. The children were consoled by the other inmates in the jail, and then led the inmates in praying the Rosary.<ref>John De Marchi, ''The Immaculate Heart'', New York: Farrar, Straus and Young</ref> |
Three Portuguese children, [[Lucia dos Santos]], [[Jacinta Marto]], and [[Francisco Marto]], were equally young and without much education when they reported the apparition of [[Our Lady of Fatima]] in 1917. The local administrator initially jailed the children and threatened that he would boil them one by one in a pot of oil. The children were consoled by the other inmates in the jail, and then led the inmates in praying the Rosary.<ref>John De Marchi, ''The Immaculate Heart'', New York: Farrar, Straus and Young</ref> |
||
With millions of followers and Roman Catholic believers, the reported visions at Fatima gathered respect. After a canonical enquiry, the visions of Fatima were officially declared "worthy of belief" in October 1930 by the Bishop of Leiria-Fatima.<ref>"In virtue of considerations made known, and others which for reason of brevity we omit; humbly invoking the Divine Spirit and placing ourselves under the protection of the most Holy Virgin, and after hearing the opinions of our Rev. Advisors in this diocese, we hereby: 1) Declare worthy of belief, the visions of the shepherd children in the Cova da Iria, parish of Fatima, in this diocese, from 13 May to 13 October 1917. 2) Permit officially the cult of Our Lady of Fatima.1 ", Bishope of Lire-Fatima, October 13, 1930.</ref> Popes [[Pius XII]], [[Pope John XXIII|John XXIII]], [[Paul VI]] and [[John Paul II]] voiced their acceptance of the supernatural origin of the Fatima events. John Paul II credited Our Lady of Fatima with saving his life following an assassination attempt on the Feast of Our Lady of Fatima, 1981. He donated the bullet that wounded him to the Roman Catholic sanctuary at [[Fátima, Portugal]]. |
With millions of followers and Roman Catholic believers, the reported visions at Fatima gathered respect. After a canonical enquiry, the visions of Fatima were officially declared "worthy of belief" in October 1930 by the Bishop of Leiria-Fatima.<ref>"In virtue of considerations made known, and others which for reason of brevity we omit; humbly invoking the Divine Spirit and placing ourselves under the protection of the most Holy Virgin, and after hearing the opinions of our Rev. Advisors in this diocese, we hereby: 1) Declare worthy of belief, the visions of the shepherd children in the Cova da Iria, parish of Fatima, in this diocese, from 13 May to 13 October 1917. 2) Permit officially the cult of Our Lady of Fatima.1 ", Bishope of Lire-Fatima, October 13, 1930.</ref> Popes [[Pius XII]], [[Pope John XXIII|John XXIII]], [[Paul VI]] and [[John Paul II]] voiced their acceptance of the supernatural origin of the Fatima events. John Paul II credited Our Lady of Fatima with saving his life following an assassination attempt on the Feast of Our Lady of Fatima, 1981. He donated the bullet that wounded him to the Roman Catholic sanctuary at [[Fátima, Portugal]]. |
||
Mariologists refer to Saint [[Marguerite Marie Alacoque]], as "living proof how Marian devotion is linked to 'Christology'" and the adoration of Jesus Christ.<ref>J.M.Böhr, ''Marguerite Marie Alacoque'', Regensburg, p. 101</ref> She made a vow at age 14 to dedicate her life to the Virgin Mary. As a simple Marian nun, she was subjected to many trials to prove the genuineness of her vocation and her [[visions of Jesus and Mary]] relating to the [[Sacred Heart]]. She was initially rebuffed by her mother superior and was unable to convince theologians of the validity of her visions. A noted exception was Saint [[Claude de la Colombière]], who supported her. The devotion to the [[Sacred Heart]] was officially recognized 75 years after Alacoque's death.<ref>''Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church'', (Oxford University Press 2005 ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3)</ref> In his encyclical ''[[Miserentissimus Redemptor]]'', [[Pope Pius XI]] stated that Jesus Christ had "manifested Himself" to Saint Margaret and referred to the conversation between Jesus and Saint Margaret several times.<ref>''[[Miserentissimus Redemptor]]'', Encyclical of [[Pope Pius XI]] [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_08051928_miserentissimus-redemptor_en.html]</ref> |
Mariologists refer to Saint [[Marguerite Marie Alacoque]], as "living proof how Marian devotion is linked to 'Christology'" and the adoration of Jesus Christ.<ref>J.M.Böhr, ''Marguerite Marie Alacoque'', Regensburg, p. 101</ref> She made a vow at age 14 to dedicate her life to the Virgin Mary. As a simple Marian nun, she was subjected to many trials to prove the genuineness of her vocation and her [[visions of Jesus and Mary]] relating to the [[Sacred Heart]]. She was initially rebuffed by her mother superior and was unable to convince theologians of the validity of her visions. A noted exception was Saint [[Claude de la Colombière]], who supported her. The devotion to the [[Sacred Heart]] was officially recognized 75 years after Alacoque's death.<ref>''Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church'', (Oxford University Press 2005 ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3)</ref> In his encyclical ''[[Miserentissimus Redemptor]]'', [[Pope Pius XI]] stated that Jesus Christ had "manifested Himself" to Saint Margaret and referred to the conversation between Jesus and Saint Margaret several times.<ref>''[[Miserentissimus Redemptor]]'', Encyclical of [[Pope Pius XI]] [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xi_enc_08051928_miserentissimus-redemptor_en.html]</ref> |
||
Line 170: | Line 209: | ||
While these and many other persons all faced problems for an initial period, the Church, with some delay, listened to the Mariological faith, as an official [[Holy See|Vatican]] website admitted in 2004. Thus, "The [[dogma]] of the [[Immaculate Conception]] was defined by Pius IX not so much because of proofs in [[Scripture]] or ancient [[tradition]], but due to a profound ''[[sensus fidelium]]'', a century-old sense of the faithful, and the Magisterium".<ref name="fides.org">[http://www.fides.org/eng/approfondire/totustuus/immacolata02.html Agenzia Fides - Congregazione per l'Evangelizzazione dei Popoli<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> |
While these and many other persons all faced problems for an initial period, the Church, with some delay, listened to the Mariological faith, as an official [[Holy See|Vatican]] website admitted in 2004. Thus, "The [[dogma]] of the [[Immaculate Conception]] was defined by Pius IX not so much because of proofs in [[Scripture]] or ancient [[tradition]], but due to a profound ''[[sensus fidelium]]'', a century-old sense of the faithful, and the Magisterium".<ref name="fides.org">[http://www.fides.org/eng/approfondire/totustuus/immacolata02.html Agenzia Fides - Congregazione per l'Evangelizzazione dei Popoli<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> |
||
The Vatican quotes in this context [[Fulgens Corona]], where [[Pius XII]] supported such a faith: |
The Vatican quotes in this context [[Fulgens Corona]], where [[Pius XII]] supported such a faith: |
||
: If the popular praises "of the Blessed Virgin Mary be given the careful consideration they deserve, who will dare to doubt that she, who was purer than the angels and at all times pure, was at any moment, even for the briefest instant, not free from every stain of sin?"<ref>Fulgens Corona, 10</ref> |
: If the popular praises "of the Blessed Virgin Mary be given the careful consideration they deserve, who will dare to doubt that she, who was purer than the angels and at all times pure, was at any moment, even for the briefest instant, not free from every stain of sin?"<ref>Fulgens Corona, 10</ref> |
||
In several Marian teachings, such as the Immaculate Conception, the "theology of the people", the profound and century-old sense of the faithful took precedence over academic theology.<ref name="fides.org"/> Identical arguments were made for the dogma of the [[Assumption of Mary|Assumption]] by Pope Pius XII.<ref>Schmaus Mariologie, 220-247</ref> To some non-Catholics and even to some theologically oriented Catholics, like [[Karl Rahner]], this ''[[sensus fidei]]'' has some problems.<ref>Karl Rahner, ''Das neue Dogma'', 1951, Hans Küng, 2008</ref> |
In several Marian teachings, such as the Immaculate Conception, the "theology of the people", the profound and century-old sense of the faithful took precedence over academic theology.<ref name="fides.org"/> Identical arguments were made for the dogma of the [[Assumption of Mary|Assumption]] by Pope Pius XII.<ref>Schmaus Mariologie, 220-247</ref> To some non-Catholics and even to some theologically oriented Catholics, like [[Karl Rahner]], this ''[[sensus fidei]]'' has some problems.<ref>Karl Rahner, ''Das neue Dogma'', 1951, Hans Küng, 2008</ref> |
||
Nevertheless, popular Mariology has been a major driving force in the past 150 years. It led to the two [[infallible]], ''[[ex cathedra]]'' [[dogma]]s: [[Immaculate Conception]] (1854) and [[Assumption of Mary|Assumption]] (1950). Since the 1870 solemn declaration of [[Papal Infallibility]] by [[Vatican I]], the 1950 declaration by [[Pius XII]] has been the first and only ''ex cathedra'' use of papal infallibility. |
Nevertheless, popular Mariology has been a major driving force in the past 150 years. It led to the two [[infallible]], ''[[ex cathedra]]'' [[dogma]]s: [[Immaculate Conception]] (1854) and [[Assumption of Mary|Assumption]] (1950). Since the 1870 solemn declaration of [[Papal Infallibility]] by [[Vatican I]], the 1950 declaration by [[Pius XII]] has been the first and only ''ex cathedra'' use of papal infallibility. Thus while the dogmatic definitions of the [[Assumption of Mary|Assumption]], took place only in the 20th century, the sensus fidelium was already being shaped in the Middle Ages, and by 1530, [[Antonio da Correggio]] had completed his contract for the elaborate scene of the [[Assumption of the Virgin (Correggio)|Assumption in the Cathedral of Palermo]].<ref>''Art treasures in Italy'' by Giulio Carlo Argan, Bernard Samuel Myers, Trewin Copplestone 1969 ASIN: B001KV9P90 page 167</ref> |
||
===The multitude of perspectives=== |
|||
== 20th-century developments == |
|||
[[File:JPIIGuadalupeDF.JPG|thumb|left|A statute of [[John Paul II]] with [[Our Lady of Guadalupe]], made entirely with keys donated by Mexicans.]] |
|||
Mariology in the 20th century was dominated by a genuine Marian enthusiasm. Fifteen hundred years after the [[First Council of Ephesus|Council of Ephesus]], [[Pope Pius XI]] issued the [[encyclical]] ''Lux Veritatis'', reminding the [[Orthodox Christianity|Orthodox Christians]] of their common faith. He presided over a Mariological congress in 1931. During the 20th century, [[Pope Pius XII]] issued the [[Dogma of the Assumption]] and the [[Second Vatican Council]] declared Mary to be the ''Mother of the Church''.<ref name="Bäumer 534">Bäumer 534</ref> |
|||
Throughout the centuries, Catholics have viewed the Virgin Mary from a multitude of perspectives, at times derived from specific Marian attributes ranging from queenship to humility, and at times based on cultural preferences of events taking place at specific points in history.<ref>''The thousand faces of the Virgin Mary'' by George Henry Tavard 1996 ISBN 0814659144 pages vii–viii and 81</ref><ref>''Catholic beliefs and traditions: ancient and ever new'' by John F. O'Grady 2002 ISBN 0809140470 page 183</ref> |
|||
===Pope Pius XII=== |
|||
[[Image:Ida10-1.jpg|thumb|'''[[Pope Pius XII Consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary|Consecration of Pope Pius XII]]'''<ref>October 31, 1942</ref> "To you and to your Immaculate Heart in this tragic hour of human history We entrust and consecrate the whole world torn by bitter strive."]] |
|||
[[Pope Pius XII]] [[Pope Pius XII Consecration to the Immaculate Heart of Mary|consecrated]] Russia to the [[Immaculate Heart of Mary]]. He prescribed this Feast for the whole Church in 1944. In 1950, [[Pope Pius XII]] [[dogmatic definition|defined]] the [[Assumption of Mary]] as being an article of faith for Roman Catholics. This was the first (and to date only) [[ex cathedra]] exercise of [[papal infallibility]] since [[Vatican I]]. In 1950 and in 1958, he authorized institutions for increased academic research into the veneration of the [[BVM(RC)|Blessed Virgin Mary]] (see below). |
|||
An example of the changing perspectives on the Virgin Mary based on specific spiritual views, and its adoption within a culture a world away is the transformation of the image of Mary from a [[Queen of Heaven|Heavenly Queen]] to a [[Virgin of humility|mother of humility]], and the construction of views to accommodate both perspectives. While depictions of the Virgin Mary as the [[Queen of Heaven]] or [[Coronation of the Virgin]] by artists such as [[Paolo Veneziano]] or [[Giuliano da Rimini]] were common in the early part of the 14th century, they did not fit with the virtue of [[humility]] which was a key tenet of the spirituality of Saint [[Francis of Assisi]]. The concept of the [[Virgin of humility]] was developed in the 14th century in order to accommodate [[Order of Saint Francis|Franciscan]] piety, by depicting the [[Madonna (art)|Madonna]] sitting on the ground, rather than a throne. It offered a view of the Virgin Mary (often barefoot) as a mother nursing a child, rather than a Queen in a coronation scene.<ref>''A history of ideas and images in Italian art'' by James Hall 1983 ISBN 0064333175 page 223</ref><ref>''Iconography of Christian Art'' by Gertrud Schiller 1971 ASIN: B0023VMZMA page 112</ref><ref>''Renaissance art: a topical dictionary'' by Irene Earls 1987 ISBN 0313246580 page 174</ref> |
|||
In 1953, Pope Pius ordered a [[Marian year]] for 1954, the first in Church history. The year was filled with Marian initiatives, in the areas of Mariology, cultural events, charity and social gatherings.<ref name="Bäumer 534"/> In his encyclicals ''[[Fulgens Corona]]'' and ''[[Ad Caeli Reginam]]'', Pius presented a synthesis of the Mariology of the Church and warned against excesses and timid under-representation of the Catholic faith. In 1953, Pope Pius introduced the feast [[Queenship of Mary]]. In several encyclicals and apostolic letters to the people of Poland and other countries behind the Iron Curtain, he expressed certainty that the Blessed Virgin Mary would triumph over her enemies.<ref>add encyclicals</ref> Pope Pius [[canonize]]d several persons who demonstrated a strong Marian faith and spirituality – and sometimes visions – such as [[Louis de Montfort]], [[Peter Chanel]], [[Jeanne de Lestonnac]], [[Pope Pius X]], [[Catherine Labouré]], [[Anthony Mary Claret]], and [[Gemma Galgani]]. |
|||
As the Franciscans began to preach in China, the notion of the ''Virgin of humility'' resonated well with the Chinese, partly due to the cultural acceptance of humility as a virtue in China, and partly due to its similarity to the motherly, merciful figure of [[Kuanyin]], which was much admired in south China.<ref>Lauren Arnold, 1999 ''Princely Gifts & Papal Treasures: The Franciscan Mission to China'' by ISBN 0967062802 page 151</ref><ref>Lauren Arnold in ''Atlantic Monthly'', September 2007</ref><ref>''The great encounter of China and the West'' by David E. Mungello 1999 ISBN 0847694399 page 27</ref> However, by the middle of the 15th century, a dual view had emerged in Europe, as represented by [[Domenico di Bartolo]]'s 1433 [[Madonna of humility]] which expressed the symbolic duality of her nature: an earthly barefoot woman, as well as a heavenly queen. Despite her low, sitting position, the depiction of star and the gems, as well as a halo, signify the regal status of the Virgin, as she is being attended to while she holds the [[Child Jesus]].<ref>''Art and music in the early modern period'' by Franca Trinchieri Camiz, Katherine A. McIver ISBN 0754606899 page 15</ref> |
|||
===Second Vatican Council === |
|||
[[Vatican Two]] (1962–1965) issued a pastoral summary of Catholic doctrine on Mary, in ''[[Lumen Gentium]]''. Mariologists had hoped for a dogma on Mary as [[Mediatrix]], the foundations of which were laid by several popes, especially [[Leo XIII]], [[Pius X]], [[Benedict XV]], and [[Pius XII]]. It was considered a "clear case". The preparations for the council included an independent schema "About the Blessed Virgin Mary, mother of God and Mother of the People."<ref name="ReferenceA">Leo Cardinal Scheffczyk, Vaticanum II, in ''Marienlexikon'', 567</ref> Some observers interpreted the renunciation of this document on Mary as minimalism; others interpreted her inclusion as a chapter into the Church document as underlining her role for the Church.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> |
|||
Saint [[Juan Diego]]'s account of the appearance of the [[Virgin of Guadalupe]] to him in 1531 on [[Tepeyac Hill]] in Mexico provides another example of the cultural adaptation of the view of the Virgin Mary. Juan Diego did not describe the Virgin Mary as either European or Middle Eastern, but as a tanned [[Aztec]] princess who spoke in his local [[Nahuatl]] language, and not in [[Spanish language|Spanish]]. The image of the Virgin of Guadalupe that is highly venerated in Mexico has the appearance of a South American, rather than a European woman, and the clothing of the Virgin of Guadalupe has been identified as that of an Aztec princess. The Virgin of Guadalupe was a turning point in the conversion of South America to Catholicism, and is the primary view of Mary among millions of Catholics in Mexico in the 21st century.<ref>''Mujer del maiz'' by Angel Vigil 1994 ISBN 1563081946 pages 16–19</ref><ref name=Somervill >''Empire of the Aztecs'' by Barbara A. Somervill 2009 ISBN 1604131497 page 132</ref><ref>''Our Lady of Guadalupe'' by Jeanette Rodríguez 1994 ISBN 0292770626 pages 44–46</ref> Pope John Paul II reinforced the localization of this view by permitting local Aztec dances during the ceremony in which he declared Juan Diego a saint, spoke in Nahuatl as part of the ceremony, called Juan Diego "the talking eagle" and asked him to show "the way that leads to the ''Dark Virgin'' of Tepeyac".<ref name=Somervill /> |
|||
The Marian chapter has five parts which link Mary to the salvation mysteries. These continue in the Church, which Christ founded as his mystical body. Her role in relation to her son is a subordinated one. Highlighted are her personality and fullness of grace. The second part describes her role in salvation history. Her role as a mediator is detailed, as Mary is considered to secure to our salvation through her many intercessions after her assumption into heaven. The Council refused to adopt the title "mediator of all graces" and defined her simply as mediator.<ref>Leo Cardinal Scheffczyk, Vaticanum II, in ''Marienlexikon'', 569</ref> |
|||
<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/homilies/2002/documents/hf_jp-ii_hom_20020731_canonization-mexico_en.html |title=Canonization of Juan Diego Cuauhtlatoatzin |accessdate=November 18, 2010}}</ref><ref>''The image of Guadalupe'' by Jody Brant Smith 1995 ISBN 0865544212 pages 1–2</ref> |
|||
The view of the Virgin Mary as a "miracle worker" has existed for centuries and is still held by many Catholics in the 21st century.<ref>''Miracles of Our Lady'' by Gonzalo de Berceo, Richard Terry Mount, Annette Grant Cash 1997 ISBN 0813120195 page 6–7</ref><ref>''Miracles of the Blessed Virgin Mary'' by Johannes Herolt, C. C. Swinton Blandpages 2004 ISBN 1419173081 pages 4–6</ref> The legends of the miracles of the ''Maddona of [[Orsanmichele]]'' in [[Florence]], Italy go back to the [[Renaissance]].<ref>''Piety and charity in late medieval Florence'' by John Henderson 1997 ISBN 0226326888 page 196</ref> The legends of miracles performed by the image of the [[Black Madonna of Cz?stochowa]] also go back for centuries, and it continues to be venerated today as the Patron of [[Poland]].<ref>''Pilgrimage to images in the fifteenth century'' by Robert Maniura 2004 ISBN 1843830558 page 104</ref><ref>''Maximilian Kolbe: Saint of Auschwitz'' by Elaine Murray Stone 1997 ISBN 0809166372 pages 7–8</ref> Every year, millions of Catholic pilgrims visit the Basilica at [[Our Lady of Lourdes]] in search of miraculous cures.<ref>''Lourdes: A History of Its Apparitions and Cures'' by Georges Bertrin 2004 ISBN 1417981237 page 181</ref><ref>''The encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 3'' by Erwin Fahlbusch, Geoffrey William Bromiley 2003 ISBN 9004126546 page 339</ref> Although millions of Catholics hope for miracles on their pilgrimages, the Vatican has generally been reluctant to approve of modern miracles, unless they have been subject to extensive analysis.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,982807,00.html |title=''Modern Miracles Have Strict Rules'' (David van Biega, ''Time Magazine'' April 10 1995 |accessdate=November, 18, 2010}}</ref> |
|||
==Mediatrix and Co-Redemptrix== |
|||
[[Image:LeoXIII1900.jpg|thumb|left|[[Rosary Pope]] [[Leo XIII]] - His eleven rosary encyclicals fully embrace the concept of Mary mediating all graces.]] |
|||
The mariological concepts [[Mediatrix]] and [[Co-Redemptrix]] are distinct from each other. They have not been dogmatically defined by the Church, but popular and ecclesiastical support for them has continued to grow in recent years. They have been referred to in papal encyclicals, and supported by various theologians, from the 19th century Father [[Frederick William Faber]]'s book ''The Sorrows of Mary'', to the highly respected 20th century mariologist (and advisor to the Holy Office) Father [[Gabriel Roschini]].<ref>[[Gabriel Roschini]], ''Compendium Mariologiae'', Roma 1946.</ref> At [[Vatican II]], Italian, Spanish and Polish bishops worked to define the dogma of these concepts, but others were not prepared to deal with the issues. Some resistance to them continues within Vatican circles. |
|||
== Eastern Catholic differences == |
|||
In the early 1990s, the faithful gathered more than six million signatures from 148 countries, including those of [[Mother Teresa of Calcutta]], [[Cardinal John O'Connor]] of New York, and 41 other cardinals and 550 bishops, supporting a petition that urged [[Pope John Paul II]] to use [[Papal infallibility]] to declare Mary as Mediatrix and Co-Redemptrix. On February 8, 2008, five Roman Catholic Cardinals issued a petition asking [[Pope Benedict XVI]] to declare dogmatically the Blessed Virgin Mary as both [[Co-Redemptrix]] and [[Mediatrix]].<ref>Vatican News on the Mediatrix Petition to the Pope http://www.zenit.org/article-21743?l=english</ref> A lay movement called ''Vox Populi Mariae Mediatrici'' (Voice of the People for Mary Mediatrix) provides petitions that can be signed by Roman Catholics at large and sent to the Pope in support of a formal dogmatic definition.<ref>EWTN article on Vox Popoli http://www.ewtn.com/library/MARY/MEDIATRI.HTM</ref><ref>Vox Populi website http://www.voxpopuli.org</ref> |
|||
===Mediatrix === |
|||
{{Main|Mediatrix}} |
|||
{{Confusing|date=October 2010}} |
|||
The concept [[Mediatrix]] has two meanings: Mary gave birth to the Redeemer, who is the fountain of all grace. Therefore, she participated in the mediating of grace. Secondly, since Mary was assumed into heaven, she participates in the mediating of divine graces of her Son. Popes, such as Leo XIII through Pius XII, have traditionally supported both interpretations.<ref>This will be expanded with several quotes and sources.</ref> |
|||
Saint [[Thomas Aquinas]] argued that only Christ can be the perfect mediator between God and mankind. He went on to say that others were called mediator because they assist and prepare the union between God and man.<ref>Thomas Aquinas, ''Summa'', III, 26,1</ref> There is no question among Catholic theologians{{POV-statement|date=October 2010}}, that Jesus Christ is the only mediator between God and the human race. (Tim. 2,5). This does not exclude a participation of Mary in the mediator mystery of her son.{{Clarify|date=October 2010}} |
|||
In the 19th century, [[Mediatrix]] appears in the papal bull [[Ineffabilis Deus]] of [[Pope Pius IX]] and in several [[rosary]] encyclicals of [[Pope Leo XIII]].<ref>''Adjutricem'', September 5, 1895 and ''Fidentem Piumque'', September 20, 1896</ref> [[Pope Pius X]] used it in the encyclical ''[[Ad Diem Illum]]'', and [[Pope Benedict XV]] introduced it in his new Marian feast day [[Mary Mediatrix of all graces]] established in 1921.<ref>celebrated May 31</ref> Popes traditionally use encyclicals and feast days to promote Christian teaching. The Feast Day of [[Mary Mediatrix of all graces]] is viewed as a clear sign that Pope Benedict intended to promote the Marian role of mediatrix. |
|||
In his [[encyclical]] ''[[Redemptoris Mater]]'', [[Pope John Paul II]] said: |
|||
:Thus there is a mediation: Mary places herself between her Son and mankind in the reality of their wants, needs and sufferings. She puts herself "in the middle", that is to say she acts as a mediatrix not as an outsider, but in her position as mother. She knows that as such she can point out to her Son the needs of mankind, and in fact, she "has the right" to do so. Her mediation is thus in the nature of intercession: Mary "intercedes" for mankind.<ref>Pope John Paul II's encyclical [[Redemptoris Mater]] http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031987_redemptoris-mater_en.html</ref> |
|||
===Co-Redemptrix=== |
|||
{{Roman Catholicism}} |
|||
{{Main|Co-Redemptrix}} |
|||
The concept of [[Co-Redemptrix]] refers to the important participation by Mary in the redemption process, although it is indirect or unequal to that of Christ. She gave free consent to give life to the Redeemer, to share his life, to suffer with him under the Cross and to sacrifice him for the sake of the redemption of mankind.<ref>Mark Miravalle, 1993 ''"With Jesus": the story of Mary Co-redemptrix'' ISBN 1579182410 page 11</ref> |
|||
The concept of Co-redemption is of longstanding in Catholic tradition and thought. [[Church Father]] [[Irenaeus]] (d. 200) referred to Mary as ''causa salutis'' [cause of our salvation] given her ''fiat''.<ref>"http://www.zenit.org/article-5650?l=english</ref> It is a teaching which has been considered since the 15th century,<ref>Ott 256</ref> but never declared a dogma. The Roman Catholic view of Co-Redemptrix does not imply that Mary participates as equal part in the redemption of the human race, since Christ is the only redeemer.<ref>1Tim 2,5</ref> Mary needed redemption, which she received from Jesus Christ her son. Having been redeemed by Christ, she cannot be his equal part in the redemption process.<ref>Ott, ''Dogmatics'', 256</ref> |
|||
During the pontificate of [[Pope Pius X]], papal teaching began to mention this aspect in official Church documents.<ref>Ott, 256.</ref> Saint Pius stated in his encyclical ''[[Ad Diem Illum]]'': "We are then, it will be seen, very far from attributing to the Mother of God a productive power of grace - a power which belongs to God alone. Yet, since Mary carries it over all in holiness and union with Jesus Christ, and has been associated by Jesus Christ in the work of redemption, she merits for us ''de congruo'', in the language of theologians, what Jesus Christ merits for us ''de condigno'', and she is the supreme Minister of the distribution of graces."<ref>''Ad diem Illum'', 14</ref> Theologians disagree as to whether the Pontiff refers here to the concept of Mary as Co-Redemptrix or as Mediatrix of all graces. |
|||
[[Pope Benedict XV]] first described the term in his [[Apostolic Letter]], ''Inter Soldalica'', issued March 22, 1918.<ref name="AAS, 1918, 181">AAS, 1918, 181</ref> "As the Blessed Virgin Mary does not seem to participate in the public life of Jesus Christ, and then, suddenly appears at the stations of his cross, she is not there without divine intention. She suffers with her suffering and dying son, almost as if she would have died herself. For the salvation of mankind, she gave up her rights as the mother of her son and sacrificed him for the reconciliation of divine justice, as far as she was permitted to do. Therefore, one can say, she redeemed with Christ the human race."<ref name="AAS, 1918, 181"/> |
|||
[[Pope Pius XII]] repeated this argument with different accents in his encyclical ''[[Mystici Corporis]]'' (1943): "It was she, the second Eve, who, free from all sin, original or personal, and always more intimately united with her Son, offered Him on [[Golgotha]] to the Eternal Father for all the children of [[Adam]], sin-stained by his unhappy fall, and her mother's rights and her mother's love were included."<ref>''Mystici Corporis'', 110</ref> In the Papal bull ''[[Munificentissimus Deus]]'' on the dogma of the Assumption, Pope Pius declares "the revered Mother of God, from all eternity joined in a hidden way with Jesus Christ in one and the same decree of predestination, immaculate in her conception, a most perfect virgin in her divine motherhood, as the noble associate of the divine Redeemer."<ref>Munificentissimus Deus 40</ref> |
|||
===Ecumenical implications=== |
|||
Some prominent Mariologists openly express the opinion that in the justified search for unity among Christians, Marian beliefs and devotions may be understated by some representatives of the Roman Catholic Church, starting with the [[Vatican II]] document ''[[Lumen Gentium]]''. [[Cardinal (Catholicism)|Cardinal]] [[Leo Scheffczyk]] said about the Marian chapter: "the coldness and reserve of this document can be explained, as it is openly admitted, in showing consideration for the ecumenical dialogues especially with Protestants. The success of this justifiable method, should not be overrated. And it does not stop theology, to say more."<ref name="ReferenceB">Leo Cardinal Scheffczyk, "Vaticanum II", in ''Marienlexikon'', 571</ref> He disagreed with those who considered the document as not satisfying conservatives, liberals, Orthodox and Protestants. He stated the document contained visible elements for a Mariological bridging of positions, a bridging, which he concluded had so far not succeeded.<ref name="ReferenceB"/> According to the cardinal, "The decisive basic statements (on Mary) are compromises, which narrow the richness of the existing faith and invite diverging interpretations, such as the accusation, the Council eliminated the Mediatrix teachings."<ref>Leo Cardinal Scheffczyk, "Vaticanum II", in ''Marienlexikon'',570</ref> |
|||
== Mother of the Church == |
|||
{{See also|Mariology of the popes}} |
|||
At the beginning of [[Vatican II]], [[Pope John XXIII]] changed the original title of a proposed council schema "About the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God and Mother of the People" to "About the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of the Church".<ref>Leo Cardinal Scheffczyk, Vaticanum II, in Marienlexikon 568</ref> Some Council fathers opposed the new title, considering it too innovative. As the Council refused to discuss the Marian document and title, [[Pope Paul VI]] independently pronounced it at the closing of the third phase of the council.<ref>Leo Cardinal Scheffczyk, "Vaticanum II", in ''Marienlexikon'' 568</ref> As former archbishop of [[Milan]], he knew that his famous predecessor, Saint [[Ambrose of Milan]] (338 – 397), had used identical language, calling Mary ''Model of the Church'' in light of her faith, love and complete unity with Christ, and [[Mother of the Church]] because she gave birth to Christ.<ref>Ambrose of Milan, ''De inst. Virg 98'', PL 16, 328 and IV, 3,4,PL17,876</ref> |
|||
===Pope John Paul II=== |
|||
[[File:Ingres the virgin of the host.jpg|thumb|240px|''Virgin of the Host'', [[Dominique Ingres]], 1852]] |
|||
[[Pope Paul VI]], at the [[Second Vatican Council]], proclaimed the ancient title [[Mother of the Church]]. In 1987, [[Pope John Paul II]] repeated this title ''Mother of the Church'' in his encyclical ''[[Redemptoris Mater]]'' and at a general audience on September 17, 1997.<ref>[http://www.ewtn.com/library/papaldoc/jp2bvm63.htm Blessed Virgin Is Mother Of The Church]</ref> The encyclical is a long and eloquent summary of modern Mariology, making some novel points: According to John Paul, the Mother of the Redeemer, has a precise place in the plan of salvation: |
|||
:The Church teaches that Mary appeared on the horizon of salvation history before Christ.<ref>''Redemptoris Mater'', 3</ref> |
|||
:If the greeting and the name "full of grace" say all this, in the context of the angel's announcement they refer first of all to the election of Mary as Mother of the Son of God. But at the same time the "fullness of grace" indicates all the supernatural munificence from which Mary benefits by being chosen and destined to be the Mother of Christ. If this election is fundamental for the accomplishment of God's salvific designs for humanity, and if the eternal choice in Christ and the vocation to the dignity of adopted children is the destiny of everyone, then the election of Mary is wholly exceptional and unique. Hence also the singularity and uniqueness of her place in the mystery of Christ.<ref>Redemptoris Mater 9</ref> |
|||
:It is precisely in this ecclesial journey or pilgrimage through space and time, and even more through the history of souls, that Mary is present, as the one who is "blessed because she believed", as the one who advanced on the pilgrimage of faith, sharing unlike any other creature in the mystery of Christ.<ref>Redemptoris Mater 25</ref> |
|||
In his [[Angelus]] address in September 1985 Pope [[John Paul II]] coined the term ''The [[Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary]]'', and in 1986 addressed the international conference on that topic held at [[Fátima, Portugal]].<ref name="vatican.va"/><ref name="christendom-awake.org"/><ref name="Mary 1986"/> |
|||
=== Pope Benedict XVI=== |
|||
[[Pope Benedict XVI]] addresses the issue of why Mariology is related to ecclesiology. On first sight, he argues it may seem accidental, that the Council moved Mariology into ecclesiology. This relation helps to understand what "Church" really is. The theologian [[Hugo Rahner]] showed that Mariology was originally ecclesiology. The Church is like Mary.<ref name="Joseph Kardinal Ratzinger 2002">Joseph Kardinal Ratzinger: Weggemeinschaft des Glaubens. Kirche als Communio. Festgabe zum 75. Geburtstag, hg. vom Schülerkreis, Augsburg 2002)</ref> |
|||
The Church is virgin and mother, she is immaculate and carries the burdens of history. She suffers and she is assumed into heaven. Slowly she learnes, that Mary is her mirror, that she is a person in Mary. Mary on the other hand is not an isolated individual, who rests in herself. She is carrying the mystery of the Church.<ref name="Joseph Kardinal Ratzinger 2002"/> |
|||
Pope Benedict XVI lamented that this unity of Church and Mary was overshadowed in later centuries, which overburdened Mary with privileges and removed her into a far away distance. Both Mariology and ecclesiology suffered under this. A Marian view of the Church and an ecclesiological view of Mary in salvation history lead directly to Christ. It brings to light what is meant by holiness and by ''God being human''.<ref name="Joseph Kardinal Ratzinger 2002"/> |
|||
{{Marian prayers}} |
{{Marian prayers}} |
||
While [[Eastern Catholic]]s respect papal authority, and largely hold the same theological beliefs as Roman Catholics, Eastern theology differs on specific Marian beliefs. Furthermore, much of the literature and publications on Mariology and centers for its study have been related to the Church of Rome. |
|||
== Eastern Catholic differences == |
|||
While [[Eastern Catholic]]s respect papal authority, and largely hold the same theological beliefs as Roman Catholics, Eastern theology differs on specific Marian beliefs. Furthermore, much of the literature and publications on Mariology and centers for its study have been related to the Church of Rome. |
|||
=== Assumption of Mary === |
=== Assumption of Mary === |
||
Line 264: | Line 243: | ||
==Centers for Mariological studies== |
==Centers for Mariological studies== |
||
The formal study of Mariology within the circles associated with the [[Holy See]] took a major step forward between the [[Holy Year]] 1950 and 1958 based on the actions of [[Pope Pius XII]], who authorized institutions for increased academic research into the veneration of the [[BVM(RC)|Blessed Virgin Mary]]. |
The formal study of Mariology within the circles associated with the [[Holy See]] took a major step forward between the [[Holy Year]] 1950 and 1958 based on the actions of [[Pope Pius XII]], who authorized institutions for increased academic research into the veneration of the [[BVM(RC)|Blessed Virgin Mary]]. |
||
* [http://accademiamariana.org/ Pontifical Marian International Academy] The PAMI is an international pontifical organization connecting all Promoters of Mariology, Catholics, Orthodox, Protestants and Muslim. John XXIII with the Apostolic Letter Maiora in Dies defined the purpose of the PAMI: to promote and animate studies of Mariology through International Mariological Marian Congresses and other academic meetings and to see to the publication of their studies. The PAMI has the task of coordinating the other Marian Academies and Societies that exist all over the world and to exercise vigilance against any Marian excess or minimalism. For this reason the Pope determined that in the Academy there be a Council that assures the organization of Congresses and the coordination of the Mariological Societies, Promoters and Teachers of Mariology. |
* [http://accademiamariana.org/ Pontifical Marian International Academy] The PAMI is an international pontifical organization connecting all Promoters of Mariology, Catholics, Orthodox, Protestants and Muslim. John XXIII with the Apostolic Letter Maiora in Dies defined the purpose of the PAMI: to promote and animate studies of Mariology through International Mariological Marian Congresses and other academic meetings and to see to the publication of their studies. The PAMI has the task of coordinating the other Marian Academies and Societies that exist all over the world and to exercise vigilance against any Marian excess or minimalism. For this reason the Pope determined that in the Academy there be a Council that assures the organization of Congresses and the coordination of the Mariological Societies, Promoters and Teachers of Mariology. |
||
* ''Academia Mariana Salesiana'' - He granted the foundation of the Academia Mariana Salesiana, which is a part of a papal university. The Academy supports Salesian studies to further the veneration of the Blessed Virgin in the tradition of Saint [[John Bosco]].<ref name="Bäumer, Marienlexikon, 534">Bäumer, Marienlexikon, 534</ref> |
* ''Academia Mariana Salesiana'' - He granted the foundation of the Academia Mariana Salesiana, which is a part of a papal university. The Academy supports Salesian studies to further the veneration of the Blessed Virgin in the tradition of Saint [[John Bosco]].<ref name="Bäumer, Marienlexikon, 534">Bäumer, Marienlexikon, 534</ref> |
||
* ''Centro Mariano Montfortano''- Also in 1950, the Centro Mariano Montfortano was moved from [[Bergamo]] to Rome. The Centro promulgates the teachings of Saint [[Louis de Montfort]], who was earlier canonized by Pius XII. It publishes the monthly ''Madre e Regina'', which promulgates the Marian orientation of Montfort.<ref name="Bäumer, Marienlexikon, 535">Bäumer, Marienlexikon, 535</ref> |
* ''Centro Mariano Montfortano''- Also in 1950, the Centro Mariano Montfortano was moved from [[Bergamo]] to Rome. The Centro promulgates the teachings of Saint [[Louis de Montfort]], who was earlier canonized by Pius XII. It publishes the monthly ''Madre e Regina'', which promulgates the Marian orientation of Montfort.<ref name="Bäumer, Marienlexikon, 535">Bäumer, Marienlexikon, 535</ref> |
||
Line 275: | Line 254: | ||
==Further reading== |
==Further reading== |
||
*{{ |
*{{cite book |title=Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons|last=Burke|first=Raymond L.|authorlink=Raymond Leo Burke|coauthors=et al.|year=2008|publisher= Queenship Pub. Co|location=Goleta, California|isbn=9781579183554|oclc=225875371}} |
||
*{{ |
*{{cite book |title=The Mystery of Mary|series=Hillenbrand Books studies series|last=Haffner|first=Paul|year=2004|publisher=Gracewing Press|location=Leominster, Herefordshire|isbn=0852446500|oclc=58964281}} |
||
*{{ |
*{{cite book |title=Introduction to Mary: The Heart of Marian Doctrine and Devotion|last=Miravalle|first=Mark I.|authorlink= Mark Miravalle|year=1993|publisher=Queenship Pub. Co|location=Santa Barbara, California|isbn=9781882972067|oclc=28849399}} |
||
*{{ |
*{{cite book |title=Mariology; A Dogmatic Treatise on the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God|last=Pohle|first=Joseph|editor=Preuss, Arthur|year=1948|origyear=1914|publisher=Herder Book|location=St. Louis, Mo|oclc= 1453529|url=http://www.archive.org/details/mariologydogmati00pohluoft}} |
||
*{{ |
*{{cite book |title=The Everything Mary Book|last=Schroedel|first=Jenny|coauthors=Schroedel, John|year=2006|publisher=Adams Media|location=Avon, Mass|isbn=1593377134|series=Everything profiles series|oclc=70167611}} |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Line 295: | Line 274: | ||
==References== |
==References== |
||
* Saint [[Louis de Montfort]] ''True Devotion to Mary'' ISBN 1593304706, also available as online text [http://www.catholictreasury.info/TrueDevotion/Default.htm] |
* Saint [[Louis de Montfort]] ''True Devotion to Mary'' ISBN 1593304706, also available as online text [http://www.catholictreasury.info/TrueDevotion/Default.htm] |
||
* Luigi Gambero, 1999, ''Mary and the Fathers of the Church'', Ignatius Press ISBN 0898706866 |
* Luigi Gambero, 1999, ''Mary and the Fathers of the Church'', Ignatius Press ISBN 0898706866 |
||
* Michael Schmaus, Mariologie, Katholische Dogmatik, München Vol V, 1955 |
* Michael Schmaus, Mariologie, Katholische Dogmatik, München Vol V, 1955 |
||
* K Algermissen, Boes, Egelhard, Feckes, Michael Schmaus, Lexikon der Marienkunde, Verlag Friedrich Pustet, Regensburg, 1967 |
* K Algermissen, Boes, Egelhard, Feckes, Michael Schmaus, Lexikon der Marienkunde, Verlag Friedrich Pustet, Regensburg, 1967 |
||
*Remigius |
*Remigius Bäumer, [[Leo Scheffczyk]] (Hrsg.) Marienlexikon Gesamtausgabe, Institutum Marianum Regensburg, 1994, ISBN 3-88096-891-8 (cit. Bäumer) |
||
* Stefano De Fiores, (Marianum) ''Maria, sintesi di valori. Storia culturale di mariologia.'' Cinisello Balsamo 2005; |
* Stefano De Fiores, (Marianum) ''Maria, sintesi di valori. Storia culturale di mariologia.'' Cinisello Balsamo 2005; |
||
* Stefano de Fiores, (Marianum), ''Maria. Nuovissimo dizionario.'' 2 Vols. Bologna 2006; |
* Stefano de Fiores, (Marianum), ''Maria. Nuovissimo dizionario.'' 2 Vols. Bologna 2006; |
||
* [[Mariology Society of America]] [http://mariologicalsociety.com] |
* [[Mariology Society of America]] [http://mariologicalsociety.com] |
||
* [[Acta Apostolicae Sedis]], referenced as AAS by year. |
* [[Acta Apostolicae Sedis]], referenced as AAS by year. |
||
* [[Pope Pius IX]], Apostolic Constitution |
* [[Pope Pius IX]], Apostolic Constitution |
||
** [http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_pi09id.htm Apostolic Constitution '''''Ineffabilis Deus'''''] |
** [http://www.newadvent.org/library/docs_pi09id.htm Apostolic Constitution '''''Ineffabilis Deus'''''] |
||
* [[Pope Pius XII]], encyclicals and bulls |
* [[Pope Pius XII]], encyclicals and bulls |
||
** [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_08091953_fulgens-corona_en.html Encyclical '''''Fulgens Corona''''' on the Vatican website] |
** [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_08091953_fulgens-corona_en.html Encyclical '''''Fulgens Corona''''' on the Vatican website] |
||
** [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_11101954_ad-caeli-reginam_en.html Encyclical '''''Ad Caeli Reginam''''' on the Vatican website] |
** [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_11101954_ad-caeli-reginam_en.html Encyclical '''''Ad Caeli Reginam''''' on the Vatican website] |
||
** [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_29061943_mystici-corporis-christi_en.html Encyclical '''''Mystici Corporis Christi''''' on the Vatican website] |
** [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_29061943_mystici-corporis-christi_en.html Encyclical '''''Mystici Corporis Christi''''' on the Vatican website] |
||
** [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus_en.html Apostolic Constitution '''''Munificentissimus Deus''''' on the Vatican Website] |
** [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/apost_constitutions/documents/hf_p-xii_apc_19501101_munificentissimus-deus_en.html Apostolic Constitution '''''Munificentissimus Deus''''' on the Vatican Website] |
||
* [[Pope John Paul II]], encyclical, apostolic letters and addresses |
* [[Pope John Paul II]], encyclical, apostolic letters and addresses |
||
** [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031987_redemptoris-mater_en.html Encyclical '''''Redemptoris Mater''''' on the Vatican website] |
** [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031987_redemptoris-mater_en.html Encyclical '''''Redemptoris Mater''''' on the Vatican website] |
||
** [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_20021016_rosarium-virginis-mariae_en.html Apostolic Letter '''''Rosarium Virginis Mariae''''' on the Vatican Website] |
** [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_20021016_rosarium-virginis-mariae_en.html Apostolic Letter '''''Rosarium Virginis Mariae''''' on the Vatican Website] |
||
Line 334: | Line 313: | ||
[[pl:Mariologia]] |
[[pl:Mariologia]] |
||
[[pt:Mariologia]] |
[[pt:Mariologia]] |
||
[[pt:Dogmas e doutrinas marianas da Igreja Católica]] |
|||
[[ru:Мариология]] |
|||
[[ru:??????????]] |
|||
[[sk:Mariológia]] |
[[sk:Mariológia]] |
||
[[fi:Mariologia]] |
[[fi:Mariologia]] |
Revision as of 14:11, 30 November 2010
Part of a series on the |
Mariology of the Catholic Church |
---|
Catholicism portal |
Roman Catholic Mariology is theology concerned with the Virgin Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ and developed by the Catholic Church. "The Blessed Virgin, because she is the Mother of God, is believed to hold a certain infinite dignity from the infinite good which is God."[1][2] Theologically, Roman Catholic Mariology deals with not only her life but also with veneration of her in daily life, prayer, and art (where she has been a favorite topic), music, and architecture; in modern and ancient Christianity throughout the ages.[3][4][5]
The development of Roman Catholic Mariology is ongoing. It continues to be shaped not only by papal encyclicals but also by the interplay of forces ranging from sensus fidelium, to the writings of the saints, to the construction of major Marian churches at the sites of Marian apparitions. In some cases, sensus fidelium has influenced Marian papal decisions, providing Mariology with a "theology of the people" component that distinguishes it from other parts of formal theology. In terms of popular following, membership in Roman Catholic Marian Movements and Societies has grown significantly in the 20th century. This has continued to be matched by support from the Holy See, with Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict XVI) stating: "It is necessary to go back to Mary, if we want to return to the truth about Jesus Christ".[6]
The ongoing development of Mariology continued in the 20th century, e.g. in his Angelus address in September 1985 Pope John Paul II coined the term The Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary, and in 1986 addressed the international conference on that topic held at Fátima, Portugal.[7][8][9]
Mariology and Christology
In Roman Catholicism, Mariology is a logical and necessary consequence of Christology: Jesus and Mary are son and mother, redeemer and redeemed.[10] Mariology is Christology developed to its full potential.[11] In Catholic theology, Mary and her son Jesus are very close but not identical. Therefore, Marian teaching, while contributing to the teaching of Christ, is also a separate discipline, called Mariology. The figure of Mary contributes to a fuller understanding of who Christ is and what he did. In the Roman Catholic view, a Christology without Mary is incomplete because it is not based on the total revelation of the Bible.[12]
Early Christians and numerous saints focused on this parallel interpretation. Popes highlighted the inner link between Marian dogmas and the full acceptance of christological dogma.[14] The Church is the people of God as she is the Body of Christ.[15] The Church lives in its relation to Christ. Being the Body of Christ, the Church has also a relation to his mother, which is the subject of Catholic Mariology. She is seen as the original image of the Church, or, as Vatican II states, Mother of the Church.[16]
In his 1946 publication Compendium Mariologiae, respected Mariologist Gabriel Roschini explained that Mary did not only participate in the birth of the physical Jesus but also, with conception, she entered with him into a spiritual union. The divine salvation plan, being not only material, includes a permanent spiritual unity with Christ. Most Mariologists agree with this position.[17] This echoed the sentiments of Pope Saint Pius X who in Ad Diem Illum stated: "there is no more direct road than by Mary for uniting all mankind in Christ."[18]
Mariology is ongoing. It includes dogmas, traditions, confirmed and hypothetical theological positions on Mary, contemporary as well as historical. Mariology is not simply a theological field studied by a few scholars, but a devotional concept embraced by millions of Catholics who venerate the Blessed Virgin Mary. As discussed below, it differs from other parts of theology in that its progress has quite often been driven from the ground up, from the masses of believers, and at times from religious experiences of young and simple children on remote hilltops, which have then influenced the higher levels of the Holy See in Rome via sensus fidei.
Marian doctrines of the Catholic Church, including the four dogmas mentioned below, are the central part of Mariology consisting of confirmed teachings and doctrines regarding Mary's life and role, but excluding the overall perspectives, the controversies and the cultural aspects of Marian devotion. Mariology is both part of abstract doctrine and an important part of church life: Marian prayers, pilgrimages to Marian shrines, Marian devotions during the months of May and October, Marian apparitions, Marian titles, and Marian Feast days are detailed in Blessed Virgin Mary. Therefore, this article on Roman Catholic Mariology presents an overview of the major issues, developments and controversies of the ecclesiogical movement.
History and development
The history of Mariology goes back to the first century. Early Christians focused their piety at first more upon the martyrs around them. Following that, they saw in Mary a bridge between the old and the new.[19] The earliest recorded prayer to Mary, the sub tuum praesidium, is dated in its earliest form to around the year 250.
In the fifth century, the Third Ecumenical Council declared Mary as Theotokos (God-bearer). Churches dedicated to Mary were constructed across the Christian world, among the most famous being Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome. Teaching of the Assumption of Mary became widespread across the Christian world. The Middle Ages saw growth and development for Mariology and brought major champions of Marian devotion to the fore, including Ephraim the Syrian, John Damascene and Bernard of Clairvaux. Prayers to Mary included the Ave Maria, and chants such as Ave Maris Stella and the Salve Regina emerged and became staples of monastic plainsong. Devotional practices grew in number.
The Renaissance period witnessed a dramatic growth in Marian art and masterpieces by Boticelli, Leonardo da Vinci and Raphael were produced. In the 16th century, the Council of Trent confirmed the Catholic tradition of paintings and artworks in churches. This resulted in a great development of Marian art and Mariology during the Baroque Period. During the Reformation, the Catholic Church defended its Mariology against Protestant views. With the victory at Battle of Lepanto (1571) accredited to her, it "signified the beginning of a strong resurgence of Marian devotions."[20] The baroque literature on Mary experienced unforeseen growth. More than 500 pages of Mariological writings were published during the 17th century alone.[21]
Mariology in the 19th century was dominated by discussions about the Immaculate Conception and in 1854, Pope Pius IX proclaimed it a dogma.[22] Mariology in the 20th century was dominated by a genuine Marian enthusiasm. Pope Pius XII issued the Dogma of the Assumption and the Second Vatican Council declared Mary to be the Mother of the Church.[23]
Views of the saints
Roman Catholic Mariology has relied on the writings of numerous saints throughout history who have attested to the central role of Mary in God's plan of salvation.
Saint Irenaeus of Lyons (circa 140-202) was perhaps the earliest of the Church Fathers to develop a thorough Mariology and he set out a forthright account of Mary's role in the "economy of salvation".[24][25] This view influenced Ambrose of Milan whose powerful Mariology influenced contemporary Popes such as Pope Damasus and Siricius and later, Pope Leo the Great. His student Augustine and the Council of Ephesus were equally under his influence.[26][27][28] Augustine argued that because of a woman, the whole human race was saved.[29]
In his encyclical Doctor Mellifluus on Saint Bernhard of Clairvaux, Pope Pius XII quoted three central elements of Berhard's Mariology: How he explained the virginity of Mary, the "Star of the Sea"; how the faithful should pray on the Virgin Mary; and, how Bernhard relied on the Virgin Mary as mediatrix.
Saint Alphonsus Liguori (1696–1787), a Doctor of the Church, was an effective defender of Mariology against the ideas of Jansenism. He wrote The Glories of Mary to present a basis for Mariology, derived from Scripture and the works of the Church Fathers. He greatly influenced Catholic Mariology during the Enlightenment period. His Marian enthusiasm contrasted with what some believers considered the colder rationalism of the Enlightenment. Mainly pastoral in nature, his Mariology rediscovered, integrated and defended the Mariology of Augustine, Ambrose and other fathers. It represented an intellectual defence of Mariology in the eighteenth century.[30]
Saint Louis de Montfort's highly influential True Devotion to Mary synthesized many of the earlier saints' writings and teachings on Mary. De Montfort's approach of "total consecration to Jesus Christ through Mary" had a strong impact on Marian devotion both in popular piety and in the spirituality of religious orders. One of his well-known followers was Pope John Paul II of the 20th century. According to his Apostolic Letter Rosarium Virginis Mariae, the pontiff's personal motto Totus Tuus (Totally yours) was inspired by St. Louis' doctrine on the excellence of Marian devotion and total consecration.
Dogmatic teachings
Marian Roman Catholic dogmas have two functions: they present infallible Church teachings about Mary and her relation to Jesus Christ, and they praise Mary and, through Mary, God's deed on Mary. All Marian dogmas teach about her divine son and highlight the divine nature of Jesus Christ.
De Fide Definita or De Fide Credenda doctrines have the highest degree of dogmatic certainty. These doctrines come in several forms, namely teachings which have been specifically defined as Revealed by an extraordinary definition by a Pope or Ecumenical council, or those teachings infallibly taught to be Revealed by the ordinary universal Magisterium. As in the case of the Immaculate Conception or the Assumption, these doctrines were held by the Church prior to the date of official definition, but open for discussion. The date of definition must be accepted by all faithful members of the Catholic Church as contained specifically in the Deposit of Faith and owed supernatural faith in itself (de fide credenda)
There are four Marian dogmas among a large number of other teachings about the Blessed Virgin:[31]
Name | First Magisterial Definition | Dogma content |
---|---|---|
Perpetual virginity | Baptismal symbols since Third Century | 'Perpetual virginity of Mary', means that Mary was a virgin before, during and after giving birth |
Mother of God | Council of Ephesus (431) | Mary is truly the mother of God, because of her unity with Christ, the Son of God |
Immaculate Conception | Pope Pius IX (1854) | Mary, at her conception, was preserved immaculate from Original Sin |
Assumption into heaven | Pope Pius XII (1950) | Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory |
For a discussion of a proposed fifth Marian dogma, see the section on Mediatrix and Co-Redemptrix below.
Perpetual virginity of Mary
'Perpetual virginity of Mary', means that Mary was a virgin before, during and after giving birth. (De fide) This oldest Marian Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox doctrine affirms Mary's "real and perpetual virginity even in the act of giving birth to the Son of God made Man."[32] Thus, by the teaching of this dogma, the faithful believe that Mary was ever-Virgin (Greek ???????????) for the remainder of her life, making Jesus her only biological son, whose conception and birth are miraculous.
In the year 107, Ignatius of Antioch described the virginity of Mary as "hidden from the prince of this world ... loudly proclaimed, but wrought in the silence of God."The affirmation of the doctrine of Mary's virginity before, during and after the birth of Jesus was the principal aim of the early second century work, the Protoevangelium of James (c. 120-150). The work, concerned with the character and purity of Mary, claims that Joseph had children from a marriage previous to Mary. However, the text does not explicitly assert the doctrine of perpetual virginity. The earliest such surviving reference is Origen's Commentary on Matthew, where he cites the Protoevangelium in support.
By the fourth century, the doctrine was generally accepted. Athanasius described Mary as "Ever-Virgin", Orations against the Arians, as did Epiphanius in his Medicine Chest Against All Heresies. Hilary argued in favor of the doctrine in his Commentary on Matthew and to this may be added Didymus (The Trinity) Ambrose of Milan, Jerome, in Against Helvetius, Siricius' and others.
Further important statements of the belief include the Lateran Synod of 649, Thomas Aquinas's teaching (Summa Theologiae III.28.2) that Mary gave birth painlessly in miraculous fashion without opening of the womb and without injury to the hymen, and Pope Paul IV's Cum quorundam of 7 August 1555 at the Council of Trent. Before this last extraordinary papal/concilliar definition, really an afterthought, the teaching can be considered to have been always taught infallibly by the ordinary and universal magisterium as a truth contained in the deposit of faith, as opposed to by any specific extraordinary definition.
Virginity before birth
Mary conceived by the Holy Spirit without participation of any man. (De fide). Non-Christians questioned this belief of the early Church [33] Jews and Christians differed on the prediction in Isaiah 7,14 [34] Along with other Christian groups the Catholic Church continues to teach today, that Mary bore her son Jesus while still a virgin. From the first formulations of her faith, the Church has confessed that Jesus was conceived solely by the power of the Holy Spirit in the womb of the Virgin Mary, affirming also the corporeal aspect of this event: Jesus was conceived "by the Holy Spirit without human seed".[35] The Fathers see in the virginal conception the sign that it truly was the Son of God who came in a humanity like our own. Catechism of the Catholic Church,[36][37]
Virginity during birth
Mary gave birth without losing her corporal virginity (De fide). Her corporal integrity was not affected by giving birth. The Church does not teach how this occurred physically, but insists that virginity during child birth is different from virginity of conception. Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis "Within her virginal womb she brought into life Christ our Lord in a marvellous birth." [38] indicating the miraculous nature of the Virgin birth. Numerous early Church writers used analogies to explain this mystery, like Christ leaving the sealed tomb on Easter Sunday, or, Christ walking through closed doors, or, light and sun penetrating through glass windows.[39]
Virginity after birth
Mary remained a virgin after giving birth (De fide). This belief of the Church was questioned in its early years [40] Today most Protestants disagree with this teaching, although Martin Luther and his contemporaries believed in the ever Virgin Mary [41] The scriptures say little about this, mentioning the brothers of Jesus, but never "sons of Mary," suggesting to the patristical writers a broader family relationship.[42]
Mother of God
Mary is truly the mother of God (De fide). After Church fathers found common ground on Mary's virginity before, during and after giving birth, this was the first specifically Marian doctrine to be formally defined by the Church. The definition Mother of God (in Greek:Theotokos,) was formally affirmed at the Third Ecumenical Council held at Ephesus in 431. The competing view, advocated by Patriarch Nestorius of Constantinople, was that Mary should be called Christotokos, meaning "Birth-giver of Christ," to restrict her role to the mother of Christ's humanity only and not his divine nature.
Nestorius' opponents, led by Cyril of Alexandria, viewed this as dividing Jesus into two distinct persons, the human who was Son of Mary, and the divine who was not. To them, this was unacceptable since by destroying the perfect union of the divine and human natures in Christ, it sabotaged the fullness of the Incarnation and, by extension, the salvation of humanity. The council accepted Cyril's reasoning, affirmed the title Theotokos for Mary, and anathematised Nestorius' view as heresy. (See Nestorianism)
In letters to Nestorius which were afterwards included among the council documents, Cyril explained his doctrine. He noted that "the holy fathers... have ventured to call the holy Virgin [T]heotokos, not as though the nature of the [W]ord or his divinity received the beginning of their existence from the holy Virgin, but because from her was born his holy body, rationally endowed with a soul, with which [body] the [W]ord was united according to the hypostasis, and is said to have been begotten according to the flesh" (Cyril's second letter to Nestorius).
Explaining his rejection of Nestorius' preferred title for Mary (Christotokos, Mother of Christ,) Cyril wrote: "Confessing the Word to be united with the flesh according to the hypostasis, we worship one Son and Lord, Jesus Christ. We do not divide him into parts and separate man and God as though they were united with each other [only] through a unity of dignity and authority... nor do we name separately Christ the Word from God, and in similar fashion, separately, another Christ from the woman, but we know only one Christ, the Word from God the Father with his own flesh... But we do not say that the Word from God dwelt as in an ordinary human born of the holy virgin... we understand that, when he became flesh, not in the same way as he is said to dwell among the saints do we distinguish the manner of the indwelling; but he was united by nature and not turned into flesh... There is, then, one Christ and Son and Lord, not with the sort of conjunction that a human being might have with God as in a unity of dignity or authority; for equality of honor does not unite natures. For Peter and John were equal to each other in honor, both of them being apostles and holy disciples, but the two were not one. Nor do we understand the manner of conjunction to be one of juxtaposition, for this is insufficient in regard to natural union.... Rather we reject the term 'conjunction' as being inadequate to express the union... [T]he holy virgin gave birth in the flesh to God united with the flesh according to hypostasis, for that reason we call her Theotokos... If anyone does not confess that Emmanuel is, in truth, God, and therefore that the holy virgin is Theotokos (for she bore in a fleshly manner the Word from God become flesh), let him be anathema." (Cyril's third letter to Nestorius)
Immaculate Conception of Mary
Mary was conceived without original sin (De fide). The Immaculate Conception is, according to Roman Catholic dogma, the conception of Mary, the mother of Jesus without any stain of original sin, in her mother's womb: the dogma thus says that, from the first moment of her existence, she was preserved by God from the lack of sanctifying grace that afflicts mankind, and that she was instead filled with divine grace. It is further believed that she lived a life completely free from sin. Her immaculate conception in the womb of her mother, by normal sexual intercourse (Christian tradition identifies her parents as Sts. Joachim and Anne), should not be confused with the doctrine of the virginal conception of her son Jesus.
The feast of the Immaculate Conception, celebrated on December 8, was established in 1476 by Pope Sixtus IV. He did not extraordinarily define it as a dogma at this time, but this does not mean Catholics were free to believe in it or not.[43] The Immaculate Conception was solemnly defined as a dogma by Pope Pius IX in his constitution Ineffabilis Deus, on December 8, 1854 as a truth not merely implied by the deposit of faith and discerned by the Church under the infallible guidance of the Holy Spirit (de fide tenenda), but as specifically and explicitly contained as an object of supernatural faith in the Public Revelation of the Deposit of Faith (de fide credenda).
The Catholic Church believes the dogma is supported by Scripture (e.g. Mary's being greeted by Angel Gabriel as "full of grace" or "highly favoured"), as well as either directly or indirectly by the writings of many of the Church Fathers, and often calls Mary the Blessed Virgin (Luke 1:48). Catholic theology maintains that, since Jesus became incarnate of the Virgin Mary, it was fitting that she be completely free of sin for expressing her fiat. (Ott, Fund., Bk 3, Pt. 3, Ch. 2, §3.1.e).
It seemed to Pius XII that the Blessed Virgin Mary herself wished to confirm by some special sign the definition, because, less than four years later, in a French town
- The Virgin Mother, youthful and benign in appearance, clothed in a shining white garment, covered with a white mantle and girded with a hanging blue cord, showed herself to a simple and innocent girl at the grotto of Massabielle. And to this same girl, who earnestly inquired the name of her, with whose vision she was favoured, she replied with her eyes raised to heaven and sweetly: "I am the Immaculate Conception." [44]
For the whole Roman Catholic Church the dogma of the Immaculate Conception gained additional significance from these apparitions of Our Lady of Lourdes in 1858. In Lourdes a 14-year-old girl, Bernadette Soubirous
In the Roman Catholic Church, the Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception is a Holy Day of Obligation, except where conferences of bishops have decided, with the approval of the Holy See, not to maintain it as such. It is a public holiday in some countries where Roman Catholicism is predominant e.g. Italy. In the Philippines, although this is not a public holiday, the predominance of Catholic Schools make it almost a holiday.
Assumption of Mary
Mary was assumed into heaven with body and soul (de fide). Mary, the ever virgin, mother of God was free of original sin. The Immaculate Conception is one basis for the 1950 dogma. Another was the century old Church-wide veneration of the Virgin Mary as being assumed into heaven, which Pope Pius XII referred to in Deiparae Virginis Mariae and reported in Munificentissimus Deus.[45] Although the Assumption was only recently defined as dogma, accounts of the bodily assumption of Mary into heaven have circulated since at least the 5th century. The Catholic Church itself interprets chapter 12 of the Book of Revelation as referring to it. The earliest assumption narrative is the so-called Liber Requiei Mariae (The Book of Mary's Repose), a narrative which survives intact only in an Ethiopic translation. (Stephen J. Shoemaker, Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary's Dormition and Assumption] Oxford University Press, 2002, 2006). Probably composed by the 4th century, this early Christian apocryphal narrative may be as early as the 3rd century. Also quite early are the very different traditions of the "Six Books" Dormition narratives. The earliest versions of this apocryphon are preserved by several Syriac manuscripts of the 5th and 6th centuries, although the text itself probably belongs to the 4th century. Later apocrypha based on these earlier texts include the De Obitu S. Dominae, attributed to St. John, a work probably from around the turn of the 6th century that is a summary of the "Six Books" narrative. The story also appears in De Transitu Virginis, a late 5th century work ascribed to St. Melito of Sardis that presents a theologically redacted summary of the traditions in the Liber Requiei Mariae. The Transitus Mariae tells the story of the apostles being transported by white clouds to the death-bed of Mary, each from the town where he was preaching at the hour. The Decretum Gelasianum in the 490s declared some transitus Mariae literature as apocryphal.
An Armenian letter attributed to Dionysus the Areopagite also mentions the event, although this is a much later work, written sometime after the 6th century. Other saints also describe it, notably St Gregory of Tours, St John Damascene, and St Modestus of Jerusalem.
Theological debate about the Assumption continued until 1950 when, in the Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deus, it was defined as definitive doctrine by Pope Pius XII:
- We pronounce, declare, and define it to be a divinely revealed dogma: that the Immaculate Mother of God, the ever Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into heavenly glory."[46][47]
Since the 1870 solemn declaration of Papal Infallibility by Vatican I in 1870, this declaration by Pius XII has been the only ex cathedra use of Papal Infallibility. While Pope Pius XII deliberately left open the question of whether Mary died before her Assumption, the more common teaching of the early Fathers is that she did.[48][49]
Other Marian doctrines
The Catholic Church holds many other teachings about the Virgin Mary, many of which are just as relevant as the defined teachings above. Some flow logically from the formal dogmas of virginity, sinlessness, and immaculate conception. Others are century old teachings, cults and celebrations, which, in the Catholic view, under the infallible guidance of the Holy Spirit, are an integral part of the deposit of Faith handed down by the Church.
Mary is Mother of all Christians
The Catholic Church teaches that the Virgin Mary is mother of the Church and of all its members, namely all Christians. The Catechism of the Catholic Church states:
- "The Virgin Mary . . . is acknowledged and honoured as being truly the Mother of God and of the redeemer.... She is 'clearly the mother of the members of Christ' . . . since she has by her charity joined in bringing about the birth of believers in the Church, who are members of its head." "Mary, Mother of Christ, Mother of the Church." [50]
In addition, Mary is seen as mother of Christians because Christians are said in scripture to become spiritually part of the body of Christ. Christians are adopted by Jesus as his "brothers". They therefore share with Him the Fatherhood of God and also the motherhood of Mary. Again, in the New Testament book of John [51] Jesus, from the cross gives the Apostle John to Mary as her son, and gives Mary to John as his mother. John here, as the sole remaining Apostle remaining steadfast with Jesus is taken to represent all loyal followers of Jesus from that time on.
The devotion to the Virgin Mary thus continues to be emphasized in Roman Catholic teachings. For instance, in his encyclical Rosarium Virginis Mariae, Pope John Paul II discussed how his own motto "Totus Tuus" was inspired by the writings of Saint Louis de Montfort on total consecration to the Virgin Mary, which he quoted:[52].
- Now, since Mary is of all creatures the one most conformed to Jesus Christ, it follows that among all devotions that which most consecrates and conforms a soul to our Lord is devotion to Mary, his Holy Mother, and that the more a soul is consecrated to her the more will it be consecrated to Jesus Christ."
In a separate address to the Montfortian Fathers, Pope John Paul II stated that reading Saint Louis de Montfort's work on Devotion to Mary had been a "decisive turning point" in his life[53]
Mary as Mediatrix
In Catholic teachings, Jesus Christ is the only mediator between God and man.[54] He alone reconciled through his death on the Cross creator and creation. But this does not exclude a secondary mediating role for Mary, preparatory, supportive, in the view of several prominent, but not all Catholics. The teaching that Mary intercedes for all believers and especially those who request her intercession through prayer has been held in the Church since early times, for example by Ephraim, the Syrian “after the mediater a mediatrix for the whole world [55] Intercession is something that may be done by all the heavenly saints, but Mary is seen as having the greatest intercessionary power. The earliest surviving recorded prayer to Mary is the Sub tuum praesidium, written in Greek [56].
Mary has increasingly been seen as a principal dispenser of God's graces and Advocate for the people of God and is mentioned as such in several official Church documents. Pope Pius IX used the title in Ineffabilis Deus. In the first of his so called Rosary encyclicals, Supremi Apostolatus (1883), Pope Leo XIII calls Our Lady the guardian of our peace and the dispensatrix of heavenly graces. The following year, 1884, his encyclical Superiore Anno speaks of the prayers presented to God through her whom He has chosen to be the dispenser of all heavenly graces. Pope Pius X employed this title in Ad Diem Illud in 1904, Pope Benedict XV introduced it into the Marian liturgy when he created the Marian feast of The Mary, Mediatrix of all Graces in 1921, In his 1954 encyclical Ad caeli reginam, Pope Pius XII calls Mary the Mediatrix of peace.[57] The theological discussion ongoing, neither Pius XII nor his successors moved to a closure of this issue.
Co-Redemptrix
Co-Redemptrix refers to the participation of Mary in the salvation process. Already, Irenaeus, the Church Father (Died 200), referred to Mary as "causa salutis" [cause of our salvation] given her "fiat[58] It is teaching, which has been considered since the 15th century [59] but never declared a dogma. The Roman Catholic view of Co-Redemptrix does not imply that Mary participates as equal part in the redemption of the human race, since Christ is the only redeemer [60] Mary herself needed redemption and was redeemed by Jesus Christ her son. Being redeemed by Christ, implies that she cannot be his equal part in the redemption process.[61]
Co-redemptrix refers to an indirect or unequal but important participation by Mary in the redemption process. She gave free consent to give life to the redeemer, to share his life, to suffer with him under the cross and to sacrifice him for the sake of the redemption of mankind. Co-redemption is not something new.
Papal teaching begin to mention this aspect in official Church documents during the pontificate of Pope Pius X [62] Pius X referred to it in his encyclical Ad Diem Illum.[63] Pope Benedict XV first described the term in his own right in his Apostolic Letter, Inter Soldalica, issued March 22, 1918.[64][64] Pope Pius XII repeated this argument with slightly different accents in his encyclical Mystici Corporis.[65] In the Papal bull Munificentissimus Deus on dogma of the assumption, Pope Pius declares that “the revered Mother of God, from all eternity joined in a hidden way with Jesus Christ in one and the same decree of predestination, immaculate in her conception, a most perfect virgin in her divine motherhood, as the noble associate of the divine Redeemer [66]
Queen of Heaven
The doctrine that the Virgin Mary has been crowned Queen of Heaven goes back to the early patristic writers of the Church such as] St. Gregory Nazianzen "the Mother of the King of the universe," and the "Virgin Mother who brought forth the King of the whole world," [67] Prudentius, the Mother marvels "that she has brought forth God as man, and even as Supreme King." [68] and, St. Ephrem, "Let Heaven sustain me in its embrace, because I am honored above it. For heaven was not Thy mother, but Thou hast made it Thy throne. How much more honorable and venerable than the throne of a king is her mother." [69] The Catholic Church often sees Mary as queen in heaven, bearing a crown of twelve stars in Revelation[70]
Many Popes have given tribute to it. Mary is the Queen of Heaven and Earth, (Pius IX), Queen and Ruler of the Universe (Leo XIII) and Queen of the World (Pius XII) [71] The theological and logical foundation of these titles rests in the dogma of Mary as the Mother of God. As mother of God, she participates in his salvation plan. The Catholic faith teaches that Mary, the Virgin Mother of God, reigns with a mother's solicitude over the entire world, just as she is crowned in heavenly blessedness with the glory of a Queen[72]:
- Certainly, in the full and strict meaning of the term, only Jesus Christ, the God-Man, is King; but Mary, too, as Mother of the divine Christ, as His associate in the redemption, in his struggle with His enemies and His final victory over them, has a share, though in a limited and analogous way, in His royal dignity. For from her union with Christ she attains a radiant eminence transcending that of any other creature; from her union with Christ she receives the royal right to dispose of the treasures of the Divine Redeemer's Kingdom; from her union with Christ finally is derived the inexhaustible efficacy of her maternal intercession before the Son and His Father.[73]
Reparations to the Virgin Mary
Roman Catholic teachings and traditions includes specific devotions as Acts of Reparation to the Virgin Mary for insults that she suffers. The Raccolta Catholic prayer book (approved by a Decree of 1854, and published by the Holy See in 1898) includes a number of such prayers.[74][75][76]
These devotions and prayers do not involve a petition for a living or deceased beneficiary, but aim to repair the sins of others against the Virgin Mary.
Mariology as theology of the people
Unlike Roman Catholic theology which originates from the upper levels of the Church in the writings of scholars and theologians, Mariology has often developed from the ground up by the tens of millions of Catholics with a special devotion to the Blessed Virgin. In several crucial cases, these devotions have not been started with decrees issued in Rome, but by religious experiences (and visions) of simple and modest individuals (in many cases children). Their recounting of their experiences in time created strong emotions among numerous Roman Catholics, who independently adopted practices and devotions. Their faith and beliefs influenced priests and the higher levels of the Roman Catholic hierarchy.
A good example is the case of Saint Juan Diego. As a young man in 1531, he reported an early morning vision of the Virgin Mary in which he was instructed to build an abbey on the Hill of Tepeyac in Mexico. The local prelate did not believe his account and asked for a miraculous sign. This was provided by an icon of Our Lady of Guadalupe permanently imprinted on the saint's cloak where he had gathered roses.
By all accounts, Juan Diego did not receive a lot of attention in Rome during the 1530s, since the Church was busy with the challenges of the Protestant Reformation of 1521 to 1579. Yet, Juan Diego's reported vision of the Virgin Mary was considered instrumental in the attraction of almost 8 million people to the ranks of Catholics in the Americas between 1532 and 1538. With tens of millions of followers, Juan Diego impacted Mariology in the Americas and beyond, and was eventually declared venerable in 1987, beatified in 1990, and canonized in 2002.
The spread of Marian devotions, such as the Holy Rosary via lay Catholic organizations, has also influenced Mariology. The 20th century witnessed significant growth in the number of volunteer-based lay Marian devotional organizations, such as free rosary distribution groups. An example is Our Lady's Rosary Makers, which was formed with a $25 donation for a typewriter in 1949. It now has thousands of volunteers who have distributed hundreds of millions of free rosaries to Catholic missions worldwide. The growth of Marian devotions builds sensus fidelium, which in time influences the direction of Mariology as a whole.
Influence of visions
Saint Juan Diego was not the only young person to report an early morning vision on a hilltop where a Lady appears and asks for a Church to be built on that hill. In 1858, Saint Bernadette Soubirous's reported vision of Our Lady of Lourdes was similar. Both saints reported a miraculous Lady on a hill who asked them to request that the local priests build a chapel at the site of the vision. Both visions included a reference to roses. Large churches were built at the sites: Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico, and Our Lady of Lourdes in France.
A simple, 14 year old peasant girl of no significant education, Bernadette Soubirous reported her vision of a woman in white, who said, Que soy L’Immaculado concepciou, I am the Immaculate Conception and asked that a church be built there. At first ridiculed, questioned, and belittled by Church officials and other contemporaries, Bernadette firmly but modestly insisted on her vision. Eventually the Church believed her and she was canonized by Pope Pius XI in 1933.[77] In time, many churches were built on that hilltop (one of them, the Basilica of St. Pius X can accommodate 25,000 people). Lourdes is now a major Marian pilgrimage site. Within France, only Paris has more hotels than Lourdes.
Three Portuguese children, Lucia dos Santos, Jacinta Marto, and Francisco Marto, were equally young and without much education when they reported the apparition of Our Lady of Fatima in 1917. The local administrator initially jailed the children and threatened that he would boil them one by one in a pot of oil. The children were consoled by the other inmates in the jail, and then led the inmates in praying the Rosary.[78]
With millions of followers and Roman Catholic believers, the reported visions at Fatima gathered respect. After a canonical enquiry, the visions of Fatima were officially declared "worthy of belief" in October 1930 by the Bishop of Leiria-Fatima.[79] Popes Pius XII, John XXIII, Paul VI and John Paul II voiced their acceptance of the supernatural origin of the Fatima events. John Paul II credited Our Lady of Fatima with saving his life following an assassination attempt on the Feast of Our Lady of Fatima, 1981. He donated the bullet that wounded him to the Roman Catholic sanctuary at Fátima, Portugal.
Mariologists refer to Saint Marguerite Marie Alacoque, as "living proof how Marian devotion is linked to 'Christology'" and the adoration of Jesus Christ.[80] She made a vow at age 14 to dedicate her life to the Virgin Mary. As a simple Marian nun, she was subjected to many trials to prove the genuineness of her vocation and her visions of Jesus and Mary relating to the Sacred Heart. She was initially rebuffed by her mother superior and was unable to convince theologians of the validity of her visions. A noted exception was Saint Claude de la Colombière, who supported her. The devotion to the Sacred Heart was officially recognized 75 years after Alacoque's death.[81] In his encyclical Miserentissimus Redemptor, Pope Pius XI stated that Jesus Christ had "manifested Himself" to Saint Margaret and referred to the conversation between Jesus and Saint Margaret several times.[82]
Mariette Beco was twelve years old when she reported Marian apparitions in 1933 in Banneux, Belgium. In this case, the Lady in White reportedly declared she was the Virgin of the Poor and said: "Believe in me and I will believe in you." In 1942, the Holy See permitted the local bishop to allow the veneration of the Virgin of the Poor.[83]
Impact on the Catholic Church
While these and many other persons all faced problems for an initial period, the Church, with some delay, listened to the Mariological faith, as an official Vatican website admitted in 2004. Thus, "The dogma of the Immaculate Conception was defined by Pius IX not so much because of proofs in Scripture or ancient tradition, but due to a profound sensus fidelium, a century-old sense of the faithful, and the Magisterium".[84]
The Vatican quotes in this context Fulgens Corona, where Pius XII supported such a faith:
- If the popular praises "of the Blessed Virgin Mary be given the careful consideration they deserve, who will dare to doubt that she, who was purer than the angels and at all times pure, was at any moment, even for the briefest instant, not free from every stain of sin?"[85]
In several Marian teachings, such as the Immaculate Conception, the "theology of the people", the profound and century-old sense of the faithful took precedence over academic theology.[84] Identical arguments were made for the dogma of the Assumption by Pope Pius XII.[86] To some non-Catholics and even to some theologically oriented Catholics, like Karl Rahner, this sensus fidei has some problems.[87]
Nevertheless, popular Mariology has been a major driving force in the past 150 years. It led to the two infallible, ex cathedra dogmas: Immaculate Conception (1854) and Assumption (1950). Since the 1870 solemn declaration of Papal Infallibility by Vatican I, the 1950 declaration by Pius XII has been the first and only ex cathedra use of papal infallibility. Thus while the dogmatic definitions of the Assumption, took place only in the 20th century, the sensus fidelium was already being shaped in the Middle Ages, and by 1530, Antonio da Correggio had completed his contract for the elaborate scene of the Assumption in the Cathedral of Palermo.[88]
The multitude of perspectives
Throughout the centuries, Catholics have viewed the Virgin Mary from a multitude of perspectives, at times derived from specific Marian attributes ranging from queenship to humility, and at times based on cultural preferences of events taking place at specific points in history.[89][90]
An example of the changing perspectives on the Virgin Mary based on specific spiritual views, and its adoption within a culture a world away is the transformation of the image of Mary from a Heavenly Queen to a mother of humility, and the construction of views to accommodate both perspectives. While depictions of the Virgin Mary as the Queen of Heaven or Coronation of the Virgin by artists such as Paolo Veneziano or Giuliano da Rimini were common in the early part of the 14th century, they did not fit with the virtue of humility which was a key tenet of the spirituality of Saint Francis of Assisi. The concept of the Virgin of humility was developed in the 14th century in order to accommodate Franciscan piety, by depicting the Madonna sitting on the ground, rather than a throne. It offered a view of the Virgin Mary (often barefoot) as a mother nursing a child, rather than a Queen in a coronation scene.[91][92][93]
As the Franciscans began to preach in China, the notion of the Virgin of humility resonated well with the Chinese, partly due to the cultural acceptance of humility as a virtue in China, and partly due to its similarity to the motherly, merciful figure of Kuanyin, which was much admired in south China.[94][95][96] However, by the middle of the 15th century, a dual view had emerged in Europe, as represented by Domenico di Bartolo's 1433 Madonna of humility which expressed the symbolic duality of her nature: an earthly barefoot woman, as well as a heavenly queen. Despite her low, sitting position, the depiction of star and the gems, as well as a halo, signify the regal status of the Virgin, as she is being attended to while she holds the Child Jesus.[97]
Saint Juan Diego's account of the appearance of the Virgin of Guadalupe to him in 1531 on Tepeyac Hill in Mexico provides another example of the cultural adaptation of the view of the Virgin Mary. Juan Diego did not describe the Virgin Mary as either European or Middle Eastern, but as a tanned Aztec princess who spoke in his local Nahuatl language, and not in Spanish. The image of the Virgin of Guadalupe that is highly venerated in Mexico has the appearance of a South American, rather than a European woman, and the clothing of the Virgin of Guadalupe has been identified as that of an Aztec princess. The Virgin of Guadalupe was a turning point in the conversion of South America to Catholicism, and is the primary view of Mary among millions of Catholics in Mexico in the 21st century.[98][99][100] Pope John Paul II reinforced the localization of this view by permitting local Aztec dances during the ceremony in which he declared Juan Diego a saint, spoke in Nahuatl as part of the ceremony, called Juan Diego "the talking eagle" and asked him to show "the way that leads to the Dark Virgin of Tepeyac".[99] [101][102]
The view of the Virgin Mary as a "miracle worker" has existed for centuries and is still held by many Catholics in the 21st century.[103][104] The legends of the miracles of the Maddona of Orsanmichele in Florence, Italy go back to the Renaissance.[105] The legends of miracles performed by the image of the Black Madonna of Cz?stochowa also go back for centuries, and it continues to be venerated today as the Patron of Poland.[106][107] Every year, millions of Catholic pilgrims visit the Basilica at Our Lady of Lourdes in search of miraculous cures.[108][109] Although millions of Catholics hope for miracles on their pilgrimages, the Vatican has generally been reluctant to approve of modern miracles, unless they have been subject to extensive analysis.[110]
Eastern Catholic differences
Part of a series on the |
Mariology of the Catholic Church |
---|
Catholicism portal |
While Eastern Catholics respect papal authority, and largely hold the same theological beliefs as Roman Catholics, Eastern theology differs on specific Marian beliefs. Furthermore, much of the literature and publications on Mariology and centers for its study have been related to the Church of Rome.
Assumption of Mary
The traditional Eastern expression of this doctrine is the Dormition of the Theotokos which emphasises her falling asleep to be later assumed into heaven. The differences in these observances is for some Eastern Catholics superficial.[111] However, Roman Catholics in general object to this doctrine.[112]
Immaculate Conception
The doctrine of the Immaculate Conception is a teaching of Eastern origin but expressed in the terminology of the Western Church.[113] Original Sin as defined by St. Augustine of Hippo is a Western concept, so its absence is not an Eastern expression. However, Eastern Catholics recognized from ancient times that Mary was preserved by God from sin. Eastern Catholics while not observing the Western feast, have no difficulty affirming it or even dedicating their churches to the Virgin Mary under this title.[114]
Centers for Mariological studies
The formal study of Mariology within the circles associated with the Holy See took a major step forward between the Holy Year 1950 and 1958 based on the actions of Pope Pius XII, who authorized institutions for increased academic research into the veneration of the Blessed Virgin Mary.
- Pontifical Marian International Academy The PAMI is an international pontifical organization connecting all Promoters of Mariology, Catholics, Orthodox, Protestants and Muslim. John XXIII with the Apostolic Letter Maiora in Dies defined the purpose of the PAMI: to promote and animate studies of Mariology through International Mariological Marian Congresses and other academic meetings and to see to the publication of their studies. The PAMI has the task of coordinating the other Marian Academies and Societies that exist all over the world and to exercise vigilance against any Marian excess or minimalism. For this reason the Pope determined that in the Academy there be a Council that assures the organization of Congresses and the coordination of the Mariological Societies, Promoters and Teachers of Mariology.
- Academia Mariana Salesiana - He granted the foundation of the Academia Mariana Salesiana, which is a part of a papal university. The Academy supports Salesian studies to further the veneration of the Blessed Virgin in the tradition of Saint John Bosco.[115]
- Centro Mariano Montfortano- Also in 1950, the Centro Mariano Montfortano was moved from Bergamo to Rome. The Centro promulgates the teachings of Saint Louis de Montfort, who was earlier canonized by Pius XII. It publishes the monthly Madre e Regina, which promulgates the Marian orientation of Montfort.[116]
- Marianum was created in 1950 and entrusted to the Order of Servites. It is authorized to grant all academic degrees, including a doctorate in theology. Since 1976, every two years the Marianum organizes international conferences to find modern formulations which approximate the mystery of Mary.[116]
- Collegamento Mariano Nazionale (1958)- the last Marian initiative of Pope Pius XII. It coordinates activities of Marian centres in Italy, and organizes Marian pilgrimages and Marian study weeks for priests. In addition it started Marian youth gatherings and publishes the journal Madonna.[115]
Of these organizations, the Marianum is the most active marilogical centre in Rome.[117] This Pontifical Catholic institute was founded by Father Gabriel Roschini (who directed it for several years) under the direction of Pope Pius XII in 1950. At the Marianum, one can get a Master's degree in Mariology (2-year academic program) and one can also get a doctorate in Mariology. This mariological facility has a library with more than 85,000 volumes on Mariology and a number of magazines and journals of theological and Mariological concern. Marianum is also the name of the prestigious journal of Marian theology, founded by Father Roschini in 1939.[116]
In 1975, the University of Dayton in Ohio formed the International Marian Research Institute in affiliation with the Marianum to offer a doctorate in sacred theology (S.T.D.) and a licentiate in sacred theology (S.T.L.).[118]
Further reading
- Burke, Raymond L. (2008). Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, Seminarians, and Consecrated Persons. Goleta, California: Queenship Pub. Co. ISBN 9781579183554. OCLC 225875371.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - Haffner, Paul (2004). The Mystery of Mary. Hillenbrand Books studies series. Leominster, Herefordshire: Gracewing Press. ISBN 0852446500. OCLC 58964281.
- Miravalle, Mark I. (1993). Introduction to Mary: The Heart of Marian Doctrine and Devotion. Santa Barbara, California: Queenship Pub. Co. ISBN 9781882972067. OCLC 28849399.
- Pohle, Joseph (1948) [1914]. Preuss, Arthur (ed.). Mariology; A Dogmatic Treatise on the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of God. St. Louis, Mo: Herder Book. OCLC 1453529.
- Schroedel, Jenny (2006). The Everything Mary Book. Everything profiles series. Avon, Mass: Adams Media. ISBN 1593377134. OCLC 70167611.
{{cite book}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)
See also
- Acts of Reparation to the Virgin Mary
- Anglican Marian theology
- Anglican Roman Catholic International Commission
- Islamic view of Virgin Mary
- Marian devotions
- Protestant views of Mary
- Josephology
Notes
- ^ (Cf. Summa Theologiae, I, Q, 25, Art 6 as 4um).
- ^ Msgr Joseph Pohle, 2009, Mariology Bibiolife ISBN 1110507682 page 3
- ^ Merriam-Webster's encyclopedia of world religions by Wendy Doniger, 1999 ISBN 0877790442 page 696 [1]
- ^ Symbolic scores: studies in the music of the Renaissance by Willem Elders 1997 ISBN 9004099700 page 151 [2]
- ^ Maiden and Mother: Prayers, Hymns, Devotions, and Songs to the Beloved Virgin Mary Throughout the Year by Margaret M. Miles 2001 ISBN 0860123057 page vii [3]
- ^ Raymond Burke, 2008 Mariology: A Guide for Priests, Deacons, seminarians, and Consecrated Persons ISBN 1579183557 page xxi
- ^ Pope John Paul II 1986 Speech at the Vatican Website
- ^ Arthur Calkins, The Alliance of the Two Hearts and Consecration, Miles Immaculatae XXXI (July/December 1995) 389-407. [4]
- ^ Proceedings of the International Theological Symposium on the Alliance of the Hearts of Jesus and Mary, September 1986, Fátima, Portugal
- ^ At the center of this mystery, in the midst of this wonderment of faith, stands Mary. As the loving Mother of the Redeemer, she was the first to experience it: "To the wonderment of nature you bore your Creator"! Pope John Paul II, in Redemptoris Mater, 51
- ^ See Pius XII Mystici corporis Christi; John Henry Newman: Mariology is always christocentric, in Michael Testa, Mary: The Virgin Mary in the Life and Writings of John Henry Newman 2001; "Mariology Is Christology", in Vittorio Messori, The Mary Hypothesis, Rome: 2005
- ^ Paul Haffner, 2004 The mystery of Mary Gracewing Press ISBN 0852446500 page 17
- ^ Jenny Schroede, 2006 The Everything Mary Book ISBN 1593377134 page 219
- ^ Mystici Corporis, Lumen Gentium and Redemptoris Mater provide a modern Catholic understanding of this link.
- ^ see Pius XII, Mystici corporis, also John Paul II in Redemptoris Mater: The Second Vatican Council, by presenting Mary in the mystery of Christ, also finds the path to a deeper understanding of the mystery of the Church. Mary, as the Mother of Christ, is in a particular way united with the Church, "which the Lord established as his own body."11 It is significant that the conciliar text places this truth about the Church as the Body of Christ (according to the teaching of the Pauline Letters) in close proximity to the truth that the Son of God "through the power of the Holy Spirit was born of the Virgin Mary." The reality of the Incarnation finds an extension in the mystery of the Church-the Body of Christ. And one cannot think of the reality of the Incarnation without referring to Mary, the Mother of the Incarnate Word. Redemptoris Mater 44
- ^ "If we look at the Church, we have to have to consider the miraculous deeds which God performed with his mother." (Paul VI, Vatican II, November 21, 1964)
- ^ Schmaus, Mariologie, München: 1955, 328
- ^ Pope Saint Pius X, in Ad Diem Illum, section 5, 1904
- ^ Schmaus, Mariologie, page 174
- ^ Otto Stegmüller, Barock, in Marienkunde, 1967 566
- ^ A Roskovany, conceptu immacolata ex monumentis omnium seculrorum demonstrate III, Budapest: 1873
- ^ Vatican website
- ^ Bäumer 534
- ^ Irenaeus of Lyons, Adversus haereses 3:22
- ^ Irenaeus, Book V, 19,3
- ^ Ambrose of Milan, CSEL 64, 139
- ^ Ambrose of Milan, De Mysteriis, 59, PG 16, 410
- ^ Ambrose of Milan, De Spiritu Sancto, III, 11,79-80
- ^ "Per feminam mors, per feminam vita", De Sacra Virginitate,289
- ^ P Hitz, Alfons v. Liguori, in Marienkunde, 1967 130
- ^ Mark Miravalle, 1993, Introduction to Mary, Queenship Publishing ISBN 9781882972067 page 51
- ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church §499
- ^ Celsus, Julian apostate, Cerinth and the Ebonites
- ^ which Christians believe is messianic, pointing to Mary’s role in the history of salvation
- ^ Para? 146
- ^ Para 496.
- ^ This is a teaching taught infallibly as de fide credenda by the ordinary and universal magisterium of the Church.
- ^ morando partu edidit Encyclical Mystici Corporis 110
- ^ Hieronymus, Epistulae 49, 21, Iriniaeus Epid 54, Ignatius of Antioch, Eph, 19,1, Clement of Alexandria, Srom VII, 16,93,Origin, Lev hom 8,2 Ambrose of Milan epistulae, 49,22 Augustine, Enchidrion, 34
- ^ Tertullian, Eunomius, Helvisius, Bonosus of Sardica Ott, 249
- ^ ex maria pura sancta simper virgine, Articuli smalcaldi I,4
- ^ J D Aldama, La vergenidad in partu en la exegesis patristica, Salamanca, 1962, 113
- ^ Though questions and ambiguities remained, at least since the time Scotus had formulated his answer to the last remaining objection (that it would imply Mary needed no saviour) it had been infallibly taught by the ordinary and universal magisterium as at least implied by the deposit of faith (de fide tenenda). The existence of the feast was a strong indication of the Church's belief in the Immaculate Conception, even before its 19th century extraordinary papal definition as a dogma. And consensus since then had been growing that it was not merely implied by the deposit of faith (de fide credenda), but specifically and explicitly revealed (de fide credenda).
- ^ Fulgens corona 3
- ^ In the encclical Deiparae Virginis Mariae Pope Pius canvased Catholic bishops before making a final decicion on the dogma
- ^ Apostolic Constitution Munificentissimus Deus, no 44.
- ^ This dogma, too, is a good example of the development of doctrine in Catholic thought. It is a truth infallibly taught since long ago as at least implied by the deposit of faith (de fide tenenda) by the ordinary and universal magisterium, and even sometimes extraordinarily by popes. However, in the centuries before the papal definition the consensus had grown to the point where it was infallibly taught as not merely de fide tenenda, but de fide credenda, by the ordinary and universal magisterium. Finally its credenda status was solemnized by an extraordinary papal definition. It is important to note that the Catholic Church does not base its teaching about the Assumption on any apocryphal account, but rather on discernment of the Tradition of the Church, longstanding teaching on this issue, and other theological reasons.
- ^ As the Virgin Mary remained an ever-virgin and sinless, it is viewed that the Virgin Mary could not thus suffer the consequences of Original Sin, which is chiefly Death. http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/3819.htm Nicea II Session 6 Decree
- ^ http://www.ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/NICAEA2.HTM#2 Nicaea II Definition, "without blemish"
- ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church Part 1, Section 963
- ^ Chapter 19. 26-27,
- ^ Pope John Paul II's encyclical Rosarium Virginis Mariae http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_20021016_rosarium-virginis-mariae_en.html
- ^ Pope John Paul II on Saint Louis de Montfort http://www.catholicregister.org/content/view/1402/857/
- ^ 1 Tim, 2,5
- ^ Oratio IV ad Deiparem
- ^ and dating from approximately AD 250
- ^ Ad Caeli Reginam, 51
- ^ ."http://www.zenit.org/article-5650?l=english
- ^ Ott 256
- ^ 1Tim 2,5
- ^ Ott Dogmatics 256
- ^ Ott 256.
- ^ Ad diem Illum 14
- ^ a b AAS, 1918, 181
- ^ Mystici Corporis 110
- ^ Munificentissimus Deus 40
- ^ S. Gregorius Naz., Poemata dogmatica, XVIII, v. 58; PG XXXVII, 485.
- ^ Prudentius, Dittochaeum, XXVII: PL LX, 102 A.
- ^ S. Ephraem, Hymni de B. Maria, ed. Th. J. Lamy, t. II, Mechliniae, 1886, hymn. XIX, p. 624.
- ^ 12, verses 1-5.
- ^ in:enyclical Ad caeli reginam
- ^ Ad Caeli reginam 39
- ^ Ad Caeli reginam 39
- ^ Ann Ball, 2003 Encyclopedia of Catholic Devotions and Practices ISBN 0-87973-910-X
- ^ Catholic Encyclopedia http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12620a.htm
- ^ Joseph P. Christopher et al., 2003 The Raccolta St Athanasius Press ISBN 978-0-9706526-6-9
- ^ R Lauretin, Lourdes, Dossier des documents authentiques, Paris: 1957
- ^ John De Marchi, The Immaculate Heart, New York: Farrar, Straus and Young
- ^ "In virtue of considerations made known, and others which for reason of brevity we omit; humbly invoking the Divine Spirit and placing ourselves under the protection of the most Holy Virgin, and after hearing the opinions of our Rev. Advisors in this diocese, we hereby: 1) Declare worthy of belief, the visions of the shepherd children in the Cova da Iria, parish of Fatima, in this diocese, from 13 May to 13 October 1917. 2) Permit officially the cult of Our Lady of Fatima.1 ", Bishope of Lire-Fatima, October 13, 1930.
- ^ J.M.Böhr, Marguerite Marie Alacoque, Regensburg, p. 101
- ^ Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, (Oxford University Press 2005 ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3)
- ^ Miserentissimus Redemptor, Encyclical of Pope Pius XI [5]
- ^ van Houtryve, La Vierge des Pauvres, Banneux, 1947
- ^ a b Agenzia Fides - Congregazione per l'Evangelizzazione dei Popoli
- ^ Fulgens Corona, 10
- ^ Schmaus Mariologie, 220-247
- ^ Karl Rahner, Das neue Dogma, 1951, Hans Küng, 2008
- ^ Art treasures in Italy by Giulio Carlo Argan, Bernard Samuel Myers, Trewin Copplestone 1969 ASIN: B001KV9P90 page 167
- ^ The thousand faces of the Virgin Mary by George Henry Tavard 1996 ISBN 0814659144 pages vii–viii and 81
- ^ Catholic beliefs and traditions: ancient and ever new by John F. O'Grady 2002 ISBN 0809140470 page 183
- ^ A history of ideas and images in Italian art by James Hall 1983 ISBN 0064333175 page 223
- ^ Iconography of Christian Art by Gertrud Schiller 1971 ASIN: B0023VMZMA page 112
- ^ Renaissance art: a topical dictionary by Irene Earls 1987 ISBN 0313246580 page 174
- ^ Lauren Arnold, 1999 Princely Gifts & Papal Treasures: The Franciscan Mission to China by ISBN 0967062802 page 151
- ^ Lauren Arnold in Atlantic Monthly, September 2007
- ^ The great encounter of China and the West by David E. Mungello 1999 ISBN 0847694399 page 27
- ^ Art and music in the early modern period by Franca Trinchieri Camiz, Katherine A. McIver ISBN 0754606899 page 15
- ^ Mujer del maiz by Angel Vigil 1994 ISBN 1563081946 pages 16–19
- ^ a b Empire of the Aztecs by Barbara A. Somervill 2009 ISBN 1604131497 page 132
- ^ Our Lady of Guadalupe by Jeanette Rodríguez 1994 ISBN 0292770626 pages 44–46
- ^ "Canonization of Juan Diego Cuauhtlatoatzin". Retrieved November 18, 2010.
- ^ The image of Guadalupe by Jody Brant Smith 1995 ISBN 0865544212 pages 1–2
- ^ Miracles of Our Lady by Gonzalo de Berceo, Richard Terry Mount, Annette Grant Cash 1997 ISBN 0813120195 page 6–7
- ^ Miracles of the Blessed Virgin Mary by Johannes Herolt, C. C. Swinton Blandpages 2004 ISBN 1419173081 pages 4–6
- ^ Piety and charity in late medieval Florence by John Henderson 1997 ISBN 0226326888 page 196
- ^ Pilgrimage to images in the fifteenth century by Robert Maniura 2004 ISBN 1843830558 page 104
- ^ Maximilian Kolbe: Saint of Auschwitz by Elaine Murray Stone 1997 ISBN 0809166372 pages 7–8
- ^ Lourdes: A History of Its Apparitions and Cures by Georges Bertrin 2004 ISBN 1417981237 page 181
- ^ The encyclopedia of Christianity, Volume 3 by Erwin Fahlbusch, Geoffrey William Bromiley 2003 ISBN 9004126546 page 339
- ^ "Modern Miracles Have Strict Rules (David van Biega, Time Magazine April 10 1995". Retrieved November, 18, 2010.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|accessdate=
(help) - ^ http://www.east2west.org/doctrine.htm#dormition Comparison of the Assumption and the Dormition of Mary
- ^ Ecclesiasticus II: Orthodox Icons, Saints, Feasts and Prayer by George Dion Dragas 2005 ISBN 0974561800 page 178
- ^ http://www.east2west.org/doctrine.htm#IC Explanation of the Immaculate Conception from an Easern Catholic perspective
- ^ http://www.assumptioncatholicchurch.net/ Many Eastern Catholic churches bear the titles of Latin Rite doctrines such as the Assumption of Mary.
- ^ a b Bäumer, Marienlexikon, 534
- ^ a b c Bäumer, Marienlexikon, 535
- ^ at Viale 30 Aprile- 6, 00153, Rome
- ^ University of Dayton Marian Institute
References
- Saint Louis de Montfort True Devotion to Mary ISBN 1593304706, also available as online text [6]
- Luigi Gambero, 1999, Mary and the Fathers of the Church, Ignatius Press ISBN 0898706866
- Michael Schmaus, Mariologie, Katholische Dogmatik, München Vol V, 1955
- K Algermissen, Boes, Egelhard, Feckes, Michael Schmaus, Lexikon der Marienkunde, Verlag Friedrich Pustet, Regensburg, 1967
- Remigius Bäumer, Leo Scheffczyk (Hrsg.) Marienlexikon Gesamtausgabe, Institutum Marianum Regensburg, 1994, ISBN 3-88096-891-8 (cit. Bäumer)
- Stefano De Fiores, (Marianum) Maria, sintesi di valori. Storia culturale di mariologia. Cinisello Balsamo 2005;
- Stefano de Fiores, (Marianum), Maria. Nuovissimo dizionario. 2 Vols. Bologna 2006;
- Mariology Society of America [7]
- Acta Apostolicae Sedis, referenced as AAS by year.
- Pope Pius IX, Apostolic Constitution
- Pope Pius XII, encyclicals and bulls
- Pope John Paul II, encyclical, apostolic letters and addresses