Jump to content

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m 12 users left. rm AZUREFORJANNE (blocked indef by Courcelles (ABD)). 1 comment(s) removed.
Line 9: Line 9:
List begins below this line.
List begins below this line.
-->
-->
*{{user-uaa|1=WIshIcOUldsAywhOIhAtEOnhErE}} &mdash; Violation of username policy because it's an offensive and disruptive username; ''Obviously a sock of a banned/blocked user, a simple check through his contribution history soon reveals his agenda against three admins - [[User:MuZeMike]], [[User:Boing! said Zebedee]] and [[User:Cirt]].''. <small>[[User:Dave1185|<font face="Rage Italic" size="4" style="color:#000000;color:green"><i>Dave</i></font>]] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">[[user_talk:Dave1185|♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫®]]</span></sup></small> 18:37, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=StaffsPolice}} [[WP:NOSHARE]]: Username suggests the account represents an organization -- the Staffordshire Police, http://www.staffordshire.police.uk/ -- rather than an individual. [[User:Rrburke|-- Rrburke]] ([[User talk:Rrburke|talk]]) 13:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=StaffsPolice}} [[WP:NOSHARE]]: Username suggests the account represents an organization -- the Staffordshire Police, http://www.staffordshire.police.uk/ -- rather than an individual. [[User:Rrburke|-- Rrburke]] ([[User talk:Rrburke|talk]]) 13:51, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=scdaarchitects}} Violation of username policy because it's a promotional username; http://www.scdaarchitects.com/web/index.html <span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''<font color="Black">[[User:Teapotgeorge|Teapot]]</font>'''<font color="silver">[[User:Teapotgeorge|george]]</font></span>[[User talk:Teapotgeorge|<sup><font color="blue">Talk</font></sup>]] 09:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=scdaarchitects}} Violation of username policy because it's a promotional username; http://www.scdaarchitects.com/web/index.html <span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''<font color="Black">[[User:Teapotgeorge|Teapot]]</font>'''<font color="silver">[[User:Teapotgeorge|george]]</font></span>[[User talk:Teapotgeorge|<sup><font color="blue">Talk</font></sup>]] 09:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:37, 3 June 2011

    Usernames for administrator attention

    This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.

    1. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
    2. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
    3. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
    4. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
    5. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
    6. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
    7. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
    This page was last updated at 04:16 on 12 September 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.

    Note: Administrators should also kindly consider usernames listed at Filter 149, Filter 188, Filter 354, WP:UAA/HP and CAT:UAA.


    User-reported

    Being discussed with the user. I learn something new every day. Avicennasis @ 02:01, 1 Sivan 5771 / 3 June 2011 (UTC)
    Being discussed with the user. Avicennasis @ 19:37, 29 Iyar 5771 / 2 June 2011 (UTC)
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:58, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait until the user edits. (No more disruptive than spelling your name in Cyrillic or Katakana, which productive editors do sometimes.) I'd hate to block such an amusing username if he turns out to be productive. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:24, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Not that the above username bothers me in particular, it's one of those that's on the border, and I figured I'd, well, bring it to your attention. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: User page, actually. But let's see what further editing, if any, they do. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait until the user edits. Just on the possibility there's something else going on here. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]